Normalized to: Fukushima, T.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.04966 [pdf] - 1901879
The stellar halo of the Milky Way traced by blue horizontal-branch stars
in the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey
Fukushima, Tetsuya;
Chiba, Masashi;
Tanaka, Mikito;
Hayashi, Kohei;
Homma, Daisuke;
Okamoto, Sakurako;
Komiyama, Yutaka;
Tanaka, Masayuki;
Arimoto, Nobuo;
Matsuno, Tadafumi
Submitted: 2019-04-09, last modified: 2019-06-06
We report on the global structure of the Milky Way (MW) stellar halo up to
its outer boundary based on the analysis of blue-horizontal branch stars
(BHBs). These halo tracers are extracted from the $(g,r,i,z)$ band
multi-photometry in the internal data release of the on-going Hyper Suprime-Cam
Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP) surveyed over $\sim550$~deg$^2$ area. In
order to select most likely BHBs by removing blue straggler stars (BSs) and
other contamination in a statistically significant manner, we have developed
and applied an extensive Bayesian method, instead of the simple color cuts
adopted in our previous work, where each of the template BHBs and non-BHBs
obtained from the available catalogs is represented as a mixture of multiple
Gaussian distributions in the color-color diagrams. We found from the candidate
BHBs in the range of 18.5<g<23.5 mag that the radial density distribution over
a Galactocentric radius of r=36-360 kpc can be approximated as a single
power-law profile with an index of $\alpha=3.74^{+0.21}_{-0.22}$ or a broken
power-law profile with an index of $\alpha_{\rm in}=2.92^{+0.33}_{-0.33}$ at
$r$ below a broken radius of $r_{\rm b}=160^{+18}_{-19}$~kpc and a very steep
slope of $\alpha_{\rm out}=15.0^{+3.7}_{-4.5}$ at $r>r_{\rm b}$. The latter
profile with a prolate shape having an axial ratio of $q=1.72^{+0.44}_{-0.28}$
is most likely and this halo may hold a rather sharp boundary at r=160kpc. The
slopes of the halo density profiles are compared with those from the suite of
hydrodynamical simulations for the formation of stellar halos. This comparison
suggests that the MW stellar halo may consist of the two overlapping
components: the in situ. inner halo as probed by RR Lyrae stars showing a
relatively steep radial density profile and the ex situ. outer halo with a
shallow profile probed by BHBs here, which is made by accretion of small
stellar systems.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.10701 [pdf] - 1697970
Structure of the Milky Way stellar halo out to its outer boundary with
blue horizontal-branch stars
Submitted: 2017-11-29, last modified: 2018-04-24
We present the structure of the Milky Way stellar halo beyond Galactocentric
distances of $r = 50$ kpc traced by blue horizontal-branch (BHB) stars, which
are extracted from the survey data in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic
Program (HSC-SSP). We select BHB candidates based on $(g,r,i,z)$ photometry,
where the $z$-band is on the Paschen series and the colors that involve the
$z$-band are sensitive to surface gravity. About 450 BHB candidates are
identified between $r = 50$ kpc and 300 kpc, most of which are beyond the reach
of previous large surveys including the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We find that
the global structure of the stellar halo in this range has substructures, which
are especially remarkable in the GAMA15H and XMM-LSS fields in the HSC-SSP. We
find that the stellar halo can be fitted to a single power-law density profile
with an index of $\alpha \simeq 3.3$ ($3.5$) with (without) these fields and
its global axial ratio is $q \simeq 2.2$ ($1.3$). Thus, the stellar halo may be
significantly disturbed and be made in a prolate form by halo substructures,
perhaps associated with the Sagittarius stream in its extension beyond $r \sim
100$ kpc. For a broken power-law model allowing different power-law indices
inside/outside a break radius, we obtain a steep power-law slope of $\alpha
\sim 5$ outside a break radius of $\simeq 100$ kpc ($200$ kpc) for the case
with (without) GAMA15H and XMM-LSS. This radius of $200$ kpc might be as close
as a halo boundary if there is any, although larger BHB sample is required from
further HSC-SSP survey to increase its statistical significance.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.07537 [pdf] - 1585069
Temporal Evolution of the Gamma-ray Burst Afterglow Spectrum for an
Observer: GeV--TeV Synchrotron Self-Compton Light Curve
Submitted: 2017-06-22, last modified: 2017-07-15
We numerically simulate the gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow emission with a
one-zone time-dependent code. The temporal evolutions of the decelerating
shocked shell and energy distributions of electrons and photons are
consistently calculated. The photon spectrum and light curves for an observer
are obtained taking into account the relativistic propagation of the shocked
shell and the curvature of the emission surface. We find that the onset time of
the afterglow is significantly earlier than the previous analytical estimate.
The analytical formulae of the shock propagation and light curve for the
radiative case are also different from our results. Our results show that even
if the emission mechanism is switching from synchrotron to synchrotron
self-Compton, the gamma-ray light curves can be a smooth power-law, which
agrees with the observed light curve and the late detection of a 32 GeV photon
in GRB 130427A. The uncertainty of the model parameters obtained with the
analytical formula is discussed, especially in connection with the closure
relation between spectral index and decay index.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0303376 [pdf] - 55615
The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics and
metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement
Soffel, M.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Petit, G.;
Wolf, P.;
Kopeikin, S. M.;
Bretagnon, P.;
Brumberg, V. A.;
Capitaine, N.;
Damour, T.;
Fukushima, T.;
Guinot, B.;
Huang, T.;
Lindegren, L.;
Ma, C.;
Nordtvedt, K.;
Ries, J.;
Seidelmann, P. K.;
Vokrouhlicky, D.;
Will, C.;
Xu, Ch.
Submitted: 2003-03-17
This paper discusses the IAU Resolutions B1.3, B1.4, B1.5 and B1.9 (2000)
that were adopted during the 24th General Assembly in Manchester, 2000 and
provides details and explanations for these Resolutions. It is explained why
they present significant progress over the corresponding IAU 1991 Resolutions
and why they are necessary in the light of present accuracies in astrometry,
celestial mechanics and metrology. In fact most of these Resolutions are
consistent with astronomical models and software already in use.
The metric tensors and gravitational potentials of both the Barycentric
Celestial Reference System and Geocentric Celestial Reference System are
defined and discussed. The necessity and relevance of the two celestial
reference systems are explained. The transformations of coordinates and
gravitational potentials are discussed. Potential coefficients parameterizing
the post-Newtonian gravitational potentials are expounded. Simplified versions
of the time transformations suitable for modern clock accuracies are
elucidated. Various approximations used in the Resolutions are explicated and
justified. Some models (e.g. for higher spin moments) that serve the purpose
for estimating orders of magnitude have actually never been published before.