sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Fukushima, T.

Normalized to: Fukushima, T.

4 article(s) in total. 30 co-authors, from 1 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.04966  [pdf] - 1901879
The stellar halo of the Milky Way traced by blue horizontal-branch stars in the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey
Comments: 15 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables, version to be published in PASJ
Submitted: 2019-04-09, last modified: 2019-06-06
We report on the global structure of the Milky Way (MW) stellar halo up to its outer boundary based on the analysis of blue-horizontal branch stars (BHBs). These halo tracers are extracted from the $(g,r,i,z)$ band multi-photometry in the internal data release of the on-going Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP) surveyed over $\sim550$~deg$^2$ area. In order to select most likely BHBs by removing blue straggler stars (BSs) and other contamination in a statistically significant manner, we have developed and applied an extensive Bayesian method, instead of the simple color cuts adopted in our previous work, where each of the template BHBs and non-BHBs obtained from the available catalogs is represented as a mixture of multiple Gaussian distributions in the color-color diagrams. We found from the candidate BHBs in the range of 18.5<g<23.5 mag that the radial density distribution over a Galactocentric radius of r=36-360 kpc can be approximated as a single power-law profile with an index of $\alpha=3.74^{+0.21}_{-0.22}$ or a broken power-law profile with an index of $\alpha_{\rm in}=2.92^{+0.33}_{-0.33}$ at $r$ below a broken radius of $r_{\rm b}=160^{+18}_{-19}$~kpc and a very steep slope of $\alpha_{\rm out}=15.0^{+3.7}_{-4.5}$ at $r>r_{\rm b}$. The latter profile with a prolate shape having an axial ratio of $q=1.72^{+0.44}_{-0.28}$ is most likely and this halo may hold a rather sharp boundary at r=160kpc. The slopes of the halo density profiles are compared with those from the suite of hydrodynamical simulations for the formation of stellar halos. This comparison suggests that the MW stellar halo may consist of the two overlapping components: the in situ. inner halo as probed by RR Lyrae stars showing a relatively steep radial density profile and the ex situ. outer halo with a shallow profile probed by BHBs here, which is made by accretion of small stellar systems.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.10701  [pdf] - 1697970
Structure of the Milky Way stellar halo out to its outer boundary with blue horizontal-branch stars
Comments: 12 pages, 8 figures, revised version, accepted for publication in PASJ
Submitted: 2017-11-29, last modified: 2018-04-24
We present the structure of the Milky Way stellar halo beyond Galactocentric distances of $r = 50$ kpc traced by blue horizontal-branch (BHB) stars, which are extracted from the survey data in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP). We select BHB candidates based on $(g,r,i,z)$ photometry, where the $z$-band is on the Paschen series and the colors that involve the $z$-band are sensitive to surface gravity. About 450 BHB candidates are identified between $r = 50$ kpc and 300 kpc, most of which are beyond the reach of previous large surveys including the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We find that the global structure of the stellar halo in this range has substructures, which are especially remarkable in the GAMA15H and XMM-LSS fields in the HSC-SSP. We find that the stellar halo can be fitted to a single power-law density profile with an index of $\alpha \simeq 3.3$ ($3.5$) with (without) these fields and its global axial ratio is $q \simeq 2.2$ ($1.3$). Thus, the stellar halo may be significantly disturbed and be made in a prolate form by halo substructures, perhaps associated with the Sagittarius stream in its extension beyond $r \sim 100$ kpc. For a broken power-law model allowing different power-law indices inside/outside a break radius, we obtain a steep power-law slope of $\alpha \sim 5$ outside a break radius of $\simeq 100$ kpc ($200$ kpc) for the case with (without) GAMA15H and XMM-LSS. This radius of $200$ kpc might be as close as a halo boundary if there is any, although larger BHB sample is required from further HSC-SSP survey to increase its statistical significance.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1706.07537  [pdf] - 1585069
Temporal Evolution of the Gamma-ray Burst Afterglow Spectrum for an Observer: GeV--TeV Synchrotron Self-Compton Light Curve
Comments: 11 pages, 11 figures, Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2017-06-22, last modified: 2017-07-15
We numerically simulate the gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow emission with a one-zone time-dependent code. The temporal evolutions of the decelerating shocked shell and energy distributions of electrons and photons are consistently calculated. The photon spectrum and light curves for an observer are obtained taking into account the relativistic propagation of the shocked shell and the curvature of the emission surface. We find that the onset time of the afterglow is significantly earlier than the previous analytical estimate. The analytical formulae of the shock propagation and light curve for the radiative case are also different from our results. Our results show that even if the emission mechanism is switching from synchrotron to synchrotron self-Compton, the gamma-ray light curves can be a smooth power-law, which agrees with the observed light curve and the late detection of a 32 GeV photon in GRB 130427A. The uncertainty of the model parameters obtained with the analytical formula is discussed, especially in connection with the closure relation between spectral index and decay index.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0303376  [pdf] - 55615
The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics and metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement
Comments: 45 pages, 1 figure, submitted to Astronomical Journal
Submitted: 2003-03-17
This paper discusses the IAU Resolutions B1.3, B1.4, B1.5 and B1.9 (2000) that were adopted during the 24th General Assembly in Manchester, 2000 and provides details and explanations for these Resolutions. It is explained why they present significant progress over the corresponding IAU 1991 Resolutions and why they are necessary in the light of present accuracies in astrometry, celestial mechanics and metrology. In fact most of these Resolutions are consistent with astronomical models and software already in use. The metric tensors and gravitational potentials of both the Barycentric Celestial Reference System and Geocentric Celestial Reference System are defined and discussed. The necessity and relevance of the two celestial reference systems are explained. The transformations of coordinates and gravitational potentials are discussed. Potential coefficients parameterizing the post-Newtonian gravitational potentials are expounded. Simplified versions of the time transformations suitable for modern clock accuracies are elucidated. Various approximations used in the Resolutions are explicated and justified. Some models (e.g. for higher spin moments) that serve the purpose for estimating orders of magnitude have actually never been published before.