We report the discovery of faint common-proper-motion companions to the nearby southern solar-type stars HD43162, HD67199, HD114837, HD114853, HD129502, HD165185, HD197214, and HD212330 from near-infrared imaging and astrometry. We also confirm the previously identified tertiary components around HD165401 and HD188088. Since the majority of these stars were already known as binaries, they ascend now to higher-level systems. A particularly interesting case is the G6.5V BYDra-type variable HD43162, which harbors two common-proper-motion companions at distances of 410 AU and 2740 AU. Our limited study shows that the inventory of common-proper-motion companions around nearby bright stars is still not completely known.

We report about an ongoing photometric and spectroscopic monitoring survey of about 250 O- and 540 B-type stars in the southern Milky Way with the aim to determine the fraction of close binary systems as a function of mass and to determine the physical parameters of the individual components in the multiple systems. Preliminary results suggest that the multiplicity rate drops from 80% for the highest masses to 20% for stars of 3 solar masses. Our analysis indicates that the binary systems often contain close pairs with components of similar mass. This coincidence cannot originate from a random tidal capture in a dense cluster but is likely due to a particular formation process for high-mass stars. The large percentage of multiple systems requires a new photometric calibration for the absolute magnitudes of O-type stars.

We present an H-band image of the companion of Chi 1 Orionis taken with the Keck adaptive optic system and NIRC2 camera equipped with a 300mas-diameter coronographic mask. The direct detection of this companion star enables us to calculate dynamical masses using only Kepler's laws M_A = 1.01 +/- 0.13 M_Sun, M_B = 0.15 +/- 0.02 M_Sun, and to study stellar evolutionary models at a wide spread of masses. The application of Baraffe et al. (1998) pre-main-sequence models implies an age of 70-130 Myrs. This is in conflict to the age of the primary, a confirmed member of the Ursa Major Cluster with a canonical age of 300 Myrs. As a consequence, either the models at low masses underestimate the age or the Ursa Major Cluster is considerably younger than assumed.