Normalized to: Frederiks, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.10503 [pdf] - 2105663
A mildly relativistic outflow from the energetic, fast-rising blue
optical transient CSS161010 in a dwarf galaxy
Coppejans, D. L.;
Margutti, R.;
Terreran, G.;
Nayana, A. J.;
Coughlin, E. R.;
Laskar, T.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Bietenholz, M.;
Caprioli, D.;
Chandra, P.;
Drout, M.;
Frederiks, D.;
Frohmaier, C.;
Hurley, K.;
Kochanek, C. S.;
MacLeod, M.;
Meisner, A.;
Nugent, P. E.;
Ridnaia, A.;
Sand, D. J.;
Svinkin, D.;
Ward, C.;
Yang, S.;
Baldeschi, A.;
Chilingarian, I. V.;
Dong, Y.;
Esquivia, C.;
Fong, W.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Lundqvist, P.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Paterson, K.;
Reichart, D. E.;
Shappee, B.;
Stroh, M. C.;
Valenti, S.;
Zauderer, A.;
Zhang, B.
Submitted: 2020-03-23, last modified: 2020-05-23
We present X-ray and radio observations of the Fast Blue Optical Transient
(FBOT) CRTS-CSS161010 J045834-081803 (CSS161010 hereafter) at t=69-531 days.
CSS161010 shows luminous X-ray ($L_x\sim5\times 10^{39}\,\rm{erg\,s^{-1}}$) and
radio ($L_{\nu}\sim10^{29}\,\rm{erg\,s^{-1}Hz^{-1}}$) emission. The radio
emission peaked at ~100 days post transient explosion and rapidly decayed. We
interpret these observations in the context of synchrotron emission from an
expanding blastwave. CSS161010 launched a mildly relativistic outflow with
velocity $\Gamma\beta c\ge0.55c$ at ~100 days. This is faster than the
non-relativistic AT2018cow ($\Gamma\beta c\sim0.1c$) and closer to ZTF18abvkwla
($\Gamma\beta c\ge0.3c$ at 63 days). The inferred initial kinetic energy of
CSS161010 ($E_k\gtrsim10^{51}$ erg) is comparable to that of long Gamma Ray
Bursts (GRBs), but the ejecta mass that is coupled to the mildly relativistic
outflow is significantly larger ($\sim0.01-0.1\,\rm{M_{\odot}}$). This is
consistent with the lack of observed gamma-rays. The luminous X-rays were
produced by a different emission component to the synchrotron radio emission.
CSS161010 is located at ~150 Mpc in a dwarf galaxy with stellar mass
$M_{*}\sim10^{7}\,\rm{M_{\odot}}$ and specific star formation rate $sSFR\sim
0.3\,\rm{Gyr^{-1}}$. This mass is among the lowest inferred for host-galaxies
of explosive transients from massive stars. Our observations of CSS161010 are
consistent with an engine-driven aspherical explosion from a rare evolutionary
path of a H-rich stellar progenitor, but we cannot rule out a stellar tidal
disruption event on a centrally-located intermediate mass black hole.
Regardless of the physical mechanism, CSS161010 establishes the existence of a
new class of rare (rate $<0.4\%$ of the local core-collapse supernova rate)
H-rich transients that can launch mildly relativistic outflows.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.11178 [pdf] - 2099852
A peculiar hard X-ray counterpart of a Galactic fast radio burst
Ridnaia, A.;
Svinkin, D.;
Frederiks, D.;
Bykov, A.;
Popov, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Lysenko, A.;
Tsvetkova, A.;
Ulanov, M.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2020-05-22
Fast radio bursts are bright, millisecond-scale radio flashes of yet unknown
physical origin. Recently, their extragalactic nature has been demonstrated,
and an increasing number of the sources have been found to repeat. Young,
highly magnetized, isolated neutron stars - magnetars - have been suggested as
the most promising candidates for fast radio burst progenitors owing to their
energetics and high X-ray flaring activity. Here we report the detection with
the Konus-Wind detector of a hard X-ray event of April 28, 2020, temporarily
coincident with a bright, two-peak radio burst with properties remarkably
similar to those of fast radio bursts. The source of the radio burst is located
in the direction to the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154, which recently entered
an active state. We show that a separation between two peaks of the
double-peaked X-ray burst is nearly the same as that of the radio peaks,
confirming that the X-ray and radio emission most likely have a common origin.
Thus, this is the first simultaneous detection of a fast radio burst from a
Galactic magnetar and its high-energy counterpart. The total energy emitted in
X-rays in this burst is typical of bright short magnetar bursts, but its spiky
light curve and an unusual hardness of the energy spectrum distinguish the
April 28 event among multiple 'ordinary' flares detected from SGR 1935+2154
previously. This, and a recent non-detection of radio emission from two typical
bright soft bursts from the same magnetar, may imply the existence of a special
class of magnetar flares capable of producing fast radio bursts.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.01222 [pdf] - 2105640
The Koala: A Fast Blue Optical Transient with Luminous Radio Emission
from a Starburst Dwarf Galaxy at $z=0.27$
Ho, Anna Y. Q.;
Perley, D. A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Dong, D. Z. J.;
De, K.;
Chandra, P.;
Andreoni, I.;
Bellm, E. C.;
Burdge, K. B.;
Coughlin, M.;
Dekany, R.;
Feeney, M.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Fremling, C.;
Golkhou, V. Z.;
Graham, M.;
Hale, D.;
Helou, G.;
Horesh, A.;
Laher, R. R.;
Masci, F.;
Miller, A. A.;
Porter, M.;
Ridnaia, A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Shupe, D. L.;
Soumagnac, M. T.;
Svinkin, D. S.
Submitted: 2020-03-02, last modified: 2020-04-13
We present ZTF18abvkwla (the "Koala"), a fast blue optical transient
discovered in the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) One-Day Cadence (1DC) Survey.
ZTF18abvkwla has a number of features in common with the groundbreaking
transient AT2018cow: blue colors at peak ($g-r\approx-0.5$ mag), a short rise
time from half-max of under two days, a decay time to half-max of only three
days, a high optical luminosity ($M_{g,\mathrm{peak}}\approx-20.6$mag), a hot
($\gtrsim 40,000$K) featureless spectrum at peak light, and a luminous radio
counterpart. At late times ($\Delta t>80$d) the radio luminosity of
ZTF18abvkwla ($\nu L_\nu \gtrsim 10^{40}$erg/s at 10 GHz, observer-frame) is
most similar to that of long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The host galaxy
is a dwarf starburst galaxy ($M\approx5\times10^{8}M_\odot$,
$\mathrm{SFR}\approx7 M_\odot$/yr) that is moderately metal-enriched
($\log\mathrm{[O/H]} \approx 8.5$), similar to the hosts of GRBs and
superluminous supernovae. As in AT2018cow, the radio and optical emission in
ZTF18abvkwla likely arise from two separate components: the radio from
fast-moving ejecta ($\Gamma \beta c >0.38c$) and the optical from
shock-interaction with confined dense material ($<0.07M_\odot$ in $\sim
10^{15}$cm). Compiling transients in the literature with $t_\mathrm{rise} <5$d
and $M_\mathrm{peak}<-20$mag, we find that a significant number are
engine-powered, and suggest that the high peak optical luminosity is directly
related to the presence of this engine. From 18 months of the 1DC survey, we
find that transients in this rise-luminosity phase space are at least two to
three orders of magnitude less common than CC SNe. Finally, we discuss
strategies for identifying such events with future facilities like the Large
Synoptic Survey Telescope, and prospects for detecting accompanying X-ray and
radio emission.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.10354 [pdf] - 2089057
The Broad-lined Ic Supernova ZTF18aaqjovh (SN 2018bvw): An
Optically-discovered Engine-driven Supernova Candidate with Luminous Radio
Emission
Ho, Anna Y. Q.;
Corsi, Alessandra;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Taddia, Francesco;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Adams, Scott;
De, Kishalay;
Dekany, Richard;
Frederiks, Dmitry D.;
Fremling, Christoffer;
Golkhou, V. Zach;
Kupfer, Thomas;
Laher, Russ R.;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Masci, Frank J.;
Miller, Adam A.;
Neill, James D.;
Reiley, Daniel;
Riddle, Reed;
Ridnaia, Anna;
Rusholme, Ben;
Sharma, Yashvi;
Sollerman, Jesper;
Soumagnac, Maayane T.;
Svinkin, Dmitry S.;
Shupe, David L.
Submitted: 2019-12-21, last modified: 2020-04-04
We present ZTF18aaqjovh (SN 2018bvw), a high-velocity ("broad-lined")
stripped-envelope (Type Ic) supernova (Ic-BL SN) discovered in the Zwicky
Transient Facility one-day cadence survey. ZTF18aaqjovh shares a number of
features in common with engine-driven explosions: the photospheric velocity and
the shape of the optical light curve are very similar to that of the Type Ic-BL
SN 1998bw, which was associated with a low-luminosity gamma-ray burst (LLGRB)
and had relativistic ejecta. However, the radio luminosity of ZTF18aaqjovh is
almost two orders of magnitude fainter than that of SN 1998bw at the same
velocity phase, and the shock velocity is at most mildly relativistic
(v=0.06-0.4c). A search of high-energy catalogs reveals no compelling GRB
counterpart to ZTF18aaqjovh, and the limit on the prompt GRB luminosity of
$L_{\gamma,\mathrm{iso}} \approx 1.6 \times 10^{48}$ erg/sec excludes a
classical GRB but not an LLGRB. Altogether, ZTF18aaqjovh represents another
transition event between engine-driven SNe associated with GRBs and "ordinary"
Ic-BL SNe.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.00402 [pdf] - 1908799
GRB observations with Konus-WIND experiment
Submitted: 2019-06-30
We give a short review of gamma-ray burst (GRB) observations with the
Konus-WIND (KW) experiment, which has been providing a continuous all-sky
coverage in the 20 keV-15 MeV band during the period from 1994 to present. The
recent results include a systematic study of GRBs with known redshifts and a
search for ultra-long GRBs in the KW archival data. We also discuss the KW
capabilities for multi-messenger astronomy.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.10017 [pdf] - 1897138
Gamma-ray emission from the impulsive phase of the 2017 September 06
X9.3 flare
Submitted: 2019-04-22
We report hard X-ray and gamma-ray observations of the impulsive phase of the
SOL2017-09-06T11:55 X9.3 solar flare. We focus on a high-energy part of the
spectrum, >100 keV, and perform time resolved spectral analysis for a portion
of the impulsive phase, recorded by the Konus-Wind experiment, that displayed
prominent gamma-ray emission. Given a variety of possible emission components
contributing to the gamma-ray emission, we employ a Bayesian inference to build
the most probable fitting model. The analysis confidently revealed
contributions from nuclear deexcitation lines, electron-positron annihilation
line at 511 keV, and a neutron capture line at 2.223 MeV along with two
components of the bremsstrahlung continuum. The revealed time evolution of the
spectral components is particularly interesting. The low-energy bremsstrahlung
continuum shows a soft-hard-soft pattern typical for impulsive flares, while
the high-energy one shows a persistent hardening at the course of the flare.
The neutron capture line emission shows an unusually short time delay relative
to the nuclear deexcitation line component, which implies that the production
of neutrons was significantly reduced soon after the event onset. This in turn
may imply a prominent softening of the accelerated proton spectrum at the
course of the flare, similar to the observed softening of the low-energy
component of the accelerated electrons responsible for the low-energy
bremsstrahlung continuum. We discuss possible physical scenarios, which might
result in the obtained relationships between these gamma-ray components.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.10720 [pdf] - 1830494
An embedded X-ray source shines through the aspherical AT2018cow:
revealing the inner workings of the most luminous fast-evolving optical
transients
Margutti, Raffaella;
Metzger, B. D.;
Chornock, R.;
Vurm, I.;
Roth, N.;
Grefenstette, B. W.;
Savchenko, V.;
Cartier, R.;
Steiner, J. F.;
Terreran, G.;
Migliori, G.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Bietenholz, M.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Bozzo, E.;
Brethauer, D.;
Chilingarian, I. V.;
Coppejans, D. L.;
Ducci, L.;
Ferrigno, C.;
Fong, W.;
GÖtz, D.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Hajela, A.;
Hurley, K.;
Kuulkers, E.;
Laurent, P.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Nicholl, M.;
Patnaude, D.;
Ubertini, P.;
Banovetz, J.;
Bartel, N.;
Berger, E.;
Coughlin, E. R.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Kozlova, A. V.;
Laskar, T.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Drout, M. R.;
Macfadyen, A.;
Paterson, K.
Submitted: 2018-10-25
We present the first extensive radio to gamma-ray observations of a
fast-rising blue optical transient (FBOT), AT2018cow, over its first ~100 days.
AT2018cow rose over a few days to a peak luminosity $L_{pk}\sim4\times 10^{44}$
erg/s exceeding those of superluminous supernovae (SNe), before declining as
$\propto t^{-2}$. Initial spectra at $\lesssim 15$ days were mostly featureless
and indicated large expansion velocities v~0.1c and temperatures reaching 30000
K. Later spectra revealed a persistent optically-thick photosphere and the
emergence of H and He emission features with v~sim 4000 km/s with no evidence
for ejecta cooling. Our broad-band monitoring revealed a hard X-ray spectral
component at $E\ge 10$ keV, in addition to luminous and highly variable soft
X-rays, with properties unprecedented among astronomical transients. An abrupt
change in the X-ray decay rate and variability appears to accompany the change
in optical spectral properties. AT2018cow showed bright radio emission
consistent with the interaction of a blastwave with $v_{sh}$~0.1c with a dense
environment ($\dot M\sim10^{-3}-10^{-4}\,M_{\odot}yr^{-1}$ for $v_w=1000$
km\s). While these properties exclude Ni-powered transients, our
multi-wavelength analysis instead indicates that AT2018cow harbored a "central
engine", either a compact object (magnetar or black hole) or an embedded
internal shock produced by interaction with a compact, dense circumstellar
medium. The engine released $\sim10^{50}-10^{51.5}$ erg over $\sim10^3-10^5$ s
and resides within low-mass fast-moving material with equatorial-polar density
asymmetry ($M_{ej,fast}\lesssim0.3\,\rm{M_{\odot}}$). Successful SNe from
low-mass H-rich stars (like electron-capture SNe) or failed explosions from
blue supergiants satisfy these constraints. Intermediate-mass black-holes are
disfavored by the large environmental density probed by the radio observations.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.03339 [pdf] - 1783956
GRB171205A/SN2017iuk: A local low-luminosity gamma-ray burst
D'Elia, V.;
Campana, S.;
D'Aì, A.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Emery, S. W. K.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Lien, A.;
Melandri, A.;
Page, K. L.;
Starling, R. L. C.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Breeveld, A. A.;
Oates, S. R.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Brown, P. J.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Tohuvavohu, A.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.
Submitted: 2018-10-08
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) occurring in the local Universe constitute an
interesting sub-class of the GRB family, since their luminosity is on average
lower than that of their cosmological analogs. We aim to contribute to the
study of local bursts by reporting the case of GRB 171205A. This source was
discovered by Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) on 2017, December 5 and soon
associated with a low redshift host galaxy (z=0.037), and an emerging SN (SN
2017iuk). We analyzed the full Swift, dataset, comprising the UV-Optical
Telescope (UVOT), X-ray Telescope (XRT) and BAT data. In addition, we employed
the Konus-Wind high energy data as a valuable extension at gamma-ray energies.
The photometric SN signature is clearly visible in the UVOT u, b and v filters.
The maximum emission is reached at ~ 13 (rest frame) days, and the whole bump
resembles that of SN 2006aj, but lower in magnitude and with a shift in time of
+2 d. A prebump in the v-band is also clearly visible, and this is the first
time that such a feature is not observed achromatically in GRB-SNe. Its
physical origin cannot be easily explained. The X-ray spectrum shows an
intrinsic Hydrogen column density N_H,int = 7.4(+4.1 -3.6) X 10^20 / cm^2$,
which is at the low end of the N_H,int, even considering just low redshift
GRBs. The spectrum also features a thermal component, which is quite common in
GRBs associated with SNe, but whose origin is still a matter of debate.
Finally, the isotropic energy in the gamma-ray band, E_iso = 2.18(+0.63 -0.50)
X 10^49 erg, is lower than those of cosmological GRBs. Combining this value
with the peak energy in the same band, E_p=125(+141 -37) keV, implies that GRB
171205A is an outlier of the Amati relation, as are some other low redshift
GRBs, and its emission mechanism should be different from that of canonical,
farther away GRBs.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.05018 [pdf] - 1614746
iPTF16asu: A Luminous, Rapidly-Evolving, and High-Velocity Supernova
Whitesides, L.;
Lunnan, R.;
Kasliwal, M. M.;
Perley, D. A.;
Corsi, A.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Cao, Y.;
Cook, D. O.;
Doran, G. B.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Fremling, C.;
Hurley, K.;
Karamehmetoglu, E.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Leloudas, G.;
Masci, F.;
Nugent, P. E.;
Ritter, A.;
Rubin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Sollerman, J.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Taddia, F.;
Vreeswijk, P.;
Wozniak, P.
Submitted: 2017-06-15, last modified: 2018-01-09
Wide-field surveys are discovering a growing number of rare transients whose
physical origin is not yet well understood. Here, we present optical and UV
data and analysis of iPTF16asu, a luminous, rapidly-evolving, high velocity,
stripped-envelope supernova. With a rest-frame rise-time of just 4 days and a
peak absolute magnitude of $M_{\rm g}=-20.4$ mag, the light curve of iPTF16asu
is faster and more luminous than previous rapid transients. The spectra of
iPTF16asu show a featureless, blue continuum near peak that develops into a
Type Ic-BL spectrum on the decline. We show that while the late-time light
curve could plausibly be powered by $^{56}$Ni decay, the early emission
requires a different energy source. Non-detections in the X-ray and radio
strongly constrain any associated gamma-ray burst to be low-luminosity. We
suggest that the early emission may have been powered by either a rapidly
spinning-down magnetar, or by shock breakout in an extended envelope of a very
energetic explosion. In either scenario a central engine is required, making
iPTF16asu an intriguing transition object between superluminous supernovae,
Type Ic-BL supernovae, and low-energy gamma-ray bursts.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.02961 [pdf] - 1599683
The maximum isotropic energy of gamma-ray bursts
Atteia, J-L.;
Heussaff, V.;
Dezalay, J. -P.;
Klotz, A.;
Turpin, D.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Zolnierowski, Y.;
Daigne, F.;
Mochkovitch, R.
Submitted: 2017-02-09, last modified: 2017-12-05
The most energetic gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are remarkable sources releasing
huge amounts of energy on short timescales. Their prompt emission, which
usually lasts few seconds, is so bright that it is visible across the whole
observable universe. Studying these extreme events may provide clues on the
nature of GRB progenitors and on the physical processes at work in relativistic
jets.
In this paper, we study the bright end of the isotropic energy distribution
of long GRBs. We use two samples of long GRBs with redshift detected by
Fermi/GBM or Konus-Wind, two instruments which measure the spectral shape and
the energetics of the prompt emission accurately. We focus on GRBs within a
range of redshifts z = 1 -- 5, a volume that contains a large number of
energetic GRBs, and we propose a simple method to reconstruct the bright end of
the GRB energy distribution from the observed one. We find that the GRB energy
distribution cannot be described by a simple power law but requires a strong
cutoff above $1-3 \times 10^{54}$ erg. We attribute this feature to an
intrinsic limit on the energy per unit of solid angle radiated by gamma-ray
bursts.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.08746 [pdf] - 1595233
The Konus-Wind catalog of gamma-ray bursts with known redshifts. I.
Bursts detected in the triggered mode
Tsvetkova, A.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Lysenko, A.;
Oleynik, P.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Svinkin, D.;
Ulanov, M.;
Cline, T.;
Hurley, K.;
Aptekar, R.
Submitted: 2017-10-24, last modified: 2017-10-25
In this catalog, we present the results of a systematic study of gamma-ray
bursts (GRBs) with reliable redshift estimates detected in the triggered mode
of the Konus-Wind (KW) experiment during the period from 1997 February to 2016
June. The sample consists of 150 GRBs (including twelve short/hard bursts) and
represents the largest set of cosmological GRBs studied to date over a broad
energy band. From the temporal and spectral analyses of the sample, we provide
the burst durations, the spectral lags, the results of spectral fits with two
model functions, the total energy fluences, and the peak energy fluxes. Based
on the GRB redshifts, which span the range 0.1 <= z <= 5, we estimate the
rest-frame, isotropic-equivalent energy and peak luminosity. For 32 GRBs with
reasonably-constrained jet breaks we provide the collimation-corrected values
of the energetics. We consider the behavior of the rest-frame GRB parameters in
the hardness-duration and hardness-intensity planes, and confirm the "Amati"
and "Yonetoku" relations for Type II GRBs. The correction for the jet
collimation does not improve these correlations for the KW sample. We discuss
the influence of instrumental selection effects on the GRB parameter
distributions and estimate the KW GRB detection horizon, which extends to z ~
16.6, stressing the importance of GRBs as probes of the early Universe.
Accounting for the instrumental bias, we estimate the KW GRB luminosity
evolution, luminosity and isotropic-energy functions, and the evolution of the
GRB formation rate, which are in general agreement with those obtained in
previous studies.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.03089 [pdf] - 1580853
Transition from Fireball to Poynting-flux-dominated Outflow in
Three-Episode GRB 160625B
Zhang, B. -B.;
Zhang, B.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Dai, Z. G.;
Tam, P. -H. T.;
Wang, X. -Y.;
Hu, Y. -D.;
Karpov, S.;
Pozanenko, A.;
Zhang, F. -W.;
Mazaeva, E.;
Minaev, P.;
Volnova, A.;
Oates, S.;
Gao, H.;
Wu, X. -F.;
Shao, L.;
Tang, Q. -W.;
Beskin, G.;
Biryukov, A.;
Bondar, S.;
Ivanov, E.;
Katkova, E.;
Orekhova, N.;
Perkov, A.;
Sasyuk, V.;
Mankiewicz, L.;
Zarnecki, A. F.;
Cwiek, A.;
Opiela, R.;
Zadrozny, A.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Kusakin, A.;
Inasaridze, R.;
Burhonov, O.;
Rumyantsev, V.;
Klunko, E.;
Moskvitin, A.;
Fatkhullin, T.;
Sokolov, V. V.;
Valeev, A. F.;
Jeong, S.;
Park, I. H.;
Caballero-Garcia, M. D.;
Cunniffe, R.;
Tello, J. C.;
Ferrero, P.;
Pandey, S. B.;
Jelinek, M.;
Peng, F. K.;
Sanchez-Ramirez, R.;
Castellon, A.
Submitted: 2016-12-09, last modified: 2017-10-02
The ejecta composition is an open question in gamma-ray bursts (GRB) physics.
Some GRBs possess a quasi-thermal spectral component in the time-resolved
spectral analysis, suggesting a hot fireball origin. Others show a featureless
non-thermal spectrum known as the "Band" function, consistent with a
synchrotron radiation origin and suggesting that the jet is
Poynting-flux-dominated at the central engine and likely in the emission region
as well. There are also bursts showing a sub-dominant thermal component and a
dominant synchrotron component suggesting a likely hybrid jet composition. Here
we report an extraordinarily bright GRB 160625B, simultaneously observed in
gamma-rays and optical wavelengths, whose prompt emission consists of three
isolated episodes separated by long quiescent intervals, with the durations of
each "sub-burst" being $\sim$ 0.8 s, 35 s, and 212 s, respectively. Its high
brightness (with isotropic peak luminosity L$_{\rm p, iso}\sim 4\times 10^{53}$
erg/s) allows us to conduct detailed time-resolved spectral analysis in each
episode, from precursor to main burst and to extended emission. The spectral
properties of the first two sub-bursts are distinctly different, allowing us to
observe the transition from thermal to non-thermal radiation between
well-separated emission episodes within a single GRB. Such a transition is a
clear indication of the change of jet composition from a fireball to a
Poynting-flux-dominated jet.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.07947 [pdf] - 1580686
Search for Gravitational Waves Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts During
the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run and Implications for the Origin of GRB
150906B
LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
Virgo Collaboration;
IPN Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Belgin, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Canepa, M.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
D'alya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devenson, J.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Douglas, R.;
'Alvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etienne, Z.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Galiana, A. Fern'andez;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fries, E. M.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, Whansun;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klein, B.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kr"amer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
London, L. T.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lovelace, G.;
L"uck, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGrath, C.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muniz, E. A. M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newport, J. M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Noack, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Page, J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poe, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, E.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tippens, T.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, S. J.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.
Submitted: 2016-11-23, last modified: 2017-06-21
We present the results of the search for gravitational waves (GWs) associated
with $\gamma$-ray bursts detected during the first observing run of the
Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). We find no
evidence of a GW signal for any of the 41 $\gamma$-ray bursts for which LIGO
data are available with sufficient duration. For all $\gamma$-ray bursts, we
place lower bounds on the distance to the source using the optimistic
assumption that GWs with an energy of $10^{-2}M_\odot c^2$ were emitted within
the $16$-$500\,$Hz band, and we find a median 90% confidence limit of 71$\,$Mpc
at 150$\,$Hz. For the subset of 19 short/hard $\gamma$-ray bursts, we place
lower bounds on distance with a median 90% confidence limit of 90$\,$Mpc for
binary neutron star (BNS) coalescences, and 150 and 139$\,$Mpc for neutron
star-black hole coalescences with spins aligned to the orbital angular momentum
and in a generic configuration, respectively. These are the highest distance
limits ever achieved by GW searches. We also discuss in detail the results of
the search for GWs associated with GRB 150906B, an event that was localized by
the InterPlanetary Network near the local galaxy NGC 3313, which is at a
luminosity distance of 54$\,$Mpc ($z=0.0124$). Assuming the $\gamma$-ray
emission is beamed with a jet half-opening angle $\leq 30^{\circ}$, we exclude
a BNS and a neutron star-black hole in NGC 3313 as the progenitor of this event
with confidence $>99$%. Further, we exclude such progenitors up to a distance
of 102$\,$Mpc and 170$\,$Mpc, respectively.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.02993 [pdf] - 1403858
The first observation of an intermediate flare from SGR 1935+2154
Kozlova, A. V.;
Israel, G. L.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Hurley, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Zhang, X. -L.
Submitted: 2016-05-10
We report on the bright burst detected by four Interplanetary network (IPN)
spacecraft on 2015 April 12. The IPN localization of the source is consistent
with the position of the recently discovered soft gamma-repeater SGR 1935+2154.
From the Konus-Wind (KW) observation, we derive temporal and spectral
parameters of the emission, and the burst energetics. The rather long duration
of the burst ($\sim$1.7 s) and the large measured energy fluence
($\sim2.5\times10^{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$) put it in the class of rare
"intermediate" SGR flares, and this is the first one observed from SGR
1935+2154. A search for quasi-periodic oscillations in the KW light curve
yields no statistically significant signal. Of four spectral models tested,
optically thin thermal bremsstrahlung and a single blackbody (BB) function can
be rejected on statistical grounds; two more complex models, a cutoff power law
(CPL) and a sum of two BB functions (2BB), fit the burst spectra well and
neither of them may be ruled out by the KW observation. The CPL and 2BB model
parameters we report for this bright flare are typical of SGRs; they are also
consistent with those obtained from observations of much weaker and shorter SGR
1935+2154 bursts with other instruments. From the distribution of double
blackbody spectral fit parameters we estimate the SGR 1935+2154 distance to be
$<$10.0 kpc, in agreement with that of the Galactic supernova remnant G57.2+0.8
at 9.1 kpc.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.01264 [pdf] - 1447654
Investigation of Primordial Black Hole Bursts using Interplanetary
Network Gamma-ray Bursts
Ukwatta, T. N.;
Hurley, K.;
MacGibbon, J. H;
Svinkin, D. S;
Aptekar, R. L;
Golenetskii, S. V;
Frederiks, D. D;
Pal'shin, V. D;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Kozyrev, A. S;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Ohmori, N.;
Feroci, M.;
Frontera, F.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A;
McTiernan, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-03, last modified: 2016-04-27
The detection of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) in the solar neighborhood would have
very important implications for GRB phenomenology. The leading theories for
cosmological GRBs would not be able to explain such events. The final bursts of
evaporating Primordial Black Holes (PBHs), however, would be a natural
explanation for local GRBs. We present a novel technique that can constrain the
distance to gamma-ray bursts using detections from widely separated,
non-imaging spacecraft. This method can determine the actual distance to the
burst if it is local. We applied this method to constrain distances to a sample
of 36 short duration GRBs detected by the Interplanetary Network (IPN) that
show observational properties that are expected from PBH evaporations. These
bursts have minimum possible distances in the 10^13-10^18 cm (7-10^5 AU) range,
consistent with the expected PBH energetics and with a possible origin in the
solar neighborhood, although none of the bursts can be unambiguously
demonstrated to be local. Assuming these bursts are real PBH events, we
estimate lower limits on the PBH burst evaporation rate in the solar
neighborhood.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.06832 [pdf] - 1415142
The second Konus-Wind catalog of short gamma-ray bursts
Svinkin, D. S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Oleynik, Ph. P.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T. L.;
Hurley, K.
Submitted: 2016-03-22
In this catalog, we present the results of a systematic study of 295 short
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by Konus-Wind (KW) from 1994 to 2010. From the
temporal and spectral analyses of the sample, we provide the burst durations,
the spectral lags, the results of spectral fits with three model functions, the
total energy fluences and the peak energy fluxes of the bursts. We discuss
evidence found for an additional power-law spectral component and the presence
of extended emission in a fraction of the KW short GRBs. Finally, we consider
the results obtained in the context of the Type I (merger-origin) / Type II
(collapsar-origin) classifications.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07807 [pdf] - 1579741
The optical identifcation of events with poorly defined locations: The
case of the Fermi GBM GRB140801A
Lipunov, V. M.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Pruzhinskaya, M. V.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Pelassa, V.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Sokolov, I. V.;
Kann, D. A.;
Xu, Dong;
Gorbovskoy, E. S.;
Krushinski, V. V.;
Kornilov, V. G.;
Balanutsa, P. V.;
Boronina, S. V.;
Budnev, N. M.;
Cano, Z.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Chazov, V. V.;
Connaughton, V.;
Delvaux, C.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Fynbo, J. F. U.;
Gabovich, A. V.;
Goldstein, A.;
Greiner, J.;
Gress, O. A.;
Ivanov, K. I.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Klose, S.;
Knust, F.;
Komarova, V. N.;
Konstantinov, E.;
Krylov, A. V.;
Kuvshinov, D. A.;
Kuznetsov, A. S.;
Lipunova, G. V.;
Moskvitin, A. S.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Pandey, S. B.;
Poleshchuk, V. A.;
Schmidl, S.;
Sergienko, Yu. P.;
Sinyakov, E. V.;
Schulze, S.;
Sokolov, V. V.;
Sokolova, T. N.;
Sparre, M.;
Thone, C. C.;
Tlatov, A. G.;
Tyurina, N. V.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Yazev, S. A.;
Yurkov, V. V.
Submitted: 2015-10-27
We report the early discovery of the optical afterglow of gamma-ray burst
(GRB) 140801A in the 137 deg$^2$ 3-$\sigma$ error-box of the Fermi Gamma-ray
Burst Monitor (GBM). MASTER is the only observatory that automatically react to
all Fermi alerts. GRB 140801A is one of the few GRBs whose optical counterpart
was discovered solely from its GBM localization. The optical afterglow of GRB
140801A was found by MASTER Global Robotic Net 53 sec after receiving the
alert, making it the fastest optical detection of a GRB from a GBM error-box.
Spectroscopy obtained with the 10.4-m Gran Telescopio Canarias and the 6-m BTA
of SAO RAS reveals a redshift of $z=1.32$. We performed optical and
near-infrared photometry of GRB 140801A using different telescopes with
apertures ranging from 0.4-m to 10.4-m. GRB 140801A is a typical burst in many
ways. The rest-frame bolometric isotropic energy release and peak energy of the
burst is $E_\mathrm{iso} = 5.54_{-0.24}^{+0.26} \times 10^{52}$ erg and
$E_\mathrm{p, rest}\simeq280$ keV, respectively, which is consistent with the
Amati relation. The absence of a jet break in the optical light curve provides
a lower limit on the half-opening angle of the jet $\theta=6.1$ deg. The
observed $E_\mathrm{peak}$ is consistent with the limit derived from the
Ghirlanda relation. The joint Fermi GBM and Konus-Wind analysis shows that GRB
140801A could belong to the class of intermediate duration. The rapid detection
of the optical counterpart of GRB 140801A is especially important regarding the
upcoming experiments with large coordinate error-box areas.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6336 [pdf] - 1154767
A Missing-Link in the Supernova-GRB Connection: The Case of SN 2012ap
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Kamble, Atish;
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Hurley, Kevin;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Bietenholz, Michael;
Brunthaler, Andreas;
Pignata, Giuliano;
Pian, Elena;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Fransson, Claes;
Bartel, Norbert;
Hamuy, Mario;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Dittmann, Jason;
Krauss, Miriam;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Takahashi, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Savchenko, V.
Submitted: 2014-02-25, last modified: 2015-04-22
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are characterized by ultra-relativistic outflows,
while supernovae are generally characterized by non-relativistic ejecta. GRB
afterglows decelerate rapidly usually within days, because their low-mass
ejecta rapidly sweep up a comparatively larger mass of circumstellar material.
However supernovae, with heavy ejecta, can be in nearly free expansion for
centuries. Supernovae were thought to have non-relativistic outflows except for
few relativistic ones accompanied by GRBs. This clear division was blurred by
SN 2009bb, the first supernova with a relativistic outflow without an observed
GRB. Yet the ejecta from SN 2009bb was baryon loaded, and in nearly-free
expansion for a year, unlike GRBs. We report the first supernova discovered
without a GRB, but with rapidly decelerating mildly relativistic ejecta, SN
2012ap. We discovered a bright and rapidly evolving radio counterpart driven by
the circumstellar interaction of the relativistic ejecta. However, we did not
find any coincident GRB with an isotropic fluence of more than a sixth of the
fluence from GRB 980425. This shows for the first time that central engines in
type Ic supernovae, even without an observed GRB, can produce both relativistic
and rapidly decelerating outflows like GRBs.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.2015 [pdf] - 904750
Konus-Wind and Helicon-Coronas-F Observations of Solar Flares
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Charikov, Yu. E.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Kokomov, A. A.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Sokolova, Z. Ya.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.
Submitted: 2014-12-05
Results of solar flare observations obtained in the Konus-Wind experiment
from November, 1994 to December, 2013 and in the Helicon Coronas-F experiment
during its operation from 2001 to 2005, are presented. For the periods
indicated Konus-Wind detected in the trigger mode 834 solar flares, and
Helicon-Coronas-F detected more than 300 solar flares.
A description of the instruments and data processing techniques are given. As
an example, the analysis of the spectral evolution of the flares
SOL2012-11-08T02:19 (M 1.7) and SOL2002-03-10T01:34 (C5.1) is made with the
Konus-Wind data and the flare SOL2003-10-26T06:11 (X1.2) is analyzed in the
2.223 MeV deuterium line with the Helicon-Coronas-F data.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.5589 [pdf] - 1223273
A search for giant flares from soft gamma-repeaters in nearby galaxies
in the Konus-Wind short burst sample
Submitted: 2014-11-20
The knowledge of the rate of soft gamma-ray repeater (SGR) giant flares is
important for understanding the giant flare mechanism and the SGR energy budget
in the framework of the magnetar model. We estimate the upper limit to the rate
using the results of an extensive search for extragalactic soft gamma-repeater
giant flares (GFs) among 140 short gamma-ray bursts detected between 1994 and
2010 by Konus-Wind using InterPlanetary Network (IPN) localizations and
temporal parameters. We show that Konus-Wind and the IPN are capable of
detecting GFs with energies of 2.3x10^46 erg (which is the energy of the GF
from SGR 1806-20 assuming a distance of 15 kpc) at distances of up to about 30
Mpc and GFs with energies of <10^45 erg (which is the energy of the GF from SGR
0526-66) at distances of up to about 6 Mpc. Using a sample of 1896 nearby
galaxies we found that only two bursts, GRB 051103 and GRB 070201, have a low
chance coincidence probability between an IPN localization and a nearby galaxy.
We found the upper limit to the fraction of GFs among short GRBs with fluence
above ~5x10^-7 erg cm^-2 to be <8% (95% confidence level). Assuming that the
number of active SGRs in nearby galaxies is proportional to their core-collapse
supernova rate, we derived the one-sided 95% upper limit to the rate of GFs
with energy output similar to the GF from SGR 1806-20 to be (0.6--1.2)x10^-4
Q_46^-1.5 yr^-1 per SGR, where Q_46 is the GF energy output in 10^46 erg.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.4079 [pdf] - 1208411
GRB 130925A: an ultra-long Gamma Ray Burst with a dust-echo afterglow,
and implications for the origin of the ultra-long GRBs
Evans, P. A.;
Willingale, R.;
Osborne, J. P.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Lien, A.;
Cummings, J.;
Xiong, S.;
Zhang, B. -B.;
Götz, D.;
Savchenko, V.;
Negoro, Hitoshi;
Nakahira, Satoshi;
Suzuki, Kazuhiko;
Wiersema, K.;
Starling, R. L. C.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Sánchez-Ramírez, R.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Jeong, S.;
Kennea, J. A.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Gehrels, N.
Submitted: 2014-03-17, last modified: 2014-07-21
GRB 130925A was an unusual GRB, consisting of 3 distinct episodes of
high-energy emission spanning $\sim$20 ks, making it a member of the proposed
category of `ultra-long' bursts. It was also unusual in that its late-time
X-ray emission observed by Swift was very soft, and showed a strong
hard-to-soft spectral evolution with time. This evolution, rarely seen in GRB
afterglows, can be well modelled as the dust-scattered echo of the prompt
emission, with stringent limits on the contribution from the normal afterglow
(i.e. external shock) emission. We consider and reject the possibility that GRB
130925A was some form of tidal disruption event, and instead show that if the
circumburst density around GRB 130925A is low, the long duration of the burst
and faint external shock emission are naturally explained. Indeed, we suggest
that the ultra-long GRBs as a class can be explained as those with low
circumburst densities, such that the deceleration time (at which point the
material ejected from the nascent black hole is decelerated by the circumburst
medium) is $\sim$20 ks, as opposed to a few hundred seconds for the normal long
GRBs. The increased deceleration radius means that more of the ejected shells
can interact before reaching the external shock, naturally explaining both the
increased duration of GRB 130925A, the duration of its prompt pulses, and the
fainter-than-normal afterglow.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.4210 [pdf] - 863113
GROND coverage of the main peak of Gamma-Ray Burst 130925A
Greiner, J.;
Yu, H. -F.;
Krühler, T.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Beloborodov, A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bolmer, J.;
van Eerten, H.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Elliott, J.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Graham, J. F.;
Hurley, K.;
Kann, D. A.;
Klose, S.;
Guelbenzu, A. Nicuesa;
Rau, A.;
Schady, P.;
Schmidl, S.;
Sudilovsky, V.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Tanga, M.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Varela, K.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X. -L.
Submitted: 2014-07-16
Prompt or early optical emission in gamma-ray bursts is notoriously difficult
to measure, and observations of the dozen cases show a large variety of
properties. Yet, such early emission promises to help us achieve a better
understanding of the GRB emission process(es).
We performed dedicated observations of the ultra-long duration (T90 about
7000 s) GRB 130925A in the optical/near-infrared with the 7-channel "Gamma-Ray
Burst Optical and Near-infrared Detector" (GROND) at the 2.2m MPG/ESO
telescope. We detect an optical/NIR flare with an amplitude of nearly 2 mag
which is delayed with respect to the keV--MeV prompt emission by about 300--400
s. The decay time of this flare is shorter than the duration of the flare (500
s) or its delay.
While we cannot offer a straightforward explanation, we discuss the
implications of the flare properties and suggest ways toward understanding it.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.4139 [pdf] - 1209585
GRB 051008: A long, spectrally-hard dust-obscured GRB in a Lyman-Break
Galaxy at z ~ 2.8
Volnova, A. A.;
Pozanenko, A. S.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Perley, D. A.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Kann, D. A.;
Rumyantsev, V. V.;
Biryukov, V. V.;
Burkhonov, O.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Ferrero, P.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Klose, S.;
Loznikov, V. M.;
Minaev, P. Yu.;
Stecklum, B.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Ulanov, M. V.
Submitted: 2014-05-16
We present observations of the dark Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 051008 provided by
Swift/BAT, Swift/XRT, Konus-WIND, INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS in the high-energy domain
and the Shajn, Swift/UVOT, Tautenburg, NOT, Gemini and Keck I telescopes in the
optical and near-infrared bands. The burst was detected only in gamma- and
X-rays and neither a prompt optical nor a radio afterglow were detected down to
deep limits. We identified the host galaxy of the burst, which is a typical
Lyman-break Galaxy (LBG) with R-magnitude of 24.06 +/- 0.10. A redshift of the
galaxy of z = 2.77 (-0.20,+0.15) is measured photometrically due to the
presence of a clear, strong Lyman-break feature. The host galaxy is a small
starburst galaxy with moderate intrinsic extinction (A_V = 0.3 mag) and has a
SFR of ~ 60 M_Sun / yr typical for LBGs. It is one of the few cases where a GRB
host has been found to be a classical Lyman-break galaxy. Using the redshift we
estimate the isotropic-equivalent radiated energy of the burst to be E_iso =
(1.15 +/- 0.20) x 10^54 erg. We also provide evidence in favour of the
hypothesis that the darkness of GRB 051008 is due to local absorption resulting
from a dense circumburst medium.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.6639 [pdf] - 848128
Search for gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts detected
by the InterPlanetary Network
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Aasi, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Ajith, P.;
Alemic, A.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Amariutei, D.;
Andersen, M.;
Anderson, R. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Ast, S.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Augustus, H.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barbet, M.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belczynski, C.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biscans, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bogan, C.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, Sukanta;
Bosi, L.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brückner, F.;
Buchman, S.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burman, R.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Castaldi, G.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Celerier, C.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C.;
Colombini, M.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conte, A.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Croce, R. P.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Cutler, C.;
Dahl, K.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Damjanic, M.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dereli, H.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M.;
Dickson, J.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dolique, V.;
Dominguez, E.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edo, T.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Endrőczi, G.;
Essick, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Feroz, F.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S.;
Garufi, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Gendre, B.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Gordon, N.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Gräf, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grover, K.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C. J.;
Gushwa, K.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Ha, J.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, W.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanke, M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hart, M.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horrom, T.;
Hoske, D.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y.;
Huerta, E.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh, M.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idrisy, A.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Islas, G.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
Jang, H.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Ji, Y.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Haris;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karlen, J.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keiser, G. M.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N. G.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kline, J.;
Koehlenbeck, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, D. Nanda;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lam, P. K.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Larson, S.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, P. J.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Roux, A. Le;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Levine, B.;
Lewis, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libbrecht, K.;
Libson, A.;
Lin, A. C.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lockett, V.;
Lodhia, D.;
Loew, K.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lopez, E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Lubinski, M. J.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Ma, Y.;
Macdonald, E. P.;
MacDonald, T.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Magee, R.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Maglione, C.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Manca, G. M.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mangini, N. M.;
Mansell, G.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martinelli, L.;
Martynov, D.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
May, G.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McLin, K.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Meinders, M.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moe, B.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nagy, M. F.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Necula, V.;
Nelemans, G.;
Neri, I.;
Neri, M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A. H.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Omar, S.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, R.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ortega, W.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Padilla, C.;
Pai, A.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, H.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poeld, J.;
Poggiani, R.;
Poteomkin, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Premachandra, S.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qin, J.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajalakshmi, G.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C.;
Ramirez, K.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Recchia, S.;
Reed, C. M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Reula, O.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S. B.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sankar, S.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Saracco, E.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schilling, R.;
Schilman, M.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shah, S.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shao, Z.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sidery, T. L.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Singh, R.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Souradeep, T.;
Staley, A.;
Stebbins, J.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stevenson, S.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tao, J.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, R.;
Tellez, G.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tse, M.;
Tshilumba, D.;
Tuennermann, H.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Heijningen, J.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vincent-Finley, R.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wiesner, K.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Williams, K.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Williams, T. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Wolovick, N.;
Worden, J.;
Wu, Y.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, Fan;
Zhang, L.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhu, H.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Atteia, J. L.;
Cline, T.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Palmer, D.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Terada, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2014-03-26, last modified: 2014-04-17
We present the results of a search for gravitational waves associated with
223 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the InterPlanetary Network (IPN) in
2005-2010 during LIGO's fifth and sixth science runs and Virgo's first, second
and third science runs. The IPN satellites provide accurate times of the bursts
and sky localizations that vary significantly from degree scale to hundreds of
square degrees. We search for both a well-modeled binary coalescence signal,
the favored progenitor model for short GRBs, and for generic, unmodeled
gravitational wave bursts. Both searches use the event time and sky
localization to improve the gravitational-wave search sensitivity as compared
to corresponding all-time, all-sky searches. We find no evidence of a
gravitational-wave signal associated with any of the IPN GRBs in the sample,
nor do we find evidence for a population of weak gravitational-wave signals
associated with the GRBs. For all IPN-detected GRBs, for which a sufficient
duration of quality gravitational-wave data is available, we place lower bounds
on the distance to the source in accordance with an optimistic assumption of
gravitational-wave emission energy of $10^{-2}M_{\odot}c^2$ at 150 Hz, and find
a median of 13 Mpc. For the 27 short-hard GRBs we place 90% confidence
exclusion distances to two source models: a binary neutron star coalescence,
with a median distance of 12Mpc, or the coalescence of a neutron star and black
hole, with a median distance of 22 Mpc. Finally, we combine this search with
previously published results to provide a population statement for GRB searches
in first-generation LIGO and Virgo gravitational-wave detectors, and a
resulting examination of prospects for the advanced gravitational-wave
detectors.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5734 [pdf] - 755152
The ultraluminous GRB 110918A
Frederiks, D. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Mangano, V.;
Oates, S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, Ph. P.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Kokomov, A. V.;
Cline, T. L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Pagani, C.;
Sbarufatti, B.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
Starr, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Goldstein, J.
Submitted: 2013-11-22
GRB 110918A is the brightest long GRB detected by Konus-WIND during its 19
years of continuous observations and the most luminous GRB ever observed since
the beginning of the cosmological era in 1997. We report on the final IPN
localization of this event and its detailed multiwavelength study with a number
of space-based instruments. The prompt emission is characterized by a typical
duration, a moderare $E_{peak}$ of the time-integrated spectrum, and strong
hard-to-soft evolution. The high observed energy fluence yields, at z=0.984, a
huge isotropic-equivalent energy release $E_{iso}=(2.1\pm0.1)\times10^{54}$
erg. The record-breaking energy flux observed at the peak of the short, bright,
hard initial pulse results in an unprecedented isotropic-equivalent luminosity
$L_{iso}=(4.7\pm0.2)\times10^{54}$erg s$^{-1}$. A tail of the soft gamma-ray
emission was detected with temporal and spectral behavior typical of that
predicted by the synchrotron forward-shock model. Swift/XRT and Swift/UVOT
observed the bright afterglow from 1.2 to 48 days after the burst and revealed
no evidence of a jet break. The post-break scenario for the afterglow is
preferred from our analysis, with a hard underlying electron spectrum and
ISM-like circumburst environment implied. We conclude that, among multiple
reasons investigated, the tight collimation of the jet must have been a key
ingredient to produce this unusually bright burst. The inferred jet opening
angle of 1.7-3.4 deg results in reasonable values of the collimation-corrected
radiated energy and the peak luminosity, which, however, are still at the top
of their distributions for such tightly collimated events. We estimate a
detection horizon for a similar ultraluminous GRB of $z\sim7.5$ for Konus-WIND,
and $z\sim12$ for Swift/BAT, which stresses the importance of GRBs as probes of
the early Universe.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3740 [pdf] - 702249
IPN localizations of Konus short gamma-ray bursts
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Connaughton, V.;
Boer, M.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Amati, L.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Del Monte, E.;
Costa, E.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Pacciani, L.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Soffitta, P.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Labanti, C.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.
Submitted: 2013-01-16, last modified: 2013-08-05
Between the launch of the \textit{GGS Wind} spacecraft in 1994 November and
the end of 2010, the Konus-\textit{Wind} experiment detected 296 short-duration
gamma-ray bursts (including 23 bursts which can be classified as short bursts
with extended emission). During this period, the IPN consisted of up to eleven
spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations of 271 bursts were
obtained. We present the most comprehensive IPN localization data on these
events. The short burst detection rate, $\sim$18 per year, exceeds that of many
individual experiments.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3522 [pdf] - 1159075
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog of Cosmic
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Ohno, M.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Smith, D. M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-15, last modified: 2013-06-21
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) data for the gamma-ray bursts in the
first Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) catalog. Of the 491 bursts in that
catalog, covering 2008 July 12 to 2010 July 11, 427 were observed by at least
one other instrument in the 9-spacecraft IPN. Of the 427, the localizations of
149 could be improved by arrival time analysis (or triangulation). For any
given burst observed by the GBM and one other distant spacecraft, triangulation
gives an annulus of possible arrival directions whose half-width varies between
about 0.4' and 32 degrees, depending on the intensity, time history, and
arrival direction of the burst, as well as the distance between the spacecraft.
We find that the IPN localizations intersect the 1 sigma GBM error circles in
only 52% of the cases, if no systematic uncertainty is assumed for the latter.
If a 6 degree systematic uncertainty is assumed and added in quadrature, the
two localization samples agree about 87% of the time, as would be expected. If
we then multiply the resulting error radii by a factor of 3, the two samples
agree in slightly over 98% of the cases, providing a good estimate of the GBM 3
sigma error radius. The IPN 3 sigma error boxes have areas between about 1
square arcminute and 110 square degrees, and are, on the average, a factor of
180 smaller than the corresponding GBM localizations. We identify two bursts in
the IPN/GBM sample that did not appear in the GBM catalog. In one case, the GBM
triggered on a terrestrial gamma flash, and in the other, its origin was given
as uncertain. We also discuss the sensitivity and calibration of the IPN.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.5203 [pdf] - 617260
GRB 080407: an ultra-long burst discovered by the IPN
Pal'shin, V.;
Hurley, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Boynton, W.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cummings, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Svinkin, D.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Rau, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Zhang, X.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Del Monte, E.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-22
We present observations of the extremely long GRB 080704 obtained with the
instruments of the Interplanetary Network (IPN). The observations reveal two
distinct emission episodes, separated by a ~1500 s long period of quiescence.
The total burst duration is about 2100 s. We compare the temporal and spectral
characteristics of this burst with those obtained for other ultra-long GRBs and
discuss these characteristics in the context of different models.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.4829 [pdf] - 616849
Extremely long hard bursts observed by Konus-Wind
Pal'shin, V.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Il'Inskii, V.;
Mazets, E.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Hurley, K.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Oleynik, P.;
Ulanov, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.
Submitted: 2013-01-21
We report the observations of the prompt emission of the extremely long hard
burst, GRB 060814B, discovered by Konus-Wind and localized by the IPN. The
observations reveal a smooth, hard, ~40-min long pulse followed by weaker
emission seen several hours after the burst onset. We also present the
Konus-Wind data on similar burst, GRB 971208, localized by BATSE/IPN. And
finally we discuss the different possible origins of these unusual events.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.5636 [pdf] - 528994
Cosmic Gamma-ray Bursts Studies with Ioffe Institute Konus Experiments
Submitted: 2012-06-25
We present a short review of GRB studies performed for many years by Ioffe
Institute experiments onboard a number of space missions. The first
breakthrough in the studies of GRB was made possible by four Konus experiments
carried out by the Ioffe Institute onboard the Venera 11-14 deep space missions
from 1978 to 1983. A new important stage of our research is associated with the
joint Russian-American experiment with the Russian Konus scientific instrument
onboard the U.S. Wind spacecraft which has been successfully operating since
its launch in November 1994. The Konus-Wind experiment has made an impressive
number of important GRB observations and other astrophysical discoveries, due
to the advantages of its design and its interplanetary location. We also
briefly discuss future GRB experiments of the Ioffe Institute.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.2922 [pdf] - 730987
Unusual Central Engine Activity in the Double Burst GRB 110709B
Zhang, Bin-Bin;
Burrows, David;
Zhang, Bing;
Meszaros, Peter;
Wang, Xiang-Yu;
Stratta, Giulia;
D'Elia, Valerio;
Frederiks, Dmitry;
Golenetskii, Sergey;
Cummings, Jay R.;
Norris, Jay P.;
Falcone, Abraham;
Barthelmy, Scott D.;
Gehrels, Neil
Submitted: 2011-11-12, last modified: 2012-01-16
The double burst, GRB 110709B, triggered Swift/BAT twice at 21:32:39 UT and
21:43:45 UT, respectively, on 9 July 2011. This is the first time we observed a
GRB with two BAT triggers. In this paper, we present simultaneous Swift and
Konus-WIND observations of this unusual GRB and its afterglow. If the two
events originated from the same physical progenitor, their different
time-dependent spectral evolution suggests they must belong to different
episodes of the central engine, which may be a magnetar-to-BH accretion system.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.6470 [pdf] - 431879
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog - An AO-2
and AO-3 Guest Investigator Project
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2011-10-28
In the first two years of operation of the Fermi GBM, the 9-spacecraft
Interplanetary Network (IPN) detected 158 GBM bursts with one or two distant
spacecraft, and triangulated them to annuli or error boxes. Combining the IPN
and GBM localizations leads to error boxes which are up to 4 orders of
magnitude smaller than those of the GBM alone. These localizations comprise the
IPN supplement to the GBM catalog, and they support a wide range of scientific
investigations.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.4050 [pdf] - 1078110
Extended Tails from SGR 1806-20 Bursts
Submitted: 2011-07-20
In 2004, SGR 1806-20 underwent a period of intense and long-lasting burst
activity that included the giant flare of 27 December 2004 -- the most intense
extra-solar transient event ever detected at Earth. During this active episode,
we routinely monitored the source with Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer and
occasionally with Chandra. During the course of these observations, we
identified two relatively bright bursts observed with Konus-Wind in hard X-rays
that were followed by extended X-ray tails or afterglows lasting hundreds to
thousands of seconds. Here, we present detailed spectral and temporal analysis
of these events observed about 6 and 1.5 months prior to the 27 December 2004
Giant Flare. We find that both X-ray tails are consistent with a cooling
blackbody of constant radius. These spectral results are qualitatively similar
to those of the burst afterglows recorded from SGR 1900+14 and recently from
SGR 1550-5418. However, the latter two sources exhibit significant increase in
their pulsed X-ray intensity following the burst, while we did not detect any
significant changes in the RMS pulsed amplitude during the SGR 1806-20 events.
Moreover, we find that the fraction of energy partitioned to the burst (prompt
energy release) and the tail (afterglow) differs by an order of magnitude
between SGR 1900+14 and SGR 1806-20. We suggest that such differences can be
attributed to differences in the crustal heating mechanism of these neutron
stars combined with the geometry of the emitting areas.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.4079 [pdf] - 1941794
Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts from Six Magnetars
Abadie, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abernathy, M.;
Accadia, T.;
Acerneseac, F.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R.;
Affeldt, C.;
Allen, B.;
Allen, G. S.;
Ceron, E. Amador;
Amariutei, D.;
Amin, R. S.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Antonuccia, F.;
Arai, K.;
Arain, M. A.;
Araya, M. C.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astonea, P.;
Atkinson, D.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S.;
Barker, D.;
Barnum, S.;
Baroneac, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barriga, P.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Bastarrika, M.;
Bastiab, A.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauera, Th. S.;
Behnke, B.;
Bekera, M. G.;
Bell, A. S.;
Belletoile, A.;
Belopolski, I.;
Benacquista, M.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Beveridge, N.;
Beyersdorf, P. T.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birindellia, S.;
Biswas, R.;
Bitossia, M.;
Bizouarda, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bland, B.;
Bloma, M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Bogan, C.;
Bondarescu, R.;
Bondub, F.;
Bonelliab, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschia, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bosia, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Boyle, M.;
Braccinia, S.;
Bradaschiaa, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Brau, J. E.;
Breyer, J.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brilleta, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brissona, V.;
Britzger, M.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brummit, A.;
Budzyńskib, R.;
Bulikbc, T.;
Bultenab, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burguet--Castell, J.;
Burmeister, O.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnolia, G.;
Cain, J.;
Calloniab, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campagnaab, E.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Cannon, K.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavaliera, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cellaa, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarinib, E.;
Chaibia, O.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chalkley, E.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Christensen, N.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, C. T. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D.;
Clark, J.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Clevaa, F.;
Cocciaab, E.;
Colacinoab, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Collaab, A.;
Colombinib, M.;
Conte, R.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsia, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M.;
Coulona, J. -P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cruise, A. M.;
Culter, R. M.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Dahl, K.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
Dannenberg, R.;
D'Antonioa, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Das, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daudert, B.;
Daveloza, H.;
Daviera, M.;
Davies, G.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
De Rosaab, R.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
del Preteac, M.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Di Fiorea, L.;
Di Lietoab, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Emilioac, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilioa, A.;
Díaz, M.;
Dietz, A.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Dorsher, S.;
Douglas, E. S. D.;
Dragocd, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Dumas, J. -C.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edgar, M.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Engel, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafoneab, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, Y.;
Farr, B. F.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Ferranteab, I.;
Fidecaroab, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Flaminio, R.;
Flanigan, M.;
Foley, S.;
Forsi, E.;
Fortea, L. A.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Fourniera, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Frascaab, S.;
Frasconia, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoniab, L.;
Garcia, J.;
Garofoli, J. A.;
Garufiab, F.;
Gáspár, M. E.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennaia, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giampanis, S.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazottoa, A.;
Gill, C.;
Goetz, E.;
Goggin, L. M.;
González, G.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Greveriea, C.;
Grosso, R.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidiab, G. M.;
Guido, C.;
Gupta, R.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hage, B.;
Hallam, J. M.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayama, K.;
Hayaub, J. -F.;
Hayler, T.;
Heefner, J.;
Heitmann, H.;
Helloa, P.;
Hendry, M. A.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Herrera, V.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Holt, K.;
Hong, T.;
Hooper, S.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Jaranowskid, P.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, R.;
Ju, L.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kells, W.;
Kelner, M.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, H.;
Kim, N.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kopparapu, R.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalskab, I.;
Kozak, D.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnamurthy, S.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królakae, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, R.;
Kwee, P.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Lastzka, N.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Leaci, P.;
Leong, J.;
Leonor, I.;
Leroya, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, J.;
Lia, T. G. F.;
Liguoriab, N.;
Lindquist, P. E.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lodhia, D.;
Lorenzinia, M.;
Lorietteb, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdoa, G.;
Lu, P.;
Luan, J.;
Lubinski, M.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macdonald, E.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mailand, K.;
Majoranaa, E.;
Maksimovicb, I.;
Mana, N.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mantovaniac, M.;
Marandi, A.;
Marchesonia, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelliab, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Matzner, R. A.;
Mavalvala, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McKechan, D. J. A.;
Meadors, G.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meier, T.;
Melatos, A.;
Melissinos, A. C.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merill, L.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Milanoab, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkova, Y.;
Mino, Y.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Moe, B.;
Moesta, P.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohanty, S. D.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgiaab, A.;
Moscaab, S.;
Moscatellia, V.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow--Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Munch, J.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nash, T.;
Nawrodt, R.;
Nelson, J.;
Neriab, I.;
Newton, G.;
Nishida, E.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oldenburg, R. G.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Page, A.;
Pagliaroliac, G.;
Palladinoac, L.;
Palombaa, C.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paolettia, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parameswaran, A.;
Pardiab, S.;
Parisiab, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquietiab, R.;
Passuelloa, D.;
Patel, P.;
Pathak, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Penn, S.;
Peralta, C.;
Perreca, A.;
Persichettiab, G.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichota, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanniab, F.;
Pietkad, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Pletsch, H. J.;
Plissi, M. V.;
Podkaminer, J.;
Poggianiab, R.;
Pöld, J.;
Postiglione, F.;
Prato, M.;
Predoi, V.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodiab, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturoa, M.;
Puppoa, P.;
Quetschke, V.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabelingab, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C. R.;
Rankins, B.;
Rapagnaniab, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Reab, V.;
Redwine, K.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reed, T.;
Regimbaua, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ricciab, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Roberts, P.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robineta, F.;
Robinson, C.;
Robinson, E. L.;
Rocchia, A.;
Roddy, S.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romanoac, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińskacf, D.;
Röver, C.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sakata, S.;
Sakosky, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Salit, M.;
Sammut, L.;
de la Jordana, L. Sancho;
Sandberg, V.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santamaría, L.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Santostasi, G.;
Saraf, S.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Sato, S.;
Satterthwaite, M.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Schilling, R.;
Schlamminger, S.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schulz, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwinberg, P.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Searle, A. C.;
Seifert, F.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Weerathunga, T. Shihan;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sibley, A.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Skelton, G.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, N. D.;
Smith, R.;
Somiya, K.;
Sorazu, B.;
Soto, J.;
Speirits, F. C.;
Sperandioab, L.;
Stefszky, M.;
Stein, A. J.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stochino, A.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Strigin, S.;
Stroeer, A. S.;
Sturaniab, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sung, M.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Szokoly, G. P.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, J. R.;
Taylor, R.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Thüring, A.;
Titsler, C.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toncelliab, A.;
Tonelliab, M.;
Torreac, O.;
Torres, C.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Tournefier, E.;
Travassoab, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trias, M.;
Tseng, K.;
Turner, L.;
Ugolini, D.;
Urbanek, K.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vaishnav, B.;
Vajenteab, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Brandab, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Puttena, S.;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vavoulidisa, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovatoc, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Veltkamp, C.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetranoab, F.;
Viceréab, A.;
Villar, A. E.;
Vineta, J. -Y.;
Voccaa, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Waldman, S. J.;
Wallace, L.;
Wanner, A.;
Ward, R. L.;
Wasa, M.;
Wei, P.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wen, S.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Willems, P. A.;
Williams, H. R.;
Williams, L.;
Willke, B.;
Winkelmann, L.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Woan, G.;
Wooley, R.;
Worden, J.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yang, H.;
Yeaton-Massey, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yu, P.;
Yvert, M.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, Z.;
Zhao, C.;
Zotov, N.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Boynton, W. V.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cline, T. L.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J. O;
Golovin, D.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hurley, K. C.;
Kaneko, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Lin, L.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Ohno, M.;
Palshin, V. D.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A.;
Tashiro, M. S.;
Terada, Y.;
Yamaoka, K.
Submitted: 2010-11-17, last modified: 2011-04-15
Soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) are thought to
be magnetars: neutron stars powered by extreme magnetic fields. These rare
objects are characterized by repeated and sometimes spectacular gamma-ray
bursts. The burst mechanism might involve crustal fractures and excitation of
non-radial modes which would emit gravitational waves (GWs). We present the
results of a search for GW bursts from six galactic magnetars that is sensitive
to neutron star f-modes, thought to be the most efficient GW emitting
oscillatory modes in compact stars. One of them, SGR 0501+4516, is likely ~1
kpc from Earth, an order of magnitude closer than magnetars targeted in
previous GW searches. A second, AXP 1E 1547.0-5408, gave a burst with an
estimated isotropic energy >10^{44} erg which is comparable to the giant
flares. We find no evidence of GWs associated with a sample of 1279
electromagnetic triggers from six magnetars occurring between November 2006 and
June 2009, in GW data from the LIGO, Virgo, and GEO600 detectors. Our lowest
model-dependent GW emission energy upper limits for band- and time-limited
white noise bursts in the detector sensitive band, and for f-mode ringdowns (at
1090 Hz), are 3.0x10^{44} d_1^2 erg and 1.4x10^{47} d_1^2 erg respectively,
where d_1 = d_{0501} / 1 kpc and d_{0501} is the distance to SGR 0501+4516.
These limits on GW emission from f-modes are an order of magnitude lower than
any previous, and approach the range of electromagnetic energies seen in SGR
giant flares for the first time.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.1301 [pdf] - 1041767
Spectral Cross-calibration of the Konus-Wind, the Suzaku/WAM, and the
Swift/BAT Data using Gamma-Ray Bursts
Sakamoto, T.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Sato, G.;
Aptekar, R.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Baumgartner, W.;
Cummings, J.;
Fenimore, E.;
Frederiks, D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Krimm, H.;
Markwardt, C.;
Onda, K.;
Palmer, D.;
Parsons, A.;
Stamatikos, M.;
Sugita, S.;
Tashiro, M.;
Tueller, J.;
Ukwatta, T.
Submitted: 2010-11-04
We report on the spectral cross-calibration results of the Konus-Wind, the
Suzaku/WAM, and the Swift/BAT instruments using simultaneously observed
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). This is the first attempt to use simultaneously
observed GRBs as a spectral calibration source to understand systematic
problems among the instruments. Based on these joint spectral fits, we find
that 1) although a constant factor (a normalization factor) agrees within 20%
among the instruments, the BAT constant factor shows a systematically smaller
value by 10-20% compared to that of Konus-Wind, 2) there is a systematic trend
that the low-energy photon index becomes steeper by 0.1-0.2 and Epeak becomes
systematically higher by 10-20% when including the BAT data in the joint fits,
and 3) the high-energy photon index agrees within 0.2 among the instruments.
Our results show that cross-calibration based on joint spectral analysis is an
important step to understanding the instrumental effects which could be
affecting the scientific results from the GRB prompt emission data.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.2709 [pdf] - 231069
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the HETE-2 Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalog
Hurley, K.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Barthelmy, K. Harshman S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, C. E.;
Rossi, F.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Goldsten, R. Starr J.;
Gold, R.
Submitted: 2009-07-15, last modified: 2010-09-22
Between 2000 November and 2006 May, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network (IPN) detected 226 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were
also detected by the FREGATE experiment aboard the HETE-II spacecraft. During
this period, the IPN consisted of up to nine spacecraft, and using
triangulation, the localizations of 157 bursts were obtained. We present the
IPN localization data on these events.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.1650 [pdf] - 1026226
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalogs
Hurley, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.
Submitted: 2010-04-09
Between 1996 July and 2002 April, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network detected 787 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were also
detected by the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor and/or Wide-Field X-Ray Camera
experiments aboard the BeppoSAX spacecraft. During this period, the network
consisted of up to six spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations
of 475 bursts were obtained. We present the localization data for these events.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.5544 [pdf] - 1018545
Discovery of a new Soft Gamma Repeater: SGR J0418+5729
van der Horst, A. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Gogus, E.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Wachter, S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Granot, J.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
Woods, P. M.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J. R.;
Finger, M. H.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gelino, C. R.;
Gelino, D. M.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Hurley, K.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mazets, E. P.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Pe'er, A.;
Svinkin, D.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
van der Klis, M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Watts, A. L.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2009-11-30, last modified: 2010-01-19
On 2009 June 5, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray
Space Telescope triggered on two short, and relatively dim bursts with spectral
properties similar to Soft Gamma Repeater (SGR) bursts. Independent
localizations of the bursts by triangulation with the Konus-RF and with the
Swift satellite, confirmed their origin from the same, previously unknown,
source. The subsequent discovery of X-ray pulsations with the Rossi X-ray
Timing Explorer (RXTE), confirmed the magnetar nature of the new source, SGR
J0418+5729. We describe here the Fermi/GBM observations, the discovery and the
localization of this new SGR, and our infrared and Chandra X-ray observations.
We also present a detailed temporal and spectral study of the two GBM bursts.
SGR J0418+5729 is the second source discovered in the same region of the sky in
the last year, the other one being SGR J0501+4516. Both sources lie in the
direction of the galactic anti-center and presumably at the nearby distance of
~2 kpc (assuming they reside in the Perseus arm of our galaxy). The
near-threshold GBM detection of bursts from SGR J0418+5729 suggests that there
may be more such dim SGRs throughout our galaxy, possibly exceeding the
population of bright SGRs. Finally, using sample statistics, we conclude that
the implications of the new SGR discovery on the number of observable active
magnetars in our galaxy at any given time is <10, in agreement with our earlier
estimates.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.4294 [pdf] - 32118
Integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor into the 3rd
Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2009-12-21
We are integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) into the
Interplanetary Network (IPN) of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) detectors. With the GBM,
the IPN will comprise 9 experiments. This will 1) assist the Fermi team in
understanding and reducing their systematic localization uncertainties, 2)
reduce the sizes of the GBM and Large Area Telescope (LAT) error circles by 1
to 4 orders of magnitude, 3) facilitate the identification of GRB sources with
objects found by ground- and space-based observatories at other wavelengths,
from the radio to very high energy gamma-rays, 4) reduce the uncertainties in
associating some LAT detections of high energy photons with GBM bursts, and 5)
facilitate searches for non-electromagnetic GRB counterparts, particularly
neutrinos and gravitational radiation. We present examples and demonstrate the
synergy between Fermi and the IPN. This is a Fermi Cycle 2 Guest Investigator
project.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:0902.3391 [pdf] - 315634
Konus-Wind observations of the new soft gamma-ray repeater SGR 0501+4516
Submitted: 2009-02-19, last modified: 2009-05-12
In 2008 August, the new soft gamma-ray repeater SGR 0501+4516 was discovered
by Swift. The source was soon confirmed by several groups in space- and
ground-based multi-wavelength observations. In this letter we report the
analysis of five short bursts from the recently discovered SGR, detected with
Konus-Wind gamma-ray burst spectrometer. Properties of the time histories of
the observed events, as well as results of multi-channel spectral analysis,
both in the 20--300 keV energy range, show, that the source exhibits itself as
a typical SGR. The bursts durations are <0.75 s and their spectra above 20 keV
can be fitted by optically-thin thermal bremsstrahlung (OTTB) model with kT of
20--40 keV. The spectral evolution is observed, which resembles the SGR 1627-41
bursts, where a strong hardness-intensity correlation was noticed in the
earlier Konus-Wind observations. The peak energy fluxes of all five events are
comparable to highest those for known SGRs, so a less distant source is
implied, consistent with the determined Galactic anti-center direction.
Supposing the young supernova remnant HB9 (at the distance of 1.5 kpc) as a
natal environment of the source, the peak luminosities of the bursts are
estimated to be (2--5)x10^{40} erg s-1. The values of the total energy release,
given the same assumptions, amount to (0.6--6)x10^{39} erg. These estimations
of both parameters are typical for short SGR bursts.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.1557 [pdf] - 163055
GRB 080319B: A Naked-Eye Stellar Blast from the Distant Universe
Racusin, J. L.;
Karpov, S. V.;
Sokolowski, M.;
Granot, J.;
Wu, X. F.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Covino, S.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Oates, S. R.;
Schady, P.;
Smith, R. J.;
Cummings, J.;
Starling, R. L. C.;
Piotrowski, L. W.;
Zhang, B.;
Evans, P. A.;
Holland, S. T.;
Malek, K.;
Page, M. T.;
Vetere, L.;
Margutti, R.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Kamble, A.;
Curran, P. A.;
Beardmore, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Mankiewicz, L.;
Melandri, A.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Page, K. L.;
Piran, T.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Wrochna, G.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Bartolini, C.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Beskin, G. M.;
Bondar, S.;
Campana, S.;
Cucchiara, A.;
Cwiok, M.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
D'Elia, V.;
Della Valle, M.;
Dominik, W.;
Falcone, A.;
Fiore, F.;
Fox, D. B.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Fugazza, D.;
Garrett, M.;
Gehrels, N.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Gomboc, A.;
Greco, G.;
Guarnieri, A.;
Immler, S.;
Kasprowicz, G.;
Levan, A. J.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Molinari, E.;
Moretti, A.;
Nawrocki, K.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Pagani, C.;
Paragi, Z.;
Perri, M.;
Piccioni, A.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
Roming, P. W. A.;
Steele, I. A.;
Strom, R. G.;
Testa, V.;
Tosti, G.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Wiersema, K.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Zarnecki, A. F.;
Zerbi, F.;
Meszaros, P.;
Chincarini, G.;
Burrows, D. N.
Submitted: 2008-05-11
Long duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) release copious amounts of energy
across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, and so provide a window into the
process of black hole formation from the collapse of a massive star. Over the
last forty years, our understanding of the GRB phenomenon has progressed
dramatically; nevertheless, fortuitous circumstances occasionally arise that
provide access to a regime not yet probed. GRB 080319B presented such an
opportunity, with extraordinarily bright prompt optical emission that peaked at
a visual magnitude of 5.3, making it briefly visible with the naked eye. It was
captured in exquisite detail by wide-field telescopes, imaging the burst
location from before the time of the explosion. The combination of these unique
optical data with simultaneous gamma-ray observations provides powerful
diagnostics of the detailed physics of this explosion within seconds of its
formation. Here we show that the prompt optical and gamma-ray emissions from
this event likely arise from different spectral components within the same
physical region located at a large distance from the source, implying an
extremely relativistic outflow. The chromatic behaviour of the broadband
afterglow is consistent with viewing the GRB down the very narrow inner core of
a two-component jet that is expanding into a wind-like environment consistent
with the massive star origin of long GRBs. These circumstances can explain the
extreme properties of this GRB.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:0801.2432 [pdf] - 1530019
Spectral Properties of Prompt Emission of Four Short Gamma-Ray Bursts
Observed by the Suzaku-WAM and the Konus-Wind
Ohno, Masanori;
Fukazawa, Yasushi;
Takahashi, Takuya;
Yamaoka, Kazutaka;
Sugita, Satoshi;
Pal'shin, Valentin;
Sakamoto, Takanori;
Sato, Goro;
Hurley, Kevin;
Frederiks, Dmitry;
Oleynik, Philipp;
Ulanov, Mikhail;
Tashiro, Makoto;
Urata, Yuji;
Onda, Kaori;
Tamagawa, Toru;
Terada, Yukikatsu;
Suzuki, Motoko;
Soojing, Hong
Submitted: 2008-01-16
We have performed a joint analysis of prompt emission from four bright short
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with the Suzaku-WAM and the Konus-Wind experiments.
This joint analysis allows us to investigate the spectral properties of
short-duration bursts over a wider energy band with a higher accuracy. We find
that these bursts have a high E$_{\rm peak}$, around 1 MeV and have a harder
power-law component than that of long GRBs. However, we can not determine
whether these spectra follow the cut-off power-law model or the Band model. We
also investigated the spectral lag, hardness ratio, inferred isotropic
radiation energy and existence of a soft emission hump, in order to classify
them into short or long GRBs using several criteria, in addition to the burst
duration. We find that all criteria, except for the existence of the soft hump,
support the fact that our four GRB samples are correctly classified as
belonging to the short class. In addition, our broad-band analysis revealed
that there is no evidence of GRBs with a very large hardness ratio, as seen in
the BATSE short GRB sample, and that the spectral lag of our four short GRBs is
consistent with zero, even in the MeV energy band, unlike long GRBs. Although
our short GRB samples are still limited, these results suggest that the
spectral hardness of short GRBs might not differ significantly from that of
long GRBs, and also that the spectral lag at high energies could be a strong
criterion for burst classification.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.1502 [pdf] - 359849
A Giant Flare from a Soft Gamma Repeater in the Andromeda Galaxy, M31
Submitted: 2007-12-10
The light curve, energy spectra, energetics, and IPN localization of an
exceedingly intense short duration hard spectrum burst, GRB 070201, obtained
from Konus-Wind, INTEGRAL (SPI-ACS), and MESSENGER data are presented. The
total fluence of the burst and the peak flux are $S = 2.00_{-0.26}^{+0.10}
\times 10^{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ and $F_{max} = 1.61_{-0.50}^{+0.29} \times
10^{-3}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The IPN error box has an area of 446 square
arcminutes and covers the peripheral part of the M31 galaxy. Assuming that the
source of the burst is indeed in M31 at a distance of 0.78 Mpc, the measured
values of the fluence $S$ and maximum flux $F_{max}$ correspond to a total
energy of $Q = 1.5 \times 10^{45}$ erg, and a maximum luminosity $L = 1.2
\times 10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$. These data are in good agreement with the
corresponding characteristics of the previously observed giant flares from
other soft gamma repeaters. The evidence for the identification of this event
as a giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the M31 galaxy is presented.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612494 [pdf] - 260839
Panchromatic study of GRB 060124: from precursor to afterglow
Romano, P.;
Campana, S.;
Chincarini, G.;
Cummings, J.;
Cusumano, G.;
Holland, S. T.;
Mangano, V.;
Mineo, T.;
Page, K. L.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Rol, E.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Zhang, B.;
Aptekar, R.;
Barbier, S.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Boyd, P.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Capalbi, M.;
Fenimore, E. E.;
Frederiks, D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Giommi, P.;
Goad, M. R.;
Godet, O.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Guetta, D.;
Kennea, J. A.;
La Parola, V.;
Malesani, D.;
Marshall, F.;
Moretti, A.;
Nousek, J. A.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Perri, M.;
Tagliaferri, G.
Submitted: 2006-12-18, last modified: 2007-07-06
We present observations of GRB 060124, the first event for which both the
prompt and the afterglow emission could be observed simultaneously and in their
entirety by the three Swift instruments and by Konus-Wind. Thanks to these
exceptional circumstances, the temporal and spectral properties of the prompt
emission could be studied in the optical, X-ray and gamma-ray ranges (up to 2
MeV). While the X-ray emission (0.2-10 keV) clearly tracks the gamma-ray burst,
the optical component follows a different pattern, likely indicating a
different origin, possibly the onset of external shocks. The prompt GRB
spectrum shows significant spectral evolution, with both the peak energy and
the spectral index varying. As observed in several long GRBs, significant lags
are measured between the hard- and low-energy components, showing that this
behaviour extends over 3 decades in energy. The GRB peaks are also much broader
at soft energies. This is related to the temporal evolution of the spectrum,
and can be accounted for by the softening of the electron spectral index with
time. The burst energy (E_iso~5x10^{53} erg at z=2.297) and average peak energy
(E_p~300 keV) make GRB 060124 consistent with the Amati relation. The X-ray
afterglow is characterized by a decay which presents a break at t_b~10^5s.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612289 [pdf] - 87627
Giant Flare in SGR 1806-20 and Its Compton Reflection from the Moon
Submitted: 2006-12-12
We analyze the data obtained when the Konus-Wind gamma-ray spectrometer
detected a giant flare in SGR 1806-20 on December 27, 2004. The flare is
similar in appearance to the two known flares in SGR 0526-66 and SGR 1900+14
while exceeding them significantly in intensity. The enormous X-ray and
gamma-ray flux in the narrow initial pulse of the flare leads to almost
instantaneous deep saturation of the gamma-ray detectors, ruling out the
possibility of directly measuring the intensity, time profile, and energy
spectrum of the initial pulse. In this situation, the detection of an
attenuated signal of Compton back-scattering of the initial pulse emission by
the Moon with the Helicon gamma-ray spectrometer onboard the Coronas-F
satellite was an extremely favorable circumstance. Analysis of this signal has
yielded the most reliable temporal, energy, and spectral characteristics of the
pulse. The temporal and spectral characteristics of the pulsating flare tail
have been determined from Konus-Wind data. Its soft spectra have been found to
contain also a hard power-law component extending to 10 MeV. A weak afterglow
of SGR 1806-20 decaying over several hours is traceable up to 1 MeV. We also
consider the overall picture of activity of SGR 1806-20 in the emission of
recurrent bursts before and after the giant flare.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609544 [pdf] - 85136
On the Possibility of Identification of a Short/Hard Burst GRB 051103
with the Giant Flare from a Soft Gamma Repeater in the M81 Group of Galaxies
Submitted: 2006-09-19, last modified: 2006-09-22
The light curve, energy characteristics, and localization of a short/hard GRB
051103 burst are considered. Evidence in favor of identifying this event with a
giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the nearby M81 group of interacting
galaxies is discussed.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0608183 [pdf] - 163533
Multi-Wavelength Observations of GRB 050820A: An Exceptionally Energetic
Event Followed from Start to Finish
Cenko, S. B.;
Kasliwal, M.;
Harrison, F. A.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frail, D. A.;
Cameron, P. B.;
Berger, E.;
Fox, D. B.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Moon, D. -S.;
Nakar, E.;
Ofek, E. O.;
Penprase, B. E.;
Price, P. A.;
Sari, R.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Gehrels, N.;
McCarthy, P. J.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Persson, S. E.;
Piran, T.
Submitted: 2006-08-08
We present observations of the unusually bright and long gamma-ray burst GRB
050820A, one of the best-sampled broadband data sets in the Swift era. The
gamma-ray light curve is marked by a soft precursor pulse some 200 s before the
main event; the lack of any intervening emission suggests that it is due to a
physical mechanism distinct from the GRB itself. The large time lag between the
precursor and the main emission enabled simultaneous observations in the
gamma-ray, X-ray, and optical band-passes, something only achieved for a
handful of events to date. While the contemporaneous X-rays are the low-energy
tail of the prompt emission, the optical does not directly track the gamma-ray
flux. Instead, the early-time optical data appear mostly consistent with the
forward shock synchrotron peak passing through the optical, and are therefore
likely the beginning of the afterglow. On hour time scales after the burst, the
X-ray and optical light curves are inconsistent with an adiabatic expansion of
the shock into the surrounding region, but rather indicate that there is a
period of energy injection. Observations at late times allow us to constrain
the collimation angle of the relativistic outflow to theta = 6.8 - 9.3 degrees.
Our estimates of both the kinetic energy of the afterglow and the prompt
gamma-ray energy release make GRB 050820A one of the most energetic events for
which such values could be determined.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605005 [pdf] - 81693
GRB 060313: A New Paradigm for Short-Hard Bursts?
Roming, Peter W. A.;
Berk, Daniel Vanden;
Palshin, Valentin;
Pagani, Claudio;
Norris, Jay;
Kumar, Pawan;
Krimm, Hans;
Holland, Stephen T.;
Gronwall, Caryl;
Blustin, A lex J.;
Zhang, Bing;
Schady, Patricia;
Sakamoto, Takanori;
Osborne, Julian P.;
Nousek, John A.;
Marshall, Frank E.;
Meszaros, Peter;
Golenetskii, Sergey V.;
Gehrels, Neil;
Frederiks, Dmitry D.;
Campana, Sergio;
Burrows, David N.;
Boyd, Patricia T.;
Barthelmy, Scott;
Aptekar, R. L.
Submitted: 2006-04-28, last modified: 2006-08-03
We report the simultaneous observations of the prompt emission in the
gamma-ray and hard X-ray bands by the Swift-BAT and the KONUS-Wind instruments
of the short-hard burst, GRB 060313. The observations reveal multiple peaks in
both the gamma-ray and hard X-ray bands suggesting a highly variable outflow
from the central explosion. We also describe the early-time observations of the
X-ray and UV/Optical afterglows by the Swift XRT and UVOT instruments. The
combination of the X-ray and UV/Optical observations provide the most
comprehensive lightcurves to date of a short-hard burst at such an early epoch.
The afterglows exhibit complex structure with different decay indices and
flaring. This behavior can be explained by the combination of a structured jet,
radiative loss of energy, and decreasing microphysics parameters occurring in a
circum-burst medium with densities varying by a factor of approximately two on
a length scale of 10^17 cm. These density variations are normally associated
with the environment of a massive star and inhomogeneities in its windy medium.
However, the mean density of the observed medium (n approximately 10^−4
cm^3) is much less than that expected for a massive star. Although the collapse
of a massive star as the origin of GRB 060313 is unlikely, the merger of a
compact binary also poses problems for explaining the behavior of this burst.
Two possible suggestions for explaining this scenario are: some short bursts
may arise from a mechanism that does not invoke the conventional compact binary
model, or soft late-time central engine activity is producing UV/optical but no
X-ray flaring.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0602497 [pdf] - 133747
Panchromatic study of GRB 060124: from precursor to afterglow
Romano, P.;
Campana, S.;
Chincarini, G.;
Cummings, J.;
Cusumano, G.;
Holland, S. T.;
Mangano, V.;
Mineo, T.;
Page, K. L.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Rol, E.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Zhang, B.;
Aptekar, R.;
Barbier, S.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Boyd, P.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Capalbi, M.;
Fenimore, E. E.;
Frederiks, D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Giommi, P.;
Goad, M. R.;
Godet, O.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Guetta, D.;
Kennea, J. A.;
La Parola, V.;
Malesani, D.;
Marshall, F.;
Moretti, A.;
Nousek, J. A.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Perri, M.;
Tagliaferri, G.
Submitted: 2006-02-23, last modified: 2006-06-13
We present observations of GRB 060124, the first event for which both the
prompt and the afterglow emission could be observed simultaneously and in their
entirety by the three Swift instruments. Indeed, Swift-BAT triggered on a
precursor ~570s before the main burst peak, and this allowed Swift to repoint
the narrow field instruments to the burst position ~350s before the main burst
occurred. GRB 060124 also triggered Konus-Wind, which observed the prompt
emission in a harder gamma-ray band (up to 2MeV). Thanks to these exceptional
circumstances, the temporal and spectral properties of the prompt emission can
be studied in the optical, X-ray and gamma-ray ranges. While the X-ray emission
(0.2-10keV) clearly tracks the gamma-ray burst, the optical component follows a
different pattern, likely indicating a different origin, possibly the onset of
external shocks. The prompt GRB spectrum shows significant spectral evolution,
with both the peak energy and the spectral index varying. As observed in
several long GRBs, significant lags are measured between the hard- and
low-energy components, showing that this behaviour extends over 3 decades in
energy. The GRB peaks are also much broader at soft energies. This is related
to the temporal evolution of the spectrum, and can be accounted for by assuming
that the electron spectral index softened with time. The burst energy
(E_iso~5x10^{53} erg) and average peak energy (E_p~300keV) make GRB 060124
consistent with the Amati relation. The X-ray afterglow is characterized by a
decay which presents a break at t_b~10^5s.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502541 [pdf] - 71332
The Konus-Wind and Helicon-Coronas-F detection of the giant $\gamma$-ray
flare from the soft $\gamma$-ray repeater SGR 1806-20
Submitted: 2005-02-25
The giant outburst from SGR 1806-20 was observed on 2004 December 27 by many
spacecraft. This extremely rare event exhibits a striking similarity to the two
giant outbursts thus far observed, on 1979 March 5 from SGR 0526-66 and 1998
August 27 from SGR 1900+14. All the three outbursts start with a short giant
radiation pulse followed by a weaker tail. The tail pulsates with the period of
neutron star rotation of $\sim$5--8 s, to decay finally in a few minutes. The
enormous intensity of the initial pulse proved to be far above the saturation
level of the gamma-ray detectors, with the result that the most valuable data
on the time structure and energy spectrum of the pulse is lost. At the time of
the December 27 outburst, a Russian spacecraft Coronas-F with a $\gamma$-ray
spectrometer aboard was occulted by the Earth and could not see the outburst.
It succeeded, however, in observing a weak reflected signal due to the
$\gamma$-rays Compton scattered by the Moon. This has been the first
observation of a cosmic gamma-ray flare reflected from a celestial body. Here
we report, that the detection of a weakened back-scattered initial pulse
combined with direct observations by the Konus $\gamma$-ray spectrometer on the
Wind spacecraft permitted us to reliably reconstruct the intensity, time
history, and energy spectra of the outburst.
[54]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0212507 [pdf] - 53897
Observations of giant outbursts from Cygnus X-1
Submitted: 2002-12-20, last modified: 2003-07-10
We present interplanetary network localization, spectral, and time history
information for 7 episodes of exceptionally intense gamma-ray emission from
Cygnus X-1. The outbursts occurred between 1995 and 2003, with durations up to
\~28000 seconds. The observed 15 - 300 keV peak fluxes and fluences reached
3E-7 erg /cm2 s, and 8E-4 erg / cm2 respectively. By combining the
triangulations of these outbursts we derive an ~1700 square arcminute (3 sigma)
error ellipse which contains Cygnus X-1 and no other known high energy sources.
The outbursts reported here occurred both when Cyg X-1 was in the hard state as
well as in the soft one, and at various orbital phases. The spectral data
indicate that these outbursts display the same parameters as those of the
underlying hard and soft states, suggesting that they represent another
manifestation of these states.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0306091 [pdf] - 57172
The 2001 April Burst Activation of SGR 1900+14: X-ray afterglow emission
Feroci, M.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Woods, P.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Costa, E.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Mazets, E.;
Soffitta, P.;
Tavani, M.
Submitted: 2003-06-04
After nearly two years of quiescence, the soft gamma-ray repeater SGR 1900+14
again became burst-active on April 18 2001, when it emitted a large flare,
preceded by few weak and soft short bursts. After having detected the X and
gamma prompt emission of the flare, BeppoSAX pointed its narrow field X-ray
telescopes to the source in less than 8 hours. In this paper we present an
analysis of the data from this and from a subsequent BeppoSAX observation, as
well as from a set of RossiXTE observations. Our data show the detection of an
X-ray afterglow from the source, most likely related to the large hard X-ray
flare. In fact, the persistent flux from the source, in 2-10 keV, was initially
found at a level $\sim$5 times higher than the usual value. Assuming an
underlying persistent (constant) emission, the decay of the excess flux can be
reasonably well described by a t$^{-0.9}$ law. A temporal feature - a
$\sim$half a day long bump - is observed in the decay light curve approximately
one day after the burst onset. This feature is unprecedented in SGR afterglows.
We discuss our results in the context of previous observations of this source
and derive implications for the physics of these objects.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301577 [pdf] - 54548
An Extended Burst Tail from SGR 1900+14 with a Thermal X-ray Spectrum
Submitted: 2003-01-29, last modified: 2003-02-18
The Soft Gamma Repeater, SGR 1900+14, entered a new phase of activity in
April 2001 initiated by the intermediate flare recorded on April 18. Ten days
following this flare, we discovered an abrupt increase in the source flux
between consecutive RXTE orbits. This X-ray flux excess decayed over the next
several minutes and was subsequently linked to a high fluence burst from SGR
1900+14 recorded by other spacecraft (Ulysses and KONUS) while the SGR was
Earth-occulted for RXTE. We present here spectral and temporal analysis of both
the burst of 28 April and the long X-ray tail following it. We find strong
evidence of an exclusively thermal X-ray tail in this event and bring this
evidence to bear on other bursts and flares from SGR 1900+14 which have shown
extended X-ray excesses (e.g. 1998 August 29). We include in this comparison a
discussion of the physical origins of SGR bursts and extended X-ray tails.
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301318 [pdf] - 54289
Early Hard X-ray Afterglows of Short GRBs with Konus Experiments
Submitted: 2003-01-16
For a ten of 125 short GRBs observed by Konus-Wind and the Konus-A the
existance of statistically significant flux of hard photons accompanying
initial event for a time of tens to hundred seconds after the trigger was
revealed. Temporal, spectral, and energetic characteristics of these events are
presented. The statistical analysis of the whole burst sample reveals that the
afterglow is a more common feature of short GRBs.
[58]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0209219 [pdf] - 51625
Konus catalog of short GRBs
Submitted: 2002-09-11
Observational data on the short GRBs obtained with the GGS-Wind Konus
experiment in the period from 1994 to 2002 are presented. The catalog currently
includes 130 events, detailing their appearance rate, time histories, and
energy spectra. Evidence of an early X-ray and gamma-ray afterglow for some of
the short GRBs is discussed. The catalog is available electronically at
http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/shortGRBs/Catalog/
[59]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0107188 [pdf] - 43559
Afterglow upper limits for four short duration, hard spectrum gamma-ray
bursts
Hurley, K.;
Berger, E.;
Castro-Tirado, A.;
Cerón, J. M. Castro;
Cline, T.;
Feroci, M.;
Frail, D. A.;
Frontera, F.;
Masetti, N.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Hartmann, D. H.;
Henden, A.;
Levine, S. E.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D.;
Morrison, G.;
Oksanen, A.;
Moilanen, M.;
Park, H. -S.;
Price, P. A.;
Prochaska, J.;
Trombka, J.;
Williams, G.
Submitted: 2001-07-10, last modified: 2001-11-01
We present interplanetary network localization, spectral, and time history
information for four short-duration, hard spectrum gamma-ray bursts, GRB000607,
001025B, 001204, and 010119. All of these events were followed up with
sensitive radio and optical observations (the first and only such bursts to be
followed up in the radio to date), but no detections were made, demonstrating
that the short bursts do not have anomalously intense afterglows. We discuss
the upper limits, and show that the lack of observable counterparts is
consistent both with the hypothesis that the afterglow behavior of the short
bursts is like that of the long duration bursts, many of which similarly have
no detectable afterglows, as well as with the hypothesis that the short bursts
have no detectable afterglows at all. Small number statistics do not allow a
clear choice between these alternatives, but given the present detection rates
of various missions, we show that progress can be expected in the near future.
[60]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0102170 [pdf] - 40881
On the Fast Spectral Variability of GRBs
Submitted: 2001-02-09
Fast spectral variability of gamma-ray burst emission is considered for a
number of events seen by the Konus-Wind experiment. The variability manifests
itself as a strong correlation between instantaneous energy flux $F$ and peak
energy $E_p$. In the ($F,E_p$) plane, the correlation produces distinct tracks
in the form of branches and loops representing the different parts of a burst
time history. Despite the variety of features seen in different events, the
main characteristics of the spectral evolution produce a quite consistent
pattern.
[61]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0102168 [pdf] - 40879
General Properties of Recurrent Bursts from SGRs
Submitted: 2001-02-09
General properties of SGR bursts are considered using observational data
collected in the Konus catalog of SGR activity.
[62]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0004402 [pdf] - 35761
Konus catalog of SGR activity to 2000
Submitted: 2000-04-28
Observational data on the bursting activity of all five known Soft Gamma
Repeaters are presented. This information was obtained with Konus gamma-ray
burst experiments on board Venera 11-14, Wind, and Kosmos-2326 spacecraft in
the period from 1978 to 2000. These data on appearance rates, time histories,
and energy spectra of repeated soft bursts obtained with similar instruments
and collected together in a comparable form should be useful for further
studies of SGRs. (available at http://www.ioffe.rssi.ru/LEA/SGR/Catalog/).
[63]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0002116 [pdf] - 34459
Interplanetary Network Localization of GRB991208 and the Discovery of
its Afterglow
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Mazets, E.;
Aptekar, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D.;
Frail, D.;
Kulkarni, S.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.
Submitted: 2000-02-04, last modified: 2000-03-16
The extremely energetic (~10^-4 erg/cm^2) gamma-ray burst (GRB) of 1999
December 8 was triangulated to a ~14 sq. arcmin. error box ~1.8 d after its
arrival at Earth with the 3rd interplanetary network (IPN), consisting of the
Ulysses, Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR), and WIND spacecraft. Radio
observations with the Very Large Array ~2.7 d after the burst revealed a bright
fading counterpart whose position is consistent with that of an optical
transient source whose redshift is z=0.707. We present the time history, peak
flux, fluence, and refined 1.3 sq. arcmin. error box of this event, and discuss
its energetics. This is the first time that a counterpart has been found for a
GRB localized only by the IPN.
[64]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9909054 [pdf] - 108090
Observations of a possible new soft gamma repeater, SGR1801-23
Submitted: 1999-09-02
We report on two observations of a soft bursting source in 1997 June, whose
time histories and energy spectra are consistent with those of the soft gamma
repeaters. The source can only be localized to an ~3.8 degree long error box in
the direction of the Galactic center, whose area is ~ 80 sq. arcmin. The
location of the source, while not consistent with that of any of the four known
soft repeaters, is consistent with those of several known and possible
supernova remnants.
[65]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9906020 [pdf] - 106741
Where is SGR1806-20?
Submitted: 1999-06-01, last modified: 1999-07-08
We apply a statistical method to derive very precise locations for soft gamma
repeaters using data from the interplanetary network. We demonstrate the
validity of the method by deriving a 600 arcsec^2 error ellipse for SGR1900+14
whose center agrees well with the VLA source position. We then apply it to
SGR1806-20, for which we obtain a 230 arcsec^2 error ellipse, the smallest
burst error box to date. We find that the most likely position of the source
has a small but significant displacement from that of the non-thermal core of
the radio supernova remnant G10.0-0.3, which was previously thought to be the
position of the repeater. We propose a different model to explain the changing
supernova remnant morphology and the positions of the luminous blue variable
and the bursting source.
[66]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9905195 [pdf] - 1943624
The Activity of the Soft Gamma Repeater SGR~1900+14 in 1998 from
Konus-Wind Observations: 1. Short Recurrent Bursts
Submitted: 1999-05-15, last modified: 1999-05-21
Results are presented of the observations of the soft gamma repeater SGR
1900+14 made on the Wind spacecraft during the source reactivation period from
May 1998 to January 1999. Individual characteristics of recurrent bursts, such
as their time histories, energy spectra, and maximum and integrated energy
fluxes, are considered. Some statistical distributions and relationships are
also presented. The close similarity of these events to the recurrent bursts
observed from other SGRs argues for a common emission mechanism.
[67]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9905196 [pdf] - 106522
Activity of the Soft Gamma Repeater SGR 1900+14 in 1998 from Konus-Wind
Observations: 2. The Giant August 27 Outburst
Submitted: 1999-05-15, last modified: 1999-05-21
The results of observations of the giant 1998 August 27 outburst in SGR
1900+14 are presented. A comparison is made of the two extremely intense events
on August 27, 1998 and March 5, 1979. The striking similarity between the
outbursts strongly implies a common nature. The observation of two giant
outbursts within 20 years from different sources suggests that such events
occur in an SGR once every 50-100 years.
[68]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9902292 [pdf] - 1943620
Unusual Burst Emission from the New Soft Gamma Repeater SGR1627-41
Submitted: 1999-02-19
In June-July,1998 the Konus-Wind burst spectrometer observed a series of
bursts from the new soft gamma repeater SGR1627-41. Time histories and energy
spectra of the bursts have been studied, revealing fluences and peak fluxes in
the ranges of 3x10^{-7} - 7.5x10^{-6} erg cm^{-2} and 10^{-5} - 10^{-4}erg
cm^{-2}/s respectively. One event, 18 June 6153.5sUT stands out dramatically
from this series. Its fluence is ~7x10^{-4} erg cm^{-2} and peak flux
~2x10^{-2} erg cm^{-2}/s. These values from a source at a distance of 5.8 kpc
yield an energy output of ~3x10^{42}erg and maximum luminosity of ~8x10^{43}
erg/s, similar to the values for the famous March 5, 1979 and August27,1998
events. In terms of energy, this event is another giant outburst seen in a
third SGR! However, this very energetic burst differs significantly from the
other giant outbursts. It exhibits no separate initial pulse with a fast rise
time, no extended tail, and no pulsations. It is rather similar to ordinary
repeated bursts but is a few hundred times stronger in intensity. According to
the magnetar model by Thompson and Duncan (1995) such a burst may be initiated
by a strong starquake when a crust fracture propagates over the whole surface
of a neutron star.
[69]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9811443 [pdf] - 104069
A giant, periodic flare from the soft gamma repeater SGR1900+14
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Mazets, E.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Butterworth, P.;
Marshall, F.;
Palmer, D.;
Aptekar, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Il'Inskii, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
McTiernan, J.;
Gold, R.;
Trombka, J.
Submitted: 1998-11-27
Soft gamma repeaters are high-energy transient sources associated with
neutron stars in young supernova remnants. They emit sporadic, short (~ 0.1 s)
bursts with soft energy spectra during periods of intense activity. The event
of March 5, 1979 was the most intense and the only clearly periodic one to
date. Here we report on an even more intense burst on August 27, 1998, from a
different soft gamma repeater, which displayed a hard energy spectrum at its
peak, and was followed by a ~300 s long tail with a soft energy spectrum and a
dramatic 5.16 s period. Its peak and time integrated energy fluxes at Earth are
the largest yet observed from any cosmic source. This event was probably
initiated by a massive disruption of the neutron star crust, followed by an
outflow of energetic particles rotating with the period of the star. Comparison
of these two bursts supports the idea that magnetic energy plays an important
role, and that such giant flares, while rare, are not unique, and may occur at
any time in the neutron star's activity cycle.
