Normalized to: Franco, F.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.06325 [pdf] - 2130981
Constraining the growth rate of structure with phase correlations
Submitted: 2020-05-13, last modified: 2020-07-07
We show that correlations between the phases of the galaxy density field in
redshift space provide additional information about the growth rate of
large-scale structure that is complementary to the power spectrum multipoles.
In particular, we consider the multipoles of the line correlation function
(LCF), which correlates phases between three collinear points, and use the
Fisher forecasting method to show that the LCF multipoles can break the
degeneracy between the measurement of the growth rate of structure $f$ and the
amplitude of perturbations $\sigma_8$ that is present in the power spectrum
multipoles at large scales. This leads to an improvement in the measurement of
$f$ and $\sigma_8$ by up to 220 per cent for $k_{\rm max} = 0.15 \,
h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ and up to 50 per cent for $k_{\rm max} = 0.30 \,
h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ at redshift $z=0.25$, with respect to power spectrum
measurements alone for the upcoming generation of galaxy surveys like DESI and
Euclid. The average improvements in the constraints on $f$ and $\sigma_8$ for
$k_{\rm max} = 0.15 \, h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ are $\sim 90$ per cent for the DESI
BGS sample with mean redshift $\overline{z}=0.25$, $\sim 40$ per cent for the
DESI ELG sample with $\overline{z}=1.25$, and $\sim 40$ per cent for the Euclid
H$\alpha$ galaxies with $\overline{z}=1.3$. For $k_{\rm max} = 0.30 \,
h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, the average improvements are $\sim 40$ per cent for the
DESI BGS sample and $\sim 20$ per cent for both the DESI ELG and Euclid
H$\alpha$ galaxies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.06457 [pdf] - 2077510
A null test of the equivalence principle using relativistic effects in
galaxy surveys
Submitted: 2020-04-14
The weak equivalence principle is one of the cornerstone of general
relativity. Its validity has been tested with impressive precision in the Solar
System, with experiments involving baryonic matter and light. However, on
cosmological scales and when dark matter is concerned, the validity of this
principle is still unknown. In this paper we construct a null test that probes
the validity of the equivalence principle for dark matter. Our test has the
strong advantage that it can be applied on data without relying on any
modelling of the theory of gravity. It involves a combination of redshift-space
distortions and relativistic effects in the galaxy number-count fluctuation,
that vanishes if and only if the equivalence principle holds. We show that the
null test is very insensitive to typical uncertainties in other cosmological
parameters, including the magnification bias parameter, and to non-linear
effects, making this a robust null test for modified gravity.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.02217 [pdf] - 2028896
A null test to probe the scale-dependence of the growth of structure as
a test of General Relativity
Submitted: 2019-06-05, last modified: 2020-01-10
The main science driver for the coming generation of cosmological surveys is
understanding dark energy which relies on testing General Relativity on the
largest scales. Once we move beyond the simplest explanation for dark energy of
a cosmological constant, the space of possible theories becomes both vast and
extremely hard to compute realistic observables. A key discriminator of a
cosmological constant, however, is that the growth of structure is
scale-invariant on large scales. By carefully weighting observables derived
from distributions of galaxies and a dipole pattern in their apparent sizes, we
construct a null test which vanishes for any model of gravity or dark energy
where the growth of structure is scale-independent. It relies only on very few
assumptions about cosmology, and does not require any modelling of the growth
of structure. We show that with a survey like DESI a scale-dependence of the
order of 10-20 percent can be detected at 3 sigma with the null test, which
will drop by a factor of 2 for a survey like the Square Kilometre Array. We
also show that the null test is very insensitive to typical uncertainties in
other cosmological parameters including massive neutrinos and scale-dependent
bias, making this a key null test for dark energy.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.10178 [pdf] - 1896926
Probing redshift-space distortions with phase correlations
Submitted: 2018-05-25, last modified: 2019-06-10
Redshift-space distortions are a sensitive probe of the growth of large-scale
structure. In the linear regime, redshift-space distortions are fully described
by the multipoles of the two-point correlation function. In the nonlinear
regime, however, higher-order statistics are needed to capture the full
information of the galaxy density field. In this paper, we show that the
redshift-space line correlation function--which is a measure of Fourier phase
correlations--is sensitive to the nonlinear growth of the density and velocity
fields and to the nonlinear mapping between real and redshift space. We expand
the line correlation function in multipoles, and we show that almost all of the
information is encoded in the monopole, quadrupole, and hexadecapole. We argue
that these multipoles are highly complementary to the multipoles of the
two-point correlation function: first, because they are directly sensitive to
the difference between the density and the velocity coupling kernels, which is
a purely nonlinear quantity; and second, because the multipoles are
proportional to different combinations of $f$ and $\sigma_8$. Measured in
conjunction with the two-point correlation function and the bispectrum, the
multipoles of the line correlation function could therefore allow us to
disentangle efficiently these two quantities and to test modified theories of
gravity.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.10276 [pdf] - 1713045
Cosmological Constraints from Fourier Phase Statistics
Submitted: 2018-06-26
Most statistical inference from cosmic large-scale structure relies on
two-point statistics, i.e.\ on the galaxy-galaxy correlation function (2PCF) or
the power spectrum. These statistics capture the full information encoded in
the Fourier amplitudes of the galaxy density field but do not describe the
Fourier phases of the field. Here, we quantify the information contained in the
line correlation function (LCF), a three-point Fourier phase correlation
function. Using cosmological simulations, we estimate the Fisher information
(at redshift $z=0$) of the 2PCF, LCF and their combination, regarding the
cosmological parameters of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model, as well as a Warm
Dark Matter (WDM) model and the $f(R)$ and Symmetron modified gravity models.
The galaxy bias is accounted for at the level of a linear bias. The relative
information of the 2PCF and the LCF depends on the survey volume, sampling
density (shot noise) and the bias uncertainty. For a volume of $1h^{-3}\rm
Gpc^3$, sampled with points of mean density $\bar{n} = 2\times10^{-3} h^{3}\
\rm Mpc^{-3}$ and a bias uncertainty of 13\%, the LCF improves the parameter
constraints by about 20\% in the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology and potentially even
more in alternative models. Finally, since a linear bias only affects the
Fourier amplitudes (2PCF), but not the phases (LCF), the combination of the
2PCF and the LCF can be used to break the degeneracy between the linear bias
and $\sigma_8$, present in 2-point statistics.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.04136 [pdf] - 2039686
Prospects for CTA observations of the young SNR RX J1713.7-3946
Consortium, The CTA;
:;
Acero, F.;
Aloisio, R.;
Amans, J.;
Amato, E.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Aramo, C.;
Armstrong, T.;
Arqueros, F.;
Asano, K.;
Ashley, M.;
Backes, M.;
Balazs, C.;
Balzer, A.;
Bamba, A.;
Barkov, M.;
Barrio, J. A.;
Benbow, W.;
Bernlöhr, K.;
Beshley, V.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Bilinsky, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Biteau, J.;
Blanch, O.;
Blasi, P.;
Blazek, J.;
Boisson, C.;
Bonanno, G.;
Bonardi, A.;
Bonavolontà, C.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Braiding, C.;
Brau-Nogué, S.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brown, A. M.;
Bugaev, V.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Burton, M.;
Burtovoi, A.;
Busetto, G.;
Böttcher, M.;
Cameron, R.;
Capalbi, M.;
Caproni, A.;
Caraveo, P.;
Carosi, R.;
Cascone, E.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chaty, S.;
Chen, A.;
Chen, X.;
Chernyakova, M.;
Chikawa, M.;
Chudoba, J.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Conforti, V.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Costa, A.;
Cotter, G.;
Covino, S.;
Covone, G.;
Cumani, P.;
Cusumano, G.;
D'Ammando, F.;
D'Urso, D.;
Daniel, M.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Cesare, G.;
De Franco, A.;
De Frondat, F.;
Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal;
De Lisio, C.;
Lopez, R. de los Reyes;
De Lotto, B.;
de Naurois, M.;
De Palma, F.;
Del Santo, M.;
Delgado, C.;
della Volpe, D.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Doro, M.;
Dournaux, J.;
Dumas, D.;
Dwarkadas, V.;
Díaz, C.;
Ebr, J.;
Egberts, K.;
Einecke, S.;
Elsässer, D.;
Eschbach, S.;
Falceta-Goncalves, D.;
Fasola, G.;
Fedorova, E.;
Fernández-Barral, A.;
Ferrand, G.;
Fesquet, M.;
Fiandrini, E.;
Fiasson, A.;
Filipovíc, M. D.;
Fioretti, V.;
Font, L.;
Fontaine, G.;
Franco, F. J.;
Coromina, L. Freixas;
Fujita, Y.;
Fukui, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Förster, A.;
Gadola, A.;
López, R. Garcia;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Giuliani, A.;
Glicenstein, J.;
Gnatyk, R.;
Goldoni, P.;
Grabarczyk, T.;
Graciani, R.;
Graham, J.;
Grandi, P.;
Granot, J.;
Green, A. J.;
Griffiths, S.;
Gunji, S.;
Hakobyan, H.;
Hara, S.;
Hassan, T.;
Hayashida, M.;
Heller, M.;
Helo, J. C.;
Hinton, J.;
Hnatyk, B.;
Huet, J.;
Huetten, M.;
Humensky, T. B.;
Hussein, M.;
Hörandel, J.;
Ikeno, Y.;
Inada, T.;
Inome, Y.;
Inoue, S.;
Inoue, T.;
Inoue, Y.;
Ioka, K.;
Iori, M.;
Jacquemier, J.;
Janecek, P.;
Jankowsky, D.;
Jung, I.;
Kaaret, P.;
Katagiri, H.;
Kimeswenger, S.;
Kimura, S.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Koch, B.;
Kocot, J.;
Kohri, K.;
Komin, N.;
Konno, Y.;
Kosack, K.;
Koyama, S.;
Kraus, M.;
Kubo, H.;
Mezek, G. Kukec;
Kushida, J.;
La Palombara, N.;
Lalik, K.;
Lamanna, G.;
Landt, H.;
Lapington, J.;
Laporte, P.;
Lee, S.;
Lees, J.;
Lefaucheur, J.;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Leto, G.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lohse, T.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
Lopez, M.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Luque-Escamilla, P. L.;
López-Coto, R.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Maier, G.;
Malaguti, G.;
Mandat, D.;
Maneva, G.;
Mangano, S.;
Marcowith, A.;
Martí, J.;
Martínez, M.;
Martínez, G.;
Masuda, S.;
Maurin, G.;
Maxted, N.;
Melioli, C.;
Mineo, T.;
Mirabal, N.;
Mizuno, T.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohammed, M.;
Montaruli, T.;
Moralejo, A.;
Mori, K.;
Morlino, G.;
Morselli, A.;
Moulin, E.;
Mukherjee, R.;
Mundell, C.;
Muraishi, H.;
Murase, K.;
Nagataki, S.;
Nagayoshi, T.;
Naito, T.;
Nakajima, D.;
Nakamori, T.;
Nemmen, R.;
Niemiec, J.;
Nieto, D.;
Nievas-Rosillo, M.;
Nikołajuk, M.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogues, L.;
Nosek, D.;
Novosyadlyj, B.;
Nozaki, S.;
Ohira, Y.;
Ohishi, M.;
Ohm, S.;
Okumura, A.;
Ong, R. A.;
Orito, R.;
Orlati, A.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Oya, I.;
Padovani, M.;
Palacio, J.;
Palatka, M.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Pavy, S.;
Pe'er, A.;
Persic, M.;
Petrucci, P.;
Petruk, O.;
Pisarski, A.;
Pohl, M.;
Porcelli, A.;
Prandini, E.;
Prast, J.;
Principe, G.;
Prouza, M.;
Pueschel, E.;
Pühlhofer, G.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Rameez, M.;
Reimer, O.;
Renaud, M.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Rizi, V.;
Rodriguez, J.;
Fernandez, G. Rodriguez;
Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez;
Romano, P.;
Romeo, G.;
Rosado, J.;
Rousselle, J.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Sadeh, I.;
Safi-Harb, S.;
Saito, T.;
Sakaki, N.;
Sanchez, D.;
Sangiorgi, P.;
Sano, H.;
Santander, M.;
Sarkar, S.;
Sawada, M.;
Schioppa, E. J.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Schovanek, P.;
Schussler, F.;
Sergijenko, O.;
Servillat, M.;
Shalchi, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Siejkowski, H.;
Sillanpää, A.;
Simone, D.;
Sliusar, V.;
Sol, H.;
Stanič, S.;
Starling, R.;
Stawarz, Ł.;
Stefanik, S.;
Stephan, M.;
Stolarczyk, T.;
Szanecki, M.;
Szepieniec, T.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tajima, H.;
Takahashi, M.;
Takeda, J.;
Tanaka, M.;
Tanaka, S.;
Tejedor, L. A.;
Telezhinsky, I.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terada, Y.;
Tescaro, D.;
Teshima, M.;
Testa, V.;
Thoudam, S.;
Tokanai, F.;
Torres, D. F.;
Torresi, E.;
Tosti, G.;
Townsley, C.;
Travnicek, P.;
Trichard, C.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Tsujimoto, S.;
Vagelli, V.;
Vallania, P.;
Valore, L.;
van Driel, W.;
van Eldik, C.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Vassiliev, V.;
Vecchi, M.;
Vercellone, S.;
Vergani, S.;
Vigorito, C.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Vrastil, M.;
Acosta, M. L. Vázquez;
Wagner, S. J.;
Wagner, R.;
Wakely, S. P.;
Walter, R.;
Ward, J. E.;
Watson, J. J.;
Weinstein, A.;
White, M.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Wilcox, P.;
Williams, D. A.;
Wischnewski, R.;
Wojcik, P.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yamazaki, R.;
Yanagita, S.;
Yang, L.;
Yoshida, T.;
Yoshida, M.;
Yoshiike, S.;
Yoshikoshi, T.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zampieri, L.;
Zanin, R.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zdziarski, A.;
Zech, A.;
Zechlin, H.;
Zhdanov, V.;
Ziegler, A.;
Zorn, J.
Submitted: 2017-04-13
We perform simulations for future Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA)
observations of RX~J1713.7$-$3946, a young supernova remnant (SNR) and one of
the brightest sources ever discovered in very-high-energy (VHE) gamma rays.
Special attention is paid to explore possible spatial (anti-)correlations of
gamma rays with emission at other wavelengths, in particular X-rays and
CO/H{\sc i} emission. We present a series of simulated images of RX
J1713.7$-$3946 for CTA based on a set of observationally motivated models for
the gamma-ray emission. In these models, VHE gamma rays produced by high-energy
electrons are assumed to trace the non-thermal X-ray emission observed by {\it
XMM-Newton}, whereas those originating from relativistic protons delineate the
local gas distributions. The local atomic and molecular gas distributions are
deduced by the NANTEN team from CO and H{\sc i} observations. Our primary goal
is to show how one can distinguish the emission mechanism(s) of the gamma rays
(i.e., hadronic vs leptonic, or a mixture of the two) through information
provided by their spatial distribution, spectra, and time variation. This work
is the first attempt to quantitatively evaluate the capabilities of CTA to
achieve various proposed scientific goals by observing this important cosmic
particle accelerator.
