Normalized to: France, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.1940 [pdf] - 288646
An Optical Readout TPC (O-TPC) for Studies in Nuclear Astrophysics With
Gamma-Ray Beams at HIgS
Gai, M.;
Ahmed, M. W.;
Stave, S. C.;
Zimmerman, W. R.;
Breskin, A.;
Bromberger, B.;
Chechik, R.;
Dangendorf, V.;
Delbar, Th.;
France, R. H.;
Henshaw, S. S.;
Kading, T. J.;
Martel, P. P.;
McDonald, J. E. R.;
Seo, P. -N.;
Tittelmeier, K.;
Weller, H. R.;
Young, A. H.
Submitted: 2011-01-10
We report on the construction, tests, calibrations and commissioning of an
Optical Readout Time Projection Chamber (O-TPC) detector operating with a
CO2(80%) + N2(20%) gas mixture at 100 and 150 Torr. It was designed to measure
the cross sections of several key nuclear reactions involved in stellar
evolution. In particular, a study of the rate of formation of oxygen and carbon
during the process of helium burning will be performed by exposing the chamber
gas to intense nearly mono-energetic gamma-ray beams at the High Intensity
Gamma Source (HIgS) facility. The O-TPC has a sensitive target-drift volume of
30x30x21 cm^3. Ionization electrons drift towards a double parallel grid
avalanche multiplier, yielding charge multiplication and light emission.
Avalanche induced photons from N2 emission are collected, intensified and
recorded with a Charge Coupled Device (CCD) camera, providing two-dimensional
track images. The event's time projection (third coordinate) and the deposited
energy are recorded by photomultipliers and by the TPC charge-signal,
respectively. A dedicated VME-based data acquisition system and associated data
analysis tools were developed to record and analyze these data. The O-TPC has
been tested and calibrated with 3.183 MeV alpha-particles emitted by a 148Gd
source placed within its volume with a measured energy resolution of 3.0%.
Tracks of alpha and 12C particles from the dissociation of 16O and of three
alpha-particles from the dissociation of 12C have been measured during initial
in-beam test experiments performed at the HIgS facility at Duke University. The
full detection system and its performance are described and the results of the
preliminary in-beam test experiments are reported.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0702018 [pdf] - 118493
A Further Measurement of the beta-Delayed alpha-Particle Emission of 16N
Submitted: 2007-02-08
We measured the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission spectrum of 16N with a
sensitivity for beta-decay branching ratios of the order of 10-10. The 16N
nuclei were produced using the d(15N,16N)p reaction with 70 MeV 15N beams and a
deuterium gas target 7.5 cm long at a pressure of 1250 torr. The 16N nuclei
were collected (over 10 s) using a thin aluminum foil with an areal density of
180 mu g/cm2 tilted at 7 Deg with respect to the beam. The activity was
transferred to the counting area by means of a stepping motor in less than 3 s
with the counting carried out over 8 s. The beta-delayed alpha-particles were
measured using a time of flight method to achieve a sufficiently low
background. Standard calibration sources (148Gd, 241Am, 208,209Po, and 227Ac)
as well as alpha-particles and 7Li from the 10B(n,alpha)7Li reaction were used
for an accurate energy calibration. The energy resolution of the catcher foil
(180-220 keV) was calculated and the time of flight resolution (3-10 nsec) was
measured using the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission from 8Li that was
produced using the d(7Li,8Li)p reaction with the same setup. The line shape was
corrected to account for the variation in the energy and time resolution and a
high statistics spectrum of the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of 16N is
reported. However, our data (as well as earlier Mainz data and unpublished
Seattle data) do not agree with an earlier measurement of the beta-delayed
alpha-particle emission of 16N taken at TRIUMF after averaging over the energy
resolution of our collection system. This disagreement, amongst other issues,
prohibits accurate inclusion of the f-wave component in the R-matrix analysis.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0608027 [pdf] - 118485
In Beam Tests of Implanted Helium Targets
McDonald, J. E.;
France, R. H.;
Jarvis, R. A.;
Ahmed, M. W.;
Blackston, M. A.;
Delbar, Th.;
Gai, M.;
Kading, T. J.;
Parpottas, Y.;
Perdue, B. A.;
Prior, R. M.;
Rubin, D. A.;
Spraker, M. C.;
Yeomans, J. D.;
Weissman, L.;
Weller, H. R.;
Wilds, E. L.;
;
;
UHartford;
GCSU;
LNS/UConn;
TUNL/Duke;
UCL/LLN;
Yale;
NGCSU
Submitted: 2006-08-16
Targets consisting of 3,4He implanted into thin aluminum foils (approximately
100, 200 or 600 ug/cm^2) were prepared using intense (a few uA) helium beams at
low energy (approximately 20, 40 or 100 keV). Uniformity of the implantation
was achieved by a beam raster across a 12 mm diameter tantalum collimator at
the rates of 0.1 Hz in the vertical direction and 1 Hz in the horizontal
direction. Helium implantation into the very thin (approximately 80-100
ug/cm^2) aluminum foils failed to produce useful targets (with only
approximately 10% of the helium retained) due to an under estimation of the
range by the code SRIM. The range of low energy helium in aluminum predicted by
Northcliffe and Shilling and the NIST online tabulation are observed on the
other hand to over estimate the range of low energy helium ions in aluminum. An
attempt to increase the amount of helium by implanting a second deeper layer
was also carried out, but it did not significantly increase the helium content
beyond the blistering limit (approximately 6 x 10^17 helium/cm^2). The
implanted targets were bombarded with moderately intense 4He and 16O beams of
50-100 particle nA . Rutherford Back Scattering of 1.0 and 2.5 MeV proton beams
and recoil helium from 15.0 MeV oxygen beams were used to study the helium
content and profile before, during and after bombardments. We observed the
helium content and profile to be very stable even after a prolonged bombardment
(up to two days) with moderately intense beams of 16O or 4He. Helium implanted
into thin (aluminum) foils is a good choice for thin helium targets needed, for
example, for a measurement of the 3he(a,g)7Be reaction and the associated S34
astrophysical cross section factor (S-factor).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0307129 [pdf] - 57842
Absolute Branching Ratio of Beta-Delayed Gamma-Ray Emission of N18
Submitted: 2003-07-07, last modified: 2003-07-09
The absolute branching ratio of the beta-delayed gamma-ray emission of N18
was measured, providing absolute normalization of the previous work by Olness
et al. [J.W. Olness et al., Nuc. Phys. A373, 13 (1982)] who measured the
relative branching ratios for the individual gamma-rays. We find the total
absolute branching ratio for beta-delayed gamma emission of N18 to be 76.7 +/-
7.2(stat) +/- 5.8(norm)%. A combination of other results suggests a value
consistent with our result, but smaller than that calculated by Millener as
quoted in Olness et al.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9809228 [pdf] - 102932
How Well Do We Know the Beta-Decay of N16 and Oxygen Formation in Helium
Burning?
Submitted: 1998-09-17
Contrary to claims that the problem has been solved, the astrophysical E1
S-factor of \c12ag is not yet well known. R-Matrix analyses of elastic
scattering data,\c12ag data, and data on the beta-delayed alpha-particle
emission of N16 are not consistent and a small S-factor solution SE1(300)
cannot be ruled out. In particular, data on the beta- delayed alpha-particle
emission of N16 do not agree. The unaltered Mainz data do not agree with
TRIUMF, but agree with both Seattle and Yale-UConn. The TRIUMF col- laboration
has recalibratedthe Mainz('71) data; however, we dispute both the alteration of
the Mainz data performed by the TRIUMF col- laboration and the very
justification for the recalibration.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/9707008 [pdf] - 118500
Comment on Constraints on the Low-Energy E1 Cross Section of
12C(alpha,gamma)16O from the Beta-Delayed Alpha Spectrum of 16N
Submitted: 1997-07-31, last modified: 1997-09-11
We dispute the alteration by Azuma et al. of the energy calibration of the
Mainz('71) data on the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of $^{16}N$ as well
as the very justification of the recalibration. We use the unaltered data to
observe a pronounced disagreement between the TRIUMF('94) and Mainz('71) data
sets on both the high and low energy sides of the primary peak (at 2.36 MeV) of
the $^{16}N$ alpha-spectrum. We cannot support the dismissal of the Mainz('71)
spectrum by the TRIUMF collaboration and emphasize the need to include it in
R-matrix fits. We discuss the need for new improved data to resolve this
disagreement and its implication for the extracted p-wave astrophysical
S-factor of the $^{12}C(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}O$ reaction.