Normalized to: Folkner, W.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.01017 [pdf] - 2074548
Initial results from the New Horizons exploration of 2014 MU69, a small
Kuiper Belt Object
Stern, S. A.;
Weaver, H. A.;
Spencer, J. R.;
Olkin, C. B.;
Gladstone, G. R.;
Grundy, W. M.;
Moore, J. M.;
Cruikshank, D. P.;
Elliott, H. A.;
McKinnon, W. B.;
Parker, J. Wm.;
Verbiscer, A. J.;
Young, L. A.;
Aguilar, D. A.;
Albers, J. M.;
Andert, T.;
Andrews, J. P.;
Bagenal, F.;
Banks, M. E.;
Bauer, B. A.;
Bauman, J. A.;
Bechtold, K. E.;
Beddingfield, C. B.;
Behrooz, N.;
Beisser, K. B.;
Benecchi, S. D.;
Bernardoni, E.;
Beyer, R. A.;
Bhaskaran, S.;
Bierson, C. J.;
Binzel, R. P.;
Birath, E. M.;
Bird, M. K.;
Boone, D. R.;
Bowman, A. F.;
Bray, V. J.;
Britt, D. T.;
Brown, L. E.;
Buckley, M. R.;
Buie, M. W.;
Buratti, B. J.;
Burke, L. M.;
Bushman, S. S.;
Carcich, B.;
Chaikin, A. L.;
Chavez, C. L.;
Cheng, A. F.;
Colwell, E. J.;
Conard, S. J.;
Conner, M. P.;
Conrad, C. A.;
Cook, J. C.;
Cooper, S. B.;
Custodio, O. S.;
Ore, C. M. Dalle;
Deboy, C. C.;
Dharmavaram, P.;
Dhingra, R. D.;
Dunn, G. F.;
Earle, A. M.;
Egan, A. F.;
Eisig, J.;
El-Maarry, M. R.;
Engelbrecht, C.;
Enke, B. L.;
Ercol, C. J.;
Fattig, E. D.;
Ferrell, C. L.;
Finley, T. J.;
Firer, J.;
Fischetti, J.;
Folkner, W. M.;
Fosbury, M. N.;
Fountain, G. H.;
Freeze, J. M.;
Gabasova, L.;
Glaze, L. S.;
Green, J. L.;
Griffith, G. A.;
Guo, Y.;
Hahn, M.;
Hals, D. W.;
Hamilton, D. P.;
Hamilton, S. A.;
Hanley, J. J.;
Harch, A.;
Harmon, K. A.;
Hart, H. M.;
Hayes, J.;
Hersman, C. B.;
Hill, M. E.;
Hill, T. A.;
Hofgartner, J. D.;
Holdridge, M. E.;
Horányi, M.;
Hosadurga, A.;
Howard, A. D.;
Howett, C. J. A.;
Jaskulek, S. E.;
Jennings, D. E.;
Jensen, J. R.;
Jones, M. R.;
Kang, H. K.;
Katz, D. J.;
Kaufmann, D. E.;
Kavelaars, J. J.;
Keane, J. T.;
Keleher, G. P.;
Kinczyk, M.;
Kochte, M. C.;
Kollmann, P.;
Krimigis, S. M.;
Kruizinga, G. L.;
Kusnierkiewicz, D. Y.;
Lahr, M. S.;
Lauer, T. R.;
Lawrence, G. B.;
Lee, J. E.;
Lessac-Chenen, E. J.;
Linscott, I. R.;
Lisse, C. M.;
Lunsford, A. W.;
Mages, D. M.;
Mallder, V. A.;
Martin, N. P.;
May, B. H.;
McComas, D. J.;
McNutt, R. L.;
Mehoke, Jr. D. S.;
Mehoke, T. S.;
Nelson, D. S.;
Nguyen, H. D.;
Núñez, J. I.;
Ocampo, A. C.;
Owen, W. M.;
Oxton, G. K.;
Parker, A. H.;
Pätzold, M.;
Pelgrift, J. Y.;
Pelletier, F. J.;
Pineau, J. P.;
Piquette, M. R.;
Porter, S. B.;
Protopapa, S.;
Quirico, E.;
Redfern, J. A.;
Regiec, A. L.;
Reitsema, H. J.;
Reuter, D. C.;
Richardson, D. C.;
Riedel, J. E.;
Ritterbush, M. A.;
Robbins, S. J.;
Rodgers, D. J.;
Rogers, G. D.;
Rose, D. M.;
Rosendall, P. E.;
Runyon, K. D.;
Ryschkewitsch, M. G.;
Saina, M. M.;
Salinas, M. J.;
Schenk, P. M.;
Scherrer, J. R.;
Schlei, W. R.;
Schmitt, B.;
Schultz, D. J.;
Schurr, D. C.;
Scipioni, F.;
Sepan, R. L.;
Shelton, R. G.;
Showalter, M. R.;
Simon, M.;
Singer, K. N.;
Stahlheber, E. W.;
Stanbridge, D. R.;
Stansberry, J. A.;
Steffl, A. J.;
Strobel, D. F.;
Stothoff, M. M.;
Stryk, T.;
Stuart, J. R.;
Summers, M. E.;
Tapley, M. B.;
Taylor, A.;
Taylor, H. W.;
Tedford, R. M.;
Throop, H. B.;
Turner, L. S.;
Umurhan, O. M.;
Van Eck, J.;
Velez, D.;
Versteeg, M. H.;
Vincent, M. A.;
Webbert, R. W.;
Weidner, S. E.;
Weigle, G. E.;
Wendel, J. R.;
White, O. L.;
Whittenburg, K. E.;
Williams, B. G.;
Williams, K. E.;
Williams, S. P.;
Winters, H. L.;
Zangari, A. M.;
Zurbuchen, T. H.
Submitted: 2020-04-02
The Kuiper Belt is a distant region of the Solar System. On 1 January 2019,
the New Horizons spacecraft flew close to (486958) 2014 MU69, a Cold Classical
Kuiper Belt Object, a class of objects that have never been heated by the Sun
and are therefore well preserved since their formation. Here we describe
initial results from these encounter observations. MU69 is a bi-lobed contact
binary with a flattened shape, discrete geological units, and noticeable albedo
heterogeneity. However, there is little surface color and compositional
heterogeneity. No evidence for satellites, ring or dust structures, gas coma,
or solar wind interactions was detected. By origin MU69 appears consistent with
pebble cloud collapse followed by a low velocity merger of its two lobes.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.03695 [pdf] - 2061654
Equilibrium Tidal Response of Jupiter: Detectability by Juno
Submitted: 2020-01-10
An observation of Jupiter's tidal response is anticipated for the on-going
Juno spacecraft mission. We combine self-consistent, numerical models of
Jupiter's equilibrium tidal response with observed Doppler shifts from the Juno
gravity science experiment to test the sensitivity of the spacecraft to tides
raised by the Galilean satellites and the Sun. The concentric Maclaurin
spheroid (CMS) method finds the equilibrium shape and gravity field of a
rotating, liquid planet with the tide raised by a satellite, expanded in Love
numbers ($k_{nm}$). We present improvements to CMS theory that eliminate an
unphysical center of mass offset and study in detail the convergence behavior
of the CMS approach. We demonstrate that the dependence of $k_{nm}$ with
orbital distance is important when considering the combined tidal response for
Jupiter. Conversely, the details of the interior structure have a negligible
influence on $k_{nm}$, for models that match the zonal harmonics $J_2$, $J_4$
and $J_6$, already measured to high precision by Juno. As the mission
continues, improved coverage of Jupiter's gravity field at different phases of
Io's orbit is expected to yield an observed value for the degree-2 Love number
($k_{22}$) and potentially select higher--degree $k_{nm}$. We present a test of
the sensitivity of the Juno Doppler signal to the calculated $k_{nm}$, which
suggests the detectability of $k_{33}$, $k_{42}$ and $k_{31}$, in addition to
$k_{22}$. A mismatch of a robust Juno observation with the remarkably small
range in calculated Io equilibrium $k_{22}=0.58976\pm0.0001$, would indicate a
heretofore uncharacterized dynamic contribution to the tides.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.00595 [pdf] - 2085100
Modeling the uncertainties of solar-system ephemerides for robust
gravitational-wave searches with pulsar timing arrays
Vallisneri, M.;
Taylor, S. R.;
Simon, J.;
Folkner, W. M.;
Park, R. S.;
Cutler, C.;
Ellis, J. A.;
Lazio, T. J. W.;
Vigeland, S. J.;
Aggarwal, K.;
Arzoumanian, Z.;
Baker, P. T.;
Brazier, A.;
Brook, P. R.;
Burke-Spolaor, S.;
Chatterjee, S.;
Cordes, J. M.;
Cornish, N. J.;
Crawford, F.;
Cromartie, H. T.;
Crowter, K.;
DeCesar, M.;
Demorest, P. B.;
Dolch, T.;
Ferdman, R. D.;
Ferrara, E. C.;
Fonseca, E.;
Garver-Daniels, N.;
Gentile, P.;
Good, D.;
Hazboun, J. S.;
Holgado, A. M.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Islo, K.;
Jennings, R.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, M. L.;
Kaplan, D. L.;
Kelley, L. Z.;
Key, J. S.;
Lam, M. T.;
Levin, L.;
Lorimer, D. R.;
Luo, J.;
Lynch, R. S.;
Madison, D. R.;
McLaughlin, M. A.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Ng, C.;
Nice, D. J.;
Pennucci, T. T.;
Pol, N. S.;
Ransom, S. M.;
Ray, P. S.;
Siemens, X.;
Spiewak, R.;
Stairs, I. H.;
Stinebring, D. R.;
Stovall, K.;
Swiggum, J. K.;
van Haasteren, R.;
Witt, C. A.;
Zhu, W. W.
Submitted: 2020-01-02, last modified: 2020-01-06
The regularity of pulsar emissions becomes apparent once we reference the
pulses' times of arrivals to the inertial rest frame of the solar system. It
follows that errors in the determination of Earth's position with respect to
the solar-system barycenter can appear as a time-correlated bias in
pulsar-timing residual time series, affecting the searches for low-frequency
gravitational waves performed with pulsar timing arrays. Indeed, recent array
datasets yield different gravitational-wave background upper limits and
detection statistics when analyzed with different solar-system ephemerides.
Crucially, the ephemerides do not generally provide usable error
representations. In this article we describe the motivation, construction, and
application of a physical model of solar-system ephemeris uncertainties, which
focuses on the degrees of freedom (Jupiter's orbital elements) most relevant to
gravitational-wave searches with pulsar timing arrays. This model, BayesEphem,
was used to derive ephemeris-robust results in NANOGrav's 11-yr
stochastic-background search, and it provides a foundation for future searches
by NANOGrav and other consortia. The analysis and simulations reported here
suggest that ephemeris modeling reduces the gravitational-wave sensitivity of
the 11-yr dataset; and that this degeneracy will vanish with improved
ephemerides and with the longer pulsar timing datasets that will become
available in the near future.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.03899 [pdf] - 2030555
The radioscience LaRa instrument onboard ExoMars 2020 to investigate the
rotation and interior of Mars
Dehant, Veronique;
Maistre, Sebastien Le;
Baland, Rose-Marie;
Bergeot, Nicolas;
Karatekin, Ozgur;
Peters, Marie-Julie;
Rivoldini, Attilio;
Lozano, Luca Ruiz;
Temel, Orkun;
Van Hoolst, Tim;
Yseboodt, Marie;
Mitrovic, Michel;
Kosov, Alexander;
Valenta, Vaclav;
Thomassen, Lieven;
Karki, Sumit;
Khalifeh, Khaldoun Al;
Craeye, Christophe;
Gurvits, Leonid;
Marty, Jean-Charles;
Asmar, Sami;
Folkner, William;
Team, the LaRa
Submitted: 2019-10-09, last modified: 2019-10-10
LaRa (Lander Radioscience) is an experiment on the ExoMars 2020 mission that
uses the Doppler shift on the radio link due to the motion of the ExoMars
platform tied to the surface of Mars with respect to the Earth ground stations
(e.g. the deep space network stations of NASA), in order to precisely measure
the relative velocity of the lander on Mars with respect to the Earth. The LaRa
measurements shall improve the understanding of the structure and processes in
the deep interior of Mars by obtaining the rotation and orientation of Mars
with a better precision compared to the previous missions. In this paper, we
provide the analysis done until now for the best realization of these
objectives. We explain the geophysical observation that will be reached with
LaRa (Length-of-day variations, precession, nutation, and possibly polar
motion). We develop the experiment set up, which includes the ground stations
on Earth (so-called ground segment). We describe the instrument, i.e. the
transponder and its three antennas. We further detail the link budget and the
expected noise level that will be reached. Finally, we detail the expected
results, which encompasses the explanation of how we shall determine Mars'
orientation parameters, and the way we shall deduce Mars' interior structure
and Mars' atmosphere from them. Lastly, we explain briefly how we will be able
to determine the Surface platform position.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.00104 [pdf] - 1920124
On orbit performance of the GRACE Follow-On Laser Ranging Interferometer
Abich, Klaus;
Braxmaier, Claus;
Gohlke, Martin;
Sanjuan, Josep;
Abramovici, Alexander;
Okihiro, Brian Bachman;
Barr, David C.;
Bize, Maxime P.;
Burke, Michael J.;
Clark, Ken C.;
de Vine, Glenn;
Dickson, Jeffrey A.;
Dubovitsky, Serge;
Folkner, William M.;
Francis, Samuel;
Gilbert, Martin S.;
Katsumura, Mark;
Klipstein, William;
Larsen, Kameron;
Liebe, Carl Christian;
Liu, Jehhal;
McKenzie, Kirk;
Morton, Phillip R.;
Murray, Alexander T.;
Nguyen, Don J.;
Ravich, Joshua A.;
Shaddock, Daniel;
Spero, Robert;
Spiers, Gary;
Sutton, Andrew;
Trinh, Joseph;
Wang, Duo;
Wang, Rabi T.;
Ware, Brent;
Woodruff, Christopher;
Amparan, Bengie;
Davis, Mike A.;
Howell, James;
Kruger, Micah;
Lobmeyer, Lynette;
Pierce, Robert;
Reavis, Gretchen;
Sileo, Michael;
Stephens, Michelle;
Baatzsch, Andreas;
Dahl, Christian;
Dahl, Katrin;
Gilles, Frank;
Hager, Philipp;
Herding, Mark;
Kaufer, Marina;
Nicklaus, Kolja;
Voss, Kai;
Bogan, Christina;
Danzmann, Karsten;
Barranco, Germán Fernández;
Heinzel, Gerhard;
Koch, Alexander;
Mahrdt, Christoph;
Misfeldt, Malte;
Müller, Vitali;
Reiche, Jens;
Schütze, Daniel;
Sheard, Benjamin;
Stede, Gunnar;
Wegener, Henry;
Eckardt, Andreas;
Guenther, Burghardt;
Mangoldt, Thomas;
Zender, Bernd;
Ester, Thomas;
Heine, Frank;
Seiter, Christoph;
Windisch, Steve;
Flatscher, Reinhold;
Flechtner, Frank;
Grossard, Nicolas;
Hauden, Jerome;
Hinz, Martin;
Leikert, Thomas;
Zimmermann, Marcus;
Lebeda, Anton;
Lebeda, Arnold
Submitted: 2019-06-28
The Laser Ranging Interferometer (LRI) instrument on the Gravity Recovery and
Climate Experiment (GRACE) Follow-On mission has provided the first laser
interferometric range measurements between remote spacecraft, separated by
approximately 220 km. Autonomous controls that lock the laser frequency to a
cavity reference and establish the 5 degree of freedom two-way laser link
between remote spacecraft succeeded on the first attempt. Active beam pointing
based on differential wavefront sensing compensates spacecraft attitude
fluctuations. The LRI has operated continuously without breaks in phase
tracking for more than 50 days, and has shown biased range measurements similar
to the primary ranging instrument based on microwaves, but with much less noise
at a level of $1\,{\rm nm}/\sqrt{\rm Hz}$ at Fourier frequencies above 100 mHz.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.02617 [pdf] - 1696252
The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints On The
Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background
Arzoumanian, Z.;
Baker, P. T.;
Brazier, A.;
Burke-Spolaor, S.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chatterjee, S.;
Christy, B.;
Cordes, J. M.;
Cornish, N. J.;
Crawford, F.;
Cromartie, H. Thankful;
Crowter, K.;
DeCesar, M.;
Demorest, P. B.;
Dolch, T.;
Ellis, J. A.;
Ferdman, R. D.;
Ferrara, E.;
Folkner, W. M.;
Fonseca, E.;
Garver-Daniels, N.;
Gentile, P. A.;
Haas, R.;
Hazboun, J. S.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Islo, K.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, M. L.;
Kaplan, D. L.;
Kaspi, V. M.;
Lam, M. T.;
Lazio, T. J. W.;
Levin, L.;
Lommen, A. N.;
Lorimer, D. R.;
Luo, J.;
Lynch, R. S.;
Madison, D. R.;
McLaughlin, M. A.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Ng, C.;
Nice, D. J.;
Park, R. S.;
Pennucci, T. T.;
Pol, N. S.;
Ransom, S. M.;
Ray, P. S.;
Rasskazov, A.;
Siemens, X.;
Simon, J.;
Spiewak, R.;
Stairs, I. H.;
Stinebring, D. R.;
Stovall, K.;
Swiggum, J.;
Taylor, S. R.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Vigeland, S.;
Zhu, W. W.
Submitted: 2018-01-08, last modified: 2018-06-07
We search for an isotropic stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) in
the newly released $11$-year dataset from the North American Nanohertz
Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav). While we find no significant
evidence for a GWB, we place constraints on a GWB from a population of
supermassive black-hole binaries, cosmic strings, and a primordial GWB. For the
first time, we find that the GWB upper limits and detection statistics are
sensitive to the Solar System ephemeris (SSE) model used, and that SSE errors
can mimic a GWB signal. We developed an approach that bridges systematic SSE
differences, producing the first PTA constraints that are robust against SSE
uncertainties. We thus place a $95\%$ upper limit on the GW strain amplitude of
$A_\mathrm{GWB}<1.45\times 10^{-15}$ at a frequency of $f=1$ yr$^{-1}$ for a
fiducial $f^{-2/3}$ power-law spectrum, and with inter-pulsar correlations
modeled. This is a factor of $\sim 2$ improvement over the NANOGrav $9$-year
limit, calculated using the same procedure. Previous PTA upper limits on the
GWB will need revision in light of SSE systematic uncertainties. We use our
constraints to characterize the combined influence on the GWB of the stellar
mass-density in galactic cores, the eccentricity of SMBH binaries, and
SMBH--galactic-bulge scaling relationships. We constrain cosmic-string tension
using recent simulations, yielding an SSE-marginalized $95\%$ upper limit on
the cosmic string tension of $G\mu < 5.3\times 10^{-11}$---a factor of $\sim 2$
better than the published NANOGrav $9$-year constraints. Our SSE-marginalized
$95\%$ upper limit on the energy density of a primordial GWB (for a
radiation-dominated post-inflation Universe) is
$\Omega_\mathrm{GWB}(f)h^2<3.4\times10^{-10}$.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.02898 [pdf] - 1736281
Solar System Ephemerides, Pulsar Timing, Gravitational Waves, and
Navigation
Submitted: 2018-01-09
In-spiraling supermassive black holes should emit gravitational waves, which
would produce characteristic distortions in the time of arrival residuals from
millisecond pulsars. Multiple national and regional consortia have constructed
pulsar timing arrays by precise timing of different sets of millisecond
pulsars. An essential aspect of precision timing is the transfer of the times
of arrival to a (quasi-)inertial frame, conventionally the solar system
barycenter. The barycenter is determined from the knowledge of the planetary
masses and orbits, which has been refined over the past 50 years by multiple
spacecraft. Within the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational
Waves (NANOGrav), uncertainties on the solar system barycenter are emerging as
an important element of the NANOGrav noise budget. We describe what is known
about the solar system barycenter, touch upon how uncertainties in it affect
gravitational wave studies with pulsar timing arrays, and consider future
trends in spacecraft navigation.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.01546 [pdf] - 1306246
Historical Reflections on the Work of IAU Commission 4 (Ephemerides)
Kaplan, George H.;
Bangert, John A.;
Fienga, Agnes;
Folkner, William;
Hohenkerk, Catherine;
Lukashova, Marina;
Pitjeva, Elena V.;
Seidelmann, P. Kenneth;
Sveshnikov, Michael;
Urban, Sean;
Vondrak, Jan;
Weratschnig, Julia;
Williams, James G.
Submitted: 2015-11-04
As part of a reorganization of the International Astronomical Union (IAU),
Commission 4 (Ephemerides) went out of existence after the IAU General Assembly
in August 2015. This paper presents brief discussions of some of the
developments in fundamental astronomy that have influenced and been influenced
by the work of Commission 4 over its 96-year history. The paper also presents
notes about some of the publications of the national institutions that have
played an essential role in the commission's mission. The contents of this
paper were submitted for Commission 4's final report, to appear in IAU
Transactions Vol. XXIX-A.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.06262 [pdf] - 1300416
IAU 2015 Resolution B2 on Recommended Zero Points for the Absolute and
Apparent Bolometric Magnitude Scales
Mamajek, E. E.;
Torres, G.;
Prsa, A.;
Harmanec, P.;
Asplund, M.;
Bennett, P. D.;
Capitaine, N.;
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J.;
Depagne, E.;
Folkner, W. M.;
Haberreiter, M.;
Hekker, S.;
Hilton, J. L.;
Kostov, V.;
Kurtz, D. W.;
Laskar, J.;
Mason, B. D.;
Milone, E. F.;
Montgomery, M. M.;
Richards, M. T.;
Schou, J.;
Stewart, S. G.
Submitted: 2015-10-21, last modified: 2015-10-26
The XXIXth IAU General Assembly in Honolulu adopted IAU 2015 Resolution B2 on
recommended zero points for the absolute and apparent bolometric magnitude
scales. The resolution was proposed by the IAU Inter-Division A-G Working Group
on Nominal Units for Stellar and Planetary Astronomy after consulting with a
broad spectrum of researchers from the astronomical community. Resolution B2
resolves the long-standing absence of an internationally-adopted zero point for
the absolute and apparent bolometric magnitude scales. Resolution B2 defines
the zero point of the absolute bolometric magnitude scale such that a radiation
source with $M_{\rm Bol}$ = 0 has luminosity L$_{\circ}$ = 3.0128e28 W. The
zero point of the apparent bolometric magnitude scale ($m_{\rm Bol}$ = 0)
corresponds to irradiance $f_{\circ}$ = 2.518021002e-8 W/m$^2$. The zero points
were chosen so that the nominal solar luminosity (3.828e26 W) adopted by IAU
2015 Resolution B3 corresponds approximately to $M_{\rm Bol}$(Sun) = 4.74, the
value most commonly adopted in recent literature. The nominal total solar
irradiance (1361 W/m$^2$) adopted in IAU 2015 Resolution B3 corresponds
approximately to apparent bolometric magnitude $m_{\rm bol}$(Sun) = -26.832.
Implicit in the IAU 2015 Resolution B2 definition of the apparent bolometric
magnitude scale is an exact definition for the parsec (648000/$\pi$ au) based
on the IAU 2012 Resolution B2 definition of the astronomical unit.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07674 [pdf] - 1300455
IAU 2015 Resolution B3 on Recommended Nominal Conversion Constants for
Selected Solar and Planetary Properties
Mamajek, E. E.;
Prsa, A.;
Torres, G.;
Harmanec, P.;
Asplund, M.;
Bennett, P. D.;
Capitaine, N.;
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J.;
Depagne, E.;
Folkner, W. M.;
Haberreiter, M.;
Hekker, S.;
Hilton, J. L.;
Kostov, V.;
Kurtz, D. W.;
Laskar, J.;
Mason, B. D.;
Milone, E. F.;
Montgomery, M. M.;
Richards, M. T.;
Schou, J.;
Stewart, S. G.
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Astronomers commonly quote the properties of celestial objects in units of
parameters for the Sun, Jupiter, or the Earth. The resolution presented here
was proposed by the IAU Inter-Division Working Group on Nominal Units for
Stellar and Planetary Astronomy and passed by the XXIXth IAU General Assembly
in Honolulu. IAU 2015 Resolution B3 adopts a set of nominal solar, terrestrial,
and jovian conversion constants for stellar and (exo)planetary astronomy which
are defined to be exact SI values. While the nominal constants are based on
current best estimates (CBEs; which have uncertainties, are not secularly
constant, and are updated regularly using new observations), they should be
interpreted as standard values and not as CBEs. IAU 2015 Resolution B3 adopts
five solar conversion constants (nominal solar radius, nominal total solar
irradiance, nominal solar luminosity, nominal solar effective temperature, and
nominal solar mass parameter) and six planetary conversion constants (nominal
terrestrial equatorial radius, nominal terrestrial polar radius, nominal jovian
equatorial radius, nominal jovian polar radius, nominal terrestrial mass
parameter, and nominal jovian mass parameter).
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.04291 [pdf] - 1247182
Report of the IAU Commission 4 Working Group on Standardizing Access to
Ephemerides and File Format Specification
Hilton, James L.;
Acton, Charles;
Arlot, Jean-Eudes;
Bell, Steven A.;
Capitaine, Nicole;
Fienga, Agnes;
Folkner, William M.;
Gastineau, Mickael;
Pavlov, Dmitry;
Pitjeva, Elena V.;
Skripnichenko, Vladimir I.;
Wallace, Patrick
Submitted: 2015-07-15
The IAU Commission 4 Working Group on Standardizing Access to Ephemerides
recommends the use of the Spacecraft and Planet Kernel (SPK) format as a
standard format for the position ephemerides of planets and other natural solar
system bodies, and the use of the Planetary Constants Kernel (PCK) format for
the orientation of these bodies. It further recommends that other supporting
data be stored in a text PCK. These formats were developed for use by the SPICE
Toolkit by the Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility of NASA's Jet
Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The CALCEPH library developed by the Institut de
mecanique celeste de calcul des ephemerides (IMCCE) is also able to make use of
these files. High accuracy ephemerides available in files conforming to the SPK
and PCK formats include: the Development Ephemerides (DE) from JPL, Integrateur
Numerique Planetaire de l'Observatoire de Paris (INPOP) from IMCCE, and the
Ephemerides Planets and the Moon (EPM), developed by the Institute for Applied
Astronomy (IAA). The bulk of this report is a description of the portion of PCK
and SPK formats required for these ephemerides. New SPK and PCK data types,
both called Type 20: Chebyshev (Velocity Only), have been added. Other changes
to the specification are (i) a new object identification number for coordinate
time ephemerides and (ii) a set of three new data types that use the TCB rather
than the TDB time scale for the ephemerides, but are otherwise identical to
their TDB versions.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.1067 [pdf] - 1222399
Astrometry of Cassini with the VLBA to Improve the Saturn Ephemeris
Submitted: 2014-10-04
Planetary ephemerides have been developed and improved over centuries. They
are a fundamental tool for understanding solar system dynamics, and essential
for planetary and small body mass determinations, occultation predictions,
high-precision tests of general relativity, pulsar timing, and interplanetary
spacecraft navigation. This paper presents recent results from a continuing
program of high-precision astrometric very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI)
observations of the Cassini spacecraft orbiting Saturn, using the Very Long
Baseline Array (VLBA). We have previously shown that VLBA measurements can be
combined with spacecraft orbit determinations from Doppler and range tracking
and VLBI links to the inertial extragalactic reference frame (ICRF) to provide
the most accurate barycentric positions currently available for Saturn. Here we
report an additional five years of VLBA observations along with improved phase
reference source positions, resulting in an improvement in residuals with
respect to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's dynamical ephemeris.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6950 [pdf] - 822615
Constraints on MOND theory from radio tracking data of the Cassini
spacecraft
Submitted: 2014-02-27, last modified: 2014-04-29
The MOdified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) is an attempt to modify the
gravitation theory to solve the Dark Matter problem. This phenomenology is very
successful at the galactic level. The main effect produced by MOND in the Solar
System is called the External Field Effect parametrized by the parameter $Q_2$.
We have used 9 years of Cassini range and Doppler measurements to constrain
$Q_2$. Our estimate of this parameter based on Cassini data is given by $Q_2=(3
\pm 3)\times 10^{-27} \ \rm{s^{-2}}$ which shows no deviation from General
Relativity and excludes a large part of the relativistic MOND theories. This
limit can also be interpreted as a limit on a external tidal potential acting
on the Solar System coming from the internal mass of our galaxy (including Dark
Matter) or from a new hypothetical body.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.1365 [pdf] - 793621
Tests of Gravitation at Solar System scales beyond the PPN formalism
Submitted: 2014-03-06
In this communication, the current tests of gravitation available at Solar
System scales are recalled. These tests rely mainly on two frameworks: the PPN
framework and the search for a fifth force. Some motivations are given to look
for deviations from General Relativity in other frameworks than the two
extensively considered. A recent analysis of Cassini data in a MOND framework
is presented. Furthermore, possibilities to constrain Standard Model Extension
parameters using Solar System data are developed.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.7857 [pdf] - 705914
Corner-cube retro-reflector instrument for advanced lunar laser ranging
Submitted: 2012-10-29, last modified: 2012-11-01
Lunar laser ranging (LLR) has made major contributions to our understanding
of the Moon's internal structure and the dynamics of the Earth-Moon system.
Because of the recent improvements of the ground-based laser ranging
facilities, the present LLR measurement accuracy is limited by the
retro-reflectors currently on the lunar surface, which are arrays of small
corner-cubes. Because of lunar librations, the surfaces of these arrays do not,
in general, point directly at the Earth. This effect results in a spread of
arrival times, because each cube that comprises the retroreflector is at a
slightly different distance from the Earth, leading to the reduced ranging
accuracy. Thus, a single, wide aperture corner-cube could have a clear
advantage. In addition, after nearly four decades of successful operations the
retro-reflectors arrays currently on the Moon started to show performance
degradation; as a result, they yield still useful, but much weaker return
signals. Thus, fresh and bright instruments on the lunar surface are needed to
continue precision LLR measurements. We have developed a new retro-reflector
design to enable advanced LLR operations. It is based on a single, hollow
corner cube with a large aperture for which preliminary thermal, mechanical,
and optical design and analysis have been performed. The new instrument will be
able to reach an Earth-Moon range precision of 1-mm in a single pulse while
being subjected to significant thermal variations present on the lunar surface,
and will have low mass to allow robotic deployment. Here we report on our
design results and instrument development effort.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.0264 [pdf] - 1042312
VLBA Astrometric Observations of the Cassini Spacecraft at Saturn
Submitted: 2010-12-01
The planetary ephemeris is an essential tool for interplanetary spacecraft
navigation, studies of solar system dynamics (including, for example,
barycenter corrections for pulsar timing ephemeredes), the prediction of
occultations, and tests of general relativity. We are carrying out a series of
astrometric VLBI observations of the Cassini spacecraft currently in orbit
around Saturn, using the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA). These observations
provide positions for the center of mass of Saturn in the International
Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) with accuracies ~0.3 milli-arcsecond (1.5
nrad), or about 2 km at the average distance of Saturn. This paper reports
results from eight observing epochs between 2006 October and 2009 April. These
data are combined with two VLBA observations by other investigators in 2004 and
a Cassini-based gravitational deflection measurement by Fomalont et al. in 2009
to constrain a new ephemeris (DE 422). The DE 422 post-fit residuals for Saturn
with respect to the VLBA data are generally 0.2 mas, but additional
observations are needed to improve the positions of all of our phase reference
sources to this level. Over time we expect to be able to improve the accuracy
of all three coordinates in the Saturn ephemeris (latitude, longitude, and
range) by a factor of at least three. This will represent a significant
improvement not just in the Saturn ephemeris but also in the link between the
inner and outer solar system ephemeredes and in the link to the inertial ICRF.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.3607 [pdf] - 1034417
Measuring the mass of solar system planets using pulsar timing
Champion, D. J.;
Hobbs, G. B.;
Manchester, R. N.;
Edwards, R. T.;
Backer, D. C.;
Bailes, M.;
Bhat, N. D. R.;
Burke-Spolaor, S.;
Coles, W.;
Demorest, P. B.;
Ferdman, R. D.;
Folkner, W. M.;
Hotan, A. W.;
Kramer, M.;
Lommen, A. N.;
Nice, D. J.;
Purver, M. B.;
Sarkissian, J. M.;
Stairs, I. H.;
van Straten, W.;
Verbiest, J. P. W.;
Yardley, D. R. B.
Submitted: 2010-08-21
High-precision pulsar timing relies on a solar-system ephemeris in order to
convert times of arrival (TOAs) of pulses measured at an observatory to the
solar system barycenter. Any error in the conversion to the barycentric TOAs
leads to a systematic variation in the observed timing residuals; specifically,
an incorrect planetary mass leads to a predominantly sinusoidal variation
having a period and phase associated with the planet's orbital motion about the
Sun. By using an array of pulsars (PSRs J0437-4715, J1744-1134, J1857+0943,
J1909-3744), the masses of the planetary systems from Mercury to Saturn have
been determined. These masses are consistent with the best-known masses
determined by spacecraft observations, with the mass of the Jovian system,
9.547921(2)E-4 Msun, being significantly more accurate than the mass determined
from the Pioneer and Voyager spacecraft, and consistent with but less accurate
than the value from the Galileo spacecraft. While spacecraft are likely to
produce the most accurate measurements for individual solar system bodies, the
pulsar technique is sensitive to planetary system masses and has the potential
to provide the most accurate values of these masses for some planets.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.5100 [pdf] - 26801
Units of relativistic time scales and associated quantities
Submitted: 2009-07-29, last modified: 2009-08-29
This note suggests nomenclature for dealing with the units of various
astronomical quantities that are used with the relativistic time scales TT,
TDB, TCB and TCG. It is suggested to avoid wordings like "TDB units" and "TT
units" and avoid contrasting them to "SI units". The quantities intended for
use with TCG, TCB, TT or TDB should be called "TCG-compatible",
"TCB-compatible", "TT-compatible" or "TDB-compatible", respectively. The names
of the units second and meter for numerical values of all these quantities
should be used with out any adjectives. This suggestion comes from a special
discussion forum created within IAU Commission 52 "Relativity in Fundamental
Astronomy".
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0312049 [pdf] - 61262
SIMsim: An End-to-End Simulation of The Space Interferometer Mission
Submitted: 2003-12-01
We present the basic elements and first results of an end-to-end simulation
package whose purpose is to test the validity of the Space Interferometer
Mission design. The fundamental simulation time step is one millisecond, with
substructure at 1/8 ms, and the total duration of the simulation is five years.
The end product of a given "wide-angle" astrometry run is an estimated grid
star catalog over the entire sky with an accuracy of about 4 micro-arcseconds.
SIMsim is divided into five separate modules that communicate via data pipes.
The first generates the 'truth' data on the spacecraft structure and laser
metrology. The second module generates uncorrupted fringes for the three SIM
interferometers, based on the current spacecraft orientation, target stars'
positions, etc. The third module reads out the CCD white light fringe data at
specified times, corrupting that and the metrology data with appropriate
errors. The data stream out of this module represents the basic data stream on
the simulated spacecraft. The fourth module performs fringe-fitting tasks on
this data, recovering the total path delay, and the fifth and final module
inverts the entire metrology/delay dataset to ultimately determine the
instantaneous path delay on a fiducial baseline fixed in space. (Pathlength
feed forward is used every few milliseconds to re-position the interferometer
to keep the fringes in the delay window.) The average of all such delays over
an integration time (typically 30 s) is reported as one of several hundred
thousand measured stellar delays over the five-year period, which are then
inverted to produce the simulated catalog.
Future plans include taking into account more sources of error from the SIM
error budget and including narrow angle observations in the observing plan.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9912327 [pdf] - 109990
Enabling concepts for a dual spacecraft formation-flying optical
interferometer for NASA's ST3 mission
Submitted: 1999-12-15
We present the enabling concept and technology for a dual spacecraft
formation-flying optical interferometer, to be launched into a deep space orbit
as Space Technology 3. The combiner spacecraft makes use of a nested cat's eye
delay line configuration that minimizes wavefront distortion and stores 20 m of
optical pathlength in a package of \sim 1.5 m length. A parabolic trajectory
for the secondary collector spacecraft enables baselines of up to 200 m for a
fixed 20 m stored delay and spacecraft separations of up to 1 km.