Normalized to: Fisher, T.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.03631 [pdf] - 2089206
Detectability of Life Using Oxygen on Pelagic Planets and Water Worlds
Glaser, Donald M;
Hartnett, Hilairy Ellen;
Desch, Steven J.;
Unterborn, Cayman T.;
Anbar, Ariel;
Buessecker, Steffen;
Fisher, Theresa;
Glaser, Steven;
Kane, Stephen R.;
Lisse, Carey M.;
Millsaps, Camerian;
Neuer, Susanne;
ORourke, Joseph G.;
Santos, Nuno;
Walker, Sara Imari;
Zolotov, Mikhail
Submitted: 2020-04-07
The search for life on exoplanets is one of the grand scientific challenges
of our time. The strategy to date has been to find (e.g., through transit
surveys like Kepler) Earth-like exoplanets in their stars habitable zone, then
use transmission spectroscopy to measure biosignature gases, especially oxygen,
in the planets atmospheres (e.g., using JWST, the James Webb Space Telescope).
Already there are more such planets than can be observed by JWST, and missions
like the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite and others will find more. A
better understanding of the geochemical cycles relevant to biosignature gases
is needed, to prioritize targets for costly follow-up observations and to help
design future missions. We define a Detectability Index to quantify the
likelihood that a biosignature gas could be assigned a biological vs.
non-biological origin. We apply this index to the case of oxygen gas, O2, on
Earth-like planets with varying water contents. We demonstrate that on
Earth-like exoplanets with 0.2 weight percent (wt%) water (i.e., no exposed
continents) a reduced flux of bioessential phosphorus limits the export of
photosynthetically produced atmospheric O2 to levels indistinguishable from
geophysical production by photolysis of water plus hydrogen escape. Higher
water contents >1wt% that lead to high-pressure ice mantles further slow
phosphorus cycling. Paradoxically, the maximum water content allowing use of O2
as a biosignature, 0.2wt%, is consistent with no water based on mass and
radius. Thus, the utility of an O2 biosignature likely requires the direct
detection of both water and land on a planet.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.05791 [pdf] - 1704260
Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life
Schwieterman, Edward W.;
Kiang, Nancy Y.;
Parenteau, Mary N.;
Harman, Chester E.;
DasSarma, Shiladitya;
Fisher, Theresa M.;
Arney, Giada N.;
Hartnett, Hilairy E.;
Reinhard, Christopher T.;
Olson, Stephanie L.;
Meadows, Victoria S.;
Cockell, Charles S.;
Walker, Sara I.;
Grenfell, John Lee;
Hegde, Siddharth;
Rugheimer, Sarah;
Hu, Renyu;
Lyons, Timothy W.
Submitted: 2017-05-16, last modified: 2018-06-25
In the coming years and decades, advanced space- and ground-based
observatories will allow an unprecedented opportunity to probe the atmospheres
and surfaces of potentially habitable exoplanets for signatures of life. Life
on Earth, through its gaseous products and reflectance and scattering
properties, has left its fingerprint on the spectrum of our planet. Aided by
the universality of the laws of physics and chemistry, we turn to Earth's
biosphere, both in the present and through geologic time, for analog signatures
that will aid in the search for life elsewhere. Considering the insights gained
from modern and ancient Earth, and the broader array of hypothetical exoplanet
possibilities, we have compiled a state-of-the-art overview of our current
understanding of potential exoplanet biosignatures including gaseous, surface,
and temporal biosignatures. We additionally survey biogenic spectral features
that are well-known in the specialist literature but have not yet been robustly
vetted in the context of exoplanet biosignatures. We briefly review advances in
assessing biosignature plausibility, including novel methods for determining
chemical disequilibrium from remotely obtainable data and assessment tools for
determining the minimum biomass required for a given atmospheric signature. We
focus particularly on advances made since the seminal review by Des Marais et
al. (2002). The purpose of this work is not to propose new biosignatures
strategies, a goal left to companion papers in this series, but to review the
current literature, draw meaningful connections between seemingly disparate
areas, and clear the way for a path forward.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.06714 [pdf] - 1621567
Life Beyond the Solar System: Remotely Detectable Biosignatures
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn;
Kiang, Nancy Y.;
Parenteau, Niki;
Catling, David C.;
DasSarma, Shiladitya;
Fujii, Yuka;
Harman, Chester E.;
Lenardic, Adrian;
Pallé, Enric;
Reinhard, Christopher T.;
Schwieterman, Edward W.;
Schneider, Jean;
Smith, Harrison B.;
Tamura, Motohide;
Angerhausen, Daniel;
Arney, Giada;
Airapetian, Vladimir S.;
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Cockell, Charles S.;
Cronin, Leroy;
Deitrick, Russell;
Del Genio, Anthony;
Fisher, Theresa;
Gelino, Dawn M.;
Grenfell, J. Lee;
Hartnett, Hilairy E.;
Hegde, Siddharth;
Hori, Yasunori;
Kaçar, Betül;
Krissansen-Totten, Joshua;
Lyons, Timothy;
Moore, William B.;
Narita, Norio;
Olson, Stephanie L.;
Rauer, Heike;
Robinson, Tyler D.;
Rugheimer, Sarah;
Siegler, Nick;
Shkolnik, Evgenya L.;
Stapelfeldt, Karl R.;
Walker, Sara
Submitted: 2018-01-20
For the first time in human history, we will soon be able to apply the
scientific method to the question "Are We Alone?" The rapid advance of
exoplanet discovery, planetary systems science, and telescope technology will
soon allow scientists to search for life beyond our Solar System through direct
observation of extrasolar planets. This endeavor will occur alongside searches
for habitable environments and signs of life within our Solar System. While the
searches are thematically related and will inform each other, they will require
separate observational techniques. The search for life on exoplanets holds
potential through the great diversity of worlds to be explored beyond our Solar
System. However, there are also unique challenges related to the relatively
limited data this search will obtain on any individual world. This white paper
reviews the scientific community's ability to use data from future telescopes
to search for life on exoplanets. This material summarizes products from the
Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls (EBWWW). The EBWWW was
constituted by a series of online and in person activities, with participation
from the international exoplanet and astrobiology communities, to assess state
of the science and future research needs for the remote detection of life on
planets outside our Solar System.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.02390 [pdf] - 1720948
The OSIRIS-REx Thermal Emission Spectrometer (OTES) Instrument
Christensen, P. R.;
Hamilton, V. E.;
Mehall, G. L.;
Pelham, D.;
O'Donnell, W.;
Anwar, S.;
Bowles, H.;
Chase, S.;
Fahlgren, J.;
Farkas, Z.;
Fisher, T.;
James, O.;
Kubik, I.;
Lazbin, I.;
Miner, M.;
Rassas, M.;
Schulze, L.;
Shamordola, K.;
Tourville, T.;
West, G.;
Woodward, R.;
Lauretta, D.
Submitted: 2017-04-07
The OSIRIS-REx Thermal Emission Spectrometer (OTES) will provide remote
measurements of mineralogy and thermophysical properties of Bennu to map its
surface, help select the OSIRIS-REx sampling site, and investigate the
Yarkovsky effect. OTES is a Fourier transform spectrometer covering the
spectral range 5.71 - 100 {\mu}m (1750 - 100 cm-1) with a spectral sample
interval of 8.66 cm-1 and a 6.5-mrad field of view. The OTES telescope is a
15.2-cm diameter Cassegrain telescope that feeds a flat-plate Michelson moving
mirror mounted on a linear voice-coil motor assembly. A single uncooled
deuterated L-alanine doped triglycine sulfate (DLATGS) pyroelectric detector is
used to sample the interferogram every two seconds. Redundant ~0.855 {\mu}m
laser diodes are used in a metrology interferometer to provide precise moving
mirror control and IR sampling at 772 Hz. The beamsplitter is a 38-mm diameter,
1-mm thick chemical vapor deposited diamond with an antireflection
microstructure to minimize surface reflection. An internal calibration cone
blackbody target provides radiometric calibration. The radiometric precision in
a single spectrum is <= 2.2 x 10-8 W cm-2 sr-1/cm-1 between 300 and 1350 cm-1.
The absolute integrated radiance error is <1% for scene temperatures ranging
from 150 to 380 K. The overall OTES envelope size is 37.5 x 28.9 x 52.2 cm, and
the mass is 6.27 kg. The power consumption is 10.8 W average. The OTES was
developed by Arizona State University with Moog Broad Reach developing the
electronics. OTES was integrated, tested, and radiometrically calibrated on the
Arizona State University campus in Tempe, AZ.