Normalized to: Fienga, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.04307 [pdf] - 1983803
Constraining the mass of the graviton with the planetary ephemeris INPOP
Submitted: 2019-01-09, last modified: 2019-08-01
We use the planetary ephemeris INPOP17b to constrain the mass of the graviton
in the Newtonian limit. We also give an interpretation of this result for a
specific case of fifth force framework. We find that the residuals for the
Cassini spacecraft significantly (90\% C.L.) degrade for Compton wavelengths of
the graviton smaller than $1.83\times 10^{13}$ km, corresponding to a graviton
mass bigger than $6.76\times 10^{-23} eV/c^2$. This limit is comparable in
magnitude to the one obtained by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration in the radiative
regime. We also use this specific example to illustrate why constraints on
alternative theories of gravity obtained from postfit residuals are generically
overestimated.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.07205 [pdf] - 1922447
Observational constraint on the radius and oblateness of the lunar
core-mantle boundary
Submitted: 2019-03-17, last modified: 2019-06-21
Lunar laser ranging (LLR) data and Apollo seismic data analyses, revealed
independent evidence for the presence of a fluid lunar core. However, the size
of the lunar fluid core remained uncertain by $\pm55$ km (encompassing two
contrasting 2011 Apollo seismic data analyses). Here we show that a new
description of the lunar interior's dynamical model provides a determination of
the radius and geometry of the lunar core-mantle boundary (CMB) from the LLR
observations. We compare the present-day lunar core oblateness obtained from
LLR analysis with the expected hydrostatic model values, over a range of
previously expected CMB radii. The findings suggest a core oblateness
($f_c=(2.2\pm0.6)\times10^{-4}$) that satisfies the assumption of hydrostatic
equilibrium over a tight range of lunar CMB radii ($\mathcal{R}_{CMB}=381\pm12$
km). Our estimates of a presently-relaxed lunar CMB translates to a core mass
fraction in the range of $1.59-1.77\%$ with a present-day Free Core Nutation
(FCN) within $(367\pm100)$ years.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.01890 [pdf] - 1851641
The homogeneous internal structure of CM-like asteroid (41) Daphne
Carry, B.;
Vachier, F.;
Berthier, J.;
Marsset, M.;
Vernazza, P.;
Grice, J.;
Merline, W. J.;
Lagadec, E.;
Fienga, A.;
Conrad, A.;
Podlewska-Gaca, E.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Viikinkoski, M.;
Hanuš, J.;
Dumas, C.;
Drummond, J. D.;
Tamblyn, P. M.;
Chapman, C. R.;
Behrend, R.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bartczak, P.;
Benkhaldoun, Z.;
Birlan, M.;
Castillo-Rogez, J.;
Cipriani, F.;
Colas, F.;
Drouard, A.;
Ďurech, J.;
Enke, B. L.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Ferrais, M.;
Fetick, R.;
Fusco, T.;
Gillon, M.;
Jehin, E.;
Jorda, L.;
Kaasalainen, M.;
Keppler, M.;
Kryszczynska, A.;
Lamy, P.;
Marchis, F.;
Marciniak, A.;
Michalowski, T.;
Michel, P.;
Pajuelo, M.;
Tanga, P.;
Vigan, A.;
Warner, B.;
Witasse, O.;
Yang, B.;
Zurlo, A.
Submitted: 2019-01-07
Context. CM-like asteroids (Ch and Cgh classes) are a major population within
the broader C-complex, encompassing about 10% of the mass of the main asteroid
belt. Their internal structure has been predicted to be homogeneous, based on
their compositional similarity as inferred from spectroscopy (Vernazza et al.,
2016, AJ 152, 154) and numerical modeling of their early thermal evolution
(Bland & Travis, 2017, Sci. Adv. 3, e1602514). Aims. Here we aim to test this
hypothesis by deriving the density of the CM-like asteroid (41) Daphne from
detailed modeling of its shape and the orbit of its small satellite. Methods.
We observed Daphne and its satellite within our imaging survey with the Very
Large Telescope extreme adaptive-optics SPHERE/ZIMPOL camera (ID 199.C-0074, PI
P. Vernazza) and complemented this data set with earlier Keck/NIRC2 and
VLT/NACO observations. We analyzed the dynamics of the satellite with our
Genoid meta-heuristic algorithm. Combining our high-angular resolution images
with optical lightcurves and stellar occultations, we determine the spin
period, orientation, and 3-D shape, using our ADAM shape modeling algorithm.
Results. The satellite orbits Daphne on an equatorial, quasi-circular, prograde
orbit, like the satellites of many other large main-belt asteroids. The shape
model of Daphne reveals several large flat areas that could be large impact
craters. The mass determined from this orbit combined with the volume computed
from the shape model implies a density for Daphne of 1.77+/-0.26 g/cm3 (3
{\sigma}). This density is consistent with a primordial CM-like homogeneous
internal structure with some level of macroporosity (~17%). Conclusions. Based
on our analysis of the density of Daphne and 75 other Ch/Cgh-type asteroids
gathered from the literature, we conclude that the primordial internal
structure of the CM parent bodies was homogeneous.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.02461 [pdf] - 1641403
Exogenous origin of hydration on asteroid (16) Psyche: The role of
hydrated asteroid families
Submitted: 2018-01-08
Asteroid (16) Psyche, that for long was the largest M-type with no detection
of hydration features in its spectrum, was recently discovered to have a weak 3
micron band and thus it eventually was added to the group of hydrated
asteroids. Its relatively high density in combination with the high radar
albedo, led to classify the asteroid as a metallic object, possibly a core of a
differentiated body, remnant of "hit-and-run" collisions. The detection of
hydration is, in principle, inconsistent with a pure metallic origin of this
body. Here we consider the scenario that the hydration on its surface is
exogenous and was delivered by hydrated impactors. We show that impacting
asteroids that belong to families whose members have the 3 m band can deliver
the hydrated material to Psyche. We developed a collisional model with which we
test all the dark carbonaceous asteroid families, which contain hydrated
members. We find that the major source of hydrated impactors is the family of
Themis, with a total implanted mass on Psyche to be of the order of 10^14 kg.
However, the hydrated fraction could be only a few per cent of the implanted
mass, as the water content in carbonaceous chondrite meteorites, the best
analogue for the Themis asteroid family, is typically a few per cent of their
mass.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.06443 [pdf] - 1582755
Lunar laser ranging in infrfared at hte Grasse laser station
Courde, C.;
Torre, J. M.;
Samain, E.;
Martinot-Lagarde, G.;
Aimar, M.;
Albanese, D.;
Exertier, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Mariey, H.;
Metris, G.;
Viot, H.;
Viswanathan, V.
Submitted: 2017-04-21
For many years, lunar laser ranging (LLR) observations using a green
wavelength have suffered an inhomogeneity problem both temporally and
spatially. This paper reports on the implementation of a new infrared detection
at the Grasse LLR station and describes how infrared telemetry improves this
situation. Our first results show that infrared detection permits us to densify
the observations and allows measurements during the new and the full Moon
periods. The link budget improvement leads to homogeneous telemetric
measurements on each lunar retro-reflector. Finally, a surprising result is
obtained on the Lunokhod 2 array which attains the same efficiency as Lunokhod
1 with an infrared laser link, although those two targets exhibit a
differential efficiency of six with a green laser link.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04303 [pdf] - 1523840
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million
proper motions and parallaxes
Lindegren, L.;
Lammers, U.;
Bastian, U.;
Hernández, J.;
Klioner, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Bombrun, A.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Abbas, U.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anton, S.;
Bach, N.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Berthier, J.;
Bianchi, L.;
Biermann, M.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Carlucci, T.;
Castañeda, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Clotet, M.;
Crosta, M.;
Davidson, M.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Geyer, R.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hauser, M.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Löffler, W.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Portell, J.;
Riva, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Serraller, I.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R.;
Spagna, A.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Zschocke, S.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Gracia, G.;
Raison, F.;
Lister, T.;
Marchant, J.;
Messineo, R.;
Soffel, M.;
Osorio, J.;
de Torres, A.;
O'Mullane, W.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1
billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by
the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give
a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the
model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in
common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric
single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from
the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by
neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an
analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison
with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down
to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to
Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors
depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond
(mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to
~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is
aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than
0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03
mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the
Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the
nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the
quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what
is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent
a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical
definition of the optical reference frame.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.06116 [pdf] - 1378959
Constraints on the location of a possible 9th planet derived from the
Cassini data
Submitted: 2016-02-19, last modified: 2016-02-23
To explain the unusual distribution of Kuiper Belt objects, several authors
have advocated the existence of a super-Earth planet in the outer solar system.
It has recently been proposed that a 10 M$_{\oplus}$ object with an orbit of
700 AU semi major axis and 0.6 eccentricity can explain the observed
distribution of Kuiper Belt objects around Sedna. Here we use the INPOP
planetary ephemerides model as a sensor for testing for an additional body in
the solar system. We test the possibility of adding the proposed planet without
increasing the residuals of the planetary ephemerides, fitted over the whole
INPOP planetary data sample. We demonstrate that the presence of such an object
is not compatible with the most sensitive data set, the Cassini radio ranging
data, if its true anomaly is in the intervals $[-130^\circ:-100^\circ]$ or
$[-65^\circ : 85^\circ]$. Moreover, we find that the addition of this object
can reduce the Cassini residuals, with a most probable position given by a true
anomaly $v = {117.8^\circ}^{ + 11^\circ}_{ - 10^\circ} $.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00947 [pdf] - 1335563
Tests of GR with INPOP15a planetary ephemerides: estimations of possible
supplementary advances of perihelia for Mercury and Saturn
Submitted: 2016-01-05
Planetary ephemerides are a good tool for studying general relativity at the
scale of our solar system. We present here new evaluations of advances of
perihelia for Mercury and Saturn.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.01546 [pdf] - 1306246
Historical Reflections on the Work of IAU Commission 4 (Ephemerides)
Kaplan, George H.;
Bangert, John A.;
Fienga, Agnes;
Folkner, William;
Hohenkerk, Catherine;
Lukashova, Marina;
Pitjeva, Elena V.;
Seidelmann, P. Kenneth;
Sveshnikov, Michael;
Urban, Sean;
Vondrak, Jan;
Weratschnig, Julia;
Williams, James G.
Submitted: 2015-11-04
As part of a reorganization of the International Astronomical Union (IAU),
Commission 4 (Ephemerides) went out of existence after the IAU General Assembly
in August 2015. This paper presents brief discussions of some of the
developments in fundamental astronomy that have influenced and been influenced
by the work of Commission 4 over its 96-year history. The paper also presents
notes about some of the publications of the national institutions that have
played an essential role in the commission's mission. The contents of this
paper were submitted for Commission 4's final report, to appear in IAU
Transactions Vol. XXIX-A.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.0484 [pdf] - 1266872
INPOP new release: INPOP13b
Submitted: 2014-05-02, last modified: 2015-08-25
Based on the use of MESSENGER radiotracking data in the construction of new
Mercury ephemerides (Verma et al. 2014) a new planetary ephemerides INPOP13b
was built including Mercury improvements but also improvements on the Mars
orbit and on the tie of INPOP planetary ephemerides to ICRF in general.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.04291 [pdf] - 1247182
Report of the IAU Commission 4 Working Group on Standardizing Access to
Ephemerides and File Format Specification
Hilton, James L.;
Acton, Charles;
Arlot, Jean-Eudes;
Bell, Steven A.;
Capitaine, Nicole;
Fienga, Agnes;
Folkner, William M.;
Gastineau, Mickael;
Pavlov, Dmitry;
Pitjeva, Elena V.;
Skripnichenko, Vladimir I.;
Wallace, Patrick
Submitted: 2015-07-15
The IAU Commission 4 Working Group on Standardizing Access to Ephemerides
recommends the use of the Spacecraft and Planet Kernel (SPK) format as a
standard format for the position ephemerides of planets and other natural solar
system bodies, and the use of the Planetary Constants Kernel (PCK) format for
the orientation of these bodies. It further recommends that other supporting
data be stored in a text PCK. These formats were developed for use by the SPICE
Toolkit by the Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility of NASA's Jet
Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The CALCEPH library developed by the Institut de
mecanique celeste de calcul des ephemerides (IMCCE) is also able to make use of
these files. High accuracy ephemerides available in files conforming to the SPK
and PCK formats include: the Development Ephemerides (DE) from JPL, Integrateur
Numerique Planetaire de l'Observatoire de Paris (INPOP) from IMCCE, and the
Ephemerides Planets and the Moon (EPM), developed by the Institute for Applied
Astronomy (IAA). The bulk of this report is a description of the portion of PCK
and SPK formats required for these ephemerides. New SPK and PCK data types,
both called Type 20: Chebyshev (Velocity Only), have been added. Other changes
to the specification are (i) a new object identification number for coordinate
time ephemerides and (ii) a set of three new data types that use the TCB rather
than the TDB time scale for the ephemerides, but are otherwise identical to
their TDB versions.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.4932 [pdf] - 868849
Tests of General relativity with planetary orbits and Monte Carlo
simulations
Submitted: 2014-09-17
Based on the new developped planetary ephemerides INPOP13c, determinations of
acceptable intervals of General Relativity violation in considering
simultaneously the PPN parameters $\beta$, PPN $\gamma$, the flattening of the
sun $J_{2}^\odot$ and time variation of the gravitational mass of the sun $\mu$
are obtained in using Monte Carlo simulation coupled with basic genetic
algorithm. Possible time variations of the gravitational constant G are also
deduced. Discussions are lead about the better choice of indicators for the
goodness-of-fit for each run and limits consistent with general relativity are
obtained simultaneously.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.0473 [pdf] - 818275
Interests of a new lunar laser instrumentation on the ESO NTT Telescope
Fienga, A.;
Courde, C.;
Torre, J. M.;
Manche, H.;
Murphy, T.;
Mueller, J.;
Laskar, J.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Biskupek, L.;
Hofmann, F.;
Capitaine, N.;
Rambaux, N.
Submitted: 2014-05-02, last modified: 2014-05-05
We analyze the impact of the installation of a lunar laser ranging device on
the NTT 3.6m ESO telescope. With such an instrument, the scientific communities
of fundamental physics and solar system formation will highly benefit of the
only LLR station in the Southern Hemisphere. The quality of the NTT 3.6 meter
telescope will also greatly complement the LLR 3.5 meter Apache Point telescope
(3.5 m) instrument in the Northern Hemisphere (USA) which is the best
instrument for tracking the Moon since 2006. Finally, we also consider the
technical characteristics of such installation including the observational
constraints.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1306.5569 [pdf] - 1172238
Use of MESSENGER radioscience data to improve planetary ephemeris and to
test general relativity
Submitted: 2013-06-24, last modified: 2013-11-28
The current knowledge of Mercury orbit has mainly been gained by direct radar
ranging obtained from the 60s to 1998 and by five Mercury flybys made by
Mariner 10 in the 70s, and MESSENGER made in 2008 and 2009. On March 18, 2011,
MESSENGER became the first spacecraft to orbit Mercury. The radioscience
observations acquired during the orbital phase of MESSENGER drastically
improved our knowledge of the orbit of Mercury. An accurate MESSENGER orbit is
obtained by fitting one-and-half years of tracking data using GINS orbit
determination software. The systematic error in the Earth-Mercury geometric
positions, also called range bias, obtained from GINS are then used to fit the
INPOP dynamical modeling of the planet motions. An improved ephemeris of the
planets is then obtained, INPOP13a, and used to perform general relativity
tests of PPN-formalism. Our estimations of PPN parameters (beta and gamma?) are
more stringent than previous results.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.1510 [pdf] - 611378
INPOP new release: INPOP10e
Submitted: 2013-01-08
The INPOP ephemerides have known several improvements and evolutions since
the first INPOP06 release (Fienga et al. 2008) in 2008. In 2010, anticipating
the IAU 2012 resolutions, adjustement of the gravitational solar mass with a
fixed astronomical unit (AU) has been for the first time implemented in
INPOP10a (Fienga et al. 2011) together with improvements in the asteroid mass
determinations. With the latest INPOP10e version, such advancements have been
enhanced and studies about solar corona have also been investigated (Verma et
al. 2012). The use of planetary ephemerides for several physical applications
are presented here from electronic densities of solar slow and fast winds to
asteroid mass determinations and tests of general relativity operated with
INPOP10a. Perspectives will also be drawn especially related to the analysis of
the Messenger spacecraft data for the planetary orbits and future computation
of the time variations of the gravitational mass of the sun.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.0635 [pdf] - 558243
Planetary ephemerides and gravity tests in the solar system
Submitted: 2012-09-04
We review here the tests of fundamental physics based on the dynamics of
solar system objects.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.5546 [pdf] - 403560
The INPOP10a planetary ephemeris and its applications in fundamental
physics
Submitted: 2011-08-29
Compared to the previous INPOP versions, the INPOP10a planetary and lunar
ephemeris has several improvements. For the planets of our solar system, no big
change was brought in the dynamics but improvements were implemented in the
fitting process, the data sets used in the fit and in the selection of fitted
parameters. We report here the main characteristics of the planetary part of
INPOP10a like the fit of the product of the Solar mass with the gravitational
constant (GM$_{\odot}$) instead of the astronomical unit. Determinations of PPN
parameters as well as adjustments of the Sun J2 and of asteroid masses are also
presented. New advances of nodes and perihelia of planets were also estimated
and are given here. As for INPOP08, INPOP10a provides to the user, positions
and velocities of the planets, the moon, the rotation angles of the Earth and
the Moon as well as TT-TDB chebychev polynomials at http://www.imcce.fr/inpop
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.1084 [pdf] - 1490616
La2010: A new orbital solution for the long term motion of the Earth
Submitted: 2011-03-05
We present here a new solution for the astronomical computation of the
orbital motion of the Earth spanning from 0 to -250 Myr. The main improvement
with respect to the previous numerical solution La2004 (Laskar et al. 2004) is
an improved adjustment of the parameters and initial conditions through a fit
over 1 Myr to a special version of the high accurate numerical ephemeris
INPOP08 (Fienga et al. 2009). The precession equations have also been entirely
revised and are no longer averaged over the orbital motion of the Earth and
Moon. This new orbital solution is now valid over more than 50 Myr in the past
or in the future with proper phases of the eccentricity variations. Due to
chaotic behavior, the precision of the solution decreases rapidly beyond this
time span, and we discuss the behavior of various solutions beyond 50 Myr. For
paleoclimate calibrations, we provide several different solutions that are all
compatible with the most precise planetary ephemeris. We have thus reached the
time where geological data are now required to discriminate among planetary
orbital solutions beyond 50 Myr.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.4419 [pdf] - 265805
Planetary and Lunar ephemerides, INPOP10A
Submitted: 2010-11-19
The Planetary and Lunar ephemerides INPOP10a version has several improvements
in the fitting process, the data sets used in the fit and in the general
features of the solution. No big change was brought in the dynamics. As a
consequence of these changes, the extrapolation capabilities of INPOP10a are
improved compared to INPOP08, especially for the Earth, Mars, Mercury and
Saturn orbits. As for INPOP08, INPOP10a provides to the user, positions,
velocities of the planets and the moon and TT-TDB chebychev polynomials at
\url{http://www.imcce.fr/inpop}.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.3119 [pdf] - 150380
A ring as a model of the main belt in planetary ephemerides
Submitted: 2010-04-19
We assess the ability of a solid ring to model a global perturbation induced
by several thousands of main-belt asteroids. The ring is first studied in an
analytical framework that provides an estimate of all the ring's parameters
excepting mass. In the second part, numerically estimated perturbations on the
Earth-Mars, Earth-Venus, and Earth-Mercury distances induced by various subsets
of the main-belt population are compared with perturbations induced by a ring.
To account for large uncertainties in the asteroid masses, we obtain results
from Monte Carlo experiments based on asteroid masses randomly generated
according to available data and the statistical asteroid model. The radius of
the ring is analytically estimated at 2.8 AU. A systematic comparison of the
ring with subsets of the main belt shows that, after removing the 300 most
perturbing asteroids, the total main-belt perturbation of the Earth-Mars
distance reaches on average 246 m on the 1969-2010 time interval. A ring with
appropriate mass is able to reduce this effect to 38 m. We show that, by
removing from the main belt ~240 asteroids that are not necessarily the most
perturbing ones, the corresponding total perturbation reaches on average 472 m,
but the ring is able to reduce it down to a few meters, thus accounting for
more than 99% of the total effect.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:0906.2860 [pdf] - 1002572
INPOP08, a 4-D planetary ephemeris: From asteroid and time-scale
computations to ESA Mars Express and Venus Express contributions
Submitted: 2009-06-16, last modified: 2009-08-26
The latest version of the planetary ephemerides developed at the Paris
Observatory and at the Besancon Observatory is presented here. INPOP08 is a
4-dimension ephemeris since it provides to users positions and velocities of
planets and the relation between TT and TDB. Investigations leading to improve
the modeling of asteroids are described as well as the new sets of observations
used for the fit of INPOP08. New observations provided by the European Space
Agency (ESA) deduced from the tracking of the Mars Express (MEX) and Venus
Express (VEX) missions are presented as well as the normal point deduced from
the Cassini mission. We show the huge impact brought by these observations in
the fit of INPOP08, especially in terms of Venus, Saturn and Earth-Moon
barycenter orbits.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.0304 [pdf] - 6649
Quantum Physics Exploring Gravity in the Outer Solar System: The Sagas
Project
Wolf, P.;
Bordé, Ch. J.;
Clairon, A.;
Duchayne, L.;
Landragin, A.;
Lemonde, P.;
Santarelli, G.;
Ertmer, W.;
Rasel, E.;
Cataliotti, F. S.;
Inguscio, M.;
Tino, G. M.;
Gill, P.;
Klein, H.;
Reynaud, S.;
Salomon, C.;
Peik, E.;
Bertolami, O.;
Gil, P.;
Páramos, J.;
Jentsch, C.;
Johann, U.;
Rathke, A.;
Bouyer, P.;
Cacciapuoti, L.;
Izzo, D.;
De Natale, P.;
Christophe, B.;
Touboul, P.;
Turyshev, S. G.;
Anderson, J. D.;
Tobar, M. E.;
Schmidt-Kaler, F.;
Vigué, J.;
Madej, A.;
Marmet, L.;
Angonin, M-C.;
Delva, P.;
Tourrenc, P.;
Metris, G.;
Müller, H.;
Walsworth, R.;
Lu, Z. H.;
Wang, L.;
Bongs, K.;
Toncelli, A.;
Tonelli, M.;
Dittus, H.;
Lämmerzahl, C.;
Galzerano, G.;
Laporta, P.;
Laskar, J.;
Fienga, A.;
Roques, F.;
Sengstock, K.
Submitted: 2007-11-02, last modified: 2008-08-12
We summarise the scientific and technological aspects of the SAGAS (Search
for Anomalous Gravitation using Atomic Sensors) project, submitted to ESA in
June 2007 in response to the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 call for proposals. The
proposed mission aims at flying highly sensitive atomic sensors (optical clock,
cold atom accelerometer, optical link) on a Solar System escape trajectory in
the 2020 to 2030 time-frame. SAGAS has numerous science objectives in
fundamental physics and Solar System science, for example numerous tests of
general relativity and the exploration of the Kuiper belt. The combination of
highly sensitive atomic sensors and of the laser link well adapted for large
distances will allow measurements with unprecedented accuracy and on scales
never reached before. We present the proposed mission in some detail, with
particular emphasis on the science goals and associated measurements.