Normalized to: Fevre, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.01781 [pdf] - 1580346
The XXL survey: first results and future
Pierre, M.;
Adami, C.;
Birkinshaw, M.;
Chiappetti, L.;
Ettori, S.;
Evrard, A.;
Faccioli, L.;
Gastaldello, F.;
Giles, P.;
Horellou, C.;
Iovino, A.;
Koulouridis, E.;
Lidman, C.;
Brun, A. Le;
Maughan, B.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCarthy, I.;
Miyazaki, S.;
Pacaud, F.;
Paltani, S.;
Plionis, M.;
Reiprich, T.;
Sadibekova, T.;
Smolcic, V.;
Snowden, S.;
Surdej, J.;
Tsirou, M.;
Vignali, C.;
Willis, J.;
Alis, S.;
Altieri, B.;
Baran, N.;
Benoist, C.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Bremer, M.;
Butler, A.;
Cappi, A.;
Caretta, C.;
Ciliegi, P.;
Clerc, N.;
Corasaniti, P. S.;
Coupon, J.;
Delhaize, J.;
Delvecchio, I.;
Democles, J.;
Desai, Sh.;
Devriendt, J.;
Dubois, Y.;
Eckert, D.;
Elyiv, A.;
Farahi, A.;
Ferrari, C.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Forman, W.;
Georgantopoulos, I.;
Guglielmo, V.;
Huynh, M.;
Jerlin, N.;
Jones, Ch.;
Lavoie, S.;
Fevre, J. -P. Le;
Lieu, M.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Marulli, F.;
Mantz, A.;
McGee, S.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Melnyk, O.;
Moscardini, L.;
Novak, M.;
Piconcelli, E.;
Poggianti, B.;
Pomarede, D.;
Pompei, E.;
Ponman, T.;
Ceja, M. E. Ramos;
Ranalli, P.;
Rapetti, D.;
Raychaudhury, S.;
Ricci, M.;
Rottgering, H.;
Sahlén, M.;
Sauvageot, J. -L.;
Schimd, C.;
Sereno, M.;
Smith, G. P.;
Umetsu, K.;
Valageas, P.;
Valotti, A.;
Valtchanov, I.;
Veropalumbo, A.;
Ascaso, B.;
Barnes, D.;
De Petris, M.;
Durret, F.;
Donahue, M.;
Ithana, M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Johnston-Hollitt, M.;
Kalfountzou, E.;
Kay, S.;
La Franca, F.;
Okabe, N.;
Muzzin, A.;
Rettura, A.;
Ricci, F.;
Ridl, J.;
Risaliti, G.;
Takizawa, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Truong, N.
Submitted: 2016-10-06, last modified: 2017-07-11
The XXL survey currently covers two 25 sq. deg. patches with XMM observations
of ~10ks. We summarise the scientific results associated with the first release
of the XXL data set, that occurred mid 2016. We review several arguments for
increasing the survey depth to 40 ks during the next decade of XMM operations.
X-ray (z<2) cluster, (z<4) AGN and cosmic background survey science will then
benefit from an extraordinary data reservoir. This, combined with deep
multi-$\lambda$ observations, will lead to solid standalone cosmological
constraints and provide a wealth of information on the formation and evolution
of AGN, clusters and the X-ray background. In particular, it will offer a
unique opportunity to pinpoint the z>1 cluster density. It will eventually
constitute a reference study and an ideal calibration field for the upcoming
eROSITA and Euclid missions.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.04317 [pdf] - 1426198
The XXL Survey: I. Scientific motivations - XMM-Newton observing plan -
Follow-up observations and simulation programme
Pierre, M.;
Pacaud, F.;
Adami, C.;
Alis, S.;
Altieri, B.;
Baran, B.;
Benoist, C.;
Birkinshaw, M.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Bremer, M. N.;
Brusa, M.;
Butler, A.;
Ciliegi, P.;
Chiappetti, L.;
Clerc, N.;
Corasaniti, P. S.;
Coupon, J.;
De Breuck, C.;
Democles, J.;
Desai, S.;
Delhaize, J.;
Devriendt, J.;
Dubois, Y.;
Eckert, D.;
Elyiv, A.;
Ettori, S.;
Evrard, A.;
Faccioli, L.;
Farahi, A.;
Ferrari, C.;
Finet, F.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Gandhi, P.;
Gastaldello, F.;
Gastaud, R.;
Georgantopoulos, I.;
Giles, P.;
Guennou, L.;
Guglielmo, V.;
Horellou, C.;
Husband, K.;
Huynh, M;
Iovino, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Koulouridis, E.;
Lavoie, S.;
Brun, A. M. C. Le;
Fevre, J. P. Le;
Lidman, C.;
Lieu, M.;
Lin, C. A.;
Mantz, A.;
Maughan, B. J.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCarthy, I. G.;
McGee, S.;
Melin, J. B.;
Melnyk, O.;
Menanteau, F.;
Novak, M.;
Paltani, S.;
Plionis, M.;
Poggianti, B. M.;
Pomarede, D.;
Pompei, E.;
Ponman, T. J.;
Ramos-Ceja, M. E.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rapetti, D.;
Raychaudury, S.;
Reiprich, T. H.;
Rottgering, H.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sadibekova, T.;
Santos, J.;
Sauvageot, J. L.;
Schimd, C.;
Sereno, M.;
Smith, G. P.;
Smolčić, V.;
Snowden, S.;
Spergel, D.;
Stanford, S.;
Surdej, J.;
Valageas, P.;
Valotti, A.;
Valtchanov, I.;
Vignali, C.;
Willis, J.;
Ziparo, F.
Submitted: 2015-12-14
We present the XXL Survey, the largest XMM programme totaling some 6.9 Ms to
date and involving an international consortium of roughly 100 members. The XXL
Survey covers two extragalactic areas of 25 deg2 each at a point-source
sensitivity of ~ 5E-15 erg/sec/cm2 in the [0.5-2] keV band (completeness
limit). The survey's main goals are to provide constraints on the dark energy
equation of state from the space-time distribution of clusters of galaxies and
to serve as a pathfinder for future, wide-area X-ray missions. We review
science objectives, including cluster studies, AGN evolution, and large-scale
structure, that are being conducted with the support of approximately 30
follow-up programmes. We describe the 542 XMM observations along with the
associated multi-lambda and numerical simulation programmes. We give a detailed
account of the X-ray processing steps and describe innovative tools being
developed for the cosmological analysis. The paper provides a thorough
evaluation of the X-ray data, including quality controls, photon statistics,
exposure and background maps, and sky coverage. Source catalogue construction
and multi-lambda associations are briefly described. This material will be the
basis for the calculation of the cluster and AGN selection functions, critical
elements of the cosmological and science analyses. The XXL multi-lambda data
set will have a unique lasting legacy value for cosmological and extragalactic
studies and will serve as a calibration resource for future dark energy studies
with clusters and other X-ray selected sources. With the present article, we
release the XMM XXL photon and smoothed images along with the corresponding
exposure maps. The XMM XXL observation list (Table B.1) is available in
electronic form at the CDS. The present paper is the first in a series
reporting results of the XXL-XMM survey.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.03857 [pdf] - 1326810
The XXL Survey IV. Mass-temperature relation of the bright cluster
sample
Lieu, Maggie;
Smith, Graham P.;
Giles, Paul A.;
Ziparo, Felicia;
Maughan, Ben J.;
Démoclès, Jessica;
Pacaud, Florian;
Pierre, Marguerite;
Adami, Christophe;
Bahé, Yannick M.;
Clerc, Nicolas;
Chiappetti, Lucio;
Eckert, Dominique;
Ettori, Stefano;
Lavoie, Sébastien;
Fevre, Jean-Paul Le;
McCarthy, Ian G.;
Kilbinger, Martin;
Ponman, Trevor J.;
Sadibekova, Tatyana;
Willis, Jon P.
Submitted: 2015-12-11
The XXL survey is the largest survey carried out by XMM-Newton. Covering an
area of 50deg$^2$, the survey contains $\sim450$ galaxy clusters out to a
redshift $\sim$2 and to an X-ray flux limit of
$\sim5\times10^{-15}erg\,s^{-1}cm^{-2}$. This paper is part of the first
release of XXL results focussed on the bright cluster sample. We investigate
the scaling relation between weak-lensing mass and X-ray temperature for the
brightest clusters in XXL. The scaling relation is used to estimate the mass of
all 100 clusters in XXL-100-GC. Based on a subsample of 38 objects that lie
within the intersection of the northern XXL field and the publicly available
CFHTLenS catalog, we derive the $M_{WL}$ of each system with careful
considerations of the systematics. The clusters lie at $0.1<z<0.6$ and span a
range of $ T\simeq1-5keV$. We combine our sample with 58 clusters from the
literature, increasing the range out to 10keV. To date, this is the largest
sample of clusters with $M_{WL}$ measurements that has been used to study the
mass-temperature relation. The fit ($M\propto T^b$) to the XXL clusters returns
a slope $b=1.78^{+0.37}_{-0.32}$ and intrinsic scatter $\sigma_{\ln
M|T}\simeq0.53$; the scatter is dominated by disturbed clusters. The fit to the
combined sample of 96 clusters is in tension with self-similarity,
$b=1.67\pm0.12$ and $\sigma_{\ln M|T}\simeq0.41$. Overall our results
demonstrate the feasibility of ground-based weak-lensing scaling relation
studies down to cool systems of $\sim1keV$ temperature and highlight that the
current data and samples are a limit to our statistical precision. As such we
are unable to determine whether the validity of hydrostatic equilibrium is a
function of halo mass. An enlarged sample of cool systems, deeper weak-lensing
data, and robust modelling of the selection function will help to explore these
issues further.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.4100 [pdf] - 1208415
The X-CLASS - redMaPPer galaxy cluster comparison: I. Identification
procedures
Submitted: 2014-03-17, last modified: 2014-09-17
We performed a detailed and, for a large part interactive, analysis of the
matching output between the X-CLASS and redMaPPer cluster catalogues. The
overlap between the two catalogues has been accurately determined and possible
cluster positional errors were manually recovered. The final samples comprise
270 and 355 redMaPPer and X-CLASS clusters respectively. X-ray cluster matching
rates were analysed as a function of optical richness. In a second step, the
redMaPPer clusters were correlated with the entire X-ray catalogue, containing
point and uncharacterised sources (down to a few 10^{-15} erg s^{-1} cm^{-2} in
the [0.5-2] keV band). A stacking analysis was performed for the remaining
undetected optical clusters. Main results show that neither of the wavebands
misses any massive cluster (as coded by X-ray luminosity or optical richness).
After correcting for obvious pipeline short-comings (about 10% of the cases
both in optical and X-ray), ~50% of the redMaPPer (down to a richness of 20)
are found to coincide with an X-CLASS cluster; when considering X-ray sources
of any type, this fraction increases to ~ 80%; for the remaining objects, the
stacking analysis finds a weak signal within 0.5 Mpc around the cluster optical
centers. The fraction of clusters totally dominated by AGN-type emission
appears to be of the order of a few percent. Conversely ~ 40% of the X-CLASS
clusters are identified with a redMaPPer (down to a richness of 20) - part of
the non-matches being due to the fact that the X-CLASS sample extends further
out than redMaPPer (z<1 vs z<0.6); extending the correlation down to a richness
of 5, raises the matching rate to ~ 65%.