Fedunin, E. Yu.
Normalized to: Fedunin, E.
2 article(s) in total. 12 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 4,5.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0703015 [pdf] - 89824
The use of the Cherenkov radiation and the fluorescence light to
calibrate the energy of giant air showers
Submitted: 2007-03-01
In terms of the quark-gluon string model the analysis of the classic
procedure to estimate the energy of giant air showers with help of the
parameter s(600) (a density of energy deposition in the scintillator at a
distance of 600 m from the shower core) have been carried out. Simulations of
the signal s(600) with help of the CORSIKA code in terms of the hybrid scheme
show energy estimates which are approximately a factor of 1.6 times lower than
adopted at the Yakutsk array. The energy estimates calculated with the help of
the Cherenkov radiation coincide with the experimental data. Simulations of
deposited energy distributions in the atmosphere with help of the GEANT4 code
and the CORSIKA code show that more than 20% of this energy may be deposited at
distances above 100 m from the shower axis.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601449 [pdf] - 79307
Upper limit on the ultra-high-energy photon flux from AGASA and Yakutsk
data
Rubtsov, G. I.;
Dedenko, L. G.;
Fedorova, G. F.;
Fedunin, E. Yu.;
Glushkov, A. V.;
Gorbunov, D. S.;
Makarov, I. T.;
Pravdin, M. I.;
Roganova, T. M.;
Sleptsov, I. E.;
Troitsky, S. V.
Submitted: 2006-01-19
We present the interpretation of the muon and scintillation signals of
ultra-high-energy air showers observed by AGASA and Yakutsk extensive air
shower array experiments. We consider case-by-case ten highest energy events
with known muon content and conclude that at the 95% confidence level (C.L.)
none of them was induced by a primary photon. Taking into account statistical
fluctuations and differences in the energy estimation of proton and photon
primaries, we derive an upper limit of 36% at 95% C.L. on the fraction of
primary photons in the cosmic-ray flux above 10^20 eV. This result disfavors
the Z-burst and superheavy dark-matter solutions to the GZK-cutoff problem.
