Normalized to: Fauvaud, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.02429 [pdf] - 1590882
Against the biases in spins and shapes of asteroids
Marciniak, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Urakawa, S.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Tychoniec, Ł.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Kamiński, K.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Nadolny, J.;
Nishiyama, K.;
Okumura, S.;
Polińska, M.;
Richard, F.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Stachowski, G.;
Trela, P.
Submitted: 2017-11-07
Physical studies of asteroids depend on an availability of lightcurve data.
Targets that are easy to observe and analyse naturally have more data
available, so their synodic periods are confirmed from multiple sources. Also,
thanks to availability of data from a number of apparitions, their spin and
shape models can often be obtained.
Almost half of bright (H<=11 mag) main-belt asteroid population with known
lightcurve parameters have rotation periods considered long (P>12 hours) and
are rarely chosen for photometric observations. There is a similar selection
effect against asteroids with low lightcurve amplitudes (a_max<=0.25 mag). As a
result such targets, though numerous in this brightness range, are
underrepresented in the sample of spin and shape modelled asteroids. In the
range of fainter targets such effects are stronger. These selection effects can
influence what is now known about asteroid spin vs. size distribution, on
asteroid internal structure and densities and on spatial orientation of
asteroid spin axes.
To reduce both biases at the same time, we started a photometric survey of a
substantial sample of those bright main-belt asteroids that displayed both
features: periods longer than 12 hours, and amplitudes that did not exceed 0.25
magnitude. First we aim at finding synodic periods of rotation, and after a few
observed apparitions, obtaining spin and shape models.
As an initial result of our survey we found that a quarter of the studied
sample (8 out of 34 targets) have rotation periods different from those widely
accepted. We publish here these newly found period values with the lightcurves.
The size/frequency plot might in reality look different in the long-period
range. Further studies of asteroid spins, shapes, and structure should take
into account serious biases that are present in the parameters available today.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07422 [pdf] - 1449873
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data
from a large collaboration network
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D. A.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Delbo', M.;
Adam, O.;
Afonina, V.;
Anquetin, R.;
Antonini, P.;
Arnold, L.;
Audejean, M.;
Aurard, P.;
Bachschmidt, M.;
Badue, B.;
Barbotin, E.;
Barroy, P.;
Baudouin, P.;
Berard, L.;
Berger, N.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Bosch, J-G.;
Bouley, S.;
Bozhinova, I.;
Brinsfield, J.;
Brunetto, L.;
Canaud, G.;
Caron, J.;
Carrier, F.;
Casalnuovo, G.;
Casulli, S.;
Cerda, M.;
Chalamet, L.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Chinaglia, B.;
Cikota, A.;
Colas, F.;
Coliac, J-F.;
Collet, A.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Conseil, E.;
Costa, R.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Debackere, A.;
Decock, A.;
Déhais, Q.;
Déléage, T.;
Delmelle, S.;
Demeautis, C.;
Dróżdż, M.;
Dubos, G.;
Dulcamara, T.;
Dumont, M.;
Durkee, R.;
Dymock, R.;
del Valle, A. Escalante;
Esseiva, N.;
Esseiva, R.;
Esteban, M.;
Fauchez, T.;
Fauerbach, M.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Forné, E.;
Fournel, C.;
Fradet, D.;
Garlitz, J.;
Gerteis, O.;
Gillier, C.;
Gillon, M.;
Giraud, R.;
Godard, J-P.;
Goncalves, R.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hay, K.;
Hellmich, S.;
Heterier, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Hodosan, G.;
Hren, M.;
Hygate, A.;
Innocent, N.;
Jacquinot, H.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jehin, E.;
Jerosimic, L.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, W.;
Korlevic, P.;
Kosturkiewicz, E.;
Krafft, P.;
Krugly, Y.;
Kugel, F.;
Labrevoir, O.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Lehký, M.;
Leroy, A.;
Lesquerbault, B.;
Lopez-Gonzales, M. J.;
Lutz, M.;
Mallecot, B.;
Manfroid, J.;
Manzini, F.;
Marciniak, A.;
Martin, A.;
Modave, B.;
Montaigut, R.;
Montier, J.;
Morelle, E.;
Morton, B.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Peyrot, A.;
Pilcher, F.;
Pirenne, J-F.;
Piron, P.;
Polinska, M.;
Polotto, M.;
Poncy, R.;
Previt, J. P.;
Reignier, F.;
Renauld, D.;
Ricci, D.;
Richard, F.;
Rinner, C.;
Risoldi, V.;
Robilliard, D.;
Romeuf, D.;
Rousseau, G.;
Roy, R.;
Ruthroff, J.;
Salom, P. A.;
Salvador, L.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Scholz, A.;
Séné, G.;
Skiff, B.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sogorb, P.;
Soldán, F.;
Spiridakis, A.;
Splanska, E.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stephens, R.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J-P.;
Tumolo, G.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Vanoutryve, B.;
Vugnon, J. M.;
Warner, B. D.;
Waucomont, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Winiarski, M.;
Wolf, M.
Submitted: 2015-10-26
Asteroid modeling efforts in the last decade resulted in a comprehensive
dataset of almost 400 convex shape models and their rotation states. This
amount already provided a deep insight into physical properties of main-belt
asteroids or large collisional families. We aim to increase the number of
asteroid shape models and rotation states. Such results are an important input
for various further studies such as analysis of asteroid physical properties in
different populations, including smaller collisional families, thermophysical
modeling, and scaling shape models by disk-resolved images, or stellar
occultation data. This provides, in combination with known masses, bulk density
estimates, but constrains also theoretical collisional and evolutional models
of the Solar System. We use all available disk-integrated optical data (i.e.,
classical dense-in-time photometry obtained from public databases and through a
large collaboration network as well as sparse-in-time individual measurements
from a few sky surveys) as an input for the convex inversion method, and derive
3D shape models of asteroids, together with their rotation periods and
orientations of rotation axes. The key ingredient is the support of more that
one hundred observers who submit their optical data to publicly available
databases. We present updated shape models for 36 asteroids, for which mass
estimates are currently available in the literature or their masses will be
most likely determined from their gravitational influence on smaller bodies,
which orbital deflection will be observed by the ESA Gaia astrometric mission.
This was achieved by using additional optical data from recent apparitions for
the shape optimization. Moreover, we also present new shape model
determinations for 250 asteroids, including 13 Hungarias and 3 near-Earth
asteroids.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.0872 [pdf] - 1222984
The small binary asteroid (939) Isberga
Carry, B.;
Matter, A.;
Scheirich, P.;
Pravec, P.;
Molnar, L.;
Mottola, S.;
Carbognani, A.;
Jehin, E.;
Marciniak, A.;
Binzel, R. P.;
DeMeo, F. E.;
Birlan, M.;
Delbo, M.;
Barbotin, E.;
Behrend, R.;
Bonnardeau, M.;
Colas, F.;
Farissier, P.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Gillier, C.;
Gillon, M.;
Hellmich, S.;
Hirsch, R.;
Leroy, A.;
Manfroid, J.;
Montier, J.;
Morelle, E.;
Richard, F.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Strajnic, J.;
Vachier, F.
Submitted: 2014-11-04
In understanding the composition and internal structure of asteroids, their
density is perhaps the most diagnostic quantity. We aim here to characterize
the surface composition, mutual orbit, size, mass, and density of the small
main-belt binary asteroid (939) Isberga. For that, we conduct a suite of
multi-technique observations, including optical lightcurves over many epochs,
near-infrared spectroscopy, and interferometry in the thermal infrared. We
develop a simple geometric model of binary systems to analyze the
interferometric data in combination with the results of the lightcurve
modeling. From spectroscopy, we classify Ibserga as a Sq-type asteroid,
consistent with the albedo of 0.14$^{+0.09}_{-0.06}$ (all uncertainties are
reported as 3-$\sigma$ range) we determine (average albedo of S-types is 0.197
$\pm$ 0.153, Pravec et al., 2012, Icarus 221, 365-387). Lightcurve analysis
reveals that the mutual orbit has a period of 26.6304 $\pm$ 0.0001 h, is close
to circular, and has pole coordinates within 7 deg. of (225, +86) in ECJ2000,
implying a low obliquity of 1.5 deg. The combined analysis of lightcurves and
interferometric data allows us to determine the dimension of the system and we
find volume-equivalent diameters of 12.4$^{+2.5}_{-1.2}$ km and
3.6$^{+0.7}_{-0.3}$ km for Isberga and its satellite, circling each other on a
33 km wide orbit. Their density is assumed equal and found to be
$2.91^{+1.72}_{-2.01}$ g.cm$^{-3}$, lower than that of the associated ordinary
chondrite meteorites, suggesting the presence of some macroporosity, but
typical of S-types of the same size range (Carry, 2012, P\&SS 73, 98-118). The
present study is the first direct measurement of the size of a small main-belt
binary. Although the interferometric observations of Isberga are at the edge of
MIDI capabilities, the method described here is applicable to others suites of
instruments (e.g, LBT, ALMA).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.6943 [pdf] - 620042
Asteroids' physical models from combined dense and sparse photometry and
scaling of the YORP effect by the observed obliquity distribution
Hanuš, J.;
Ďurech, J.;
Brož, M.;
Marciniak, A.;
Warner, B. D.;
Pilcher, F.;
Stephens, R.;
Behrend, R.;
Carry, B.;
Čapek, D.;
Antonini, P.;
Audejean, M.;
Augustesen, K.;
Barbotin, E.;
Baudouin, P.;
Bayol, A.;
Bernasconi, L.;
Borczyk, W.;
Bosch, J. -G.;
Brochard, E.;
Brunetto, L.;
Casulli, S.;
Cazenave, A.;
Charbonnel, S.;
Christophe, B.;
Colas, F.;
Coloma, J.;
Conjat, M.;
Cooney, W.;
Correira, H.;
Cotrez, V.;
Coupier, A.;
Crippa, R.;
Cristofanelli, M.;
Dalmas, Ch.;
Danavaro, C.;
Demeautis, C.;
Droege, T.;
Durkee, R.;
Esseiva, N.;
Esteban, M.;
Fagas, M.;
Farroni, G.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Del Freo, F.;
Garcia, L.;
Geier, S.;
Godon, C.;
Grangeon, K.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Hamanowa, H.;
Heck, N.;
Hellmich, S.;
Higgins, D.;
Hirsch, R.;
Husarik, M.;
Itkonen, T.;
Jade, O.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Klotz, A.;
Koff, R. A.;
Kryszczyńska, A.;
Kwiatkowski, T.;
Laffont, A.;
Leroy, A.;
Lecacheux, J.;
Leonie, Y.;
Leyrat, C.;
Manzini, F.;
Martin, A.;
Masi, G.;
Matter, D.;
Michałowski, J.;
Michałowski, M. J.;
Michałowski, T.;
Michelet, J.;
Michelsen, R.;
Morelle, E.;
Mottola, S.;
Naves, R.;
Nomen, J.;
Oey, J.;
Ogloza, W.;
Oksanen, A.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pääkkönen, P.;
Paiella, M.;
Pallares, H.;
Paulo, J.;
Pavic, M.;
Payet, B.;
Polińska, M.;
Polishook, D.;
Poncy, R.;
Revaz, Y.;
Rinner, C.;
Rocca, M.;
Roche, A.;
Romeuf, D.;
Roy, R.;
Saguin, H.;
Salom, P. A.;
Sanchez, S.;
Santacana, G.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sareyan, J. -P.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Sposetti, S.;
Starkey, D.;
Stoss, R.;
Strajnic, J.;
Teng, J. -P.;
Tregon, B.;
Vagnozzi, A.;
Velichko, F. P.;
Waelchli, N.;
Wagrez, K.;
Wücher, H.
Submitted: 2013-01-29
The larger number of models of asteroid shapes and their rotational states
derived by the lightcurve inversion give us better insight into both the nature
of individual objects and the whole asteroid population. With a larger
statistical sample we can study the physical properties of asteroid
populations, such as main-belt asteroids or individual asteroid families, in
more detail. Shape models can also be used in combination with other types of
observational data (IR, adaptive optics images, stellar occultations), e.g., to
determine sizes and thermal properties. We use all available photometric data
of asteroids to derive their physical models by the lightcurve inversion method
and compare the observed pole latitude distributions of all asteroids with
known convex shape models with the simulated pole latitude distributions. We
used classical dense photometric lightcurves from several sources and
sparse-in-time photometry from the U.S. Naval Observatory in Flagstaff,
Catalina Sky Survey, and La Palma surveys (IAU codes 689, 703, 950) in the
lightcurve inversion method to determine asteroid convex models and their
rotational states. We also extended a simple dynamical model for the spin
evolution of asteroids used in our previous paper. We present 119 new asteroid
models derived from combined dense and sparse-in-time photometry. We discuss
the reliability of asteroid shape models derived only from Catalina Sky Survey
data (IAU code 703) and present 20 such models. By using different values for a
scaling parameter cYORP (corresponds to the magnitude of the YORP momentum) in
the dynamical model for the spin evolution and by comparing synthetics and
observed pole-latitude distributions, we were able to constrain the typical
values of the cYORP parameter as between 0.05 and 0.6.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.2748 [pdf] - 1026347
The field high-amplitude SX Phe variable BL Cam: results from a
multisite photometric campaign. II. Evidence of a binary - possibly triple -
system
Fauvaud, S.;
Sareyan, J. -P.;
Ribas, I.;
Rodríguez, E.;
Lampens, P.;
Klingenberg, G.;
Farrell, J. A.;
Fumagalli, F.;
Simonetti, J. H.;
Wolf, M.;
Santacana, G.;
Zhou, A. -Y.;
Michel, R.;
Fox-Machado, L.;
Alvarez, M.;
Nava-Vega, A.;
López-González, M. J.;
Casanova, V. M.;
Aceituno, F. J.;
Scheggia, I.;
Rives, J. -J.;
Hintz, E. G.;
Van Cauteren, P.;
Helvaci, M.;
Yesilyaprak, C.;
Graham, K. A.;
Král, L.;
Kocián, R.;
Kučáková, H.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Granslo, B. H.;
Michelet, J.;
Nicholson, M. P.;
Vugnon, J. -M.;
Kotková, L.;
Truparová, K.;
Ulusoy, C.;
Yasarsoy, B.;
Avdibegovic, A.;
Blauzek, M.;
Kliner, J.;
Zasche, P.;
Bartošíková, S.;
Vilášek, M.;
Trondal, O.;
Abbeel, F. Van Den;
Behrend, R.;
Wücher, H.
Submitted: 2010-04-15
Short-period high-amplitude pulsating stars of Population I ($\delta$ Sct
stars) and II (SX Phe variables) exist in the lower part of the classical
(Cepheid) instability strip. Most of them have very simple pulsational
behaviours, only one or two radial modes being excited. Nevertheless, BL Cam is
a unique object among them, being an extreme metal-deficient field
high-amplitude SX Phe variable with a large number of frequencies. Based on a
frequency analysis, a pulsational interpretation was previously given. aims
heading (mandatory) We attempt to interpret the long-term behaviour of the
residuals that were not taken into account in the previous Observed-Calculated
(O-C) short-term analyses. methods heading (mandatory) An investigation of the
O-C times has been carried out, using a data set based on the previous
published times of light maxima, largely enriched by those obtained during an
intensive multisite photometric campaign of BL Cam lasting several months.
results heading (mandatory) In addition to a positive (161 $\pm$ 3) x 10$^{-9}$
yr$^{-1}$ secular relative increase in the main pulsation period of BL Cam, we
detected in the O-C data short- (144.2 d) and long-term ($\sim$ 3400 d)
variations, both incompatible with a scenario of stellar evolution. conclusions
heading (mandatory) Interpreted as a light travel-time effect, the short-term
O-C variation is indicative of a massive stellar component (0.46 to 1
M$_{\sun}$) with a short period orbit (144.2 d), within a distance of 0.7 AU
from the primary. More observations are needed to confirm the long-term O-C
variations: if they were also to be caused by a light travel-time effect, they
could be interpreted in terms of a third component, in this case probably a
brown dwarf star ($\geq$ 0.03 \ M$_{\sun}$), orbiting in $\sim$ 3400 d at a
distance of 4.5 AU from the primary.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.0631 [pdf] - 1002119
A Giant Crater on 90 Antiope?
Descamps, P.;
Marchis, F.;
Michalowski, T.;
Berthier, J.;
Pollock, J.;
Wiggins, P.;
Birlan, M.;
Colas, F.;
Vachier, F.;
Fauvaud, S.;
Fauvaud, M.;
Sareyan, J. -P.;
Pilcher, F.;
Klinglesmith, D. A.
Submitted: 2009-05-05
Mutual event observations between the two components of 90 Antiope were
carried out in 2007-2008. The pole position was refined to lambda0 =
199.5+/-0.5 eg and beta0 = 39.8+/-5 deg in J2000 ecliptic coordinates, leaving
intact the physical solution for the components, assimilated to two perfect
Roche ellipsoids, and derived after the 2005 mutual event season (Descamps et
al., 2007). Furthermore, a large-scale geological depression, located on one of
the components, was introduced to better match the observed lightcurves. This
vast geological feature of about 68 km in diameter, which could be postulated
as a bowl-shaped impact crater, is indeed responsible of the photometric
asymmetries seen on the "shoulders" of the lightcurves. The bulk density was
then recomputed to 1.28+/-0.04 gcm-3 to take into account this large-scale
non-convexity. This giant crater could be the aftermath of a tremendous
collision of a 100-km sized proto-Antiope with another Themis family member.
This statement is supported by the fact that Antiope is sufficiently porous
(~50%) to survive such an impact without being wholly destroyed. This violent
shock would have then imparted enough angular momentum for fissioning of
proto-Antiope into two equisized bodies. We calculated that the impactor must
have a diameter greater than ~17 km, for an impact velocity ranging between 1
and 4 km/s. With such a projectile, this event has a substantial 50%
probability to have occurred over the age of the Themis family.