sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Fatibene, L.

Normalized to: Fatibene, L.

4 article(s) in total. 9 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 3,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1807.00397  [pdf] - 2055310
Extended Cosmology in Palatini f(R)-theories
Comments: 24 pages, 14 figures
Submitted: 2018-07-01, last modified: 2020-02-26
We consider the cosmological models based on Palatini f(R)-theory for the function f(R)=aR-2bR^2-3c/R, which, when only dust visible matter is considered, is called dune cosmology in view of the shape of the function f(R(a)) (being a the scale factor). We discuss about the meaning of solving the model, and interpret it according to Ehlers-Pirani-Schild framework as defining a Weyl geometry on spacetime. Accordingly, we extend the definitions of luminosity distance, proper distance, and redshift to Weyl geometries and fit the values of parameters to SNIa data. Since the theoretical prediction is model-dependent, we argue that the it is affected by an extra choice, namely a model for atomic clocks, which, in principle, produces observable effects. To the best of our knowledge, these effects have not being considered in the literature before.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1712.03969  [pdf] - 2011837
Conformal gravity: light deflection revisited and the galactic rotation curve failure
Comments: 16 pages, 1 figure. Revised version according to the referees comments. The results reported in the original version remain unchanged
Submitted: 2017-12-11, last modified: 2019-12-10
We show how Conformal Gravity (CG) has to satisfy a fine-tuning condition to describe the rotation curves of disk galaxies without the aid of dark matter. Interpreting CG as a gauge natural theory yields conservation laws and their associated superpotentials without ambiguities. We consider the light deflection of a point-like lens and impose that the two Schwarzschild-like metrics with and without the lens are identical at infinite distances from the lens. The energy conservation law implies that the parameter $\gamma$ in the linear term of the metric has to vanish, otherwise the two metrics are physically inaccessible from each other. This linear term is responsible to mimic the role of dark matter in disk galaxies and gravitational lensing systems. Our analysis shows that removing the need of dark matter with CG thus relies on a fine-tuning condition on $\gamma$. We also illustrate why the results of previous investigations of gravitational lensing in CG largely disagree. These discrepancies derive from the erroneous use of the deflection angle definition adopted in General Relativity, where the vacuum solution is asymptotically flat, unlike CG. In addition, the lens mass is identified with various combinations of the metric parameters. However, these identifications are arbitrary, because the mass is not a conformally invariant quantity, unlike the conserved charge associated to the energy conservation law. Based on this conservation law and by removing the fine-tuning condition on $\gamma$, i.e. by setting $\gamma=0$, the energy difference between the metric with the point-like lens and the metric without it defines a conformally invariant quantity that can in principle be used for (1) a proper derivation of light deflection in CG, and (2) the identification of the lens mass with a function of the parameters $\beta$ and $k$ of the Schwarzschild-like metric.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1612.01535  [pdf] - 1580810
Strong gravitational lensing in $f\left(\chi\right)=\chi^{3/2}$ gravity
Comments: 16 pages, 3 figures, prepared for submission to JCAP; comments are welcome
Submitted: 2016-12-05
We discuss the phenomenology of gravitational lensing in the purely metric $f\left(\chi\right)$ gravity, an $f(R)$ gravity where the action of the gravitational field depends on the source mass. We focus on the strong lensing regime in galaxy-galaxy lens systems and in clusters of galaxies. Using an approximate metric solution accurate to second order of the velocity field $v/c$, we show how, in the $f\left(\chi\right)=\chi^{3/2}$ gravity, the same light deflection can be produced by point-like lenses with masses smaller than in General Relativity; this mass difference increases with increasing impact parameter and decreasing lens mass. However, for sufficiently massive point-like lenses and small impact parameters, $f\left(\chi\right)=\chi^{3/2}$ and GR yield indistinguishable light deflection angles: this regime occurs both in observed galaxy-galaxy lens systems and in the central regions of galaxy clusters. In the former systems, the GR and $f\left(\chi\right)$ masses are compatible with the mass of standard stellar populations and little or no dark matter, whereas, on the scales of the core of galaxy clusters, the presence of substantial dark matter is required both in General Relativity, and in our approximate $f\left(\chi\right)=\chi^{3/2}$ point-like lens solution. We thus conclude that our approximate metric solution of $f\left(\chi\right)=\chi^{3/2}$ is unable to describe the observed phenomenology of the strong lensing regime without the aid of dark matter.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1202.5699  [pdf] - 541794
The physical foundations for the geometric structure of relativistic theories of gravitation. From General Relativity to Extended Theories of Gravity through Ehlers-Pirani-Schild approach
Comments: 11 pages, 2 figures
Submitted: 2012-02-25
We discuss in a critical way the physical foundations of geometric structure of relativistic theories of gravity by the so-called Ehlers-Pirani-Schild formalism. This approach provides a natural interpretation of the observables showing how relate them to General Relativity and to a large class of Extended Theories of Gravity. In particular we show that, in such a formalism, geodesic and causal structures of space-time can be safely disentangled allowing a correct analysis in view of observations and experiment. As specific case, we take into account the case of f(R) gravity.