Normalized to: Farahi, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.16408 [pdf] - 2124999
PoPE: A population-based approach to model spatial structure of
astronomical systems
Submitted: 2020-06-29
We present a novel population-based Bayesian inference approach to model the
average and population variance of spatial distribution of a set of observables
from ensemble analysis of low signal-to-noise ratio measurements. The method
consists of (1) inferring the average profile using Gaussian Processes and (2)
computing the covariance of the profile observables given a set of independent
variables. Our model is computationally efficient and capable of inferring
average profiles of a large population size from noisy measurements, without
stacking and binning data nor parameterizing the shape of the mean profile. We
demonstrate the performance of our method using dark matter, gas and stellar
profiles extracted from hydrodynamical cosmological simulations of galaxy
formation. Population Profile Estimator (PoPE) is publicly available in a
GitHub repository. Our new method should be useful for measuring the spatial
distribution and internal structure of a variety of astrophysical systems using
large astronomical surveys.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.13231 [pdf] - 2121529
Approximate Bayesian Uncertainties on Deep Learning Dynamical Mass
Estimates of Galaxy Clusters
Submitted: 2020-06-23
We study methods for reconstructing Bayesian uncertainties on dynamical mass
estimates of galaxy clusters using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). We
discuss the statistical background of Bayesian Neural Networks and demonstrate
how variational inference techniques can be used to perform computationally
tractable posterior estimation for a variety of deep neural architectures. We
explore how various model designs and statistical assumptions impact prediction
accuracy and uncertainty reconstruction in the context of cluster mass
estimation. We measure the quality of our model posterior recovery using a mock
cluster observation catalog derived from the MultiDark simulation and
UniverseMachine catalog. We show that Bayesian CNNs produce highly accurate
dynamical cluster mass posteriors. These model posteriors are log-normal in
cluster mass and recover $68\%$ and $90\%$ confidence intervals to within $1\%$
of their measured value. We note how this rigorous modelling of dynamical mass
posteriors is necessary for using cluster abundance measurements to constrain
cosmological parameters.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.10162 [pdf] - 2117715
$\mu_{\star}$ Masses: Weak Lensing Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
Year 1 redMaPPer Clusters using Stellar Masses
Pereira, M. E. S.;
Palmese, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
McClintock, T.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Burgad, J.;
Annis, J.;
Farahi, A.;
Lin, H.;
Choi, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Esteves, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
MacCrann, N.;
Roodman, A.;
Sánchez, C.;
Shin, T.;
von der Linden, A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2020-06-17
We present the weak lensing mass calibration of the stellar mass based
$\mu_{\star}$ mass proxy for redMaPPer galaxy clusters in the Dark Energy
Survey Year 1. For the first time we are able to perform a calibration of
$\mu_{\star}$ at high redshifts, $z>0.33$. In a blinded analysis, we use $\sim
6,000$ clusters split into 12 subsets spanning the ranges $0.1 \leqslant
z<0.65$ and $\mu_{\star}$ up to $\sim 5.5 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}$, and infer
the average masses of these subsets through modelling of their stacked weak
lensing signal. In our model we account for the following sources of systematic
uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors, miscentring,
cluster-member contamination of the source sample, deviations from the NFW halo
profile, halo triaxiality and projection effects. We use the inferred masses to
estimate the joint mass--$\mu_{\star}$--$z$ scaling relation given by $\langle
M_{200c} | \mu_{\star},z \rangle = M_0 (\mu_{\star}/5.16\times 10^{12}
\mathrm{M_{\odot}})^{F_{\mu_{\star}}} ((1+z)/1.35)^{G_z}$. We find $M_0= (1.14
\pm 0.07) \times 10^{14} \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ with $F_{\mu_{\star}}= 0.76 \pm
0.06$ and $G_z= -1.14 \pm 0.37$. We discuss the use of $\mu_{\star}$ as a
complementary mass proxy to the well-studied richness $\lambda$ for: $i)$
exploring the regimes of low $z$, $\lambda<20$ and high $\lambda$, $z \sim 1$;
$ii)$ testing systematics such as projection effects for applications in
cluster cosmology.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.11124 [pdf] - 2055421
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster
Abundances and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, Tim;
Aguena, Michel;
Alarcon, Alex;
Allam, Sahar;
Allen, Steve;
Annis, James;
Avila, Santiago;
Bacon, David;
Bermeo, Alberto;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Bhargava, Sunayana;
Bocquet, Sebastian;
Brooks, David;
Brout, Dillon;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Burke, David;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Carretero, Jorge;
Castander, Francisco Javier;
Cawthon, Ross;
Chang, Chihway;
Chen, Xinyi;
Choi, Ami;
Costanzi, Matteo;
Crocce, Martin;
da Costa, Luiz;
Davis, Tamara;
De Vicente, Juan;
DeRose, Joseph;
Desai, Shantanu;
Diehl, H. Thomas;
Dietrich, Jörg;
Dodelson, Scott;
Doel, Peter;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Eckert, Kathleen;
Eifler, Tim;
Elvin-Poole, Jack;
Estrada, Juan;
Everett, Spencer;
Evrard, August;
Farahi, Arya;
Ferrero, Ismael;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gatti, Marco;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Gerdes, David;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Giles, Paul;
Grandis, Sebastian;
Gruen, Daniel;
Gruendl, Robert;
Gschwend, Julia;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Hartley, Will;
Hinton, Samuel;
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Hoyle, Ben;
Huterer, Dragan;
James, David;
Jarvis, Mike;
Jeltema, Tesla;
Johnson, Margaret;
Kent, Stephen;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Kron, Richard;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lahav, Ofer;
Li, Ting;
Lidman, Christopher;
Lima, Marcos;
Lin, Huan;
MacCrann, Niall;
Maia, Marcio;
Mantz, Adam;
Marshall, Jennifer;
Martini, Paul;
Mayers, Julian;
Melchior, Peter;
Mena, Juan;
Menanteau, Felipe;
Miquel, Ramon;
Mohr, Joe;
Nichol, Robert;
Nord, Brian;
Ogando, Ricardo;
Palmese, Antonella;
Paz-Chinchon, Francisco;
Malagón, Andrés Plazas;
Prat, Judit;
Rau, Markus Michael;
Romer, Kathy;
Roodman, Aaron;
Rooney, Philip;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Sako, Masao;
Samuroff, Simon;
Sanchez, Carles;
Saro, Alexandro;
Scarpine, Vic;
Schubnell, Michael;
Scolnic, Daniel;
Serrano, Santiago;
Sevilla, Ignacio;
Sheldon, Erin;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly;
Tarle, Gregory;
Thomas, Daniel;
To, Chun-Hao;
Troxel, Michael A.;
Tucker, Douglas;
Varga, Tamas Norbert;
von der Linden, Anja;
Walker, Alistair;
Wechsler, Risa;
Weller, Jochen;
Wilkinson, Reese;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Yanny, Brian;
Zhang, Zhuowen;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2020-02-25
We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of
redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset.
Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as
were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in
surprisingly low values for $S_8 =\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm
0.04$, driven by a low matter density parameter, $\Omega_{\rm
m}=0.179^{+0.031}_{-0.038}$, with $\sigma_8-\Omega_{\rm m}$ posteriors in
$2.4\sigma$ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in $5.6\sigma$ with the
Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding
changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with
other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact
that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations,
cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster
analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence
of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant
physics. Cross checks with X-ray and microwave data, as well as independent
constraints on the observable--mass relation from SZ selected clusters, suggest
that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather
than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness
threshold ($\lambda \ge 30$) significantly reduces the tension with other
probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by
our model.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.05639 [pdf] - 2042383
Aging Halos: Implications of the Magnitude Gap on Conditional Statistics
of Stellar and Gas Properties of Massive Halos
Submitted: 2020-01-15
Cold dark matter model predicts that the large-scale structure grows
hierarchically. Small dark matter halos form first. Then, they grow gradually
via continuous merger and accretion. These halos host the majority of baryonic
matter in the Universe in the form of hot gas and cold stellar phase.
Determining how baryons are partitioned into these phases requires detailed
modeling of galaxy formation and their assembly history. It is speculated that
formation time of the same mass halos might be correlated with their baryonic
content. To evaluate this hypothesis, we employ halos of mass above
$10^{14}\,M_{\odot}$ realized by TNG300 solution of the IllustrisTNG project.
Formation time is not directly observable. Hence, we rely on the magnitude gap
between the brightest and the fourth brightest halo galaxy member, which is
shown that traces formation time of the host halo. We compute the conditional
statistics of the stellar and gas content of halos conditioned on their total
mass and magnitude gap. We find a strong correlation between magnitude gap and
gas mass, BCG stellar mass, and satellite galaxies stellar mass, but not the
total stellar mass of halo. Conditioning on the magnitude gap can reduce the
scatter about halo property--halo mass relation and has a significant impact on
the conditional covariance. Reduction in the scatter can be as significant as
30%, which implies more accurate halo mass prediction. Incorporating the
magnitude gap has a potential to improve cosmological constraints using halo
abundance and allows us to gain insight into the baryon evolution within these
systems.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.02283 [pdf] - 2089065
Stellar Property Statistics of Massive Halos from Cosmological
Hydrodynamics Simulations: Common Kernel Shapes
Submitted: 2020-01-07
We study stellar property statistics, including satellite galaxy occupation,
of massive halo populations realized by three cosmological hydrodynamics
simulations: BAHAMAS + MACSIS, TNG300 of the IllustrisTNG suite, and Magneticum
Pathfinder. The simulations incorporate independent sub-grid methods for
astrophysical processes with spatial resolutions ranging from $1.5$ to $6$ kpc,
and each generates samples of $1000$ or more halos with $M_{\rm halo}>
10^{13.5} M_{\odot}$ at redshift $z=0$. Applying localized, linear regression
(LLR), we extract halo mass-conditioned statistics (normalizations, slopes, and
intrinsic covariance) for a three-element stellar property vector consisting
of: i) $N_{sat}$, the number of satellite galaxies with stellar mass,
$M_{\star, \rm sat} > 10^{10} M_{\odot}$ within radius $R_{200c}$ of the halo;
ii) $M_{\star,\rm tot}$, the total stellar mass within that radius, and; iii)
$M_{\star,\rm BCG}$, the gravitationally-bound stellar mass of the central
galaxy within a $100 \, \rm kpc$ radius. Scaling parameters for the three
properties with halo mass show mild differences among the simulations, in part
due to numerical resolution, but there is qualitative agreement on property
correlations, with halos having smaller than average central galaxies tending
to also have smaller total stellar mass and a larger number of satellite
galaxies. Marginalizing over total halo mass, we find the satellite galaxy
kernel, $p(\ln N_{sat}\,|\,M_{\rm halo},z)$ to be consistently skewed left,
with skewness parameter $\gamma = -0.91 \pm 0.02$, while that of $\ln
M_{\star,\rm tot}$ is closer to log-normal, in all three simulations. The
highest resolution simulations find $\gamma \simeq -0.8$ for the $z=0$ shape of
$p(\ln M_{\star,\rm BCG}\,|\,M_{\rm halo},z)$ and also that the fractional
scatter in total stellar mass is below $10\%$ in halos more massive than
$10^{14.3} M_{\odot}$.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.08813 [pdf] - 2057676
Stellar mass as a galaxy cluster mass proxy: application to the Dark
Energy Survey redMaPPer clusters
Palmese, A.;
Annis, J.;
Burgad, J.;
Farahi, A.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Welch, B.;
Pereira, M. da Silva;
Lin, H.;
Bhargava, S.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Wilkinson, R.;
Giles, P.;
Jeltema, T.;
Romer, A. K.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Hilton, M.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Bermeo, A.;
Mayers, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lahav, O.;
Leistedt, B.;
McClintock, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Varga, T. N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zhang, Y.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Collins, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Liddle, A.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mann, R. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Sahlen, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stott, J.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2019-03-20, last modified: 2019-11-18
We introduce a galaxy cluster mass observable, $\mu_\star$, based on the
stellar masses of cluster members, and we present results for the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Year 1 observations. Stellar masses are computed using a Bayesian
Model Averaging method, and are validated for DES data using simulations and
COSMOS data. We show that $\mu_\star$ works as a promising mass proxy by
comparing our predictions to X-ray measurements. We measure the X-ray
temperature-$\mu_\star$ relation for a total of 150 clusters matched between
the wide-field DES Year 1 redMaPPer catalogue, and Chandra and XMM archival
observations, spanning the redshift range $0.1<z<0.7$. For a scaling relation
which is linear in logarithmic space, we find a slope of $\alpha =
0.488\pm0.043$ and a scatter in the X-ray temperature at fixed $\mu_\star$ of
$\sigma_{{\rm ln} T_X|\mu_\star}=0.266^{+0.019}_{-0.020}$ for the joint sample.
By using the halo mass scaling relations of the X-ray temperature from the
Weighing the Giants program, we further derive the $\mu_\star$-conditioned
scatter in mass, finding $\sigma_{{\rm ln} M|\mu_\star}=0.26^{+ 0.15}_{-
0.10}$. These results are competitive with well-established cluster mass
proxies used for cosmological analyses, showing that $\mu_\star$ can be used as
a reliable and physically motivated mass proxy to derive cosmological
constraints.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05796 [pdf] - 1998604
Response to NITRD, NCO, NSF Request for Information on "Update to the
2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic
Plan"
Amundson, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avestruz, C.;
Bowring, D.;
Caldeira, J.;
Cerati, G.;
Chang, C.;
Dodelson, S.;
Elvira, D.;
Farahi, A.;
Genser, K.;
Gray, L.;
Gutsche, O.;
Harris, P.;
Kinney, J.;
Kowalkowski, J. B.;
Kutschke, R.;
Mrenna, S.;
Nord, B.;
Para, A.;
Pedro, K.;
Perdue, G. N.;
Scheinker, A.;
Spentzouris, P.;
John, J. St.;
Tran, N.;
Trivedi, S.;
Trouille, L.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Bom, C. R.
Submitted: 2019-11-04
We present a response to the 2018 Request for Information (RFI) from the
NITRD, NCO, NSF regarding the "Update to the 2016 National Artificial
Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan." Through this document,
we provide a response to the question of whether and how the National
Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (NAIRDSP)
should be updated from the perspective of Fermilab, America's premier national
laboratory for High Energy Physics (HEP). We believe the NAIRDSP should be
extended in light of the rapid pace of development and innovation in the field
of Artificial Intelligence (AI) since 2016, and present our recommendations
below. AI has profoundly impacted many areas of human life, promising to
dramatically reshape society --- e.g., economy, education, science --- in the
coming years. We are still early in this process. It is critical to invest now
in this technology to ensure it is safe and deployed ethically. Science and
society both have a strong need for accuracy, efficiency, transparency, and
accountability in algorithms, making investments in scientific AI particularly
valuable. Thus far the US has been a leader in AI technologies, and we believe
as a national Laboratory it is crucial to help maintain and extend this
leadership. Moreover, investments in AI will be important for maintaining US
leadership in the physical sciences.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.06637 [pdf] - 1971149
Chandra Follow-Up of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer Catalog Using the MATCha
Pipeline
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Jeltema, Tesla;
Chen, Xinyi;
Farahi, Arya;
Evrard, August;
Everett, Spencer;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Bernstein, Rebecca;
Bermeo, Alberto;
Eiger, Lena;
Giles, Paul;
Israel, Holger;
Michel, Renee;
Noorali, Raziq;
Romer, Kathy;
Rooney, Philip;
Splettstoesser, Megan
Submitted: 2018-08-20, last modified: 2019-08-13
In order to place constraints on cosmology through optical surveys of galaxy
clusters, one must first understand the properties of those clusters. To this
end, we introduce the Mass Analysis Tool for Chandra (MATCha), a pipeline which
uses a parallellized algorithm to analyze archival Chandra data. MATCha
simultaneously calculates X-ray temperatures and luminosities and performs
centering measurements for hundreds of potential galaxy clusters using archival
X-ray exposures. We run MATCha on the redMaPPer SDSS DR8 cluster catalog and
use MATCha's output X-ray temperatures and luminosities to analyze the galaxy
cluster temperature-richness, luminosity-richness, luminosity-temperature, and
temperature-luminosity scaling relations. We detect 447 clusters and determine
246 r2500 temperatures across all redshifts. Within 0.1 < z < 0.35 we find that
r2500 Tx scales with optical richness as ln(kB Tx / 1.0 keV) = (0.52 \pm 0.05)
ln({\lambda}/70) + (1.85 \pm 0.03) with intrinsic scatter of 0.27 \pm 0.02 (1
{\sigma}). We investigate the distribution of offsets between the X-ray center
and redMaPPer center within 0.1 < z < 0.35, finding that 68.3 \pm 6.5% of
clusters are well-centered. However, we find a broad tail of large offsets in
this distribution, and we explore some of the causes of redMaPPer miscentering.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.02502 [pdf] - 1910807
Detection of anti-correlation of hot and cold baryons in galaxy clusters
Farahi, Arya;
Mulroy, Sarah L.;
Evrard, August E.;
Smith, Graham P.;
Finoguenov, Alexis;
Bourdin, Herve;
Carlstrom, John E.;
Haines, Chris P.;
Marrone, Daniel P.;
Martino, Rossella;
Mazzotta, Pasquale;
O'Donnell, Christine;
Okabe, Nobuhiro
Submitted: 2019-07-04
The largest clusters of galaxies in the Universe contain vast amounts of dark
matter, plus baryonic matter in two principal phases, a majority hot gas
component and a minority cold stellar phase comprising stars, compact objects,
and low-temperature gas. Hydrodynamic simulations indicate that the
highest-mass systems retain the cosmic fraction of baryons, a natural
consequence of which is anti-correlation between the masses of hot gas and
stars within dark matter halos of fixed total mass. We report observational
detection of this anti-correlation based on 4 elements of a $9\times9$ element
covariance matrix for nine cluster properties, measured from X-ray, optical,
infrared and millimetre wavelength observations of 41 clusters from the Local
Cluster Substructure Survey. These clusters were selected using explicit and
quantitative selection rules that were then encoded in our hierarchical
Bayesian model. Our detection of anti-correlation is consistent with
predictions from contemporary hydrodynamic cosmological simulations that were
not tuned to reproduce this signal.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.07119 [pdf] - 1893322
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of Cluster Mis-centering
in the redMaPPer Catalogs
Zhang, Y.;
Jeltema, T.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Everett, S.;
Rozo, E.;
Farahi, A.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bhargava, S.;
Giles, P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Wilkinson, R.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Mantz, A.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Stern, C.;
Gruen, D.;
von der Linden, A.;
Splettstoesser, M.;
Chen, X.;
Costanzi, M.;
Allen, S.;
Collins, C.;
Hilton, M.;
Klein, M.;
Mann, R. G.;
Manolopoulou, M.;
Morris, G.;
Mayers, J.;
Sahlen, M.;
Stott, J.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2019-01-21, last modified: 2019-06-01
The center determination of a galaxy cluster from an optical cluster finding
algorithm can be offset from theoretical prescriptions or $N$-body definitions
of its host halo center. These offsets impact the recovered cluster statistics,
affecting both richness measurements and the weak lensing shear profile around
the clusters. This paper models the centering performance of the \RM~cluster
finding algorithm using archival X-ray observations of \RM-selected clusters.
Assuming the X-ray emission peaks as the fiducial halo centers, and through
analyzing their offsets to the \RM~centers, we find that $\sim 75\pm 8 \%$ of
the \RM~clusters are well centered and the mis-centered offset follows a Gamma
distribution in normalized, projected distance. These mis-centering offsets
cause a systematic underestimation of cluster richness relative to the
well-centered clusters, for which we propose a descriptive model. Our results
enable the DES Y1 cluster cosmology analysis by characterizing the necessary
corrections to both the weak lensing and richness abundance functions of the
DES Y1 redMaPPer cluster catalog.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.07189 [pdf] - 1888321
Percent-Level Test of Isotropic Expansion Using Type Ia Supernovae
Submitted: 2019-02-19, last modified: 2019-05-23
We propose and implement a novel, robust, and non-parametric test of
statistical isotropy of the expansion of the universe, and apply it to around
one thousand type Ia supernovae from the Pantheon sample. We calculate the
angular clustering of supernova magnitude residuals and compare it to the noise
expected under the isotropic assumption. We also test for systematic effects
and demonstrate that their effects are negligible or are already accounted for
in our procedure. We express our constraints as an upper limit on the rms
spatial variation in the Hubble parameter at late times. For the sky smoothed
with a Gaussian with fwhm=60 deg, less than 1% rms spatial variation in the
Hubble parameter is allowed at 99.7% confidence.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.00428 [pdf] - 1905780
Identification of RR Lyrae stars in multiband, sparsely-sampled data
from the Dark Energy Survey using template fitting and Random Forest
classification
Stringer, K. M.;
Long, J. P.;
Macri, L. M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Martínez-Vázquez, C. E.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Bechtol, K.;
Morganson, E.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Pace, A. B.;
Walker, A. R.;
Nielsen, C.;
Li, T. S.;
Rykoff, E.;
Burke, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Neilsen, E.;
Ferguson, P.;
Cantu, S. A.;
Myron, J. L.;
Strigari, L.;
Farahi, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Tucker, D.;
Lin, Z.;
Hatt, D.;
Maner, J. F.;
Plybon, L.;
Riley, A. H.;
Nadler, E. O.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Melchior, P.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Yanny, B.
Submitted: 2019-05-01
Many studies have shown that RR Lyrae variable stars (RRL) are powerful
stellar tracers of Galactic halo structure and satellite galaxies. The Dark
Energy Survey (DES), with its deep and wide coverage (g ~ 23.5 mag) in a single
exposure; over 5000 deg$^{2}$) provides a rich opportunity to search for
substructures out to the edge of the Milky Way halo. However, the sparse and
unevenly sampled multiband light curves from the DES wide-field survey (median
4 observations in each of grizY over the first three years) pose a challenge
for traditional techniques used to detect RRL. We present an empirically
motivated and computationally efficient template fitting method to identify
these variable stars using three years of DES data. When tested on DES light
curves of previously classified objects in SDSS stripe 82, our algorithm
recovers 89% of RRL periods to within 1% of their true value with 85% purity
and 76% completeness. Using this method, we identify 5783 RRL candidates, ~31%
of which are previously undiscovered. This method will be useful for
identifying RRL in other sparse multiband data sets.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.05494 [pdf] - 1871416
Gaia DR2 unravels incompleteness of nearby cluster population: New open
clusters in the direction of Perseus
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Sedaghat, N.;
Farahi, A.;
de Souza, R. S.;
Skalidis, R.;
Malz, A. I.;
Macêdo, S.;
Moews, B.;
Jordi, C.;
Moitinho, A.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Ishida, E. E. O.;
Heneka, C.;
Boucaud, A.;
Trindade, A. M. M.
Submitted: 2018-10-12, last modified: 2019-03-21
Open clusters (OCs) are popular tracers of the structure and evolutionary
history of the Galactic disk. The OC population is often considered to be
complete within 1.8 kpc of the Sun. The recent Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) allows
the latter claim to be challenged. We perform a systematic search for new OCs
in the direction of Perseus using precise and accurate astrometry from Gaia
DR2. We implement a coarse-to-fine search method. First, we exploit spatial
proximity using a fast density-aware partitioning of the sky via a k-d tree in
the spatial domain of Galactic coordinates, (l, b). Secondly, we employ a
Gaussian mixture model in the proper motion space to quickly tag fields around
OC candidates. Thirdly, we apply an unsupervised membership assignment method,
UPMASK, to scrutinise the candidates. We visually inspect colour-magnitude
diagrams to validate the detected objects. Finally, we perform a diagnostic to
quantify the significance of each identified overdensity in proper motion and
in parallax space We report the discovery of 41 new stellar clusters. This
represents an increment of at least 20% of the previously known OC population
in this volume of the Milky Way. We also report on the clear identification of
NGC 886, an object previously considered an asterism. This letter challenges
the previous claim of a near-complete sample of open clusters up to 1.8 kpc.
Our results reveal that this claim requires revision, and a complete census of
nearby open clusters is yet to be found.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.08042 [pdf] - 1971206
Mass Variance from Archival X-ray Properties of Dark Energy Survey
Year-1 Galaxy Clusters
Farahi, A.;
Chen, X.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Wilkinson, R.;
Bhargava, S.;
Giles, P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Jeltema, T.;
Hilton, M.;
Bermeo, A.;
Mayers, J.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Collins, C.;
Costanzi, M.;
Everett, S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantz, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Sahlen, M.;
Stott, J.;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Zhang, Y.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-03-19
Using archival X-ray observations and a log-normal population model, we
estimate constraints on the intrinsic scatter in halo mass at fixed optical
richness for a galaxy cluster sample identified in Dark Energy Survey Year-One
(DES-Y1) data with the redMaPPer algorithm. We examine the scaling behavior of
X-ray temperatures, $T_X$, with optical richness, $\lambda_{RM}$, for clusters
in the redshift range $0.2<z<0.7$. X-ray temperatures are obtained from Chandra
and XMM observations for 58 and 110 redMaPPer systems, respectively. Despite
non-uniform sky coverage, the $T_X$ measurements are $> 50\%$ complete for
clusters with $\lambda_{RM} > 130$. Regression analysis on the two samples
produces consistent posterior scaling parameters, from which we derive a
combined constraint on the residual scatter, $\sigma_{\ln Tx | \lambda} = 0.275
\pm 0.019$. Joined with constraints for $T_X$ scaling with halo mass from the
Weighing the Giants program and richness--temperature covariance estimates from
the LoCuSS sample, we derive the richness-conditioned scatter in mass,
$\sigma_{\ln M | \lambda} = 0.30 \pm 0.04\, _{({\rm stat})} \pm 0.09\, _{({\rm
sys})}$, at an optical richness of approximately 70. Uncertainties in external
parameters, particularly the slope and variance of the $T_X$--mass relation and
the covariance of $T_X$ and $\lambda_{RM}$ at fixed mass, dominate the
systematic error. The $95\%$ confidence region from joint sample analysis is
relatively broad, $\sigma_{\ln M | \lambda} \in [0.14, \, 0.55]$, or a factor
ten in variance.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.04425 [pdf] - 1846071
Dark Matter Science in the Era of LSST
Bechtol, Keith;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Abazajian, Kevork N.;
Abidi, Muntazir;
Adhikari, Susmita;
Ali-Haïmoud, Yacine;
Annis, James;
Ansarinejad, Behzad;
Armstrong, Robert;
Asorey, Jacobo;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Banerjee, Arka;
Banik, Nilanjan;
Bennett, Charles;
Beutler, Florian;
Bird, Simeon;
Birrer, Simon;
Biswas, Rahul;
Biviano, Andrea;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Boddy, Kimberly K.;
Bonaca, Ana;
Borrill, Julian;
Bose, Sownak;
Bovy, Jo;
Frye, Brenda;
Brooks, Alyson M.;
Buckley, Matthew R.;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Bulbul, Esra;
Burchat, Patricia R.;
Burgess, Cliff;
Calore, Francesca;
Caputo, Regina;
Castorina, Emanuele;
Chang, Chihway;
Chapline, George;
Charles, Eric;
Chen, Xingang;
Clowe, Douglas;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Comparat, Johan;
Croft, Rupert A. C.;
Cuoco, Alessandro;
Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan;
D'Amico, Guido;
Davis, Tamara M;
Dawson, William A.;
de la Macorra, Axel;
Di Valentino, Eleonora;
Rivero, Ana Díaz;
Digel, Seth;
Dodelson, Scott;
Doré, Olivier;
Dvorkin, Cora;
Eckner, Christopher;
Ellison, John;
Erkal, Denis;
Farahi, Arya;
Fassnacht, Christopher D.;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Foreman, Simon;
Friedrich, Oliver;
Frieman, Joshua;
García-Bellido, Juan;
Gawiser, Eric;
Gerbino, Martina;
Giannotti, Maurizio;
Gill, Mandeep S. S.;
Gluscevic, Vera;
Golovich, Nathan;
Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A;
González-Morales, Alma X.;
Grin, Daniel;
Gruen, Daniel;
Hearin, Andrew P.;
Hendel, David;
Hezaveh, Yashar D.;
Hirata, Christopher M.;
Hložek, Renee;
Horiuchi, Shunsaku;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jee, M. James;
Jeltema, Tesla E.;
Kamionkowski, Marc;
Kaplinghat, Manoj;
Keeley, Ryan E.;
Keeton, Charles R.;
Khatri, Rishi;
Koposov, Sergey E.;
Koushiappas, Savvas M.;
Kovetz, Ely D.;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lam, Casey;
Lee, Chien-Hsiu;
Li, Ting S.;
Liguori, Michele;
Lin, Tongyan;
Lisanti, Mariangela;
LoVerde, Marilena;
Lu, Jessica R.;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Mao, Yao-Yuan;
McDermott, Samuel D.;
McNanna, Mitch;
Medford, Michael;
Meerburg, P. Daniel;
Meyer, Manuel;
Mirbabayi, Mehrdad;
Mishra-Sharma, Siddharth;
Marc, Moniez;
More, Surhud;
Moustakas, John;
Muñoz, Julian B.;
Murgia, Simona;
Myers, Adam D.;
Nadler, Ethan O.;
Necib, Lina;
Newburgh, Laura;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Nord, Brian;
Nourbakhsh, Erfan;
Nuss, Eric;
O'Connor, Paul;
Pace, Andrew B.;
Padmanabhan, Hamsa;
Palmese, Antonella;
Peiris, Hiranya V.;
Peter, Annika H. G.;
Piacentni, Francesco;
Piacentini, Francesco;
Plazas, Andrés;
Polin, Daniel A.;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Prescod-Weinstein, Chanda;
Read, Justin I.;
Ritz, Steven;
Robertson, Brant E.;
Rose, Benjamin;
Rosenfeld, Rogerio;
Rossi, Graziano;
Samushia, Lado;
Sánchez, Javier;
Sánchez-Conde, Miguel A.;
Schaan, Emmanuel;
Sehgal, Neelima;
Senatore, Leonardo;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Shafieloo, Arman;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Shipp, Nora;
Simon, Joshua D.;
Simon, Sara;
Slatyer, Tracy R.;
Slosar, Anže;
Sridhar, Srivatsan;
Stebbins, Albert;
Straniero, Oscar;
Strigari, Louis E.;
Tait, Tim M. P.;
Tollerud, Erik;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Uhlemann, Cora;
Urenña-López, L. Arturo;
Verma, Aprajita;
Vilalta, Ricardo;
Walter, Christopher W.;
Wang, Mei-Yu;
Watson, Scott;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Wittman, David;
Xu, Weishuang;
Yanny, Brian;
Young, Sam;
Yu, Hai-Bo;
Zaharijas, Gabrijela;
Zentner, Andrew R.;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2019-03-11
Astrophysical observations currently provide the only robust, empirical
measurements of dark matter. In the coming decade, astrophysical observations
will guide other experimental efforts, while simultaneously probing unique
regions of dark matter parameter space. This white paper summarizes
astrophysical observations that can constrain the fundamental physics of dark
matter in the era of LSST. We describe how astrophysical observations will
inform our understanding of the fundamental properties of dark matter, such as
particle mass, self-interaction strength, non-gravitational interactions with
the Standard Model, and compact object abundances. Additionally, we highlight
theoretical work and experimental/observational facilities that will complement
LSST to strengthen our understanding of the fundamental characteristics of dark
matter.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.10159 [pdf] - 1840221
The Role of Machine Learning in the Next Decade of Cosmology
Ntampaka, Michelle;
Avestruz, Camille;
Boada, Steven;
Caldeira, Joao;
Cisewski-Kehe, Jessi;
Di Stefano, Rosanne;
Dvorkin, Cora;
Evrard, August E.;
Farahi, Arya;
Finkbeiner, Doug;
Genel, Shy;
Goodman, Alyssa;
Goulding, Andy;
Ho, Shirley;
Kosowsky, Arthur;
La Plante, Paul;
Lanusse, Francois;
Lochner, Michelle;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Nagai, Daisuke;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Nord, Brian;
Peek, J. E. G.;
Peel, Austin;
Poczos, Barnabas;
Rau, Markus Michael;
Siemiginowska, Aneta;
Sutherland, Dougal J.;
Trac, Hy;
Wandelt, Benjamin
Submitted: 2019-02-26
In recent years, machine learning (ML) methods have remarkably improved how
cosmologists can interpret data. The next decade will bring new opportunities
for data-driven cosmological discovery, but will also present new challenges
for adopting ML methodologies and understanding the results. ML could transform
our field, but this transformation will require the astronomy community to both
foster and promote interdisciplinary research endeavors.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.05950 [pdf] - 2025399
A Robust and Efficient Deep Learning Method for Dynamical Mass
Measurements of Galaxy Clusters
Submitted: 2019-02-15
We demonstrate the ability of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to
mitigate systematics in the virial scaling relation and produce dynamical mass
estimates of galaxy clusters with remarkably low bias and scatter. We present
two models, CNN$_\text{1D}$ and CNN$_\text{2D}$, which leverage this deep
learning tool to infer cluster masses from distributions of member galaxy
dynamics. Our first model, CNN$_\text{1D}$, infers cluster mass directly from
the distribution of member galaxy line-of-sight velocities. Our second model,
CNN$_\text{2D}$, extends the input space of CNN$_\text{1D}$ to learn on the
joint distribution of galaxy line-of-sight velocities and projected radial
distances. We train each model as a regression over cluster mass using a
labeled catalog of realistic mock cluster observations generated from the
MultiDark simulation and UniverseMachine catalog. We then evaluate the
performance of each model on an independent set of mock observations selected
from the same simulated catalog. The CNN models produce cluster mass
predictions with log-normal residuals of scatter as low as $0.127$ dex, a
factor of three improvement over the classical M-$\sigma$ power law estimator.
Furthermore, the CNN model reduces prediction scatter relative to similar
machine learning approaches by up to $20\%$ while executing in drastically
shorter training and evaluation times (by a factor of 30) and producing
considerably more robust mass predictions (improving prediction stability under
variations in galaxy sampling rate by $53\%$).
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.11276 [pdf] - 1825004
LoCuSS: Scaling relations between galaxy cluster mass, gas, and stellar
content
Mulroy, Sarah L.;
Farahi, Arya;
Evrard, August E.;
Smith, Graham P.;
Finoguenov, Alexis;
O'Donnell, Christine;
Marrone, Daniel P.;
Abdulla, Zubair;
Bourdin, Hervé;
Carlstrom, John E.;
Démoclès, Jessica;
Haines, Chris P.;
Martino, Rossella;
Mazzotta, Pasquale;
McGee, Sean L.;
Okabe, Nobuhiro
Submitted: 2019-01-31
We present a simultaneous analysis of galaxy cluster scaling relations
between weak-lensing mass and multiple cluster observables, across a wide range
of wavelengths, that probe both gas and stellar content. Our new hierarchical
Bayesian model simultaneously considers the selection variable alongside all
other observables in order to explicitly model intrinsic property covariance
and account for selection effects. We apply this method to a sample of 41
clusters at $0.15<z<0.30$, with a well-defined selection criteria based on RASS
X-ray luminosity, and observations from Chandra / XMM, SZA, Planck, UKIRT, SDSS
and Subaru. These clusters have well-constrained weak-lensing mass measurements
based on Subaru / Suprime-Cam observations, which serve as the reference masses
in our model. We present 30 scaling relation parameters for 10 properties. All
relations probing the intracluster gas are slightly shallower than self-similar
predictions, in moderate tension with prior measurements, and the stellar
fraction decreases with mass. K-band luminosity has the lowest intrinsic
scatter with a 95th percentile of 0.16, while the lowest scatter gas probe is
gas mass with a fractional intrinsic scatter of $0.16 \pm 0.03$. We find no
distinction between the core-excised X-ray or high-resolution
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich relations of clusters of different central entropy, but find
with modest significance that higher entropy clusters have higher stellar
fractions than their lower entropy counterparts. We also report posterior mass
estimates from our likelihood model.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.09456 [pdf] - 1996667
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methods for Cluster Cosmology and
Application to the SDSS
Costanzi, M.;
Rozo, E.;
Simet, M.;
Zhang, Y.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Mantz, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Jeltema, T.;
Gruen, D.;
McClintock, S. Allen T.;
Romer, A. K.;
von der Linden, A.;
Farahi, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Giles, P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Bhargava, S.;
Bermeo-Hernandez, A.;
Chen, X.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2018-10-22
We perform the first blind analysis of cluster abundance data. Specifically,
we derive cosmological constraints from the abundance and weak-lensing signal
of \redmapper\ clusters of richness $\lambda\geq 20$ in the redshift range
$z\in[0.1,0.3]$ as measured in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We
simultaneously fit for cosmological parameters and the richness--mass relation
of the clusters. For a flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model with massive
neutrinos, we find $S_8 \equiv
\sigma_{8}(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}=0.79^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$. This value is both
consistent and competitive with that derived from cluster catalogues selected
in different wavelengths. Our result is also consistent with the combined
probes analyses by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Kilo-Degree Survey
(KiDS), and with the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies as measured
by \planck. We demonstrate that the cosmological posteriors are robust against
variation of the richness--mass relation model and to systematics associated
with the calibration of the selection function. In combination with Baryon
Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) data, we
constrain the Hubble rate to be $h=0.66\pm 0.02$, independent of the CMB.
Future work aimed at improving our understanding of the scatter of the
richness--mass relation has the potential to significantly improve the
precision of our cosmological posteriors. The methods described in this work
were developed for use in the forthcoming analysis of cluster abundances in the
DES. Our SDSS analysis constitutes the first part of a staged-unblinding
analysis of the full DES data set.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00039 [pdf] - 1767415
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of
redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Shin, T.;
Melchior, P.;
DeRose, J.;
Seitz, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
von der Linden, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Mantz, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Allen, S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bhargava, S.;
Costanzi, M.;
Everett, S.;
Farahi, A.;
Hamaus, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Hoyle, B.;
Israel, H.;
Li, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Morris, G.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pollina, G.;
Rau, M. M.;
Simet, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-30, last modified: 2018-09-12
We constrain the mass--richness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}|\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=-0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semi-analytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halo--mass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07072 [pdf] - 1767527
Modeling projection effects in optically-selected cluster catalogues
Costanzi, M.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Farahi, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Mantz, A.;
Gruen, D.;
Mandelbaum, R.;
DeRose, J.;
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Zhang, Y.;
Weller, J.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Aguena, M.
Submitted: 2018-07-18
The cosmological utility of galaxy cluster catalogues is primarily limited by
our ability to calibrate the relation between halo mass and observable mass
proxies such as cluster richness, X-ray luminosity or the Sunyaev-Zeldovich
signal. Projection effects are a particularly pernicious systematic effect that
can impact observable mass proxies; structure along the line of sight can both
bias and increase the scatter of the observable mass proxies used in cluster
abundance studies. In this work, we develop an empirical method to characterize
the impact of projection effects on redMaPPer cluster catalogues. We use
numerical simulations to validate our method and illustrate its robustness. We
demonstrate that modeling of projection effects is a necessary component for
cluster abundance studies capable of reaching $\approx 5\%$ mass calibration
uncertainties (e.g. the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 sample). Specifically,
ignoring the impact of projection effects in the observable--mass relation ---
i.e. marginalizing over a log-normal model only --- biases the posterior of the
cluster normalization condition $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm
m}/0.3)^{1/2}$ by $\Delta S_8 =0.05$, more than twice the uncertainty in the
posterior for such an analysis.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.01569 [pdf] - 1701513
The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys: IV. Testing ASpiX
with template-based cosmological simulations
Submitted: 2017-10-04, last modified: 2018-02-05
Following extensive tests on analytical toy-catalogues (paper III), we
present the results of a more realistic study over a 711 deg2 template-based
cosmological simulation. Dark matter halos from the Aardvark simulation have
been ascribed luminosities, temperatures and core-radii, using local scaling
relations and assuming self-similar evolution. Predicted X-ray sky-maps are
converted into XMM event lists using an instrumental simulator. The XXL
pipeline run on the resulting sky images, produces an 'observed' cluster
catalogue over which the tests have been performed. This allowed us to
investigate the relative power of various combinations of count-rate,
hardness-ratio, apparent-size and redshift information. Two fitting methods
were used : a traditional MCMC approach and a simple minimisation procedure
(Amoeba) whose mean uncertainties are a posteriori evaluated by means of
synthetic catalogues. Results were analysed and compared to the predictions
from a Fisher analysis (FA). For this particular catalogue realisation,
assuming perfectly known scaling relations, the CR-HR combination gives
$\sigma_8$ and $\Omega_m$ at the 10% level, while CR-HR-r$_c$-z improves this
to $\leq$ 3%. Adding a second hardness ratio improves results from the
CR-HR1-r$_c$ combination, but to a lesser extent than adding redshift
information. When all coefficients of the M-T relation (including scatter) are
also fitted, cosmological parameters are constrained to within 5-10%, and
larger for the M-T coefficients (up to a factor of two for the scatter). Errors
returned by the MCMC, by Amoeba, and by FA predictions, are in most cases in
excellent agreement and always within a factor of two. We also study the impact
of the scatter of the M-Rc relation on the number of detected clusters: for the
cluster typical sizes usually assumed, the larger the scatter, the lower the
number of detected objects.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.07066 [pdf] - 1789392
The XXL Survey: XXIII. The Mass Scale of XXL Clusters from Ensemble
Spectroscopy
Farahi, A.;
Guglielmo, V.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Poggianti, B. M.;
Adami, C.;
Ettori, S.;
Gastaldello, F.;
Giles, P. A.;
Maughan, B. J.;
Rapetti, D.;
Sereno, M.;
Altieri, B.;
Baldry, I.;
Birkinshaw, M.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Brown, M.;
Chiappetti, L.;
Driver, S. P.;
Elyiv, A.;
Garilli, B.;
Guennou, L.;
Hopkins, A.;
Iovino, A.;
Koulouridis, E.;
Liske, J.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Owers, M.;
Pacaud, F.;
Pierre, M.;
Plionis, M.;
Ponman, T.;
Robotham, A.;
Sadibekova, T.;
Scodeggio, M.;
Tuffs, R.;
Valtchanov, I.
Submitted: 2017-11-19
An X-ray survey with the XMM-Newton telescope, XMM-XXL, has identified
hundreds of galaxy groups and clusters in two 25 deg$^2$ fields. Combining
spectroscopic and X-ray observations in one field, we determine how the kinetic
energy of galaxies scales with hot gas temperature and also, by imposing prior
constraints on the relative energies of galaxies and dark matter, infer a
power-law scaling of total mass with temperature. Our goals are: i) to
determine parameters of the scaling between galaxy velocity dispersion and
X-ray temperature, $T_{\rm 300kpc}$, for the halos hosting XXL-selected
clusters, and; ii) to infer the log-mean scaling of total halo mass with
temperature, $\langle \ln M_{200} \, | \, T, z \rangle$. We apply an ensemble
velocity likelihood to a sample of $> 1500$ spectroscopic redshifts within
$132$ spectroscopically confirmed clusters with redshifts $z < 0.6$ to model,
$\langle \ln \sigma_{\rm gal}\,|\,T,z\rangle$, where $\sigma_{\rm gal}$ is the
velocity dispersion of XXL cluster member galaxies and $T$ is a 300 kpc
aperture temperature. To infer total halo mass we use a precise virial relation
for massive halos calibrated by N-body simulations along with a single degree
of freedom summarizing galaxy velocity bias with respect to dark matter. For
the XXL-N cluster sample, we find $\sigma_{\rm gal} \propto T^{0.63\pm0.05}$, a
slope significantly steeper than the self-similar expectation of $0.5$.
Assuming scale-independent galaxy velocity bias, we infer a mean logarithmic
mass at a given X-ray temperature and redshift, $\langle\ln (E(z)
M_{200}/10^{14}\,{\rm M}_{\odot})|T,z\rangle=\pi+\alpha \ln(T/T_p )+\beta\ln
(E(z)/E(z_p) )$ using pivot values ${\rm k}T_{p}=2.2\,{\rm keV}$ and
$z_p=0.25$, with normalization $\pi=0.45\pm0.24$ and slope
$\alpha=1.89\pm0.15$. We obtain only weak constraints on redshift evolution,
$\beta=-1.29\pm1.14$.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.04922 [pdf] - 1682494
Localized massive halo properties in Bahamas and Macsis simulations:
scalings, log-normality, and covariance
Submitted: 2017-11-13
Using tens of thousands of halos realized in the BAHAMAS and MACSIS
simulations produced with a consistent astrophysics treatment that includes AGN
feedback, we validate a multi-property statistical model for the stellar and
hot gas mass behavior in halos hosting groups and clusters of galaxies. The
large sample size allows us to extract fine-scale mass--property relations
(MPRs) by performing local linear regression (LLR) on individual halo stellar
mass (${\rm M}_{\rm star}$) and hot gas mass (${\rm M}_{\rm gas}$) as a
function of total halo mass (${\rm M}_{\rm halo}$). We find that: 1) both the
local slope and variance of the MPRs run with mass (primarily) and redshift
(secondarily); 2) the conditional likelihood, $p({\rm M}_{\rm star},\ {\rm
M}_{\rm gas} | \ {\rm M}_{\rm halo}, z)$ is accurately described by a
multivariate, log-normal distribution, and; 3) the covariance of ${\rm M}_{\rm
star}$ and ${\rm M}_{\rm gas}$ at fixed ${\rm M}_{\rm halo}$ is generally
negative, reflecting a partially closed baryon box model for high mass halos.
We validate the analytical population model of Evrard et al. (2014), finding
sub-percent accuracy in the log-mean halo mass selected at fixed property,
$\langle \ln {\rm M}_{\rm halo} | {\rm M}_{\rm gas} \rangle$ or $\langle \ln
{\rm M}_{\rm halo} | {\rm M}_{\rm star} \rangle$, when scale-dependent MPR
parameters are employed. This work highlights the potential importance of
allowing for running in the slope and scatter of MPRs when modeling cluster
counts for cosmological studies. We tabulate LLR fit parameters as a function
of halo mass at $z=0$, $0.5$ and 1 for two popular mass conventions.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.01781 [pdf] - 1580346
The XXL survey: first results and future
Pierre, M.;
Adami, C.;
Birkinshaw, M.;
Chiappetti, L.;
Ettori, S.;
Evrard, A.;
Faccioli, L.;
Gastaldello, F.;
Giles, P.;
Horellou, C.;
Iovino, A.;
Koulouridis, E.;
Lidman, C.;
Brun, A. Le;
Maughan, B.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCarthy, I.;
Miyazaki, S.;
Pacaud, F.;
Paltani, S.;
Plionis, M.;
Reiprich, T.;
Sadibekova, T.;
Smolcic, V.;
Snowden, S.;
Surdej, J.;
Tsirou, M.;
Vignali, C.;
Willis, J.;
Alis, S.;
Altieri, B.;
Baran, N.;
Benoist, C.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Bremer, M.;
Butler, A.;
Cappi, A.;
Caretta, C.;
Ciliegi, P.;
Clerc, N.;
Corasaniti, P. S.;
Coupon, J.;
Delhaize, J.;
Delvecchio, I.;
Democles, J.;
Desai, Sh.;
Devriendt, J.;
Dubois, Y.;
Eckert, D.;
Elyiv, A.;
Farahi, A.;
Ferrari, C.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Forman, W.;
Georgantopoulos, I.;
Guglielmo, V.;
Huynh, M.;
Jerlin, N.;
Jones, Ch.;
Lavoie, S.;
Fevre, J. -P. Le;
Lieu, M.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Marulli, F.;
Mantz, A.;
McGee, S.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Melnyk, O.;
Moscardini, L.;
Novak, M.;
Piconcelli, E.;
Poggianti, B.;
Pomarede, D.;
Pompei, E.;
Ponman, T.;
Ceja, M. E. Ramos;
Ranalli, P.;
Rapetti, D.;
Raychaudhury, S.;
Ricci, M.;
Rottgering, H.;
Sahlén, M.;
Sauvageot, J. -L.;
Schimd, C.;
Sereno, M.;
Smith, G. P.;
Umetsu, K.;
Valageas, P.;
Valotti, A.;
Valtchanov, I.;
Veropalumbo, A.;
Ascaso, B.;
Barnes, D.;
De Petris, M.;
Durret, F.;
Donahue, M.;
Ithana, M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Johnston-Hollitt, M.;
Kalfountzou, E.;
Kay, S.;
La Franca, F.;
Okabe, N.;
Muzzin, A.;
Rettura, A.;
Ricci, F.;
Ridl, J.;
Risaliti, G.;
Takizawa, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Truong, N.
Submitted: 2016-10-06, last modified: 2017-07-11
The XXL survey currently covers two 25 sq. deg. patches with XMM observations
of ~10ks. We summarise the scientific results associated with the first release
of the XXL data set, that occurred mid 2016. We review several arguments for
increasing the survey depth to 40 ks during the next decade of XMM operations.
X-ray (z<2) cluster, (z<4) AGN and cosmic background survey science will then
benefit from an extraordinary data reservoir. This, combined with deep
multi-$\lambda$ observations, will lead to solid standalone cosmological
constraints and provide a wealth of information on the formation and evolution
of AGN, clusters and the X-ray background. In particular, it will offer a
unique opportunity to pinpoint the z>1 cluster density. It will eventually
constitute a reference study and an ideal calibration field for the upcoming
eROSITA and Euclid missions.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.00037 [pdf] - 1532358
The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design
DESI Collaboration;
Aghamousa, Amir;
Aguilar, Jessica;
Ahlen, Steve;
Alam, Shadab;
Allen, Lori E.;
Prieto, Carlos Allende;
Annis, James;
Bailey, Stephen;
Balland, Christophe;
Ballester, Otger;
Baltay, Charles;
Beaufore, Lucas;
Bebek, Chris;
Beers, Timothy C.;
Bell, Eric F.;
Bernal, José Luis;
Besuner, Robert;
Beutler, Florian;
Blake, Chris;
Bleuler, Hannes;
Blomqvist, Michael;
Blum, Robert;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Briceno, Cesar;
Brooks, David;
Brownstein, Joel R.;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Burden, Angela;
Burtin, Etienne;
Busca, Nicolas G.;
Cahn, Robert N.;
Cai, Yan-Chuan;
Cardiel-Sas, Laia;
Carlberg, Raymond G.;
Carton, Pierre-Henri;
Casas, Ricard;
Castander, Francisco J.;
Cervantes-Cota, Jorge L.;
Claybaugh, Todd M.;
Close, Madeline;
Coker, Carl T.;
Cole, Shaun;
Comparat, Johan;
Cooper, Andrew P.;
Cousinou, M. -C.;
Crocce, Martin;
Cuby, Jean-Gabriel;
Cunningham, Daniel P.;
Davis, Tamara M.;
Dawson, Kyle S.;
de la Macorra, Axel;
De Vicente, Juan;
Delubac, Timothée;
Derwent, Mark;
Dey, Arjun;
Dhungana, Govinda;
Ding, Zhejie;
Doel, Peter;
Duan, Yutong T.;
Ealet, Anne;
Edelstein, Jerry;
Eftekharzadeh, Sarah;
Eisenstein, Daniel J.;
Elliott, Ann;
Escoffier, Stéphanie;
Evatt, Matthew;
Fagrelius, Parker;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Fanning, Kevin;
Farahi, Arya;
Farihi, Jay;
Favole, Ginevra;
Feng, Yu;
Fernandez, Enrique;
Findlay, Joseph R.;
Finkbeiner, Douglas P.;
Fitzpatrick, Michael J.;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Flender, Samuel;
Font-Ribera, Andreu;
Forero-Romero, Jaime E.;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frenk, Carlos S.;
Fumagalli, Michele;
Gaensicke, Boris T.;
Gallo, Giuseppe;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Fusillo, Nicola Pietro Gentile;
Gerard, Terry;
Gershkovich, Irena;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Gillet, Denis;
Gonzalez-de-Rivera, Guillermo;
Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta;
Gott, Shelby;
Graur, Or;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Guy, Julien;
Habib, Salman;
Heetderks, Henry;
Heetderks, Ian;
Heitmann, Katrin;
Hellwing, Wojciech A.;
Herrera, David A.;
Ho, Shirley;
Holland, Stephen;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Huff, Eric;
Hutchinson, Timothy A.;
Huterer, Dragan;
Hwang, Ho Seong;
Laguna, Joseph Maria Illa;
Ishikawa, Yuzo;
Jacobs, Dianna;
Jeffrey, Niall;
Jelinsky, Patrick;
Jennings, Elise;
Jiang, Linhua;
Jimenez, Jorge;
Johnson, Jennifer;
Joyce, Richard;
Jullo, Eric;
Juneau, Stéphanie;
Kama, Sami;
Karcher, Armin;
Karkar, Sonia;
Kehoe, Robert;
Kennamer, Noble;
Kent, Stephen;
Kilbinger, Martin;
Kim, Alex G.;
Kirkby, David;
Kisner, Theodore;
Kitanidis, Ellie;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Koposov, Sergey;
Kovacs, Eve;
Koyama, Kazuya;
Kremin, Anthony;
Kron, Richard;
Kronig, Luzius;
Kueter-Young, Andrea;
Lacey, Cedric G.;
Lafever, Robin;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lambert, Andrew;
Lampton, Michael;
Landriau, Martin;
Lang, Dustin;
Lauer, Tod R.;
Goff, Jean-Marc Le;
Guillou, Laurent Le;
Van Suu, Auguste Le;
Lee, Jae Hyeon;
Lee, Su-Jeong;
Leitner, Daniela;
Lesser, Michael;
Levi, Michael E.;
L'Huillier, Benjamin;
Li, Baojiu;
Liang, Ming;
Lin, Huan;
Linder, Eric;
Loebman, Sarah R.;
Lukić, Zarija;
Ma, Jun;
MacCrann, Niall;
Magneville, Christophe;
Makarem, Laleh;
Manera, Marc;
Manser, Christopher J.;
Marshall, Robert;
Martini, Paul;
Massey, Richard;
Matheson, Thomas;
McCauley, Jeremy;
McDonald, Patrick;
McGreer, Ian D.;
Meisner, Aaron;
Metcalfe, Nigel;
Miller, Timothy N.;
Miquel, Ramon;
Moustakas, John;
Myers, Adam;
Naik, Milind;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Nicola, Andrina;
da Costa, Luiz Nicolati;
Nie, Jundan;
Niz, Gustavo;
Norberg, Peder;
Nord, Brian;
Norman, Dara;
Nugent, Peter;
O'Brien, Thomas;
Oh, Minji;
Olsen, Knut A. G.;
Padilla, Cristobal;
Padmanabhan, Hamsa;
Padmanabhan, Nikhil;
Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie;
Palmese, Antonella;
Pappalardo, Daniel;
Pâris, Isabelle;
Park, Changbom;
Patej, Anna;
Peacock, John A.;
Peiris, Hiranya V.;
Peng, Xiyan;
Percival, Will J.;
Perruchot, Sandrine;
Pieri, Matthew M.;
Pogge, Richard;
Pollack, Jennifer E.;
Poppett, Claire;
Prada, Francisco;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Probst, Ronald G.;
Rabinowitz, David;
Raichoor, Anand;
Ree, Chang Hee;
Refregier, Alexandre;
Regal, Xavier;
Reid, Beth;
Reil, Kevin;
Rezaie, Mehdi;
Rockosi, Constance M.;
Roe, Natalie;
Ronayette, Samuel;
Roodman, Aaron;
Ross, Ashley J.;
Ross, Nicholas P.;
Rossi, Graziano;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Ruhlmann-Kleider, Vanina;
Rykoff, Eli S.;
Sabiu, Cristiano;
Samushia, Lado;
Sanchez, Eusebio;
Sanchez, Javier;
Schlegel, David J.;
Schneider, Michael;
Schubnell, Michael;
Secroun, Aurélia;
Seljak, Uros;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Serrano, Santiago;
Shafieloo, Arman;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Sharples, Ray;
Sholl, Michael J.;
Shourt, William V.;
Silber, Joseph H.;
Silva, David R.;
Sirk, Martin M.;
Slosar, Anze;
Smith, Alex;
Smoot, George F.;
Som, Debopam;
Song, Yong-Seon;
Sprayberry, David;
Staten, Ryan;
Stefanik, Andy;
Tarle, Gregory;
Tie, Suk Sien;
Tinker, Jeremy L.;
Tojeiro, Rita;
Valdes, Francisco;
Valenzuela, Octavio;
Valluri, Monica;
Vargas-Magana, Mariana;
Verde, Licia;
Walker, Alistair R.;
Wang, Jiali;
Wang, Yuting;
Weaver, Benjamin A.;
Weaverdyck, Curtis;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Weinberg, David H.;
White, Martin;
Yang, Qian;
Yeche, Christophe;
Zhang, Tianmeng;
Zhao, Gong-Bo;
Zheng, Yi;
Zhou, Xu;
Zhou, Zhimin;
Zhu, Yaling;
Zou, Hu;
Zu, Ying
Submitted: 2016-10-31, last modified: 2016-12-13
DESI (Dark Energy Spectropic Instrument) is a Stage IV ground-based dark
energy experiment that will study baryon acoustic oscillations and the growth
of structure through redshift-space distortions with a wide-area galaxy and
quasar redshift survey. The DESI instrument is a robotically-actuated,
fiber-fed spectrograph capable of taking up to 5,000 simultaneous spectra over
a wavelength range from 360 nm to 980 nm. The fibers feed ten three-arm
spectrographs with resolution $R= \lambda/\Delta\lambda$ between 2000 and 5500,
depending on wavelength. The DESI instrument will be used to conduct a
five-year survey designed to cover 14,000 deg$^2$. This powerful instrument
will be installed at prime focus on the 4-m Mayall telescope in Kitt Peak,
Arizona, along with a new optical corrector, which will provide a three-degree
diameter field of view. The DESI collaboration will also deliver a
spectroscopic pipeline and data management system to reduce and archive all
data for eventual public use.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.00036 [pdf] - 1532357
The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design
DESI Collaboration;
Aghamousa, Amir;
Aguilar, Jessica;
Ahlen, Steve;
Alam, Shadab;
Allen, Lori E.;
Prieto, Carlos Allende;
Annis, James;
Bailey, Stephen;
Balland, Christophe;
Ballester, Otger;
Baltay, Charles;
Beaufore, Lucas;
Bebek, Chris;
Beers, Timothy C.;
Bell, Eric F.;
Bernal, José Luis;
Besuner, Robert;
Beutler, Florian;
Blake, Chris;
Bleuler, Hannes;
Blomqvist, Michael;
Blum, Robert;
Bolton, Adam S.;
Briceno, Cesar;
Brooks, David;
Brownstein, Joel R.;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Burden, Angela;
Burtin, Etienne;
Busca, Nicolas G.;
Cahn, Robert N.;
Cai, Yan-Chuan;
Cardiel-Sas, Laia;
Carlberg, Raymond G.;
Carton, Pierre-Henri;
Casas, Ricard;
Castander, Francisco J.;
Cervantes-Cota, Jorge L.;
Claybaugh, Todd M.;
Close, Madeline;
Coker, Carl T.;
Cole, Shaun;
Comparat, Johan;
Cooper, Andrew P.;
Cousinou, M. -C.;
Crocce, Martin;
Cuby, Jean-Gabriel;
Cunningham, Daniel P.;
Davis, Tamara M.;
Dawson, Kyle S.;
de la Macorra, Axel;
De Vicente, Juan;
Delubac, Timothée;
Derwent, Mark;
Dey, Arjun;
Dhungana, Govinda;
Ding, Zhejie;
Doel, Peter;
Duan, Yutong T.;
Ealet, Anne;
Edelstein, Jerry;
Eftekharzadeh, Sarah;
Eisenstein, Daniel J.;
Elliott, Ann;
Escoffier, Stéphanie;
Evatt, Matthew;
Fagrelius, Parker;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Fanning, Kevin;
Farahi, Arya;
Farihi, Jay;
Favole, Ginevra;
Feng, Yu;
Fernandez, Enrique;
Findlay, Joseph R.;
Finkbeiner, Douglas P.;
Fitzpatrick, Michael J.;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Flender, Samuel;
Font-Ribera, Andreu;
Forero-Romero, Jaime E.;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frenk, Carlos S.;
Fumagalli, Michele;
Gaensicke, Boris T.;
Gallo, Giuseppe;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Fusillo, Nicola Pietro Gentile;
Gerard, Terry;
Gershkovich, Irena;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Gillet, Denis;
Gonzalez-de-Rivera, Guillermo;
Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta;
Gott, Shelby;
Graur, Or;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Guy, Julien;
Habib, Salman;
Heetderks, Henry;
Heetderks, Ian;
Heitmann, Katrin;
Hellwing, Wojciech A.;
Herrera, David A.;
Ho, Shirley;
Holland, Stephen;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Huff, Eric;
Hutchinson, Timothy A.;
Huterer, Dragan;
Hwang, Ho Seong;
Laguna, Joseph Maria Illa;
Ishikawa, Yuzo;
Jacobs, Dianna;
Jeffrey, Niall;
Jelinsky, Patrick;
Jennings, Elise;
Jiang, Linhua;
Jimenez, Jorge;
Johnson, Jennifer;
Joyce, Richard;
Jullo, Eric;
Juneau, Stéphanie;
Kama, Sami;
Karcher, Armin;
Karkar, Sonia;
Kehoe, Robert;
Kennamer, Noble;
Kent, Stephen;
Kilbinger, Martin;
Kim, Alex G.;
Kirkby, David;
Kisner, Theodore;
Kitanidis, Ellie;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Koposov, Sergey;
Kovacs, Eve;
Koyama, Kazuya;
Kremin, Anthony;
Kron, Richard;
Kronig, Luzius;
Kueter-Young, Andrea;
Lacey, Cedric G.;
Lafever, Robin;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lambert, Andrew;
Lampton, Michael;
Landriau, Martin;
Lang, Dustin;
Lauer, Tod R.;
Goff, Jean-Marc Le;
Guillou, Laurent Le;
Van Suu, Auguste Le;
Lee, Jae Hyeon;
Lee, Su-Jeong;
Leitner, Daniela;
Lesser, Michael;
Levi, Michael E.;
L'Huillier, Benjamin;
Li, Baojiu;
Liang, Ming;
Lin, Huan;
Linder, Eric;
Loebman, Sarah R.;
Lukić, Zarija;
Ma, Jun;
MacCrann, Niall;
Magneville, Christophe;
Makarem, Laleh;
Manera, Marc;
Manser, Christopher J.;
Marshall, Robert;
Martini, Paul;
Massey, Richard;
Matheson, Thomas;
McCauley, Jeremy;
McDonald, Patrick;
McGreer, Ian D.;
Meisner, Aaron;
Metcalfe, Nigel;
Miller, Timothy N.;
Miquel, Ramon;
Moustakas, John;
Myers, Adam;
Naik, Milind;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Nicola, Andrina;
da Costa, Luiz Nicolati;
Nie, Jundan;
Niz, Gustavo;
Norberg, Peder;
Nord, Brian;
Norman, Dara;
Nugent, Peter;
O'Brien, Thomas;
Oh, Minji;
Olsen, Knut A. G.;
Padilla, Cristobal;
Padmanabhan, Hamsa;
Padmanabhan, Nikhil;
Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie;
Palmese, Antonella;
Pappalardo, Daniel;
Pâris, Isabelle;
Park, Changbom;
Patej, Anna;
Peacock, John A.;
Peiris, Hiranya V.;
Peng, Xiyan;
Percival, Will J.;
Perruchot, Sandrine;
Pieri, Matthew M.;
Pogge, Richard;
Pollack, Jennifer E.;
Poppett, Claire;
Prada, Francisco;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Probst, Ronald G.;
Rabinowitz, David;
Raichoor, Anand;
Ree, Chang Hee;
Refregier, Alexandre;
Regal, Xavier;
Reid, Beth;
Reil, Kevin;
Rezaie, Mehdi;
Rockosi, Constance M.;
Roe, Natalie;
Ronayette, Samuel;
Roodman, Aaron;
Ross, Ashley J.;
Ross, Nicholas P.;
Rossi, Graziano;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Ruhlmann-Kleider, Vanina;
Rykoff, Eli S.;
Sabiu, Cristiano;
Samushia, Lado;
Sanchez, Eusebio;
Sanchez, Javier;
Schlegel, David J.;
Schneider, Michael;
Schubnell, Michael;
Secroun, Aurélia;
Seljak, Uros;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Serrano, Santiago;
Shafieloo, Arman;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Sharples, Ray;
Sholl, Michael J.;
Shourt, William V.;
Silber, Joseph H.;
Silva, David R.;
Sirk, Martin M.;
Slosar, Anze;
Smith, Alex;
Smoot, George F.;
Som, Debopam;
Song, Yong-Seon;
Sprayberry, David;
Staten, Ryan;
Stefanik, Andy;
Tarle, Gregory;
Tie, Suk Sien;
Tinker, Jeremy L.;
Tojeiro, Rita;
Valdes, Francisco;
Valenzuela, Octavio;
Valluri, Monica;
Vargas-Magana, Mariana;
Verde, Licia;
Walker, Alistair R.;
Wang, Jiali;
Wang, Yuting;
Weaver, Benjamin A.;
Weaverdyck, Curtis;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Weinberg, David H.;
White, Martin;
Yang, Qian;
Yeche, Christophe;
Zhang, Tianmeng;
Zhao, Gong-Bo;
Zheng, Yi;
Zhou, Xu;
Zhou, Zhimin;
Zhu, Yaling;
Zou, Hu;
Zu, Ying
Submitted: 2016-10-31, last modified: 2016-12-13
DESI (Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument) is a Stage IV ground-based dark
energy experiment that will study baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and the
growth of structure through redshift-space distortions with a wide-area galaxy
and quasar redshift survey. To trace the underlying dark matter distribution,
spectroscopic targets will be selected in four classes from imaging data. We
will measure luminous red galaxies up to $z=1.0$. To probe the Universe out to
even higher redshift, DESI will target bright [O II] emission line galaxies up
to $z=1.7$. Quasars will be targeted both as direct tracers of the underlying
dark matter distribution and, at higher redshifts ($ 2.1 < z < 3.5$), for the
Ly-$\alpha$ forest absorption features in their spectra, which will be used to
trace the distribution of neutral hydrogen. When moonlight prevents efficient
observations of the faint targets of the baseline survey, DESI will conduct a
magnitude-limited Bright Galaxy Survey comprising approximately 10 million
galaxies with a median $z\approx 0.2$. In total, more than 30 million galaxy
and quasar redshifts will be obtained to measure the BAO feature and determine
the matter power spectrum, including redshift space distortions.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.05773 [pdf] - 1443805
Galaxy Cluster Mass Estimation from Stacked Spectroscopic Analysis
Submitted: 2016-01-21
We use simulated galaxy surveys to study: i) how galaxy membership in
redMaPPer clusters maps to the underlying halo population, and ii) the accuracy
of a mean dynamical cluster mass, $M_\sigma(\lambda)$, derived from stacked
pairwise spectroscopy of clusters with richness $\lambda$. Using $\sim\!
130,000$ galaxy pairs patterned after the SDSS redMaPPer cluster sample study
of Rozo et al. (2015 RMIV), we show that the pairwise velocity PDF of
central--satellite pairs with $m_i < 19$ in the simulation matches the form
seen in RMIV. Through joint membership matching, we deconstruct the main
Gaussian velocity component into its halo contributions, finding that the
top-ranked halo contributes $\sim 60\%$ of the stacked signal. The halo mass
scale inferred by applying the virial scaling of Evrard et al. (2008) to the
velocity normalization matches, to within a few percent, the log-mean halo mass
derived through galaxy membership matching. We apply this approach, along with
mis-centering and galaxy velocity bias corrections, to estimate the log-mean
matched halo mass at $z=0.2$ of SDSS redMaPPer clusters. Employing the velocity
bias constraints of Guo et al. (2015), we find $\langle \ln(M_{200c})|\lambda
\rangle = \ln(M_{30}) + \alpha_m \ln(\lambda/30)$ with $M_{30} = 1.56 \pm 0.35
\times 10^{14} M_\odot$ and $\alpha_m = 1.31 \pm 0.06_{stat} \pm 0.13_{sys}$.
Systematic uncertainty in the velocity bias of satellite galaxies
overwhelmingly dominates the error budget.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.04317 [pdf] - 1426198
The XXL Survey: I. Scientific motivations - XMM-Newton observing plan -
Follow-up observations and simulation programme
Pierre, M.;
Pacaud, F.;
Adami, C.;
Alis, S.;
Altieri, B.;
Baran, B.;
Benoist, C.;
Birkinshaw, M.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Bremer, M. N.;
Brusa, M.;
Butler, A.;
Ciliegi, P.;
Chiappetti, L.;
Clerc, N.;
Corasaniti, P. S.;
Coupon, J.;
De Breuck, C.;
Democles, J.;
Desai, S.;
Delhaize, J.;
Devriendt, J.;
Dubois, Y.;
Eckert, D.;
Elyiv, A.;
Ettori, S.;
Evrard, A.;
Faccioli, L.;
Farahi, A.;
Ferrari, C.;
Finet, F.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Gandhi, P.;
Gastaldello, F.;
Gastaud, R.;
Georgantopoulos, I.;
Giles, P.;
Guennou, L.;
Guglielmo, V.;
Horellou, C.;
Husband, K.;
Huynh, M;
Iovino, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Koulouridis, E.;
Lavoie, S.;
Brun, A. M. C. Le;
Fevre, J. P. Le;
Lidman, C.;
Lieu, M.;
Lin, C. A.;
Mantz, A.;
Maughan, B. J.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCarthy, I. G.;
McGee, S.;
Melin, J. B.;
Melnyk, O.;
Menanteau, F.;
Novak, M.;
Paltani, S.;
Plionis, M.;
Poggianti, B. M.;
Pomarede, D.;
Pompei, E.;
Ponman, T. J.;
Ramos-Ceja, M. E.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rapetti, D.;
Raychaudury, S.;
Reiprich, T. H.;
Rottgering, H.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E.;
Sadibekova, T.;
Santos, J.;
Sauvageot, J. L.;
Schimd, C.;
Sereno, M.;
Smith, G. P.;
Smolčić, V.;
Snowden, S.;
Spergel, D.;
Stanford, S.;
Surdej, J.;
Valageas, P.;
Valotti, A.;
Valtchanov, I.;
Vignali, C.;
Willis, J.;
Ziparo, F.
Submitted: 2015-12-14
We present the XXL Survey, the largest XMM programme totaling some 6.9 Ms to
date and involving an international consortium of roughly 100 members. The XXL
Survey covers two extragalactic areas of 25 deg2 each at a point-source
sensitivity of ~ 5E-15 erg/sec/cm2 in the [0.5-2] keV band (completeness
limit). The survey's main goals are to provide constraints on the dark energy
equation of state from the space-time distribution of clusters of galaxies and
to serve as a pathfinder for future, wide-area X-ray missions. We review
science objectives, including cluster studies, AGN evolution, and large-scale
structure, that are being conducted with the support of approximately 30
follow-up programmes. We describe the 542 XMM observations along with the
associated multi-lambda and numerical simulation programmes. We give a detailed
account of the X-ray processing steps and describe innovative tools being
developed for the cosmological analysis. The paper provides a thorough
evaluation of the X-ray data, including quality controls, photon statistics,
exposure and background maps, and sky coverage. Source catalogue construction
and multi-lambda associations are briefly described. This material will be the
basis for the calculation of the cluster and AGN selection functions, critical
elements of the cosmological and science analyses. The XXL multi-lambda data
set will have a unique lasting legacy value for cosmological and extragalactic
studies and will serve as a calibration resource for future dark energy studies
with clusters and other X-ray selected sources. With the present article, we
release the XMM XXL photon and smoothed images along with the corresponding
exposure maps. The XMM XXL observation list (Table B.1) is available in
electronic form at the CDS. The present paper is the first in a series
reporting results of the XXL-XMM survey.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.1456 [pdf] - 1208215
A Model for Multi-property Galaxy Cluster Statistics
Submitted: 2014-03-06
The massive dark matter halos that host groups and clusters of galaxies have
observable properties that appear to be log-normally distributed about
power-law mean scaling relations in halo mass. Coupling this assumption with
either quadratic or cubic approximations to the mass function in log space, we
derive closed-form expressions for the space density of halos as a function of
multiple observables as well as forms for the low-order moments of properties
of observable-selected samples. Using a Tinker mass function in a {\Lambda}CDM
cosmology, we show that the cubic analytic model reproduces results obtained
from direct, numerical convolution at the 10 percent level or better over
nearly the full range of observables covered by current observations and for
redshifts extending to z = 1.5. The model provides an efficient framework for
estimating effects arising from selection and covariance among observable
properties in survey samples.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.0337 [pdf] - 784684
Excursion Set Theory for Correlated Random Walks
Submitted: 2013-03-01, last modified: 2013-06-08
We present a new method to compute the first crossing distribution in
excursion set theory for the case of correlated random walks. We use a
combination of the path integral formalism of Maggiore & Riotto, and the
integral equation solution of Zhang & Hui, and Benson et al. to find a
numerically robust and convenient algorithm to derive the first crossing
distribution in terms of a perturbative expansion around the limit of an
uncorrelated random walk. We apply this methodology to the specific case of a
Gaussian random density field filtered with a Gaussian smoothing function. By
comparing our solutions to results from Monte Carlo calculations of the first
crossing distribution we demonstrate that our method accurate for power spectra
$P(k)\propto k^n$ for $n=1$, becoming less accurate for smaller values of $n$.
It is therefore complementary to the method of Musso & Sheth, which will
therefore be more useful for standard $\Lambda$CDM power spectra. Our approach
is quite general, and can be adapted to other smoothing functions, and also to
non-Gaussian density fields.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.3018 [pdf] - 1151396
Dark Matter Halo Merger Histories Beyond Cold Dark Matter: I - Methods
and Application to Warm Dark Matter
Submitted: 2012-09-13, last modified: 2012-10-07
We describe a methodology to accurately compute halo mass functions,
progenitor mass functions, merger rates and merger trees in non-cold dark
matter universes using a self-consistent treatment of the generalized extended
Press-Schechter formalism. Our approach permits rapid exploration of the
subhalo population of galactic halos in dark matter models with a variety of
different particle properties or universes with rolling, truncated, or more
complicated power spectra. We make detailed comparisons of analytically derived
mass functions and merger histories with recent warm dark matter cosmological
N-body simulations, and find excellent agreement. We show that, once the
accretion of smoothly distributed matter is accounted for, coarse-grained
statistics such as the mass accretion history of halos can be almost
indistinguishable between cold and warm dark matter cases. However, the halo
mass function and progenitor mass functions differ significantly, with the warm
dark matter cases being strongly suppressed below the free-streaming scale of
the dark matter. We demonstrate the importance of using the correct solution
for the excursion set barrier first-crossing distribution in warm dark matter -
if the solution for a flat barrier is used instead the truncation of the halo
mass function is much slower, leading to an overestimate of the number of low
mass halos.