Normalized to: Fantaye, Y.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.08992 [pdf] - 2097496
Deep Learning improves Radio Frequency Interference Classification
Submitted: 2020-05-18
Flagging of Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) is an increasingly important
challenge in radio astronomy. We present R-Net, a deep convolutional ResNet
architecture that significantly outperforms existing algorithms -- including
the default MeerKAT RFI flagger, and deep U-Net architectures -- across all
metrics including AUC, F1-score and MCC. We demonstrate the robustness of this
improvement on both single dish and interferometric simulations and, using
transfer learning, on real data. Our R-Net model's precision is approximately
$90\%$ better than the current MeerKAT flagger at $80\%$ recall and has a 35\%
higher F1-score with no additional performance cost. We further highlight the
effectiveness of transfer learning from a model initially trained on simulated
MeerKAT data and fine-tuned on real, human-flagged, KAT-7 data. Despite the
wide differences in the nature of the two telescope arrays, the model achieves
an AUC of 0.91, while the best model without transfer learning only reaches an
AUC of 0.67. We consider the use of phase information in our models but find
that without calibration the phase adds almost no extra information relative to
amplitude data only. Our results strongly suggest that deep learning on
simulations, boosted by transfer learning on real data, will likely play a key
role in the future of RFI flagging of radio astronomy data.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06205 [pdf] - 2009439
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-12-03
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying
the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009.
It scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August
2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine
frequency bands from 30 to 857GHz. This paper presents the cosmological legacy
of Planck, which currently provides our strongest constraints on the parameters
of the standard cosmological model and some of the tightest limits available on
deviations from that model. The 6-parameter LCDM model continues to provide an
excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift,
describing the cosmological information in over a billion map pixels with just
six parameters. With 18 peaks in the temperature and polarization angular power
spectra constrained well, Planck measures five of the six parameters to better
than 1% (simultaneously), with the best-determined parameter (theta_*) now
known to 0.03%. We describe the multi-component sky as seen by Planck, the
success of the LCDM model, and the connection to lower-redshift probes of
structure formation. We also give a comprehensive summary of the major changes
introduced in this 2018 release. The Planck data, alone and in combination with
other probes, provide stringent constraints on our models of the early Universe
and the large-scale structure within which all astrophysical objects form and
evolve. We discuss some lessons learned from the Planck mission, and highlight
areas ripe for further experimental advances.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06209 [pdf] - 1965163
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lemos, P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-09-20
We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck
measurements of the CMB anisotropies. We find good consistency with the
standard spatially-flat 6-parameter $\Lambda$CDM cosmology having a power-law
spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base $\Lambda$CDM" in this
paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in
combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density $\Omega_c h^2 =
0.120\pm 0.001$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001$, scalar
spectral index $n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004$, and optical depth $\tau = 0.054\pm
0.007$ (in this abstract we quote $68\,\%$ confidence regions on measured
parameters and $95\,\%$ on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is
measured to $0.03\,\%$ precision, with $100\theta_*=1.0411\pm 0.0003$. These
results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable,
with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions.
Assuming the base-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the inferred late-Universe parameters
are: Hubble constant $H_0 = (67.4\pm 0.5)$km/s/Mpc; matter density parameter
$\Omega_m = 0.315\pm 0.007$; and matter fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8 =
0.811\pm 0.006$. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the
base-$\Lambda$CDM model. Combining with BAO we constrain the effective extra
relativistic degrees of freedom to be $N_{\rm eff} = 2.99\pm 0.17$, and the
neutrino mass is tightly constrained to $\sum m_\nu< 0.12$eV. The CMB spectra
continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base
-$\Lambda$CDM at over $2\,\sigma$, which pulls some parameters that affect the
lensing amplitude away from the base-$\Lambda$CDM model; however, this is not
supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the
background geometry) BAO data. (Abridged)
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06211 [pdf] - 1927941
Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Hooper, D. C.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lpez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-08-02
We report on the implications for cosmic inflation of the 2018 Release of the
Planck CMB anisotropy measurements. The results are fully consistent with the
two previous Planck cosmological releases, but have smaller uncertainties
thanks to improvements in the characterization of polarization at low and high
multipoles. Planck temperature, polarization, and lensing data determine the
spectral index of scalar perturbations to be $n_\mathrm{s}=0.9649\pm 0.0042$ at
68% CL and show no evidence for a scale dependence of $n_\mathrm{s}.$ Spatial
flatness is confirmed at a precision of 0.4% at 95% CL with the combination
with BAO data. The Planck 95% CL upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio,
$r_{0.002}<0.10$, is further tightened by combining with the BICEP2/Keck Array
BK15 data to obtain $r_{0.002}<0.056$. In the framework of single-field
inflationary models with Einstein gravity, these results imply that: (a)
slow-roll models with a concave potential, $V" (\phi) < 0,$ are increasingly
favoured by the data; and (b) two different methods for reconstructing the
inflaton potential find no evidence for dynamics beyond slow roll.
Non-parametric reconstructions of the primordial power spectrum consistently
confirm a pure power law. A complementary analysis also finds no evidence for
theoretically motivated parameterized features in the Planck power spectrum, a
result further strengthened for certain oscillatory models by a new combined
analysis that includes Planck bispectrum data. The new Planck polarization data
provide a stringent test of the adiabaticity of the initial conditions. The
polarization data also provide improved constraints on inflationary models that
predict a small statistically anisotropic quadrupolar modulation of the
primordial fluctuations. However, the polarization data do not confirm physical
models for a scale-dependent dipolar modulation.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.12875 [pdf] - 1925231
Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-07-30
This paper describes the 2018 Planck CMB likelihoods, following a hybrid
approach similar to the 2015 one, with different approximations at low and high
multipoles, and implementing several methodological and analysis refinements.
With more realistic simulations, and better correction and modelling of
systematics, we can now make full use of the High Frequency Instrument
polarization data. The low-multipole 100x143 GHz EE cross-spectrum constrains
the reionization optical-depth parameter $\tau$ to better than 15% (in
combination with with the other low- and high-$\ell$ likelihoods). We also
update the 2015 baseline low-$\ell$ joint TEB likelihood based on the Low
Frequency Instrument data, which provides a weaker $\tau$ constraint. At high
multipoles, a better model of the temperature-to-polarization leakage and
corrections for the effective calibrations of the polarization channels
(polarization efficiency or PE) allow us to fully use the polarization spectra,
improving the constraints on the $\Lambda$CDM parameters by 20 to 30% compared
to TT-only constraints. Tests on the modelling of the polarization demonstrate
good consistency, with some residual modelling uncertainties, the accuracy of
the PE modelling being the main limitation. Using our various tests,
simulations, and comparison between different high-$\ell$ implementations, we
estimate the consistency of the results to be better than the 0.5$\sigma$
level. Minor curiosities already present before (differences between $\ell$<800
and $\ell$>800 parameters or the preference for more smoothing of the $C_\ell$
peaks) are shown to be driven by the TT power spectrum and are not
significantly modified by the inclusion of polarization. Overall, the legacy
Planck CMB likelihoods provide a robust tool for constraining the cosmological
model and represent a reference for future CMB observations. (Abridged)
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06210 [pdf] - 1924023
Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-07-29
We present measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing
potential using the final $\textit{Planck}$ 2018 temperature and polarization
data. We increase the significance of the detection of lensing in the
polarization maps from $5\,\sigma$ to $9\,\sigma$. Combined with temperature,
lensing is detected at $40\,\sigma$. We present an extensive set of tests of
the robustness of the lensing-potential power spectrum, and construct a
minimum-variance estimator likelihood over lensing multipoles $8 \le L \le
400$. We find good consistency between lensing constraints and the results from
the $\textit{Planck}$ CMB power spectra within the $\rm{\Lambda CDM}$ model.
Combined with baryon density and other weak priors, the lensing analysis alone
constrains $\sigma_8 \Omega_{\rm m}^{0.25}=0.589\pm 0.020$ ($1\,\sigma$
errors). Also combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data, we find
tight individual parameter constraints, $\sigma_8=0.811\pm0.019$,
$H_0=67.9_{-1.3}^{+1.2}\,\text{km}\,\text{s}^{-1}\,\rm{Mpc}^{-1}$, and
$\Omega_{\rm m}=0.303^{+0.016}_{-0.018}$. Combining with $\textit{Planck}$ CMB
power spectrum data, we measure $\sigma_8$ to better than $1\,\%$ precision,
finding $\sigma_8=0.811\pm 0.006$. We find consistency with the lensing results
from the Dark Energy Survey, and give combined lensing-only parameter
constraints that are tighter than joint results using galaxy clustering. Using
$\textit{Planck}$ cosmic infrared background (CIB) maps we make a combined
estimate of the lensing potential over $60\,\%$ of the sky with considerably
more small-scale signal. We demonstrate delensing of the $\textit{Planck}$
power spectra, detecting a maximum removal of $40\,\%$ of the lensing-induced
power in all spectra. The improvement in the sharpening of the acoustic peaks
by including both CIB and the quadratic lensing reconstruction is detected at
high significance (abridged).
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.02552 [pdf] - 1896098
Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-06-06
Analysis of the Planck 2018 data set indicates that the statistical
properties of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies
are in excellent agreement with previous studies using the 2013 and 2015 data
releases. In particular, they are consistent with the Gaussian predictions of
the $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, yet also confirm the presence of several
so-called "anomalies" on large angular scales. The novelty of the current
study, however, lies in being a first attempt at a comprehensive analysis of
the statistics of the polarization signal over all angular scales, using either
maps of the Stokes parameters, $Q$ and $U$, or the $E$-mode signal derived from
these using a new methodology (which we describe in an appendix). Although
remarkable progress has been made in reducing the systematic effects that
contaminated the 2015 polarization maps on large angular scales, it is still
the case that residual systematics (and our ability to simulate them) can limit
some tests of non-Gaussianity and isotropy. However, a detailed set of null
tests applied to the maps indicates that these issues do not dominate the
analysis on intermediate and large angular scales (i.e., $\ell \lesssim 400$).
In this regime, no unambiguous detections of cosmological non-Gaussianity, or
of anomalies corresponding to those seen in temperature, are claimed. Notably,
the stacking of CMB polarization signals centred on the positions of
temperature hot and cold spots exhibits excellent agreement with the
$\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, and also gives a clear indication of how
Planck provides state-of-the-art measurements of CMB temperature and
polarization on degree scales.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.05697 [pdf] - 1882757
Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Jung, G.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Oppizzi, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Smith, K.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stanco, L.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-05-14
We analyse the Planck full-mission cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature and E-mode polarization maps to obtain constraints on primordial
non-Gaussianity (NG). We compare estimates obtained from separable
template-fitting, binned, and modal bispectrum estimators, finding consistent
values for the local, equilateral, and orthogonal bispectrum amplitudes. Our
combined temperature and polarization analysis produces the following results:
f_NL^local = -0.9 +\- 5.1; f_NL^equil = -26 +\- 47; and f_NL^ortho = - 38 +\-
24 (68%CL, statistical). These results include the low-multipole (4 <= l < 40)
polarization data, not included in our previous analysis, pass an extensive
battery of tests, and are stable with respect to our 2015 measurements.
Polarization bispectra display a significant improvement in robustness; they
can now be used independently to set NG constraints. We consider a large number
of additional cases, e.g. scale-dependent feature and resonance bispectra,
isocurvature primordial NG, and parity-breaking models, where we also place
tight constraints but do not detect any signal. The non-primordial lensing
bispectrum is detected with an improved significance compared to 2015,
excluding the null hypothesis at 3.5 sigma. We present model-independent
reconstructions and analyses of the CMB bispectrum. Our final constraint on the
local trispectrum shape is g_NLl^local = (-5.8 +\-6.5) x 10^4 (68%CL,
statistical), while constraints for other trispectra are also determined. We
constrain the parameter space of different early-Universe scenarios, including
general single-field models of inflation, multi-field and axion field
parity-breaking models. Our results provide a high-precision test for
structure-formation scenarios, in complete agreement with the basic picture of
the LambdaCDM cosmology regarding the statistics of the initial conditions
(abridged).
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06212 [pdf] - 1844974
Planck 2018 results. XII. Galactic astrophysics using polarized dust
emission
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Ferrière, K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Green, G.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Guillet, V.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-03-07
We present 353 GHz full-sky maps of the polarization fraction $p$, angle
$\psi$, and dispersion of angles $S$ of Galactic dust thermal emission produced
from the 2018 release of Planck data. We confirm that the mean and maximum of
$p$ decrease with increasing $N_H$. The uncertainty on the maximum polarization
fraction, $p_\mathrm{max}=22.0$% at 80 arcmin resolution, is dominated by the
uncertainty on the zero level in total intensity. The observed inverse
behaviour between $p$ and $S$ is interpreted with models of the polarized sky
that include effects from only the topology of the turbulent Galactic magnetic
field. Thus, the statistical properties of $p$, $\psi$, and $S$ mostly reflect
the structure of the magnetic field. Nevertheless, we search for potential
signatures of varying grain alignment and dust properties. First, we analyse
the product map $S \times p$, looking for residual trends. While $p$ decreases
by a factor of 3--4 between $N_H=10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ and $N_H=2\times 10^{22}$
cm$^{-2}$, $S \times p$ decreases by only about 25%, a systematic trend
observed in both the diffuse ISM and molecular clouds. Second, we find no
systematic trend of $S \times p$ with the dust temperature, even though in the
diffuse ISM lines of sight with high $p$ and low $S$ tend to have colder dust.
We also compare Planck data with starlight polarization in the visible at high
latitudes. The agreement in polarization angles is remarkable. Two polarization
emission-to-extinction ratios that characterize dust optical properties depend
only weakly on $N_H$ and converge towards the values previously determined for
translucent lines of sight. We determine an upper limit for the polarization
fraction in extinction of 13%, compatible with the $p_\mathrm{max}$ observed in
emission. These results provide strong constraints for models of Galactic dust
in diffuse gas.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.06636 [pdf] - 1833412
Point Source Detection and False Discovery Rate Control on CMB Maps
Submitted: 2019-02-18
We discuss a new procedure to search for point sources in Cosmic Microwave
background maps; in particular, we aim at controlling the so-called False
Discovery Rate, which is defined as the expected value of false discoveries
among pixels which are labelled as contaminated by point sources. We exploit a
procedure called STEM, which is based on the following four steps: 1) needlet
filtering of the observed CMB maps, to improve the signal to noise ratio; 2)
selection of candidate peaks, i.e., the local maxima of filtered maps; 3)
computation of \emph{p-}values for local maxima; 4) implementation of the
multiple testing procedure, by means of the so-called Benjamini-Hochberg
method. Our procedures are also implemented on the latest release of Planck CMB
maps.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.04945 [pdf] - 1782697
Planck 2018 results. XI. Polarized dust foregrounds
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Ferrière, K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Guillet, V.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Soler, J. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-01-15, last modified: 2018-11-12
The study of polarized dust emission has become entwined with the analysis of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization. We use new Planck maps to
characterize Galactic dust emission as a foreground to the CMB polarization. We
present Planck EE, BB, and TE power spectra of dust polarization at 353 GHz for
six nested sky regions covering from 24 to 71 % of the sky. We present
power-law fits to the angular power spectra, yielding evidence for
statistically significant variations of the exponents over sky regions and a
difference between the values for the EE and BB spectra. The TE correlation and
E/B power asymmetry extend to low multipoles that were not included in earlier
Planck polarization papers. We also report evidence for a positive TB dust
signal. Combining data from Planck and WMAP, we determine the amplitudes and
spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of polarized foregrounds, including the
correlation between dust and synchrotron polarized emission, for the six sky
regions as a function of multipole. This quantifies the challenge of the
component separation procedure required for detecting the reionization and
recombination peaks of primordial CMB B modes. The SED of polarized dust
emission is fit well by a single-temperature modified blackbody emission law
from 353 GHz to below 70 GHz. For a dust temperature of 19.6 K, the mean
spectral index for dust polarization is $\beta_{\rm d}^{P} = 1.53\pm0.02 $. By
fitting multi-frequency cross-spectra, we examine the correlation of the dust
polarization maps across frequency. We find no evidence for decorrelation. If
the Planck limit for the largest sky region applies to the smaller sky regions
observed by sub-orbital experiments, then decorrelation might not be a problem
for CMB experiments aiming at a primordial B-mode detection limit on the
tensor-to-scalar ratio $r\simeq0.01$ at the recombination peak.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06206 [pdf] - 1747982
Planck 2018 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Argüeso, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Peel, M.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Seljebotn, D. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2018-09-11
We present a final description of the data-processing pipeline for the
Planck, Low Frequency Instrument (LFI), implemented for the 2018 data release.
Several improvements have been made with respect to the previous release,
especially in the calibration process and in the correction of instrumental
features such as the effects of nonlinearity in the response of the
analogue-to-digital converters. We provide a brief pedagogical introduction to
the complete pipeline, as well as a detailed description of the important
changes implemented. Self-consistency of the pipeline is demonstrated using
dedicated simulations and null tests. We present the final version of the LFI
full sky maps at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, both in temperature and polarization,
together with a refined estimate of the Solar dipole and a final assessment of
the main LFI instrumental parameters.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.08649 [pdf] - 1783719
Planck intermediate results. LIV. The Planck Multi-frequency Catalogue
of Non-thermal Sources
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Argüeso, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-02-23, last modified: 2018-09-11
This paper presents the Planck Multi-frequency Catalogue of Non-thermal (i.e.
synchrotron-dominated) Sources (PCNT) observed between 30 and 857 GHz by the
ESA Planck mission. This catalogue was constructed by selecting objects
detected in the full mission all-sky temperature maps at 30 and 143 GHz, with a
signal-to-noise ratio (S/N)>3 in at least one of the two channels after
filtering with a particular Mexican hat wavelet. As a result, 29400 source
candidates were selected. Then, a multi-frequency analysis was performed using
the Matrix Filters methodology at the position of these objects, and flux
densities and errors were calculated for all of them in the nine Planck
channels. The present catalogue is the first unbiased, full-sky catalogue of
synchrotron-dominated sources published at millimetre and submillimetre
wavelengths and constitutes a powerful database for statistical studies of
non-thermal extragalactic sources, whose emission is dominated by the central
active galactic nucleus. Together with the full multi-frequency catalogue, we
also define the Bright Planck Multi-frequency Catalogue of Non-thermal Sources
PCNTb, where only those objects with a S/N>4 at both 30 and 143 GHz were
selected. In this catalogue 1146 compact sources are detected outside the
adopted Planck GAL070 mask; thus, these sources constitute a highly reliable
sample of extragalactic radio sources. We also flag the high-significance
subsample PCNThs, a subset of 151 sources that are detected with S/N>4 in all
nine Planck channels, 75 of which are found outside the Planck mask adopted
here. The remaining 76 sources inside the Galactic mask are very likely
Galactic objects.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.09201 [pdf] - 1756029
Bayesian Evidence against Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum in tension
cosmology
Submitted: 2018-08-28
Current cosmological constraints on the scalar spectral index of primordial
fluctuations $n_{\rm s}$ in the $\Lambda$CDM model have excluded the minimal
scale-invariant Harrison-Zel'dovich model ($n_{\rm s}=1$; hereafter HZ) at high
significance, providing support for inflation. In recent years, however, some
tensions have emerged between different cosmological datasets that, if not due
to systematics, could indicate the presence of new physics beyond the
$\Lambda$CDM model. In the light of these developments, we evaluate the
Bayesian evidence against HZ in different data combinations and model
extensions. Considering only the Planck temperature data, we find inconclusive
evidence against HZ when including variations in the neutrino number $N_{\rm
eff}$ and/or the Helium abundance $Y_{\rm He}$. Adding the Planck polarization
data, on the other hand, yields strong evidence against HZ in the extensions we
considered. Perhaps most interestingly, Planck temperature data combined with
local measurements of the Hubble constant give as the most probable model an HZ
spectrum, with additional neutrinos. However, with the inclusion of
polarisation, standard $\Lambda$CDM is once again preferred, but the HZ model
with extra neutrinos is not strongly disfavored. The possibility of fully
ruling out the HZ spectrum is therefore ultimately connected with the solution
to current tensions between cosmological datasets. If these tensions are
confirmed by future data, then new physical mechanisms could be at work and an
HZ spectrum could still offer a valid alternative.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.00132 [pdf] - 1755826
Planck intermediate results. LIII. Detection of velocity dispersion from
the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gerbino, M.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stanco, L.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2017-07-01, last modified: 2018-08-23
Using the ${\it Planck}$ full-mission data, we present a detection of the
temperature (and therefore velocity) dispersion due to the kinetic
Sunyaev-Zeldovich (kSZ) effect from clusters of galaxies. To suppress the
primary CMB and instrumental noise we derive a matched filter and then convolve
it with the ${\it Planck}$ foreground-cleaned `${\tt 2D-ILC\,}$' maps. By using
the Meta Catalogue of X-ray detected Clusters of galaxies (MCXC), we determine
the normalized ${\it rms}$ dispersion of the temperature fluctuations at the
positions of clusters, finding that this shows excess variance compared with
the noise expectation. We then build an unbiased statistical estimator of the
signal, determining that the normalized mean temperature dispersion of $1526$
clusters is $\langle \left(\Delta T/T \right)^{2} \rangle = (1.64 \pm 0.48)
\times 10^{-11}$. However, comparison with analytic calculations and
simulations suggest that around $0.7\,\sigma$ of this result is due to cluster
lensing rather than the kSZ effect. By correcting this, the temperature
dispersion is measured to be $\langle \left(\Delta T/T \right)^{2} \rangle =
(1.35 \pm 0.48) \times 10^{-11}$, which gives a detection at the $2.8\,\sigma$
level. We further convert uniform-weight temperature dispersion into a
measurement of the line-of-sight velocity dispersion, by using estimates of the
optical depth of each cluster (which introduces additional uncertainty into the
estimate). We find that the velocity dispersion is $\langle v^{2} \rangle
=(123\,000 \pm 71\,000)\,({\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1})^{2}$, which is consistent
with findings from other large-scale structure studies, and provides direct
evidence of statistical homogeneity on scales of $600\,h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$. Our
study shows the promise of using cross-correlations of the kSZ effect with
large-scale structure in order to constrain the growth of structure.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06207 [pdf] - 1717310
Planck 2018 results. III. High Frequency Instrument data processing and
frequency maps
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Roudier, G.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17
This paper presents the High Frequency Instrument (HFI) data processing
procedures for the Planck 2018 release. Major improvements in mapmaking have
been achieved since the previous 2015 release. They enabled the first
significant measurement of the reionization optical depth parameter using HFI
data. This paper presents an extensive analysis of systematic effects,
including the use of simulations to facilitate their removal and characterize
the residuals. The polarized data, which presented a number of known problems
in the 2015 Planck release, are very significantly improved. Calibration, based
on the CMB dipole, is now extremely accurate and in the frequency range 100 to
353 GHz reduces intensity-to-polarization leakage caused by calibration
mismatch. The Solar dipole direction has been determined in the three lowest
HFI frequency channels to within one arc minute, and its amplitude has an
absolute uncertainty smaller than $0.35\mu$K, an accuracy of order $10^{-4}$.
This is a major legacy from the HFI for future CMB experiments. The removal of
bandpass leakage has been improved by extracting the bandpass-mismatch
coefficients for each detector as part of the mapmaking process; these values
in turn improve the intensity maps. This is a major change in the philosophy of
"frequency maps", which are now computed from single detector data, all
adjusted to the same average bandpass response for the main foregrounds.
Simulations reproduce very well the relative gain calibration of detectors, as
well as drifts within a frequency induced by the residuals of the main
systematic effect. Using these simulations, we measure and correct the small
frequency calibration bias induced by this systematic effect at the $10^{-4}$
level. There is no detectable sign of a residual calibration bias between the
first and second acoustic peaks in the CMB channels, at the $10^{-3}$ level.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1505.07707 [pdf] - 1716919
Type Ia supernova Hubble diagram with near-infrared and optical
observations
Stanishev, V.;
Goobar, A.;
Amanullah, R.;
Bassett, B.;
Fantaye, Y. T.;
Garnavich, P.;
Hlozek, R.;
Nordin, J.;
Okouma, P. M.;
Ostman, L.;
Sako, M.;
Scalzo, R.;
Smith, M.
Submitted: 2015-05-28, last modified: 2018-03-23
We main goal of this paper is to test whether the NIR peak magnitudes of SNe
Ia could be accurately estimated with only a single observation obtained close
to maximum light, provided the time of B band maximum and the optical stretch
parameter are known. We obtained multi-epoch UBVRI and single-epoch J and H
photometric observations of 16 SNe Ia in the redshift range z=0.037-0.183,
doubling the leverage of the current SN Ia NIR Hubble diagram and the number of
SNe beyond redshift 0.04. This sample was analyzed together with 102 NIR and
458 optical light curves (LCs) of normal SNe Ia from the literature. The
analysis of 45 well-sampled NIR LCs shows that a single template accurately
describes them if its time axis is stretched with the optical stretch
parameter. This allows us to estimate the NIR peak magnitudes even with one
observation obtained within 10 days from B-band maximum. We find that the NIR
Hubble residuals show weak correlation with DM_15 and E(B-V), and for the first
time we report a possible dependence on the J_max-H_max color. The intrinsic
NIR luminosity scatter of SNe Ia is estimated to be around 0.10 mag, which is
smaller than what can be derived for a similarly heterogeneous sample at
optical wavelengths. In conclusion, we find that SNe Ia are at least as good
standard candles in the NIR as in the optical. We showed that it is feasible to
extended the NIR SN Ia Hubble diagram to z=0.2 with very modest sampling of the
NIR LCs, if complemented by well-sampled optical LCs. Our results suggest that
the most efficient way to extend the NIR Hubble diagram to high redshift would
be to obtain a single observation close to the NIR maximum. (abridged)
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.03467 [pdf] - 1582495
No evidence for extensions to the standard cosmological model
Submitted: 2017-04-11, last modified: 2017-08-09
We compute the Bayesian Evidence for models considered in the main analysis
of Planck cosmic microwave background data. By utilising carefully-defined
nearest-neighbour distances in parameter space, we reuse the Monte Carlo Markov
Chains already produced for parameter inference to compute Bayes factors $B$
for many different model-dataset combinations. Standard 6-parameter flat
$\Lambda$CDM model is favoured over all other models considered, with curvature
being mildly favoured only when CMB lensing is not included. Many alternative
models are strongly disfavoured by the data, including primordial correlated
isocurvature models ($\ln B=-7.8$), non-zero scalar-to-tensor ratio ($\ln
B=-4.3$), running of the spectral index ($\ln B = -4.7$), curvature ($\ln
B=-3.6$), non-standard numbers of neutrinos ($\ln B=-3.1$), non-standard
neutrino masses ($\ln B=-3.2$), non-standard lensing potential ($\ln B=-4.6$),
evolving dark energy ($\ln B=-3.2$), sterile neutrinos ($\ln B=-6.9$), and
extra sterile neutrinos with a non-zero scalar-to-tensor ratio ($\ln B=-10.8$).
Other models are less strongly disfavoured with respect to flat $\Lambda$CDM.
As with all analyses based on Bayesian Evidence, the final numbers depend on
the widths of the parameter priors. We adopt the priors used in the Planck
analysis, while performing a prior sensitivity analysis. Our quantitative
conclusion is that extensions beyond the standard cosmological model are
disfavoured by Planck data. Only when newer Hubble constant measurements are
included does $\Lambda$CDM become disfavoured, and only mildly, compared with a
dynamical dark energy model ($\ln B\sim +2$).
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.02487 [pdf] - 1580129
Planck intermediate results. LI. Features in the cosmic microwave
background temperature power spectrum and shifts in cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Narimani, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-08-08, last modified: 2017-04-21
The six parameters of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model have best-fit values
derived from the Planck temperature power spectrum that are shifted somewhat
from the best-fit values derived from WMAP data. These shifts are driven by
features in the Planck temperature power spectrum at angular scales that had
never before been measured to cosmic-variance level precision. We investigate
these shifts to determine whether they are within the range of expectation and
to understand their origin in the data. Taking our parameter set to be the
optical depth of the reionized intergalactic medium $\tau$, the baryon density
$\omega_{\rm b}$, the matter density $\omega_{\rm m}$, the angular size of the
sound horizon $\theta_*$, the spectral index of the primordial power spectrum,
$n_{\rm s}$, and $A_{\rm s}e^{-2\tau}$ (where $A_{\rm s}$ is the amplitude of
the primordial power spectrum), we examine the change in best-fit values
between a WMAP-like large angular-scale data set (with multipole moment
$\ell<800$ in the Planck temperature power spectrum) and an all angular-scale
data set ($\ell<2500$ Planck temperature power spectrum), each with a prior on
$\tau$ of $0.07\pm0.02$. We find that the shifts, in units of the 1$\sigma$
expected dispersion for each parameter, are $\{\Delta \tau, \Delta A_{\rm s}
e^{-2\tau}, \Delta n_{\rm s}, \Delta \omega_{\rm m}, \Delta \omega_{\rm b},
\Delta \theta_*\} = \{-1.7, -2.2, 1.2, -2.0, 1.1, 0.9\}$, with a $\chi^2$ value
of 8.0. We find that this $\chi^2$ value is exceeded in 15% of our simulated
data sets, and that a parameter deviates by more than 2.2$\sigma$ in 9% of
simulated data sets, meaning that the shifts are not unusually large. Comparing
$\ell<800$ instead to $\ell>800$, or splitting at a different multipole, yields
similar results. We examine the $\ell<800$ model residuals in the $\ell>800$
power spectrum data and find that the features there... [abridged]
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.03472 [pdf] - 1562206
Marginal Likelihoods from Monte Carlo Markov Chains
Submitted: 2017-04-11
In this paper, we present a method for computing the marginal likelihood,
also known as the model likelihood or Bayesian evidence, from Markov Chain
Monte Carlo (MCMC), or other sampled posterior distributions. In order to do
this, one needs to be able to estimate the density of points in parameter
space, and this can be challenging in high numbers of dimensions. Here we
present a Bayesian analysis, where we obtain the posterior for the marginal
likelihood, using $k$th nearest-neighbour distances in parameter space, using
the Mahalanobis distance metric, under the assumption that the points in the
chain (thinned if required) are independent. We generalise the algorithm to
apply to importance-sampled chains, where each point is assigned a weight. We
illustrate this with an idealised posterior of known form with an analytic
marginal likelihood, and show that for chains of length $\sim 10^5$ points, the
technique is effective for parameter spaces with up to $\sim 20$ dimensions. We
also argue that $k=1$ is the optimal choice, and discuss failure modes for the
algorithm. In a companion paper (Heavens et al. 2017) we apply the technique to
the main MCMC chains from the 2015 Planck analysis of cosmic background
radiation data, to infer that quantitatively the simplest 6-parameter flat
$\Lambda$CDM standard model of cosmology is preferred over all extensions
considered.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.07151 [pdf] - 1593486
Planck intermediate results. LII. Planet flux densities
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lellouch, E.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.
Submitted: 2016-12-21
Measurements of flux density are described for five planets, Mars, Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, across the six Planck High Frequency Instrument
frequency bands (100-857 GHz) and these are then compared with models and
existing data. In our analysis, we have also included estimates of the
brightness of Jupiter and Saturn at the three frequencies of the Planck Low
Frequency Instrument (30, 44, and 70 GHz). The results provide constraints on
the intrinsic brightness and the brightness time-variability of these planets.
The majority of the planet flux density estimates are limited by systematic
errors, but still yield better than 1% measurements in many cases. Applying
data from Planck HFI, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), and the
Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) to a model that incorporates contributions
from Saturn's rings to the planet's total flux density suggests a best fit
value for the spectral index of Saturn's ring system of $\beta _\mathrm{ring} =
2.30\pm0.03$ over the 30-1000 GHz frequency range. The average ratio between
the Planck-HFI measurements and the adopted model predictions for all five
planets (excluding Jupiter observations for 353 GHz) is 0.997, 0.997, 1.018,
and 1.032 for 100, 143, 217, and 353 GHz, respectively. Model predictions for
planet thermodynamic temperatures are therefore consistent with the absolute
calibration of Planck-HFI detectors at about the three-percent-level. We
compare our measurements with published results from recent cosmic microwave
background experiments. In particular, we observe that the flux densities
measured by Planck HFI and WMAP agree to within 2%. These results allow
experiments operating in the mm-wavelength range to cross-calibrate against
Planck and improve models of radiative transport used in planetary science.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.03507 [pdf] - 1530686
Planck intermediate results. XLVII. Planck constraints on reionization
history
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Ili_, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirri, G.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-11, last modified: 2016-09-05
We investigate constraints on cosmic reionization extracted from the Planck
cosmic microwave background (CMB) data. We combine the Planck CMB anisotropy
data in temperature with the low-multipole polarization data to fit LCDM models
with various parameterizations of the reionization history. We obtain a Thomson
optical depth tau=0.058 +/- 0.012 for the commonly adopted instantaneous
reionization model. This confirms, with only data from CMB anisotropies, the
low value suggested by combining Planck 2015 results with other data sets and
also reduces the uncertainties. We reconstruct the history of the ionization
fraction using either a symmetric or an asymmetric model for the transition
between the neutral and ionized phases. To determine better constraints on the
duration of the reionization process, we also make use of measurements of the
amplitude of the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich (kSZ) effect using additional
information from the high resolution Atacama Cosmology Telescope and South Pole
Telescope experiments. The average redshift at which reionization occurs is
found to lie between z=7.8 and 8.8, depending on the model of reionization
adopted. Using kSZ constraints and a redshift-symmetric reionization model, we
find an upper limit to the width of the reionization period of Dz < 2.8. In all
cases, we find that the Universe is ionized at less than the 10% level at
redshifts above z~10. This suggests that an early onset of reionization is
strongly disfavoured by the Planck data. We show that this result also reduces
the tension between CMB-based analyses and constraints from other astrophysical
sources.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.09387 [pdf] - 1530762
Planck intermediate results. XLVIII. Disentangling Galactic dust
emission and cosmic infrared background anisotropies
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Soler, J. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-30, last modified: 2016-08-09
Using the Planck 2015 data release (PR2) temperature maps, we separate
Galactic thermal dust emission from cosmic infrared background (CIB)
anisotropies. For this purpose, we implement a specifically tailored
component-separation method, the so-called generalized needlet internal linear
combination (GNILC) method, which uses spatial information (the angular power
spectra) to disentangle the Galactic dust emission and CIB anisotropies. We
produce significantly improved all-sky maps of Planck thermal dust emission,
with reduced CIB contamination, at 353, 545, and 857 GHz. By reducing the CIB
contamination of the thermal dust maps, we provide more accurate estimates of
the local dust temperature and dust spectral index over the sky with reduced
dispersion, especially at high Galactic latitudes above $b = \pm 20{\deg}$. We
find that the dust temperature is $T = (19.4 \pm 1.3)$ K and the dust spectral
index is $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.1$ averaged over the whole sky, while $T = (19.4
\pm 1.5)$ K and $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.2$ on 21 % of the sky at high latitudes.
Moreover, subtracting the new CIB-removed thermal dust maps from the
CMB-removed Planck maps gives access to the CIB anisotropies over 60 % of the
sky at Galactic latitudes $|b| > 20{\deg}$. Because they are a significant
improvement over previous Planck products, the GNILC maps are recommended for
thermal dust science. The new CIB maps can be regarded as indirect tracers of
the dark matter and they are recommended for exploring cross-correlations with
lensing and large-scale structure optical surveys. The reconstructed GNILC
thermal dust and CIB maps are delivered as Planck products.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.08633 [pdf] - 1530749
Planck intermediate results. XLIX. Parity-violation constraints from
polarization data
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-27, last modified: 2016-08-05
Parity violating extensions of the standard electromagnetic theory cause in
vacuo rotation of the plane of polarization of propagating photons. This
effect, also known as cosmic birefringence, impacts the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) anisotropy angular power spectra, producing non-vanishing
$T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ correlations that are otherwise null when parity is a
symmetry. Here we present new constraints on an isotropic rotation,
parametrized by the angle $\alpha$, derived from Planck 2015 CMB polarization
data. To increase the robustness of our analyses, we employ two complementary
approaches, in harmonic space and in map space, the latter based on a peak
stacking technique. The two approaches provide estimates for $\alpha$ that are
in agreement within statistical uncertainties and very stable against several
consistency tests. Considering the $T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ information jointly,
we find $\alpha = 0.31^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm
0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm syst.})$ from the harmonic analysis and $\alpha =
0.35^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm 0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm
syst.})$ from the stacking approach. These constraints are compatible with no
parity violation and are dominated by the systematic uncertainty in the
orientation of Planck's polarization-sensitive bolometers.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.06810 [pdf] - 1935274
Exploring the spectroscopic diversity of type Ia supernovae with
DRACULA: a machine learning approach
Sasdelli, Michele;
Ishida, E. E. O.;
Vilalta, R.;
Aguena, M.;
Busti, V. C.;
Camacho, H.;
Trindade, A. M. M.;
Gieseke, F.;
de Souza, R. S.;
Fantaye, Y. T.;
Mazzali, P. A.
Submitted: 2015-12-21, last modified: 2016-06-30
The existence of multiple subclasses of type Ia supernovae (SNeIa) has been
the subject of great debate in the last decade. One major challenge inevitably
met when trying to infer the existence of one or more subclasses is the time
consuming, and subjective, process of subclass definition. In this work, we
show how machine learning tools facilitate identification of subtypes of SNeIa
through the establishment of a hierarchical group structure in the continuous
space of spectral diversity formed by these objects. Using Deep Learning, we
were capable of performing such identification in a 4 dimensional feature space
(+1 for time evolution), while the standard Principal Component Analysis barely
achieves similar results using 15 principal components. This is evidence that
the progenitor system and the explosion mechanism can be described by a small
number of initial physical parameters. As a proof of concept, we show that our
results are in close agreement with a previously suggested classification
scheme and that our proposed method can grasp the main spectral features behind
the definition of such subtypes. This allows the confirmation of the velocity
of lines as a first order effect in the determination of SNIa subtypes,
followed by 91bg-like events. Given the expected data deluge in the forthcoming
years, our proposed approach is essential to allow a quick and statistically
coherent identification of SNeIa subtypes (and outliers). All tools used in
this work were made publicly available in the Python package Dimensionality
Reduction And Clustering for Unsupervised Learning in Astronomy (DRACULA) and
can be found within COINtoolbox (https://github.com/COINtoolbox/DRACULA).
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.07335 [pdf] - 1538905
Planck intermediate results. L. Evidence for spatial variation of the
polarized thermal dust spectral energy distribution and implications for CMB
$B$-mode analysis
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-06-23
The characterization of the Galactic foregrounds has been shown to be the
main obstacle in the challenging quest to detect primordial B-modes in the
polarized microwave sky. We make use of the Planck-HFI 2015 data release at
high frequencies to place new constraints on the properties of the polarized
thermal dust emission at high Galactic latitudes. Here, we specifically study
the spatial variability of the dust polarized spectral energy distribution, and
its potential impact on the determination of the tensor-to-scalar ratio. We use
the correlation ratio of the $C_\ell^{BB}$ angular power spectra between the
217- and 353-GHz channels as a tracer of these potential variations, computed
on different high Galactic latitude regions, ranging from 80% to 20% of the
sky. The new insight from Planck data is a departure of the correlation ratio
from unity that cannot be attributed to a spurious decorrelation due to the
cosmic microwave background, instrumental noise, or instrumental systematics.
The effect is marginally detected on each region, but the statistical
combination of all the regions gives more than 99% confidence for this
variation in polarized dust properties. In addition, we show that the
decorrelation increases when there is a decrease in the mean column density of
the region of the sky being considered, and we propose a simple power-law
empirical model for this dependence, which matches what is seen in the Planck
data. We explore the effect that this measured decorrelation has on simulations
of the BICEP2-Keck Array/Planck analysis and show that the 2015 constraints
from those data still allow a decorrelation between the dust at 150 and 353GHz
of the order of the one we measure. Finally we show that either spatial
variation of the dust SED or of the dust polarization angle could produce
decorrelations between 217- and 353-GHz data similar to those we observe in the
data.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.02985 [pdf] - 1530681
Planck intermediate results. XLVI. Reduction of large-scale systematic
effects in HFI polarization maps and estimation of the reionization optical
depth
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Ilic, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirri, G.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-10, last modified: 2016-05-26
This paper describes the identification, modelling, and removal of previously
unexplained systematic effects in the polarization data of the Planck High
Frequency Instrument (HFI) on large angular scales, including new mapmaking and
calibration procedures, new and more complete end-to-end simulations, and a set
of robust internal consistency checks on the resulting maps. These maps, at
100, 143, 217, and 353 GHz, are early versions of those that will be released
in final form later in 2016.
The improvements allow us to determine the cosmic reionization optical depth
$\tau$ using, for the first time, the low-multipole $EE$ data from HFI,
reducing significantly the central value and uncertainty, and hence the upper
limit. Two different likelihood procedures are used to constrain $\tau$ from
two estimators of the CMB $E$- and $B$-mode angular power spectra at 100 and
143 GHz, after debiasing the spectra from a small remaining systematic
contamination. These all give fully consistent results.
A further consistency test is performed using cross-correlations derived from
the Low Frequency Instrument maps of the Planck 2015 data release and the new
HFI data. For this purpose, end-to-end analyses of systematic effects from the
two instruments are used to demonstrate the near independence of their dominant
systematic error residuals.
The tightest result comes from the HFI-based $\tau$ posterior distribution
using the maximum likelihood power spectrum estimator from $EE$ data only,
giving a value $0.055\pm 0.009$. In a companion paper these results are
discussed in the context of the best-fit Planck $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model
and recent models of reionization.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.01029 [pdf] - 1530576
Planck intermediate results. XLIV. The structure of the Galactic
magnetic field from dust polarization maps of the southern Galactic cap
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arzoumanian, D.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Ferrière, K.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Guillet, V.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Neveu, J.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oppermann, N.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Soler, J. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-04-04
We study the statistical properties of interstellar dust polarization at high
Galactic latitude, using the Stokes parameter Planck maps at 353 GHz. Our aim
is to advance the understanding of the magnetized interstellar medium (ISM),
and to provide a model of the polarized dust foreground for cosmic microwave
background component-separation procedures. Focusing on the southern Galactic
cap, we examine the statistical distributions of the polarization fraction
($p$) and angle ($\psi$) to characterize the ordered and turbulent components
of the Galactic magnetic field (GMF) in the solar neighbourhood. We relate
patterns at large angular scales in polarization to the orientation of the mean
(ordered) GMF towards Galactic coordinates $(l_0,b_0)=(70^\circ \pm
5^\circ,24^\circ \pm 5^\circ)$. The histogram of $p$ shows a wide dispersion up
to 25 %. The histogram of $\psi$ has a standard deviation of $12^\circ$ about
the regular pattern expected from the ordered GMF. We use these histograms to
build a phenomenological model of the turbulent component of the GMF, assuming
a uniform effective polarization fraction ($p_0$) of dust emission. To model
the Stokes parameters, we approximate the integration along the line of sight
(LOS) as a sum over a set of $N$ independent polarization layers, in each of
which the turbulent component of the GMF is obtained from Gaussian realizations
of a power-law power spectrum. We are able to reproduce the observed $p$ and
$\psi$ distributions using: a $p_0$ value of (26 $\pm$ 3)%; a ratio of 0.9
$\pm$ 0.1 between the strengths of the turbulent and mean components of the
GMF; and a small value of $N$. We relate the polarization layers to the density
structure and to the correlation length of the GMF along the LOS.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.07135 [pdf] - 1483209
Planck 2015 results. XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Aluri, P. K.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Pant, N.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-06-23, last modified: 2016-01-22
We test the statistical isotropy and Gaussianity of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) anisotropies using observations made by the Planck satellite.
Our results are based mainly on the full Planck mission for temperature, but
also include some polarization measurements.
In particular, we consider the CMB anisotropy maps derived from the
multi-frequency Planck data by several component-separation methods. For the
temperature anisotropies, we find excellent agreement between results based on
these sky maps over both a very large fraction of the sky and a broad range of
angular scales, establishing that potential foreground residuals do not affect
our studies.
Tests of skewness, kurtosis, multi-normality, N-point functions, and
Minkowski functionals indicate consistency with Gaussianity, while a power
deficit at large angular scales is manifested in several ways, for example low
map variance. The results of a peak statistics analysis are consistent with the
expectations of a Gaussian random field. The "Cold Spot" is detected with
several methods, including map kurtosis, peak statistics, and mean temperature
profile. We thoroughly probe the large-scale dipolar power asymmetry, detecting
it with several independent tests, and address the subject of a posteriori
correction. Tests of directionality suggest the presence of angular clustering
from large to small scales, but at a significance that is dependent on the
details of the approach. We perform the first examination of polarization data,
finding the morphology of stacked peaks to be consistent with the expectations
of statistically isotropic simulations. Where they overlap, these results are
consistent with the Planck 2013 analysis based on the nominal mission data and
provide our most thorough view of the statistics of the CMB fluctuations to
date.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.2593 [pdf] - 1287437
Observational Constraints on Redshift Remapping
Submitted: 2013-12-09, last modified: 2015-10-04
There are two redshifts in cosmology: $z_{obs}$, the observed redshift
computed via spectral lines, and the model redshift, $z$, defined by the
effective FLRW scale factor. In general these do not coincide. We place
observational constraints on the allowed distortions of $z$ away from $z_{obs}$
- a possibility we dub redshift remapping. Remapping is degenerate with cosmic
dynamics for either $d_L(z)$ or $H(z)$ observations alone: for example, the
simple remapping $z = \alpha_1 z_{obs} +\alpha_2 z_{obs}^2$ allows a
decelerating Einstein de Sitter universe to fit the observed supernova Hubble
diagram as successfully as $\Lambda$CDM, highlighting that supernova data alone
cannot prove that the universe is accelerating. We show however, that redshift
remapping leads to apparent violations of cosmic distance duality that can be
used to detect its presence even when neither a specific theory of gravity nor
the Copernican Principle are assumed. Combining current data sets favours
acceleration but does not yet rule out redshift remapping as an alternative to
dark energy. Future surveys, however, will provide exquisite constraints on
remapping and any models -- such as backreaction -- that predict it.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01582 [pdf] - 1486774
Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P. R. M.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Feeney, S.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Florido, E.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jin, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Müenchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nastasi, A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamaie, M.;
Oppermann, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Pelkonen, V. -M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rumsey, C.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanghera, H. S.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Sauvé, A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schammel, M. P.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shimwell, T. W.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Smith, K.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Stern, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Strong, A. W.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Troja, A.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vidal, M.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Walter, B.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2015-08-09
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early
Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14~May 2009 and scanned the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12~August 2009 and
23~October 2013. In February~2015, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released
the second set of cosmology products based on data from the entire Planck
mission, including both temperature and polarization, along with a set of
scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This
paper gives an overview of the main characteristics of the data and the data
products in the release, as well as the associated cosmological and
astrophysical science results and papers. The science products include maps of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect,
and diffuse foregrounds in temperature and polarization, catalogues of compact
Galactic and extragalactic sources (including separate catalogues of
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters and Galactic cold clumps), and extensive simulations
of signals and noise used in assessing the performance of the analysis methods
and assessment of uncertainties. The likelihood code used to assess
cosmological models against the Planck data are described, as well as a CMB
lensing likelihood. Scientific results include cosmological parameters deriving
from CMB power spectra, gravitational lensing, and cluster counts, as well as
constraints on inflation, non-Gaussianity, primordial magnetic fields, dark
energy, and modified gravity.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.05956 [pdf] - 1486782
Planck 2015 results. IX. Diffuse component separation: CMB maps
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-20
We present foreground-reduced CMB maps derived from the full Planck data set
in both temperature and polarization. Compared to the corresponding Planck 2013
temperature sky maps, the total data volume is larger by a factor of 3.2 for
frequencies between 30 and 70 GHz, and by 1.9 for frequencies between 100 and
857 GHz. In addition, systematic errors in the forms of
temperature-to-polarization leakage, analogue-to-digital conversion
uncertainties, and very long time constant errors have been dramatically
reduced, to the extent that the cosmological polarization signal may now be
robustly recovered on angular scales $\ell\gtrsim40$. On the very largest
scales, instrumental systematic residuals are still non-negligible compared to
the expected cosmological signal, and modes with $\ell < 20$ are accordingly
suppressed in the current polarization maps by high-pass filtering. As in 2013,
four different CMB component separation algorithms are applied to these
observations, providing a measure of stability with respect to algorithmic and
modelling choices. The resulting polarization maps have rms instrumental noise
ranging between 0.21 and 0.27$\,\mu\textrm{K}$ averaged over 55 arcmin pixels,
and between 4.5 and 6.1$\,\mu\textrm{K}$ averaged over 3.4 arcmin pixels. The
cosmological parameters derived from the analysis of temperature power spectra
are in agreement at the $1\sigma$ level with the Planck 2015 likelihood.
Unresolved mismatches between the noise properties of the data and simulations
prevent a satisfactory description of the higher-order statistical properties
of the polarization maps. Thus, the primary applications of these polarization
maps are those that do not require massive simulations for accurate estimation
of uncertainties, for instance estimation of cross-spectra and
cross-correlations, or stacking analyses.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.1114 [pdf] - 864270
Test of cosmic isotropy in the Planck era
Submitted: 2014-09-03
The two fundamental assumptions in cosmology are that the Universe is
statistically homogeneous and isotropic when averaged on large scales. Given
the big implication of these assumptions, there has been a lot of statistical
tests carried out to verify their validity. Since the first high-precision
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data release by the WMAP satellite, many
anomalies that challenges the isotropy assumption, including dipolar power
asymmetry on large angular scales, have been reported. In this talk I will
present a brief summary of the test of cosmic isotropy we carried out in the
latest WMAP and Planck temperature data.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.1095 [pdf] - 903607
A Simple Proposal for Radial 3D Needlets
Submitted: 2014-08-05
We present here a simple construction of a wavelet system for the
three-dimensional ball, which we label \emph{Radial 3D Needlets}. The
construction envisages a data collection environment where an observer located
at the centre of the ball is surrounded by concentric spheres with the same
pixelization at different radial distances, for any given resolution. The
system is then obtained by weighting the projector operator built on the
corresponding set of eigenfunctions, and performing a discretization step which
turns out to be computationally very convenient. The resulting wavelets can be
shown to have very good localization properties in the real and harmonic
domain; their implementation is computationally very convenient, and they allow
for exact reconstruction as they form a tight frame systems. Our theoretical
results are supported by an extensive numerical analysis.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.5420 [pdf] - 959492
Cosmological Applications of the Gaussian Kinematic Formula
Submitted: 2014-06-20
The Gaussian Kinematic Formula (GKF, see Adler and Taylor (2007,2011)) is an
extremely powerful tool allowing for explicit analytic predictions of expected
values of Minkowski functionals under realistic experimental conditions for
cosmological data collections. In this paper, we implement Minkowski
functionals on multipoles and needlet components of CMB fields, thus allowing a
better control of cosmic variance and extraction of information on both
harmonic and real domains; we then exploit the GKF to provide their expected
values on spherical maps, in the presence of arbitrary sky masks, and under
nonGaussian circumstances. All our results are validated by numerical
experiments, which show a perfect agreement between theoretical predictions and
Monte Carlo simulations.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5062 [pdf] - 832330
Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Aussel, H.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Barrena, R.;
Bartelmann, M.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bethermin, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bikmaev, I.;
Blanchard, A.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Böhringer, H.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bourdin, H.;
Bowyer, J. W.;
Bridges, M.;
Brown, M. L.;
Bucher, M.;
Burenin, R.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cappellini, B.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carr, R.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casale, M.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chen, X.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Chon, G.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Churazov, E.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Da Silva, A.;
Dahle, H.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Déchelette, T.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Démoclès, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dick, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fabre, O.;
Falgarone, E.;
Falvella, M. C.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Filliard, C.;
Finelli, F.;
Flores-Cacho, I.;
Foley, S.;
Forni, O.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Freschi, M.;
Fromenteau, S.;
Frommert, M.;
Gaier, T. C.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gallegos, J.;
Galli, S.;
Gandolfo, B.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Gilfanov, M.;
Girard, D.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Haissinski, J.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hansen, M.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Hempel, A.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Ho, S.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hou, Z.;
Hovest, W.;
Huey, G.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jasche, J.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Kalberla, P.;
Kangaslahti, P.;
Keihänen, E.;
Kerp, J.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Khamitov, I.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lavabre, A.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leach, S.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Leroy, C.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lewis, A.;
Li, C.;
Liddle, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lowe, S.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
MacTavish, C. J.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Marleau, F.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matsumura, T.;
Matthai, F.;
Maurin, L.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McDonald, A.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Menegoni, E.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Millea, M.;
Miniscalco, R.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Morisset, N.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Nesvadba, N. P. H.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
North, C.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
O'Dwyer, I. J.;
Orieux, F.;
Osborne, S.;
O'Sullivan, C.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Paykari, P.;
Pearson, D.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Platania, P.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Pullen, A. R.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Rahlin, A.;
Räth, C.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Riazuelo, A.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ringeval, C.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Robbers, G.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salerno, E.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanselme, L.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schiavon, F.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Smith, K.;
Smoot, G. F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Torre, J. -P.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Tuttlebee, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vibert, L.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, C.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Winkel, B.;
Xia, J. -Q.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-06-05
The ESA's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early Universe and its
subsequent evolution, was launched 14 May 2009 and has been scanning the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously since 12 August 2009. This paper
gives an overview of the mission and its performance, the processing, analysis,
and characteristics of the data, the scientific results, and the science data
products and papers in the release. The science products include maps of the
CMB and diffuse extragalactic foregrounds, a catalogue of compact Galactic and
extragalactic sources, and a list of sources detected through the SZ effect.
The likelihood code used to assess cosmological models against the Planck data
and a lensing likelihood are described. Scientific results include robust
support for the standard six-parameter LCDM model of cosmology and improved
measurements of its parameters, including a highly significant deviation from
scale invariance of the primordial power spectrum. The Planck values for these
parameters and others derived from them are significantly different from those
previously determined. Several large-scale anomalies in the temperature
distribution of the CMB, first detected by WMAP, are confirmed with higher
confidence. Planck sets new limits on the number and mass of neutrinos, and has
measured gravitational lensing of CMB anisotropies at greater than 25 sigma.
Planck finds no evidence for non-Gaussianity in the CMB. Planck's results agree
well with results from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. Planck
finds a lower Hubble constant than found in some more local measures. Some
tension is also present between the amplitude of matter fluctuations derived
from CMB data and that derived from SZ data. The Planck and WMAP power spectra
are offset from each other by an average level of about 2% around the first
acoustic peak.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.0870 [pdf] - 800746
Power asymmetry in WMAP and Planck temperature sky maps as measured by a
local variance estimator
Submitted: 2014-02-04, last modified: 2014-03-24
We revisit the question of hemispherical power asymmetry in the WMAP and
Planck temperature sky maps by measuring the local variance over the sky and on
disks of various sizes. For the 2013 Planck sky map we find that none of the
1000 available isotropic Planck "Full Focal Plane" simulations have a larger
variance asymmetry than that estimated from the data, suggesting the presence
of an anisotropic signature formally significant at least at the $3.3\sigma$
level. For the WMAP 9-year data we find that 5 out of 1000 simulations have a
larger asymmetry. The preferred direction for the asymmetry from the Planck
data is $(l,b)=(212^\circ,-13^\circ)$, in good agreement with previous reports
of the same hemispherical power asymmetry.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.7112 [pdf] - 790769
N-body lensed CMB maps: lensing extraction and characterization
Submitted: 2013-11-27, last modified: 2014-03-02
We reconstruct shear maps and angular power spectra from simulated weakly
lensed total intensity (TT) and polarised (EB) maps of the Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB) anisotropies, obtained using Born approximated ray-tracing
through the N-body simulated Cold Dark Matter (CDM) structures in the
Millennium Simulations (MS). We compare the recovered signal with the
$\Lambda$CDM prediction, on the whole interval of angular scales which is
allowed by the finite box size, extending from the degree scale to the
arcminute, by applying a quadratic estimator in the flat sky limit; we consider
PRISM-like instrumental specification for future generation CMB satellites,
corresponding to arcminute angular resolution of 3.2' and sensitivity of 2.43
${\mu}$K-arcmin. -arcmin. The noise bias in the simulations closely follows the
estimator prediction, becoming dominated by limits in the angular resolution
for the EB signal, at l${\simeq}$1500. The de-biased signal shows no visible
departure from predictions of the weak lensing power within uncertainties, when
considering TT and EB data singularly. In particular, the reconstruction
precision reaches the level of a few percent in bins with $\Delta$l
${\simeq}$100 in the angular multiple interval 1000<l<2000 for TT, and about
10$%$ for EB. Within the adopted specifications, polarisation data do represent
a significant contribution to the lensing shear, which appear to faithfully
trace the underlying N-body structure down to the smallest angular scales
achievable with the present setup, validating at the same time the latter with
respect to semi-analytical predictions from ${\Lambda}$CDM cosmology at the
level of CMB lensing statistics. This work demonstrates the feasibility of CMB
lensing studies based on large scale simulations of cosmological structure
formation in the context of the current and future high resolution and
sensitivity CMB experiment.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5083 [pdf] - 1165435
Planck 2013 results. XXIII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Armitage-Caplan, C.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Atrio-Barandela, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bridges, M.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chiang, L. -Y;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frommert, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giardino, G.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hansen, M.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Laureijs, R. J.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Leroy, C.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Maris, M.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Matthai, F.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Osborne, S.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Poutanen, T.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Räth, C.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Varis, J.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-03-20, last modified: 2014-01-27
The two fundamental assumptions of the standard cosmological model - that the
initial fluctuations are statistically isotropic and Gaussian - are rigorously
tested using maps of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy from the
Planck satellite. Deviations from isotropy have been found and demonstrated to
be robust against component separation algorithm, mask choice and frequency
dependence. Many of these anomalies were previously observed in the WMAP data,
and are now confirmed at similar levels of significance (about 3 sigma).
However, we find little evidence for non-Gaussianity, with the exception of a
few statistical signatures that seem to be associated with specific anomalies.
In particular, we find that the quadrupole-octopole alignment is also connected
to a low observed variance of the CMB signal. A power asymmetry is now found to
persist to scales corresponding to about l=600, and can be described in the
low-l regime by a phenomenological dipole modulation model. However, any
primordial power asymmetry is strongly scale-dependent and does not extend to
arbitrarily small angular scales. Finally, it is plausible that some of these
features may be reflected in the angular power spectrum of the data, which
shows a deficit of power on similar scales. Indeed, when the power spectra of
two hemispheres defined by a preferred direction are considered separately, one
shows evidence for a deficit in power, while its opposite contains oscillations
between odd and even modes that may be related to the parity violation and
phase correlations also detected in the data. Although these analyses represent
a step forward in building an understanding of the anomalies, a satisfactory
explanation based on physically motivated models is still lacking.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.5371 [pdf] - 698699
Directional dependence of LCDM cosmological parameters
Submitted: 2013-03-21, last modified: 2013-07-26
We study hemispherical power asymmetry (Eriksen et. al. 2004, Hansen et. al.
2004, Hansen et. al. 2009) in the WMAP 9-year data. We analyse the combined V-
and W-band sky maps, after application of the KQ85 mask, and find that the
asymmetry is statistically significant at the 3.4sigma confidence level for
ell=2-600, where the data is signal dominated, with a preferred asymmetry
direction (l,b)=(227,-27). Individual asymmetry axes estimated from six
independent multipole ranges are all consistent with this direction.
Subsequently, we estimate cosmological parameters on different parts of the sky
and show that the parameters A_s, n_s and Omega_b are the most sensitive to
this power asymmetry. In particular, for the two opposite hemispheres aligned
with the preferred asymmetry axis, we find n_s = 0.959 \pm 0.022 and n_s =
0.989 \pm 0.024, respectively.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.3000 [pdf] - 635491
How Flat is Our Universe Really?
Submitted: 2012-07-12, last modified: 2013-02-28
Distance measurement provide no constraints on curvature independent of
assumptions about the dark energy, raising the question, how flat is our
Universe if we make no such assumptions? Allowing for general evolution of the
dark energy equation of state with 20 free parameters that are allowed to cross
the phantom divide, w(z) = -1, we show that while it is indeed possible to
match the first peak in the Cosmic Microwave Background with non-flat models
and arbitrary Hubble constant, H_0, the full WMAP7 and supernova data alone
imply -0.12 < \Omega_k < 0.01 (2\sigma). If we add an H_0 prior, this tightens
significantly to \Omega_k = 0.002 \pm 0.009 . These constitute the most
conservative and model-independent constraints on curvature available today,
and illustrate that the curvature-dynamics degeneracy is broken by current
data, with a key role played by the Integrated Sachs Wolfe effect rather than
the distance to the surface of last scattering. If one imposes a quintessence
prior on the dark energy (-1 \leq w(z) \leq 1) then just the WMAP7 and
supernova data alone force the Universe to near flatness: \Omega_k = 0.013 \pm
0.012. Finally, allowing for curvature, we find that all datasets are
consistent with a Harrison-Zel'dovich spectral index, n_s = 1, at 2\sigma,
illustrating the interplay between early and late-universe constraints.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.3960 [pdf] - 787648
Measuring primordial gravitational waves from CMB B-modes in cosmologies
with generalized expansion histories
Submitted: 2012-08-20, last modified: 2013-02-05
We evaluate our capability to constrain the abundance of primordial tensor
perturbations in cosmologies with generalized expansion histories in the epoch
of cosmic acceleration. Forthcoming satellite and sub-orbital experiments
probing polarization in the CMB are expected to measure the B-mode power in CMB
polarization, coming from PGWs on the degree scale, as well as gravitational
lensing on arcmin scales; the latter is the main competitor for the measurement
of PGWs, and is directly affected by the underlying expansion history,
determined by the presence of a DE component. In particular, we consider early
DE possible scenarios, in which the expansion history is substantially modified
at the epoch in which the CMB lensing is most relevant. We show that the
introduction of a parametrized DE may induce a variation as large as 30% in the
ratio of the power of lensing and PGWs on the degree scale. We find that
adopting the nominal specifications of upcoming satellite measurements the
constraining power on PGWs is weakened by the inclusion of the extra degrees of
freedom, resulting in a reduction of about 10% of the upper limits on r in
fiducial models with no GWs, as well as a comparable increase in the error bars
in models with non-zero r. Moreover, we find that the inclusion of sub-orbital
CMB experiments, capable of mapping the B-mode power up to the angular scales
affected by lensing, can restore the forecasted performances with a
cosmological constant. Finally, we show how the combination of CMB data with
Type Ia SNe, BAO and Hubble constant allows to constrain simultaneously r and
the DE quantities in the parametrization we consider, consisting of present
abundance and first redshift derivative of the energy density. We compare this
study with results obtained using the forecasted lensing potential measurement
precision from CMB satellite observations, finding consistent results.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.0508 [pdf] - 603541
CMB lensing reconstruction in the presence of diffuse polarized
foregrounds
Submitted: 2012-07-02, last modified: 2012-12-16
The measurement and characterization of the lensing of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) is key goal of the current and next generation of CMB
experiments. We perform a case study of a three-channel balloon-borne CMB
experiment observing the sky at (l,b)=(250deg,-38deg) and attaining a
sensitivity of 5.25 muK-arcmin with 8' angular resolution at 150 GHz, in order
to assess whether the effect of polarized Galactic dust is expected to be a
significant contaminant to the lensing signal reconstructed using the EB
quadratic estimator. We find that for our assumed dust model, polarization
fractions of about as low as a few percent may lead to a significant dust bias
to the lensing convergence power spectrum. We investigated a parametric
component separation method, proposed by Stompor et al. (2009), as well as a
template cleaning method, for mitigating the effect of this dust bias. The
template-based method recovers unbiased convergence power spectrum in all
polarization fraction cases we considered, while for the component separation
technique we find a dust contrast regime in which the accuracy of the profile
likelihood spectral index estimate breaks down, and in which external
information on the dust frequency scaling is needed. We propose a criterion for
putting a requirement on the accuracy with which the dust spectral index must
be estimated or constrained, and demonstrate that if this requirement is met,
then the dust bias can be removed.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:0906.0993 [pdf] - 493557
Fisher Matrix Preloaded -- Fisher4Cast
Submitted: 2009-06-04, last modified: 2012-03-28
The Fisher Matrix is the backbone of modern cosmological forecasting. We
describe the Fisher4Cast software: a general-purpose, easy-to-use, Fisher
Matrix framework. It is open source, rigorously designed and tested and
includes a Graphical User Interface (GUI) with automated LATEX file creation
capability and point-and-click Fisher ellipse generation. Fisher4Cast was
designed for ease of extension and, although written in Matlab, is easily
portable to open-source alternatives such as Octave and Scilab. Here we use
Fisher4Cast to present new 3-D and 4-D visualisations of the forecasting
landscape and to investigate the effects of growth and curvature on future
cosmological surveys. Early releases have been available at
http://www.cosmology.org.za since May 2008 with 750 downloads in the first
year. Version 2.2 is made public with this paper and includes a Quick Start
guide and the code used to produce the figures in this paper, in the hope that
it will be useful to the cosmology and wider scientific communities.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.1367 [pdf] - 392916
Estimating the tensor-to-scalar ratio and the effect of residual
foreground contamination
Submitted: 2011-04-07, last modified: 2011-07-28
We consider future balloon-borne and ground-based suborbital experiments
designed to search for inflationary gravitational waves, and investigate the
impact of residual foregrounds that remain in the estimated cosmic microwave
background maps. This is achieved by propagating foreground modelling
uncertainties from the component separation, under the assumption of a
spatially uniform foreground frequency scaling, through to the power spectrum
estimates, and up to measurement of the tensor to scalar ratio in the parameter
estimation step. We characterize the error covariance due to subtracted
foregrounds, and find it to be subdominant compared to instrumental noise and
sample variance in our simulated data analysis. We model the unsubtracted
residual foreground contribution using a two-parameter power law and show that
marginalization over these foreground parameters is effective in accounting for
a bias due to excess foreground power at low $\ell$. We conclude that, at least
in the suborbital experimental setups we have simulated, foreground errors may
be modeled and propagated up to parameter estimation with only a slight
degradation of the target sensitivity of these experiments derived neglecting
the presence of the foregrounds.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:0906.0974 [pdf] - 24954
Fisher4Cast Users' Manual
Submitted: 2009-06-04
This is the Users' Manual for the Fisher Matrix software Fisher4Cast and
covers installation, GUI help, command line basics, code flow and data
structure, as well as cosmological applications and extensions. Finally we
discuss the extensive tests performed on the software.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:0709.0526 [pdf] - 4570
Is the Dynamics of Tracking Dark Energy Detectable?
Submitted: 2007-09-04, last modified: 2008-08-05
We highlight the unexpected impact of nucleosynthesis and other early
universe constraints on the detectability of tracking quintessence dynamics at
late times, showing that such dynamics may well be invisible until the
unveiling of the Stage-IV dark energy experiments (DUNE, JDEM, LSST, SKA).
Nucleosynthesis forces |w'(0)| < 0.2 for the models we consider and strongly
limits potential deviations from LCDM. Surprisingly, the standard CPL
parametrisation, w(z) = w_0 + w_a z/(1+z), cannot match the nucleosynthesis
bound for minimally coupled tracking scalar fields. Given that such models are
arguably the best-motivated alternatives to a cosmological constant these
results may significantly impact future cosmological survey design and imply
that dark energy may well be dynamical even if we do not detect any dynamics in
the next decade.