Normalized to: Fabricius, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07325 [pdf] - 2099691
GaiaNIR: Combining optical and Near-Infra-Red (NIR) capabilities with
Time-Delay-Integration (TDI) sensors for a future Gaia-like mission
Hobbs, David;
Høg, Erik;
Mora, Alcione;
Crowley, Cian;
McMillan, Paul;
Ranalli, Piero;
Heiter, Ulrike;
Jordi, Carme;
Hambly, Nigel;
Church, Ross;
Anthony, Brown;
Tanga, Paolo;
Chemin, Laurent;
Portell, Jordi;
Jiménez-Esteban, Fran;
Klioner, Sergei;
Mignard, Francois;
Fynbo, Johan;
Wyrzykowski, Łukasz;
Rybicki, Krzysztof;
Anderson, Richard I.;
Cellino, Alberto;
Fabricius, Claus;
Davidson, Michael;
Lindegren, Lennart
Submitted: 2016-09-23, last modified: 2020-05-22
ESA recently called for new "Science Ideas" to be investigated in terms of
feasibility and technological developments -- for technologies not yet
sufficiently mature. These ideas may in the future become candidates for M or L
class missions within the ESA Science Program.
With the launch of Gaia in December 2013, Europe entered a new era of space
astrometry following in the footsteps of the very successful Hipparcos mission
from the early 1990s. Gaia is the successor to Hipparcos, both of which
operated in optical wavelengths, and Gaia is two orders of magnitude more
accurate in the five astrometric parameters and is surveying four orders of
magnitude more stars in a vast volume of the Milky Way. The combination of the
Hipparcos/Tycho-2 catalogues with the first early Gaia data release will give
improved proper motions over a long ~25 year baseline. The final Gaia solution
will also establish a new optical reference frame by means of quasars, by
linking the optical counterparts of radio (VLBI) sources defining the
orientation of the reference frame, and by using the zero proper motion of
quasars to determine a non-rotating frame.
A weakness of Gaia is that it only operates at optical wavelengths. However,
much of the Galactic centre and the spiral arm regions, important for certain
studies, are obscured by interstellar extinction and this makes it difficult
for Gaia to deeply probe. Traditionally, this problem is overcome by switching
to the infra-red but this was not possible with Gaia's CCDs. Additionally, to
scan the entire sky and make global absolute parallax measurements the
spacecraft must have a constant rotation and this requires that the CCDs
operate in TDI mode, increasing their complexity.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.02211 [pdf] - 2097293
Spectrophotometric calibration of low-resolution spectra
Submitted: 2020-01-07, last modified: 2020-05-11
Low-resolution spectroscopy is a frequently used technique. Aperture prism
spectroscopy in particular is an important tool for large-scale survey
observations. The ongoing ESA space mission Gaia is the currently most relevant
example. In this work we analyse the fundamental limitations of the calibration
of low-resolution spectrophotometric observations and introduce a calibration
method that avoids simplifying assumptions on the smearing effects of the line
spread functions. To this aim, we developed a functional analytic mathematical
formulation of the problem of spectrophotometric calibration. In this
formulation, the calibration process can be described as a linear mapping
between two suitably constructed Hilbert spaces, independently of the
resolution of the spectrophotometric instrument. The presented calibration
method can provide a formally unusual but precise calibration of low-resolution
spectrophotometry with non-negligible widths of line spread functions. We used
the Gaia spectrophotometric instruments to demonstrate that the calibration
method of this work can potentially provide a significantly better calibration
than methods neglecting the smearing effects of the line spread functions.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09368 [pdf] - 1732649
Gaia Data Release 2: Photometric content and validation
Evans, D. W.;
Riello, M.;
De Angeli, F.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Fabricius, C.;
Jordi, C.;
Palaversa, L.;
Diener, C.;
Busso, G.;
Cacciari, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-06-21
Aims. We describe the photometric content of the second data release of the
Gaia project (Gaia DR2) and its validation along with the quality of the data.
Methods. The validation was mainly carried out using an internal analysis of
the photometry. External comparisons were also made, but were limited by the
precision and systematics that may be present in the external catalogues used.
Results. In addition to the photometric quality assessment, we present the best
estimates of the three photometric passbands. Various colour-colour
transformations are also derived to enable the users to convert between the
Gaia and commonly used passbands. Conclusions. The internal analysis of the
data shows that the photometric calibrations can reach a precision as low as 2
mmag on individual CCD measurements. Other tests show that systematic effects
are present in the data at the 10 mmag level.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09367 [pdf] - 1736357
Gaia Data Release 2: processing of the photometric data
Riello, M.;
De Angeli, F.;
Evans, D. W.;
Busso, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Davidson, M.;
Burgess, P. W.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Osborne, P. J.;
Kewley, A.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Jordi, C.;
Cacciari, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Holland, G.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The second Gaia data release is based on 22 months of mission data with an
average of 0.9 billion individual CCD observations per day. A data volume of
this size and granularity requires a robust and reliable but still flexible
system to achieve the demanding accuracy and precision constraints that Gaia is
capable of delivering. The internal Gaia photometric system was initialised
using an iterative process that is solely based on Gaia data. A set of
calibrations was derived for the entire Gaia DR2 baseline and then used to
produce the final mean source photometry. The photometric catalogue contains
2.5 billion sources comprised of three different grades depending on the
availability of colour information and the procedure used to calibrate them:
1.5 billion gold, 144 million silver, and 0.9 billion bronze. These figures
reflect the results of the photometric processing; the content of the data
release will be different due to the validation and data quality filters
applied during the catalogue preparation. The photometric processing pipeline,
PhotPipe, implements all the processing and calibration workflows in terms of
Map/Reduce jobs based on the Hadoop platform. This is the first example of a
processing system for a large astrophysical survey project to make use of these
technologies. The improvements in the generation of the integrated G-band
fluxes, in the attitude modelling, in the cross-matching, and and in the
identification of spurious detections led to a much cleaner input stream for
the photometric processing. This, combined with the improvements in the
definition of the internal photometric system and calibration flow, produced
high-quality photometry. Hadoop proved to be an excellent platform choice for
the implementation of PhotPipe in terms of overall performance, scalability,
downtime, and manpower required for operations and maintenance.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09375 [pdf] - 1736360
Gaia Data Release 2: Catalogue validation
Arenou, F.;
Luri, X.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Helmi, A.;
Muraveva, T.;
Robin, A. C.;
Spoto, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Antoja, T.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Jordi, C.;
Leclerc, N.;
Reylé, C.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Shih, I-C.;
Soria, S.;
Barache, C.;
Bossini, D.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Lambert, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Massari, D.;
Moitinho, A.;
Robichon, N.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sordo, R.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Eyer, L.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Pancino, E.;
Soubiran, C.;
Spagna, A.;
Tanga, P.;
Turon, C.;
Zurbach, C.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The second Gaia data release (DR2), contains very precise astrometric and
photometric properties for more than one billion sources, astrophysical
parameters for dozens of millions, radial velocities for millions, variability
information for half a million of stellar sources and orbits for thousands of
solar system objects. Before the Catalogue publication, these data have
undergone dedicated validation processes. The goal of this paper is to describe
the validation results in terms of completeness, accuracy and precision of the
various Gaia DR2 data. The validation processes include a systematic analysis
of the Catalogue content to detect anomalies, either individual errors or
statistical properties, using statistical analysis, and comparisons to external
data or to models. Although the astrometric, photometric and spectroscopic data
are of unprecedented quality and quantity, it is shown that the data cannot be
used without a dedicated attention to the limitations described here, in the
Catalogue documentation and in accompanying papers. A particular emphasis is
put on the caveats for the statistical use of the data in scientific
exploitation.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09830 [pdf] - 1732659
Gaia Data Release 2. Calibration and mitigation of electronic offset
effects in the data
Hambly, N. C.;
Cropper, M.;
Boudreault, S.;
Crowley, C.;
Kohley, R.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Dolding, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Seabroke, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Collins, R.;
Cross, N.;
Martin-Fleitas, J.;
Baker, S.;
Smith, M.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Marchal, O.;
Katz, D.;
de Angeli, F.;
Busso, G.;
Riello, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Els, S.;
Corcione, L.;
Masana, E.;
Luri, X.;
Chassat, F.;
Fusero, F.;
Pasquier, J. F.;
Vetel, C.;
Sarri, G.;
Gare, P.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
The European Space Agency Gaia satellite was launched into orbit around L2 in
December 2013. This ambitious mission has strict requirements on residual
systematic errors resulting from instrumental corrections in order to meet a
design goal of sub-10 microarcsecond astrometry. During the design and build
phase of the science instruments, various critical calibrations were studied in
detail to ensure that this goal could be met in orbit. In particular, it was
determined that the video-chain offsets on the analogue side of the
analogue-to-digital conversion electronics exhibited instabilities that could
not be mitigated fully by modifications to the flight hardware. We provide a
detailed description of the behaviour of the electronic offset levels on
microsecond timescales, identifying various systematic effects that are known
collectively as offset non-uniformities. The effects manifest themselves as
transient perturbations on the gross zero-point electronic offset level that is
routinely monitored as part of the overall calibration process. Using in-orbit
special calibration sequences along with simple parametric models, we show how
the effects can be calibrated, and how these calibrations are applied to the
science data. While the calibration part of the process is relatively
straightforward, the application of the calibrations during science data
processing requires a detailed on-ground reconstruction of the readout timing
of each charge-coupled device (CCD) sample on each device in order to predict
correctly the highly time-dependent nature of the corrections. We demonstrate
the effectiveness of our offset non-uniformity models in mitigating the effects
in Gaia data. We demonstrate for all CCDs and operating instrument and modes on
board Gaia that the video-chain noise-limited performance is recovered in the
vast majority of science samples.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.01667 [pdf] - 1717002
Passband reconstruction from photometry
Submitted: 2018-02-05
Based on an initial expectation from laboratory measurements or instrument
simulations, photometric passbands are usually subject to refinements. These
refinements use photometric observations of astronomical sources with known
spectral energy distribution. This work investigates the methods for and
limitations in determining passbands from photometric observations. A simple
general formalism for passband determinations from photometric measurements is
derived. The results are applied to the passbands of HIPPARCOS, Tycho, and Gaia
DR1. The problem of passband determination is formulated in a basic functional
analytic framework. For the solution of the resulting equations, functional
principal component analysis is applied. We find that, given a set of
calibration sources, the passband can be described with respect to the set of
calibration sources as the sum of two functions, one which is uniquely
determined by the set of calibration sources, and one which is entirely
unconstrained. The constrained components for the HIPPARCOS, Tycho, and Gaia
DR1 passbands are determined, and the unconstrained components are estimated.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.00340 [pdf] - 1567759
Double stars and astrometric uncertainties in Gaia DR1
Submitted: 2017-04-02
A significant number of double stars with separations up to 2.5 arcsec are
present in the Gaia Data Release 1 astrometric catalogs. Limiting our analysis
to a well-studied sample of 1124 doubles resolved by Hipparcos, provided with
individual Tycho component photometry, and cross-matched with the TGAS catalog,
we estimate a rate of at least 3% for brighter double stars in Gaia DR1, which
should be resolved in the future data releases. Gaia astrometric results are
affected by unresolved duplicity. The variance-normalized quadratic differences
of proper motion between Gaia and Hipparcos do not follow the expected chi^2
distribution and show signs of powerful degradation in the components aligned
with the axes of the double systems. This concerns only pairs with separation
below 1.2 -- 1.5 arcsec, which mostly remain unresolved in Gaia DR1. On the
other hand, the orthogonal proper motion components and parallaxes do not have
any detectable perturbation, as well as all astrometry for separations above
1.5 arcsec. Gaia parallaxes do not seem to be perturbed by duplicity, with Gaia
- Hipparcos differences being systematically smaller than the expectation. The
rate of incorrectly identified, or swapped, companions is estimated at 0.4%.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.05873 [pdf] - 1553995
Gaia Data Release 1: Validation of the photometry
Evans, D. W.;
Riello, M.;
De Angeli, F.;
Busso, G.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Voss, H.;
Weiler, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Cacciari, C.;
Burgess, P.;
Osborne, P.
Submitted: 2017-01-20
Aims. The photometric validation of the Gaia DR1 release of the ESA Gaia
mission is described and the quality of the data shown. Methods. This is
carried out via an internal analysis of the photometry using the most constant
sources. Comparisons with external photometric catalogues are also made, but
are limited by the accuracies and systematics present in these catalogues. An
analysis of the quoted errors is also described. Investigations of the
calibration coefficients reveal some of the systematic effects that affect the
fluxes. Results. The analysis of the constant sources shows that the
early-stage photometric calibrations can reach an accuracy as low as 3 mmag.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.00292 [pdf] - 1539003
Gaia Data Release 1: Catalogue validation
Arenou, F.;
Luri, X.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Fabricius, C.;
Helmi, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Findeisen, K.;
Reylé, C.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sordo, R.;
Turon, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Shih, I-C.;
Antiche, E.;
Barache, C.;
Barros, M.;
Breddels, M.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Costigan, G.;
Diakité, S.;
Eyer, L.;
Figueras, F.;
Galluccio, L.;
Heu, J.;
Jordi, C.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lallement, R.;
Lambert, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mor, R.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Soria, S.;
Soubiran, C.;
Souchay, J.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Pancino, E.;
Bragaglia, A.
Submitted: 2017-01-01
Before the publication of the Gaia Catalogue, the contents of the first data
release have undergone multiple dedicated validation tests. These tests aim at
analysing in-depth the Catalogue content to detect anomalies, individual
problems in specific objects or in overall statistical properties, either to
filter them before the public release, or to describe the different caveats of
the release for an optimal exploitation of the data. Dedicated methods using
either Gaia internal data, external catalogues or models have been developed
for the validation processes. They are testing normal stars as well as various
populations like open or globular clusters, double stars, variable stars,
quasars. Properties of coverage, accuracy and precision of the data are
provided by the numerous tests presented here and jointly analysed to assess
the data release content. This independent validation confirms the quality of
the published data, Gaia DR1 being the most precise all-sky astrometric and
photometric catalogue to-date. However, several limitations in terms of
completeness, astrometric and photometric quality are identified and described.
Figures describing the relevant properties of the release are shown and the
testing activities carried out validating the user interfaces are also
described. A particular emphasis is made on the statistical use of the data in
scientific exploitation.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.02952 [pdf] - 1538988
Gaia data release 1, the photometric data
van Leeuwen, F.;
Evans, D. W.;
De Angeli, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Busso, G.;
Cacciari, C.;
Riello, M.;
Pancino, E.;
Altavilla, G.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Burgess, P.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Davidson, M.;
De Luise, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Galleti, S.;
Gilmore, G.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Holland, G.;
MacDonald, I.;
Marinoni, S.;
Montegrffo, P.;
Osborne, P.;
Ragaini, S.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rowell, N.;
Voss, H.;
Walton, N. A.;
Weiler, M.;
Castellani, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Høg, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Millar, N. R.;
Pagani, C.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pulone, L.;
Rixon, G.;
Suess, F. F.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Alecu, A.;
Allan, P. M.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Belokurov, V.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Brown, S.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Burgon, R.;
Campbell, H.;
Collins, R. S.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Ducourant, C.;
van Elteren, A.;
Evans, N. W.;
Federici, L.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraser, M.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, A. D.;
Iannicola, G.;
Irwin, M.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Mann, R. G.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Masana, E.;
Munari, U.;
Ortiz, P.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Peltzer, C.;
Portell, J.;
Read, A.;
Terrett, D.;
Torra, J.;
Trager, S. C.;
Troisi, L.;
Valentini, G.;
Vallenari, A.;
Wevers, T.
Submitted: 2016-12-09
Context. This paper presents an overview of the photometric data that are
part of the first Gaia data release. Aims. The principles of the processing and
the main characteristics of the Gaia photometric data are presented. Methods.
The calibration strategy is outlined briefly and the main properties of the
resulting photometry are presented. Results. Relations with other broadband
photometric systems are provided. The overall precision for the Gaia photometry
is shown to be at the milli-magnitude level and has a clear potential to
improve further in future releases.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.02036 [pdf] - 1523880
Gaia data release 1: Principles of the photometric calibration of the G
band
Carrasco, J. M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Jordi, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Riello, M.;
Voss, H.;
De Angeli, F.;
Busso, G.;
Fabricius, C.;
Cacciari, C.;
Weiler, M.;
Pancino, E.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Holland, G.;
Burgess, P.;
Osborne, P.;
Altavilla, G.;
Gebran, M.;
Ragaini, S.;
Galleti, S.;
Cocozza, G.;
Marinoni, S.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Federici, L.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.
Submitted: 2016-11-07
Context. Gaia is an ESA cornerstone mission launched on 19 December 2013
aiming to obtain the most complete and precise 3D map of our Galaxy by
observing more than one billion sources. This paper is part of a series of
documents explaining the data processing and its results for Gaia Data Release
1, focussing on the G band photometry. Aims. This paper describes the
calibration model of the Gaia photometric passband for Gaia Data Release 1.
Methods. The overall principle of splitting the process into internal and
external calibrations is outlined. In the internal calibration, a
self-consistent photometric system is generated. Then, the external calibration
provides the link to the absolute photometric flux scales. Results. The Gaia
photometric calibration pipeline explained here was applied to the first data
release with good results. Details are given of the various calibration
elements including the mathematical formulation of the models used and of the
extraction and preparation of the required input parameters (e.g. colour
terms). The external calibration in this first release provides the absolute
zero point and photometric transformations from the Gaia G passband to other
common photometric systems. Conclusions. This paper describes the photometric
calibration implemented for the first Gaia data release and the instrumental
effects taken into account. For this first release no aperture losses,
radiation damage, and other second-order effects have not yet been implemented
in the calibration.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04273 [pdf] - 1480671
Gaia Data Release 1, Pre-processing and source list creation
Submitted: 2016-09-14
The first data release from the Gaia mission contains accurate positions and
magnitudes for more than a billion sources, and proper motions and parallaxes
for the majority of the 2.5~million Hipparcos and Tycho-2 stars.
We describe three essential elements of the initial data treatment leading to
this catalogue: the image analysis, the construction of a source list, and the
near real-time monitoring of the payload health. We also discuss some weak
points that set limitations for the attainable precision at the present stage
of the mission.
Image parameters for point sources are derived from one-dimensional scans,
using a maximum likelihood method, under the assumption of a line spread
function constant in time, and a complete modelling of bias and background.
These conditions are, however, not completely fulfilled. The Gaia source list
is built starting from a large ground-based catalogue, but even so a
significant number of new entries have been added, and a large number have been
removed. The autonomous onboard star image detection will pick up many spurious
images, especially around bright sources, and such unwanted detections must be
identified. Another key step of the source list creation consists in arranging
the more than $10^{10}$ individual detections in spatially isolated groups that
can be analysed individually.
Complete software systems have been built for the Gaia initial data
treatment, that manage approximately 50~million focal plane transits daily,
giving transit times and fluxes for 500~million individual CCD images to the
astrometric and photometric processing chains. The software also carries out a
successful and detailed daily monitoring of Gaia health.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04240 [pdf] - 1480663
On-orbit performance of the Gaia CCDs at L2
Crowley, C.;
Kohley, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Davidson, M.;
Abreu, A.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Seabroke, G.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Short, A.;
Lindegren, L.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Sarri, G.;
Gare, P.;
Prusti, T.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Mora, A.;
Martin-Fleitas, J.;
Raison, F.;
Lammers, U.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Jansen, F.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
The European Space Agency's Gaia satellite was launched into orbit around L2
in December 2013 with a payload containing 106 large-format scientific CCDs.
The primary goal of the mission is to repeatedly obtain high-precision
astrometric and photometric measurements of one thousand million stars over the
course of five years. The scientific value of the down-linked data, and the
operation of the onboard autonomous detection chain, relies on the high
performance of the detectors. As Gaia slowly rotates and scans the sky, the
CCDs are continuously operated in a mode where the line clock rate and the
satellite rotation spin-rate are in synchronisation. Nominal mission operations
began in July 2014 and the first data release is being prepared for release at
the end of Summer 2016.
In this paper we present an overview of the focal plane, the detector system,
and strategies for on-orbit performance monitoring of the system. This is
followed by a presentation of the performance results based on analysis of data
acquired during a two-year window beginning at payload switch-on. Results for
parameters such as readout noise and electronic offset behaviour are presented
and we pay particular attention to the effects of the L2 radiation environment
on the devices. The radiation-induced degradation in the charge transfer
efficiency (CTE) in the (parallel) scan direction is clearly diagnosed;
however, an extrapolation shows that charge transfer inefficiency (CTI) effects
at end of mission will be approximately an order of magnitude less than
predicted pre-flight. It is shown that the CTI in the serial register
(horizontal direction) is still dominated by the traps inherent to the
manufacturing process and that the radiation-induced degradation so far is only
a few per cent. Finally, we summarise some of the detector effects discovered
on-orbit which are still being investigated.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04303 [pdf] - 1523840
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million
proper motions and parallaxes
Lindegren, L.;
Lammers, U.;
Bastian, U.;
Hernández, J.;
Klioner, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Bombrun, A.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Abbas, U.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anton, S.;
Bach, N.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Berthier, J.;
Bianchi, L.;
Biermann, M.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Carlucci, T.;
Castañeda, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Clotet, M.;
Crosta, M.;
Davidson, M.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Geyer, R.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hauser, M.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Löffler, W.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Portell, J.;
Riva, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Serraller, I.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R.;
Spagna, A.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Zschocke, S.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Gracia, G.;
Raison, F.;
Lister, T.;
Marchant, J.;
Messineo, R.;
Soffel, M.;
Osorio, J.;
de Torres, A.;
O'Mullane, W.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1
billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by
the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give
a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the
model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in
common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric
single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from
the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by
neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an
analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison
with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down
to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to
Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors
depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond
(mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to
~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is
aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than
0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03
mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the
Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the
nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the
quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what
is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent
a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical
definition of the optical reference frame.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.0815 [pdf] - 1034101
Gaia broad band photometry
Jordi, C.;
Gebran, M.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Voss, H.;
Fabricius, C.;
Knude, J.;
Vallenari, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Mora, A.
Submitted: 2010-08-04, last modified: 2010-10-14
The scientific community needs to be prepared to analyse the data from Gaia,
one of the most ambitious ESA space missions, to be launched in 2012. The
purpose of this paper is to provide data and tools in order to predict in
advance how Gaia photometry is expected to be. To do so, we provide
relationships among colours involving Gaia magnitudes and colours from other
commonly used photometric systems (Johnson-Cousins, SDSS, Hipparcos and Tycho).
The most up-to-date information from industrial partners has been used to
define the nominal passbands and based on the BaSeL3.1 stellar spectral energy
distribution library, relationships were obtained for stars with different
reddening values, ranges of temperatures, surface gravities and metallicities.
The transformations involving Gaia and Johnson-Cousins V-I_C and Sloan DSS g-z
colours have the lowest residuals. A polynomial expression for the relation
between the effective temperature and the colour G_BP-G_RP was derived for
stars with T > 4500 K. Transformations involving two Johnson or two Sloan DSS
colours yield lower residuals than using only one colour. We also computed
several ratios of total-to-selective absorption including absorption A_G in the
G band and colour excess E(G_BP-G_RP) for our sample stars. A relationship,
involving A_G/A_V and the intrinsic (V-I_C) colour, is provided. The derived
Gaia passbands have been used to compute tracks and isochrones using the Padova
and BASTI models. Finally, the performances of the predicted Gaia magnitudes
have been estimated according to the magnitude and the celestial coordinates of
the star. The provided dependencies among colours can be used for planning
scientific exploitation of Gaia data, performing simulations of the Gaia-like
sky, planning ground-based complementary observations and for building
catalogues with auxiliary data for the Gaia data processing and validation.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0512038 [pdf] - 78238
The design and performance of the Gaia photometric system
Jordi, C.;
Hoeg, E.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Knude, J.;
Straizys, V.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Claeskens, J. -F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Figueras, F.;
Grenon, M.;
Kolka, I.;
Perryman, M. A. C.;
Tautvaisiene, G.;
Vansevicius, V.;
Willemsen, P. G.;
Bridzius, A.;
Evans, D. W.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fiorucci, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Kaempf, T. A.;
Kazlauskas, A.;
Kucinskas, A.;
Malyuto, V.;
Munari, U.;
Reyle, C.;
Torra, J.;
Vallenari, A.;
Zdanavicius, K.;
Korakitis, R.;
Malkov, O.;
Smette, A.
Submitted: 2005-12-01
The European Gaia astrometry mission is due for launch in 2011. Gaia will
rely on the proven principles of ESA's Hipparcos mission to create an all-sky
survey of about one billion stars throughout our Galaxy and beyond, by
observing all objects down to 20th magnitude. Through its massive measurement
of stellar distances, motions and multi-colour photometry it will provide
fundamental data necessary for unravelling the structure, formation and
evolution of the Galaxy. This paper presents the design and performance of the
broad- and medium-band set of photometric filters adopted as the baseline for
Gaia. The nineteen selected passbands (extending from the ultraviolet to the
far-red), the criteria, and the methodology on which this choice has been based
are discussed in detail. We analyse the photometric capabilities for
characterizing the luminosity, temperature, gravity and chemical composition of
stars. We also discuss the automatic determination of these physical parameters
for the large number of observations involved, for objects located throughout
the entire Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Finally, the capability of the
photometric system to deal with the main Gaia science case is outlined.