Normalized to: Föhring, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.14064 [pdf] - 2115241
Physical Characterisation of Interstellar Comet 2I/2019 Q4 (Borisov)
Submitted: 2020-03-31, last modified: 2020-06-16
We present a study of interstellar comet 2I/2019 Q4 (Borisov) using both
preperihelion and postperihelion observations spanning late September 2019
through late January 2020. The intrinsic brightness of the comet was observed
to continuously decline throughout the timespan, likely due to the decreasing
effective scattering cross-section as a result of volatile sublimation with a
slope of $-0.43 \pm 0.02$ km$^{2}$ d$^{-1}$. We witnessed no significant change
in the slightly reddish colour of the comet, with mean values of $\left \langle
g - r \right \rangle = 0.68 \pm 0.04$, $\left \langle r - i \right \rangle =
0.23 \pm 0.03$, and the normalised reflectivity gradient across the $g$ and $i$
bands $\overline{S'} \left(g,i\right) = \left(10.6 \pm 1.4\right)$ % per $10^3$
\AA, all unremarkable in the context of solar system comets. Using the
available astrometric observations, we confidently detect the nongravitational
acceleration of the comet following a shallow heliocentric distance dependency
of $r_{\rm H}^{-1 \pm 1}$. Accordingly, we estimate that the nucleus is most
likely $\lesssim$0.4 km in radius, and that a fraction of $\gtrsim$0.2% of the
total nucleus in mass has been eroded due to the sublimation activity since the
earliest observation of the comet in 2018 December by the time of perihelion.
Our morphology simulation suggests that the dust ejection speed increased from
$\sim$4 m s$^{-1}$ in September 2019 to $\sim$7 m s$^{-1}$ around perihelion
for the optically dominant dust grains of $\beta \sim 0.01$, and that the
observable dust grains are no smaller than micron size.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.02004 [pdf] - 1967057
Atmospheric Scintillation Noise in Ground-Based Exoplanet Photometry
Submitted: 2019-09-04
Atmospheric scintillation caused by optical turbulence in the Earth's
atmosphere can be the dominant source of noise in ground-based photometric
observations of bright targets, which is a particular concern for ground-based
exoplanet transit photometry. We demonstrate the implications of atmospheric
scintillation for exoplanet transit photometry through contemporaneous
turbulence profiling and transit observations. We find a strong correlation
between measured intensity variations and scintillation determined through
optical turbulence profiling. This correlation indicates that turbulence
profiling can be used to accurately model the amount of scintillation noise
present in photometric observations on another telescope at the same site. We
examine the conditions under which scintillation correction would be beneficial
for transit photometry through turbulence profiling, and find that for the
atmosphere of La Palma, scintillation dominates for bright targets of magnitude
above $V\sim10.1$ mag for a 0.5~m telescope, and at $V\sim11.7$ mag for a 4.2 m
telescope under median atmospheric conditions. Through Markov-chain Monte Carlo
methods we examine the effect of scintillation noise on the uncertainty of the
measured exoplanet parameters, and determine the regimes where scintillation
correction is especially beneficial. The ability to model the amount of noise
in observations due to scintillation, given an understanding of the atmosphere,
is a crucial test for our understanding of scintillation and the overall noise
budget of our observations.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.06921 [pdf] - 1259064
Atmospheric Scintillation in Astronomical Photometry
Submitted: 2015-06-23
Scintillation noise due to the Earth's turbulent atmosphere can be a dominant
noise source in high-precision astronomical photometry when observing bright
targets from the ground. Here we describe the phenomenon of scintillation from
its physical origins to its effect on photometry. We show that Young's (1967)
scintillation-noise approximation used by many astronomers tends to
underestimate the median scintillation noise at several major observatories
around the world. We show that using median atmospheric optical turbulence
profiles, which are now available for most sites, provides a better estimate of
the expected scintillation noise and that real-time turbulence profiles can be
used to precisely characterise the scintillation noise component of
contemporaneous photometric measurements. This will enable a better
understanding and calibration of photometric noise sources and the
effectiveness of scintillation correction techniques. We also provide new
equations for calculating scintillation noise, including for extremely large
telescopes where the scintillation noise will actually be lower than previously
thought. These equations highlight the fact that scintillation noise and shot
noise have the same dependence on exposure time and so if an observation is
scintillation limited, it will be scintillation limited for all exposure times.
The ratio of scintillation noise to shot noise is also only weakly dependent on
telescope diameter and so a bigger telescope may not yield a reduction in
fractional scintillation noise.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.0337 [pdf] - 1173149
ULTRACAM z'-band Detection of the Secondary Eclipse of WASP-12b
Submitted: 2013-08-01
We present z'-band secondary eclipse photometry of the highly irradiated hot
Jupiter WASP-12b using ULTRACAM on the 4.2m William Herschel Telescope. We
measure a decrease in flux of \delta = 0.130+/-0.013% during the passage of the
planet behind the star, which is significantly deeper than the previous
measurement at this wavelength (0.082+/-0.015%, L\'opez-Morales et al. 2010).
Our secondary eclipse is best fit with a mid-eclipse phase, \phi, that is
compatible with a circular orbit \phi = 0.501+/-0.002, in agreement with
previous results (Croll et al. 2011). In combination with existing data, our
eclipse depth measurement allows us to constrain the characteristics of the
planet's atmosphere, which is consistent with a carbon-rich model, with no
evidence for a strong thermal inversion. If the difference in eclipse depth
reported here compared to that of L\'opez-Morales et al. (2010) is of physical
origin, as opposed to due to systematics, it may be caused by temporal
variability in the flux, due to atmospheric dynamics.