sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Föhring, D.

Normalized to: Föhring, D.

4 article(s) in total. 11 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2003.14064  [pdf] - 2115241
Physical Characterisation of Interstellar Comet 2I/2019 Q4 (Borisov)
Comments: Accepted for publication in Astronomical Journal
Submitted: 2020-03-31, last modified: 2020-06-16
We present a study of interstellar comet 2I/2019 Q4 (Borisov) using both preperihelion and postperihelion observations spanning late September 2019 through late January 2020. The intrinsic brightness of the comet was observed to continuously decline throughout the timespan, likely due to the decreasing effective scattering cross-section as a result of volatile sublimation with a slope of $-0.43 \pm 0.02$ km$^{2}$ d$^{-1}$. We witnessed no significant change in the slightly reddish colour of the comet, with mean values of $\left \langle g - r \right \rangle = 0.68 \pm 0.04$, $\left \langle r - i \right \rangle = 0.23 \pm 0.03$, and the normalised reflectivity gradient across the $g$ and $i$ bands $\overline{S'} \left(g,i\right) = \left(10.6 \pm 1.4\right)$ % per $10^3$ \AA, all unremarkable in the context of solar system comets. Using the available astrometric observations, we confidently detect the nongravitational acceleration of the comet following a shallow heliocentric distance dependency of $r_{\rm H}^{-1 \pm 1}$. Accordingly, we estimate that the nucleus is most likely $\lesssim$0.4 km in radius, and that a fraction of $\gtrsim$0.2% of the total nucleus in mass has been eroded due to the sublimation activity since the earliest observation of the comet in 2018 December by the time of perihelion. Our morphology simulation suggests that the dust ejection speed increased from $\sim$4 m s$^{-1}$ in September 2019 to $\sim$7 m s$^{-1}$ around perihelion for the optically dominant dust grains of $\beta \sim 0.01$, and that the observable dust grains are no smaller than micron size.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.02004  [pdf] - 1967057
Atmospheric Scintillation Noise in Ground-Based Exoplanet Photometry
Comments: Accepted for publication in MNRAS. 12 pages, 13 figures
Submitted: 2019-09-04
Atmospheric scintillation caused by optical turbulence in the Earth's atmosphere can be the dominant source of noise in ground-based photometric observations of bright targets, which is a particular concern for ground-based exoplanet transit photometry. We demonstrate the implications of atmospheric scintillation for exoplanet transit photometry through contemporaneous turbulence profiling and transit observations. We find a strong correlation between measured intensity variations and scintillation determined through optical turbulence profiling. This correlation indicates that turbulence profiling can be used to accurately model the amount of scintillation noise present in photometric observations on another telescope at the same site. We examine the conditions under which scintillation correction would be beneficial for transit photometry through turbulence profiling, and find that for the atmosphere of La Palma, scintillation dominates for bright targets of magnitude above $V\sim10.1$ mag for a 0.5~m telescope, and at $V\sim11.7$ mag for a 4.2 m telescope under median atmospheric conditions. Through Markov-chain Monte Carlo methods we examine the effect of scintillation noise on the uncertainty of the measured exoplanet parameters, and determine the regimes where scintillation correction is especially beneficial. The ability to model the amount of noise in observations due to scintillation, given an understanding of the atmosphere, is a crucial test for our understanding of scintillation and the overall noise budget of our observations.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1506.06921  [pdf] - 1259064
Atmospheric Scintillation in Astronomical Photometry
Comments: 11 pages, 12 figures, accepted in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-06-23
Scintillation noise due to the Earth's turbulent atmosphere can be a dominant noise source in high-precision astronomical photometry when observing bright targets from the ground. Here we describe the phenomenon of scintillation from its physical origins to its effect on photometry. We show that Young's (1967) scintillation-noise approximation used by many astronomers tends to underestimate the median scintillation noise at several major observatories around the world. We show that using median atmospheric optical turbulence profiles, which are now available for most sites, provides a better estimate of the expected scintillation noise and that real-time turbulence profiles can be used to precisely characterise the scintillation noise component of contemporaneous photometric measurements. This will enable a better understanding and calibration of photometric noise sources and the effectiveness of scintillation correction techniques. We also provide new equations for calculating scintillation noise, including for extremely large telescopes where the scintillation noise will actually be lower than previously thought. These equations highlight the fact that scintillation noise and shot noise have the same dependence on exposure time and so if an observation is scintillation limited, it will be scintillation limited for all exposure times. The ratio of scintillation noise to shot noise is also only weakly dependent on telescope diameter and so a bigger telescope may not yield a reduction in fractional scintillation noise.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1308.0337  [pdf] - 1173149
ULTRACAM z'-band Detection of the Secondary Eclipse of WASP-12b
Comments: 6 pages, 4 figures, Accepted by MNRAS
Submitted: 2013-08-01
We present z'-band secondary eclipse photometry of the highly irradiated hot Jupiter WASP-12b using ULTRACAM on the 4.2m William Herschel Telescope. We measure a decrease in flux of \delta = 0.130+/-0.013% during the passage of the planet behind the star, which is significantly deeper than the previous measurement at this wavelength (0.082+/-0.015%, L\'opez-Morales et al. 2010). Our secondary eclipse is best fit with a mid-eclipse phase, \phi, that is compatible with a circular orbit \phi = 0.501+/-0.002, in agreement with previous results (Croll et al. 2011). In combination with existing data, our eclipse depth measurement allows us to constrain the characteristics of the planet's atmosphere, which is consistent with a carbon-rich model, with no evidence for a strong thermal inversion. If the difference in eclipse depth reported here compared to that of L\'opez-Morales et al. (2010) is of physical origin, as opposed to due to systematics, it may be caused by temporal variability in the flux, due to atmospheric dynamics.