sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Esteves, J.

Normalized to: Esteves, J.

2 article(s) in total. 131 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 22,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.10162  [pdf] - 2117715
$\mu_{\star}$ Masses: Weak Lensing Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 redMaPPer Clusters using Stellar Masses
Comments: 20 pages, 10 figures, submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2020-06-17
We present the weak lensing mass calibration of the stellar mass based $\mu_{\star}$ mass proxy for redMaPPer galaxy clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1. For the first time we are able to perform a calibration of $\mu_{\star}$ at high redshifts, $z>0.33$. In a blinded analysis, we use $\sim 6,000$ clusters split into 12 subsets spanning the ranges $0.1 \leqslant z<0.65$ and $\mu_{\star}$ up to $\sim 5.5 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}$, and infer the average masses of these subsets through modelling of their stacked weak lensing signal. In our model we account for the following sources of systematic uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors, miscentring, cluster-member contamination of the source sample, deviations from the NFW halo profile, halo triaxiality and projection effects. We use the inferred masses to estimate the joint mass--$\mu_{\star}$--$z$ scaling relation given by $\langle M_{200c} | \mu_{\star},z \rangle = M_0 (\mu_{\star}/5.16\times 10^{12} \mathrm{M_{\odot}})^{F_{\mu_{\star}}} ((1+z)/1.35)^{G_z}$. We find $M_0= (1.14 \pm 0.07) \times 10^{14} \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ with $F_{\mu_{\star}}= 0.76 \pm 0.06$ and $G_z= -1.14 \pm 0.37$. We discuss the use of $\mu_{\star}$ as a complementary mass proxy to the well-studied richness $\lambda$ for: $i)$ exploring the regimes of low $z$, $\lambda<20$ and high $\lambda$, $z \sim 1$; $ii)$ testing systematics such as projection effects for applications in cluster cosmology.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1912.03301  [pdf] - 2086446
Two Ultra-Faint Milky Way Stellar Systems Discovered in Early Data from the DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey
Comments: 17 pages, 6 figures, 1 table; updated to match published version
Submitted: 2019-12-06, last modified: 2020-04-28
We report the discovery of two ultra-faint stellar systems found in early data from the DECam Local Volume Exploration survey (DELVE). The first system, Centaurus I (DELVE J1238-4054), is identified as a resolved overdensity of old and metal-poor stars with a heliocentric distance of ${\rm D}_{\odot} = 116.3_{-0.6}^{+0.6}$ kpc, a half-light radius of $r_h = 2.3_{-0.3}^{+0.4}$ arcmin, an age of $\tau > 12.85$ Gyr, a metallicity of $Z = 0.0002_{-0.0002}^{+0.0001}$, and an absolute magnitude of $M_V = -5.55_{-0.11}^{+0.11}$ mag. This characterization is consistent with the population of ultra-faint satellites, and confirmation of this system would make Centaurus I one of the brightest recently discovered ultra-faint dwarf galaxies. Centaurus I is detected in Gaia DR2 with a clear and distinct proper motion signal, confirming that it is a real association of stars distinct from the Milky Way foreground; this is further supported by the clustering of blue horizontal branch stars near the centroid of the system. The second system, DELVE 1 (DELVE J1630-0058), is identified as a resolved overdensity of stars with a heliocentric distance of ${\rm D}_{\odot} = 19.0_{-0.6}^{+0.5} kpc$, a half-light radius of $r_h = 0.97_{-0.17}^{+0.24}$ arcmin, an age of $\tau = 12.5_{-0.7}^{+1.0}$ Gyr, a metallicity of $Z = 0.0005_{-0.0001}^{+0.0002}$, and an absolute magnitude of $M_V = -0.2_{-0.6}^{+0.8}$ mag, consistent with the known population of faint halo star clusters. Given the low number of probable member stars at magnitudes accessible with Gaia DR2, a proper motion signal for DELVE 1 is only marginally detected. We compare the spatial position and proper motion of both Centaurus I and DELVE 1 with simulations of the accreted satellite population of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and find that neither is likely to be associated with the LMC.