Escalera, E.
Normalized to: Escalera, E.
3 article(s) in total. 7 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9707098 [pdf] - 97922
New Optical Insights into the Mass Discrepancy of Galaxy Clusters: The
Cases of A1689 and A2218
Submitted: 1997-07-08
We analyze the internal structures of clusters A1689 and A2218 by applying a
recent development of the method of wavelet analysis, which uses the complete
information obtained from optical data, i.e. galaxy positions and redshifts. We
find that both clusters show the presence of structures superimposed along the
line of sight with different mean redshifts and smaller velocity dispersions
than that of the system as a whole, suggesting that the clusters could be cases
of the on-going merging of clumps. In the case of A2218 we find an acceptable
agreement between our estimate of optical virial mass and X-ray and
gravitational lensing masses. On the contrary, in the case of A1689 we find
that our mass estimates are smaller than X-ray and gravitational lensing ones
at both small and large radii. In any case, at variance with earlier claims,
there is no evidence that X-ray mass estimates are underestimated.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9612206 [pdf] - 96234
Optical Substructures in 48 Galaxy Clusters
Submitted: 1996-12-20
We analyze the presence of substructures in a set of 48 galaxy clusters, by
using galaxy positions and redshifts. We use a multi-scale analysis which
couples kinematical estimators with the wavelet transform. 14% of our clusters
are strongly substructured (i.e. they are bimodal or complex) and 24% of the
remaining unimodal clusters contain substructures at small scales. Thus, in
substantial agreement with previous studies, about one third of clusters show
substructures. In unimodal clusters the presence of substructures does not
affect the estimates of both virial masses and velocity dispersions, which are
generally in good agreement with the X-ray temperatures. Thus, unimodal
clusters are not too far from a status of dynamical equilibrium. On the
contrary, velocity dispersions and masses for some bimodal or complex clusters
strongly depend on whether they are treated as single systems or as sums of
different clumps and X-ray temperatures and velocity dispersions may be very
different.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9309057 [pdf] - 90970
Structures in Galaxy Clusters
Submitted: 1993-09-30
The analysis of the presence of substructures in 16 well-sampled clusters of
galaxies suggests a stimulating hypothesis: Clusters could be classified as
unimodal or bimodal, on the basis of to the sub-clump distribution in the {\em
3-D} space of positions and velocities. The dynamic study of these clusters
shows that their fundamental characteristics, in particular the virial masses,
are not severely biased by the presence of subclustering if the system
considered is bound.