We introduce a set of four new publicly available N-body simulations, the most recent additions to the Texas P^3M Database. Our models probe the less studied parameter space region of moderate volume (100/h Mpc box) combined with fine mass resolution (~10^12 M_Sol, roughly comparable to a L_* galaxy), making these simulations especially suitable for study of major large-scale structure features such as voids, and for comparison with the largest three-dimensional redshift surveys currently available. Our cosmological models (LCDM, TOCDM, OCDM, TCDM) are all COBE-normalized, and when possible (LCDM and TOCDM) also cluster-normalized, based on the X-ray cluster M--T relation. The COBE- and cluster-normalized LCDM model reiterates the attractiveness of this currently favored model which does not require the introduction of tilt in order to fit the constraints imposed by observations of other cosmological parameters.

We present a comparison between the voids in two nearly all sky redshift surveys: the ORS and the IRAS 1.2 Jy. While the galaxies in these surveys are selected differently and their populations are known to be biased relative to each other, the two void distributions are similar. We compare the spatial distribution of the two void populations and demonstrate the correlation between them. The voids also agree with regard to the overall void statistics -- a filling factor of ~0.45 of the volume, an average void diameter ~45/h Mpc and an average galaxy underdensity in the voids of approximately -0.9. Our measurements of the underdensities of the voids in the two surveys enable us to estimate the relative bias in the voids between optical and IRAS samples. We find b(opt) / b(IRAS) ~ 1, showing that on average there is little -- or no -- biasing between the two void populations.

Using the VOID FINDER algorithm we have compiled a catalogue of voids in the IRAS 1.2-Jy sample. The positions of the voids correspond well to underdense regions seen in the IRAS smoothed density map. However, since in our analysis no smoothing is used, all structures appear much sharper: walls are not smeared and the voids are not artificially reduced by them. Therefore the current method based on the galaxy point distribution is better suited to determine the diameter of voids in the galaxy distribution. We have identified 24 voids, covering more than 30% of the volume considered. By comparing the results with equivalent random catalogues we have determined that 12 voids are significant at a 0.95 confidence level, having an average diameter of 40+-6 h^{-1} Mpc. Our results serve not only for charting the cosmography of the nearby Universe, but also to give support to the results recently obtained with the SSRS2 sample, suggesting a void-filled Universe. Moreover, our results indicate that the voids detected have a similar scale, demonstrating that both optically and IRAS-selected galaxies delineate the same large-scale structures.

Voids are the most prominent feature of the large-scale structure of the universe. Still, they have been generally ignored in quantitative analysis of it, essentially due to the lack of an objective tool to identify the voids and to quantify them. To overcome this, we have developed the VOID FINDER algorithm, a novel tool for objectively quantifying voids in the galaxy distribution. We apply the algorithm to two redshift surveys, the dense SSRS2 and the full-sky IRAS 1.2-Jy. Both surveys show similar properties: ~50% of the volume is filled by the voids. The voids have a scale of at least 40 h^{-1}Mpc, and a -0.9 average under-density. Faint galaxies do not fill the voids, but they do populate them more than bright ones. These results suggest that both optically and IRAS selected galaxies delineate the same large-scale structure. Comparison with the recovered mass distribution further suggests that the observed voids in the galaxy distribution correspond well to under-dense regions in the mass distribution. This confirms the gravitational origin of the voids.

Voids are the most prominent feature of the LSS of the universe. Still, they have been generally ignored in quantitative analysis of it, essentially due to the lack of an objective tool to identify and quantify the voids. To overcome this, we present the Void-Finder algorithm, a novel tool for objectively quantifying galaxy voids. The algorithm classifies galaxies as either wall- or field-galaxies. Then it identifies voids in the wall-galaxy distribution. Voids are defined as continuous volumes that do not contain any wall-galaxies. The voids must be thicker than an adjustable limit, which is refined in successive iterations. We test the algorithm using Voronoi tessellations. By appropriate scaling of the parameters we apply it to the SSRS2 survey and to the IRAS 1.2 Jy. Both surveys show similar properties: ~50% of the volume is filled by the voids, which have a scale of at least 40 Mpc, and a -0.9 under-density. Faint galaxies populate the voids more than bright ones. These results suggest that both optically and IRAS selected galaxies delineate the same LSS. Comparison with the recovered mass distribution further suggests that the observed voids in the galaxy distribution correspond well to under-dense regions in the mass distribution. This confirms the gravitational origin of the voids.

We present a new void search algorithm for automated detection of voids in three-dimensional redshift surveys. Based on a model in which the main features of the LSS of the Universe are voids and walls, we classify the galaxies into wall galaxies and field galaxies and we define voids as continuous volumes that are devoid of any wall galaxies. Field galaxies are allowed within the voids. The algorithm makes no assumptions regarding the shapes of the voids and the only constraint that is imposed is that the voids are always thicker than a preset limit, thus eliminating connections between adjacent voids through smal breaches in the walls. By appropriate scaling of the parameters with the selection function this algorithm can be used to analyze flux-limited surveys. We test the algorithm on Voronoi tessellations and apply it to the SSRS2 redshift survey to derive the spectrum of void sizes and other void properties. We find that the average diameter of a void is $37\pm 8 \h$ Mpc. We suggest the usage of this fully automated algorithm to derive a quantitative description of the voids, as another tool in describing the large scale structure of the Universe and for comparison with numerical simulations.