Normalized to: Eichstädt, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.00072 [pdf] - 2095078
Jupiter's Equatorial Plumes and Hot Spots: Spectral Mapping from
Gemini/TEXES and Juno/MWR
Fletcher, L. N.;
Orton, G. S.;
Greathouse, T. K.;
Rogers, J. H.;
Zhang, Z.;
Oyafuso, F. A.;
Eichstädt, G.;
Melin, H.;
Li, C.;
Levin, S. M.;
Bolton, S.;
Janssen, M.;
Mettig, H-J.;
Grassi, D.;
Mura, A.;
Adriani, A.
Submitted: 2020-03-31, last modified: 2020-05-14
We present multi-wavelength measurements of the thermal, chemical, and cloud
contrasts associated with the visibly dark formations (also known as 5-$\mu$m
hot spots) and intervening bright plumes on the boundary between Jupiter's
Equatorial Zone (EZ) and North Equatorial Belt (NEB). Observations made by the
TEXES 5-20 $\mu$m spectrometer at the Gemini North Telescope in March 2017
reveal the upper-tropospheric properties of 12 hot spots, which are directly
compared to measurements by Juno using the Microwave Radiometer (MWR), JIRAM at
5 $\mu$m, and JunoCam visible images. MWR and thermal-infrared spectroscopic
results are consistent near 0.7 bar. Mid-infrared-derived aerosol opacity is
consistent with that inferred from visible-albedo and 5-$\mu$m opacity maps.
Aerosol contrasts, the defining characteristics of the cloudy plumes and
aerosol-depleted hot spots, are not a good proxy for microwave brightness. The
hot spots are neither uniformly warmer nor ammonia-depleted compared to their
surroundings at $p<1$ bar. At 0.7 bar, the microwave brightness at the edges of
hot spots is comparable to other features within the NEB. Conversely, hot spots
are brighter at 1.5 bar, signifying either warm temperatures and/or depleted
NH$_3$ at depth. Temperatures and ammonia are spatially variable within the hot
spots, so the precise location of the observations matters to their
interpretation. Reflective plumes sometimes have enhanced NH$_3$, cold
temperatures, and elevated aerosol opacity, but each plume appears different.
Neither plumes nor hot spots had microwave signatures in channels sensing
$p>10$ bars, suggesting that the hot-spot/plume wave is a relatively shallow
feature.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.04437 [pdf] - 1996254
Observations and numerical modelling of a convective disturbance in a
large-scale cyclone in Jupiter's South Temperate Belt
Iñurrigarro, P.;
Hueso, R.;
Legarreta, J.;
Sánchez-Lavega, A.;
Eichstädt, G.;
Rogers, J. H.;
Orton, G. S.;
Hansen, C. J.;
Pérez-Hoyos, S.;
Rojas, J. F.;
Gómez-Forrellad, J. M.
Submitted: 2019-11-11
Moist convective storms in Jupiter develop frequently and can trigger
atmospheric activity of different scales, from localized storms to
planetary-scale disturbances including convective activity confined inside a
larger meteorological system. In February 2018 a series of convective storms
erupted in Jupiter's South Temperate Belt (STB) (planetocentric latitudes from
-23$^{\circ}$ to -29.5$^{\circ}$). This occurred inside an elongated cyclonic
region known popularly as the STB Ghost, close to the large anticyclone Oval
BA, resulting in the clouds from the storms being confined to the cyclone. The
initial storms lasted only a few days but they generated abundant enduring
turbulence. They also produced dark features, possibly partially devoid of
clouds, that circulated around the cyclone over the first week. The subsequent
activity developed over months and resulted in two main structures, one of them
closely interacting with Oval BA and the other one being expelled to the west.
Here we present a study of this meteorological activity based on daily
observations provided by the amateur community, complemented by observations
obtained from PlanetCam UPV/EHU at Calar Alto Observatory, the Hubble Space
Telescope and by JunoCam on the Juno spacecraft. We also perform numerical
simulations with the EPIC General Circulation Model to reproduce the
phenomenology observed. The successful simulations require a complex interplay
between the Ghost, the convective eruptions and Oval BA, and they demonstrate
that water moist convection was the source of the initial storms. A simple
scale comparison with other moist convective storms that can be observed in the
planet in visible and methane absorption band images strongly suggests that
most of these storms are powered by water condensation instead of ammonia.