Normalized to: Echeverria, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.01378 [pdf] - 1502045
Analysis of the Bayesian Cramer-Rao lower bound in astrometry: Studying
the impact of prior information in the location of an object
Submitted: 2016-08-03
Context. The best precision that can be achieved to estimate the location of
a stellar-like object is a topic of permanent interest in the astrometric
community.
Aims. We analyse bounds for the best position estimation of a stellar-like
object on a CCD detector array in a Bayesian setting where the position is
unknown, but where we have access to a prior distribution. In contrast to a
parametric setting where we estimate a parameter from observations, the
Bayesian approach estimates a random object (i.e., the position is a random
variable) from observations that are statistically dependent on the position.
Methods. We characterize the Bayesian Cramer-Rao (CR) that bounds the minimum
mean square error (MMSE) of the best estimator of the position of a point
source on a linear CCD-like detector, as a function of the properties of
detector, the source, and the background.
Results. We quantify and analyse the increase in astrometric performance from
the use of a prior distribution of the object position, which is not available
in the classical parametric setting. This gain is shown to be significant for
various observational regimes, in particular in the case of faint objects or
when the observations are taken under poor conditions. Furthermore, we present
numerical evidence that the MMSE estimator of this problem tightly achieves the
Bayesian CR bound. This is a remarkable result, demonstrating that all the
performance gains presented in our analysis can be achieved with the MMSE
estimator.
Conclusions The Bayesian CR bound can be used as a benchmark indicator of the
expected maximum positional precision of a set of astrometric measurements in
which prior information can be incorporated. This bound can be achieved through
the conditional mean estimator, in contrast to the parametric case where no
unbiased estimator precisely reaches the CR bound.