sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Dykaar, Hannah

Normalized to: Dykaar, H.

4 article(s) in total. 18 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.03459  [pdf] - 2025966
NuSTAR and Chandra observations of new X-ray transients in the central parsec of the Galaxy
Comments: 15 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2019-10-08
We report NuSTAR and Chandra observations of two X-ray transients, SWIFT J174540.7$-$290015 (T15) and SWIFT J174540.2$-$290037 (T37), which were discovered by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory in 2016 within $r\sim1$ pc of Sgr A*. NuSTAR detected bright X-ray outbursts from T15 and T37, likely in the soft and hard states, with 3-79~keV luminosities of $8\times10^{36}$ and $3\times10^{37}$ erg/s, respectively. No X-ray outbursts have previously been detected from the two transients and our Chandra ACIS analysis puts an upper limit of $L_X \lesssim 2 \times10^{31}$ erg/s on their quiescent 2-8 keV luminosities. No pulsations, significant QPOs, or type I X-ray bursts were detected in the NuSTAR data. While T15 exhibited no significant red noise, the T37 power density spectra are well characterized by three Lorentzian components. The declining variability of T37 above $\nu \sim 10$ Hz is typical of black hole (BH) transients in the hard state. NuSTAR spectra of both transients exhibit a thermal disk blackbody, X-ray reflection with broadened Fe atomic features, and a continuum component well described by Comptonization models. Their X-ray reflection spectra are most consistent with high BH spin ($a_{*} \gtrsim 0.9$) and large disk density ($n_e\sim10^{21}$ cm$^{-3}$). Based on the best-fit ionization parameters and disk densities, we found that X-ray reflection occurred near the inner disk radius, which was derived from the relativistic broadening and thermal disk component. These X-ray characteristics suggest the outbursting BH-LMXB scenario for both transients and yield the first BH spin measurements from X-ray transients in the central 100 pc region.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1803.08565  [pdf] - 1654574
Comment on: "Low significance of evidence for black hole echoes in gravitational wave data"
Comments: response to 1712.09966
Submitted: 2018-03-22
In a recent publication (1612.00266), we demonstrated that the events in the first observing run of the Advanced LIGO gravitational wave observatory (aLIGO O1) showed tentative evidence for repeating "echoes from the abyss" caused by Planck-scale structure near black hole horizons. By considering a phenomenological echo model, we showed that the pure noise hypothesis is disfavored with a p-value of 1%, i.e. higher amplitude for echoes than those in aLIGO O1 events are only recovered in 1% of random noise realizations. A recent preprint by Westerweck, et al. (1712.09966) provides a careful re-evaluation of our analysis which claims "a reduced statistical significance ... entirely consistent with noise". It is a mystery to us why the authors make such a statement, while they also find a p-value of 2 $\pm$ 1% (given the Poisson error in their estimate) for the same model and dataset. This is p-erfectly consistent with our results, which would be commonly considered as disfavoring the null hypothesis, or "moderate to significant" evidence for "echoes". Westerweck, et al. also point to diversity of the observed echo properties as evidence for statistical fluke, but such a diversity is neither unique nor surprising for complex physical phenomena in nature.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1612.00266  [pdf] - 1580771
Echoes from the Abyss: Tentative evidence for Planck-scale structure at black hole horizons
Comments: 13 pages, 13 figures, 2 tables, Extended discussions, PRD in press
Submitted: 2016-12-01, last modified: 2017-10-03
In classical General Relativity (GR), an observer falling into an astrophysical black hole is not expected to experience anything dramatic as she crosses the event horizon. However, tentative resolutions to problems in quantum gravity, such as the cosmological constant problem, or the black hole information paradox, invoke significant departures from classicality in the vicinity of the horizon. It was recently pointed out that such near-horizon structures can lead to late-time echoes in the black hole merger gravitational wave signals that are otherwise indistinguishable from GR. We search for observational signatures of these echoes in the gravitational wave data released by advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), following the three black hole merger events GW150914, GW151226, and LVT151012. In particular, we look for repeating damped echoes with time-delays of $8 M \log M$ (+spin corrections, in Planck units), corresponding to Planck-scale departures from GR near their respective horizons. Accounting for the "look elsewhere" effect due to uncertainty in the echo template, we find tentative evidence for Planck-scale structure near black hole horizons at false detection probability of $1\%$ (corresponding to $2.5\sigma$ significance level). Future observations from interferometric detectors at higher sensitivity, along with more physical echo templates, will be able to confirm (or rule out) this finding, providing possible empirical evidence for alternatives to classical black holes, such as in ${\it firewall}$ or ${\it fuzzball}$ paradigms.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1701.03485  [pdf] - 1534486
Echoes from the Abyss: The Holiday Edition!
Comments: Response to arXiv:1612.05625, 4 pages, 5 figures
Submitted: 2017-01-12
In a recent paper (arXiv:1612.00266), we reported the results of the first search for echoes from Planck-scale modifications of general relativity near black hole event horizons using the public data release by the Advanced LIGO gravitational wave observatory. While we found tentative evidence (at $\simeq 3 \sigma$ level) for the presence of these echoes, our statistical methodology was challenged by Ashton, et al. (arXiv:1612.05625), just in time for the holidays! In this short note, we briefly address these criticisms, arguing that they either do not affect our conclusion or change its significance by $\lesssim 0.3\sigma$. The real test will be whether our finding can be reproduced by independent groups using independent methodologies (and ultimately more data).