sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Dybczyński, P. A.

Normalized to: Dybczyński, P.

14 article(s) in total. 4 co-authors, from 1 to 12 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.09698  [pdf] - 2098851
The Catalogue of Cometary Orbits and their Dynamical Evolution
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures, public database: https://pad2.astro.amu.edu.pl/comets submitted for publication in A&A
Submitted: 2020-05-19
The new cometary catalogue containing data for almost 300 long-period comets that were discovered before 2018 is announced (the CODE catalogue). This is the first catalogue containing cometary orbits in five stages of their dynamical evolution, covering three successive passages through the perihelion, except the hyperbolic comets which are treated in a different manner. For about 100 of these long-period comets, their non-gravitational orbits are given, and for a comparison also their orbits obtained while neglecting the existence of non-gravitational acceleration are included. For many of the presented comets different orbital solutions, based on the alternative force models or various subsets of positional data are additionally given. The preferred orbit is always clearly indicated for each comet.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2003.02069  [pdf] - 2084178
A surprise in the updated list of stellar perturbers of long period comets motion
Comments: 12 pages, 3 figures, submitted to Astronomy and Astrophysics
Submitted: 2020-03-04, last modified: 2020-04-27
The second Gaia data release (Gaia DR2) provided us with the precise five-parameter astrometry for 1.3 billion of sources. As stars passing close to the Solar System are thought to be responsible for influencing the dynamical history of long period comets, we update and extend the list of stars that could potentially perturb motion of these comets. We aim to announce a publicly available database containing an up to date list of stars and stellar systems potentially perturbing long period comets motion. We add new objects and revise previously published lists. Special emphasis was placed on stellar systems. Discussion on masses estimation is included. Using the astrometry, preferably from Gaia DR2, augmented with data from other sources, we calculate spatial positions and velocities for each star. To filter studied objects on the basis of their minimal heliocentric distances we numerically integrate motion of stars under the Galactic potential and their mutual interactions. We announce the updated list of stellar perturbers of cometary motion, including masses of perturbers along with the publicly available database interface. These data are ready to be used with the observed long period comets orbits to study an individual influence of a whole sample of perturbers, or specific stars, on a dynamical past or future of a specific comet. 147 new perturbers were added in comparison to the previously published sources. We demonstrate that a new set of potential perturbers constitute an important tool in studies of cometary dynamics. The usage of our data significantly changes results of the past and future comet motion analysis. We point out a puzzling object in our list, star ALS 9243. The Gaia DR2 astrometry suggests a very close encounter of this star with the Sun however, its astrophysical parameters result in a completely different current distance of ALS 9243 and its large mass.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1909.10952  [pdf] - 2005503
Kruger 60 as a home system for 2I/Borisov -- a case study
Comments: 11 pages, 5 tables, 3 figures, a highly extended version
Submitted: 2019-09-24, last modified: 2019-11-26
For the second discovered interstellar comet 2I/Borisov we searched for a candidate for its home system. We will never be sure which star or stellar system does this comet come from but obtaining a very small relative velocity and a promisingly small miss-distance, when tracing the motion of 2I/Borisov back in time in its movement through the space, makes an encountered body a good candidate for a source of this comet. In our long-standing project on studying Oort spike comets dynamics, we recently updated a list of potential stellar perturbers of cometary motion. This list was checked against a past, close and slow encounter with 2I/Borisov. Only one object from among 647 stars or stellar systems in our list, a double star Kruger 60, appeared as a potential candidate for the origin of this comet. However, a detailed analysis of this system's radial velocity uncertainty influence on our result showed, that the probability that Kruger 60 is a home system of 2I/Borisov is small. Finally, the usage of a new, unpublished systemic radial velocity of Kruger 60 system practically ruled out this possibility.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1911.01735  [pdf] - 2026244
First stars that could significantly perturb comet motion are finally found
Comments: 10 pages, 13 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2019-11-05
Since 1950 when Oort published his paper on the structure of the cloud of comets it is believed that stars passing near this hypothetical cometary reservoir play an important role in the dynamical evolution of long period comets and injecting them into the observability region of the Solar System. The aim of this paper is to discuss two cases in which the data obtained from observations were used and stellar perturbations (of different intensity, strong case of C/2002 A3 LINEAR and weaker case of C/2013 F3 PANSTARRS) on cometary motion were detected. Using the best available data from the Gaia DR2 catalogue and some other sources we searched for close stellar passages near the Sun. Our study took into account that some of the stars are parts of multiple systems. Over 600 stars or systems that approached or will approach the Sun closer than 4.0 pc were found. Having the list of perturbers completed we studied their influence on a sample of 277 Oort spike comets that were observed since 1901 and discovered that two comets might have their orbits fundamentally changed due to a close stellar encounter. Our results show how much different the dynamical evolution of comets would have looked when their motion was considered only in the Galactic potential. Uncertainties both in stellar and cometary data were carefully taken into account. Our analysis indicates that the occurrence of stellar perturbations on cometary motions is very rare and the uncertainties of these effects are hard to estimate.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1901.01722  [pdf] - 1830622
Discovery statistics and the 1/a-distribution of long-period comets detected over the 1801-2017 period
Comments: accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Main Journal; 13 pages, 10 figures
Submitted: 2019-01-07
For the last two decades we have been observing a huge increase in discoveries of long-period comets (LPCs), especially those with large-perihelion distances. We collected data for a full sample of LPCs discovered over the 1801-2017 period including their osculating orbits, discovery moments (to study the discovery distances), and original semimajor axes (to study the number ratio of large-perihelion to small-perihelion LPCs in function of 1/a-original, and to construct the precise distribution of an 1/a-original). To minimize the influence of parabolic comets on these distributions we determined definitive orbits (which include eccentricities) for more than 20 LPCs previously classified as parabolic comets. We show that the percentage of large-perihelion comets is significantly higher within Oort spike comets than in a group of LPCs with a<10000 au, and this ratio of large-perihelion to small-perihelion comets for both groups has grown systematically since 1970. The different shape of the Oort spike for small-perihelion and large-perihelion LPCs is also discussed. A spectacular decrease of the ratio of large-perihelion to small-perihelion LPCs with the shortening of semimajor axis within the range of 5000-100 au is also noticed. Analysing discovery circumstances, we found that Oort spike comets are discovered statistically at larger geocentric and heliocentric distances than the remaining LPCs. This difference in the percentage of large-perihelion comets in both groups of LPCs can probably be a direct consequence of a well-known comets fading process due to ageing of their surface during the consecutive perihelion passages and/or reflects the different actual q-distributions.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1802.10380  [pdf] - 1785280
Note on the dynamical evolution of C/2017 K2 PANSTARRS
Comments: Previous version was published as "Dynamical evolution of C/2017 K2 PANSTARRS", Kr\'olikowska & Dybczy\'nsli, 2018, A&A, 615, A170 This version is supplemented by an Addendum (pages 5-6) which contains updated results based on new observations of this comet
Submitted: 2018-02-28, last modified: 2018-11-13
(Abreviated) Comet C/2017 K2 PANSTARRS drew attention to its activity already at a time of its discovery in May 2017 when it was about 16 au from the Sun. This Oort spike comet will approach its perihelion in December 2022, and the question about its dynamical past is one of the important issues to explore. To this aim it is necessary to obtain its precise osculating orbit, its original orbit, and propagate its motion backwards in time to the previous perihelion. We study a dynamical evolution of C/2017 K2 to the previous perihelion (backward calculations for about 3-4 Myr) as well as to the future (forward calculations for about 0.033 Myr). Outside the planetary system both Galactic and stellar perturbations were taken into account. We derived that C/2017 K2 is a dynamically old Oort spike comet (1/a$_{prev}$ = (48.7 $\pm$ 7,9) x10$^{-6}$ au$^{-1}$) with the previous perihelion distance below 10 au for 97 per cent of VCs (nominal q$_{prev}$ = 3.77 au). It means that C/2017 K2 has already visited our planetary zone during its previous perihelion passage. Thus, it is almost certainly a dynamically old Oort spike comet.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1810.12766  [pdf] - 1775820
Have we missed an interstellar comet four years ago?
Comments: Comments are welcome
Submitted: 2018-10-30
New orbit for C/2014 W10 PANSTARRS is obtained. High original eccentricity of e = 1.65 might suggest an interstellar origin of this comet. The probable reasons for missing this possible important event is discussed and a call for searching potential additional observations in various archives is proposed.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1711.06618  [pdf] - 1641341
On the dynamical history of the interstellar object 'Oumuamua?
Comments: 11 pages, 4 main tables and 3 tables with data, 8 figures, accepted for publication in A&A (v.4: rewritten and figures added)
Submitted: 2017-11-17, last modified: 2018-01-26
1I/2017 U1 'Oumuamua is the first interstellar object recorded inside the Solar System. We try to answer the main question: where does it come from? To this aim we searched for close encounters between 'Oumuamua and all nearby stars with known kinematic data during their past motion.We had checked over 200 thousand stars and found just a handful of candidates. If we limit our investigation to within a 60 pc sphere surrounding the Sun, then the most probable candidate for the 'Oumuamua parent stellar habitat is the star UCAC4 535-065571. However GJ 876 is also a favourable candidate. Moreover, the origin of 'Oumuamua from a much more distant source is still an open question. Additionally, we found that the quality of the original orbit of 'Oumuamua is accurate enough for such a study and that none of the checked stars had perturbed its motion significantly. All numerical results of this research are available in the Appendix.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1708.09248  [pdf] - 1587685
Oort spike comets with large perihelion distances
Comments: 41 pages, 20 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS (Accepted 2017 August 16. Received 2017 August 16; in original form 2017 March 28)
Submitted: 2017-08-30
The complete sample of large-perihelion nearly-parabolic comets discovered during the period 1901-2010 is studied starting from their orbit determination. Next, an orbital evolution that includes three perihelion passages (previous-observed-next) is investigated where a full model of Galactic perturbations and perturbations from passing stars have been incorporated. We show that the distribution of planetary perturbations suffered by actual large-perihelion comets during their passage through the Solar system has a deep, unexpected minimum around zero which indicates a lack of "almost unperturbed" comets. By a series of simulations we show that this deep well is moderately resistant to some diffusion of orbital elements of analysed comets. It seems reasonable to state that the observed stream of these large-perihelion comets experienced a series of specific planetary configurations when passing through the planetary zone. An analysis of the past dynamics of these comets clearly shows that dynamically new comets may appear only when their original semimajor axes are greater than 20 000 au. However, only for semimajor axes longer than 40 000 au dynamically old comets are completely not present. We demonstrated that the observed $1/a_{\rm ori}$ distribution exhibits a local minimum separating dynamically new from dynamically old comets. Long-term dynamical studies reveal a large variety of orbital behaviour. Several interesting examples of action of passing stars are also described, in particular the impact of Gliese 710 which will pass close to the Sun in the future. However, none of the obtained stellar perturbations is sufficient to change the dynamical status of analysed comets.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1604.07538  [pdf] - 1411532
New orbit recalculations of comet C/1890 F1 Brooks and its dynamical evolution
Comments: 15 pages, 9 figures; accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Main Journal
Submitted: 2016-04-26
C/1890 F1 Brooks belongs to a group of nineteen comets used by Jan Oort to support his famous hypothesis on the existence of a spherical cloud containing hundreds of billions of comets with orbits of semimajor axes between 50 and 150 thousand au. Comet Brooks stands out from this group because of a long series of astrometric observations as well as nearly two-year long observational arc. Rich observational material makes this comet an ideal target for testing the rationality of an effort to recalculate astrometric positions on the basis of original (comet-star)-measurements using modern star catalogues. This paper presents the results of such new analysis based on two different methods: (i) automatic re-reduction based on cometary positions and the (comet-star)-measurements, and (ii) partially automatic re-reduction based on the contemporary data for originally used reference stars. We show that both methods offer a significant reduction of orbital elements uncertainties. Based on the most preferred orbital solution, the dynamical evolution of comet Brooks during three consecutive perihelion passages is discussed. We conclude that C/1890 F1 is a dynamically old comet that passed the Sun at a distance below 5 au during its previous perihelion passage. Furthermore, its next perihelion passage will be a little closer than during the 1890-1892 apparition. C/1890 F1 is interesting also because it suffered extremely small planetary perturbations when it travelled through the planetary zone. Therefore, in the next passage through perihelion it will be once again a comet from the Oort spike.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1502.05518  [pdf] - 1224498
On the accuracy of close stellar approaches determination
Comments: 13 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-02-19
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the accuracy of our knowledge of close stellar passage distances in the pre-GAIA era.We used the most precise astrometric and kinematic data available at the moment and prepared a list of 40 stars nominally passing (in the past or future) closer than 2 pc from the Sun.We used a full gravitational potential of the Galaxy to calculate the motion of the Sun and a star from their current positions to the proximity epoch. For this calculations we used a numerical integration in rectangular, Galactocentric coordinates. We showed that in many cases the numerical integration of the star motion gives significantly different results than popular rectilinear approximation.We found several new stellar candidates for close visitors in past or in future. We used a covariance matrices of the astrometric data for each star to estimate the accuracy of the obtained proximity distance and epoch. To this aim we used a Monte Carlo method, replaced each star with 10 000 of its clones and studied the distribution of their individual close passages near the Sun. We showed that for contemporary close neighbours the precision is quite good but for more distant stars it strongly depends on the quality of astrometric and kinematic data. Several examples are discussed in detail, among them the case of HIP 14473. For this star we obtained the nominal proximity distance as small as 0.22 pc 3.78 Myr ago. However there exist strong need for more precise astrometry of this star since the proximity point uncertainty is unacceptably large.
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1501.00957  [pdf] - 1223862
Near-parabolic comets observed in 2006-2010. II. Their past and future motion under the influence of the Galaxy field and known nearby stars
Comments: 13 pages, 6 tables, 11 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-01-05
Here, we continue this research with a detailed study of their past and future motion during previous and next orbital periods under the perturbing action of our Galactic environment. At all stages of our dynamical study, we precisely propagate in time the observational uncertainties of cometary orbits. For the first time in our calculations, we fully take into account individual perturbations from all known stars or stellar systems that closely (less than 3.5 pc) approach the Sun during the cometary motion in the investigated time interval of several million years. This is done by means of a direct numerical integration of the N-body system comprising of a comet, the Sun and 90 potential stellar perturbers. We show a full review of various examples of individual stellar action on cometary motion. We conclude that perturbations from all known stars or stellar systems do not change the overall picture of the past orbit evolution of long-period comets (LPCs).The future motion of them might be seriously perturbed during the predicted close approach of Gliese 710 star but we do not observe significant energy changes. The importance of stellar perturbations is tested on the whole sample of 108 comets investigated by us so far and our previous results, obtained with only Galactic perturbations included, are fully confirmed.We present how our results can be used to discriminate between dynamically new and old near-parabolic comets and discuss the relevance of the so-called Jupiter-Saturn barrier phenomenon. Finally, we show how the Oort spike in the 1/a-distribution of near-parabolic comets is built from both dynamically new and old comets. We also point out that C/2007 W1 seems to be the first serious candidate for interstellar provenience.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1102.0154  [pdf] - 1051805
Where do long-period comets come from? Moving through Jupiter-Saturn barrier
Comments: 19 pages,16 figures, 11 tables, submitted to MNRAS
Submitted: 2011-02-01, last modified: 2011-04-03
Past and future dynamical evolution of all 64 long period comets having 1/aori< 1\times10-4 au-1 and qosc > 3.0 au and discovered after 1970 is studied. For all of them we obtained a new, homogeneous set of osculating orbits, including 15 orbits with detected non-gravitational parameters. The non-gravitational effects for eleven of these 15 comets have been determined for the first time. These were propagated numerically back and forth up to the 250 au heliocentric distance, constituting sets of original and future orbits together with their uncertainties. Next we followed the dynamical evolution under the Galactic tides for one orbital revolution to the past and future, obtaining orbital elements at previous/next perihelion passages. We obtained a clear dependence of the last revolution change in perihelion distance with respect to the 1/aori, what confirmed theoretical expectations. We show that about 50 per cent of all investigated comets have their previous perihelion distance below the 15 au limit. This resulted in classifying 31 comets as dynamically new, 26 as dynamically old and 7 having unclear status. We also present several examples of cometary motion through the Jupiter-Saturn barrier, some of them with the previous perihelion distance smaller than the observed one. New interpretations of the long period comets source pathways are also discussed in the light of suggestions of Kaib & Quinn (2009).
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1002.4397  [pdf] - 298966
Where do long-period comets come from? 26 comets from the non-gravitational Oort spike
Comments: Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2010-02-23
The apparent source region (or regions) of long-period comets as well as the definition of the dynamically new comet are still open questions.The aim of this investigation is to look for the apparent source of selected long period comets and to refine the definition of dynamically new comets. We show that incorporation of the non-gravitational forces into the orbit determination process significantly changes the situation. We determined precise non-gravitational orbits of all investigated comets and next followed numerically their past and future motion during one orbital period. Applying ingenious Sitarski's method of creating swarms of virtual comets compatible with observations, we were able to derive the uncertainties of original and future orbital elements, as well as the uncertainties of the previous and next perihelion distances. We concluded that the past and future evolution of cometary orbits under the Galactic tide perturbations is the only way to find which comets are really dynamically new. We also have shown that a significant percentage of long-period comets can visit the zone of visibility during at least two or three consecutive perihelion passages.