Normalized to: Dusini, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.02631 [pdf] - 2128527
Euclid preparation: VIII. The Complete Calibration of the
Colour-Redshift Relation survey: VLT/KMOS observations and data release
Euclid Collaboration;
Guglielmo, V.;
Saglia, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Galametz, A.;
Paltani, S.;
Bender, R.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Capak, P.;
Ilbert, O.;
Masters, D. C.;
Stern, D.;
Andreon, S.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Biviano, A.;
Bodendorf, C.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R. A.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Casas, S.;
Castellano, M.;
Castignani, G.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Ferreira, P. G.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gozaliasl, G.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hildebrandt, H.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Maraston, C.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Maurogordato, S.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Metcalf, R. Benton;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nakajima, R.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Pasian, F.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pocino, A.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Riccio, G.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sanchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespi, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Tramacere, A.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Wetzstein, M.;
Whittaker, L.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2020-07-06
The Complete Calibration of the Colour-Redshift Relation survey (C3R2) is a
spectroscopic effort involving ESO and Keck facilities designed to empirically
calibrate the galaxy colour-redshift relation - P(z|C) to the Euclid depth
(i_AB=24.5) and is intimately linked to upcoming Stage IV dark energy missions
based on weak lensing cosmology. The aim is to build a spectroscopic
calibration sample that is as representative as possible of the galaxies of the
Euclid weak lensing sample. In order to minimise the number of spectroscopic
observations to fill the gaps in current knowledge of the P(z|C),
self-organising map (SOM) representations of the galaxy colour space have been
constructed. Here we present the first results of an ESO@ VLT Large Programme
approved in the context of C3R2, which makes use of the two VLT optical and
near-infrared multi-object spectrographs, FORS2 and KMOS. This paper focuses on
high-quality spectroscopic redshifts of high-z galaxies observed with the KMOS
spectrograph in the H- and K-bands. A total of 424 highly-reliable z are
measured in the 1.3<=z<=2.5 range, with total success rates of 60.7% in the
H-band and 32.8% in the K-band. The newly determined z fill 55% of high and 35%
of lower priority empty SOM grid cells. We measured Halpha fluxes in a 1."2
radius aperture from the spectra of the spectroscopically confirmed galaxies
and converted them into star formation rates. In addition, we performed an SED
fitting analysis on the same sample in order to derive stellar masses, E(B-V),
total magnitudes, and SFRs. We combine the results obtained from the spectra
with those derived via SED fitting, and we show that the spectroscopic failures
come from either weakly star-forming galaxies (at z<1.7, i.e. in the H-band) or
low S/N spectra (in the K-band) of z>2 galaxies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.00055 [pdf] - 2087525
Euclid: The importance of galaxy clustering and weak lensing
cross-correlations within the photometric Euclid survey
Tutusaus, I.;
Martinelli, M.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Camera, S.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Casas, S.;
Blanchard, A.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sakr, Z.;
Ilić, S.;
Kunz, M.;
Carbone, C.;
Castander, F. J.;
Dournac, F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Kitching, T.;
Markovic, K.;
Mangilli, A.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sapone, D.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bender, R.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Costille, A.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Merlin, E.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Ntelis, P.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-04-30
The data from the Euclid mission will enable the measurement of the
photometric redshifts, angular positions, and weak lensing shapes for over a
billion galaxies. This large dataset will allow for cosmological analyses using
the angular clustering of galaxies and cosmic shear. The cross-correlation (XC)
between these probes can tighten constraints and it is therefore important to
quantify their impact for Euclid. In this study we carefully quantify the
impact of XC not only on the final parameter constraints for different
cosmological models, but also on the nuisance parameters. In particular, we aim
at understanding the amount of additional information that XC can provide for
parameters encoding systematic effects, such as galaxy bias or intrinsic
alignments (IA). We follow the formalism presented in Euclid Collaboration:
Blanchard et al. (2019) and make use of the codes validated therein. We show
that XC improves the dark energy Figure of Merit (FoM) by a factor $\sim 5$,
whilst it also reduces the uncertainties on galaxy bias by $\sim 17\%$ and the
uncertainties on IA by a factor $\sim 4$. We observe that the role of XC on the
final parameter constraints is qualitatively the same irrespective of the
galaxy bias model used. We also show that XC can help in distinguishing between
different IA models, and that if IA terms are neglected then this can lead to
significant biases on the cosmological parameters. We find that the XC terms
are necessary to extract the full information content from the data in future
analyses. They help in better constraining the cosmological model, and lead to
a better understanding of the systematic effects that contaminate these probes.
Furthermore, we find that XC helps in constraining the mean of the
photometric-redshift distributions, but it requires a more precise knowledge of
this mean in order not to degrade the final FoM. [Abridged]
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.07326 [pdf] - 2085090
Euclid: The reduced shear approximation and magnification bias for Stage
IV cosmic shear experiments
Deshpande, A. C.;
Kitching, T. D.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Taylor, P. L.;
Casas, S.;
Camera, S.;
Carbone, C.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Sakr, Z.;
Sapone, D.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Auricchio, N.;
Bodendorf, C.;
Bonino, D.;
Brescia, M.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Cropper, M.;
Dubath, F.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Franceschi, E.;
Fumana, M.;
Garilli, B.;
Grupp, F.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Mei, S.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Meylan, G.;
Moscardini, L.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirri, G.;
Starck, J. L.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2019-12-16, last modified: 2020-04-01
Stage IV weak lensing experiments will offer more than an order of magnitude
leap in precision. We must therefore ensure that our analyses remain accurate
in this new era. Accordingly, previously ignored systematic effects must be
addressed. In this work, we evaluate the impact of the reduced shear
approximation and magnification bias, on the information obtained from the
angular power spectrum. To first-order, the statistics of reduced shear, a
combination of shear and convergence, are taken to be equal to those of shear.
However, this approximation can induce a bias in the cosmological parameters
that can no longer be neglected. A separate bias arises from the statistics of
shear being altered by the preferential selection of galaxies and the dilution
of their surface densities, in high-magnification regions. The corrections for
these systematic effects take similar forms, allowing them to be treated
together. We calculated the impact of neglecting these effects on the
cosmological parameters that would be determined from Euclid, using cosmic
shear tomography. To do so, we employed the Fisher matrix formalism, and
included the impact of the super-sample covariance. We also demonstrate how the
reduced shear correction can be calculated using a lognormal field forward
modelling approach. These effects cause significant biases in Omega_m, sigma_8,
n_s, Omega_DE, w_0, and w_a of -0.53 sigma, 0.43 sigma, -0.34 sigma, 1.36
sigma, -0.68 sigma, and 1.21 sigma, respectively. We then show that these
lensing biases interact with another systematic: the intrinsic alignment of
galaxies. Accordingly, we develop the formalism for an intrinsic
alignment-enhanced lensing bias correction. Applying this to Euclid, we find
that the additional terms introduced by this correction are sub-dominant.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.07367 [pdf] - 2077067
Euclid: The selection of quiescent and star-forming galaxies using
observed colours
Bisigello, L.;
Kuchner, U.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Andreon, S.;
Bolzonella, M.;
Duc, P. -A.;
Garilli, B.;
Humphrey, A.;
Maraston, C.;
Moresco, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Tortora, C.;
Zamorani, G.;
Auricchio, N.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Corcione, L.;
Cropper, M. S.;
Dusini, S.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Franzetti, P.;
Fumana, M.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kitching, T.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Fèvre, O. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Massey, R.;
Masters, D. C.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Meylan, G.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Raison, F.;
Rhodes, J.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sauvage, M.;
Schneider, P.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sureau, F.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Wetzstein, M.;
Zoubian, J.
Submitted: 2020-03-16
The Euclid mission will observe well over a billion galaxies out to $z\sim6$
and beyond. This will offer an unrivalled opportunity to investigate several
key questions for understanding galaxy formation and evolution. The first step
for many of these studies will be the selection of a sample of quiescent and
star-forming galaxies, as is often done in the literature by using well known
colour techniques such as the `UVJ' diagram. However, given the limited number
of filters available for the Euclid telescope, the recovery of such rest-frame
colours will be challenging. We therefore investigate the use of observed
Euclid colours, on their own and together with ground-based u-band
observations, for selecting quiescent and star-forming galaxies. The most
efficient colour combination, among the ones tested in this work, consists of
the (u-VIS) and (VIS-J) colours. We find that this combination allows users to
select a sample of quiescent galaxies complete to above $\sim70\%$ and with
less than 15$\%$ contamination at redshifts in the range $0.75<z<1$. For
galaxies at high-z or without the u-band complementary observations, the
(VIS-Y) and (J-H) colours represent a valid alternative, with $>65\%$
completeness level and contamination below 20$\%$ at $1<z<2$ for finding
quiescent galaxies. In comparison, the sample of quiescent galaxies selected
with the traditional UVJ technique is only $\sim20\%$ complete at $z<3$, when
recovering the rest-frame colours using mock Euclid observations. This shows
that our new methodology is the most suitable one when only Euclid bands, along
with u-band imaging, are available.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.04310 [pdf] - 1994125
Euclid preparation: V. Predicted yield of redshift 7<z<9 quasars from
the wide survey
Euclid Collaboration;
Barnett, R.;
Warren, S. J.;
Mortlock, D. J.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Conselice, C.;
Hewett, P. C.;
Willott, C. J.;
Auricchio, N.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Camera, S.;
Capobianco, V.;
Carbone, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Clédassou, R.;
Congedo, G.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dusini, S.;
Ealet, A.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Garilli, B.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B. R.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kitching, T.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Laureijs, R.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maiorano, E.;
Mansutti, O.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Mauri, N.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, R. B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Neissner, C.;
Niemi, S. M.;
Nutma, T.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Paykari, P.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pettorino, V.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rix, H. -W.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Sapone, D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zamorani, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-08-12, last modified: 2019-11-05
We provide predictions of the yield of $7<z<9$ quasars from the Euclid wide
survey, updating the calculation presented in the Euclid Red Book in several
ways. We account for revisions to the Euclid near-infrared filter wavelengths;
we adopt steeper rates of decline of the quasar luminosity function (QLF;
$\Phi$) with redshift, $\Phi\propto10^{k(z-6)}$, $k=-0.72$, and a further
steeper rate of decline, $k=-0.92$; we use better models of the contaminating
populations (MLT dwarfs and compact early-type galaxies); and we use an
improved Bayesian selection method, compared to the colour cuts used for the
Red Book calculation, allowing the identification of fainter quasars, down to
$J_{AB}\sim23$. Quasars at $z>8$ may be selected from Euclid $OYJH$ photometry
alone, but selection over the redshift interval $7<z<8$ is greatly improved by
the addition of $z$-band data from, e.g., Pan-STARRS and LSST. We calculate
predicted quasar yields for the assumed values of the rate of decline of the
QLF beyond $z=6$. For the case that the decline of the QLF accelerates beyond
$z=6$, with $k=-0.92$, Euclid should nevertheless find over 100 quasars with
$7.0<z<7.5$, and $\sim25$ quasars beyond the current record of $z=7.5$,
including $\sim8$ beyond $z=8.0$. The first Euclid quasars at $z>7.5$ should be
found in the DR1 data release, expected in 2024. It will be possible to
determine the bright-end slope of the QLF, $7<z<8$, $M_{1450}<-25$, using 8m
class telescopes to confirm candidates, but follow-up with JWST or E-ELT will
be required to measure the faint-end slope. Contamination of the candidate
lists is predicted to be modest even at $J_{AB}\sim23$. The precision with
which $k$ can be determined over $7<z<8$ depends on the value of $k$, but
assuming $k=-0.72$ it can be measured to a 1 sigma uncertainty of 0.07.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.09273 [pdf] - 1983218
Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological
probes
Euclid Collaboration;
Blanchard, A.;
Camera, S.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V. F.;
Casas, S.;
Ilić, S.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Kitching, T.;
Kunz, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Linder, E.;
Majerotto, E.;
Markovič, K.;
Martinelli, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Pourtsidou, A.;
Sakr, Z.;
Sánchez, A. G.;
Sapone, D.;
Tutusaus, I.;
Yahia-Cherif, S.;
Yankelevich, V.;
Andreon, S.;
Aussel, H.;
Balaguera-Antolínez, A.;
Baldi, M.;
Bardelli, S.;
Bender, R.;
Biviano, A.;
Bonino, D.;
Boucaud, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Branchini, E.;
Brau-Nogue, S.;
Brescia, M.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Burigana, C.;
Cabanac, R.;
Capobianco, V.;
Cappi, A.;
Carretero, J.;
Carvalho, C. S.;
Casas, R.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castellano, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cimatti, A.;
Cledassou, R.;
Colodro-Conde, C.;
Congedo, G.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Conversi, L.;
Copin, Y.;
Corcione, L.;
Coupon, J.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Cropper, M.;
Da Silva, A.;
de la Torre, S.;
Di Ferdinando, D.;
Dubath, F.;
Ducret, F.;
Duncan, C. A. J.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Fabbian, G.;
Fabricius, M.;
Farrens, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fourmanoit, N.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Franzetti, P.;
Fumana, M.;
Galeotta, S.;
Gillard, W.;
Gillis, B.;
Giocoli, C.;
Gómez-Alvarez, P.;
Graciá-Carpio, J.;
Grupp, F.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Hormuth, F.;
Israel, H.;
Jahnke, K.;
Keihanen, E.;
Kermiche, S.;
Kirkpatrick, C. C.;
Kohley, R.;
Kubik, B.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Ligori, S.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lloro, I.;
Maino, D.;
Maiorano, E.;
Marggraf, O.;
Martinet, N.;
Marulli, F.;
Massey, R.;
Medinaceli, E.;
Mei, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Metcalf, B.;
Metge, J. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Moresco, M.;
Moscardini, L.;
Munari, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Niemi, S.;
Nucita, A. A.;
Padilla, C.;
Paltani, S.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W. J.;
Pires, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Poncet, M.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Racca, G. D.;
Raison, F.;
Renzi, A.;
Rhodes, J.;
Romelli, E.;
Roncarelli, M.;
Rossetti, E.;
Saglia, R.;
Schneider, P.;
Scottez, V.;
Secroun, A.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Tallada-Crespí, P.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tenti, M.;
Tereno, I.;
Toledo-Moreo, R.;
Torradeflot, F.;
Valenziano, L.;
Vassallo, T.;
Kleijn, G. A. Verdoes;
Viel, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2019-10-21
The Euclid space telescope will measure the shapes and redshifts of galaxies
to reconstruct the expansion history of the Universe and the growth of cosmic
structures. Estimation of the expected performance of the experiment, in terms
of predicted constraints on cosmological parameters, has so far relied on
different methodologies and numerical implementations, developed for different
observational probes and for their combination. In this paper we present
validated forecasts, that combine both theoretical and observational expertise
for different cosmological probes. This is presented to provide the community
with reliable numerical codes and methods for Euclid cosmological forecasts. We
describe in detail the methodology adopted for Fisher matrix forecasts, applied
to galaxy clustering, weak lensing and their combination. We estimate the
required accuracy for Euclid forecasts and outline a methodology for their
development. We then compare and improve different numerical implementations,
reaching uncertainties on the errors of cosmological parameters that are less
than the required precision in all cases. Furthermore, we provide details on
the validated implementations that can be used by the reader to validate their
own codes if required. We present new cosmological forecasts for Euclid. We
find that results depend on the specific cosmological model and remaining
freedom in each setup, i.e. flat or non-flat spatial cosmologies, or different
cuts at nonlinear scales. The validated numerical implementations can now be
reliably used for any setup. We present results for an optimistic and a
pessimistic choice of such settings. We demonstrate that the impact of
cross-correlations is particularly relevant for models beyond a cosmological
constant and may allow us to increase the dark energy Figure of Merit by at
least a factor of three.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06209 [pdf] - 1965163
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lemos, P.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-09-20
We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck
measurements of the CMB anisotropies. We find good consistency with the
standard spatially-flat 6-parameter $\Lambda$CDM cosmology having a power-law
spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted "base $\Lambda$CDM" in this
paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in
combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density $\Omega_c h^2 =
0.120\pm 0.001$, baryon density $\Omega_b h^2 = 0.0224\pm 0.0001$, scalar
spectral index $n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004$, and optical depth $\tau = 0.054\pm
0.007$ (in this abstract we quote $68\,\%$ confidence regions on measured
parameters and $95\,\%$ on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is
measured to $0.03\,\%$ precision, with $100\theta_*=1.0411\pm 0.0003$. These
results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable,
with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions.
Assuming the base-$\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the inferred late-Universe parameters
are: Hubble constant $H_0 = (67.4\pm 0.5)$km/s/Mpc; matter density parameter
$\Omega_m = 0.315\pm 0.007$; and matter fluctuation amplitude $\sigma_8 =
0.811\pm 0.006$. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the
base-$\Lambda$CDM model. Combining with BAO we constrain the effective extra
relativistic degrees of freedom to be $N_{\rm eff} = 2.99\pm 0.17$, and the
neutrino mass is tightly constrained to $\sum m_\nu< 0.12$eV. The CMB spectra
continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base
-$\Lambda$CDM at over $2\,\sigma$, which pulls some parameters that affect the
lensing amplitude away from the base-$\Lambda$CDM model; however, this is not
supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the
background geometry) BAO data. (Abridged)
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.06211 [pdf] - 1927941
Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Contreras, D.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Hooper, D. C.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
Lpez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, S. D. M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2018-07-17, last modified: 2019-08-02
We report on the implications for cosmic inflation of the 2018 Release of the
Planck CMB anisotropy measurements. The results are fully consistent with the
two previous Planck cosmological releases, but have smaller uncertainties
thanks to improvements in the characterization of polarization at low and high
multipoles. Planck temperature, polarization, and lensing data determine the
spectral index of scalar perturbations to be $n_\mathrm{s}=0.9649\pm 0.0042$ at
68% CL and show no evidence for a scale dependence of $n_\mathrm{s}.$ Spatial
flatness is confirmed at a precision of 0.4% at 95% CL with the combination
with BAO data. The Planck 95% CL upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio,
$r_{0.002}<0.10$, is further tightened by combining with the BICEP2/Keck Array
BK15 data to obtain $r_{0.002}<0.056$. In the framework of single-field
inflationary models with Einstein gravity, these results imply that: (a)
slow-roll models with a concave potential, $V" (\phi) < 0,$ are increasingly
favoured by the data; and (b) two different methods for reconstructing the
inflaton potential find no evidence for dynamics beyond slow roll.
Non-parametric reconstructions of the primordial power spectrum consistently
confirm a pure power law. A complementary analysis also finds no evidence for
theoretically motivated parameterized features in the Planck power spectrum, a
result further strengthened for certain oscillatory models by a new combined
analysis that includes Planck bispectrum data. The new Planck polarization data
provide a stringent test of the adiabaticity of the initial conditions. The
polarization data also provide improved constraints on inflationary models that
predict a small statistically anisotropic quadrupolar modulation of the
primordial fluctuations. However, the polarization data do not confirm physical
models for a scale-dependent dipolar modulation.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.12875 [pdf] - 1925231
Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-07-30
This paper describes the 2018 Planck CMB likelihoods, following a hybrid
approach similar to the 2015 one, with different approximations at low and high
multipoles, and implementing several methodological and analysis refinements.
With more realistic simulations, and better correction and modelling of
systematics, we can now make full use of the High Frequency Instrument
polarization data. The low-multipole 100x143 GHz EE cross-spectrum constrains
the reionization optical-depth parameter $\tau$ to better than 15% (in
combination with with the other low- and high-$\ell$ likelihoods). We also
update the 2015 baseline low-$\ell$ joint TEB likelihood based on the Low
Frequency Instrument data, which provides a weaker $\tau$ constraint. At high
multipoles, a better model of the temperature-to-polarization leakage and
corrections for the effective calibrations of the polarization channels
(polarization efficiency or PE) allow us to fully use the polarization spectra,
improving the constraints on the $\Lambda$CDM parameters by 20 to 30% compared
to TT-only constraints. Tests on the modelling of the polarization demonstrate
good consistency, with some residual modelling uncertainties, the accuracy of
the PE modelling being the main limitation. Using our various tests,
simulations, and comparison between different high-$\ell$ implementations, we
estimate the consistency of the results to be better than the 0.5$\sigma$
level. Minor curiosities already present before (differences between $\ell$<800
and $\ell$>800 parameters or the preference for more smoothing of the $C_\ell$
peaks) are shown to be driven by the TT power spectrum and are not
significantly modified by the inclusion of polarization. Overall, the legacy
Planck CMB likelihoods provide a robust tool for constraining the cosmological
model and represent a reference for future CMB observations. (Abridged)
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.05697 [pdf] - 1882757
Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity
Planck Collaboration;
Akrami, Y.;
Arroja, F.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Jung, G.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meerburg, P. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Münchmeyer, M.;
Natoli, P.;
Oppizzi, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Smith, K.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stanco, L.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2019-05-14
We analyse the Planck full-mission cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature and E-mode polarization maps to obtain constraints on primordial
non-Gaussianity (NG). We compare estimates obtained from separable
template-fitting, binned, and modal bispectrum estimators, finding consistent
values for the local, equilateral, and orthogonal bispectrum amplitudes. Our
combined temperature and polarization analysis produces the following results:
f_NL^local = -0.9 +\- 5.1; f_NL^equil = -26 +\- 47; and f_NL^ortho = - 38 +\-
24 (68%CL, statistical). These results include the low-multipole (4 <= l < 40)
polarization data, not included in our previous analysis, pass an extensive
battery of tests, and are stable with respect to our 2015 measurements.
Polarization bispectra display a significant improvement in robustness; they
can now be used independently to set NG constraints. We consider a large number
of additional cases, e.g. scale-dependent feature and resonance bispectra,
isocurvature primordial NG, and parity-breaking models, where we also place
tight constraints but do not detect any signal. The non-primordial lensing
bispectrum is detected with an improved significance compared to 2015,
excluding the null hypothesis at 3.5 sigma. We present model-independent
reconstructions and analyses of the CMB bispectrum. Our final constraint on the
local trispectrum shape is g_NLl^local = (-5.8 +\-6.5) x 10^4 (68%CL,
statistical), while constraints for other trispectra are also determined. We
constrain the parameter space of different early-Universe scenarios, including
general single-field models of inflation, multi-field and axion field
parity-breaking models. Our results provide a high-precision test for
structure-formation scenarios, in complete agreement with the basic picture of
the LambdaCDM cosmology regarding the statistics of the initial conditions
(abridged).
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.02487 [pdf] - 1580129
Planck intermediate results. LI. Features in the cosmic microwave
background temperature power spectrum and shifts in cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Narimani, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-08-08, last modified: 2017-04-21
The six parameters of the standard $\Lambda$CDM model have best-fit values
derived from the Planck temperature power spectrum that are shifted somewhat
from the best-fit values derived from WMAP data. These shifts are driven by
features in the Planck temperature power spectrum at angular scales that had
never before been measured to cosmic-variance level precision. We investigate
these shifts to determine whether they are within the range of expectation and
to understand their origin in the data. Taking our parameter set to be the
optical depth of the reionized intergalactic medium $\tau$, the baryon density
$\omega_{\rm b}$, the matter density $\omega_{\rm m}$, the angular size of the
sound horizon $\theta_*$, the spectral index of the primordial power spectrum,
$n_{\rm s}$, and $A_{\rm s}e^{-2\tau}$ (where $A_{\rm s}$ is the amplitude of
the primordial power spectrum), we examine the change in best-fit values
between a WMAP-like large angular-scale data set (with multipole moment
$\ell<800$ in the Planck temperature power spectrum) and an all angular-scale
data set ($\ell<2500$ Planck temperature power spectrum), each with a prior on
$\tau$ of $0.07\pm0.02$. We find that the shifts, in units of the 1$\sigma$
expected dispersion for each parameter, are $\{\Delta \tau, \Delta A_{\rm s}
e^{-2\tau}, \Delta n_{\rm s}, \Delta \omega_{\rm m}, \Delta \omega_{\rm b},
\Delta \theta_*\} = \{-1.7, -2.2, 1.2, -2.0, 1.1, 0.9\}$, with a $\chi^2$ value
of 8.0. We find that this $\chi^2$ value is exceeded in 15% of our simulated
data sets, and that a parameter deviates by more than 2.2$\sigma$ in 9% of
simulated data sets, meaning that the shifts are not unusually large. Comparing
$\ell<800$ instead to $\ell>800$, or splitting at a different multipole, yields
similar results. We examine the $\ell<800$ model residuals in the $\ell>800$
power spectrum data and find that the features there... [abridged]
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.09387 [pdf] - 1530762
Planck intermediate results. XLVIII. Disentangling Galactic dust
emission and cosmic infrared background anisotropies
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Soler, J. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-30, last modified: 2016-08-09
Using the Planck 2015 data release (PR2) temperature maps, we separate
Galactic thermal dust emission from cosmic infrared background (CIB)
anisotropies. For this purpose, we implement a specifically tailored
component-separation method, the so-called generalized needlet internal linear
combination (GNILC) method, which uses spatial information (the angular power
spectra) to disentangle the Galactic dust emission and CIB anisotropies. We
produce significantly improved all-sky maps of Planck thermal dust emission,
with reduced CIB contamination, at 353, 545, and 857 GHz. By reducing the CIB
contamination of the thermal dust maps, we provide more accurate estimates of
the local dust temperature and dust spectral index over the sky with reduced
dispersion, especially at high Galactic latitudes above $b = \pm 20{\deg}$. We
find that the dust temperature is $T = (19.4 \pm 1.3)$ K and the dust spectral
index is $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.1$ averaged over the whole sky, while $T = (19.4
\pm 1.5)$ K and $\beta = 1.6 \pm 0.2$ on 21 % of the sky at high latitudes.
Moreover, subtracting the new CIB-removed thermal dust maps from the
CMB-removed Planck maps gives access to the CIB anisotropies over 60 % of the
sky at Galactic latitudes $|b| > 20{\deg}$. Because they are a significant
improvement over previous Planck products, the GNILC maps are recommended for
thermal dust science. The new CIB maps can be regarded as indirect tracers of
the dark matter and they are recommended for exploring cross-correlations with
lensing and large-scale structure optical surveys. The reconstructed GNILC
thermal dust and CIB maps are delivered as Planck products.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.08633 [pdf] - 1530749
Planck intermediate results. XLIX. Parity-violation constraints from
polarization data
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carron, J.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Forastieri, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Natoli, P.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Patanchon, G.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Polastri, L.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Vittorio, N.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-05-27, last modified: 2016-08-05
Parity violating extensions of the standard electromagnetic theory cause in
vacuo rotation of the plane of polarization of propagating photons. This
effect, also known as cosmic birefringence, impacts the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) anisotropy angular power spectra, producing non-vanishing
$T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ correlations that are otherwise null when parity is a
symmetry. Here we present new constraints on an isotropic rotation,
parametrized by the angle $\alpha$, derived from Planck 2015 CMB polarization
data. To increase the robustness of our analyses, we employ two complementary
approaches, in harmonic space and in map space, the latter based on a peak
stacking technique. The two approaches provide estimates for $\alpha$ that are
in agreement within statistical uncertainties and very stable against several
consistency tests. Considering the $T$--$B$ and $E$--$B$ information jointly,
we find $\alpha = 0.31^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm
0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm syst.})$ from the harmonic analysis and $\alpha =
0.35^{\circ} \pm 0.05^{\circ} \, ({\rm stat.})\, \pm 0.28^{\circ} \, ({\rm
syst.})$ from the stacking approach. These constraints are compatible with no
parity violation and are dominated by the systematic uncertainty in the
orientation of Planck's polarization-sensitive bolometers.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.07335 [pdf] - 1538905
Planck intermediate results. L. Evidence for spatial variation of the
polarized thermal dust spectral energy distribution and implications for CMB
$B$-mode analysis
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Patrizii, L.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Sirri, G.;
Stanco, L.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-06-23
The characterization of the Galactic foregrounds has been shown to be the
main obstacle in the challenging quest to detect primordial B-modes in the
polarized microwave sky. We make use of the Planck-HFI 2015 data release at
high frequencies to place new constraints on the properties of the polarized
thermal dust emission at high Galactic latitudes. Here, we specifically study
the spatial variability of the dust polarized spectral energy distribution, and
its potential impact on the determination of the tensor-to-scalar ratio. We use
the correlation ratio of the $C_\ell^{BB}$ angular power spectra between the
217- and 353-GHz channels as a tracer of these potential variations, computed
on different high Galactic latitude regions, ranging from 80% to 20% of the
sky. The new insight from Planck data is a departure of the correlation ratio
from unity that cannot be attributed to a spurious decorrelation due to the
cosmic microwave background, instrumental noise, or instrumental systematics.
The effect is marginally detected on each region, but the statistical
combination of all the regions gives more than 99% confidence for this
variation in polarized dust properties. In addition, we show that the
decorrelation increases when there is a decrease in the mean column density of
the region of the sky being considered, and we propose a simple power-law
empirical model for this dependence, which matches what is seen in the Planck
data. We explore the effect that this measured decorrelation has on simulations
of the BICEP2-Keck Array/Planck analysis and show that the 2015 constraints
from those data still allow a decorrelation between the dust at 150 and 353GHz
of the order of the one we measure. Finally we show that either spatial
variation of the dust SED or of the dust polarization angle could produce
decorrelations between 217- and 353-GHz data similar to those we observe in the
data.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.01029 [pdf] - 1530576
Planck intermediate results. XLIV. The structure of the Galactic
magnetic field from dust polarization maps of the southern Galactic cap
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arzoumanian, D.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Benabed, K.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dupac, X.;
Dusini, S.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Ferrière, K.;
Finelli, F.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Guillet, V.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Huang, Z.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mauri, N.;
McEwen, J. D.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Moss, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Natoli, P.;
Neveu, J.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Oppermann, N.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Polenta, G.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Scott, D.;
Sirignano, C.;
Soler, J. D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Tenti, M.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Valiviita, J.;
Vansyngel, F.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2016-04-04
We study the statistical properties of interstellar dust polarization at high
Galactic latitude, using the Stokes parameter Planck maps at 353 GHz. Our aim
is to advance the understanding of the magnetized interstellar medium (ISM),
and to provide a model of the polarized dust foreground for cosmic microwave
background component-separation procedures. Focusing on the southern Galactic
cap, we examine the statistical distributions of the polarization fraction
($p$) and angle ($\psi$) to characterize the ordered and turbulent components
of the Galactic magnetic field (GMF) in the solar neighbourhood. We relate
patterns at large angular scales in polarization to the orientation of the mean
(ordered) GMF towards Galactic coordinates $(l_0,b_0)=(70^\circ \pm
5^\circ,24^\circ \pm 5^\circ)$. The histogram of $p$ shows a wide dispersion up
to 25 %. The histogram of $\psi$ has a standard deviation of $12^\circ$ about
the regular pattern expected from the ordered GMF. We use these histograms to
build a phenomenological model of the turbulent component of the GMF, assuming
a uniform effective polarization fraction ($p_0$) of dust emission. To model
the Stokes parameters, we approximate the integration along the line of sight
(LOS) as a sum over a set of $N$ independent polarization layers, in each of
which the turbulent component of the GMF is obtained from Gaussian realizations
of a power-law power spectrum. We are able to reproduce the observed $p$ and
$\psi$ distributions using: a $p_0$ value of (26 $\pm$ 3)%; a ratio of 0.9
$\pm$ 0.1 between the strengths of the turbulent and mean components of the
GMF; and a small value of $N$. We relate the polarization layers to the density
structure and to the correlation length of the GMF along the LOS.