GRB 051103 is considered to be a candidate soft gamma repeater (SGR) extragalactic giant magnetar flare by virtue of its proximity on the sky to M81/M82, as well as its time history, localization, and energy spectrum. We have derived a refined interplanetary network localization for this burst which reduces the size of the error box by over a factor of two. We examine its time history for evidence of a periodic component, which would be one signature of an SGR giant flare, and conclude that this component is neither detected nor detectable under reasonable assumptions. We analyze the time-resolved energy spectra of this event with improved time- and energy resolution, and conclude that although the spectrum is very hard, its temporal evolution at late times cannot be determined, which further complicates the giant flare association. We also present new optical observations reaching limiting magnitudes of R > 24.5, about 4 magnitudes deeper than previously reported. In tandem with serendipitous observations of M81 taken immediately before and one month after the burst, these place strong constraints on any rapidly variable sources in the region of the refined error ellipse proximate to M81. We do not find any convincing afterglow candidates from either background galaxies or sources in M81, although within the refined error region we do locate two UV bright star forming regions which may host SGRs. A supernova remnant (SNR) within the error ellipse could provide further support for an SGR giant flare association, but we were unable to identify any SNR within the error ellipse. These data still do not allow strong constraints on the nature of the GRB 051103 progenitor, and suggest that candidate extragalactic SGR giant flares will be difficult, although not impossible, to confirm.

Soft-gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) are galactic X-ray stars that emit numerous short-duration (about 0.1 s) bursts of hard X-rays during sporadic active periods. They are thought to be magnetars: strongly magnetized neutron stars with emissions powered by the dissipation of magnetic energy. Here we report the detection of a long (380 s) giant flare from SGR 1806-20, which was much more luminous than any previous transient event observed in our Galaxy. (In the first 0.2 s, the flare released as much energy as the Sun radiates in a quarter of a million years.) Its power can be explained by a catastrophic instability involving global crust failure and magnetic reconnection on a magnetar, with possible large-scale untwisting of magnetic field lines outside the star. From a great distance this event would appear to be a short-duration, hard-spectrum cosmic gamma-ray burst. At least a significant fraction of the mysterious short-duration gamma-ray bursts therefore may come from extragalactic magnetars.

Bright outbursts from Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGRs) and Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXPs) are believed to be caused by instabilities in ultramagnetized neutron stars, powered by a decaying magnetic field. It was originally thought that these outbursts were due to reconnection instabilities in the magnetosphere, reached via slow evolution of magnetic footpoints anchored in the crust. Later models considered sudden shifts in the crust's structure. Recent observations of magnetars give evidence that at least some outburst episodes involve rearrangements and/or energy releases within the star. We suggest that bursting episodes in magnetars are episodes of rapid plastic yielding in the crust, which trigger "swarms" of reconnection instabilities in the magnetosphere. Magnetic energy always dominates; elastic energy released within the crust does not generate strong enough Alfven waves to power outbursts. We discuss the physics of SGR giant flares, and describe recent observations which give useful constraints and clues.

After a couple of years of quiescence, the soft gamma repeater SGR 1900+14 suddenly reactivated on 18 April 2001, with the emission of a very intense, long and modulated flare, only second in intensity and duration to the 27 August 1998 giant flare. BeppoSAX caught the large flare with its Gamma Ray Burst Monitor and with one of the Wide Field Cameras. The Wide Field Cameras also detected X-ray bursting activity shortly before the giant flare. A target of opportunity observation was started only 8 hours after the large flare with the Narrow Field Instruments, composed of two 60-ks long pointings. These two observations show an X-ray afterglow of the persistent SGR 1900+14 source, decaying with time according to a power law of index -0.6.

(ABBREVIATED) The extraordinary 1998 August 27 giant flare places strong constraints on the physical properties of its source, SGR 1900+14. We make detailed comparisons of the published data with the magnetar model. The giant flare evolved through three stages, whose radiative mechanisms we address in turn. A triggering mechanism is proposed, whereby a helical distortion of the core magnetic field induces large-scale fracturing in the crust and a twisting deformation of the crust and exterior magnetic field. The envelope of the pulsating tail of the August 27 flare can be accurately fit, after ~40 s, by the contracting surface of a relativistically hot, but inhomogeneous, trapped fireball. We quantify the effects of direct neutrino-pair emission, thereby deducing a lower bound ~ 10^{32} G-cm^3 to the magnetic moment of the confining field. The radiative flux during the intermediate ~40 s of the burst appears to exceed the trapped fireball fit. The spectrum and lightcurve of this smooth tail are consistent with heating in an extended pair corona, possibly powered by continuing seismic activity in the star. We consider in detail the critical luminosity, below which a stable balance can be maintained between heating and radiative cooling in a confined, magnetized pair plasma; but above which the confined plasma runs away to local thermodynamic equilibrium. In the later pulsating tail, the best fit temperature equilibrates at a value which agrees well with the regulating effect of photon splitting. The remarkable four-peaked substructure within each 5.16-s pulse provides strong evidence for the presence of higher magnetic multipoles in SGR 1900+14. The corresponding collimation of the X-ray flux is related to radiative transport in a super-QED magnetic field.

Marsden, Lingenfelter, Rothschild & Higdon have given arguments against the magnetar model for Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGRs) and Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXPs), as forcefully advocated by R. Rothschild at this meeting. We critique these arguments, showing: (1) The claim that SGRs and AXPs are born in unusually dense regions of the ISM is not supported in any compelling way by observations. (2) Even if this claim were true, it would not argue against the magnetar model. Moreover, all observations can be accounted for if magnetars have shorter observable lifetimes than do radiopulsars, in agreement with theoretical expectations, but no systematically different ambient ISM densities. (3) The suggestion that accretion onto the neutron star is directly influenced by the ISM in a way that explains the difference between SGRs/AXPs and radiopulsars, is not possible. The mass inflow rate during later stages of supernova remnant expansion when accretion can be influenced by backpressure from the ISM is many orders of magnitude too small. (4) Accretion-based models are unable to account for the hyper-Eddington bursts and flares which are the defining characteristic of SGRs. (5) Accretion disk models also predict optical and IR emission with higher luminosities than are observed.

We study the temporal and coarse spectral properties of 268 bursts from SGR 1806-20 and 679 bursts from SGR 1900+14, all observed with the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer/Proportional Counter Array. Hardness ratios and temporal parameters, such as T_90 durations and tau_90 emission times are determined for these bursts. We find a lognormal distribution of burst durations, ranging over more than two orders of magnitude: T_90 ~ 10^-2 to >~ 1 s, with a peak at ~ 0.1 s. The burst light curves tend to be asymmetrical, with more than half of all events showing rise times t_r < 0.3 T_90. We find that there exists a correlation between the duration and fluence of bursts from both sources. We also find a significant anti-correlation between hardness ratio and fluence for SGR 1806-20 bursts and a marginal anti-correlation for SGR 1900+14 events. Finally, we discuss possible physical implications of these results within the framework of the magnetar model.

The prototype for events that we call MFs - "March Fifth" events or "Magnetar Flares" - was observed on March 5, 1979. There is evidence that MFs are powered by catastrophic magnetic instabilities in ultramagnetized neutron stars. These events begin with brief (~ 0.1 - 1 s), intense, hard spikes of gamma rays followed by long (~ 100 s) softer tails of hard X-rays, modulated on the stellar rotation period. Prototypical MFs could have been detected by BATSE out to ~ 13 Mpc, nearly reaching the Virgo cluster. The likely number of isotropic, standard-candle MFs detected by the BATSE experiment is ~ 12. Bayes' Theorem implies that there is a 99% chance for at least 1 MF in the BATSE catalog, and a 16% chance for more than 20. These short-duration, fast-rising gamma-ray bursts could in principle be identified by their positional coincidences with nearby galaxies. The ensuing soft tail emission would not have been detected by BATSE for sources more distant than M31. It is possible that MFs also emit an intense, hard, BEAMED component during the intial spike phase. If this beamed component has opening angle ~ 8 degrees and peak luminosity comparable to the power of the isotropic component, then BATSE would detect such beamed sources out to redshift z ~ 0.1, at a full-sky rate of ~ 100 yr^-1. We speculate that such beamed MFs could account for the short, hard Class II gamma-ray bursts in the BATSE catalog, or some significant subset of them. If true, then Class II GRBs positions would correlate with the positions of galaxies and galaxy clusters within ~ 350 Mpc.

The giant flare of 1998 August 27 from SGR 1900+14 was extraordinary in many ways: it was the most intense flux of gamma rays ever detected from a source outside our solar system; it was longer than any previously detected burst from a soft gamma repeater (SGR) in our Galaxy by more than an order of magnitude; and it showed a remarkable four-peaked, periodic pattern in hard X-rays with the same rotation period that was found modulating soft X-rays from the star in quiescence. The event was detected by several gamma-ray experiments in space, including the Ulysses gamma-ray burst detector and the BeppoSAX Gamma Ray Burst Monitor. These instruments operate in different energy ranges, and comparisons of their measurements reveal complex patterns of spectral evolution as the intensity varies. In this paper, we present a joint analysis of the BeppoSAX and Ulysses data and discuss some implications of these results for the SGRs. We also present newly-analyzed Venera/SIGNE and ISEE-3 data on the 1979 March 5 giant flare from an SGR in the Large Magellanic Cloud (SGR 0526-66), and compare them with the August 27 event. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that giant flares are due to catastrophic magnetic instabilities in highly magnetized neutron stars, or "magnetars".

The Soft Gamma Repeater SGR 1900+14 entered a remarkable phase of activity during the summer of 1998. This activity peaked on August 27, 1998 when a giant periodic gamma-ray flare resembling the famous March 5, 1979 event from SGR 0526-66 was recorded. Two days later (August 29), a strong, bright burst was detected with RXTE and BATSE. This event reveals several similarities to the giant flares of August 27 and March 5, and shows a number of unique features not previously seen in SGR bursts. Unlike typically short SGR bursts, this event features a 3.5 s burst peak that was preceded by an extended (~ 1 s) complex precursor, and followed by a long (~ 1000 s) periodic tail modulated at the 5.16 s stellar rotation period. Spectral analysis shows a striking distinction between the spectral behavior of the precursor, burst peak and extended tail. While the spectrum during the peak is uniform, a significant spectral evolution is detected in both the precursor and tail emissions. Temporal behavior shows a sharp rise (~ 9.8 ms) at the event onset and a rapid cutoff (~ 17 ms) at the end of the burst peak. The tail pulsations show a simple pulse profile consisting of one 5.16 s peak that did not evolve with time. The spectral and temporal signatures of this event imply that the precursor, main peak, and extended tail are produced by different physical mechanisms. We discuss these features and their implications in the context of the magnetar model. The energetics of the August 29 event, and its close proximity to the August 27 flare, suggest that it is an `aftershock' of the preceding giant flare. "P.S. This is an abbreviated version of the original abstract."

We have phase connected a sequence of RXTE PCA observations of SGR 1806-20 covering 178 days. We find a simple secular spin-down model does not adequately fit the data. The period derivative varies gradually during the observations between 8.1 and 11.7 * 10^-11 s/s (at its highest, ~40% larger than the long term trend), while the average burst rate as seen with BATSE drops throughout the time interval. The phase residuals give no compelling evidence for periodicity, but more closely resemble timing noise as seen in radio pulsars. The magnitude of the timing noise, however, is large relative to the noise level typically found in radio pulsars. Combining these results with the noise levels measured for some AXPs, we find all magnetar candidates have \Delta_8 values larger than those expected from a simple extrapolation of the correlation found in radio pulsars. We find that the timing noise in SGR 1806-20 is greater than or equal to the levels found in some accreting systems (e.g., Vela X-1, 4U 1538-52 and 4U 1626-67), but the spin-down of SGR 1806-20 has thus far maintained coherence over 6 years. Alternatively, an orbital model with a period P_orb = 733 days provides a statistically acceptable fit to the data. If the phase residuals are created by Doppler shifts from a gravitationally bound companion, then the allowed parameter space for the mass function (small) and orbital separation (large) rule out the possibility of accretion from the companion sufficient to power the persistent emission from the SGR.

In magnetic fields stronger than B_Q = 4.4 X 10^13 Gauss, an electron's Landau excitation energy exceeds its rest energy. I review the physics of this strange regime and some of its implications for the crusts and magneto- spheres of neutron stars. In particular, I describe how ultra-strong fields >> render the vacuum birefringent and capable of distorting and magnifying images ("magnetic lensing"); >> change the self-energy of electrons: as B increases they are first slightly lighter than $m_e$, then slightly heavier; >> cause photons to rapidly split and merge with each other; >> distort atoms into long, thin cylinders and molecules into strong, polymer-like chains; >> enhance the pair density in thermal pair-photon gases; >> strongly suppress photon-electron scattering, and >> drive the vacuum itself unstable, at extremely large B. In a concluding section, I discuss recent observations of the spindown histories of soft gamma repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars. The magnetar model gives a promising framework for understanding these data.

We present statistics of SGR 1806-20 bursts, combining 290 events detected with RXTE/PCA, 111 events detected with BATSE and 134 events detected with ICE. We find that the fluence distribution of bursts observed with each instrument are well described by power laws with indices 1.43, 1.76 and 1.67, respectively. The distribution of time intervals between successive bursts from SGR 1806-20 is described by a lognormal function with a peak at 103 s. There is no correlation between the burst intensity and either the waiting times till the next burst or the time elapsed since the previous burst. In all these statistical properties, SGR 1806-20 bursts resemble a self-organized critical system, similar to earthquakes and solar flares. Our results thus support the hypothesis that the energy source for SGR bursts is crustquakes due to the evolving, strong magnetic field of the neutron star, rather than any accretion or nuclear power.

The extraordinary giant flare of 1998 August 27 from SGR 1900+14 was the most intense event ever detected from this or any other cosmic source (even more intense than the famous March 5th 1979 event). It was longer than any previous burst from SGR1900+14 by more than one order of magnitude, and it displayed the same 5.16-s periodicity in hard X-rays that was detected in the low energy X-ray flux of its quiescent counterpart. The event was detected by several gamma-ray experiments in space, among them the Ulysses gamma-ray burst detector and the BeppoSAX Gamma Ray Burst Monitor. These instruments operate in different energy ranges, and a comparison of their data shows that the event emitted a strongly energy-dependent flux, and displayed strong spectral evolution during the outburst itself. Here we present a joint analysis of the BeppoSAX and Ulysses data, in order to identify the energy-dependent features of this event and understand some of the physical conditions in the environment of the neutron star which generated this flare.

We study the statistics of soft gamma repeater (SGR) bursts, using a data base of 187 events detected with BATSE and 837 events detected with RXTE PCA, all from SGR 1900+14 during its 1998-1999 active phase. We find that the fluence or energy distribution of bursts is consistent with a power law of index 1.66, over 4 orders of magnitude. This scale-free distribution resembles the Gutenberg-Richter Law for earthquakes, and gives evidence for self-organized criticality in SGRs. The distribution of time intervals between successive bursts from SGR 1900+14 is consistent with a log-normal distribution. There is no correlation between burst intensity and the waiting times till the next burst, but there is some evidence for a correlation between burst intensity and the time elapsed since the previous burst. We also find a correlation between the duration and the energy of the bursts, but with significant scatter. In all these statistical properties, SGR bursts resemble earthquakes and solar flares more closely than they resemble any known accretion-powered or nuclear-powered phenomena. Thus our analysis lends support to the hypothesis that the energy source for SGR bursts is internal to the neutron star, and plausibly magnetic.

We present evidence for burst emission from SGR 1900+14 with a power-law high energy spectrum extending beyond 500 keV. Unlike previous detections of high energy photons during bursts from SGRs, these emissions are not associated with high-luminosity burst intervals. Not only is the emission hard, but the spectra are better fit by Band's GRB function rather than by the traditional optically-thin thermal bremsstrahlung model. We find that the spectral evolution within these hard events obeys a hardness/intensity anti-correlation. Temporally, these events are distinct from typical SGR burst emissions in that they are longer (~ 1 s) and have relatively smooth profiles. Despite a difference in peak luminosity of > 1E+11 between these bursts from SGR 1900+14 and cosmological GRBs, there are striking temporal and spectral similarities between the two kinds of bursts, aside from spectral evolution. We outline an interpretation of these events in the context of the magnetar model.

We consider the physical implications of the rapid spindown of Soft Gamma Repeater 1900+14, and of the apparent "braking glitch", \Delta P/P = l x 10^-4, that was concurrent with the Aug. 27th giant flare. A radiation-hydrodynamical outflow associated with the flare could impart the required torque, but only if the dipole magnetic field is stronger than ~ 10^14 G and the outflow lasts longer and/or is more energetic than the observed X-ray flare. A positive period increment is also a natural consequence of a gradual, plastic deformation of the neutron star crust by an intense magnetic field, which forces the neutron superfluid to rotate more slowly than the crust. Sudden unpinning of the neutron vortex lines during the August 27th event would then induce a glitch opposite in sign to those observed in young pulsars, but of a much larger magnitude as a result of the slower rotation. The change in the persistent X-ray lightcurve following the August 27 event is ascribed to continued particle heating in the active region of that outburst. The enhanced X-ray output can be powered by a steady current flowing through the magnetosphere, induced by the twisting motion of the crust. The long term rate of spindown appears to be accelerated with respect to a simple magnetic dipole torque. Accelerated spindown of a seismically-active magnetar will occur when its persistent output of Alfven waves and particles exceeds its spindown luminosity. We suggest that SGRs experience some episodes of relative inactivity, with diminished spindown rates, and that such inactive magnetars are observed as Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXPs). The rapid reappearence of persistent X-ray emission following August 27 flare gives evidence against accretion-powered models.

We have analyzed Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer Proportional Counter Array observations of the pulsed emission from SGR 1900+14 during September 1996, June - October 1998, and early 1999. Using these measurements and results reported elsewhere, we construct a period history of this source for 2.5 years. We find significant deviations from a steady spin-down trend during quiescence and the burst active interval. Burst and Transient Source Experiment observations of the burst emission are presented and correlations between the burst activity and spin-down rate of SGR 1900+14 are discussed. We find an 80 day interval during the summer of 1998 when the average spin-down rate is larger than the rate elsewhere by a factor ~ 2.3. This enhanced spin-down may be the result of a discontinuous spin-down event or ``braking glitch'' at the time of the giant flare on 27 August 1998. Furthermore, we find a large discrepancy between the pulsar period and average spin-down rate in X-rays as compared to radio observations for December 1998 and January 1999.

The soft-gamma repeater SGR 1900+14 became active again on June 1998 after a long period of quiescence; it remained at a low state of activity until August 1998, when it emitted a series of extraordinarily intense outbursts. We have observed the source with RXTE twice, during the onset of each active episode. We confirm the pulsations at the 5.16 s period reported earlier (Hurley et al. 1998b, Hurley et al. 1998 e) from SGR 1900+14. Here we report the detection of a secular spindown of the pulse period at an average rate of 1.1*10^{-10} s/s. In view of the strong similarities between SGRs, we attribute the spindown of SGR 1900+14 to magnetic dipole radiation, possibly accelerated by a quiescent flux, as in the case of SGR 1806-20 (Kouveliotou et al. 1998a). This allows an estimate of the pulsar dipolar magnetic field, which is 2-8*10^{14} G. Our results confirm that SGRs are magnetars.

There is evidence that soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) are neutron stars which experience frequent starquakes, possibly driven by an evolving, ultra-strong magnetic field. The empirical power-law distribution of SGR burst energies, analogous to the Gutenberg-Richter law for earthquakes, exhibits a turn-over at high energies consistent with a global limit on the crust fracture size. With such large starquakes occurring, the significant excitation of global seismic oscillations (GSOs) seems likely. Moreover, GSOs may be self-exciting in a stellar crust that is strained by many, randomly-oriented stresses. We explain why low-order toroidal modes, which preserve the shape of the star and have observable frequencies as low as ~ 30 Hz, may be especially susceptible to excitation. We estimate the eigenfrequencies as a function of stellar mass and radius, and their magnetic and rotational shiftings/splittings. We also describes ways in which these modes might be detected and damped. There is marginal evidence for 23 ms oscillations in the hard initial pulse of the 1979 March 5th event. This could be due to the $_3t_0$ mode in a neutron star with B ~ 10^{14} G or less; or it could be the fundamental toroidal mode if the field in the deep crust of SGR 0526-66 is ~ 4 X 10^{15} G, in agreement with other evidence. If confirmed, GSOs would give corroborating evidence for crust-fracturing magnetic fields in SGRs: B >~ 10^{14} G.

We consider a model for gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) from high-velocity neutron stars in the galactic halo. In this model, bursters are born in the galactic disk with large recoil velocities V_r, and GRBs are beamed to within emission cones of half-angle \phi centered on V_r. We describe scenarios for magnetically -channeled GRBs that have such beaming characteristics. We then make detailed comparisons of this halo beaming model (HBM) to BATSE and PVO data for GRB intensity & angular position distributions. Acceptable fits to observations of over 1000 bursts are obtained for \phi = 15 - 30 degrees and for a BATSE sampling depth ~ 180 kpc. Present data favor a truly isotropic (cosmological) model over the HBM, but not by a statistically compelling margin. Bursters born in nearby external galaxies, such as M31, are almost entirely undetectable in the HBM because of misdirected beaming. We analyze several refinements of the basic HBM: gamma-ray intensities that vary with angle from the beam axis; non-standard-candle GRB luminosity functions; and models including a subset of bursters that do not escape from the galaxy. We also discuss the energy budgets for the bursters, the origins of their recoils, and the physics of burst beaming and alignment. One possible physical model is based on the magnetar model of soft gamma repeaters (SGRs). Empirical bounds on the rate of formation and peculiar velocities of SGRs imply that there exist ~ 10^4 to ~ 10^7 aged SGRs in the galactic halo within a distance of 100 kpc. The HBM gives an acceptable fit to observations only if it satisfies certain conditions (e.g. \phi ~ 20 deg) which are possible, but for which there exist no clear & compelling theoretical justifications. The cosmological burster hypothesis is more generic and thus more attractive in this sense. (Abbreviated Abstract).

We describe a robust Bayesian statistical method for determining Lyman alpha forest cloud sizes in spherical and in thin disk geometries, using absorption in adjacent sightlines toward closely separated QSO pairs and groups, apply this method to the available data, and discuss implications of our results for models of Ly alpha clouds. Under the assumption of a population of uniform- size and unclustered clouds, the data from Q1343+2640A/B give a 99% confidence lower and upper bounds 61<R<533 kpc/h on the radius of spherical clouds at z about 1.8, with a median value of 149 kpc/h [$(\Omega_0, \Lambda_0) =(1,0)$]. The baryonic mass of such large clouds is comparable to that of dwarf irregular galaxies. Their cosmic overdensity is close to the turn-around density but generally below the virialization density, suggesting a population of gravi- tationally bound but unvirialized protogalactic objects at z about 2. Their comoving volume density is similar to that of the faint blue galaxies (FBGs) at the limiting magnitude B of 26-27. The dynamical collapsing timescale of over- densities like these clouds is also comparable with the cosmic time difference between z of 2 to 1. Both populations of objects show similar weak clustering in space. All this evidence suggests a possible identification of Ly alpha clouds as the collapsing progenitors of the FBGs at z about 1. We also investigate the other QSO pairs: Q0307-1931/1932, Q0107-0232/0235, and the triplet of Q1623+268. Imposing an uniform W_0 > 0.4 A threshold on all linelists, we find a trend of larger inferred cloud radius with larger proper separation of QSO pairs, significant at the 3.4 sigma level. This indicates that the idealization of unclustered, uniform-sized clouds does not accurately describe the Ly alpha cloud population.

We have obtained spectroscopy of Q 1343+266 AB, a pair of quasars at redshift z = 2.03 with a projected separation of 9.5 arcseconds. This system is well-suited for probing the Ly-alpha forest, since the two component spectra show several Ly-alpha lines in common and several others not. Using Bayesian statistics, under the idealization of uniform-radius spherical absorbers, we find that the Ly-alpha cloud radius at $z \approx 1.8$ lies in the range $40\hkpc < R < 280 \hkpc$ with $98\%$ confidence in a $(\Omega_o, \Lambda_o) = (1, 0)$ model universe, where $h =(H_o / 100 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1})$. The median value of R is 90 h^-1 kpc. \ These numbers scale up by a factor 1.44 for $(\Omega_o, \Lambda_o) =(0.1, 0)$; and by a factor 1.85 for (0.1, 0.9). Pressure-confined and freely-expanding Ly-alpha cloud models in which the absorbers formed in a significantly more compressed state at $z \gg 2$ are contradicted by these new data, as are models involving stably-confined gas concentrations in photoionization equilibrium within minihalos of cold dark matter. The comoving density of Ly-alpha forest objects at $z\sim 2$ is $\sim 0.3 h (R/100 kpc)^{-2} Mpc^{-3}$ in a (1,0) model universe. This suggests a possible identification of Ly-alpha clouds with the unvirialized, collapsing progenitors of the faint, blue galaxies at $z\sim 1$.

We present spectra of QSOs 1343+266 A B, covering Ly-beta to C~IV emission at 2\AA~resolution, and find further evidence that this system is not gravitationally lensed. We see, however, a large number of Ly-alpha and some C~IV absorption features common to both spectra. The frequency of C~IV lines in common indicates that these absorbers have a radius close to the sightline separation, $39~h^{-1}$kpc ($q_o=0.5$), implying a spatial number density of these absorbers the same as current day $L>0.3L_*$ galaxies. Furthermore, the velocity mismatch for C~IV systems indicates absorber masses in the range $10^{11}~M_{\odot} < M < 10^{12}~M_{\odot}$. These results confirm that typical galaxies cause QSO C~IV-line absorption. A complete line-list of metal-lines and the Ly-alpha forest is presented