Normalized to: Duchemin, Y.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.00045 [pdf] - 1255082
Astrometric positions for 18 irregular satellites of giant planets from
23 years of observations
Gomes-JĂșnior, A. R.;
Assafin, M.;
Vieira-Martins, R.;
Arlot, J. -E.;
Camargo, J. I. B.;
Braga-Ribas, F.;
Neto, D. N. da Silva;
Andrei, A. H.;
Dias-Oliveira, A.;
Morgado, B. E.;
Benedetti-Rossi, G.;
Duchemin, Y.;
Desmars, J.;
Lainey, V.;
Thuillot, W.
Submitted: 2015-05-29
The irregular satellites of the giant planets are believed to have been
captured during the evolution of the solar system. Knowing their physical
parameters, such as size, density, and albedo is important for constraining
where they came from and how they were captured. The best way to obtain these
parameters are observations in situ by spacecrafts or from stellar occultations
by the objects. Both techniques demand that the orbits are well known. We aimed
to obtain good astrometric positions of irregular satellites to improve their
orbits and ephemeris. We identified and reduced observations of several
irregular satellites from three databases containing more than 8000 images
obtained between 1992 and 2014 at three sites (Observat\'orio do Pico dos Dias,
Observatoire de Haute-Provence, and European Southern Observatory - La Silla).
We used the software PRAIA (Platform for Reduction of Astronomical Images
Automatically) to make the astrometric reduction of the CCD frames. The UCAC4
catalog represented the International Celestial Reference System in the
reductions. Identification of the satellites in the frames was done through
their ephemerides as determined from the SPICE/NAIF kernels. Some procedures
were followed to overcome missing or incomplete information (coordinates,
date), mostly for the older images. We managed to obtain more than 6000
positions for 18 irregular satellites: 12 of Jupiter, 4 of Saturn, 1 of Uranus
(Sycorax), and 1 of Neptune (Nereid). For some satellites the number of
obtained positions is more than 50\% of what was used in earlier orbital
numerical integrations. Comparison of our positions with recent JPL ephemeris
suggests there are systematic errors in the orbits for some of the irregular
satellites. The most evident case was an error in the inclination of Carme.