Normalized to: Drimmel, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.10471 [pdf] - 2117576
Evidence of a dynamically evolving Galactic warp
Submitted: 2019-12-22, last modified: 2020-06-18
In a cosmological setting, the disc of a galaxy is expected to continuously
experience gravitational torques and perturbations from a variety of sources,
which can cause the disc to wobble, flare and warp. Specifically, the study of
galactic warps and their dynamical nature can potentially reveal key
information on the formation history of galaxies and the mass distribution of
their halos. Our Milky Way presents a unique case study for galactic warps,
thanks to the detailed knowledge of its stellar distribution and kinematics.
Using a simple model of how the warp's orientation is changing with time, we
here measure the precession rate of the Milky Way's warp using 12 million giant
stars from Gaia Data Release 2, finding that it is precessing at $10.86 \pm
0.03_{stat} \pm 3.20_{sys}$ km/s/kpc in the direction of Galactic rotation,
about one third the angular velocity at the Sun's position in the Galaxy. The
direction and magnitude of the warp's precession rate favour the scenario that
the warp is the results of a recent or ongoing encounter with a satellite
galaxy, rather than the relic of the ancient assembly history of the Galaxy.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.10196 [pdf] - 1754962
A dynamically young and perturbed Milky Way disk
Antoja, T.;
Helmi, A.;
Romero-Gomez, M.;
Katz, D.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Drimmel, R.;
Evans, D. W.;
Figueras, F.;
Poggio, E.;
Reyle, C.;
Robin, A. C.;
Seabroke, G.;
Soubiran, C.
Submitted: 2018-04-26, last modified: 2018-09-24
The evolution of the Milky Way disk, which contains most of the stars in the
Galaxy, is affected by several phenomena. For example, the bar and the spiral
arms of the Milky Way induce radial migration of stars and can trap or scatter
stars close to orbital resonances. External perturbations from satellite
galaxies can also have a role, causing dynamical heating of the Galaxy,
ring-like structures in the disk and correlations between different components
of the stellar velocity. These perturbations can also cause 'phase wrapping'
signatures in the disk, such as arched velocity structures in the motions of
stars in the Galactic plane. Some manifestations of these dynamical processes
have already been detected, including kinematic substructure in samples of
nearby stars, density asymmetries and velocities across the Galactic disk that
differ from the axisymmetric and equilibrium expectations, especially in the
vertical direction, and signatures of incomplete phase mixing in the disk. Here
we report an analysis of the motions of six million stars in the Milky Way
disk. We show that the phase-space distribution contains different
substructures with various morphologies, such as snail shells and ridges, when
spatial and velocity coordinates are combined. We infer that the disk must have
been perturbed between 300 million and 900 million years ago, consistent with
estimates of the previous pericentric passage of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy.
Our findings show that the Galactic disk is dynamically young and that
modelling it as time-independent and axisymmetric is incorrect.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.03171 [pdf] - 1736378
The Galactic warp revealed by Gaia DR2 kinematics
Poggio, E.;
Drimmel, R.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Andrae, R.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Antoja, T.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Evans, D. W.;
Figueras, F.;
Katz, D.;
Reylé, C.;
Robin, A. C.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.
Submitted: 2018-05-08, last modified: 2018-08-13
Using Gaia DR2 astrometry, we map the kinematic signature of the Galactic
stellar warp out to a distance of 7 kpc from the Sun. Combining Gaia DR2 and
2MASS photometry, we identify, via a probabilistic approach, 599 494 upper main
sequence stars and 12 616 068 giants without the need for individual extinction
estimates. The spatial distribution of the upper main sequence stars clearly
shows segments of the nearest spiral arms. The large-scale kinematics of both
the upper main sequence and giant populations show a clear signature of the
warp of the Milky Way, apparent as a gradient of 5-6 km/s in the vertical
velocities from 8 to 14 kpc in Galactic radius. The presence of the signal in
both samples, which have different typical ages, suggests that the warp is a
gravitationally induced phenomenon.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09380 [pdf] - 1732654
Gaia Data Release 2: Mapping the Milky Way disc kinematics
Gaia Collaboration;
Katz, D.;
Antoja, T.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Reylé, C.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Soubiran, C.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Poggio, E.;
Robin, A. C.;
Evans, D. W.;
co-authors, 440 DPAC
Submitted: 2018-04-25
To illustrate the potential of GDR2, we provide a first look at the
kinematics of the Milky Way disc, within a radius of several kiloparsecs around
the Sun. We benefit for the first time from a sample of 6.4 million F-G-K stars
with full 6D phase-space coordinates, precise parallaxes, and precise Galactic
cylindrical velocities . From this sample, we extracted a sub-sample of 3.2
million giant stars to map the velocity field of the Galactic disc from
$\sim$5~kpc to $\sim$13~kpc from the Galactic centre and up to 2~kpc above and
below the plane. We also study the distribution of 0.3 million solar
neighbourhood stars ($r < 200$~pc), with median velocity uncertainties of
0.4~km/s, in velocity space and use the full sample to examine how the
over-densities evolve in more distant regions. GDR2 allows us to draw 3D maps
of the Galactocentric median velocities and velocity dispersions with
unprecedented accuracy, precision, and spatial resolution. The maps show the
complexity and richness of the velocity field of the galactic disc. We observe
streaming motions in all the components of the velocities as well as patterns
in the velocity dispersions. For example, we confirm the previously reported
negative and positive galactocentric radial velocity gradients in the inner and
outer disc, respectively. Here, we see them as part of a non-axisymmetric
kinematic oscillation, and we map its azimuthal and vertical behaviour. We also
witness a new global arrangement of stars in the velocity plane of the solar
neighbourhood and in distant regions in which stars are organised in thin
substructures with the shape of circular arches that are oriented approximately
along the horizontal direction in the $U-V$ plane. Moreover, in distant
regions, we see variations in the velocity substructures more clearly than ever
before, in particular, variations in the velocity of the Hercules stream.
(abridged)
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.05226 [pdf] - 1697907
Search for Galactic warp signal in Gaia DR1 proper motions
Submitted: 2017-07-17
The nature and origin of the Galactic warp represent one of the open
questions posed by Galactic evolution. Thanks to Gaia high precision absolute
astrometry, steps towards the understanding of the warp's dynamical nature can
be made. Indeed, proper motions for long-lived stable warp are expected to show
measurable trends in the component vertical to the galactic plane. Within this
context, we search for the kinematic warp signal in the first Gaia data release
(DR1). By analyzing distant spectroscopically-identified OB stars in the
Hipparcos subset in Gaia DR1, we find that the kinematic trends cannot be
explained by a simple model of a long-lived warp. We therefore discuss possible
scenarios for the interpretation of the obtained results. We also present
current work in progress to select a larger sample of OB star candidates from
the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS) subsample in DR1, and delineate the
points that we will be addressing in the near future.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.04391 [pdf] - 1584663
Evidence for orbital motion of CW Leonis from ground-based astrometry
Submitted: 2017-06-14
Recent ALMA observations indicate that CW Leo, the closest carbon-rich AGB
star to the Sun, might have a low-mass stellar companion. We present archival
ground-based astrometric measurements of CW Leo obtained within the context of
the Torino Parallax Program and with $>6$ yr ($1995 - 2001$) of time baseline.
The residuals to a single-star solution show significant curvature, and they
are strongly correlated with the well-known $I$-band photometric variations due
to stellar pulsations. We describe successfully the astrometry of CW Leo with a
variability-induced motion (VIM) + acceleration model. We obtain proper motion
and parallax of the center-of-mass of the binary, the former in fair agreement
with recent estimates, the latter at the near end of the range of inferred
distances based on indirect methods. The VIM + acceleration model results allow
us to derive a companion mass in agreement with that inferred by ALMA, they
point towards a somewhat longer period than implied by ALMA, but are not
compatible with much longer period estimates. These data will constitute a
fundamental contribution towards the full understanding of the orbital
architecture of the system when combined with Gaia astrometry, providing a
$\sim 25$\,yr time baseline.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.04556 [pdf] - 1578049
The kinematic signature of the Galactic warp in Gaia DR1 - I. The
Hipparcos subsample
Submitted: 2017-02-15
The mechanism responsible for the warp of our Galaxy, as well as its
dynamical nature, continues to remain unknown. With the advent of high
precision astrometry, new horizons have been opened for detecting the
kinematics associated with the warp and constraining possible warp formation
scenarios for the Milky Way. The aim of this contribution is to establish
whether the first Gaia data release (DR1) shows significant evidence of the
kinematic signature expected from a long-lived Galactic warp in the kinematics
of distant OB stars. As the first paper in a series, we present our approach
for analyzing the proper motions and apply it to the sub-sample of Hipparcos
stars. We select a sample of 989 distant spectroscopically-identified OB stars
from the New Reduction of Hipparcos, of which 758 are also in Gaia DR1,
covering distances from 0.5 to 3 kpc from the Sun. We develop a model of the
spatial distribution and kinematics of the OB stars from which we produce the
probability distribution functions of the proper motions, with and without the
systematic motions expected from a long-lived warp. A likelihood analysis is
used to compare the expectations of the models with the observed proper motions
from both Hipparcos and Gaia DR1. We find that the proper motions of the nearby
OB stars are consistent with the signature of a warp, while those of the more
distant stars (parallax<1 mas) are not. The kinematics of our sample of young
OB stars suggests that systematic vertical motions in the disk cannot be
explained by a simple model of a stable long-lived warp. The Galactic warp may
either be a transient feature, or additional phenomena are acting on the
gaseous component of the Milky Way, causing systematic vertical motions that
are masking the expected warp signal. A larger and deeper sample of stars with
Gaia astrometry will be needed to constrain the dynamical nature of the
Galactic warp.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04172 [pdf] - 1480659
Gaia Data Release 1. Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey
properties
Submitted: 2016-09-14
At about 1000 days after the launch of Gaia we present the first Gaia data
release, Gaia DR1, consisting of astrometry and photometry for over 1 billion
sources brighter than magnitude 20.7. We summarize Gaia DR1 and provide
illustrations of the scientific quality of the data, followed by a discussion
of the limitations due to the preliminary nature of this release. Gaia DR1
consists of: a primary astrometric data set which contains the positions,
parallaxes, and mean proper motions for about 2 million of the brightest stars
in common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues and a secondary astrometric
data set containing the positions for an additional 1.1 billion sources. The
second component is the photometric data set,consisting of mean G-band
magnitudes for all sources. The G-band light curves and the characteristics of
~3000 Cepheid and RR Lyrae stars, observed at high cadence around the south
ecliptic pole, form the third component. For the primary astrometric data set
the typical uncertainty is about 0.3 mas for the positions and parallaxes, and
about 1 mas/yr for the proper motions. A systematic component of ~0.3 mas
should be added to the parallax uncertainties. For the subset of ~94000
Hipparcos stars in the primary data set, the proper motions are much more
precise at about 0.06 mas/yr. For the secondary astrometric data set, the
typical uncertainty of the positions is ~10 mas. The median uncertainties on
the mean G-band magnitudes range from the mmag level to ~0.03 mag over the
magnitude range 5 to 20.7. Gaia DR1 represents a major advance in the mapping
of the heavens and the availability of basic stellar data that underpin
observational astrophysics. Nevertheless, the very preliminary nature of this
first Gaia data release does lead to a number of important limitations to the
data quality which should be carefully considered before drawing conclusions
from the data.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04303 [pdf] - 1523840
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million
proper motions and parallaxes
Lindegren, L.;
Lammers, U.;
Bastian, U.;
Hernández, J.;
Klioner, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Bombrun, A.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Abbas, U.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anton, S.;
Bach, N.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Berthier, J.;
Bianchi, L.;
Biermann, M.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Carlucci, T.;
Castañeda, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Clotet, M.;
Crosta, M.;
Davidson, M.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Geyer, R.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hauser, M.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Löffler, W.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Portell, J.;
Riva, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Serraller, I.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R.;
Spagna, A.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Zschocke, S.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Gracia, G.;
Raison, F.;
Lister, T.;
Marchant, J.;
Messineo, R.;
Soffel, M.;
Osorio, J.;
de Torres, A.;
O'Mullane, W.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1
billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by
the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give
a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the
model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in
common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric
single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from
the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by
neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an
analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison
with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down
to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to
Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors
depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond
(mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to
~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is
aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than
0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03
mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the
Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the
nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the
quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what
is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent
a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical
definition of the optical reference frame.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.2157 [pdf] - 1179097
The Gaia astrophysical parameters inference system (Apsis). Pre-launch
description
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Andrae, R.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Carrión, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
de Laverny, P.;
Delchambre, L.;
Drazinos, P.;
Drimmel, R.;
Frémat, Y.;
Fustes, D.;
García-Torres, M.;
Guédé, C.;
Heiter, U.;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Knude, J.;
Kolka, I.;
Kontizas, E.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lindstrøm, H.;
Liu, C.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Manteiga, M.;
Martayan, C.;
Ordenovic, Ch.;
Pichon, B.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Smith, K.;
Sordo, R.;
Soubiran, C.;
Surdej, J.;
Thévenin, F.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Vallenari, A.;
Zorec, J.
Submitted: 2013-09-09
The Gaia satellite will survey the entire celestial sphere down to 20th
magnitude, obtaining astrometry, photometry, and low resolution
spectrophotometry on one billion astronomical sources, plus radial velocities
for over one hundred million stars. Its main objective is to take a census of
the stellar content of our Galaxy, with the goal of revealing its formation and
evolution. Gaia's unique feature is the measurement of parallaxes and proper
motions with hitherto unparalleled accuracy for many objects. As a survey, the
physical properties of most of these objects are unknown. Here we describe the
data analysis system put together by the Gaia consortium to classify these
objects and to infer their astrophysical properties using the satellite's data.
This system covers single stars, (unresolved) binary stars, quasars, and
galaxies, all covering a wide parameter space. Multiple methods are used for
many types of stars, producing multiple results for the end user according to
different models and assumptions. Prior to its application to real Gaia data
the accuracy of these methods cannot be assessed definitively. But as an
example of the current performance, we can attain internal accuracies (RMS
residuals) on F,G,K,M dwarfs and giants at G=15 (V=15-17) for a wide range of
metallicites and interstellar extinctions of around 100K in effective
temperature (Teff), 0.1mag in extinction (A0), 0.2dex in metallicity ([Fe/H]),
and 0.25dex in surface gravity (logg). The accuracy is a strong function of the
parameters themselves, varying by a factor of more than two up or down over
this parameter range. After its launch in November 2013, Gaia will nominally
observe for five years, during which the system we describe will continue to
evolve in light of experience with the real data.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.0132 [pdf] - 1116306
Gaia Universe Model Snapshot : A statistical analysis of the expected
contents of the Gaia catalogue
Robin, A. C.;
Luri, X.;
Reylé, C.;
Isasi, Y.;
Grux, E.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Arenou, F.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Belcheva, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Jordi, C.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Masana, E.;
Mauduit, J. C.;
Mignard, F.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Slezak, E.;
Sozzetti, A.
Submitted: 2012-02-01, last modified: 2012-02-02
Context. This study has been developed in the framework of the computational
simulations executed for the preparation of the ESA Gaia astrometric mission.
Aims. We focus on describing the objects and characteristics that Gaia will
potentially observe without taking into consideration instrumental effects
(detection efficiency, observing errors). Methods. The theoretical Universe
Model prepared for the Gaia simulation has been statistically analyzed at a
given time. Ingredients of the model are described, giving most attention to
the stellar content, the double and multiple stars, and variability. Results.
In this simulation the errors have not been included yet. Hence we estimate the
number of objects and their theoretical photometric, astrometric and
spectroscopic characteristics in the case that they are perfectly detected. We
show that Gaia will be able to potentially observe 1.1 billion of stars (single
or part of multiple star systems) of which about 2% are variable stars, 3% have
one or two exoplanets. At the extragalactic level, observations will be
potentially composed by several millions of galaxies, half million to 1 million
of quasars and about 50,000 supernovas that will occur during the 5 years of
mission. The simulated catalogue will be made publicly available by the DPAC on
the Gaia portal of the ESA web site http://www.rssd.esa.int/gaia/.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.2522 [pdf] - 14559
The Second-Generation Guide Star Catalog: Description and Properties
Lasker, B. M.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
McLean, B. J.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Drimmel, R.;
Garcia, J.;
Greene, G.;
Guglielmetti, F.;
Hanley, C.;
Hawkins, G.;
Laidler, V. G.;
Loomis, C.;
Meakes, M.;
Mignani, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morrison, J.;
Pannunzio, R.;
Rosenberg, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Sturch, C. R.;
Volpicelli, A.;
White, R. L.;
Wolfe, D.;
Zacchei, A.
Submitted: 2008-07-16
The GSC-II is an all-sky database of objects derived from the uncompressed
DSS that the STScI has created from the Palomar and UK Schmidt survey plates
and made available to the community. Like its predecessor (GSC-I), the GSC-II
was primarily created to provide guide star information and observation
planning support for HST. This version, however, is already employed at some of
the ground-based new-technology telescopes such as GEMINI, VLT, and TNG, and
will also be used to provide support for the JWST and Gaia space missions as
well as LAMOST, one of the major ongoing scientific projects in China. Two
catalogs have already been extracted from the GSC-II database and released to
the astronomical community. A magnitude-limited (R=18.0) version, GSC2.2, was
distributed soon after its production in 2001, while the GSC2.3 release has
been available for general access since 2007.
The GSC2.3 catalog described in this paper contains astrometry, photometry,
and classification for 945,592,683 objects down to the magnitude limit of the
plates. Positions are tied to the ICRS; for stellar sources, the all-sky
average absolute error per coordinate ranges from 0.2" to 0.28" depending on
magnitude. When dealing with extended objects, astrometric errors are 20% worse
in the case of galaxies and approximately a factor of 2 worse for blended
images. Stellar photometry is determined to 0.13-0.22 mag as a function of
magnitude and photographic passbands (B,R,I). Outside of the galactic plane,
stellar classification is reliable to at least 90% confidence for magnitudes
brighter than R=19.5, and the catalog is complete to R=20.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.0889 [pdf] - 7801
Gaia: Organisation and challenges for the data processing
Mignard, F.;
Bailer-Jones, C.;
Bastian, U.;
Drimmel, R.;
Eyer, L.;
Katz, D.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Luri, X.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Passot, X.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Prusti, T.
Submitted: 2007-12-06
Gaia is an ambitious space astrometry mission of ESA with a main objective to
map the sky in astrometry and photometry down to a magnitude 20 by the end of
the next decade. While the mission is built and operated by ESA and an
industrial consortium, the data processing is entrusted to a consortium formed
by the scientific community, which was formed in 2006 and formally selected by
ESA one year later. The satellite will downlink around 100 TB of raw telemetry
data over a mission duration of 5 years from which a very complex iterative
processing will lead to the final science output: astrometry with a final
accuracy of a few tens of microarcseconds, epoch photometry in wide and narrow
bands, radial velocity and spectra for the stars brighter than 17 mag. We
discuss the general principles and main difficulties of this very large data
processing and present the organisation of the European Consortium responsible
for its design and implementation.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0611885 [pdf] - 87271
Gaia Data Processing Architecture
O'Mullane, W.;
Lammers, U.;
Bailer-Jones, C.;
Bastian, U.;
Brown, A.;
Drimmel, R.;
Eyer, L.;
Huc, C.;
Jansen, F.;
Katz, D.;
Lindegren, L.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.
Submitted: 2006-11-29
Gaia is ESA's ambitious space astrometry mission the main objective of which
is to astrometrically and spectro-photometrically map 1000 Million celestial
objects (mostly in our galaxy) with unprecedented accuracy. The announcement of
opportunity for the data processing will be issued by ESA late in 2006. The
Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC) has been formed recently
and is preparing an answer. The satellite will downlink close to 100 TB of raw
telemetry data over 5 years. To achieve its required accuracy of a few 10s of
Microarcsecond astrometry, a highly involved processing of this data is
required.
In addition to the main astrometric instrument Gaia will host a Radial
Velocity instrument, two low-resolution dispersers for multi-color photometry
and two Star Mappers. Gaia is a flying Giga Pixel camera. The various
instruments each require relatively complex processing while at the same time
being interdependent. We describe the overall composition of the DPAC and the
envisaged overall architecture of the Gaia data processing system. We shall
delve further into the core processing - one of the nine, so-called,
coordination units comprising the Gaia processing system.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0512038 [pdf] - 78238
The design and performance of the Gaia photometric system
Jordi, C.;
Hoeg, E.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Knude, J.;
Straizys, V.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Claeskens, J. -F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Figueras, F.;
Grenon, M.;
Kolka, I.;
Perryman, M. A. C.;
Tautvaisiene, G.;
Vansevicius, V.;
Willemsen, P. G.;
Bridzius, A.;
Evans, D. W.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fiorucci, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Kaempf, T. A.;
Kazlauskas, A.;
Kucinskas, A.;
Malyuto, V.;
Munari, U.;
Reyle, C.;
Torra, J.;
Vallenari, A.;
Zdanavicius, K.;
Korakitis, R.;
Malkov, O.;
Smette, A.
Submitted: 2005-12-01
The European Gaia astrometry mission is due for launch in 2011. Gaia will
rely on the proven principles of ESA's Hipparcos mission to create an all-sky
survey of about one billion stars throughout our Galaxy and beyond, by
observing all objects down to 20th magnitude. Through its massive measurement
of stellar distances, motions and multi-colour photometry it will provide
fundamental data necessary for unravelling the structure, formation and
evolution of the Galaxy. This paper presents the design and performance of the
broad- and medium-band set of photometric filters adopted as the baseline for
Gaia. The nineteen selected passbands (extending from the ultraviolet to the
far-red), the criteria, and the methodology on which this choice has been based
are discussed in detail. We analyse the photometric capabilities for
characterizing the luminosity, temperature, gravity and chemical composition of
stars. We also discuss the automatic determination of these physical parameters
for the large number of observations involved, for objects located throughout
the entire Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Finally, the capability of the
photometric system to deal with the main Gaia science case is outlined.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0307273 [pdf] - 57986
A three-dimensional Galactic extinction model
Submitted: 2003-07-14, last modified: 2003-07-15
A large-scale three-dimensional model of Galactic extinction is presented
based on the Galactic dust distribution model of Drimmel and Spergel (2001).
The extinction A_V to any point within the Galactic disk can be quickly deduced
using a set of three-dimensional cartesian grids. Extinctions from the model
are compared to empirical extinction measures, including lines-of-sight in and
near the Galactic plane using optical and NIR extinction measures; in
particular we show how extinction can be derived from NIR color-magnitude
diagrams in the Galactic plane to a distance of 8 kiloparsec.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0303527 [pdf] - 55766
The Torino Observatory Parallax Program: White Dwarf Candidates
Smart, R. L.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Massone, G.;
Casalegno, R.;
Chiumiento, G.;
Drimmel, R.;
Lanteri, L.;
Marocco, F.;
Spagna, A.
Submitted: 2003-03-24
We present parallax determinations for six white dwarf candidates in the
Torino Observatory Parallax Program. The absolute parallaxes are found with
precisions at the 2-3 milliarcsecond level. For WD 1126+185 we find a distance
incompatible with being a white dwarf, implying an incorrect classification.
For WD 2216+484 we find our distance is consistent with a simple DA white dwarf
rather than a composite system as previously proposed in the literature. In
general it is found that the published photometric distance is an overestimate
of the distance found here.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0212351 [pdf] - 53741
Galaxy structure and kinematics towards the NGP
Submitted: 2002-12-16
We present a proper motion survey over about 200 square degrees towards the
NGP, based on the material used for the construction of the GSC-II, that we are
using to study the vertical structure and kinematics of the Galaxy. In
particular, we measured the rotation velocity of the halo up to 10 kpc above
the galactic plane traced by a sample of RR Lyr{\ae} and BHB giants for which
radial velocities were used to recover the complete distribution of the spatial
velocities. Finally, the impact of astrometric and spectroscopic GAIA
observation are discussed.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0111244 [pdf] - 1232781
Galactic Structure and Radioactivity Source Distributions
Submitted: 2001-11-13
A probable sky map of the emission from a short-lived isotrope produced by
massive stars is presented. The model is based on the nonaxisymmetric component
of a dust distribution model developed to reproduce Galactic FIR emission.
Features seen in COMPTEL observations are qualitatively reproduced.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0101259 [pdf] - 142525
Three Dimensional Structure of the Milky Way Disk
Submitted: 2001-01-16, last modified: 2001-03-29
We present a three dimensional model for the Milky Way fit to the
far-infrared (FIR) and near-infrared (NIR) data from the COBE/DIRBE instrument
for Galactic latitudes |b| < 30 degrees and to within 20 degrees of the
Galactic center. Because of the low optical depth at 240 microns, the FIR
emission traces the distribution of galactic dust in the Galaxy. We model the
dust distribution as due to three components: a warped exponential disk with
scale length 0.28 R_sun and a flaring scale height, a spiral arm component with
four arms as traced by Galactic HII regions, and the local (Orion) arm which
produces prominent emission features at galactic longitude l approx. 80 and
-100 degrees. A Cosmic Infrared Background of 1.07 MJy/sr is recovered,
consistent with previous determinations. The dust distribution is then used to
calculate absorption in J and K, and the stellar emission in these wavebands is
modeled with two components: a warped exponential disk with a scale length of
0.28 R_sun and a spiral arm component dominated by two arms. This small scale
length is consistent with a maximal disk model for our Galaxy, which is
inconsistent with the cuspy dark matter halos predicted in CDM models. We find
different amplitudes for the warp in the stars and dust, which starts within
the Solar Circle.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0008313 [pdf] - 37629
Distribution of dust and stars in the Galaxy
Submitted: 2000-08-20
Using far-infrared 240 micron and near-infrared K band data from the
COBE/DIRBE instrument, we model the Galactic stellar and dust distribution.
Making the assumption that the Galaxy is transparent in the 240 micron band,
the dust emission is modeled using the following components: a warped
exponential disk of scale length 0.26 R_sun, a spiral arm component as mapped
by HII regions, and a feature coinciding with the local (Orion) arm. The dust
distribution is used to calculate absorption in the K band, and the stellar
emission is likewise modeled with a warped exponential disk, with a scale
length of 0.29 R_sun, and a spiral arm component. Models of the K band emission
in the Galactic plane indicate that in this waveband a two arm spiral dominates
the nonaxisymmetric emission. The warp is evident in both the dust and stellar
component, and is found to start within the Solar Circle.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0005241 [pdf] - 36013
Evidence for a two-armed spiral in the Milky Way
Submitted: 2000-05-11
Emission profiles of the Galactic plane in K and at $240\micron$ are
presented, and features associated with the tangents of the spiral arms are
identified. In the K band, which traces stellar emission and suffers little
from absorbtion, features associated with the arm tangents indicate that a
two-armed logarithmic spiral dominates the nonaxisymmetric structure of the
Milky Way. In contrast, the $240\micron$ emission from dust entrained in the
interstellar gas is consistent with a four-armed model, in concordance with
radio data and optical spiral tracers. This suggests that the non-axisymmetric
mass perturbation responsible for the four-armed spiral structure in the gas
has a two rather than four-armed structure.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9912398 [pdf] - 110061
The Galactic warp in OB stars from Hipparcos
Submitted: 1999-12-18, last modified: 1999-12-22
The kinematics of distant OB stars perpendicular to the Galactic plane,
inferred from proper motions in the Hipparcos catalogue, are analysed and
compared to the kinematic signature that would be induced by a long-lived
Galactic warp. Previously we reported that the kinematics of the OB stars
toward the anticenter were inconsistent with the assumption of a long-lived
warp (Nature 392, 471), showing negative systematic motions as opposed to the
expected positive motions. Using a larger sample of OB stars, improved
distances, and a more accurate model for the uncertainties, we confirm our
previous result for a larger range of galactocentric radii. However, we note
that the new model for errors in the photometric distances reveal an important
bias that causes the observed systematic vertical motions to be smaller than
their true values. Using synthetic catalogues we investigate the effect of this
bias on the systematic vertical motions in conjunction with the possibility of
a smaller warp amplitude and a warp precession rate, both of which can also
lead to smaller systematic motions. Taken together these three effects can work
to produce negative observed systematic vertical motions, similar to those
detected in the data, though only with both excessively high precession rates
(-25 km/sec/kpc) and very large photometric errors (1 magnitude).