Normalized to: Dour, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0105129 [pdf] - 42358
Cosmology from Cosmic Microwave Background and Galaxy Clusters
Submitted: 2001-05-08, last modified: 2001-11-21
We present the results of analysis of constraints on cosmological parameters
from cosmic microwave background (CMB) alone and in combination with galaxy
cluster baryon fraction assuming inflation--generated adiabatic scalar
fluctuations. The CMB constraints are obtained using our likelihood
approximation method (Bartlett et al., 2000, Douspis et al., 2001). In the
present analysis we use the new data coming from MAXIMA and BOOMERanG balloon
borne experiments, the first results of the DASI interferometer together with
the COBE/DMR data. The quality of these independent data sets implies that the
$C_\ell$ are rather well known, and allow reliable constraints. We found that
the constraints in the $\Omega-H_0$ plane are very tightened, favouring a flat
Universe, that the index of the primordial fluctuations is very close to one,
that the primordial baryon density is now in good agreement with primordial
nucleosynthesis. Nevertheless degeneracies between several parameters still
exist, and for instance the constraint on the cosmological constant or the
Hubble constant are very weak, preferred values being low. A way to break these
degeneracies is to ``cross-constrain'' the parameters by combining with
constraints from other independent data. We use the baryon fraction
determination from X-ray clusters of galaxies as an additional constraint and
show that the combined analysis leads to strong constraints on all cosmological
parameters. Using a high baryon fraction ($\sim 15%$ for $h = 0.5$) we found a
rather low Hubble constant, values around 80 km/s/Mpc being ruled out. Using a
recent and low baryon fraction estimation ($\sim 10%$ for $h = 0.5$) we found a
preferred model with a low Hubble constant and a high density content
($\Omega_m$), an Einstein--de Sitter model being only weakly ruled out.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9903045 [pdf] - 363262
An Approximation to the Likelihood Function for Band-Power Estimates of
CMB Anisotropies
Submitted: 1999-03-02, last modified: 2001-04-23
Band-power estimates of cosmic microwave background fluctuations are now
routinely used to place constraints on cosmological parameters. For this to be
done in a rigorous fashion, the full likelihood function of band-power
estimates must be employed. Even for Gaussian theories, this likelihood
function is not itself Gaussian, for the simple reason that band-powers measure
the {\em variance} of the random sky fluctuations. In the context of Gaussian
sky fluctuations, we use an ideal situation to motivate a general form for the
full likelihood function from a given experiment. This form contains only two
free parameters, which can be determined if the 68% and 95% confidence
intervals of the true likelihood function are known. The ansatz works
remarkably well when compared to the complete likelihood function for a number
of experiments. For application of this kind of approach, we suggest that in
the future both 68% and 95% (and perhaps also the 99.7%) confidence intervals
be given when reporting experimental results.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0104366 [pdf] - 42105
Concerning Parameter Estimation Using the Cosmic Microwave Background
Submitted: 2001-04-23
Most parameter constraints obtained from cosmic microwave background (CMB)
anisotropy data are based on power estimates and rely on approximate likelihood
functions; computational difficulties generally preclude an exact analysis
based on pixel values. With the specific goal of testing this kind of approach,
we have performed a complete (un-approximated) likelihood analysis combining
the COBE, Saskatoon and MAX data sets. We examine in detail the ability of
certain approximate techniques based on band-power estimates to recover the
full likelihood constraints. The traditional $\chi^2$-method does not always
find the same best-fit model as the likelihood analysis (a bias), due mainly to
the false assumption of Gaussian likelihoods that makes the method overly
sensitive to data outliers. Although an improvement, other approaches employing
non-Gaussian flat-band likelihoods do not always faithfully reproduce the
complete likelihood constraints either; not even when using the exact flat-band
likelihood curves. We trace this to the neglect of spectral information by
simple flat band-power estimates. A straightforward extension incorporating a
local effective slope (of the power spectrum, $C_l$) provides a faithful
representation of the likelihood surfaces without significantly increasing
computing cost. Finally, we also demonstrate that the best-fit model to this
particular data set is a {\em good fit}, or that the observations are
consistent with Gaussian sky fluctuations, according to our statistic.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0004282 [pdf] - 362879
Cosmological Constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background
Submitted: 2000-04-19, last modified: 2001-04-23
Using an approximate likelihood method adapted to band--power estimates, we
analyze the ensemble of first generation cosmic microwave background anisotropy
experiments to deduce constraints over a six--dimensional parameter space
describing Inflation--generated adiabatic, scalar fluctuations. The basic
preferences of simple Inflation scenarios are consistent with the data set:
flat geometries $(\OmT \equiv 1-\Omk \sim 1)$ and a scale--invariant primeval
spectrum ($n\sim 1$) are favored. Models with significant negative curvature
($\OmT < 0.7$) are eliminated, while constraints on postive curvature are less
stringent. Degeneracies among the parameters prevent independent determinations
of the matter density $\OmM$ and the cosmological constant $\Lambda$, and the
Hubble constant $\Ho$ remains relatively unconstrained. We also find that the
height of the first Doppler peak relative to the amplitude suggested by data at
larger $l$ indicates a high baryon content ($\Omb h^2$), almost independently
of the other parameters. Besides the overall qualitative advance expected of
the next generation experiments, their improved dipole calibrations will be
particularly useful for constraining the peak height. Our analysis includes a
{\em Goodness--of--Fit} statistic applicable to power estimates and which
indicates that the maximum likelihood model provides an acceptable fit to the
data set.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9908037 [pdf] - 107709
A New Local Temperature Distribution Function for X-ray Clusters:
Cosmological Applications
Submitted: 1999-08-04, last modified: 2000-12-26
(abridged) We present a new determination of the local temperature function
of X-ray clusters. We use a new sample comprising fifty clusters for which
temperature information is now available, making it the largest complete sample
of its kind. It is therefore expected to significantly improve the estimation
of the temperature distribution function of moderately hot clusters. We find
that the resulting temperature function is higher than previous estimations,
but agrees well with the temperature distribution function inferred from the
BCS and RASS luminosity function. We have used this sample to constrain the
amplitude of the matter fluctuations on cluster's scale of
$8\sqrt[3]{\Omega_0}^{-1}h^{-1}$Mpc, assuming a mass-temperature relation based
on recent numerical simulations. We find $\sigma_8 = 0.6\pm 0.02$ for an
$\Omega_0 = 1$ model. Our sample provides an ideal reference at $z \sim 0$ to
use in the application of the cosmological test based on the evolution of X-ray
cluster abundance (Oukbir & Blanchard 1992, 1997). Using Henry's sample, we
find that the abundance of clusters at $z = 0.33$ is significantly smaller, by
a factor larger than 2, which shows that the EMSS sample provides strong
evidence for evolution of the cluster abundance. A likelihood analysis leads to
a rather high value of the mean density parameter of the universe: $\Omega
=0.92 \pm 0.22$ (open case) and $\Omega =0.86 \pm 0.25$ (flat case), which is
consistent with a previous, independent estimation based on the full EMSS
sample by Sadat et al.(1998). Some systematic uncertainties which could alter
this result are briefly discussed.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0004283 [pdf] - 35642
CMB Cosmological Parameter Estimation: Methods and Current Results
Submitted: 2000-04-19
The majority of present efforts to constrain cosmological parameters with
cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data employ approximate likelihood
functions, the time consuming nature of a complete analysis being a major
obstacle. We have performed a full (unapproximated) likelihood analysis on
several experiments that allows us to examine the various assumptions made in
these approximate methods and to evaluate their performance. Our results
indicate that care should be taken when using such approaches. With an improved
approximate method, we present some constraints on cosmological parameters
using the entire present CMB data set.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9810316 [pdf] - 103432
Approximating the Likelihood Function of CMB Experiments
Submitted: 1998-10-20
We discuss the problem of constraining cosmological parameters with cosmic
microwave background band--power estimates. Because these latter are variances,
they do not have gaussian distribution functions and, hence, the standard
$\chi^2$--approach is not strictly applicable. A general purpose approximation
to experimental band--power likelihood functions is proposed, which requires
only limited experimental details. Comparison with the full likelihood function
calculated for several experiments shows that the approximation works well.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9810318 [pdf] - 103434
Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from Current CMB Data
Submitted: 1998-10-20
We discuss the constraints one can place on cosmological parameters using
current cosmic microwave background data. A standard $\chi^2$--minimization
over band--power estimates is first presented, followed by a discussion of the
more correct likelihood approach. We propose an approximation to the complete
likelihood function of an arbitrary experiment requiring only limited and
easily found information about the observations. Examination of both open
models -- $(\Omega,h,Q,n)$ -- and flat models ($\Omega+\Omega_\Lambda=1$) --
$(\Omega,\Omega_b,h,Q,n)$ -- leaves one rather robust result: models with small
curvature are favored.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9804158 [pdf] - 101039
Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from Existing CMB Data
Submitted: 1998-04-16
We use current cosmic microwave background data to constrain cosmological
parameters. The results are presented as confidence regions in the
($\Omega$--$H_o$) -- plane for both open and flat geometries, and are based on
a $\chi^2$ minimization to the power spectrum. Although such an approach does
not strictly apply to power spectrum estimates, the results should nonetheless
be indicative. We find that purely open, low--$\Omega$ models are strongly
disfavored, due to the position of the ``Doppler Peak'' at high $l$; flat
models are less strongly constrained. The parameter space explored is the
largest to date, covering $\Omega$, $H_o$, $n$, $Q$ and $\Omega_B h^2$.