Normalized to: Dotti, F.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.08372 [pdf] - 2061750
Linking the formation and fate of exo-Kuiper belts within solar system
analogues
Veras, Dimitri;
Reichert, Katja;
Dotti, Francesco Flammini;
Cai, Maxwell X.;
Mustill, Alexander J.;
Shannon, Andrew;
McDonald, Catriona H.;
Zwart, Simon Portegies;
Kouwenhoven, M. B. N.;
Spurzem, Rainer
Submitted: 2020-02-19
Escalating observations of exo-minor planets and their destroyed remnants
both passing through the solar system and within white dwarf planetary systems
motivate an understanding of the orbital history and fate of exo-Kuiper belts
and planetesimal discs. Here we explore how the structure of a 40-1000 au
annulus of planetesimals orbiting inside of a solar system analogue that is
itself initially embedded within a stellar cluster environment varies as the
star evolves through all of its stellar phases. We attempt this computationally
challenging link in four parts: (1) by performing stellar cluster simulations
lasting 100 Myr, (2) by making assumptions about the subsequent quiescent 11
Gyr main-sequence evolution, (3) by performing simulations throughout the giant
branch phases of evolution, and (4) by making assumptions about the belt's
evolution during the white dwarf phase. Throughout these stages, we estimate
the planetesimals' gravitational responses to analogues of the four solar
system giant planets, as well as to collisional grinding, Galactic tides,
stellar flybys, and stellar radiation. We find that the imprint of stellar
cluster dynamics on the architecture of $\gtrsim 100$ km-sized exo-Kuiper belt
planetesimals is retained throughout all phases of stellar evolution unless
violent gravitational instabilities are triggered either (1) amongst the giant
planets, or (2) due to a close ($\ll 10^3$ au) stellar flyby. In the absence of
these instabilities, these minor planets simply double their semimajor axis
while retaining their primordial post-cluster eccentricity and inclination
distributions, with implications for the free-floating planetesimal population
and metal-polluted white dwarfs.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.07747 [pdf] - 1948854
Planetary systems in a star cluster I: the Solar system scenario
Submitted: 2019-08-21
Young stars are mostly found in dense stellar environments, and even our own
Solar system may have formed in a star cluster. Here, we numerically explore
the evolution of planetary systems similar to our own Solar system in star
clusters. We investigate the evolution of planetary systems in star clusters.
Most stellar encounters are tidal, hyperbolic, and adiabatic. A small fraction
of the planetary systems escape from the star cluster within 50 Myr; those with
low escape speeds often remain intact during and after the escape process.
While most planetary systems inside the star cluster remain intact, a subset is
strongly perturbed during the first 50 Myr. Over the course of time, 0.3 % -
5.3 % of the planets escape, sometimes up to tens of millions of years after a
stellar encounter occurred. Survival rates are highest for Jupiter, while
Uranus and Neptune have the highest escape rates. Unless directly affected by a
stellar encounter itself, Jupiter frequently serves as a barrier that protects
the terrestrial planets from perturbations in the outer planetary system. In
low-density environments, Jupiter provides protection from perturbations in the
outer planetary system, while in high-density environments, direct
perturbations of Jupiter by neighbouring stars is disruptive to habitable-zone
planets. The diversity amongst planetary systems that is present in the star
clusters at 50 Myr, and amongst the escaping planetary systems, is high, which
contributes to explaining the high diversity of observed exoplanet systems in
star clusters and in the Galactic field
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.07814 [pdf] - 1826876
SPHERE dynamical and spectroscopic characterization of HD142527B
Claudi, R.;
Maire, A. -L.;
Mesa, D.;
Cheetham, A.;
Fontanive, C.;
Gratton, R.;
Zurlo, A.;
Avenhaus, H.;
Bhowmik, T.;
Biller, B.;
Boccaletti, A.;
Bonavita, M.;
Bonnefoy, M.;
Cascone, E.;
Chauvin, G.;
Delboulbè, A.;
Desidera, S.;
D'Orazi, V.;
Feautrier, P.;
Feldt, M.;
Dotti, F. Flammini;
Girard, J. H.;
Giro, E.;
Janson, M.;
Hagelberg, J.;
Keppler, M.;
Kopytova, T.;
Lacour, S.;
Lagrange, A. -M.;
Langlois, M.;
Lannier, J.;
Coroller, H. Le;
Menard, F.;
Messina, S.;
Meyer, M.;
Millward, M.;
Olofsson, J.;
Pavlov, A.;
Peretti, S.;
Perrot, C.;
Pinte, C.;
Pragt, J.;
Ramos, J.;
Rochat, S.;
Rodet, L.;
Roelfsema, R.;
Rouan, D.;
Salter, G.;
Schmidt, T.;
Sissa, E.;
Thebault, P.;
Udry, S.;
Vigan, A.
Submitted: 2018-12-19
We detect the accreting low-mass companion HD142527B at a separation of 73
mas (11.4 au) from the star. No other companions with mass greater than 10 MJ
are visible in the field of view of IFS (\sim 100 au centered on the star) or
in the IRDIS field of view (\sim 400 au centered on the star). Measurements
from IFS, SAM IFS, and IRDIS suggest an M6 spectral type for HD142527B, with an
uncertainty of one spectral subtype, compatible with an object of M=0.11 \pm
0.06 MSun and R=0.15 \pm 0.07 RSun. The determination of the mass remains a
challenge using contemporary evolutionary models, as they do not account for
the energy input due to accretion from infalling material. We consider that the
spectral type of the secondary may also be earlier than the type we derived
from IFS spectra. From dynamical considerations, we further constrain the mass
to 0.26^{+0.16}_{-0.14} MSun , which is consistent with both our spectroscopic
analysis and the values reported in the literature. Following previous methods,
the lower and upper dynamical mass values correspond to a spectral type between
M2.5 and M5.5 for the companion. By fitting the astrometric points, we find the
following orbital parameters: a period of P=35-137 yr; an inclination of
i=121-130 deg.; , a value of Omega=124-135 deg for the longitude of node, and
an 68% confidence interval of \sim 18 - 57 au for the separation at periapsis.
Eccentricity and time at periapsis passage exhibit two groups of values:
\sim0.2-0.45 and \sim0.45-0.7 for e, and \sim 2015-2020 and \sim2020-2022 for
T_0. While these orbital parameters might at first suggest that HD142527B is
not the companion responsible for the outer disk truncation, a previous
hydrodynamical analysis of this system showed that they are compatible with a
companion that is able to produce the large cavity and other observed features.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.12660 [pdf] - 1791836
Planetary Systems in Star Clusters: the dynamical evolution and survival
Submitted: 2018-11-30
Most stars, perhaps even all stars, form in crowded stellar environments.
Such star forming regions typically dissolve within ten million years, while
others remain bound as stellar groupings for hundreds of millions to billions
of years, and then become the open clusters or globular clusters that are
present in our Milky Way galaxy today. A large fraction of stars in the Galaxy
hosts planetary companions. To understand the origin and dynamical evolution of
such exoplanet systems, it is necessary to carefully study the effect of their
environments. Here, we combine theoretical estimates with state-of-the-art
numerical simulations of evolving planetary systems similar to our own solar
system in different star cluster environments. We combine the REBOUND planetary
system evolution code, and the NBODY6++GPU star cluster evolution code,
integrated in the AMUSE multi-physics environment. With our study we can
constrain the effect of external perturbations of different environments on the
planets and debris structures of a wide variety of planetary systems, which may
play a key role for the habitability of exoplanets in the Universe.