Normalized to: Donlon, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.08331 [pdf] - 2017302
Astrometric Errors Introduced by Interpixel Capacitive Coupling in
Hybridized Arrays
Submitted: 2019-12-17
Interpixel capacitance (IPC) between adjacent pixels in hybridized arrays
gives rise to an electrostatic cross talk. This cross talk causes MTF
degradation and blurring of images or spectra collected using these devices. As
pixel size is driven down from the 18 micron pixel pitch of the H2RG read out
circuits to the 10 or 15 micron H4RGs IPC is driven up resulting in greater
cross talk, all else being equal. Mounting evidence indicates that IPC varies
as a function of depletion state of the photo-active diodes. For single pixel
events, increasing the event intensity corresponds to a decreasing fractional
coupling. If left uncorrected, IPC can give rise to systematic errors in
precision astrometric and photometric measurements, in particular when dealing
with confused point sources or spatially extended structures for shape
measurements as demonstrated through comparison of registered sources from ESO
HAWK-I and HST ACS WFC datasets. Furthermore these errors will be the most
significant when operating near the sensitivity limit of these devices.
Deconvolution based correction methods are invalidated by this same signal
dependence. Instead a numerical method of successive approximation can be used
to correct coupling due to a well characterized IPC. Examination of single
pixel reset data above flat fields could be used to characterize IPC's
functional relationship for neighboring pixels. This higher quality
characterization can result in more accurate correction.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.12248 [pdf] - 1969112
Direct measurement of the Kepler Space Telescope CCD's intra-pixel
response function
Submitted: 2019-09-26
Space missions designed for high precision photometric monitoring of stars
often under-sample the point-spread function, with much of the light landing
within a single pixel. Missions like MOST, Kepler, BRITE, and TESS, do this to
avoid uncertainties due to pixel-to-pixel response nonuniformity. This approach
has worked remarkably well. However, individual pixels also exhibit response
nonuniformity. Typically, pixels are most sensitive near their centers and less
sensitive near the edges, with a difference in response of as much as 50%. The
exact shape of this fall-off, and its dependence on the wavelength of light, is
the intra-pixel response function (IPRF). A direct measurement of the IPRF can
be used to improve the photometric uncertainties, leading to improved
photometry and astrometry of under-sampled systems. Using the spot-scan
technique, we measured the IPRF of a flight spare e2v CCD90 imaging sensor,
which is used in the Kepler focal plane. Our spot scanner generates spots with
a full-width at half-maximum of $\lesssim$3 microns across the range of 400 nm
- 850 nm. We find that Kepler's CCD shows similar IPRF behavior to other
back-illuminated devices, with a decrease in responsivity near the edges of a
pixel by $\sim$50%. The IPRF also depends on wavelength, exhibiting a large
amount of diffusion at shorter wavelengths and becoming much more defined by
the gate structure in the near-IR. This method can also be used to measure the
IPRF of the CCDs used for TESS, which borrows much from the Kepler mission.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.09413 [pdf] - 2017176
Point-spread function ramifications and deconvolution of a signal
dependent blur kernel due to interpixel capacitive coupling
Submitted: 2018-05-23
Interpixel capacitance (IPC) is a deterministic electronic coupling that
results in a portion of the collected signal incident on one pixel of a
hybridized detector array being measured in adjacent pixels. Data collected by
light sensitive HgCdTe arrays which exhibit this coupling typically goes
uncorrected or is corrected by treating the coupling as a fixed point spread
function. Evidence suggests that this IPC coupling is not uniform across
different signal and background levels. This variation invalidates assumptions
that are key in decoupling techniques such as Wiener Filtering or application
of the Lucy- Richardson algorithm. Additionally, the variable IPC results in
the point spread function (PSF) depending upon a star's signal level relative
to the background level, amond other parameters. With an IPC ranging from 0.68%
to 1.45% over the full well depth of a sensor, as is a reasonable range for the
H2RG arrays, the FWHM of the JWSTs NIRCam 405N band is degraded from 2.080 pix
(0".132) as expected from the diffraction patter to 2.186 pix (0".142) when the
star is just breaching the sensitivity limit of the system. For example, when
attempting to use a fixed PSF fitting (e.g. assuming the PSF observed from a
bright star in the field) to untangle two sources with a flux ratio of 4:1 and
a center to center distance of 3 pixels, flux estimation can be off by upwards
of 1.5% with a separation error of 50 millipixels. To deal with this issue an
iterative non-stationary method for deconvolution is here proposed,
implemented, and evaluated that can account for the signal dependent nature of
IPC.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.07062 [pdf] - 1557850
Modeling of Hybridized IR Arrays for Characterization of Interpixel
Capacitive Coupling
Submitted: 2017-01-24
Inter pixel capacitance (IPC) is a deterministic electronic coupling
resulting in a portion of signal incident on one pixel of a hybridized detector
array being measured in adjacent pixels. Data collected by light sensitive
HgCdTe arrays which exhibit this coupling typically goes uncorrected or is
corrected by treating the coupling as a fixed point spread function. Evidence
suggests that this coupling is not uniform across signal and background levels.
Sub-arrays of pixels using design parameters based upon HgCdTe indium
hybridized arrays akin to those contained in the James Webb Space Telescope's
NIRcam have been modeled from first principles using Lumerical DEVICE software.
This software simultaneously solves Poisson's Equation and the Drift Diffusion
Equations yielding charge distributions and electric fields. Modeling of this
sort generates the local point spread function across a range of detector
parameters. This results in predictive characterization of IPC across scene and
device parameters that would permit proper photometric correction and signal
restoration to the data. Additionally, the ability to visualize potential
distributions and couplings as generated by the models yields insight that can
be used to minimize IPC coupling in the design of future detectors.