Normalized to: Doelman, N.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.03128 [pdf] - 2118180
The minimum of the time-delay wavefront error in Adaptive Optics
Submitted: 2019-06-07, last modified: 2020-06-19
An analytical expression is given for the minimum of the time-delay induced
wavefront error (also known as the servo-lag error) in Adaptive Optics systems
under temporal prediction filtering. The analysis is based on the von
K\'arm\'an model for the spectral density of refractive index fluctuations and
the hypothesis of frozen flow. An optimal, temporal predictor can achieve up to
a factor 1.77 more reduction of the wavefront phase variance compared to the
zero-order prediction strategy, which is commonly used in Adaptive Optics
systems. Alternatively, an optimal predictor can allow for a 1.41 times longer
time-delay to arrive at the same residual phase variance. Generally, the
performance of the optimal, temporal predictor depends on the very product of
time-delay, wind speed and the reciprocal of turbulence outer scale.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.10225 [pdf] - 2081072
Robustness of prediction for extreme adaptive optics systems under
various observing conditions: An analysis using VLT/SPHERE adaptive optics
data
Submitted: 2020-03-23
For high-contrast imaging (HCI) systems, such as VLT/SPHERE, the performance
of the system at small angular separations is contaminated by the wind-driven
halo in the science image. This halo is a result of the servo-lag error in the
adaptive optics (AO) system due to the finite time between measuring the
wavefront phase and applying the phase correction. One approach to mitigating
the servo-lag error is predictive control. We aim to estimate and understand
the potential on-sky performance that linear data-driven prediction would
provide for VLT/SPHERE under various turbulence conditions. We used a linear
minimum mean square error predictor and applied it to 27 different AO telemetry
data sets from VLT/SPHERE taken over many nights under various turbulence
conditions. We evaluated the performance of the predictor using residual
wavefront phase variance as a performance metric. We show that prediction
always results in a reduction in the temporal wavefront phase variance compared
to the current VLT/SPHERE AO performance. We find an average improvement factor
of 5.1 in phase variance for prediction compared to the VLT/SPHERE residuals.
When comparing to an idealised VLT/SPHERE, we find an improvement factor of
2.0. Under our 27 different cases, we find the predictor results in a smaller
spread of the residual temporal phase variance. Finally, we show there is no
benefit to including spatial information in the predictor in contrast to what
might have been expected from the frozen flow hypothesis. A purely temporal
predictor is best suited for AO on VLT/SPHERE.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.06541 [pdf] - 1862334
Impact of time-variant turbulence behavior on prediction for adaptive
optics systems
Submitted: 2019-03-15, last modified: 2019-04-05
For high contrast imaging systems, the time delay is one of the major
limiting factors for the performance of the extreme adaptive optics (AO)
sub-system and, in turn, the final contrast. The time delay is due to the
finite time needed to measure the incoming disturbance and then apply the
correction. By predicting the behavior of the atmospheric disturbance over the
time delay we can in principle achieve a better AO performance. Atmospheric
turbulence parameters which determine the wavefront phase fluctuations have
time-varying behavior. We present a stochastic model for wind speed and model
time-variant atmospheric turbulence effects using varying wind speed. We test a
low-order, data-driven predictor, the linear minimum mean square error
predictor, for a near-infrared AO system under varying conditions. Our results
show varying wind can have a significant impact on the performance of wavefront
prediction, preventing it from reaching optimal performance. The impact depends
on the strength of the wind fluctuations with the greatest loss in expected
performance being for high wind speeds.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.5846 [pdf] - 1215827
Focal-plane wavefront sensing with high-order adaptive optics systems
Submitted: 2014-07-22, last modified: 2014-09-12
We investigate methods to calibrate the non-common path aberrations at an
adaptive optics system having a wavefront-correcting device working at an
extremely high resolution (larger than 150x150). We use focal-plane images
collected successively, the corresponding phase-diversity information and
numerically efficient algorithms to calculate the required wavefront updates.
The wavefront correction is applied iteratively until the algorithms converge.
Different approaches are studied. In addition of the standard Gerchberg-Saxton
algorithm, we test the extension of the Fast & Furious algorithm that uses
three images and creates an estimate of the pupil amplitudes. We also test
recently proposed phase-retrieval methods based on convex optimisation. The
results indicate that in the framework we consider, the calibration task is
easiest with algorithms similar to the Fast & Furious.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.1006 [pdf] - 1209939
Fast & Furious focal-plane wavefront sensing
Submitted: 2014-06-04
We present two complementary algorithms suitable for using focal-plane
measurements to control a wavefront corrector with an extremely high spatial
resolution. The algorithms use linear approximations to iteratively minimize
the aberrations seen by the focal-plane camera. The first algorithm, Fast &
Furious (FF), uses a weak-aberration assumption and pupil symmetries to achieve
fast wavefront reconstruction. The second algorithm, an extension to FF, can
deal with an arbitrary pupil shape; it uses a Gerchberg-Saxton style error
reduction to determine the pupil amplitudes. Simulations and experimental
results are shown for a spatial light modulator controlling the wavefront with
a resolution of 170 x 170 pixels. The algorithms increase the Strehl ratio from
~0.75 to 0.98-0.99, and the intensity of the scattered light is reduced
throughout the whole recorded image of 320 x 320 pixels. The remaining
wavefront rms error is estimated to be ~0.15 rad with FF and ~0.10 rad with
FF-GS.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.1241 [pdf] - 1179721
Calibrating a high-resolution wavefront corrector with a static
focal-plane camera
Submitted: 2013-10-03
We present a method to calibrate a high-resolution wavefront-correcting
device with a single, static camera, located in the focal plane; no moving of
any component is needed. The method is based on a localized diversity and
differential optical transfer functions (dOTF) to compute both the phase and
amplitude in the pupil plane located upstream of the last imaging optics. An
experiment with a spatial light modulator shows that the calibration is
sufficient to robustly operate a focal-plane wavefront sensing algorithm
controlling a wavefront corrector with ~40 000 degrees of freedom. We estimate
that the locations of identical wavefront corrector elements are determined
with a spatial resolution of 0.3% compared to the pupil diameter.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.3273 [pdf] - 1521908
Extremely fast focal-plane wavefront sensing for extreme adaptive optics
Submitted: 2012-07-13
We present a promising approach to the extremely fast sensing and correction
of small wavefront errors in adaptive optics systems. As our algorithm's
computational complexity is roughly proportional to the number of actuators, it
is particularly suitable to systems with 10,000 to 100,000 actuators. Our
approach is based on sequential phase diversity and simple relations between
the point-spread function and the wavefront error in the case of small
aberrations. The particular choice of phase diversity, introduced by the
deformable mirror itself, minimizes the wavefront error as well as the
computational complexity. The method is well suited for high-contrast
astronomical imaging of point sources such as the direct detection and
characterization of exoplanets around stars, and it works even in the presence
of a coronagraph that suppresses the diffraction pattern. The accompanying
paper in these proceedings by Korkiakoski et al. describes the performance of
the algorithm using numerical simulations and laboratory tests.