Dodgson, Marina
Normalized to: Dodgson, M.
3 article(s) in total. 1 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 2,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605102 [pdf] - 1233784
Deceleration without dark matter
Submitted: 2006-05-03
In homogeneous isotropic cosmological models the angular size theta of a
standard measuring rod changes with redshift z in a manner that depends upon
the parameters of the model. It has been argued that as a population
ultracompact (milliarcsecond) radio sources measured by very long-baseline
interferometry (VLBI) do not evolve with cosmic epoch, and thus comprise a set
of standard objects, at least in a statistical sense. Here we examine the
angular-size/redshift relation for 256 ultracompact sources with z in the range
0.5 to 3.8 for cosmological models with two degrees of freedom (Omega_0 and
Lambda_0). The canonical inflationary cold dark matter model(Omega_0=1,
Lambda_0=0) appears to be ruled out by the observed relationship, whereas
low-density models with a cosmological constant of either sign are favoured.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0109379 [pdf] - 44878
Decelerating universes older than their Hubble times
Submitted: 2001-09-21
Recent observations suggest that Hubble's constant is large, and hence that
the Universe appears to be younger than some of its constituents. The
traditional escape route, which assumes that the expansion is accelerating,
appears to be blocked by observations of Type 1a supernovae, which suggest(ed)
that the Universe is decelerating. These observations are reconciled in a model
in which the Universe has experienced an inflationary phase in the recent past,
driven by an ultra-light inflaton whose Compton wavelength is of the same order
as the Hubble radius.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0109321 [pdf] - 44820
Determination of cosmology and evolution from K-band magnitude-redshift
and number count observations
Submitted: 2001-09-19
We determine cosmological and evolutionary parameters from the 3CR K-band
Hubble diagram and K-band number counts, assuming that the galaxies in question
undergo pure luminosity evolution. Separately the two data sets are highly
degenerate with respect to choice of cosmological and evolutionary parameters,
but in combination the degeneracy is resolved. Of models which are either flat
or have $\Omega_\Lambda=0$, the preferred ones are close to the canonical case
$\Omega_\CdM=1$, $\Omega_\Lambda=0$, with luminosity evolution amounting to one
magnitude brighter at z=1.