Normalized to: Dickman, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.06768 [pdf] - 1259060
Extremely-bright submillimeter galaxies beyond the Lupus-I star-forming
region
Tamura, Y.;
Kawabe, R.;
Shimajiri, Y.;
Tsukagoshi, T.;
Nakajima, Y.;
Oasa, Y.;
Wilner, D. J.;
Chandler, C. J.;
Saigo, K.;
Tomida, K.;
Yun, M. S.;
Taniguchi, A.;
Kohno, K.;
Hatsukade, B.;
Aretxaga, I.;
Austermann, J. E.;
Dickman, R.;
Ezawa, H.;
Goss, W. M.;
Hayashi, M.;
Hughes, D. H.;
Hiramatsu, M.;
Inutsuka, S.;
Ogasawara, R.;
Ohashi, N.;
Oshima, T.;
Scott, K. S.;
Wilson, G. W.
Submitted: 2015-06-22
We report detections of two candidate distant submillimeter galaxies (SMGs),
MM J154506.4$-$344318 and MM J154132.7$-$350320, which are discovered in the
AzTEC/ASTE 1.1 mm survey toward the Lupus-I star-forming region. The two
objects have 1.1 mm flux densities of 43.9 and 27.1 mJy, and have
Herschel/SPIRE counterparts as well. The Submillimeter Array counterpart to the
former SMG is identified at 890 $\mu$m and 1.3 mm. Photometric redshift
estimates using all available data from the mid-infrared to the radio suggest
that the redshifts of the two SMGs are $z_{\rm photo} \simeq$ 4-5 and 3,
respectively. Near-infrared objects are found very close to the SMGs and they
are consistent with low-$z$ ellipticals, suggesting that the high apparent
luminosities can be attributed to gravitational magnification. The cumulative
number counts at $S_{\rm 1.1mm} \ge 25$ mJy, combined with other two 1.1-mm
brightest sources, are $0.70 ^{+0.56}_{-0.34}$ deg$^{-2}$, which is consistent
with a model prediction that accounts for flux magnification due to strong
gravitational lensing. Unexpectedly, a $z > 3$ SMG and a Galactic dense
starless core (e.g., a first hydrostatic core) could be similar in the
mid-infrared to millimeter spectral energy distributions and spatial structures
at least at $\gtrsim 1"$. This indicates that it is necessary to distinguish
the two possibilities by means of broad band photometry from the optical to
centimeter and spectroscopy to determine the redshift, when a compact object is
identified toward Galactic star-forming regions.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.0716 [pdf] - 1263838
Radio Astronomy in LSST Era
Lazio, T. Joseph W.;
Kimball, A.;
Barger, A. J.;
Brandt, W. N.;
Chatterjee, S.;
Clarke, T. E.;
Condon, J. J.;
Dickman, Robert L.;
Hunyh, M. T.;
Jarvis, Matt J.;
Juric, Mario;
Kassim, N. E.;
Myers, S. T.;
Nissanke, Samaya;
Osten, Rachel;
Zauderer, B. A.
Submitted: 2014-01-03
A community meeting on the topic of "Radio Astronomy in the LSST Era" was
hosted by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Charlottesville, VA (2013
May 6--8). The focus of the workshop was on time domain radio astronomy and sky
surveys. For the time domain, the extent to which radio and visible wavelength
observations are required to understand several classes of transients was
stressed, but there are also classes of radio transients for which no visible
wavelength counterpart is yet known, providing an opportunity for discovery.
From the LSST perspective, the LSST is expected to generate as many as 1
million alerts nightly, which will require even more selective specification
and identification of the classes and characteristics of transients that can
warrant follow up, at radio or any wavelength. The LSST will also conduct a
deep survey of the sky, producing a catalog expected to contain over 38 billion
objects in it. Deep radio wavelength sky surveys will also be conducted on a
comparable time scale, and radio and visible wavelength observations are part
of the multi-wavelength approach needed to classify and understand these
objects. Radio wavelengths are valuable because they are unaffected by dust
obscuration and, for galaxies, contain contributions both from star formation
and from active galactic nuclei. The workshop touched on several other topics,
on which there was consensus including the placement of other LSST "Deep
Drilling Fields," inter-operability of software tools, and the challenge of
filtering and exploiting the LSST data stream. There were also topics for which
there was insufficient time for full discussion or for which no consensus was
reached, which included the procedures for following up on LSST observations
and the nature for future support of researchers desiring to use LSST data
products.