Normalized to: Desai, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.16298 [pdf] - 2124987
Measurements of the Time-Dependent Cosmic-Ray Sun Shadow with Seven
Years of IceCube Data -- Comparison with the Solar Cycle and Magnetic Field
Models
Aartsen, M. G.;
Abbasi, R.;
Ackermann, M.;
Adams, J.;
Aguilar, J. A.;
Ahlers, M.;
Ahrens, M.;
Alispach, C.;
Amin, N. M.;
Andeen, K.;
Anderson, T.;
Ansseau, I.;
Anton, G.;
Argüelles, C.;
Auffenberg, J.;
Axani, S.;
Bagherpour, H.;
Bai, X.;
V., A. Balagopal;
Barbano, A.;
Barwick, S. W.;
Bastian, B.;
Basu, V.;
Baum, V.;
Baur, S.;
Bay, R.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Becker, K. -H.;
Tjus, J. Becker;
BenZvi, S.;
Berley, D.;
Bernardini, E.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binder, G.;
Bindig, D.;
Blaufuss, E.;
Blot, S.;
Bohm, C.;
Böser, S.;
Botner, O.;
Böttcher, J.;
Bourbeau, E.;
Bourbeau, J.;
Bradascio, F.;
Braun, J.;
Bron, S.;
Brostean-Kaiser, J.;
Burgman, A.;
Buscher, J.;
Busse, R. S.;
Carver, T.;
Chen, C.;
Cheung, E.;
Chirkin, D.;
Choi, S.;
Clark, B. A.;
Clark, K.;
Classen, L.;
Coleman, A.;
Collin, G. H.;
Conrad, J. M.;
Coppin, P.;
Correa, P.;
Cowen, D. F.;
Cross, R.;
Dave, P.;
De Clercq, C.;
DeLaunay, J. J.;
Dembinski, H.;
Deoskar, K.;
De Ridder, S.;
Desai, A.;
Desiati, P.;
de Vries, K. D.;
de Wasseige, G.;
de With, M.;
DeYoung, T.;
Dharani, S.;
Diaz, A.;
Díaz-Vélez, J. C.;
Dujmovic, H.;
Dunkman, M.;
DuVernois, M. A.;
Dvorak, E.;
Ehrhardt, T.;
Eller, P.;
Engel, R.;
Evenson, P. A.;
Fahey, S.;
Fazely, A. R.;
Felde, J.;
Fichtner, H.;
Fienberg, A. T.;
Filimonov, K.;
Finley, C.;
Fox, D.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Friedman, E.;
Fritz, A.;
Gaisser, T. K.;
Gallagher, J.;
Ganster, E.;
Garrappa, S.;
Gerhardt, L.;
Ghadimi, A.;
Glauch, T.;
Glüsenkamp, T.;
Goldschmidt, A.;
Gonzalez, J. G.;
Goswami, S.;
Grant, D.;
Grégoire, T.;
Griffith, Z.;
Griswold, S.;
Günder, M.;
Gündüz, M.;
Haack, C.;
Hallgren, A.;
Halliday, R.;
Halve, L.;
Halzen, F.;
Hanson, K.;
Hardin, J.;
Haungs, A.;
Hauser, S.;
Hebecker, D.;
Heereman, D.;
Heix, P.;
Helbing, K.;
Hellauer, R.;
Henningsen, F.;
Hickford, S.;
Hignight, J.;
Hill, C.;
Hill, G. C.;
Hoffman, K. D.;
Hoffmann, R.;
Hoinka, T.;
Hokanson-Fasig, B.;
Hoshina, K.;
Huang, F.;
Huber, M.;
Huber, T.;
Hultqvist, K.;
Hünnefeld, M.;
Hussain, R.;
In, S.;
Iovine, N.;
Ishihara, A.;
Jansson, M.;
Japaridze, G. S.;
Jeong, M.;
Jones, B. J. P.;
Jonske, F.;
Joppe, R.;
Kang, D.;
Kang, W.;
Kappes, A.;
Kappesser, D.;
Karg, T.;
Karl, M.;
Karle, A.;
Katz, U.;
Kauer, M.;
Kellermann, M.;
Kelley, J. L.;
Kheirandish, A.;
Kim, J.;
Kin, K.;
Kintscher, T.;
Kiryluk, J.;
Kittler, T.;
Kleimann, J.;
Klein, S. R.;
Koirala, R.;
Kolanoski, H.;
Köpke, L.;
Kopper, C.;
Kopper, S.;
Koskinen, D. J.;
Koundal, P.;
Kowalski, M.;
Krings, K.;
Krückl, G.;
Kulacz, N.;
Kurahashi, N.;
Kyriacou, A.;
Lanfranchi, J. L.;
Larson, M. J.;
Lauber, F.;
Lazar, J. P.;
Leonard, K.;
Leszczyńska, A.;
Li, Y.;
Liu, Q. R.;
Lohfink, E.;
Mariscal, C. J. Lozano;
Lu, L.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Ludwig, A.;
Lünemann, J.;
Luszczak, W.;
Lyu, Y.;
Ma, W. Y.;
Madsen, J.;
Maggi, G.;
Mahn, K. B. M.;
Makino, Y.;
Mallik, P.;
Mancina, S.;
Mariş, I. C.;
Maruyama, R.;
Mase, K.;
Maunu, R.;
McNally, F.;
Meagher, K.;
Medici, M.;
Medina, A.;
Meier, M.;
Meighen-Berger, S.;
Merz, J.;
Meures, T.;
Micallef, J.;
Mockler, D.;
Momenté, G.;
Montaruli, T.;
Moore, R. W.;
Morse, R.;
Moulai, M.;
Muth, P.;
Nagai, R.;
Naumann, U.;
Neer, G.;
Nguyen, L. V.;
Niederhausen, H.;
Nisa, M. U.;
Nowicki, S. C.;
Nygren, D. R.;
Pollmann, A. Obertacke;
Oehler, M.;
Olivas, A.;
O'Murchadha, A.;
O'Sullivan, E.;
Pandya, H.;
Pankova, D. V.;
Park, N.;
Parker, G. K.;
Paudel, E. N.;
Peiffer, P.;
Heros, C. Pérez de los;
Philippen, S.;
Pieloth, D.;
Pieper, S.;
Pinat, E.;
Pizzuto, A.;
Plum, M.;
Popovych, Y.;
Porcelli, A.;
Rodriguez, M. Prado;
Price, P. B.;
Przybylski, G. T.;
Raab, C.;
Raissi, A.;
Rameez, M.;
Rauch, L.;
Rawlins, K.;
Rea, I. C.;
Rehman, A.;
Reimann, R.;
Relethford, B.;
Renschler, M.;
Renzi, G.;
Resconi, E.;
Rhode, W.;
Richman, M.;
Riedel, B.;
Robertson, S.;
Roellinghoff, G.;
Rongen, M.;
Rott, C.;
Ruhe, T.;
Ryckbosch, D.;
Cantu, D. Rysewyk;
Safa, I.;
Herrera, S. E. Sanchez;
Sandrock, A.;
Sandroos, J.;
Santander, M.;
Sarkar, S.;
Sarkar, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Scharf, M.;
Schaufel, M.;
Schieler, H.;
Schlunder, P.;
Schmidt, T.;
Schneider, A.;
Schneider, J.;
Schröder, F. G.;
Schumacher, L.;
Sclafani, S.;
Seckel, D.;
Seunarine, S.;
Shefali, S.;
Silva, M.;
Smithers, B.;
Snihur, R.;
Soedingrekso, J.;
Soldin, D.;
Song, M.;
Spiczak, G. M.;
Spiering, C.;
Stachurska, J.;
Stamatikos, M.;
Stanev, T.;
Stein, R.;
Stettner, J.;
Steuer, A.;
Stezelberger, T.;
Stokstad, R. G.;
Strotjohann, N. L.;
Stürwald, T.;
Stuttard, T.;
Sullivan, G. W.;
Taboada, I.;
Tenholt, F.;
Ter-Antonyan, S.;
Terliuk, A.;
Tilav, S.;
Tollefson, K.;
Tomankova, L.;
Tönnis, C.;
Toscano, S.;
Tosi, D.;
Trettin, A.;
Tselengidou, M.;
Tung, C. F.;
Turcati, A.;
Turcotte, R.;
Turley, C. F.;
Ty, B.;
Unger, E.;
Elorrieta, M. A. Unland;
Usner, M.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Van Driessche, W.;
van Eijk, D.;
van Eijndhoven, N.;
Vannerom, D.;
van Santen, J.;
Verpoest, S.;
Vraeghe, M.;
Walck, C.;
Wallace, A.;
Wallraff, M.;
Watson, T. B.;
Weaver, C.;
Weindl, A.;
Weiss, M. J.;
Weldert, J.;
Wendt, C.;
Werthebach, J.;
Whelan, B. J.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Wiebe, K.;
Wiebusch, C. H.;
Williams, D. R.;
Wills, L.;
Wolf, M.;
Wood, T. R.;
Woschnagg, K.;
Wrede, G.;
Wulff, J.;
Xu, X. W.;
Xu, Y.;
Yanez, J. P.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yuan, T.;
Zhang, Z.;
Zöcklein, M.
Submitted: 2020-06-29
Observations of the time-dependent cosmic-ray Sun shadow have been proven as
a valuable diagnostic for the assessment of solar magnetic field models. In
this paper, seven years of IceCube data are compared to solar activity and
solar magnetic field models. A quantitative comparison of solar magnetic field
models with IceCube data on the event rate level is performed for the first
time. Additionally, a first energy-dependent analysis is presented and compared
to recent predictions. We use seven years of IceCube data for the Moon and the
Sun and compare them to simulations on data rate level. The simulations are
performed for the geometrical shadow hypothesis for the Moon and the Sun and
for a cosmic-ray propagation model governed by the solar magnetic field for the
case of the Sun. We find that a linearly decreasing relationship between Sun
shadow strength and solar activity is preferred over a constant relationship at
the 6.4sigma level. We test two commonly used models of the coronal magnetic
field, both combined with a Parker spiral, by modeling cosmic-ray propagation
in the solar magnetic field. Both models predict a weakening of the shadow in
times of high solar activity as it is also visible in the data. We find
tensions with the data on the order of $3\sigma$ for both models, assuming only
statistical uncertainties. The magnetic field model CSSS fits the data slightly
better than the PFSS model. This is generally consistent with what is found
previously by the Tibet AS-gamma Experiment, a deviation of the data from the
two models is, however, not significant at this point. Regarding the energy
dependence of the Sun shadow, we find indications that the shadowing effect
increases with energy during times of high solar activity, in agreement with
theoretical predictions.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.07981 [pdf] - 2066492
Constraining Dark-Matter Ensembles with Supernova Data
Submitted: 2019-09-17, last modified: 2020-03-17
The constraints on non-minimal dark sectors involving ensembles of unstable
dark-matter species are well established and quite stringent in cases in which
these species decay to visible-sector particles. However, in cases in which
these ensembles decay exclusively to other, lighter dark-sector states, the
corresponding constraints are less well established. In this paper, we
investigate how information about the expansion rate of the universe at low
redshifts gleaned from observations of Type Ia supernovae can be used to
constrain ensembles of unstable particles which decay primarily into dark
radiation.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.10605 [pdf] - 2050215
Fermi and Swift Observations of GRB 190114C: Tracing the Evolution of
High-Energy Emission from Prompt to Afterglow
Ajello, M.;
Arimoto, M.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Berretta, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bottacini, E.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Buehler, R.;
Burns, E.;
Buson, S.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caputo, R.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Chen, S.;
Chiaro, G.;
Ciprini, S.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Costantin, D.;
Cutini, S.;
D'Ammando, F.;
DeKlotz, M.;
Luque, P. de la Torre;
de Palma, F.;
Desai, A.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Venere, L.;
Dirirsa, F. Fana;
Fegan, S. J.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Gill, R.;
Giordano, F.;
Giroletti, M.;
Granot, J.;
Green, D.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Grondin, M. H.;
Guiriec, S.;
Hays, E.;
Horan, D.;
Jóhannesson, G.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kovac'evic', M.;
Kuss, M.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Lemoine-Goumard, M.;
Li, J.;
Liodakis, I.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lovellette, M. N.;
Lubrano, P.;
Maldera, S.;
Malyshev, D.;
Manfreda, A.;
Martí-Devesa, G.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Mereu, I.;
Meyer, M.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mitthumsiri, W.;
Mizuno, T.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Moretti, E.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paliya, V. S.;
Paneque, D.;
Pei, Z.;
Persic, M.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Petrosian, V.;
Piron, F.;
Poon, H.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Rainò, S.;
Rando, R.;
Rani, B.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Ryde, F.;
Parkinson, P. M. Saz;
Serini, D.;
Sgrò, C.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Tajima, H.;
Takagi, K.;
Takahashi, M. N.;
Tak, D.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Torres, D. F.;
Troja, E.;
Valverde, J.;
Van Klaveren, B.;
Wood, K.;
Yassine, M.;
Zaharijas, G.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cleveland, W.;
Giles, M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hui, M.;
Malacaria, C.;
Preece, R.;
Roberts, O.;
Veres, P.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cenko, S. B.;
O'Brien, P.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Lien, A.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Tohuvavohu, A.;
D'Elia, V.;
D'A, A.;
Perri, M.;
Gropp, J.;
Klingler, N.;
Capalbi, M.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Stamatikos, M.
Submitted: 2019-09-23, last modified: 2020-01-23
We report on the observations of gamma-ray burst (GRB) 190114C by the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. The
early-time observations reveal multiple emission components that evolve
independently, with a delayed power-law component that exhibits significant
spectral attenuation above 40 MeV in the first few seconds of the burst. This
power-law component transitions to a harder spectrum that is consistent with
the afterglow emission observed at later times. This afterglow component is
clearly identifiable in the GBM and BAT light curves as a slowly fading
emission component on which the rest of the prompt emission is superimposed. As
a result, we are able to constrain the transition from internal shock to
external shock dominated emission. We find that the temporal and spectral
evolution of the broadband afterglow emission can be well modeled as
synchrotron emission from a forward shock propagating into a wind-like
circumstellar environment and find that high-energy photons observed by Fermi
LAT are in tension with the theoretical maximum energy that can be achieved
through synchrotron emission from a shock. These violations of the maximum
synchrotron energy are further compounded by the detection of very high energy
(VHE) emission above 300 GeV by MAGIC concurrent with our observations. We
conclude that the observations of VHE photons from GRB 190114C necessitates
either an additional emission mechanism at very high energies that is hidden in
the synchrotron component in the LAT energy range, an acceleration mechanism
that imparts energy to the particles at a rate that is faster than the electron
synchrotron energy loss rate, or revisions of the fundamental assumptions used
in estimating the maximum photon energy attainable through the synchrotron
process.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.07510 [pdf] - 2034720
The Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background
Submitted: 2020-01-15
The Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background (DSNB) in the MeV regime represents
the cumulative cosmic neutrino emission, predominantly due to core collapse
supernovae. We estimate the DSNB flux for different Star Formation Rate Density
(SFRD) models. We find that the DSNB flux estimated using the SFRD derived from
Fermi-LAT Collaboration et al. (2018) is significantly higher ($\approx$
32$\%$) relative to the flux estimated using the SFRD from Madau & Fragos
(2017). This depicts the sensitivity between the DSNB flux and the SFRD
estimates which shows that future detection of the DSNB can be used as a
valuable tool to constrain the SFRD.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.12097 [pdf] - 2005404
A new measurement of the Hubble constant and matter content of the
Universe using extragalactic background light $\gamma$-ray attenuation
Domínguez, Alberto;
Wojtak, Radoslaw;
Finke, Justin;
Ajello, Marco;
Helgason, Kari;
Prada, Francisco;
Desai, Abhishek;
Paliya, Vaidehi;
Marcotulli, Lea;
Hartmann, Dieter
Submitted: 2019-03-28, last modified: 2019-11-08
The Hubble constant $H_{0}$ and matter density $\Omega_{m}$ of the Universe
are measured using the latest $\gamma$-ray attenuation results from Fermi-LAT
and Cherenkov telescopes. This methodology is based upon the fact that the
extragalactic background light supplies opacity for very high energy photons
via photon-photon interaction. The amount of $\gamma$-ray attenuation along the
line of sight depends on the expansion rate and matter content of the Universe.
This novel strategy results in a value of
$H_{0}=67.4_{-6.2}^{+6.0}$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ and
$\Omega_{m}=0.14_{-0.07}^{+0.06}$. These estimates are independent and
complementary to those based on the distance ladder, cosmic microwave
background (CMB), clustering with weak lensing, and strong lensing data. We
also produce a joint likelihood analysis of our results from $\gamma$ rays and
these from more mature methodologies, excluding the CMB, yielding a combined
value of $H_{0}=66.6\pm 1.6$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ and $\Omega_{m}=0.29\pm
0.02$.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.02079 [pdf] - 1877344
Unresolved Gamma-Ray Sky through its Angular Power Spectrum
Ackermann, M.;
Ajello, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Ballet, J.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bottacini, E.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Buehler, R.;
Burns, E.;
Buson, S.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caputo, R.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Chen, S.;
Chiaro, G.;
Ciprini, S.;
Costantin, D.;
Cuoco, A.;
Cutini, S.;
D'Ammando, F.;
Luque, P. de la Torre;
de Palma, F.;
Desai, A.;
Digel, S. W.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Mauro, M.;
Di Venere, L.;
Dirirsa, F. Fana;
Favuzzi, C.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Giroletti, M.;
Green, D.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Guillemot, L.;
Guiriec, S.;
Horan, D.;
Johannesson, G.;
Kuss, M.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Li, J.;
Liodakis, I.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lubrano, P.;
Magill, J. D.;
Maldera, S.;
Malyshev, D.;
Manfreda, A.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
Mereu, I.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mitthumsiri, W.;
Mizuno, T.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paliya, V. S.;
Paneque, D.;
Persic, M.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Petrosian, V.;
Piron, F.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Raino, S.;
Rando, R.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Serini, D.;
Sgro, C.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Suson, D. J.;
Tajima, H.;
Takahashi, M.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Tibaldo, L.;
Torres, D. F.;
Troja, E.;
Venters, T. M.;
Vianello, G.;
Wood, K.;
Yassine, M.;
Zaharijas, G.;
Ammazzalorso, S.;
Fornengo, N.;
Regis, M.
Submitted: 2018-12-05, last modified: 2019-05-03
The gamma-ray sky has been observed with unprecedented accuracy in the last
decade by the Fermi large area telescope (LAT), allowing us to resolve and
understand the high-energy Universe. The nature of the remaining unresolved
emission (unresolved gamma-ray background, UGRB) below the LAT source detection
threshold can be uncovered by characterizing the amplitude and angular scale of
the UGRB fluctuation field. This work presents a measurement of the UGRB
autocorrelation angular power spectrum based on eight years of Fermi LAT Pass 8
data products. The analysis is designed to be robust against contamination from
resolved sources and noise systematics. The sensitivity to subthreshold sources
is greatly enhanced with respect to previous measurements. We find evidence
(with $\sim$3.7$\sigma$ significance) that the scenario in which two classes of
sources contribute to the UGRB signal is favored over a single class. A double
power law with exponential cutoff can explain the anisotropy energy spectrum
well, with photon indices of the two populations being 2.55 $\pm$ 0.23 and 1.86
$\pm$ 0.15.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.03126 [pdf] - 1860067
A GeV-TeV Measurement of the Extragalactic Background Light
Submitted: 2019-03-07, last modified: 2019-03-11
The Extragalactic Background Light (EBL) can be probed via the absorption
imprint it leaves in the spectra of gamma-ray sources ($\gamma\gamma
\rightarrow e^-e^+$). We recently developed a dedicated technique to
reconstruct the EBL, and its evolution with redshift, from $\gamma$ ray optical
depth data using a large sample of blazars detected by the $Fermi$ Large Area
Telescope. Here, we extend this dataset to the TeV regime using ground-based
Cherenkov observations of 38 blazars and report the first homogeneous
measurement of the EBL spectral intensity covering the ultraviolet to infrared
wavelengths ($\sim$0.1-100$\mathrm{\mu m}$). A minimal EBL throughout the
wavelength range with respect to integrated galaxy light is found, allowing
little additional unresolved emission from faint or truly diffuse populations
setting an upper limit of $\lesssim 4~{\rm nW\cdot m^{-2}sr^{-1}}$ at 1.4 ${\rm
\mu m}$. In particular, the cosmic optical background (COB) at $z=0$ is found
to be $27.8_{-2.0}^{+2.1}~{\rm nW\cdot m^{-2}sr^{-1}}$. This work lays the
foundation for accurate gamma-ray measurements of the EBL across its whole
spectral range using a combination of GeV and TeV data.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.10983 [pdf] - 1841531
Identifying the 3FHL catalog: CTIO results
Submitted: 2019-01-30, last modified: 2019-01-31
Active galactic Nuclei (AGNs) with their relativistic jets pointed towards
the observer, form a subclass of luminous gamma-ray sources commonly known as
blazars. The study of blazars is essential to improve our understanding on the
AGNs emission mechanisms and evolution, as well as to map the extragalactic
background light. To do so, however, one needs to correctly classify and
measure a redshift for a large sample of these sources. The Third {\it
Fermi}--LAT Catalog of High-Energy Sources (3FHL) contains $\approx1160$
blazars reported at energies greater than $10$\,GeV. However $\sim$25\% of
these sources are unclassified and $\sim$50\% lack of redshift information. To
increase the spectral completeness of the 3FHL catalog, we are working on an
optical spectroscopic follow up campaign using 4--m and 8--m telescopes. In
this paper, we present the results of the second part of this campaign, where
we observed 23 blazars using the 4\,$m$ telescope at CTIO in Chile. We report
all the 23 sources to be classified as BL Lacs, a confirmed redshift
measurement for 3 sources, a redshift lower limit for 2 sources and a tentative
redshift measurement for 3 sources.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.03982 [pdf] - 2006561
MAGIC and Fermi-LAT gamma-ray results on unassociated HAWC sources
Ahnen, M. L.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Arcaro, C.;
Baack, D.;
Babić, A.;
Banerjee, B.;
Bangale, P.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
González, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bernardini, E.;
Berse, R. Ch.;
Berti, A.;
Bhattacharyya, W.;
Biland, A.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Carosi, R.;
Carosi, A.;
Ceribella, G.;
Chatterjee, A.;
Colak, S. M.;
Colin, P.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
Cumani, P.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Lotto, B.;
Delfino, M.;
Delgado, J.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Domínguez, A.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Einecke, S.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Ramazani, V. Fallah;
Fernández-Barral, A.;
Fidalgo, D.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Fruck, C.;
Galindo, D.;
López, R. J. García;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gaug, M.;
Giammaria, P.;
Godinović, N.;
Gora, D.;
Guberman, D.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hahn, A.;
Hassan, T.;
Hayashida, M.;
Herrera, J.;
Hose, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Ishio, K.;
Konno, Y.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
Kuveždić, D.;
Lelas, D.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
Maggio, C.;
Majumdar, P.;
Makariev, M.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martínez, M.;
Masuda, S.;
Mazin, D.;
Mielke, K.;
Minev, M.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Moralejo, A.;
Moreno, V.;
Moretti, E.;
Nagayoshi, T.;
Neustroev, V.;
Niedzwiecki, A.;
Rosillo, M. Nievas;
Nigro, C.;
Nilsson, K.;
Ninci, D.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogués, L.;
Paiano, S.;
Palacio, J.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Pedaletti, G.;
Peresano, M.;
Persic, M.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Garcia, J. R.;
Reichardt, I.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Righi, C.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Saito, T.;
Satalecka, K.;
Schweizer, T.;
Sitarek, J.;
Šnidarić, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Stamerra, A.;
Strzys, M.;
Surić, T.;
Takahashi, M.;
Takalo, L.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzić, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Torres-Albà, N.;
Treves, A.;
Tsujimoto, S.;
Vanzo, G.;
Acosta, M. Vazquez;
Vovk, I.;
Ward, J. E.;
Will, M.;
Zarić, D.;
Albert, A.;
Alfaro, R.;
Alvarez, C.;
Arceo, R.;
Arteaga-Velázquez, J. C.;
Rojas, D. Avila;
Solares, H. A. Ayala;
Becerril, A.;
Belmont-Moreno, E.;
BenZvi, S. Y.;
Bernal, A.;
Braun, J.;
Caballero-Mora, K. S.;
Capistrán, T.;
Carramiñana, A.;
Casanova, S.;
Castillo, M.;
Cotti, U.;
Cotzomi, J.;
de León, S. Coutiño;
De León, C.;
De la Fuente, E.;
Hernandez, R. Diaz;
Dichiara, S.;
Dingus, B. L.;
DuVernois, M. A.;
Díaz-Vélez, J. C.;
Ellsworth, R. W.;
Engel, K.;
Enriquez-Rivera, O.;
Fiorino, D. W.;
Fleischhack, H.;
Fraija, N.;
García-González, J. A.;
Garfias, F.;
González-Muñoz, A.;
González, M. M.;
Goodman, J. A.;
Hampel-Arias, Z.;
Harding, J. P.;
Hernandez, S.;
Hueyotl-Zahuantitla, F.;
Hui, C. M.;
Hüntemeyer, P.;
Iriarte, A.;
Jardin-Blicq, A.;
Joshi, V.;
Kaufmann, S.;
Lara, A.;
Lauer, R. J.;
Lee, W. H.;
Lennarz, D.;
Vargas, H. León;
Linnemann, J. T.;
Longinotti, A. L.;
Luis-Raya, G.;
Luna-García, R.;
López-Coto, R.;
Malone, K.;
Marinelli, S. S.;
Martinez, O.;
Martinez-Castellanos, I.;
Martínez-Castro, J.;
Martínez-Huerta, H.;
Matthews, J. A.;
Miranda-Romagnoli, P.;
Moreno, E.;
Mostafá, M.;
Nayerhoda, A.;
Nellen, L.;
Newbold, M.;
Nisa, M. U.;
Noriega-Papaqui, R.;
Pelayo, R.;
Pretz, J.;
Pérez-Pérez, E. G.;
Ren, Z.;
Rho, C. D.;
Rivière, C.;
Rosa-González, D.;
Rosenberg, M.;
Ruiz-Velasco, E.;
Greus, F. Salesa;
Sandoval, A.;
Schneider, M.;
Arroyo, M. Seglar;
Sinnis, G.;
Smith, A. J.;
Springer, R. W.;
Surajbali, P.;
Taboada, I.;
Tibolla, O.;
Tollefson, K.;
Torres, I.;
Ukwatta, T. N.;
Vianello, G.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Werner, F.;
Westerhoff, S.;
Wood, J.;
Yapici, T.;
Yodh, G.;
Zepeda, A.;
Zhou, H.;
Álvarez, J. D.;
Ajello, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Berenji, B.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bottacini, E.;
Brandt, T. J.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caputo, R.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Castro, D.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Chiaro, G.;
Ciprini, S.;
Costantin, D.;
D'Ammando, F.;
de Palma, F.;
Desai, A.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Mauro, M.;
Di Venere, L.;
Domínguez, A.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Giroletti, M.;
Glanzman, T.;
Green, D.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Guiriec, S.;
Harding, A. K.;
Hays, E.;
Hewitt, J. W.;
Horan, D.;
Jóhannesson, G.;
Kuss, M.;
Larsson, S.;
Liodakis, I.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lubrano, P.;
Magill, J. D.;
Maldera, S.;
Manfreda, A.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
Mereu, I.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mizuno, T.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Ormes, J. F.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paliya, V. S.;
Persic, M.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Petrosian, V.;
Piron, F.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Rainò, S.;
Rani, B.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Sgrò, C.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Tajima, H.;
Takahashi, M.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Torres, D. F.;
Torresi, E.;
Troja, E.;
Valverde, J.;
Wood, K.;
Yassine, M.
Submitted: 2019-01-13
The HAWC Collaboration released the 2HWC catalog of TeV sources, in which 19
show no association with any known high-energy (HE; E > 10 GeV) or
very-high-energy (VHE; E > 300 GeV) sources. This catalog motivated follow-up
studies by both the MAGIC and Fermi-LAT observatories with the aim of
investigating gamma-ray emission over a broad energy band. In this paper, we
report the results from the first joint work between HAWC, MAGIC and Fermi-LAT
on three unassociated HAWC sources: 2HWC J2006+341, 2HWC J1907+084* and 2HWC
J1852+013*. Although no significant detection was found in the HE and VHE
regimes, this investigation shows that a minimum 1 degree extension (at 95%
confidence level) and harder spectrum in the GeV than the one extrapolated from
HAWC results are required in the case of 2HWC J1852+013*, while a simply
minimum extension of 0.16 degrees (at 95% confidence level) can already explain
the scenario proposed by HAWC for the remaining sources. Moreover, the
hypothesis that these sources are pulsar wind nebulae is also investigated in
detail.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.01031 [pdf] - 1791950
A $\gamma$-ray determination of the Universe's star-formation history
Submitted: 2018-12-03
The light emitted by all galaxies over the history of the Universe produces
the extragalactic background light (EBL) at ultraviolet, optical, and infrared
wavelengths. The EBL is a source of opacity for $\gamma$ rays via photon-photon
interactions, leaving an imprint in the spectra of distant $\gamma$-ray
sources. We measure this attenuation using {739} active galaxies and one
gamma-ray burst detected by the {\it Fermi} Large Area Telescope. This allows
us to reconstruct the evolution of the EBL and determine the star-formation
history of the Universe over 90\% of cosmic time. Our star-formation history is
consistent with independent measurements from galaxy surveys, peaking at
redshift $z\sim2$. Upper limits of the EBL at the epoch of re-ionization
suggest a turnover in the abundance of faint galaxies at $z\sim 6$.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.02535 [pdf] - 1593687
Probing the EBL evolution at high redshift using GRBs detected with the
Fermi-LAT
Submitted: 2017-10-06
The extragalactic background light (EBL), from ultraviolet to infrared
wavelengths, is predominantly due to emission from stars, accreting black holes
and reprocessed light due to Galactic dust. The EBL can be studied through the
imprint it leaves, via $\gamma$-$\gamma$ absorption of high-energy photons, in
the spectra of distant $\gamma$-ray sources. The EBL has been probed through
the search for the attenuation it produces in the spectra of BL Lacertae (BL
Lac) objects and individual $\gamma$-ray bursts (GRBs). GRBs have significant
advantages over blazars for the study of the EBL especially at high redshifts.
Here we analyze a combined sample of twenty-two GRBs, detected by the Fermi
Large Area Telescope between 65 MeV and 500 GeV. We report a marginal detection
(at the ~2.8 $\sigma$ level) of the EBL attenuation in the stacked spectra of
the source sample. This measurement represents a first constraint of the EBL at
an effective redshift of ~1.8. We combine our results with prior EBL
constraints and conclude that Fermi-LAT is instrumental to constrain the UV
component of the EBL. We discuss the implications on existing empirical models
of EBL evolution.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.03165 [pdf] - 1580856
The second catalog of flaring gamma-ray sources from the Fermi All-sky
Variability Analysis
Abdollahi, S.;
Ackermann, M.;
Ajello, M.;
Albert, A.;
Baldini, L.;
Ballet, J.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Gonzalez, J. Becerra;
Bellazzini, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bloom, E. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bottacini, E.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Buehler, R.;
Buson, S.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caragiulo, M.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Cecchi, C.;
Chekhtman, A.;
Cheung, C. C.;
Chiaro, G.;
Ciprini, S.;
Conrad, J.;
Costantin, D.;
Costanza, F.;
Cutini, S.;
D'Ammando, F.;
de Palma, F.;
Desai, A.;
Desiante, R.;
Digel, S. W.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Mauro, M.;
Di Venere, L.;
Donaggio, B.;
Drell, P. S.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Fegan, S. J.;
Ferrara, E. C.;
Focke, W. B.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giomi, M.;
Giordano, F.;
Giroletti, M.;
Glanzman, T.;
Green, D.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Grove, J. E.;
Guillemot, L.;
Guiriec, S.;
Hays, E.;
Horan, D.;
Jogler, T.;
Jóhannesson, G.;
Johnson, A. S.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kuss, M.;
La Mura, G.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Li, J.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lovellette, M. N.;
Lubrano, P.;
Magill, J. D.;
Maldera, S.;
Manfreda, A.;
Mayer, M.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mitthumsiri, W.;
Mizuno, T.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Ohsugi, T.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Paliya, V. S.;
Paneque, D.;
Perkins, J. S.;
Persic, M.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Petrosian, V.;
Piron, F.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Rainò, S.;
Rando, R.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Sgrò, C.;
Simone, D.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Spada, F.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Stawarz, L.;
Suson, D. J.;
Takahashi, M.;
Tanaka, K.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Torres, D. F.;
Torresi, E.;
Tosti, G.;
Troja, E.;
Vianello, G.;
Wood, K. S.
Submitted: 2016-12-09, last modified: 2017-09-12
We present the second catalog of flaring gamma-ray sources (2FAV) detected
with the Fermi All-sky Variability Analysis (FAVA), a tool that blindly
searches for transients over the entire sky observed by the Large Area
Telescope (LAT) on board the \textit{Fermi} Gamma-ray Space Telescope. With
respect to the first FAVA catalog, this catalog benefits from a larger data
set, the latest LAT data release (Pass 8), as well as from an improved analysis
that includes likelihood techniques for a more precise localization of the
transients. Applying this analysis on the first 7.4 years of \textit{Fermi}
observations, and in two separate energy bands 0.1$-$0.8 GeV and 0.8$-$300 GeV,
a total of 4547 flares has been detected with a significance greater than
$6\sigma$ (before trials), on the time scale of one week. Through spatial
clustering of these flares, 518 variable gamma-ray sources are identified.
Likely counterparts, based on positional coincidence, have been found for 441
sources, mostly among the blazar class of active galactic nuclei. For 77 2FAV
sources, no likely gamma-ray counterpart has been found. For each source in the
catalog, we provide the time, location, and spectrum of each flaring episode.
Studying the spectra of the flares, we observe a harder-when-brighter behavior
for flares associated with blazars, with the exception of BL Lac flares
detected in the low-energy band. The photon indexes of the flares are never
significantly smaller than 1.5. For a leptonic model, and under the assumption
of isotropy, this limit suggests that the spectrum of the freshly accelerated
electrons is never harder than $p\sim$2.