Normalized to: DeRose, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.10162 [pdf] - 2117715
$\mu_{\star}$ Masses: Weak Lensing Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey
Year 1 redMaPPer Clusters using Stellar Masses
Pereira, M. E. S.;
Palmese, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
McClintock, T.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Burgad, J.;
Annis, J.;
Farahi, A.;
Lin, H.;
Choi, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Esteves, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
MacCrann, N.;
Roodman, A.;
Sánchez, C.;
Shin, T.;
von der Linden, A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2020-06-17
We present the weak lensing mass calibration of the stellar mass based
$\mu_{\star}$ mass proxy for redMaPPer galaxy clusters in the Dark Energy
Survey Year 1. For the first time we are able to perform a calibration of
$\mu_{\star}$ at high redshifts, $z>0.33$. In a blinded analysis, we use $\sim
6,000$ clusters split into 12 subsets spanning the ranges $0.1 \leqslant
z<0.65$ and $\mu_{\star}$ up to $\sim 5.5 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}$, and infer
the average masses of these subsets through modelling of their stacked weak
lensing signal. In our model we account for the following sources of systematic
uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors, miscentring,
cluster-member contamination of the source sample, deviations from the NFW halo
profile, halo triaxiality and projection effects. We use the inferred masses to
estimate the joint mass--$\mu_{\star}$--$z$ scaling relation given by $\langle
M_{200c} | \mu_{\star},z \rangle = M_0 (\mu_{\star}/5.16\times 10^{12}
\mathrm{M_{\odot}})^{F_{\mu_{\star}}} ((1+z)/1.35)^{G_z}$. We find $M_0= (1.14
\pm 0.07) \times 10^{14} \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ with $F_{\mu_{\star}}= 0.76 \pm
0.06$ and $G_z= -1.14 \pm 0.37$. We discuss the use of $\mu_{\star}$ as a
complementary mass proxy to the well-studied richness $\lambda$ for: $i)$
exploring the regimes of low $z$, $\lambda<20$ and high $\lambda$, $z \sim 1$;
$ii)$ testing systematics such as projection effects for applications in
cluster cosmology.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.04294 [pdf] - 2109338
Shadows in the Dark: Low-Surface-Brightness Galaxies Discovered in the
Dark Energy Survey
Tanoglidis, D.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Wei, K.;
Li, T. S.;
Sánchez, F. J.;
Zhang, Y.;
Peter, A. H. G.;
Feldmeier-Krause, A.;
Prat, J.;
Casey, K.;
Palmese, A.;
Sánchez, C.;
DeRose, J.;
Conselice, C.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Chang, C.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Huterer, D.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2020-06-07
We present a catalog of 20,977 extended low-surface-brightness galaxies
(LSBGs) identified in ~ 5000 deg$^2$ from the first three years of imaging data
from the Dark Energy Survey (DES). Based on a single-component S\'ersic model
fit, we define extended LSBGs as galaxies with $g$-band effective radii
$R_{\scriptsize{eff}} > 2.5"$ and mean surface brightness
$\bar{\mu}_{\scriptsize{eff}}(g) > 24.3$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$. We find that the
distribution of LSBGs is strongly bimodal in $(g-r)$ vs. $(g-i$) color space.
We divide our sample into red ($g-i \geq 0.59$) and blue ($g-i<0.59$) galaxies
and study the properties of the two populations. Redder LSBGs are more
clustered than their blue counterparts, and are correlated with the
distribution of nearby ($z < 0.10$) bright galaxies. Red LSBGs constitute $\sim
35\%$ of our LSBG sample, and $\sim 30\%$ of these are located within 1 deg of
low-redshift galaxy groups and clusters (compared to $\sim 8\%$ of the blue
LSBGs). For nine of the most prominent galaxy groups and clusters, we calculate
the physical properties of associated LSBGs assuming a redshift derived from
the host system. In these systems, we identify 108 objects that can be
classified as ultra-diffuse galaxies, defined as LSBGs with projected physical
effective radii $R_{\scriptsize{eff}} > 1.5$ kpc. The wide-area sample of LSBGs
in DES can be used to test the role of environment on models of LSBG formation
and evolution.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.10454 [pdf] - 2129267
The impact of spectroscopic incompleteness in direct calibration of
redshift distributions for weak lensing surveys
Hartley, W. G.;
Chang, C.;
Samani, S.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Davis, T. M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Asorey, J.;
Gschwend, J.;
Lidman, C.;
Kuehn, K.;
King, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
DeRose, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Chinchon, F. Paz-;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Wilkinson, R. D.
Submitted: 2020-03-23
Obtaining accurate distributions of galaxy redshifts is a critical aspect of
weak lensing cosmology experiments. One of the methods used to estimate and
validate redshift distributions is apply weights to a spectroscopic sample so
that their weighted photometry distribution matches the target sample. In this
work we estimate the \textit{selection bias} in redshift that is introduced in
this procedure. We do so by simulating the process of assembling a
spectroscopic sample (including observer-assigned confidence flags) and
highlight the impacts of spectroscopic target selection and redshift failures.
We use the first year (Y1) weak lensing analysis in DES as an example data set
but the implications generalise to all similar weak lensing surveys. We find
that using colour cuts that are not available to the weak lensing galaxies can
introduce biases of $\Delta~z\sim0.015$ in the weighted mean redshift of
different redshift intervals. To assess the impact of incompleteness in
spectroscopic samples, we select only objects with high observer-defined
confidence flags and compare the weighted mean redshift with the true mean. We
find that the mean redshift of the DES Y1 weak lensing sample is typically
biased at the $\Delta~z=0.005-0.05$ level after the weighting is applied. The
bias we uncover can have either sign, depending on the samples and redshift
interval considered. For the highest redshift bin, the bias is larger than the
uncertainties in the other DES Y1 redshift calibration methods, justifying the
decision of not using this method for the redshift estimations. We discuss
several methods to mitigate this bias.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.11124 [pdf] - 2055421
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster
Abundances and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, Tim;
Aguena, Michel;
Alarcon, Alex;
Allam, Sahar;
Allen, Steve;
Annis, James;
Avila, Santiago;
Bacon, David;
Bermeo, Alberto;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Bhargava, Sunayana;
Bocquet, Sebastian;
Brooks, David;
Brout, Dillon;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Burke, David;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Carretero, Jorge;
Castander, Francisco Javier;
Cawthon, Ross;
Chang, Chihway;
Chen, Xinyi;
Choi, Ami;
Costanzi, Matteo;
Crocce, Martin;
da Costa, Luiz;
Davis, Tamara;
De Vicente, Juan;
DeRose, Joseph;
Desai, Shantanu;
Diehl, H. Thomas;
Dietrich, Jörg;
Dodelson, Scott;
Doel, Peter;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Eckert, Kathleen;
Eifler, Tim;
Elvin-Poole, Jack;
Estrada, Juan;
Everett, Spencer;
Evrard, August;
Farahi, Arya;
Ferrero, Ismael;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gatti, Marco;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Gerdes, David;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Giles, Paul;
Grandis, Sebastian;
Gruen, Daniel;
Gruendl, Robert;
Gschwend, Julia;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Hartley, Will;
Hinton, Samuel;
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Honscheid, Klaus;
Hoyle, Ben;
Huterer, Dragan;
James, David;
Jarvis, Mike;
Jeltema, Tesla;
Johnson, Margaret;
Kent, Stephen;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Kron, Richard;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lahav, Ofer;
Li, Ting;
Lidman, Christopher;
Lima, Marcos;
Lin, Huan;
MacCrann, Niall;
Maia, Marcio;
Mantz, Adam;
Marshall, Jennifer;
Martini, Paul;
Mayers, Julian;
Melchior, Peter;
Mena, Juan;
Menanteau, Felipe;
Miquel, Ramon;
Mohr, Joe;
Nichol, Robert;
Nord, Brian;
Ogando, Ricardo;
Palmese, Antonella;
Paz-Chinchon, Francisco;
Malagón, Andrés Plazas;
Prat, Judit;
Rau, Markus Michael;
Romer, Kathy;
Roodman, Aaron;
Rooney, Philip;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Sako, Masao;
Samuroff, Simon;
Sanchez, Carles;
Saro, Alexandro;
Scarpine, Vic;
Schubnell, Michael;
Scolnic, Daniel;
Serrano, Santiago;
Sevilla, Ignacio;
Sheldon, Erin;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly;
Tarle, Gregory;
Thomas, Daniel;
To, Chun-Hao;
Troxel, Michael A.;
Tucker, Douglas;
Varga, Tamas Norbert;
von der Linden, Anja;
Walker, Alistair;
Wechsler, Risa;
Weller, Jochen;
Wilkinson, Reese;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Yanny, Brian;
Zhang, Zhuowen;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2020-02-25
We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of
redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset.
Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as
were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in
surprisingly low values for $S_8 =\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm
0.04$, driven by a low matter density parameter, $\Omega_{\rm
m}=0.179^{+0.031}_{-0.038}$, with $\sigma_8-\Omega_{\rm m}$ posteriors in
$2.4\sigma$ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in $5.6\sigma$ with the
Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding
changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with
other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact
that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations,
cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster
analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence
of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant
physics. Cross checks with X-ray and microwave data, as well as independent
constraints on the observable--mass relation from SZ selected clusters, suggest
that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather
than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness
threshold ($\lambda \ge 30$) significantly reduces the tension with other
probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by
our model.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.03621 [pdf] - 2029805
Evaluation of probabilistic photometric redshift estimation approaches
for LSST
Schmidt, S. J.;
Malz, A. I.;
Soo, J. Y. H.;
Almosallam, I. A.;
Brescia, M.;
Cavuoti, S.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Connolly, A. J.;
DeRose, J.;
Freeman, P. E.;
Graham, M. L.;
Iyer, K. G.;
Jarvis, M. J.;
Kalmbach, J. B.;
Kovacs, E.;
Lee, A. B.;
Longo, G.;
Morrison, C. B.;
Newman, J. A.;
Nourbakhsh, E.;
Nuss, E.;
Pospisil, T.;
Tranin, H.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zhou, R.;
Izbicki, R.;
Collaboration, The LSST Dark Energy Science
Submitted: 2020-01-10
Many scientific investigations of photometric galaxy surveys require redshift
estimates, whose uncertainty properties are best encapsulated by photometric
redshift (photo-z) posterior probability density functions (PDFs). A plethora
of photo-z PDF estimation methodologies abound, producing discrepant results
with no consensus on a preferred approach. We present the results of a
comprehensive experiment comparing twelve photo-z algorithms applied to mock
data produced for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) Dark Energy
Science Collaboration (DESC). By supplying perfect prior information, in the
form of the complete template library and a representative training set as
inputs to each code, we demonstrate the impact of the assumptions underlying
each technique on the output photo-z PDFs. In the absence of a notion of true,
unbiased photo-z PDFs, we evaluate and interpret multiple metrics of the
ensemble properties of the derived photo-z PDFs as well as traditional
reductions to photo-z point estimates. We report systematic biases and overall
over/under-breadth of the photo-z PDFs of many popular codes, which may
indicate avenues for improvement in the algorithms or implementations.
Furthermore, we raise attention to the limitations of established metrics for
assessing photo-z PDF accuracy; though we identify the conditional density
estimate (CDE) loss as a promising metric of photo-z PDF performance in the
case where true redshifts are available but true photo-z PDFs are not, we
emphasize the need for science-specific performance metrics.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.08813 [pdf] - 2057676
Stellar mass as a galaxy cluster mass proxy: application to the Dark
Energy Survey redMaPPer clusters
Palmese, A.;
Annis, J.;
Burgad, J.;
Farahi, A.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Welch, B.;
Pereira, M. da Silva;
Lin, H.;
Bhargava, S.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Wilkinson, R.;
Giles, P.;
Jeltema, T.;
Romer, A. K.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Hilton, M.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Bermeo, A.;
Mayers, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lahav, O.;
Leistedt, B.;
McClintock, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Varga, T. N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zhang, Y.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Collins, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Liddle, A.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mann, R. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Sahlen, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stott, J.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Viana, P. T. P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2019-03-20, last modified: 2019-11-18
We introduce a galaxy cluster mass observable, $\mu_\star$, based on the
stellar masses of cluster members, and we present results for the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Year 1 observations. Stellar masses are computed using a Bayesian
Model Averaging method, and are validated for DES data using simulations and
COSMOS data. We show that $\mu_\star$ works as a promising mass proxy by
comparing our predictions to X-ray measurements. We measure the X-ray
temperature-$\mu_\star$ relation for a total of 150 clusters matched between
the wide-field DES Year 1 redMaPPer catalogue, and Chandra and XMM archival
observations, spanning the redshift range $0.1<z<0.7$. For a scaling relation
which is linear in logarithmic space, we find a slope of $\alpha =
0.488\pm0.043$ and a scatter in the X-ray temperature at fixed $\mu_\star$ of
$\sigma_{{\rm ln} T_X|\mu_\star}=0.266^{+0.019}_{-0.020}$ for the joint sample.
By using the halo mass scaling relations of the X-ray temperature from the
Weighing the Giants program, we further derive the $\mu_\star$-conditioned
scatter in mass, finding $\sigma_{{\rm ln} M|\mu_\star}=0.26^{+ 0.15}_{-
0.10}$. These results are competitive with well-established cluster mass
proxies used for cosmological analyses, showing that $\mu_\star$ can be used as
a reliable and physically motivated mass proxy to derive cosmological
constraints.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05568 [pdf] - 1998159
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology with moments of weak
lensing mass maps -- validation on simulations
Gatti, M.;
Chang, C.;
Friedrich, O.;
Jain, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Ferrero, I.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Harrison, I.;
Jeffrey, N.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Secco, L.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Crocce, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchon, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
collaboration, the DES
Submitted: 2019-11-13
We present a simulated cosmology analysis using the second and third moments
of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps. The analysis is geared towards the
third year (Y3) data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), but the methodology can
be applied to other weak lensing data sets. The second moment, or variances, of
the convergence as a function of smoothing scale contains information similar
to standard shear 2-point statistics. The third moment, or the skewness,
contains additional non-Gaussian information. We present the formalism for
obtaining the convergence maps from the measured shear and for obtaining the
second and third moments of these maps given partial sky coverage. We estimate
the covariance matrix from a large suite of numerical simulations. We test our
pipeline through a simulated likelihood analyses varying 5 cosmological
parameters and 10 nuisance parameters. Our forecast shows that the combination
of second and third moments provides a 1.5 percent constraint on $S_8 \equiv
\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ for DES Y3 data. This is 20 percent better
than an analysis using a simulated DES Y3 shear 2-point statistics, owing to
the non-Gaussian information captured by the inclusion of higher-order
statistics. The methodology developed here can be applied to current and future
weak lensing datasets to make use of information from non-Gaussianity in the
cosmic density field and to improve constraints on cosmological parameters.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.01386 [pdf] - 1996113
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: The relationship between mass and
light around cosmic voids
Fang, Y.;
Hamaus, N.;
Jain, B.;
Pandey, S.;
Pollina, G.;
Sánchez, C.;
Kovács, A.;
Chang, C.;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Choi, A.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztañaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Zuntz, J.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2019-09-03, last modified: 2019-11-11
What are the mass and galaxy profiles of cosmic voids? In this paper we use
two methods to extract voids in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 redMaGiC
galaxy sample to address this question. We use either 2D slices in projection,
or the 3D distribution of galaxies based on photometric redshifts to identify
voids. For the mass profile, we measure the tangential shear profiles of
background galaxies to infer the excess surface mass density. The
signal-to-noise ratio for our lensing measurement ranges between 10.7 and 14.0
for the two void samples. We infer their 3D density profiles by fitting models
based on N-body simulations and find good agreement for void radii in the range
15-85 Mpc. Comparison with their galaxy profiles then allows us to test the
relation between mass and light at the 10%-level, the most stringent test to
date. We find very similar shapes for the two profiles, consistent with a
linear relationship between mass and light both within and outside the void
radius. We validate our analysis with the help of simulated mock catalogues and
estimate the impact of photometric redshift uncertainties on the measurement.
Our methodology can be used for cosmological applications, including tests of
gravity with voids. This is especially promising when the lensing profiles are
combined with spectroscopic measurements of void dynamics via redshift-space
distortions.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.04507 [pdf] - 1996797
Probing the galaxy-halo connection with total satellite luminosity
Submitted: 2019-11-11
We demonstrate how the total luminosity in satellite galaxies is a powerful
probe of dark matter halos around central galaxies. The method cross-correlates
central galaxies in spectroscopic galaxy samples with fainter galaxies detected
in photometric surveys. After background subtraction, the excess galaxies
around the central galaxies represent faint satellite galaxies within the dark
matter halo. Using abundance matching models, we show that the the total galaxy
luminosity, L_sat, scales linearly with host halo mass, making L_sat an
excellent proxy for M_h. L_sat is also sensitive to the formation time of the
halo, as younger halos have more substructure at fixed M_h. We demonstrate that
probes of galaxy large-scale environment can break this degeneracy. Although
this is an indirect probe of the halo, it can yield a high-S/N measurement for
galaxies expected to occupy halos at $<10^{12}$ M_sol, where other methods
suffer from larger errors. In this paper we focus on observational and
theoretical systematics in the L_sat method. We test the robustness of our
method of finding central galaxies and our methods of estimating the number of
background galaxies. We implement this method on central galaxies in SDSS data,
with satellites identified in faint imaging from the DESI Legacy Imaging
Surveys. We find excellent agreement between our theoretical predictions and
the observational measurements. Finally, we compare our L_sat measurements to
weak lensing estimates of M_h for red and blue subsamples. In the stellar mass
range where the measurements overlap, we find consistent results, where red
galaxies live in larger halos. However, the L_sat approach allows us to probe
significantly lower mass galaxies. At these masses, the L_sat values are
equivalent. This example shows the potential of L_sat as a probe of dark halos.
(Abridged)
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02499 [pdf] - 1995367
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological
Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kim, A. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, S.;
Lemos, P.;
Leonard, C. D.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Raveri, M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04, last modified: 2019-11-08
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models
dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a
combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the
first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external
data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated
scenarios: 1) nonzero curvature $\Omega_k$, 2) number of relativistic species
$N_{\rm eff}$ different from the standard value of 3.046, 3) time-varying
equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$
(alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, $w_p$, and $w_a$),
and 4) modified gravity described by the parameters $\mu_0$ and $\Sigma_0$ that
modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck
CMB measurements; BAO measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; RSD measurements
from BOSS; and SNIa information from the Pantheon compilation. Constraints on
curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external
data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find
$\Omega_k=0.0020^{+0.0037}_{-0.0032}$ at the 68% confidence level, and $N_{\rm
eff}<3.28\, (3.55)$ at 68% (95%) confidence. For the time-varying
equation-of-state, we find the pivot value $(w_p, w_a)=(-0.91^{+0.19}_{-0.23},
-0.57^{+0.93}_{-1.11})$ at pivot redshift $z_p=0.27$ from DES alone, and $(w_p,
w_a)=(-1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.04}, -0.28^{+0.37}_{-0.48})$ at $z_p=0.20$ from DES Y1
combined with external data; in either case we find no evidence for the
temporal variation of the equation of state. For modified gravity, we find the
present-day value of the relevant parameters to be $\Sigma_0=
0.43^{+0.28}_{-0.29}$ from DES Y1 alone, and $(\Sigma_0,
\mu_0)=(0.06^{+0.08}_{-0.07}, -0.11^{+0.42}_{-0.46})$ from DES Y1 combined with
external data, consistent with predictions from GR.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.05005 [pdf] - 1938344
Phenotypic redshifts with self-organizing maps: A novel method to
characterize redshift distributions of source galaxies for weak lensing
Buchs, R.;
Davis, C.;
Gruen, D.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Sánchez, C.;
Myles, J.;
Roodman, A.;
Allen, S.;
Amon, A.;
Choi, A.;
Masters, D. C.;
Miquel, R.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruend, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.
Submitted: 2019-01-15, last modified: 2019-08-05
Wide-field imaging surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) rely on
coarse measurements of spectral energy distributions in a few filters to
estimate the redshift distribution of source galaxies. In this regime, sample
variance, shot noise, and selection effects limit the attainable accuracy of
redshift calibration and thus of cosmological constraints. We present a new
method to combine wide-field, few-filter measurements with catalogs from deep
fields with additional filters and sufficiently low photometric noise to break
degeneracies in photometric redshifts. The multi-band deep field is used as an
intermediary between wide-field observations and accurate redshifts, greatly
reducing sample variance, shot noise, and selection effects. Our implementation
of the method uses self-organizing maps to group galaxies into phenotypes based
on their observed fluxes, and is tested using a mock DES catalog created from
N-body simulations. It yields a typical uncertainty on the mean redshift in
each of five tomographic bins for an idealized simulation of the DES Year 3
weak-lensing tomographic analysis of $\sigma_{\Delta z} = 0.007$, which is a
60% improvement compared to the Year 1 analysis. Although the implementation of
the method is tailored to DES, its formalism can be applied to other large
photometric surveys with a similar observing strategy.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.13167 [pdf] - 1926518
The Aemulus Project IV: Emulating Halo Bias
Submitted: 2019-07-30
Models of the spatial distribution of dark matter halos must achieve new
levels of precision and accuracy in order to satisfy the requirements of
upcoming experiments. In this work, we present a halo bias emulator for
modeling the clustering of halos on large scales. It incorporates the
cosmological dependence of the bias beyond the mapping of halo mass to peak
height. The emulator makes substantial improvements in accuracy compared to the
widely used Tinker et al. (2010) model. Halos in this work are defined using an
overdensity criteria of 200 relative to the mean background density. Halo
catalogs are produced for 40 N-body simulations as part of the Aemulus project
at snapshots from z=3 to z=0. The emulator is trained over the mass range
$6\times10^{12}-7\times10^{15}\ h^{-1}M_{\odot}$. Using an additional suite of
35 simulations, we determine that the precision of the emulator is redshift
dependent, achieving sub-percent levels for a majority of the redshift range.
Two additional simulation suites are used to test the ability of the emulator
to extrapolate to higher and lower masses. Our high-resolution simulation suite
is used to develop an extrapolation scheme in which the emulator asymptotes to
the Tinker et al. (2010) model at low mass, achieving ~3% accuracy down to
$10^{11}\ h^{-1}M_{\odot}$. Finally, we present a method to propagate emulator
modeling uncertainty into an error budget. Our emulator is made publicly
available at \url{https://github.com/AemulusProject/bias_emulator}.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.06530 [pdf] - 2025623
CosmoDC2: A Synthetic Sky Catalog for Dark Energy Science with LSST
Korytov, Danila;
Hearin, Andrew;
Kovacs, Eve;
Larsen, Patricia;
Rangel, Esteban;
Hollowed, Joseph;
Benson, Andrew J.;
Heitmann, Katrin;
Mao, Yao-Yuan;
Bahmanyar, Anita;
Chang, Chihway;
Campbell, Duncan;
Derose, Joseph;
Finkel, Hal;
Frontiere, Nicholas;
Gawiser, Eric;
Habib, Salman;
Joachimi, Benjamin;
Lanusse, François;
Li, Nan;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Morrison, Christopher;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Pope, Adrian;
Rykoff, Eli;
Simet, Melanie;
To, Chun-Hao;
Vikraman, Vinu;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
White, Martin
Submitted: 2019-07-15, last modified: 2019-07-27
This paper introduces cosmoDC2, a large synthetic galaxy catalog designed to
support precision dark energy science with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
(LSST). CosmoDC2 is the starting point for the second data challenge (DC2)
carried out by the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (LSST DESC). The
catalog is based on a trillion-particle, 4.225 Gpc^3 box cosmological N-body
simulation, the `Outer Rim' run. It covers 440 deg^2 of sky area to a redshift
of z=3 and is complete to a magnitude depth of 28 in the r-band. Each galaxy is
characterized by a multitude of properties including stellar mass, morphology,
spectral energy distributions, broadband filter magnitudes, host halo
information and weak lensing shear. The size and complexity of cosmoDC2
requires an efficient catalog generation methodology; our approach is based on
a new hybrid technique that combines data-driven empirical approaches with
semi-analytic galaxy modeling. A wide range of observation-based validation
tests has been implemented to ensure that cosmoDC2 enables the science goals of
the planned LSST DESC DC2 analyses. This paper also represents the official
release of the cosmoDC2 data set, including an efficient reader that
facilitates interaction with the data.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.03035 [pdf] - 2068898
The Impact of the Fiducial Cosmology Assumption on BAO Cosmological
Parameter Inference
Submitted: 2019-06-07
Standard analysis pipelines for measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
(BAO) in galaxy surveys make use of a fiducial cosmological model to guide the
data compression required to transform from observed redshifts and angles to
the measured angular and radial BAO peak positions. In order to remove any
dependence on the fiducial cosmology from the results, all models compared to
the data should mimic the compression and its dependence on the fiducial model.
In practice, approximations are made when testing models: (1) There is assumed
to be no residual dependence on the fiducial cosmology after reconstruction,
(2) differences in the distance--redshift relationship are assumed to match a
linear scaling, and (3) differences in clustering between true and fiducial
models are assumed to be removed by the free parameters used to null the
non-BAO signal. We test these approximations using the current standard
measurement procedure with a set of halo catalogs from the {\sc Aemulus} suite
of $N$-body simulations, which span a range of $w\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmological
models. We focus on reconstruction of the primordial BAO and locating the BAO.
For the range of $w\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmologies covered by the {\sc Aemulus}
suite, we find no evidence for systematic errors in the measured BAO shift
parameters $\alpha_{\parallel}$ and $\alpha_{\bot}$ to $< 0.1\%$. However, the
measured errors $\sigma_{\alpha_{\parallel}}$ and $\sigma_{\alpha_{\bot}}$ show
a notable absolute increase by up to $+0.001$ and $+0.002$ respectively in the
case that the fiducial cosmology does not match the truth. These effects on the
inferred BAO scale will be important given the precision of measurements
expected from future surveys including DESI, Euclid, and WFIRST.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.06081 [pdf] - 1888814
Measurement of the Splashback Feature around SZ-selected Galaxy Clusters
with DES, SPT and ACT
Shin, T.;
Adhikari, S.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Chang, C.;
Jain, B.;
Battaglia, N.;
Bleem, L.;
Bocquet, S.;
DeRose, J.;
Gruen, D.;
Hilton, M.;
Kravtsov, A.;
McClintock, T.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Varga, T. N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Wu, H.;
Aiola, S.;
Allam, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bond, J. R.;
Brodwin, M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Choi, S. K.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Crawford, T. M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Devlin, M. J.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Dunkley, J.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gallardo, P. A.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gralla, M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, N.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hill, J. C.;
Ho, S. P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huffenberger, K.;
Hughes, J. P.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kim, A. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Madhavacheril, M. S.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Maurin, L.;
McMahon, J.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Naess, S.;
Nati, F.;
Newburgh, L.;
Niemack, M. D.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Partridge, L. A. Page B.;
Patil, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rapetti, D.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Serrano, S.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staggs, S. T.;
Stark, A.;
Stein, G.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
van Engelen, A.;
Wollack, E. J.;
Xu, Z.;
Zhang, Z.
Submitted: 2018-11-14, last modified: 2019-05-24
We present a detection of the splashback feature around galaxy clusters
selected using their Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) signal. Recent measurements of the
splashback feature around optically selected galaxy clusters have found that
the splashback radius, $r_{\rm sp}$, is smaller than predicted by N-body
simulations. A possible explanation for this discrepancy is that $r_{\rm sp}$
inferred from the observed radial distribution of galaxies is affected by
selection effects related to the optical cluster-finding algorithms. We test
this possibility by measuring the splashback feature in clusters selected via
the SZ effect in data from the South Pole Telescope SZ survey and the Atacama
Cosmology Telescope Polarimeter survey. The measurement is accomplished by
correlating these clusters with galaxies detected in the Dark Energy Survey
Year 3 data. The SZ observable used to select clusters in this analysis is
expected to have a tighter correlation with halo mass and to be more immune to
projection effects and aperture-induced biases than optically selected
clusters. We find that the measured $r_{\rm sp}$ for SZ-selected clusters is
consistent with the expectations from simulations, although the small number of
SZ-selected clusters makes a precise comparison difficult. In agreement with
previous work, when using optically selected redMaPPer clusters, $r_{\rm sp}$
is $\sim$ $2\sigma$ smaller than in the simulations. These results motivate
detailed investigations of selection biases in optically selected cluster
catalogs and exploration of the splashback feature around larger samples of
SZ-selected clusters. Additionally, we investigate trends in the galaxy profile
and splashback feature as a function of galaxy color, finding that blue
galaxies have profiles close to a power law with no discernible splashback
feature, which is consistent with them being on their first infall into the
cluster.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02111 [pdf] - 1882453
UNIT project: Universe $N$-body simulations for the Investigation of
Theoretical models from galaxy surveys
Chuang, Chia-Hsun;
Yepes, Gustavo;
Kitaura, Francisco-Shu;
Pellejero-Ibanez, Marcos;
Rodriguez-Torres, Sergio;
Feng, Yu;
Metcalf, R. Benton;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Zhao, Cheng;
To, Chun-Hao;
Alam, Shadab;
Banerjee, Arka;
DeRose, Joseph;
Giocoli, Carlo;
Knebe, Alexander;
Reyes, Guillermo
Submitted: 2018-11-05, last modified: 2019-05-08
We present the UNIT $N$-body cosmological simulations project, designed to
provide precise predictions for nonlinear statistics of the galaxy
distribution. We focus on characterizing statistics relevant to emission line
and luminous red galaxies in the current and upcoming generation of galaxy
surveys. We use a suite of precise particle mesh simulations (FastPM) as well
as with full $N$-body calculations with a mass resolution of $\sim
1.2\times10^9\,h^{-1}$M$_{\odot}$ to investigate the recently suggested
technique of Angulo & Pontzen 2016 to suppress the variance of cosmological
simulations We study redshift space distortions, cosmic voids, higher order
statistics from $z=2$ down to $z=0$. We find that both two- and three-point
statistics are unbiased. Over the scales of interest for baryon acoustic
oscillations and redshift-space distortions, we find that the variance is
greatly reduced in the two-point statistics and in the cross correlation
between halos and cosmic voids, but is not reduced significantly for the
three-point statistics. We demonstrate that the accuracy of the two-point
correlation function for a galaxy survey with effective volume of 20
($h^{-1}$Gpc)$^3$ is improved by about a factor of 40, indicating that two
pairs of simulations with a volume of 1 ($h^{-1}$Gpc)$^3$ lead to the
equivalent variance of $\sim$150 such simulations. The $N$-body simulations
presented here thus provide an effective survey volume of about seven times the
effective survey volume of DESI or Euclid. The data from this project,
including dark matter fields, halo catalogues, and their clustering statistics,
are publicly available at http://www.unitsims.org.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02375 [pdf] - 1877871
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Banik, N.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Camacho, H.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Chan, K. C.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lemos, P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-06
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a
powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark
energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed
Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak
gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results
from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark
energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other
experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the
probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark
energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be
consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the
baryon density of $\Omega_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of
early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of
large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude
advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the
next decade.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.13347 [pdf] - 1966740
Constraints on the redshift evolution of astrophysical feedback with
Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect cross-correlations
Pandey, S.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Xu, Z.;
Orlowski-Scherer, J.;
Zhu, N.;
Lidz, A.;
Aguirre, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Devlin, M.;
Hill, J. C.;
Jain, B.;
Sheth, R. K.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2019-04-30
An understanding of astrophysical feedback is important for constraining
models of galaxy formation and for extracting cosmological information from
current and future weak lensing surveys. The thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect,
quantified via the Compton-$y$ parameter, is a powerful tool for studying
feedback, because it directly probes the pressure of the hot, ionized gas
residing in dark matter halos. Cross-correlations between galaxies and maps of
Compton-$y$ obtained from cosmic microwave background surveys are sensitive to
the redshift evolution of the gas pressure, and its dependence on halo mass. In
this work, we use galaxies identified in year one data from the Dark Energy
Survey and Compton-$y$ maps constructed from Planck observations. We find
highly significant (roughly $12\sigma$) detections of galaxy-$y$
cross-correlation in multiple redshift bins. By jointly fitting these
measurements as well as measurements of galaxy clustering, we constrain the
halo bias-weighted, gas pressure of the Universe as a function of redshift
between $0.15 \lesssim z \lesssim 0.75$. We compare these measurements to
predictions from hydrodynamical simulations, allowing us to constrain the
amount of thermal energy in the halo gas relative to that resulting from
gravitational collapse.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.08061 [pdf] - 1828815
Effects of NII and H$\alpha$ Line Blending on the WFIRST Galaxy Redshift
Survey
Submitted: 2018-04-21, last modified: 2019-02-07
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) will conduct a galaxy
redshift survey using the H$\alpha$ emission line primarily for spectroscopic
redshift determination. Due to the modest spectroscopic resolution of the
grism, the H$\alpha$ and the neighboring [NII] lines are blended, leading to a
redshift bias that depends on the [NII]/H$\alpha$ ratio, which is correlated
with a galaxy's metallicity, hence mass and ultimately environment. We
investigate how this bias propagates into the galaxy clustering and
cosmological parameters obtained from the WFIRST. Using simulation, we explore
the effect of line blending on redshift-space distortion and baryon acoustic
oscillation (BAO) measurements. We measure the BAO parameters
$\alpha_{\parallel}$, $\alpha_{\perp}$, the logarithmic growth factor $f_{v}$,
and calculate their errors based on the correlations between the line ratio and
large-scale structure. We find $\Delta\alpha_{\parallel} = 0.31 \pm 0.23 \%$
($0.26\pm0.17\%$), $\Delta\alpha_{\perp} = -0.10\pm0.10\%$ ($-0.12 \pm 0.11
\%$), and $\Delta f_{v} = 0.17\pm0.33\%$ ($-0.20 \pm 0.30\%$) for redshift
1.355--1.994 (0.700--1.345), which use approximately 18$\%$, 9$\%$, and 7$\%$
of the systematic error budget in a root-sum-square sense. These errors may
already be tolerable but further mitigations are discussed. Biases due to the
environment-independent redshift error can be mitigated by measuring the
redshift error probability distribution function. High-spectral-resolution
re-observation of a few thousand galaxies would be required (if by direct
approach) to reduce them to below 25$\%$ of the error budget. Finally, we
outline the next steps to improve the modeling of [NII]-induced blending biases
and their interaction with other redshift error sources.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.02401 [pdf] - 1811355
The Buzzard Flock: Dark Energy Survey Synthetic Sky Catalogs
DeRose, Joseph;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Becker, Matthew R.;
Busha, Michael T.;
Rykoff, Eli S.;
MacCrann, Niall;
Erickson, Brandon;
Evrard, August E.;
Kravtsov, Andrey;
Gruen, Daniel;
Allam, Sahar;
Avila, Santiago;
Bridle, Sarah;
Brooks, David;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Carretero, Jorge;
Castander, Francisco J.;
Cawthon, Ross;
Crocce, Martin;
da Costa, Luiz N.;
Davis, Christopher;
De Vicente, Juan;
Dietrich, Jörg P.;
Doel, Peter;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Garcia-Bellido, Juan;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Hartley, Will G.;
Hollowood, Devon L.;
Hoyle, Ben;
James, David J.;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Kuropatkin, Nikolay;
Lima, Marcos;
Maia, Marcio A. G.;
Menanteau, Felipe;
Miller, Christopher J.;
Miquel, Ramon;
Ogando, Ricardo L. C.;
Malagón, Andrés Plazas;
Romer, A. Kathy;
Sanchez, Eusebio;
Schindler, Rafe;
Serrano, Santiago;
Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignacio;
Smith, Mathew;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly E. C.;
Tarle, Gregory;
Vikram, Vinu
Submitted: 2019-01-08
We present a suite of 18 synthetic sky catalogs designed to support science
analysis of galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data. For each
catalog, we use a computationally efficient empirical approach, ADDGALS, to
embed galaxies within light-cone outputs of three dark matter simulations that
resolve halos with masses above ~5x10^12 h^-1 m_sun at z <= 0.32 and 10^13 h^-1
m_sun at z~2. The embedding method is tuned to match the observed evolution of
galaxy counts at different luminosities as well as the spatial clustering of
the galaxy population. Galaxies are lensed by matter along the line of sight
--- including magnification, shear, and multiple images --- using CALCLENS, an
algorithm that calculates shear with 0.42 arcmin resolution at galaxy positions
in the full catalog. The catalogs presented here, each with the same LCDM
cosmology (denoted Buzzard), contain on average 820 million galaxies over an
area of 1120 square degrees with positions, magnitudes, shapes, photometric
errors, and photometric redshift estimates. We show that the weak-lensing shear
catalog, redMaGiC galaxy catalogs and redMaPPer cluster catalogs provide
plausible realizations of the same catalogs in the DES Y1 data by comparing
their magnitude, color and redshift distributions, angular clustering, and
mass-observable relations, making them useful for testing analyses that use
these samples. We make public the galaxy samples appropriate for the DES Y1
data, as well as the data vectors used for cosmology analyses on these
simulations.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.05116 [pdf] - 1938330
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Validation of weak lensing cluster
member contamination estimates from P(z) decomposition
Varga, T. N.;
DeRose, J.;
Gruen, D.;
McClintock, T.;
Seitz, S.;
Rozo, E.;
Costanzi, M.;
Hoyle, B.;
MacCrann, N.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Simet, M.;
von der Linden, A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2018-12-12
Weak lensing source galaxy catalogs used in estimating the masses of galaxy
clusters can be heavily contaminated by cluster members, prohibiting accurate
mass calibration. In this study we test the performance of an estimator for the
extent of cluster member contamination based on decomposing the photometric
redshift $P(z)$ of source galaxies into contaminating and background
components. We perform a full scale mock analysis on a simulated sky survey
approximately mirroring the observational properties of the Dark Energy Survey
Year One observations (DES Y1), and find excellent agreement between the true
number profile of contaminating cluster member galaxies in the simulation and
the estimated one. We further apply the method to estimate the cluster member
contamination for the DES Y1 redMaPPer cluster mass calibration analysis, and
compare the results to an alternative approach based on the angular correlation
of weak lensing source galaxies. We find indications that the correlation based
estimates are biased by the selection of the weak lensing sources in the
cluster vicinity, which does not strongly impact the $P(z)$ decomposition
method. Collectively, these benchmarks demonstrate the strength of the $P(z)$
decomposition method in alleviating membership contamination and enabling
highly accurate cluster weak lensing studies without broad exclusion of source
galaxies, thereby improving the total constraining power of cluster mass
calibration via weak lensing.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.09795 [pdf] - 1785791
DES Y1 Results: Validating cosmological parameter estimation using
simulated Dark Energy Surveys
MacCrann, N.;
DeRose, J.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Blazek, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Crocce, M.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Jain, B.;
Krause, E.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Gruen, D.;
Zuntz, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Prat, J.;
Wang, M.;
Dodelson, S.;
Kravtsov, A.;
Fosalba, P.;
Busha, M. T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Huterer, D.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-03-26, last modified: 2018-11-14
We use mock galaxy survey simulations designed to resemble the Dark Energy
Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data to validate and inform cosmological parameter
estimation. When similar analysis tools are applied to both simulations and
real survey data, they provide powerful validation tests of the DES Y1
cosmological analyses presented in companion papers. We use two suites of
galaxy simulations produced using different methods, which therefore provide
independent tests of our cosmological parameter inference. The cosmological
analysis we aim to validate is presented in DES Collaboration et al. (2017) and
uses angular two-point correlation functions of galaxy number counts and weak
lensing shear, as well as their cross-correlation, in multiple redshift bins.
While our constraints depend on the specific set of simulated realisations
available, for both suites of simulations we find that the input cosmology is
consistent with the combined constraints from multiple simulated DES Y1
realizations in the $\Omega_m-\sigma_8$ plane. For one of the suites, we are
able to show with high confidence that any biases in the inferred
$S_8=\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}$ and $\Omega_m$ are smaller than the DES Y1
$1-\sigma$ uncertainties. For the other suite, for which we have fewer
realizations, we are unable to be this conclusive; we infer a roughly 70%
probability that systematic biases in the recovered $\Omega_m$ and $S_8$ are
sub-dominant to the DES Y1 uncertainty. As cosmological analyses of this kind
become increasingly more precise, validation of parameter inference using
survey simulations will be essential to demonstrate robustness.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.09456 [pdf] - 1996667
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methods for Cluster Cosmology and
Application to the SDSS
Costanzi, M.;
Rozo, E.;
Simet, M.;
Zhang, Y.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Mantz, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Jeltema, T.;
Gruen, D.;
McClintock, S. Allen T.;
Romer, A. K.;
von der Linden, A.;
Farahi, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Varga, T. N.;
Weller, J.;
Giles, P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Bhargava, S.;
Bermeo-Hernandez, A.;
Chen, X.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2018-10-22
We perform the first blind analysis of cluster abundance data. Specifically,
we derive cosmological constraints from the abundance and weak-lensing signal
of \redmapper\ clusters of richness $\lambda\geq 20$ in the redshift range
$z\in[0.1,0.3]$ as measured in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We
simultaneously fit for cosmological parameters and the richness--mass relation
of the clusters. For a flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model with massive
neutrinos, we find $S_8 \equiv
\sigma_{8}(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}=0.79^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$. This value is both
consistent and competitive with that derived from cluster catalogues selected
in different wavelengths. Our result is also consistent with the combined
probes analyses by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Kilo-Degree Survey
(KiDS), and with the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies as measured
by \planck. We demonstrate that the cosmological posteriors are robust against
variation of the richness--mass relation model and to systematics associated
with the calibration of the selection function. In combination with Baryon
Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) data, we
constrain the Hubble rate to be $h=0.66\pm 0.02$, independent of the CMB.
Future work aimed at improving our understanding of the scatter of the
richness--mass relation has the potential to significantly improve the
precision of our cosmological posteriors. The methods described in this work
were developed for use in the forthcoming analysis of cluster abundances in the
DES. Our SDSS analysis constitutes the first part of a staged-unblinding
analysis of the full DES data set.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02322 [pdf] - 1924924
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering,
Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Baxter, E. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Bianchini, F.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleem, L.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
de Haan, T.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Everett, W. B.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
George, E. M.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hou, Z.;
Hoyle, B.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Knox, L.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Luong-Van, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Miquel, R.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Muir, J.;
Natoli, T.;
Nicola, A.;
Nord, B.;
Omori, Y.;
Padin, S.;
Pandey, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pryke, C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sayre, J. T.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Simard, G.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Yanny, B.;
Zahn, O.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three
cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field,
and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These
three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical
imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and
millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from
the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy
density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between
these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological
models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation
functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum)
yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =
0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test
for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the
Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no
evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models.
Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields
$S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$.
These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the
first year DES joint-probes analysis.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.02441 [pdf] - 1945701
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between DES Y1
galaxy weak lensing and SPT+Planck CMB weak lensing
Omori, Y.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Kirk, D.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bleem, L. E.;
Cawthon, R.;
Choi, A.;
Chown, R.;
Crawford, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Holder, G. P.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Krause, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Miquel, R.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Reichardt, C. L.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sheldon, E.;
Simard, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Aylor, K.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carlstrom, J. E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C. L.;
Cho, H-M.;
Crites, A. T.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
de Haan, T.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dobbs, M. A.;
Everett, W. B.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
George, E. M.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Halverson, N. W.;
Harrington, N. L.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Holzapfel, W. L.;
Hou, Z.;
Hrubes, J. D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Lee, A. T.;
Leitch, E. M.;
Luong-Van, D.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manzotti, A.;
Marrone, D. P.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, J. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Meyer, S. S.;
Mocanu, L. M.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Natoli, T.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Padin, S.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pryke, C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Ruhl, J. E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schaffer, K. K.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Shirokoff, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Staniszewski, Z.;
Stark, A. A.;
Story, K. T.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vanderlinde, K.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Williamson, R.;
Wu, W. L. K.;
Zahn, O.
Submitted: 2018-10-04
We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) year-one (Y1) data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak
lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data, with an
effective overlapping area of 1289 deg$^{2}$. With the combined measurements
from four source galaxy redshift bins, we reject the hypothesis of no lensing
with a significance of $10.8\sigma$. When employing angular scale cuts, this
significance is reduced to $6.8\sigma$, which remains the highest
signal-to-noise measurement of its kind to date. We fit the amplitude of the
correlation functions while fixing the cosmological parameters to a fiducial
$\Lambda$CDM model, finding $A = 0.99 \pm 0.17$. We additionally use the
correlation function measurements to constrain shear calibration bias,
obtaining constraints that are consistent with previous DES analyses. Finally,
when performing a cosmological analysis under the $\Lambda$CDM model, we obtain
the marginalized constraints of $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.261^{+0.070}_{-0.051}$ and
$S_{8}\equiv \sigma_{8}\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.660^{+0.085}_{-0.100}$.
These measurements are used in a companion work that presents cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of two-point functions among galaxies,
galaxy shears, and CMB lensing using DES, SPT and Planck data.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.07298 [pdf] - 1760974
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of redMaGiC Redshift
Distributions in DES and SDSS from Cross-Correlations
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rozo, E.;
Frieman, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-12-19, last modified: 2018-10-03
We present calibrations of the redshift distributions of redMaGiC galaxies in
the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR8
data. These results determine the priors of the redshift distribution of
redMaGiC galaxies, which were used for galaxy clustering measurements and as
lenses for galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements in DES Y1 cosmological analyses.
We empirically determine the bias in redMaGiC photometric redshift estimates
using angular cross-correlations with Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
(BOSS) galaxies. For DES, we calibrate a single parameter redshift bias in
three photometric redshift bins: $z \in[0.15,0.3]$, [0.3,0.45], and [0.45,0.6].
Our best fit results in each bin give photometric redshift biases of $|\Delta
z|<0.01$. To further test the redMaGiC algorithm, we apply our calibration
procedure to SDSS redMaGiC galaxies, where the statistical precision of the
cross-correlation measurement is much higher due to a greater overlap with BOSS
galaxies. For SDSS, we also find best fit results of $|\Delta z|<0.01$. We
compare our results to other analyses of redMaGiC photometric redshifts.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00039 [pdf] - 1767415
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of
redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Shin, T.;
Melchior, P.;
DeRose, J.;
Seitz, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Sheldon, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
von der Linden, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Mantz, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Allen, S.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bermeo, A.;
Bhargava, S.;
Costanzi, M.;
Everett, S.;
Farahi, A.;
Hamaus, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Hoyle, B.;
Israel, H.;
Li, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Morris, G.;
Palmese, A.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Pollina, G.;
Rau, M. M.;
Simet, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Cervantes, C. Vergara;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-30, last modified: 2018-09-12
We constrain the mass--richness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}|\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=-0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semi-analytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halo--mass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.10663 [pdf] - 1728965
Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear
measurements
Troxel, M. A.;
Krause, E.;
Chang, C.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
MacCrann, N.;
Chen, A.;
Davis, C.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gatti, M.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Prat, J.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kirk, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.
Submitted: 2018-04-27, last modified: 2018-07-31
We explore the impact of an update to the typical approximation for the shape
noise term in the analytic covariance matrix for cosmic shear experiments that
assumes the absence of survey boundary and mask effects. We present an exact
expression for the number of galaxy pairs in this term based on the the survey
mask, which leads to more than a factor of three increase in the shape noise on
the largest measured scales for the Kilo-Degree Survey (KIDS-450) real-space
cosmic shear data. We compare the result of this analytic expression to several
alternative methods for measuring the shape noise from the data and find
excellent agreement. This update to the covariance resolves any internal model
tension evidenced by the previously large cosmological best-fit $\chi^2$ for
the KiDS-450 cosmic shear data. The best-fit $\chi^2$ is reduced from 161 to
121 for 118 degrees of freedom. We also apply a correction to how the
multiplicative shear calibration uncertainty is included in the covariance.
This change, along with a previously known update to the reported effective
angular values of the data vector, jointly shift the inferred amplitude of the
correlation function to higher values. We find that this improves agreement of
the KiDS-450 cosmic shear results with Dark Energy Survey Year 1 and Planck
results.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05045 [pdf] - 1722433
Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and
lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data
Gruen, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Krause, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Chang, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hilbert, S.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Prat, J.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-10-13, last modified: 2018-07-24
We derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function
(PDF) of evolved large-scale matter density fluctuations. We do this by
splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies,
and by measuring both gravitational shear around and counts-in-cells in
overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year
and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation
theory model (see companion paper Friedrich at al.) and is validated using
N-body simulation realizations and log-normal mocks. It allows us to constrain
cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies w.r.t. matter density and, in
addition, the skewness of the matter density field.
From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a
connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson
fluctuations on <=20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity
models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density
$\Omega_m=0.26^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $\Omega_m=0.28^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ that are
consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of
galaxy and shear two-point functions (3x2pt) that only uses second moments of
the PDF. Constraints on $\sigma_8$ are model dependent
($\sigma_8=0.97^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ and $0.80^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$ for the two
stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3x2pt
results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range.
As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to
compare the skewness $S_3$ of the matter density PDF to its LCDM prediction. We
find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than
25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.07072 [pdf] - 1767527
Modeling projection effects in optically-selected cluster catalogues
Costanzi, M.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Farahi, A.;
Jeltema, T.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Mantz, A.;
Gruen, D.;
Mandelbaum, R.;
DeRose, J.;
McClintock, T.;
Varga, T. N.;
Zhang, Y.;
Weller, J.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Aguena, M.
Submitted: 2018-07-18
The cosmological utility of galaxy cluster catalogues is primarily limited by
our ability to calibrate the relation between halo mass and observable mass
proxies such as cluster richness, X-ray luminosity or the Sunyaev-Zeldovich
signal. Projection effects are a particularly pernicious systematic effect that
can impact observable mass proxies; structure along the line of sight can both
bias and increase the scatter of the observable mass proxies used in cluster
abundance studies. In this work, we develop an empirical method to characterize
the impact of projection effects on redMaPPer cluster catalogues. We use
numerical simulations to validate our method and illustrate its robustness. We
demonstrate that modeling of projection effects is a necessary component for
cluster abundance studies capable of reaching $\approx 5\%$ mass calibration
uncertainties (e.g. the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 sample). Specifically,
ignoring the impact of projection effects in the observable--mass relation ---
i.e. marginalizing over a log-normal model only --- biases the posterior of the
cluster normalization condition $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm
m}/0.3)^{1/2}$ by $\Delta S_8 =0.05$, more than twice the uncertainty in the
posterior for such an analysis.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.01391 [pdf] - 1945683
Hierarchical modeling and statistical calibration for photometric
redshifts
Submitted: 2018-07-03
The cosmological exploitation of modern photometric galaxy surveys requires
both accurate (unbiased) and precise (narrow) redshift probability
distributions derived from broadband photometry. Existing methodologies do not
meet those requirements. Standard template fitting delivers interpretable
models and errors, but lacks flexibility to learn inaccuracies in the observed
photometry or the spectral templates. Machine learning addresses those issues,
but requires representative training data, and the resulting models and
uncertainties cannot be interpreted in the context of a physical model or
outside of the training data. We present a hierarchical modeling approach
simultaneously addressing the issues of flexibility, interpretability, and
generalization. It combines template fitting with flexible (machine
learning-like) models to correct the spectral templates, model their redshift
distributions, and recalibrate the photometric observations. By optimizing the
full posterior distribution of the model and solving for its (thousands of)
parameters, one can perform a global statistical calibration of the data and
the SED model. We apply this approach to the public Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification data, and show that it provides more accurate and compact redshift
posterior distributions than existing methods, as well as insights into
residual photometric and SED systematics. The model is causal, makes
predictions for future data (e.g., additional photometric bandpasses), and its
internal parameters and components are interpretable. This approach does not
formally require the training data to be complete or representative; in
principle it can even work in regimes in which few or no spectroscopic
redshifts are available.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.00014 [pdf] - 1717179
Approximating photo-$z$ PDFs for large surveys
Submitted: 2018-05-31
Modern galaxy surveys produce redshift probability density functions (PDFs)
in addition to traditional photometric redshift (photo-$z$) point estimates.
However, the storage of photo-$z$ PDFs may present a challenge with
increasingly large catalogs, as we face a trade-off between the accuracy of
subsequent science measurements and the limitation of finite storage resources.
This paper presents $\texttt{qp}$, a Python package for manipulating
parametrizations of 1-dimensional PDFs, as suitable for photo-$z$ PDF
compression. We use $\texttt{qp}$ to investigate the performance of three
simple PDF storage formats (quantiles, samples, and step functions) as a
function of the number of stored parameters on two realistic mock datasets,
representative of upcoming surveys with different data qualities. We propose
some best practices for choosing a photo-$z$ PDF approximation scheme and
demonstrate the approach on a science case using performance metrics on both
ensembles of individual photo-$z$ PDFs and an estimator of the overall redshift
distribution function. We show that both the properties of the set of PDFs we
wish to approximate and the chosen fidelity metric(s) affect the optimal
parametrization. Additionally, we find that quantiles and samples outperform
step functions, and we encourage further consideration of these formats for PDF
approximation.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01532 [pdf] - 1681410
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Redshift distributions of the weak
lensing source galaxies
Hoyle, B.;
Gruen, D.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Rau, M. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Davis, C.;
Alarcon, A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Prat, J.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Davis, T. M.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Gatti, M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Mudd, D.;
Möller, A.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-05-11
We describe the derivation and validation of redshift distribution estimates
and their uncertainties for the galaxies used as weak lensing sources in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 cosmological analyses. The Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) code is used to assign galaxies to four redshift bins between
z=0.2 and 1.3, and to produce initial estimates of the lensing-weighted
redshift distributions $n^i_{PZ}(z)$ for bin i. Accurate determination of
cosmological parameters depends critically on knowledge of $n^i$ but is
insensitive to bin assignments or redshift errors for individual galaxies. The
cosmological analyses allow for shifts $n^i(z)=n^i_{PZ}(z-\Delta z^i)$ to
correct the mean redshift of $n^i(z)$ for biases in $n^i_{\rm PZ}$. The $\Delta
z^i$ are constrained by comparison of independently estimated 30-band
photometric redshifts of galaxies in the COSMOS field to BPZ estimates made
from the DES griz fluxes, for a sample matched in fluxes, pre-seeing size, and
lensing weight to the DES weak-lensing sources. In companion papers, the
$\Delta z^i$ are further constrained by the angular clustering of the source
galaxies around red galaxies with secure photometric redshifts at 0.15<z<0.9.
This paper details the BPZ and COSMOS procedures, and demonstrates that the
cosmological inference is insensitive to details of the $n^i(z)$ beyond the
choice of $\Delta z^i$. The clustering and COSMOS validation methods produce
consistent estimates of $\Delta z^i$, with combined uncertainties of
$\sigma_{\Delta z^i}=$0.015, 0.013, 0.011, and 0.022 in the four bins. We
marginalize over these in all analyses to follow, which does not diminish the
constraining power significantly. Repeating the photo-z procedure using the
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm instead of BPZ, or using the
$n^i(z)$ directly estimated from COSMOS, yields no discernible difference in
cosmological inferences.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01538 [pdf] - 1747812
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic
Shear
Troxel, M. A.;
MacCrann, N.;
Zuntz, J.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Krause, E.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Blazek, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Samuroff, S.;
Prat, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Davis, C.;
Ferté, A.;
DeRose, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Amara, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Choi, A.;
De Vicente, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Krawiec, C.;
Lahav, O.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Peacock, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Stebbins, A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2018-04-30
We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{-0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{-0.038}$ and a dark energy equation-of-state
$w=-0.95^{+0.33}_{-0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$ -- $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne -1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05162 [pdf] - 1716953
Density split statistics: joint model of counts and lensing in cells
Friedrich, O.;
Gruen, D.;
DeRose, J.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
McClintock, T.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Seitz, S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Chang, C.;
Hilbert, S.;
Jain, B.;
Kovacs, A.;
Lahav, O.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-14, last modified: 2018-04-24
We present density split statistics, a framework that studies lensing and
counts-in-cells as a function of foreground galaxy density, thereby providing a
large-scale measurement of both 2-point and 3-point statistics. Our method
extends our earlier work on trough lensing and is summarized as follows: given
a foreground (low redshift) population of galaxies, we divide the sky into
subareas of equal size but distinct galaxy density. We then measure lensing
around uniformly spaced points separately in each of these subareas, as well as
counts-in-cells statistics (CiC). The lensing signals trace the matter density
contrast around regions of fixed galaxy density. Through the CiC measurements
this can be related to the density profile around regions of fixed matter
density. Together, these measurements constitute a powerful probe of cosmology,
the skewness of the density field and the connection of galaxies and matter.
In this paper we show how to model both the density split lensing signal and
CiC from basic ingredients: a non-linear power spectrum, clustering hierarchy
coefficients from perturbation theory and a parametric model for galaxy bias
and shot-noise. Using N-body simulations, we demonstrate that this model is
sufficiently accurate for a cosmological analysis on year 1 data from the Dark
Energy Survey.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.05867 [pdf] - 1859846
The Aemulus Project III: Emulation of the Galaxy Correlation Function
Submitted: 2018-04-16, last modified: 2018-04-23
Using the N-body simulations of the AEMULUS Project, we construct an emulator
for the non-linear clustering of galaxies in real and redshift space. We
construct our model of galaxy bias using the halo occupation framework,
accounting for possible velocity bias. The model includes 15 parameters,
including both cosmological and galaxy bias parameters. We demonstrate that our
emulator achieves ~ 1% precision at the scales of interest, 0.1<r<10 h^{-1}
Mpc, and recovers the true cosmology when tested against independent
simulations. Our primary parameters of interest are related to the growth rate
of structure, f, and its degenerate combination fsigma_8. Using this emulator,
we show that the constraining power on these parameters monotonically increases
as smaller scales are included in the analysis, all the way down to 0.1 h^{-1}
Mpc. For a BOSS-like survey, the constraints on fsigma_8 from r<30 h^{-1} Mpc
scales alone are more than a factor of two tighter than those from the fiducial
BOSS analysis of redshift-space clustering using perturbation theory at larger
scales. The combination of real- and redshift-space clustering allows us to
break the degeneracy between f and sigma_8, yielding a 9% constraint on f alone
for a BOSS-like analysis. The current AEMULUS simulations limit this model to
surveys of massive galaxies. Future simulations will allow this framework to be
extended to all galaxy target types, including emission-line galaxies.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.05866 [pdf] - 1833982
The Aemulus Project II: Emulating the Halo Mass Function
Submitted: 2018-04-16
Existing models for the dependence of the halo mass function on cosmological
parameters will become a limiting source of systematic uncertainty for cluster
cosmology in the near future. We present a halo mass function emulator and
demonstrate improved accuracy relative to state-of-the-art analytic models. In
this work, mass is defined using an overdensity criteria of 200 relative to the
mean background density. Our emulator is constructed from the AEMULUS
simulations, a suite of 40 N-body simulations with snapshots from z=3 to z=0.
These simulations cover the flat wCDM parameter space allowed by recent Cosmic
Microwave Background, Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and Type Ia Supernovae
results, varying the parameters w, Omega_m, Omega_b, sigma_8, N_{eff}, n_s, and
H_0. We validate our emulator using five realizations of seven different
cosmologies, for a total of 35 test simulations. These test simulations were
not used in constructing the emulator, and were run with fully independent
initial conditions. We use our test simulations to characterize the modeling
uncertainty of the emulator, and introduce a novel way of marginalizing over
the associated systematic uncertainty. We confirm non-universality in our halo
mass function emulator as a function of both cosmological parameters and
redshift. Our emulator achieves better than 1% precision over much of the
relevant parameter space, and we demonstrate that the systematic uncertainty in
our emulator will remain a negligible source of error for cluster abundance
studies through at least the LSST Year 1 data set.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.05865 [pdf] - 1871383
The Aemulus Project I: Numerical Simulations for Precision Cosmology
Submitted: 2018-04-16
The rapidly growing statistical precision of galaxy surveys has lead to a
need for ever-more precise predictions of the observables used to constrain
cosmological and galaxy formation models. The primary avenue through which such
predictions will be obtained is suites of numerical simulations. These
simulations must span the relevant model parameter spaces, be large enough to
obtain the precision demanded by upcoming data, and be thoroughly validated in
order to ensure accuracy. In this paper we present one such suite of
simulations, forming the basis for the AEMULUS Project, a collaboration devoted
to precision emulation of galaxy survey observables. We have run a set of 75
(1.05 h^-1 Gpc)^3 simulations with mass resolution and force softening of
3.51\times 10^10 (Omega_m / 0.3) ~ h^-1 M_sun and 20 ~ h^-1 kpc respectively in
47 different wCDM cosmologies spanning the range of parameter space allowed by
the combination of recent Cosmic Microwave Background, Baryon Acoustic
Oscillation and Type Ia Supernovae results. We present convergence tests of
several observables including spherical overdensity halo mass functions, galaxy
projected correlation functions, galaxy clustering in redshift space, and
matter and halo correlation functions and power spectra. We show that these
statistics are converged to 1% (2%) for halos with more than 500 (200)
particles respectively and scales of r>200 ~ h^-1 kpc in real space or k ~ 3 h
Mpc^-1 in harmonic space for z\le 1. We find that the dominant source of
uncertainty comes from varying the particle loading of the simulations. This
leads to large systematic errors for statistics using halos with fewer than 200
particles and scales smaller than k ~ 4 h^-1 Mpc. We provide the halo catalogs
and snapshots detailed in this work to the community at
https://AemulusProject.github.io.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.09665 [pdf] - 1935438
DESCQA: An Automated Validation Framework for Synthetic Sky Catalogs
Mao, Yao-Yuan;
Kovacs, Eve;
Heitmann, Katrin;
Uram, Thomas D.;
Benson, Andrew J.;
Campbell, Duncan;
Cora, Sofía A.;
DeRose, Joseph;
Di Matteo, Tiziana;
Habib, Salman;
Hearin, Andrew P.;
Kalmbach, J. Bryce;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Lanusse, François;
Lukić, Zarija;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Padilla, Nelson;
Paillas, Enrique;
Pope, Adrian;
Ricker, Paul M.;
Ruiz, Andrés N.;
Tenneti, Ananth;
Vega-Martínez, Cristian;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Zhou, Rongpu;
Zu, Ying
Submitted: 2017-09-27, last modified: 2018-02-08
The use of high-quality simulated sky catalogs is essential for the success
of cosmological surveys. The catalogs have diverse applications, such as
investigating signatures of fundamental physics in cosmological observables,
understanding the effect of systematic uncertainties on measured signals and
testing mitigation strategies for reducing these uncertainties, aiding analysis
pipeline development and testing, and survey strategy optimization. The list of
applications is growing with improvements in the quality of the catalogs and
the details that they can provide. Given the importance of simulated catalogs,
it is critical to provide rigorous validation protocols that enable both
catalog providers and users to assess the quality of the catalogs in a
straightforward and comprehensive way. For this purpose, we have developed the
DESCQA framework for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Dark Energy Science
Collaboration as well as for the broader community. The goal of DESCQA is to
enable the inspection, validation, and comparison of an inhomogeneous set of
synthetic catalogs via the provision of a common interface within an automated
framework. In this paper, we present the design concept and first
implementation of DESCQA. In order to establish and demonstrate its full
functionality we use a set of interim catalogs and validation tests. We
highlight several important aspects, both technical and scientific, that
require thoughtful consideration when designing a validation framework,
including validation metrics and how these metrics impose requirements on the
synthetic sky catalogs.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01535 [pdf] - 1637501
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Curved-Sky Weak Lensing Mass Map
Chang, C.;
Pujol, A.;
Mawdsley, B.;
Bacon, D.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Melchior, P.;
Kovács, A.;
Jain, B.;
Leistedt, B.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Alarcon, A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Busha, M. T.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huff, E. M.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeffrey, N.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Prat, J.;
Rau, M. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Roodman, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2017-12-19
We construct the largest curved-sky galaxy weak lensing mass map to date from
the DES first-year (DES Y1) data. The map, about 10 times larger than previous
work, is constructed over a contiguous $\approx1,500 $deg$^2$, covering a
comoving volume of $\approx10 $Gpc$^3$. The effects of masking, sampling, and
noise are tested using simulations. We generate weak lensing maps from two DES
Y1 shear catalogs, Metacalibration and Im3shape, with sources at redshift
$0.2<z<1.3,$ and in each of four bins in this range. In the highest
signal-to-noise map, the ratio between the mean signal-to-noise in the E-mode
and the B-mode map is $\sim$1.5 ($\sim$2) when smoothed with a Gaussian filter
of $\sigma_{G}=30$ (80) arcminutes. The second and third moments of the
convergence $\kappa$ in the maps are in agreement with simulations. We also
find no significant correlation of $\kappa$ with maps of potential systematic
contaminants. Finally, we demonstrate two applications of the mass maps: (1)
cross-correlation with different foreground tracers of mass and (2) exploration
of the largest peaks and voids in the maps.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.02517 [pdf] - 1589408
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts in the
DES -- Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions
Davis, C.;
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rozo, E.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DeRose, J.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hoyle, B.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Rau, M. M.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-06
We present the calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) weak
lensing source galaxy redshift distributions from clustering measurements. By
cross-correlating the positions of source galaxies with luminous red galaxies
selected by the redMaGiC algorithm we measure the redshift distributions of the
source galaxies as placed into different tomographic bins. These measurements
constrain any such shifts to an accuracy of $\sim0.02$ and can be computed even
when the clustering measurements do not span the full redshift range. The
highest-redshift source bin is not constrained by the clustering measurements
because of the minimal redshift overlap with the redMaGiC galaxies. We compare
our constraints with those obtained from $\texttt{COSMOS}$ 30-band photometry
and find that our two very different methods produce consistent constraints.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00992 [pdf] - 1648618
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts - Methods
and Systematics Characterization
Gatti, M.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Davis, C.;
Cawthon, R.;
Rau, M. M.;
DeRose, J.;
De Vicente, J.;
Alarcon, A.;
Rozo, E.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Hoyle, B.;
Miquel, R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bonnett, C.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Roodman, A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Asorey, J.;
Davis, T. M.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Lewis, G.;
Lidman, C.;
Macaulay, E.;
Möller, A.;
O'Neill, C. R.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Yuan, F.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.
Submitted: 2017-09-04
We use numerical simulations to characterize the performance of a
clustering-based method to calibrate photometric redshift biases. In
particular, we cross-correlate the weak lensing (WL) source galaxies from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) sample with redMaGiC galaxies (luminous red
galaxies with secure photometric redshifts) to estimate the redshift
distribution of the former sample. The recovered redshift distributions are
used to calibrate the photometric redshift bias of standard photo-$z$ methods
applied to the same source galaxy sample. We apply the method to three
photo-$z$ codes run in our simulated data: Bayesian Photometric Redshift (BPZ),
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF), and Random Forest-based photo-$z$ (RF).
We characterize the systematic uncertainties of our calibration procedure, and
find that these systematic uncertainties dominate our error budget. The
dominant systematics are due to our assumption of unevolving bias and
clustering across each redshift bin, and to differences between the shapes of
the redshift distributions derived by clustering vs photo-$z$'s. The systematic
uncertainty in the mean redshift bias of the source galaxy sample is $\Delta z
\lesssim 0.02$, though the precise value depends on the redshift bin under
consideration. We discuss possible ways to mitigate the impact of our dominant
systematics in future analyses.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.09359 [pdf] - 1585253
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Multi-Probe Methodology and Simulated
Likelihood Analyses
Krause, E.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Zuntz, J.;
Friedrich, O.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Dodelson, S.;
Blazek, J.;
Secco, L. F.;
MacCrann, N.;
Baxter, E.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Crocce, M.;
DeRose, J.;
Ferte, A.;
Kokron, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Miranda, V.;
Omori, Y.;
Porredon, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Samuroff, S.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-06-28
We present the methodology for and detail the implementation of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) 3x2pt DES Year 1 (Y1) analysis, which combines
configuration-space two-point statistics from three different cosmological
probes: cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and galaxy clustering, using data
from the first year of DES observations. We have developed two independent
modeling pipelines and describe the code validation process. We derive
expressions for analytical real-space multi-probe covariances, and describe
their validation with numerical simulations. We stress-test the inference
pipelines in simulated likelihood analyses that vary 6-7 cosmology parameters
plus 20 nuisance parameters and precisely resemble the analysis to be presented
in the DES 3x2pt analysis paper, using a variety of simulated input data
vectors with varying assumptions.
We find that any disagreement between pipelines leads to changes in assigned
likelihood $\Delta \chi^2 \le 0.045$ with respect to the statistical error of
the DES Y1 data vector. We also find that angular binning and survey mask do
not impact our analytic covariance at a significant level. We determine lower
bounds on scales used for analysis of galaxy clustering (8 Mpc$~h^{-1}$) and
galaxy-galaxy lensing (12 Mpc$~h^{-1}$) such that the impact of modeling
uncertainties in the non-linear regime is well below statistical errors, and
show that our analysis choices are robust against a variety of systematics.
These tests demonstrate that we have a robust analysis pipeline that yields
unbiased cosmological parameter inferences for the flagship 3x2pt DES Y1
analysis. We emphasize that the level of independent code development and
subsequent code comparison as demonstrated in this paper is necessary to
produce credible constraints from increasingly complex multi-probe analyses of
current data.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.02951 [pdf] - 1577513
Real-Time Recovery Efficiencies and Performance of the Palomar Transient
Factory's Transient Discovery Pipeline
Submitted: 2017-04-10
We present the transient source detection efficiencies of the Palomar
Transient Factory (PTF), parameterizing the number of transients that PTF
found, versus the number of similar transients that occurred over the same
period in the survey search area but that were missed. PTF was an optical sky
survey carried out with the Palomar 48-inch telescope over 2009-2012, observing
more than 8000 square degrees of sky with cadences of between 1 and 5 days,
locating around 50,000 non-moving transient sources, and spectroscopically
confirming around 1900 supernovae. We assess the effectiveness with which PTF
detected transient sources, by inserting ~7 million artificial point sources
into real PTF data. We then study the efficiency with which the PTF real-time
pipeline recovered these sources as a function of the source magnitude, host
galaxy surface brightness, and various observing conditions (using proxies for
seeing, sky brightness, and transparency). The product of this study is a
multi-dimensional recovery efficiency grid appropriate for the range of
observing conditions that PTF experienced, and that can then be used for
studies of the rates, environments, and luminosity functions of different
transient types using detailed Monte Carlo simulations. We illustrate the
technique using the observationally well-understood class of type Ia
supernovae.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.00637 [pdf] - 1531842
Imprint of DES super-structures on the Cosmic Microwave Background
Kovács, A.;
Sánchez, C.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Nadathur, S.;
Crittenden, R.;
Gruen, D.;
Huterer, D.;
Bacon, D.;
DeRose, J.;
Dodelson, S.;
Gaztañaga, E.;
Kirk, D.;
Lahav, O.;
Miquel, R.;
Naidoo, K.;
Peacock, J. A.;
Soergel, B.;
Whiteway, L.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2016-10-03, last modified: 2016-11-15
Small temperature anisotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background can be
sourced by density perturbations via the late-time integrated Sachs-Wolfe
effect. Large voids and superclusters are excellent environments to make a
localized measurement of this tiny imprint. In some cases excess signals have
been reported. We probed these claims with an independent data set, using the
first year data of the Dark Energy Survey in a different footprint, and using a
different super-structure finding strategy. We identified 52 large voids and
102 superclusters at redshifts $0.2 < z < 0.65$. We used the Jubilee simulation
to a priori evaluate the optimal ISW measurement configuration for our
compensated top-hat filtering technique, and then performed a stacking
measurement of the CMB temperature field based on the DES data. For optimal
configurations, we detected a cumulative cold imprint of voids with $\Delta
T_{f} \approx -5.0\pm3.7~\mu K$ and a hot imprint of superclusters $\Delta
T_{f} \approx 5.1\pm3.2~\mu K$ ; this is $\sim1.2\sigma$ higher than the
expected $|\Delta T_{f}| \approx 0.6~\mu K$ imprint of such super-structures in
$\Lambda$CDM. If we instead use an a posteriori selected filter size
($R/R_{v}=0.6$), we can find a temperature decrement as large as $\Delta T_{f}
\approx -9.8\pm4.7~\mu K$ for voids, which is $\sim2\sigma$ above $\Lambda$CDM
expectations and is comparable to previous measurements made using SDSS
super-structure data.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.03982 [pdf] - 1503913
Cosmic Voids and Void Lensing in the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification Data
Sánchez, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Kovacs, A.;
Jain, B.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Nadathur, S.;
Gruen, D.;
Hamaus, N.;
Huterer, D.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Amara, A.;
Bonnett, C.;
DeRose, J.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lahav, O.;
Miquel, R.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sheldon, E.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2016-05-12, last modified: 2016-10-21
Galaxies and their dark matter halos populate a complicated filamentary
network around large, nearly empty regions known as cosmic voids. Cosmic voids
are usually identified in spectroscopic galaxy surveys, where 3D information
about the large-scale structure of the Universe is available. Although an
increasing amount of photometric data is being produced, its potential for void
studies is limited since photometric redshifts induce line-of-sight position
errors of $\sim50$ Mpc/$h$ or more that can render many voids undetectable. In
this paper we present a new void finder designed for photometric surveys,
validate it using simulations, and apply it to the high-quality photo-$z$
redMaGiC galaxy sample of the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification (DES-SV)
data. The algorithm works by projecting galaxies into 2D slices and finding
voids in the smoothed 2D galaxy density field of the slice. Fixing the
line-of-sight size of the slices to be at least twice the photo-$z$ scatter,
the number of voids found in these projected slices of simulated spectroscopic
and photometric galaxy catalogs is within 20% for all transverse void sizes,
and indistinguishable for the largest voids of radius $\sim 70$ Mpc/$h$ and
larger. The positions, radii, and projected galaxy profiles of photometric
voids also accurately match the spectroscopic void sample. Applying the
algorithm to the DES-SV data in the redshift range $0.2<z<0.8$, we identify 87
voids with comoving radii spanning the range 18-120 Mpc/$h$, and carry out a
stacked weak lensing measurement. With a significance of $4.4\sigma$, the
lensing measurement confirms the voids are truly underdense in the matter field
and hence not a product of Poisson noise, tracer density effects or systematics
in the data. It also demonstrates, for the first time in real data, the
viability of void lensing studies in photometric surveys.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.07871 [pdf] - 1494677
Cosmology from large scale galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
Kwan, Juliana;
Sanchez, Carles;
Clampitt, Joseph;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Crocce, Martin;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Zuntz, Joe;
Amara, Adam;
Becker, Matthew;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bonnett, Christopher;
DeRose, Joseph;
Dodelson, Scott;
Eifler, Tim;
Gaztanaga, Enrique;
Giannantonio, Tommaso;
Gruen, Daniel;
Hartley, Will;
Kacprzak, Tomasz;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Krause, Elisabeth;
MacCrann, Niall;
Miquel, Ramon;
Park, Youngsoo;
Ross, Ashley;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Sheldon, Erin;
Troxel, Michael A.;
Wechsler, Risa;
Abbott, Tim;
Abdalla, Filipe;
Allam, Sahar;
Benoit-Lévy, Aurélien;
Brooks, David;
Burke, David;
Rosell, Aurelio Carnero;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Cunha, Carlos;
D'Andrea, Chris;
da Costa, Luiz;
Desai, Shantanu;
Diehl, H. Thomas;
Dietrich, Jörg;
Doel, Peter;
Evrard, August;
Fernandez, Enrique;
Finley, David;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Fosalba, Pablo;
Frieman, Josh;
Gerdes, David;
Gruendl, Robert;
Gutierrez, Gaston;
Honscheid, Klaus;
James, David;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kuehn, Kyler;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lima, Marcos;
Maia, Marcio;
Marshall, Jennifer;
Martini, Paul;
Melchior, Peter;
Mohr, Joe;
Nichol, Robert;
Nord, Brian;
Plazas, Andres;
Reil, Kevin;
Romer, Kathy;
Roodman, Aaron;
Sanchez, Eusebio;
Scarpine, Vic;
Sevilla, Ignacio;
Smith, R. Chris;
Soares-Santos, Marcelle;
Sobreira, Flavia;
Suchyta, Eric;
Swanson, Molly;
Tarle, Gregory;
Thomas, Daniel;
Vikram, Vinu;
Walker, Alistair
Submitted: 2016-04-26
We present cosmological constraints from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) using a
combined analysis of angular clustering of red galaxies and their
cross-correlation with weak gravitational lensing of background galaxies. We
use a 139 square degree contiguous patch of DES data from the Science
Verification (SV) period of observations. Using large scale measurements, we
constrain the matter density of the Universe as Omega_m = 0.31 +/- 0.09 and the
clustering amplitude of the matter power spectrum as sigma_8 = 0.74 +/- 0.13
after marginalizing over seven nuisance parameters and three additional
cosmological parameters. This translates into S_8 = sigma_8(Omega_m/0.3)^{0.16}
= 0.74 +/- 0.12 for our fiducial lens redshift bin at 0.35 <z< 0.5, while S_8 =
0.78 +/- 0.09 using two bins over the range 0.2 <z< 0.5. We study the
robustness of the results under changes in the data vectors, modelling and
systematics treatment, including photometric redshift and shear calibration
uncertainties, and find consistency in the derived cosmological parameters. We
show that our results are consistent with previous cosmological analyses from
DES and other data sets and conclude with a joint analysis of DES angular
clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing with Planck CMB data, Baryon Accoustic
Oscillations and Supernova type Ia measurements.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.6344 [pdf] - 1201850
The Host Galaxies of Type Ia Supernovae Discovered by the Palomar
Transient Factory
Pan, Y. -C.;
Sullivan, M.;
Maguire, K.;
Hook, I. M.;
Nugent, P. E.;
Howell, D. A.;
Arcavi, I.;
Botyanszki, J.;
Cenko, S. B.;
DeRose, J.;
Fakhouri, H. K.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Hsiao, E.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Laher, R. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Nordin, J.;
Walker, E. S.;
Xu, D.
Submitted: 2013-11-25
We present spectroscopic observations of the host galaxies of 82 low-redshift
type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) discovered by the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF).
We determine star-formation rates, gas-phase/stellar metallicities, and stellar
masses and ages of these objects. As expected, strong correlations between the
SN Ia light-curve width (stretch) and the host age/mass/metallicity are found:
fainter, faster-declining events tend to be hosted by older/massive/metal-rich
galaxies. There is some evidence that redder SNe Ia explode in higher
metallicity galaxies, but we found no relation between the SN colour and host
galaxy extinction based on the Balmer decrement, suggesting that the colour
variation of these SNe does not primarily arise from this source. SNe Ia in
higher-mass/metallicity galaxies also appear brighter after stretch/colour
corrections than their counterparts in lower mass hosts, and the stronger
correlation is with gas-phase metallicity suggesting this may be the more
important variable. We also compared the host stellar mass distribution to that
in galaxy targeted SN surveys and the high-redshift untargeted Supernova Legacy
Survey (SNLS). SNLS has many more low mass galaxies, while the targeted
searches have fewer. This can be explained by an evolution in the galaxy
stellar mass function, coupled with a SN delay-time distribution proportional
to $t^{-1}$. Finally, we found no significant difference in the
mass--metallicity relation of our SN Ia hosts compared to field galaxies,
suggesting any metallicity effect on the SN Ia rate is small.
