Normalized to: DePontieu, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.11254 [pdf] - 2076869
Is the High-Resolution Coronal Imager Resolving Coronal Strands? Results
from AR 12712
Williams, Thomas;
Walsh, Robert W.;
Winebarger, Amy R.;
Brooks, David H.;
Cirtain, Jonathan W.;
Depontieu, Bart;
Golub, Leon;
Kobayashi, Ken;
Mckenzie, David E.;
Morton, Richard J.;
Peter, Hardi;
Rachmeler, Laurel A.;
Savage, Sabrina L.;
Testa, Paola;
Tiwari, Sanjiv K.;
Warren, Harry P.;
Watkinson, Benjamin J.
Submitted: 2020-01-30
Following the success of the first mission, the High-Resolution Coronal
Imager (Hi-C) was launched for a third time (Hi-C 2.1) on 29th May 2018 from
the White Sands Missile Range, NM, USA. On this occasion, 329 seconds of 17.2
nm data of target active region AR 12712 was captured with a cadence of ~4s,
and a plate scale of 0.129''/pixel. Using data captured by Hi-C 2.1 and
co-aligned observations from SDO/AIA 17.1 nm we investigate the widths of 49
coronal strands. We search for evidence of substructure within the strands that
is not detected by AIA, and further consider whether these strands are fully
resolved by Hi-C 2.1. With the aid of Multi-Scale Gaussian Normalization (MGN),
strands from a region of low-emission that can only be visualized against the
contrast of the darker, underlying moss are studied. A comparison is made
between these low-emission strands with those from regions of higher emission
within the target active region. It is found that Hi-C 2.1 can resolve
individual strands as small as ~202km, though more typical strands widths seen
are ~513km. For coronal strands within the region of low-emission, the most
likely width is significantly narrower than the high-emission strands at
~388km. This places the low-emission coronal strands beneath the resolving
capabilities of SDO/AIA, highlighting the need of a permanent solar observatory
with the resolving power of Hi-C.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.00587 [pdf] - 1388154
ALMA Observations of the Sun in Cycle 4 and Beyond
Wedemeyer, S.;
Fleck, B.;
Battaglia, M.;
Labrosse, N.;
Fleishman, G.;
Hudson, H.;
Antolin, P.;
Alissandrakis, C.;
Ayres, T.;
Ballester, J.;
Bastian, T.;
Black, J.;
Benz, A.;
Brajsa, R.;
Carlsson, M.;
Costa, J.;
DePontieu, B.;
Doyle, G.;
de Castro, G. Gimenez;
Gunár, S.;
Harper, G.;
Jafarzadeh, S.;
Loukitcheva, M.;
Nakariakov, V.;
Oliver, R.;
Schmieder, B.;
Selhorst, C.;
Shimojo, M.;
Simões, P.;
Soler, R.;
Temmer, M.;
Tiwari, S.;
Van Doorsselaere, T.;
Veronig, A.;
White, S.;
Yagoubov, P.;
Zaqarashvili, T.
Submitted: 2016-01-04, last modified: 2016-04-11
This document was created by the Solar Simulations for the Atacama Large
Millimeter Observatory Network (SSALMON) in preparation of the first regular
observations of the Sun with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array
(ALMA), which are anticipated to start in ALMA Cycle 4 in October 2016. The
science cases presented here demonstrate that a large number of scientifically
highly interesting observations could be made already with the still limited
solar observing modes foreseen for Cycle 4 and that ALMA has the potential to
make important contributions to answering long-standing scientific questions in
solar physics. With the proposal deadline for ALMA Cycle 4 in April 2016 and
the Commissioning and Science Verification campaign in December 2015 in sight,
several of the SSALMON Expert Teams composed strategic documents in which they
outlined potential solar observations that could be feasible given the
anticipated technical capabilities in Cycle 4. These documents have been
combined and supplemented with an analysis, resulting in recommendations for
solar observing with ALMA in Cycle 4. In addition, the detailed science cases
also demonstrate the scientific priorities of the solar physics community and
which capabilities are wanted for the next observing cycles. The work on this
White Paper effort was coordinated in close cooperation with the two
international solar ALMA development studies led by T. Bastian (NRAO, USA) and
R. Brajsa, (ESO). This document will be further updated until the beginning of
Cycle 4 in October 2016. In particular, we plan to adjust the technical
capabilities of the solar observing modes once finally decided and to further
demonstrate the feasibility and scientific potential of the included science
cases by means of numerical simulations of the solar atmosphere and
corresponding simulated ALMA observations.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1306.5194 [pdf] - 1172202
Anti-parallel EUV flows observed along active region filament threads
with Hi-C
Alexander, Caroline E.;
Walsh, Robert W.;
Regnier, Stephane;
Cirtain, Jonathan;
Winebarger, Amy R.;
Golub, Leon;
Kobayashi, Ken;
Platt, Simon;
Mitchell, Nick;
Korreck, Kelly;
DePontieu, Bart;
DeForest, Craig;
Weber, Mark;
Title, Alan;
Kuzin, Sergey
Submitted: 2013-06-21
Plasma flows within prominences/filaments have been observed for many years
and hold valuable clues concerning the mass and energy balance within these
structures. Previous observations of these flows primarily come from H-alpha
and cool EUV lines (e.g., 304A) where estimates of the size of the prominence
threads has been limited by the resolution of the available instrumentation.
Evidence of `counter-steaming' flows has previously been inferred from these
cool plasma observations but now, for the first time, these flows have been
directly imaged along fundamental filament threads within the million degree
corona (at 193A). In this work we present observations of an active region
filament observed with Hi-C that exhibits anti-parallel flows along adjacent
filament threads. Complementary data from SDO/AIA and HMI are presented. The
ultra-high spatial and temporal resolution of Hi-C allow the anti-parallel flow
velocities to be measured (70-80 km/s) and gives an indication of the
resolvable thickness of the individual strands (0.8'' +/- 0.1''). The
temperature distribution of the plasma flows was estimated to be log T(K) =
5.45 +/- 0.10 using EM loci analysis. We find that SDO/AIA cannot clearly
observe these anti-parallel flows nor measure their velocity or thread width
due to its larger pixel size. We suggest that
anti-parallel/counter-streaming flows are likely commonplace within all
filaments and are currently not observed in EUV due to current instrument
spatial resolution.