Normalized to: Delgado, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.02464 [pdf] - 1859121
4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals
de Jong, R. S.;
Agertz, O.;
Berbel, A. Agudo;
Aird, J.;
Alexander, D. A.;
Amarsi, A.;
Anders, F.;
Andrae, R.;
Ansarinejad, B.;
Ansorge, W.;
Antilogus, P.;
Anwand-Heerwart, H.;
Arentsen, A.;
Arnadottir, A.;
Asplund, M.;
Auger, M.;
Azais, N.;
Baade, D.;
Baker, G.;
Baker, S.;
Balbinot, E.;
Baldry, I. K.;
Banerji, M.;
Barden, S.;
Barklem, P.;
Barthélémy-Mazot, E.;
Battistini, C.;
Bauer, S.;
Bell, C. P. M.;
Bellido-Tirado, O.;
Bellstedt, S.;
Belokurov, V.;
Bensby, T.;
Bergemann, M.;
Bestenlehner, J. M.;
Bielby, R.;
Bilicki, M.;
Blake, C.;
Bland-Hawthorn, J.;
Boeche, C.;
Boland, W.;
Boller, T.;
Bongard, S.;
Bongiorno, A.;
Bonifacio, P.;
Boudon, D.;
Brooks, D.;
Brown, M. J. I.;
Brown, R.;
Brüggen, M.;
Brynnel, J.;
Brzeski, J.;
Buchert, T.;
Buschkamp, P.;
Caffau, E.;
Caillier, P.;
Carrick, J.;
Casagrande, L.;
Case, S.;
Casey, A.;
Cesarini, I.;
Cescutti, G.;
Chapuis, D.;
Chiappini, C.;
Childress, M.;
Christlieb, N.;
Church, R.;
Cioni, M. -R. L.;
Cluver, M.;
Colless, M.;
Collett, T.;
Comparat, J.;
Cooper, A.;
Couch, W.;
Courbin, F.;
Croom, S.;
Croton, D.;
Daguisé, E.;
Dalton, G.;
Davies, L. J. M.;
Davis, T.;
de Laverny, P.;
Deason, A.;
Dionies, F.;
Disseau, K.;
Doel, P.;
Döscher, D.;
Driver, S. P.;
Dwelly, T.;
Eckert, D.;
Edge, A.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Youssoufi, D. El;
Elhaddad, A.;
Enke, H.;
Erfanianfar, G.;
Farrell, T.;
Fechner, T.;
Feiz, C.;
Feltzing, S.;
Ferreras, I.;
Feuerstein, D.;
Feuillet, D.;
Finoguenov, A.;
Ford, D.;
Fotopoulou, S.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frenk, C.;
Frey, S.;
Gaessler, W.;
Geier, S.;
Fusillo, N. Gentile;
Gerhard, O.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Giannone, D.;
Gibson, B.;
Gillingham, P.;
González-Fernández, C.;
Gonzalez-Solares, E.;
Gottloeber, S.;
Gould, A.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guiglion, G.;
Haehnelt, M.;
Hahn, T.;
Hansen, C. J.;
Hartman, H.;
Hauptner, K.;
Hawkins, K.;
Haynes, D.;
Haynes, R.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Aguayo, C. Hernandez;
Hewett, P.;
Hinton, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hoenig, S.;
Hofman, D.;
Hook, I.;
Hopgood, J.;
Hopkins, A.;
Hourihane, A.;
Howes, L.;
Howlett, C.;
Huet, T.;
Irwin, M.;
Iwert, O.;
Jablonka, P.;
Jahn, T.;
Jahnke, K.;
Jarno, A.;
Jin, S.;
Jofre, P.;
Johl, D.;
Jones, D.;
Jönsson, H.;
Jordan, C.;
Karovicova, I.;
Khalatyan, A.;
Kelz, A.;
Kennicutt, R.;
King, D.;
Kitaura, F.;
Klar, J.;
Klauser, U.;
Kneib, J.;
Koch, A.;
Koposov, S.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Korn, A.;
Kosmalski, J.;
Kotak, R.;
Kovalev, M.;
Kreckel, K.;
Kripak, Y.;
Krumpe, M.;
Kuijken, K.;
Kunder, A.;
Kushniruk, I.;
Lam, M. I;
Lamer, G.;
Laurent, F.;
Lawrence, J.;
Lehmitz, M.;
Lemasle, B.;
Lewis, J.;
Li, B.;
Lidman, C.;
Lind, K.;
Liske, J.;
Lizon, J. -L.;
Loveday, J.;
Ludwig, H. -G.;
McDermid, R. M.;
Maguire, K.;
Mainieri, V.;
Mali, S.;
Mandel, H.;
Mandel, K.;
Mannering, L.;
Martell, S.;
Delgado, D. Martinez;
Matijevic, G.;
McGregor, H.;
McMahon, R.;
McMillan, P.;
Mena, O.;
Merloni, A.;
Meyer, M. J.;
Michel, C.;
Micheva, G.;
Migniau, J. -E.;
Minchev, I.;
Monari, G.;
Muller, R.;
Murphy, D.;
Muthukrishna, D.;
Nandra, K.;
Navarro, R.;
Ness, M.;
Nichani, V.;
Nichol, R.;
Nicklas, H.;
Niederhofer, F.;
Norberg, P.;
Obreschkow, D.;
Oliver, S.;
Owers, M.;
Pai, N.;
Pankratow, S.;
Parkinson, D.;
Parry, I.;
Paschke, J.;
Paterson, R.;
Pecontal, A.;
Phillips, D.;
Pillepich, A.;
Pinard, L.;
Pirard, J.;
Piskunov, N.;
Plank, V.;
Plüschke, D.;
Pons, E.;
Popesso, P.;
Power, C.;
Pragt, J.;
Pramskiy, A.;
Pryer, D.;
Quattri, M.;
Queiroz, A. B. de Andrade;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Rahurkar, S.;
Raichoor, A.;
Ramstedt, S.;
Rau, A.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Reiss, R.;
Renaud, F.;
Revaz, Y.;
Rhode, P.;
Richard, J.;
Richter, A. D.;
Rix, H. -W.;
Robotham, A. S. G.;
Roelfsema, R.;
Romaniello, M.;
Rosario, D.;
Rothmaier, F.;
Roukema, B.;
Ruchti, G.;
Rupprecht, G.;
Rybizki, J.;
Ryde, N.;
Saar, A.;
Sadler, E.;
Sahlén, M.;
Salvato, M.;
Sassolas, B.;
Saunders, W.;
Saviauk, A.;
Sbordone, L.;
Schmidt, T.;
Schnurr, O.;
Scholz, R. -D.;
Schwope, A.;
Seifert, W.;
Shanks, T.;
Sheinis, A.;
Sivov, T.;
Skúladóttir, Á.;
Smartt, S.;
Smedley, S.;
Smith, G.;
Smith, R.;
Sorce, J.;
Spitler, L.;
Starkenburg, E.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Stilz, I.;
Storm, J.;
Sullivan, M.;
Sutherland, W.;
Swann, E.;
Tamone, A.;
Taylor, E. N.;
Teillon, J.;
Tempel, E.;
ter Horst, R.;
Thi, W. -F.;
Tolstoy, E.;
Trager, S.;
Traven, G.;
Tremblay, P. -E.;
Tresse, L.;
Valentini, M.;
van de Weygaert, R.;
Ancker, M. van den;
Veljanoski, J.;
Venkatesan, S.;
Wagner, L.;
Wagner, K.;
Walcher, C. J.;
Waller, L.;
Walton, N.;
Wang, L.;
Winkler, R.;
Wisotzki, L.;
Worley, C. C.;
Worseck, G.;
Xiang, M.;
Xu, W.;
Yong, D.;
Zhao, C.;
Zheng, J.;
Zscheyge, F.;
Zucker, D.
Submitted: 2019-03-06, last modified: 2019-04-01
We introduce the 4-metre Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope (4MOST), a new
high-multiplex, wide-field spectroscopic survey facility under development for
the four-metre-class Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy
(VISTA) at Paranal. Its key specifications are: a large field of view (FoV) of
4.2 square degrees and a high multiplex capability, with 1624 fibres feeding
two low-resolution spectrographs ($R = \lambda/\Delta\lambda \sim 6500$), and
812 fibres transferring light to the high-resolution spectrograph ($R \sim
20\,000$). After a description of the instrument and its expected performance,
a short overview is given of its operational scheme and planned 4MOST
Consortium science; these aspects are covered in more detail in other articles
in this edition of The Messenger. Finally, the processes, schedules, and
policies concerning the selection of ESO Community Surveys are presented,
commencing with a singular opportunity to submit Letters of Intent for Public
Surveys during the first five years of 4MOST operations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.04002 [pdf] - 1374341
An overmassive Dark Halo around an Ultra-diffuse Galaxy in the Virgo
Cluster
Submitted: 2016-02-12, last modified: 2016-02-15
Ultra diffuse galaxies (UDGs) have the sizes of giant galaxies but the
luminosities of dwarfs. A key to understanding their origins comes from their
total masses, but their low surface brightnesses ($\mu(V) \geq$ 25.0) generally
prohibit dynamical studies. Here we report the first such measurements for a
UDG (VCC~1287 in the Virgo cluster), based on its globular cluster system
dynamics and size. From 7 GCs we measure a mean systemic velocity $v_{\rm sys}$
= 1071$^{+14}_{-15}$ km/s, thereby confirming a Virgo-cluster association. We
measure a velocity dispersion of 33$^{+16}_{-10}$ km/s within 8.1 kpc,
corresponding to an enclosed mass of $(4.5 \pm 2.8)\times10^{9}$ $M_{\odot}$
and a $g$-band mass-to-light ratio of $(M/L)_g = 106^{+126}_{-54}$. From the
cumulative mass curve, along with the GC numbers, we estimate a virial mass of
$\sim8\times10^{10}$ $M_{\odot}$, yielding a dark-to-stellar mass fraction of
$\sim3000$. We show that this UDG is an outlier in $M_{\rm star} - M_{\rm
halo}$ relations, suggesting extreme stochasticity in relatively massive
star-forming halos in clusters. Finally, we discuss how counting GCs offers an
efficient route to determining virial masses for UDGs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0302179 [pdf] - 54806
`Thermal' SiO radio line emission towards M-type AGB stars: a probe of
circumstellar dust formation and dynamics
Submitted: 2003-02-10, last modified: 2003-09-02
An extensive radiative transfer analysis of circumstellar SiO `thermal' radio
line emission from a large sample of M-type AGB stars has been performed. The
sample contains 18 irregulars of type Lb (IRV), 7 and 34 semiregulars of type
SRa and SRb (SRV), respectively, and 12 Miras. New observational material,
which contains data in several SiO rotational lines in the ground vibrational
state, is presented for the IRV/SRVs. The detection rate was about 60%. SiO
fractional abundances have been determined through radiative transfer
modelling. The abundance distribution of the IRV/SRV sample has a median value
of 8E-6. The high mass loss rate Miras have a bimodal abundance distribution, a
low abundance group (on average 4E-7) and a high abundance group (on average
7E-6). The derived SiO abundances are in all cases well below the abundance
expected from stellar atmosphere chemistry, on average by a factor of ten. In
addition, there is a trend of decreasing SiO abundance with increasing mass
loss rate. This is interpreted in terms of depletion of SiO molecules by the
formation of silicate grains in the circumstellar envelopes, with an efficiency
which increases with the mass loss rate. The SiO and CO radio line profiles
differ in shape. In general, the dominating part of the SiO profiles are
narrower than the CO profiles, but they have low-intensity wings which cover
the full velocity range of the CO profile. This is interpreted (as has been
done also by others) as due to the influence of gas acceleration in the region
which produces a significant fraction of the SiO line emission. Finally, a
number of sources which have peculiar CO line profiles are discussed from the
point of view of their SiO line properties.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0206172 [pdf] - 49803
Mass loss rates of a sample of irregular and semiregular M-type
AGB-variables
Submitted: 2002-06-11
We have determined mass loss rates and gas expansion velocities for a sample
of 69 M-type irregular (IRV; 22 objects) and semiregular (SRV; 47 objects)
AGB-variables using a radiative transfer code to model their circumstellar CO
radio line emission. We believe that this sample is representative for the mass
losing stars of this type. The (molecular hydrogen) mass loss rate distribution
has a median value of 2.0E-7 solar masses per year. M-type IRVs and SRVs with a
mass loss rate in excess of 5E-7 solar masses per year must be very rare, and
among these mass losing stars the number of sources with mass loss rates below
a few 10E-8 solar masses per year must be small. We find no significant
difference between the IRVs and the SRVs in terms of their mass loss
characteristics. Among the SRVs the mass loss rate shows no dependence on the
period. Likewise the mass loss rate shows no correlation with the stellar
temperature. The gas expansion velocity distribution has a median of 7.0 km/s.
The mass loss rate and the gas expansion velocity correlate well, a result in
line with theoretical predictions for an optically thin, dust-driven wind. In
general, the model produces line profiles which acceptably fit the observed
ones.
We have compared the results of this M-star sample with a similar C-star
sample analysed in the same way. The mass loss rate characteristics are very
similar for the two samples. On the contrary, the gas expansion velocity
distributions are clearly different. In particular, the number of low-velocity
sources is much higher in the M-star sample. We found no example of the sharply
double-peaked CO line profile, which is evidence of a large, detached CO-shell,
among the M-stars. About 10% of the C-stars show this phenomenon.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0104140 [pdf] - 41879
Imaging of detached shells around the carbon stars R Scl and U Ant
through scattered stellar light
Submitted: 2001-04-09
We present the first optical images of scattered light from large, detached
gas/dust shells around two carbon stars, R Scl and U Ant, obtained in narrow
band filters centred on the resonance lines of neutral K and Na, and in a Str.
b filter (only U Ant). They confirm results obtained in CO radio line
observations, but also reveal new and interesting structures. Towards R Scl the
scattering appears optically thick in both the K and Na filters, and both
images outline almost perfectly circular disks with essentially uniform
intensity out to a sharp outer radius of 21". These disks are larger -- by
about a factor of two -- than the radius of the detached shell which has been
marginally resolved in CO radio line data. In U Ant the scattering in the K
filter appears to be, at least partially, optically thin, and the image is
consistent with scattering in a geometrically thin (3") shell (radius 43") with
an overall spherical symmetry. The size of this shell agrees very well with
that of the detached shell seen in CO radio line emission. The scattering in
the Na filter appears more optically thick, and the image suggests the presence
of at least one, possibly two, shells inside the 43" shell. There is no
evidence for such a multiple-shell structure in the CO data, but this can be
due to considerably lower masses for these inner shells. Weak scattering
appears also in a shell which is located outside the 43" shell. The present
data do not allow us to conclusively identify the scattering agent, but we
argue that most of the emission in the K and Na filter images is to due to
resonance line scattering, and that there is also a weaker contribution from
dust scattering in the U Ant data. Awaiting new observational data, our
interpretation must be regarded as tentative.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0101425 [pdf] - 40563
Detection of the optical afterglow of GRB 000630: Implications for dark
bursts
Fynbo, J. U.;
Jensen, B. L.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Hjorth, J.;
Pedersen, H.;
Moller, P.;
Abbott, T.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Delgado, D.;
Greiner, J.;
Henden, A.;
Magazzu, A.;
Masetti, N.;
Merlino, S.;
Masegosa, J.;
Oestensen, R.;
Palazzi, E.;
Pian, E.;
Schwarz, H. E.;
Cline, T.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Hurley, K.;
Mazets, E.;
McClanahan, T.;
Montanari, E.;
Starr, R.;
Trombka, J.
Submitted: 2001-01-24
We present the discovery of the optical transient of the long-duration
gamma-ray burst GRB000630. The optical transient was detected with the Nordic
Optical Telescope 21.1 hours after the burst. At the time of discovery the
magnitude of the transient was R = 23.04+-0.08. The transient displayed a
power-law decline characterized by a decay slope of alpha = -1.035+-0.097. A
deep image obtained 25 days after the burst shows no indication of a
contribution from a supernova or a host galaxy at the position of the
transient. The closest detected galaxy is a R=24.68+-0.15 galaxy 2.0 arcsec
north of the transient.
The magnitudes of the optical afterglows of GRB980329, GRB980613 and
GRB000630 were all R>=23 less than 24 hours from the burst epoch. We discuss
the implications of this for our understanding of GRBs without detected optical
transients. We conclude that i) based on the gamma-ray properties of the
current sample we cannot conclude that GRBs with no detected OTs belong to
another class of GRBs than GRBs with detected OTs and ii) the majority (>75%)
of GRBs for which searches for optical afterglow have been unsuccessful are
consistent with no detection if they were similar to bursts like GRB000630 at
optical wavelengths.