Normalized to: Del Puppo, F.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.08678 [pdf] - 2036410
Unravelling the complex behavior of Mrk 421 with simultaneous X-ray and
VHE observations during an extreme flaring activity in April 2013
MAGIC collaboration;
Acciari, V. A.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Engels, A. Arbet;
Baack, D.;
Babic, A.;
Banerjee, B.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
Gonzalez, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bellizzi, L.;
Bernardini, E.;
Berti, A.;
Besenrieder, J.;
Bhattacharyya, W.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bosnjak, Z.;
Busetto, G.;
Carosi, R.;
Ceribella, G.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chai, Y.;
Chilingarian, A.;
Cikota, S.;
Colak, S. M.;
Colin, U.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
D'Elia, V.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Lotto, B.;
Del Puppo, F.;
Delfino, M.;
Delgado, J.;
Depaoli, D.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Espineira, E. Do Souto;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Donini, A.;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Ramazani, V. Fallah;
Fattorini, A.;
Ferrara, G.;
Foffano, L.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Fruck, C.;
Fukami, S.;
Lopez, R. J. Garcia;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gasparyan, S.;
Gaug, M.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Gliwny, P.;
Godinovic, N.;
Green, D.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hahn, A.;
Herrera, J.;
Hoang, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Hutten, M.;
Inada, T.;
Inoue, S.;
Ishio, K.;
Iwamura, Y.;
Jouvin, L.;
Kajiwara, Y.;
Kerszberg, D.;
Kobayashi, Y.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
Lamastra, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Leone, F.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
Lopez, M.;
Lopez-Coto, R.;
Lopez-Oramas, A.;
Loporchio, S.;
Fraga, B. Machado de Oliveira;
Maggio, C.;
Majumdar, P.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martinez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Mender, S.;
Micanovic, S.;
Miceli, D.;
Miener, T.;
Minev, M.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Molina, E.;
Moralejo, A.;
Morcuende, D.;
Moreno, V.;
Moretti, E.;
Munar-Adrover, P.;
Neustroev, V.;
Nigro, C.;
Nilsson, K.;
Ninci, D.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogues, L.;
Nozaki, S.;
Ohtani, Y.;
Oka, T.;
Otero-Santos, J.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Pavletic, L.;
Penil, P.;
Peresano, M.;
Persic, M.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribo, M.;
Rico, J.;
Righi, C.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Saha, L.;
Sahakyan, N.;
Saito, T.;
Sakurai, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Schleicher, B.;
Schmidt, K.;
Schweizer, T.;
Sitarek, J.;
Snidaric, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Spolon, A.;
Stamerra, A.;
Strom, D.;
Strzys, M.;
Suda, Y.;
Suric, T.;
Takahashi, M.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzic, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Torres-Alba, N.;
Tosti, L.;
van Scherpenberg, J.;
Vanzo, G.;
Acosta, M. Vazquez;
Ventura, S.;
Verguilov, V.;
Vigorito, C. F.;
Vitale, V.;
Vovk, I.;
Will, M.;
Zaric, D.;
groups, Other;
:;
Petropoulou, M.;
Finke, J.;
D'Ammando, F.;
Balokovic, M.;
Madejski, G.;
Mori, K.;
Puccetti, Simonetta;
Leto, C.;
Perri, M.;
Verrecchia, F.;
Villata, M.;
Raiteri, C. M.;
Agudo, I.;
Bachev, R.;
Berdyugin, A.;
Blinov, D. A.;
Chanishvili, R.;
Chen, W. P.;
Chigladze, R.;
Damljanovic, G.;
Eswaraiah, C.;
Grishina, T. S.;
Ibryamov, S.;
Jordan, B.;
Jorstad, S. G.;
Joshi, M.;
Kopatskaya, E. N.;
Kurtanidze, O. M.;
Kurtanidze, S. O.;
Larionova, E. G.;
Larionova, L. V.;
Larionov, V. M.;
Latev, G.;
Lin, H. C.;
Marscher, A. P.;
Mokrushina, A. A.;
Morozova, D. A.;
Nikolashvili, M. G.;
Semkov, E.;
Smith, P. S.;
Strigachev, A.;
Troitskaya, Yu. V.;
Troitsky, I. S.;
Vince, O.;
Barnes, J.;
Guever, T.;
Moody, J. W.;
Sadun, A. C.;
Hovatta, T.;
Richards, J. L.;
Max-Moerbeck, W.;
Readhead, A. C. R.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tammi, J.;
Ramakrishnan, V.;
Reinthal, R.
Submitted: 2020-01-23
We report on a multi-band variability and correlation study of the TeV blazar
Mrk 421 during an exceptional flaring activity observed from 2013 April 11 to
2013 April 19. The study uses, among others, data from GASP-WEBT, Swift,
NuSTAR, Fermi-LAT, VERITAS, and MAGIC. The large blazar activity, and the 43
hours of simultaneous NuSTAR and MAGIC/VERITAS observations, permitted
variability studies on 15 minute time bins, and over three X-ray bands (3-7
keV, 7-30 keV and 30-80 keV) and three very-high-energy (>0.1 TeV, hereafter
VHE) gamma-ray bands (0.2-0.4 TeV, 0.4-0.8 TeV and >0.8 TeV). We detected
substantial flux variations on multi-hour and sub-hour timescales in all the
X-ray and VHE gamma-ray bands. The characteristics of the sub-hour flux
variations are essentially energy-independent, while the multi-hour flux
variations can have a strong dependence on the energy of the X-ray and the VHE
gamma rays. The three VHE bands and the three X-ray bands are positively
correlated with no time-lag, but the strength and the characteristics of the
correlation changes substantially over time and across energy bands. Our
findings favour multi-zone scenarios for explaining the achromatic/chromatic
variability of the fast/slow components of the light curves, as well as the
changes in the flux-flux correlation on day-long timescales. We interpret these
results within a magnetic reconnection scenario, where the multi-hour flux
variations are dominated by the combined emission from various plasmoids of
different sizes and velocities, while the sub-hour flux variations are
dominated by the emission from a single small plasmoid moving across the
magnetic reconnection layer.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.03971 [pdf] - 1957441
Following up GW Alerts With MAGIC: The Third LIGO/Virgo Observation Run
Miceli, Davide;
Antonelli, Lucio Angelo;
Gonzalez, Josefa Becerra;
Berti, Alessio;
Bousnjak, uZeljka;
Covino, Stefano;
De Lotto, Barbara;
Del Puppo, Francesca;
Inoue, Susumu;
Longo, Francesco;
Moretti, Elena;
Nava, Lara;
Patricelli, Barbara;
Stamerra, Antonio
Submitted: 2019-09-09
The first two LIGO and Virgo observation runs have been important milestones
in the gravitational wave (GW) field, thanks to the detection of GW signals
from ten binary black hole systems and a binary neutron star system. In order
to fully characterize the emitting source, the remnant object and its
environment, electromagnetic follow-up observations at different wavelengths
are essential, as learned from the GW170817/GRB170817A case. Given the quite
large localization uncertainties provided by interferometers, the main
challenge faced by facilities with a narrow field of view (e.g. Imaging
Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes, IACTs) is to setup a suitable follow-up
strategy in order to observe sky regions with the highest probability to host
the electromagnetic (EM) counterpart of the GW signal. As member of the EM
follow-up community, the MAGIC collaboration joined this effort in 2014. As the
third observation run (O3) is currently ongoing, where both LIGO and Virgo are
expected to have much better sensitivities, MAGIC is refining its follow-up
strategy to maximize the chances of observing the EM counterparts as soon as
possible. In this contribution we will describe this strategy, focusing on the
different observation cases, which mainly depends on the information available
from both GW and EM partner facilities.
