Normalized to: Del Pulgar, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07251 [pdf] - 2113441
Observation of inverse Compton emission from a long $\gamma$-ray burst
Acciari, V. A.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Engels, A. Arbet;
Baack, D.;
Babić, A.;
Banerjee, B.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
González, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bellizzi, L.;
Bernardini, E.;
Berti, A.;
Besenrieder, J.;
Bhattacharyya, W.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bošnjak, Ž.;
Busetto, G.;
Carosi, R.;
Ceribella, G.;
Chai, Y.;
Chilingaryan, A.;
Cikota, S.;
Colak, S. M.;
Colin, U.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
D'Elia, V.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Lotto, B.;
Delfino, M.;
Delgado, J.;
Depaoli, D.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Espiñeira, E. Do Souto;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Donini, A.;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Ramazani, V. Fallah;
Fattorini, A.;
Ferrara, G.;
Fidalgo, D.;
Foffano, L.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Fruck, C.;
Fukami, S.;
López, R. J. García;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gasparyan, S.;
Gaug, M.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Godinović, N.;
Green, D.;
Guberman, D.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hahn, A.;
Herrera, J.;
Hoang, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Hütten, M.;
Inada, T.;
Inoue, S.;
Ishio, K.;
Iwamura, Y.;
Jouvin, L.;
Kerszberg, D.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
Lamastra, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Leone, F.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
López-Oramas, A.;
Loporchio, S.;
Fraga, B. Machado de Oliveira;
Maggio, C.;
Majumdar, P.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martínez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Mićanović, S.;
Miceli, D.;
Minev, M.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Molina, E.;
Moralejo, A.;
Morcuende, D.;
Moreno, V.;
Moretti, E.;
Munar-Adrover, P.;
Neustroev, V.;
Nigro, C.;
Nilsson, K.;
Ninci, D.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogués, L.;
Nozaki, S.;
Paiano, S.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Peñil, P.;
Peresano, M.;
Persic, M.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Righi, C.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Saha, L.;
Sahakyan, N.;
Saito, T.;
Sakurai, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Schmidt, K.;
Schweizer, T.;
Sitarek, J.;
Šnidarić, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Somero, A.;
Stamerra, A.;
Strom, D.;
Strzys, M.;
Suda, Y.;
Surić, T.;
Takahashi, M.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzić, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Torres-Albà, N.;
Tosti, L.;
Vagelli, V.;
van Scherpenberg, J.;
Vanzo, G.;
Acosta, M. Vazquez;
Vigorito, C. F.;
Vitale, V.;
Vovk, I.;
Will, M.;
Zarić, D.;
Nava, L.;
Veres, P.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Hamburg, R.;
Hui, C. M.;
Mailyan, B.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Kocevski, D.;
Arimoto, M.;
Tak, D.;
Asano, K.;
Axelsson, M.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Dirirsa, F. Fana;
Gill, R.;
Granot, J.;
McEnery, J.;
Razzaque, S.;
Piron, F.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Campana, S.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Kuin, N. P. M.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
O'Brien, P.;
Capalbi, M.;
D'Aì, A.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Gropp, J.;
Klingler, N.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Perri, M.;
Starling, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tohuvavohu, A.;
Ursi, A.;
Tavani, M.;
Cardillo, M.;
Casentini, C.;
Piano, G.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Verrecchia, F.;
Pittori, C.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Parmiggiani, N.;
Anderson, G. E.;
Anderson, J. P.;
Bernardi, G.;
Bolmer, J.;
Caballero-García, M. D.;
Carrasco, I. M.;
Castellón, A.;
Segura, N. Castro;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Cherukuri, S. V.;
Cockeram, A. M.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Di Dato, A.;
Diretse, R.;
Fender, R. P.;
Fernández-García, E.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Greiner, J.;
Gromadzki, M.;
Heintz, K. E.;
Heywood, I.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hu, Y. -D.;
Inserra, C.;
Izzo, L.;
Jaiswal, V.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Japelj, J.;
Kankare, E.;
Kann, D. A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Klose, S.;
Levan, A. J.;
Li, X. Y.;
Lotti, S.;
Maguire, K.;
Malesani, D. B.;
Manulis, I.;
Marongiu, M.;
Martin, S.;
Melandri, A.;
Michałowski, M.;
Miller-Jones, J. C. A.;
Misra, K.;
Moin, A.;
Mooley, K. P.;
Nasri, S.;
Nicholl, M.;
Noschese, A.;
Novara, G.;
Pandey, S. B.;
Peretti, E.;
del Pulgar, C. J. Pérez;
Pérez-Torres, M. A.;
Perley, D. A.;
Piro, L.;
Ragosta, F.;
Resmi, L.;
Ricci, R.;
Rossi, A.;
Sánchez-Ramírez, R.;
Selsing, J.;
Schulze, S.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Smith, I. A.;
Sokolov, V. V.;
Stevens, J.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Thóne, C. C.;
Tiengo, A.;
Tremou, E.;
Troja, E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Vergani, S. D.;
Wieringa, M.;
Woudt, P. A.;
Xu, D.;
Yaron, O.;
Young, D. R.
Submitted: 2020-06-12
Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) originate from ultra-relativistic jets
launched from the collapsing cores of dying massive stars. They are
characterised by an initial phase of bright and highly variable radiation in
the keV-MeV band that is likely produced within the jet and lasts from
milliseconds to minutes, known as the prompt emission. Subsequently, the
interaction of the jet with the external medium generates external shock waves,
responsible for the afterglow emission, which lasts from days to months, and
occurs over a broad energy range, from the radio to the GeV bands. The
afterglow emission is generally well explained as synchrotron radiation by
electrons accelerated at the external shock. Recently, an intense, long-lasting
emission between 0.2 and 1 TeV was observed from the GRB 190114C. Here we
present the results of our multi-frequency observational campaign of
GRB~190114C, and study the evolution in time of the GRB emission across 17
orders of magnitude in energy, from $5\times10^{-6}$ up to $10^{12}$\,eV. We
find that the broadband spectral energy distribution is double-peaked, with the
TeV emission constituting a distinct spectral component that has power
comparable to the synchrotron component. This component is associated with the
afterglow, and is satisfactorily explained by inverse Compton upscattering of
synchrotron photons by high-energy electrons. We find that the conditions
required to account for the observed TeV component are not atypical, supporting
the possibility that inverse Compton emission is commonly produced in GRBs.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.0283 [pdf] - 1091336
Panchromatic observations of the textbook GRB 110205A: constraining
physical mechanisms of prompt emission and afterglow
Zheng, W.;
Shen, R. F.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Wu, X. F.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Urata, Y.;
Sugita, S.;
Zhang, B.;
Pozanenko, A.;
Nissinen, M.;
Sahu, D. K.;
Im, M.;
Ukwatta, T. N.;
Andreev, M.;
Klunko, E.;
Volnova, A.;
Akerlof, C. W.;
Anto, P.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Breeveld, A.;
Carsenty, U.;
Castillo-Carri'on, S.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Chester, M. M.;
Chuang, C. J.;
Cunniffe, R.;
Postigo, A. De Ugarte;
Duffard, R.;
Flewelling, H.;
Gehrels, N.;
Guver, T.;
Guziy, S.;
Hentunen, V. P.;
Huang, K. Y.;
Jelínek, M.;
Koch, T. S.;
Kub'anek, P.;
Kuin, P.;
McKay, T. A.;
Mottola, S.;
Oates, S. R.;
O'Brien, P.;
Page, M. J.;
Pandey, S. B.;
del Pulgar, C. Perez;
Rujopakarn, W.;
Rykoff, E.;
Salmi, T.;
S'anchez-Ramírez, R.;
Schaefer, B. E.;
Sergeev, A.;
Sonbas, E.;
Sota, A.;
Tello, J. C.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Yost, S. A.;
Yuan, F.
Submitted: 2011-11-01, last modified: 2012-03-22
We present a comprehensive analysis of a bright, long duration (T90 ~ 257 s)
GRB 110205A at redshift z= 2.22. The optical prompt emission was detected by
Swift/UVOT, ROTSE-IIIb and BOOTES telescopes when the GRB was still radiating
in the gamma-ray band. Nearly 200 s of observations were obtained
simultaneously from optical, X-ray to gamma-ray, which makes it one of the
exceptional cases to study the broadband spectral energy distribution across 6
orders of magnitude in energy during the prompt emission phase. By fitting the
time resolved prompt spectra, we clearly identify, for the first time, an
interesting two-break energy spectrum, roughly consistent with the standard GRB
synchrotron emission model in the fast cooling regime. Although the prompt
optical emission is brighter than the extrapolation of the best fit X/gamma-ray
spectra, it traces the gamma-ray light curve shape, suggesting a relation to
the prompt high energy emission. The synchrotron + SSC scenario is disfavored
by the data, but the models invoking a pair of internal shocks or having two
emission regions can interpret the data well. Shortly after prompt emission (~
1100 s), a bright (R = 14.0) optical emission hump with very steep rise (alpha
~ 5.5) was observed which we interpret as the emission from the reverse shock.
It is the first time that the rising phase of a reverse shock component has
been closely observed. The full optical and X-ray afterglow lightcurves can be
interpreted within the standard reverse shock (RS) + forward shock (FS) model.
In general, the high quality prompt emission and afterglow data allow us to
apply the standard fireball shock model to extract valuable information about
the GRB including the radiation mechanism, radius of prompt emission R, initial
Lorentz factor of the outflow, the composition of the ejecta, as well as the
collimation angle and the total energy budget.