Normalized to: De Villiers, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.06212 [pdf] - 2030696
The 1.28 GHz MeerKAT DEEP2 Image
Mauch, T.;
Cotton, W. D.;
Condon, J. J.;
Matthews, A. M.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Adam, R. M.;
Aldera, M. A.;
Asad, K. M. B.;
Bauermeister, E. F.;
Bennett, T. G. H.;
Bester, H.;
Botha, D. H.;
Brederode, L. R. S.;
Brits, Z. B.;
Buchner, S. J.;
Burger, J. P.;
Camilo, F.;
Chalmers, J. M.;
Cheetham, T.;
de Villiers, D.;
de Villiers, M. S.;
Dikgale-Mahlakoana, M. A.;
Toit, L. J. du;
Esterhuyse, S. W. P.;
Fadana, G.;
Fanaroff, B. L.;
Fataar, S.;
February, S.;
Frank, B. S.;
Gamatham, R. R. G.;
Geyer, M.;
Goedhart, S.;
Gounden, S.;
Gumede, S. C.;
Heywood, I.;
Hlakola, M. J.;
Horrell, J. M. G.;
Hugo, B.;
Isaacson, A. R.;
Józsa, G. I. G.;
Jonas, J. L.;
Julie, R. P. M.;
Kapp, F. B.;
Kasper, V. A.;
Kenyon, J. S.;
Kotzé, P. P. A.;
Kriek, N.;
Kriel, H.;
Kusel, T. W.;
Lehmensiek, R.;
Loots, A.;
Lord, R. T.;
Lunsky, B. M.;
Madisa, K.;
Magnus, L. G.;
Main, J. P. L.;
Malan, J. A.;
Manley, J. R.;
Marais, S. J.;
Martens, A.;
Merry, B.;
Millenaar, R.;
Mnyandu, N.;
Moeng, I. P. T.;
Mokone, O. J.;
Monama, T. E.;
Mphego, M. C.;
New, W. S.;
Ngcebetsha, B.;
Ngoasheng, K. J.;
Ockards, M. T. O.;
Oozeer, N.;
Otto, A. J.;
Patel, A. A.;
Peens-Hough, A.;
Perkins, S. J.;
Ramaila, A. J. T.;
Ramudzuli, Z. R.;
Renil, R.;
Richter, L. L.;
Robyntjies, A.;
Salie, S.;
Schollar, C. T. G.;
Schwardt, L. C.;
Serylak, M.;
Siebrits, R.;
Sirothia, S. K.;
Smirnov, O. M.;
Sofeya, L.;
Stone, G.;
Taljaard, B.;
Tasse, C.;
Theron, I. P.;
Tiplady, A. J.;
Toruvanda, O.;
Twum, S. N.;
van Balla, T. J.;
van der Byl, A.;
van der Merwe, C.;
Van Tonder, V.;
Wallace, B. H.;
Welz, M. G.;
Williams, L. P.;
Xaia, B.
Submitted: 2019-12-12
We present the confusion-limited 1.28 GHz MeerKAT DEEP2 image covering one
$\approx 68'$ FWHM primary beam area with $7.6''$ FWHM resolution and $0.55 \pm
0.01$ $\mu$Jy/beam rms noise. Its J2000 center position $\alpha=04^h 13^m
26.4^s$, $\delta=-80^\circ 00' 00''$ was selected to minimize artifacts caused
by bright sources. We introduce the new 64-element MeerKAT array and describe
commissioning observations to measure the primary beam attenuation pattern,
estimate telescope pointing errors, and pinpoint $(u,v)$ coordinate errors
caused by offsets in frequency or time. We constructed a 1.4 GHz differential
source count by combining a power-law count fit to the DEEP2 confusion $P(D)$
distribution from $0.25$ to $10$ $\mu$Jy with counts of individual DEEP2
sources between $10$ $\mu$Jy and $2.5$ mJy. Most sources fainter than $S \sim
100$ $\mu$Jy are distant star-forming galaxies obeying the FIR/radio
correlation, and sources stronger than $0.25$ $\mu$Jy account for $\sim93\%$ of
the radio background produced by star-forming galaxies. For the first time, the
DEEP2 source count has reached the depth needed to reveal the majority of the
star formation history of the universe. A pure luminosity evolution of the 1.4
GHz local luminosity function consistent with the Madau & Dickinson (2014)
model for the evolution of star-forming galaxies based on UV and infrared data
underpredicts our 1.4 GHz source count in the range $-5 \lesssim
\log[S(\mathrm{Jy})] \lesssim -4$.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.02486 [pdf] - 1851740
Primary beam effects of radio astronomy antennas: I. Modelling the Karl
G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) L-band beam using holography
Submitted: 2019-03-06
Modern interferometric imaging relies on advanced calibration that
incorporates direction-dependent effects. Their increasing number of antennas
(e.g. in LOFAR, VLA, MeerKAT/SKA) and sensitivity are often tempered with the
accuracy of their calibration. Beam accuracy drives particularly the capability
for high dynamic range imaging (HDR - contrast > 1:$10^6$). The Radio
Interferometric Measurement Equation (RIME) proposes a refined calibration
framework for wide field of views (i.e. beyond the primary lobe and first null)
using beam models. We have used holography data taken on 12 antennas of the
Very Large Array (VLA) with two different approaches: a `data-driven'
representation derived from Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a projection
on the Zernike polynomials. We determined sparse representations of the beam to
encode its spatial and spectral variations. For each approach, we compressed
the spatial and spectral distribution of coefficients using low-rank
approximations. The spectral behaviour was encoded with a Discrete Cosine
Transform (DCT). We compared our modelling to that of the Cassbeam software
which provides a parametric model of the antenna and its radiated field. We
present comparisons of the beam reconstruction fidelity vs. `compressibility'.
We found that the PCA method provides the most accurate model. In the case of
VLA antennas, we discuss the frequency ripple over L-band which is associated
with a standing wave between antenna reflectors. The results are a series of
coefficients that can easily be used `on-the-fly' in calibration pipelines to
generate accurate beams at low computing costs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.00906 [pdf] - 1811301
The Expanded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope
Patra, N. N.;
Kanekar, N.;
Chengalur, J. N.;
Sharma, R.;
de Villiers, M.;
Kumar, B. Ajit;
Bhattacharyya, B.;
Bhalerao, V.;
Bombale, R.;
Buch, K. D.;
Dixit, B.;
Ghalame, A.;
Gupta, Y.;
Hande, P.;
Hande, S.;
Hariharan, K.;
Kale, R.;
Lokhande, S.;
Phakatkar, S.;
Prajapati, A.;
Rai, S. K.;
Raybole, P.;
Roy, J.;
Shaikh, A. K.;
Sureshkumar, S.
Submitted: 2019-01-03
With 30 antennas and a maximum baseline length of 25 km, the Giant Metrewave
Radio Telescope (GMRT) is the premier low-frequency radio interferometer today.
We have carried out a study of possible expansions of the GMRT, via adding new
antennas and installing focal plane arrays (FPAs), to improve its point-source
sensitivity, surface brightness sensitivity, angular resolution, field of view,
and U-V coverage. We have carried out array configuration studies, aimed at
minimizing the number of new GMRT antennas required to obtain a well-behaved
synthesized beam over a wide range of angular resolutions for full-synthesis
observations. This was done via two approaches, tomographic projection and
random sampling, to identify the optimal locations for the new antennas. We
report results for the optimal locations of the antennas of an expanded array
(the "EGMRT"), consisting of the existing 30 GMRT antennas, 30 new antennas at
short distances, $\leq 2.5$ km from the array centre, and 26 new antennas at
long distances, $\approx 5-25$ km from the array centre. The collecting area
and the field of view of the proposed EGMRT array would be larger by factors
of, respectively, $\approx 3$ and $\approx 30$, than those of the GMRT. Indeed,
the EGMRT continuum sensitivity and survey speed with 550-850 MHz FPAs
installed on the 45 antennas within a distance of $\approx 2.5$ km of the array
centre would be far better than those of any existing interferometer, and
comparable to the sensitivity and survey speed of Phase-1 of the Square
Kilometre Array.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.01933 [pdf] - 1661346
Revival of the magnetar PSR J1622-4950: observations with MeerKAT,
Parkes, XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and NuSTAR
Camilo, F.;
Scholz, P.;
Serylak, M.;
Buchner, S.;
Merryfield, M.;
Kaspi, V. M.;
Archibald, R. F.;
Bailes, M.;
Jameson, A.;
van Straten, W.;
Sarkissian, J.;
Reynolds, J. E.;
Johnston, S.;
Hobbs, G.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Adam, R. M.;
Adams, G. B.;
Alberts, T.;
Andreas, R.;
Asad, K. M. B.;
Baker, D. E.;
Baloyi, T.;
Bauermeister, E. F.;
Baxana, T.;
Bennett, T. G. H.;
Bernardi, G.;
Booisen, D.;
Booth, R. S.;
Botha, D. H.;
Boyana, L.;
Brederode, L. R. S.;
Burger, J. P.;
Cheetham, T.;
Conradie, J.;
Conradie, J. P.;
Davidson, D. B.;
de Bruin, G.;
de Swardt, B.;
de Villiers, C.;
de Villiers, D. I. L.;
de Villiers, M. S.;
de Villiers, W.;
de Waal, C.;
Dikgale, M. A.;
Toit, G. du;
Toit, L. J. du;
Esterhuyse, S. W. P.;
Fanaroff, B.;
Fataar, S.;
Foley, A. R.;
Foster, G.;
Fourie, D.;
Gamatham, R.;
Gatsi, T.;
Geschke, R.;
Goedhart, S.;
Grobler, T. L.;
Gumede, S. C.;
Hlakola, M. J.;
Hokwana, A.;
Hoorn, D. H.;
Horn, D.;
Horrell, J.;
Hugo, B.;
Isaacson, A.;
Jacobs, O.;
van Rensburg, J. P. Jansen;
Jonas, J. L.;
Jordaan, B.;
Joubert, A.;
Joubert, F.;
Jozsa, G. I. G.;
Julie, R.;
Julius, C. C.;
Kapp, F.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Karels, F.;
Kariseb, M.;
Karuppusamy, R.;
Kasper, V.;
Knox-Davies, E. C.;
Koch, D.;
Kotze, P. P. A.;
Krebs, A.;
Kriek, N.;
Kriel, H.;
Kusel, T.;
Lamoor, S.;
Lehmensiek, R.;
Liebenberg, D.;
Liebenberg, I.;
Lord, R. T.;
Lunsky, B.;
Mabombo, N.;
Macdonald, T.;
Macfarlane, P.;
Madisa, K.;
Mafhungo, L.;
Magnus, L. G.;
Magozore, C.;
Mahgoub, O.;
Main, J. P. L.;
Makhathini, S.;
Malan, J. A.;
Malgas, P.;
Manley, J. R.;
Manzini, M.;
Marais, L.;
Marais, N.;
Marais, S. J.;
Maree, M.;
Martens, A.;
Matshawule, S. D.;
Matthysen, N.;
Mauch, T.;
Nally, L. D. Mc;
Merry, B.;
Millenaar, R. P.;
Mjikelo, C.;
Mkhabela, N.;
Mnyandu, N.;
Moeng, I. T.;
Mokone, O. J.;
Monama, T. E.;
Montshiwa, K.;
Moss, V.;
Mphego, M.;
New, W.;
Ngcebetsha, B.;
Ngoasheng, K.;
Niehaus, H.;
Ntuli, P.;
Nzama, A.;
Obies, F.;
Obrocka, M.;
Ockards, M. T.;
Olyn, C.;
Oozeer, N.;
Otto, A. J.;
Padayachee, Y.;
Passmoor, S.;
Patel, A. A.;
Paula, S.;
Peens-Hough, A.;
Pholoholo, B.;
Prozesky, P.;
Rakoma, S.;
Ramaila, A. J. T.;
Rammala, I.;
Ramudzuli, Z. R.;
Rasivhaga, M.;
Ratcliffe, S.;
Reader, H. C.;
Renil, R.;
Richter, L.;
Robyntjies, A.;
Rosekrans, D.;
Rust, A.;
Salie, S.;
Sambu, N.;
Schollar, C. T. G.;
Schwardt, L.;
Seranyane, S.;
Sethosa, G.;
Sharpe, C.;
Siebrits, R.;
Sirothia, S. K.;
Slabber, M. J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Smith, S.;
Sofeya, L.;
Songqumase, N.;
Spann, R.;
Stappers, B.;
Steyn, D.;
Steyn, T. J.;
Strong, R.;
Struthers, A.;
Stuart, C.;
Sunnylall, P.;
Swart, P. S.;
Taljaard, B.;
Tasse, C.;
Taylor, G.;
Theron, I. P.;
Thondikulam, V.;
Thorat, K.;
Tiplady, A.;
Toruvanda, O.;
van Aardt, J.;
van Balla, T.;
Heever, L. van den;
van der Byl, A.;
van der Merwe, C.;
van der Merwe, P.;
van Niekerk, P. C.;
van Rooyen, R.;
van Staden, J. P.;
van Tonder, V.;
van Wyk, R.;
Wait, I.;
Walker, A. L.;
Wallace, B.;
Welz, M.;
Williams, L. P.;
Xaia, B.;
Young, N.;
Zitha, S.
Submitted: 2018-04-05
New radio (MeerKAT and Parkes) and X-ray (XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and
NuSTAR) observations of PSR J1622-4950 indicate that the magnetar, in a
quiescent state since at least early 2015, reactivated between 2017 March 19
and April 5. The radio flux density, while variable, is approximately 100x
larger than during its dormant state. The X-ray flux one month after
reactivation was at least 800x larger than during quiescence, and has been
decaying exponentially on a 111+/-19 day timescale. This high-flux state,
together with a radio-derived rotational ephemeris, enabled for the first time
the detection of X-ray pulsations for this magnetar. At 5%, the 0.3-6 keV
pulsed fraction is comparable to the smallest observed for magnetars. The
overall pulsar geometry inferred from polarized radio emission appears to be
broadly consistent with that determined 6-8 years earlier. However, rotating
vector model fits suggest that we are now seeing radio emission from a
different location in the magnetosphere than previously. This indicates a novel
way in which radio emission from magnetars can differ from that of ordinary
pulsars. The torque on the neutron star is varying rapidly and unsteadily, as
is common for magnetars following outburst, having changed by a factor of 7
within six months of reactivation.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.02929 [pdf] - 1422404
Engineering and Science Highlights of the KAT-7 Radio Telescope
Foley, A. R.;
Alberts, T.;
Armstrong, R P.;
Barta, A.;
Bauermeister, E. F.;
Bester, H.;
Blose, S.;
Booth, R. S.;
Botha, D. H.;
Buchner, S. J.;
Carignan, C.;
Cheetham, T.;
Cloete, K.;
Coreejes, G.;
Crida, R. C.;
Cross, S. D.;
Curtolo, F.;
Dikgale, A.;
de Villiers, M. S.;
Toit, L. J. du;
Esterhuyse, S. W. P.;
Fanaroff, B.;
Fender, R. P.;
Fijalkowski, M.;
Fourie, D.;
Frank, B.;
George, D.;
Gibbs, P.;
Goedhart, S.;
Grobbelaar, J.;
Gumede, S. C.;
Herselman, P.;
Hess, K. M.;
Hoek, N.;
Horrell, J.;
Jonas, J. L.;
Jordaan, J. D. B.;
Julie, R.;
Kapp, F.;
Kotzé, P.;
Kusel, T.;
Langman, A.;
Lehmensiek, R.;
Liebenberg, D.;
Liebenberg, I. J. V.;
Loots, A.;
Lord, R. T.;
Lucero, D. M.;
Ludick, J.;
Macfarlane, P.;
Madlavana, M.;
Magnus, L.;
Magozore, C.;
Malan, J. A.;
Manley, J. R.;
Marais, L.;
Marais, N.;
Marais, S. J.;
Maree, M.;
Martens, A.;
Mokone, O.;
Moss, V.;
Mthembu, S.;
New, W.;
Nicholson, G. D.;
van Niekerk, P. C.;
Oozeer, N.;
Passmoor, S. S.;
Peens-Hough, A.;
Pińska, A. B.;
Prozesky, P.;
Rajan, S.;
Ratcliffe, S.;
Renil, R.;
Richter, L. L.;
Rosekrans, D.;
Rust, A.;
Schröder, A. C.;
Schwardt, L. C.;
Seranyane, S.;
Serylak, M.;
Shepherd, D. S.;
Siebrits, R.;
Sofeya, L.;
Spann, R.;
Springbok, R.;
Swart, P. S.;
Thondikulam, Venkatasubramani L.;
Theron, I. P.;
Tiplady, A.;
Toruvanda, O.;
Tshongweni, S.;
Heever, L. van den;
van der Merwe, C.;
van Rooyen, R.;
Wakhaba, S.;
Walker, A. L.;
Welz, M.;
Williams, L.;
Wolleben, M.;
Woudt, P. A.;
Young, N. J.;
Zwart, J. T. L.
Submitted: 2016-06-09
The construction of the KAT-7 array in the Karoo region of the Northern Cape
in South Africa was intended primarily as an engineering prototype for
technologies and techniques applicable to the MeerKAT telescope. This paper
looks at the main engineering and scien- tific highlights from this effort, and
discusses their applicability to both MeerKAT and other next-generation radio
telescopes. In particular we found that the composite dish surface works well,
but it becomes complicated to fabricate for a dish lacking circular symmetry;
the Stir- ling cycle cryogenic system with ion pump to achieve vacuum works but
demands much higher maintenance than an equivalent Gifford-McMahon cycle
system; the ROACH (Recon- figurable Open Architecture Computing Hardware)-based
correlator with SPEAD (Stream- ing Protocol for Exchanging Astronomical Data)
protocol data transfer works very well and KATCP (Karoo Array Telescope Control
Protocol) control protocol has proven very flexible and convenient. KAT-7 has
also been used for scientific observations where it has a niche in mapping low
surface-brightness continuum sources, some extended HI halos and OH masers in
star-forming regions. It can also be used to monitor continuum source
variability, observe pulsars, and make VLBI observations