Normalized to: De Ugarte-Postigo, A.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.07134 [pdf] - 940413
Numerical Models of Blackbody-Dominated GRBs
Submitted: 2015-02-25
Blackbody-dominated (BBD) gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are events characterized by
the absence of a typical afterglow, long durations and the presence of a
significant thermal component following the prompt gamma-ray emission. GRB
101225A (the `Christmas burst') is a prototype of this class. A plausible
progenitor system for it, and for the BBD-GRBs, is the merger of a neutron star
(NS) and a helium core of an evolved, massive star. Using relativistic
hydrodynamic simulations we model the propagation of an ultrarelativistic jet
through the enviroment created by such a merger and we compute the whole
radiative signature, both thermal and non-thermal, of the jet dynamical
evolution. We find that the thermal emission originates from the interaction
between the jet and the hydrogen envelope ejected during the NS/He merger.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.1814 [pdf] - 1216186
Numerical models of blackbody-dominated gamma-ray bursts -- II. Emission
properties
Submitted: 2014-08-08, last modified: 2014-10-29
Blackbody-dominated (BBD) gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are events characterized by
long durations and the presence of a significant thermal component following
the prompt emission, as well as by the absence of a typical afterglow. GRB
101225A is the most prominent member of this class. A plausible progenitor
system for it and for BBD-GRBs is the merger a neutron star and a helium core
of an evolved, massive star. Using relativistic hydrodynamic simulations we
model the propagation of ultrarelativistic jets through the environments
created by such mergers. In a previous paper we showed that the thermal
emission in BBD-GRBs is linked to the interaction of an ultrarelativistic jet
with the ejected envelope of the secondary star of the binary. Here we focus on
explaining the emission properties of BBD-GRBs computing the whole radiative
signature (both thermal and non-thermal) of the jet dynamical evolution. The
non-thermal emission of the forward shock of the jet is dominant during the
early phases of the evolution, when that shock is moderately relativistic. Our
models do not produce a classical afterglow because the quick deceleration of
the jet results primarily from the mass entrainment in the beam, and not from
the process of plowing mass from the external medium in front of the GRB
ejecta. The contribution of the reverse shock is of the same magnitude than
that of the forward shock during the first 80 min after the GRB. Later, it
quickly fades because the jet/environment interaction chocks the
ultrarelativistic jet beam and effectively dumps the reverse shock. In
agreement with observations, we obtain rather flat light curves during the
first 2 d after the GRB, and a spectral evolution consistent with the observed
reddening of the system.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1005.3029 [pdf] - 1032537
Discovery of a new Soft Gamma Repeater, SGR J1833-0832
Gogus, E.;
Cusumano, G.;
Levan, A. J.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Campana, S.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Stappers, B. W.;
de Ugarte-Postigo, A.;
Strohmayer, T.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Gelbord, J.;
Burrows, D. N.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Munoz-Darias, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Hessels, J. W. T.;
Kamble, A. P.;
Wachter, S.;
Wiersema, K.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Woods, P. M.
Submitted: 2010-05-17, last modified: 2010-07-24
On 2010 March 19, the Swift/Burst Alert Telescope triggered on a short burst
with temporal and spectral characteristics similar to those of Soft Gamma
Repeater (SGR) bursts. The source location, however, did not coincide with any
known SGR. Subsequent observations of the source error box with the Swift/X-ray
Telescope and the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) led to the discovery of a
new X-ray source, with a spin period of 7.56 s, confirming SGR J1833-0832 as a
new magnetar. Based on our detailed temporal and spectral analyses, we show
that the new SGR is rapidly spinning down (4 x 10^{-12} s/s) and find an
inferred dipole magnetic field of 1.8 x 10^{14} G. We also show that the X-ray
flux of SGR J1833-0832 remained constant for approximately 20 days following
the burst and then started to decline. We derived an accurate location of the
source with the Chandra X-ray Observatory and we searched for a counterpart in
deep optical and infrared observations of SGR J1833-0832, and for radio pulsed
emission with the Westerbork Radio Synthesis Telescope. Finally, we compare the
spectral and temporal properties of the source to the other magnetar
candidates.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.3665 [pdf] - 1941763
MAGIC observation of the GRB080430 afterglow
MAGIC Collaboration;
Aleksić, J.;
Anderhub, H.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Antoranz, P.;
Backes, M.;
Baixeras, C.;
Balestra, S.;
Barrio, J. A.;
Bastieri, D.;
González, J. Becerra;
Becker, J. K.;
Bednarek, W.;
Berdyugin, A.;
Berger, K.;
Bernardini, E.;
Biland, A.;
Bock, R. K.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bordas, P.;
Tridon, D. Borla;
Bosch-Ramon, V.;
Bose, D.;
Braun, I.;
Bretz, T.;
Britzger, D.;
Camara, M.;
Carmona, E.;
Carosi, A.;
Colin, P.;
Commichau, S.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Costado, M. T.;
Covino, S.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
del Pozo, E. de Cea;
Reyes, R. De los;
De Lotto, B.;
De Maria, M.;
De Sabata, F.;
Mendez, C. Delgado;
Doert, M.;
Domínguez, A.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Errando, M.;
Ferenc, D.;
Fernández, E.;
Firpo, R.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Galante, N.;
López, R. J. García;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gaug, M.;
Godinovic, N.;
Goebel, F.;
Hadasch, D.;
Herrero, A.;
Hildebrand, D.;
Höhne-Mönch, D.;
Hose, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Hsu, C. C.;
Jogler, T.;
Klepser, S.;
Krähenbühl, T.;
Kranich, D.;
La Barbera, A.;
Laille, A.;
Leonardo, E.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, E.;
Majumdar, P.;
Maneva, G.;
Mankuzhiyil, N.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martínez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Meucci, M.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Miyamoto, H.;
Moldón, J.;
Moles, M.;
Moralejo, A.;
Nieto, D.;
Nilsson, K.;
Ninkovic, J.;
Orito, R.;
Oya, I.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Pasanen, M.;
Pascoli, D.;
Pauss, F.;
Pegna, R. G.;
Perez-Torres, M. A.;
Persic, M.;
Peruzzo, L.;
Prada, F.;
Prandini, E.;
Puchades, N.;
Puljak, I.;
Reichardt, I.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Rissi, M.;
Rügamer, S.;
Saggion, A.;
Saito, T. Y.;
Salvati, M.;
Sánchez-Conde, M.;
Satalecka, K.;
Scalzotto, V.;
Scapin, V.;
Schweizer, T.;
Shayduk, M.;
Shore, S. N.;
Sierpowska-Bartosik, A.;
Sillanpää, A.;
Sitarek, J.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Spanier, F.;
Spiro, S.;
Stamerra, A.;
Steinke, B.;
Strah, N.;
Struebig, J. C.;
Suric, T.;
Takalo, L.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Tescaro, D.;
Teshima, M.;
Torres, D. F.;
Turini, N.;
Vankov, H.;
Wagner, R. M.;
Zabalza, V.;
Zandanel, F.;
Zanin, R.;
Zapatero, J.;
de Ugarte-Postigo, A.
Submitted: 2010-04-21, last modified: 2010-04-23
Context: Gamma-ray bursts are cosmological sources emitting radiation from
the gamma-rays to the radio band. Substantial observational efforts have been
devoted to the study of gamma-ray bursts during the prompt phase, i.e. the
initial burst of high-energy radiation, and during the long-lasting afterglows.
In spite of many successes in interpreting these phenomena, there are still
several open key questions about the fundamental emission processes, their
energetics and the environment. Aim: Independently of specific gamma-ray burst
theoretical recipes, spectra in the GeV/TeV range are predicted to be
remarkably simple, being satisfactorily modeled with power-laws, and therefore
offer a very valuable tool to probe the extragalactic background light
distribution. Furthermore, the simple detection of a component at very-high
energies, i.e. at $\sim 100$\,GeV, would solve the ambiguity about the
importance of various possible emission processes, which provide barely
distinguishable scenarios at lower energies. Methods: We used the results of
the MAGIC telescope observation of the moderate resdhift ($z\sim0.76$)
\object{GRB\,080430} at energies above about 80\,GeV, to evaluate the
perspective for late-afterglow observations with ground based GeV/TeV
telescopes. Results: We obtained an upper limit of $F_{\rm 95%\,CL} = 5.5
\times 10^{-11}$\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$ for the very-high energy emission of
\object{GRB\,080430}, which cannot set further constraints on the theoretical
scenarios proposed for this object also due to the difficulties in modeling the
low-energy afterglow. Nonetheless, our observations show that Cherenkov
telescopes have already reached the required sensitivity to detect the GeV/TeV
emission of GRBs at moderate redshift ($z \lesssim 0.8$), provided the
observations are carried out at early times, close to the onset of their
afterglow phase.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.0993 [pdf] - 26042
MAGIC observation of GRB080430
Covino, Stefano;
Garczarczyk, Markus;
Gaug, Markus;
Antonelli, Angelo;
Bastieri, Denis;
Becerra-Gonzalez, Josefa;
La Barbera, Antonio;
Carosi, Alessandro;
Galante, Nicola;
Longo, Francesco;
Scapin, Valeria;
Spiro, Susanna;
de Ugarte-Postigo, Antonio;
Galli, Alessandra;
Salvaterra, R.
Submitted: 2009-07-06
Gamma-ray bursts are cosmological sources emitting radiation from the
gamma-rays to the radio band. Substantial observational efforts have been
devoted to the study of GRBs during the prompt phase, i.e. the initial burst of
high-energy radiation, and during the longer-lasting afterglows. In spite of
many successes in interpreting these phenomena there are still several open key
questions about the fundamental emission processes, their energetics and the
environment. Moreover, independently of their modeling, GRB spectra are
remarkably simple, being satisfactorily fitted with power-laws, and therefore
offer a very valuable tool to probe the extragalactic background light
distribution affecting all high-energy observations of cosmological sources.
Observations carried out with Cherenkov telescopes, as MAGIC, can be
fundamental for all these scientific topics. GRB080430, being at a rather
moderate redshift, z~0.76, and well-studied in the optical, although observed
only a few hours after the high-energy event, is a good test case to evaluate
the perspective for late-afterglow observations with ground based GeV/TeV
observatories.
