Normalized to: De Rujula, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.09970 [pdf] - 1673672
Cannonball model diagnosis of the short gamma ray burst 170817A
Submitted: 2017-12-28, last modified: 2018-04-30
The rich and complex data obtained from multi-wavelength observations of
SHB170817A, the short hard gamma ray burst (SHB) associated with GW170817 --the
first neutron stars merger event detected in gravitational waves (GWs)-- are
analyzed in the framework of the cannonball model of SHBs. In this model a
highly relativistic jet is launched by fall back matter on the nascent neutron
star (or black hole) into a surrounding glory (light from the surrounding wind
nebula of the binary neutron stars) which was present already before the
merger. The SHB was produced by inverse Compton scattering of glory photons by
the jet, which was viewed far off-axis. The fading glory, which produced the
initial UVOIR afterglow, was powered by a neutron star remnant. It was
overtaken by a late time X-ray, UVOIR and radio afterglow produced by
synchrotron radiation from the decelerating jet in the interstellar medium of
the host galaxy. If the radio afterglow of SHB170817A was indeed produced by
the jet, it should display a superluminal motion relative to the SHB location,
still detectable in VLA and VLBI radio observations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.01985 [pdf] - 1494066
Hyperluminal Signatures in the Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts 980425 and
030329
Submitted: 2016-10-06, last modified: 2016-10-10
The late-time high-resolution X-ray and radio observations of
GRB980425/SN1998bw, the closest known gamma ray burst (GRB) associated with a
supernova (SN) explosion, may have actually resolved the hyperluminal source
that produced the GRB and its afterglow. Its hyperluminal speed ~350c is
consistent with that expected in the cannonball (CB) model of GRBs. The
observed superluminal expansion of the late-time radio image of
GRB030329/SN2003dh, the GRB with the brightest and longest followed up radio
afterglow to date, is also consistent with that expected in the CB model of
GRBs and extrapolates to an apparent early-time hyperluminal expansion.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.2672 [pdf] - 472507
Origin of the Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic Rays and their Spectral Break
Submitted: 2010-11-11, last modified: 2011-06-21
The energy spectrum, composition and arrival directions of ultrahigh energy
cosmic rays (UHECRs) with energy above the cosmic ray ankle, measured by the
Pierre Auger Observatory, are inconsistent if their origin is assumed to be
extragalactic. Their observed properties, however, are those expected from
UHECRs accelerated by the highly relativistic jets emitted in Galactic gamma
ray bursts, most of which are beamed away from Earth. If this alternative
interpretation is correct, the observed break in the energy spectrum of UHECRs
around 50 EeV is not the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin cutoff but the energy
threshold for free escape of ultrahigh energy iron cosmic rays from the Galaxy
and above their respective free-escape threshold-energies, UHECR nuclei should
point back to their Galactic sources or their remnants rather than to active
galactic nuclei (AGN) within the GZK horizon.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.4776 [pdf] - 900416
The diverse broad-band light-curves of Swift GRBs reproduced with the
cannonball model
Submitted: 2008-09-28, last modified: 2009-01-16
Two radiation mechanisms, inverse Compton scattering (ICS) and synchrotron
radiation (SR), suffice within the cannonball (CB) model of long gamma ray
bursts (LGRBs) and X-ray flashes (XRFs) to provide a very simple and accurate
description of their observed prompt emission and afterglows. Simple as they
are, the two mechanisms and the burst environment generate the rich structure
of the light curves at all frequencies and times. This is demonstrated for 33
selected Swift LGRBs and XRFs, which are well sampled from early until late
time and faithfully represent the entire diversity of the broad-band light
curves of Swift LGRBs and XRFs. Their prompt gamma-ray and X-ray emission is
dominated by ICS of `glory' light. During their fast decline phase, ICS is
taken over by SR, which dominates their broad-band afterglow. The pulse shape
and spectral evolution of the gamma-ray peaks and the early-time X-ray flares,
and even the delayed optical `humps' in XRFs, are correctly predicted. The
`canonical' and non-canonical X-ray light curves and the chromatic behaviour of
the broad-band afterglows are well reproduced. In particular, in canonical
X-ray light curves, the initial fast decline and rapid softening of the prompt
emission, the transition to the plateau phase, the subsequent gradual
steepening of the plateau to an asymptotic power-law decay, and the transition
from chromatic to achromatic behaviour of the light curves agrees well with
those predicted by the CB model. The Swift early-time data on XRF 060218 are
inconsistent with a black-body emission from a shock break-out through a
stellar envelope. Instead, they are well described by ICS of glory light by a
jet breaking out from SN2006aj.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0606199 [pdf] - 115313
A theory of Cosmic Rays
Submitted: 2006-06-19, last modified: 2008-05-07
We present a theory of non-solar cosmic rays (CRs) in which the bulk of their
observed flux is due to a single type of CR source at all energies. The total
luminosity of the Galaxy, the broken power-law spectra with their observed
slopes, the position of the `knee(s)' and `ankle', and the CR composition and
its variation with energy are all predicted in terms of very simple and
completely `standard' physics. The source of CRs is extremely `economical': it
has only one parameter to be fitted to the ensemble of all of the mentioned
data. All other inputs are `priors', that is, theoretical or observational
items of information independent of the properties of the source of CRs, and
chosen to lie in their pre-established ranges. The theory is part of a `unified
view of high-energy astrophysics' --based on the `Cannonball' model of the
relativistic ejecta of accreting black holes and neutron stars. The model has
been extremely successful in predicting all the novel properties of Gamma Ray
Bursts recently observed with help of the Swift satellite. If correct, this
model is only lacking a satisfactory theoretical understanding of the `cannon'
that emits the cannonballs in catastrophic processes of accretion.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.1527 [pdf] - 7951
'Jet breaks' and 'missing breaks' in the X-Ray afterglow of Gamma Ray
Bursts
Submitted: 2007-12-10, last modified: 2008-04-24
The X-ray afterglows (AGs) of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and X-Ray Flashes
(XRFs) have, after the fast decline phase of their prompt emission, a temporal
behaviour varying between two extremes. A large fraction of these AGs has a
'canonical' light curve which, after an initial shallow-decay 'plateau' phase,
'breaks smoothly' into a fast power-law decline. Very energetic GRBs,
contrariwise, appear not to have a 'break', their AG declines like a power-law
from the start of the observations. Breaks and 'missing breaks' are intimately
related to the geometry and deceleration of the jets responsible for GRBs. In
the frame of the 'cannonball' (CB) model of GRBs and XRFs, we analyze the cited
extreme behaviours (canonical and pure power-law) and intermediate cases
spanning the observed range of X-ray AG shapes. We show that the entire panoply
of X-ray light-curve shapes --measured with Swift and other satellites-- are as
anticipated, on very limpid grounds, by the CB model. We test the expected
correlations between the AG's shape and the peak- and isotropic energies of the
prompt radiation, strengthening a simple conclusion of the analysis of AG
shapes: in energetic GRBs the break is not truly 'missing', it is hidden under
the tail of the prompt emission, or it occurs too early to be recorded. We also
verify that the spectral index of the unabsorbed AGs and the temporal index of
their late power-law decline differ by half a unit, as predicted.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0804.0621 [pdf] - 11484
Is there anything special about GRB 080319B?
Submitted: 2008-04-04
We show that the properties of gamma ray burst 080319B and its afterglow are
well reproduced by the cannonball model of long gamma ray bursts (GRBs). It was
an ordinary GRB, produced by a jet of highly relativistic plasmoids (CBs),
ejected in a core-collapse supernova (SN) and viewed, as some others before,
particularly close to the CB-emission axis. It still remains to be seen whether
GRB 080319B was associated with an SN akin to SN1998bw, the SN type ordinarily
associated with GRBs, or with a much more luminous SN.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:0709.4307 [pdf] - 5408
The rapid decline of the prompt emission in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Submitted: 2007-09-27, last modified: 2008-01-26
Many gamma ray bursts (GRBs) have been observed with the Burst-Alert and
X-Ray telescopes of the Swift satellite. The successive `pulses' of these GRBs
end with a fast decline and a fast spectral softening, until they are overtaken
by another pulse, or the last pulse's decline is overtaken by a less
rapidly-varying `afterglow'. The fast decline-phase has been attributed, in the
currently-explored standard fireball model of GRBs, to `high-latitude'
synchrotron emission from a collision of two conical shells. This high latitude
emission does not explain the observed spectral softening. In contrast, the
temporal behaviour and the spectral evolution during the fast-decline phase
agree with the predictions of the cannonball model of GRBs.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:0801.0397 [pdf] - 8594
Interpreting the X-ray Flash XRF 060218 and its associated supernova
Submitted: 2008-01-02
Forty years after their discovery, and in spite of a very large body of
observations, the operation of the 'engine' responsible for long-duration
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and X-ray flashes --as well as the mechanisms
generating their radiation-- are still the subject of debate and study. In this
respect a recent event, XRF 060218, associated with SN 2006aj, is particularly
significant. It has been argued that, for the first time, the break-out of the
shock involved in the supernova explosion has been observed, thanks to the
detection of a thermal component in the event's radiation; that this XRF was
not a GRB seen 'off-axis', but a member of a new class of energetically feeble
GRBs; and that its 'continued engine activity' may have been driven by a
remnant highly-magnetized neutron star, a magnetar. I argue, on grounds based
on observations and on limpid verified hypothesis, that there is a common,
simpler alternative to these views, with no thermal component, no new feeble
GRBs, and no steady engine activity.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0611161 [pdf] - 260815
Long gamma-ray bursts without visible supernovae: a case study of
redshift estimators and alleged novel objects
Submitted: 2006-11-06, last modified: 2007-12-14
It has been argued that the observational limits on a supernova (SN)
associated with GRB060614 convincingly exclude a SN akin to SN1998bw as its
originator, and provide evidence for a new class of long-duration GRBs. We
discuss this issue in the contexts of indirect 'redshift estimators' and of the
fireball and cannonball models of GRBs. The latter explains the unusual
properties of GRB060614: at its debated but favoured low redshift (0.125) they
are predicted, as opposed to exceptional, if the associated core-collapse SN is
of a recently discovered, very faint type. We take the occasion to discuss the
'association' between GRBs and SNe.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.0970 [pdf] - 6769
An introduction to Cosmic Rays and Gamma-Ray Bursts, and to their simple
understanding
Submitted: 2007-11-06, last modified: 2007-11-12
I review the subjects of non-solar cosmic rays (CRs) and long-duration
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Of the various interpretations of these phenomena, the
one best supported by the data is the following. Accreting compact objects,
such as black holes, are seen to emit relativistic puffs of plasma:
`cannonballs' (CBs). The inner domain of a rotating star whose core has
collapsed resembles such an accreting system. This suggests that core-collapse
supernovae (SNe) emit CBs, as SN1987A did. The fate of a CB as it exits a SN
and travels in space can be studied as a function of the CB's mass and energy,
and of `ambient' properties: the encountered matter- and light- distributions,
the composition of the former, and the location of intelligent observers. The
latter may conclude that the interactions of CBs with ambient matter and light
generate CRs and GRBs, all of whose properties can be described by this `CB
model' with few parameters and simple physics. GRB data are still being taken
in unscrutinized domains of energy and timing. They agree accurately with the
model's predictions. CR data are centenary. Their precision will improve, but
new striking predictions are unlikely. Yet, a one-free-parameter description of
all CR data works very well. This is a bit as if one discovered QED today and
only needed to fit $\alpha$.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0703293 [pdf] - 90102
Gamma ray bursts, supernovae and metallicity in the intergalactic medium
Submitted: 2007-03-13, last modified: 2007-10-22
The mean iron abundance observed in the intergalactic medium (IGM) within
galaxy clusters and without galaxy clusters is consistent with the mean amount
of iron per unit volume in the Universe which has been produced by standard
supernova (SN) explosions with a rate proportional to the cosmic star-formation
rate. If most SNe took place inside galaxies, then the IGM could have been
enriched with their metals by galactic winds and jets that swept most of the
galactic gas with the SNe ejecta into the IGM. A significant fraction of the
early SNe, however, could have taken place outside galaxies or within dwarf
galaxies, which were later disrupted by tidal interactions, and/or mass loss
through fast winds, SN ejecta and jets. Little is known about such
intergalactic SNe at high red-shifts. They could have occurred primarily in
highly obscured environments, avoiding detection. Supporting evidence for
intergalactic SNe is provided by SNe associated with gamma ray bursts (GRBs)
without a host galaxy and from the ratio of well localized GRBs with and
without a host galaxy. A direct test of whether a significant contribution to
the iron abundance in the IGM came from intergalactic SNe would require the
measurement of their rate per comoving unit volume as function of red-shift.
This may be feasible with IR telescopes, such as the Spitzer Space Telescope.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:0707.0283 [pdf] - 2739
What SWIFT has taught us about X-ray flashes and long-duration gamma-ray
bursts
Submitted: 2007-07-02
Recent data gathered and triggered by the SWIFT satellite have greatly
improved our knowledge of long-duration gamma ray bursts (GRBs) and X-ray
flashes (XRFs). This is particularly the case for the X-ray data at all times,
and for UV and optical data at very early times. I show that the optical and
X-ray observations are in excellent agreement with the predictions of the
"cannonball" model of GRBs and XRFs. Elementary physics and just two mechanisms
underlie these predictions: inverse Compton scattering and synchrotron
radiation, generally dominant at early and late times, respectively. I put this
result in its proper context and dedicate the paper to those who planed, built
and operate SWIFT, a true flying jewel.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:0706.0880 [pdf] - 1951
On the X-Ray emission of Gamma Ray Bursts
Submitted: 2007-06-06
Recent data gathered and triggered by the SWIFT satellite have greatly
improved our knowledge of long-duration gamma ray bursts (GRBs) and X-ray
flashes (XRFs). This is particularly the case for the X-ray data at all times.
We show that the entire X-ray observations are in excellent agreement with the
predictions of the `cannonball' model of GRBs and XRFs, which are based on
simple physics and were published long before the launch of SWIFT. Two
mechanisms underlie these predictions: inverse Compton scattering and
synchrotron radiation, generally dominant at early and late times,
respectively. The former mechanism provides a unified description of the
gamma-ray peaks, X-ray flares and even the optical `humps' seen in some
favourable cases; i.e. their very different durations, fluxes and peak-times
are related precisely as predicted. The observed smooth or bumpy fast decay of
the X-ray light curve is correctly described case-by-case, in minute detail.
The `canonical' X-ray plateau, as well as the subsequent gradual steepening of
the afterglow to an asymptotic power-law decay, are as foretold. So are the
chromatic and achromatic properties of the light-curves.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0607479 [pdf] - 83682
On the origin of the diffuse gamma-ray background radiation
Submitted: 2006-07-20, last modified: 2007-04-08
We show that inverse Compton scattering of cosmic-microwave-background and
starlight photons by cosmic-ray electrons in the interstellar and intergalactic
space explains well the spectrum and intensity of the diffuse gamma-ray
background radiation (GBR), which was measured by EGRET aboard the Compton
Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO) in directions away from the Galactic disk and
centre. The Gamma Ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST) will be able to
separate the Galactic foreground from the extragalactic gamma-rays, and to
provide stringent tests of the theory.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0703700 [pdf] - 90509
The time ending the shallow decay of the X-ray light curves of long GRBs
Submitted: 2007-03-27
We show that the mean values and distributions of the time ending the shallow
decay of the light curve of the X-ray afterglow of long gamma ray bursts
(GRBs), the equivalent isotropic energy in the X-ray afterglow up to that time
and the equivalent isotropic GRB energy, as well as the correlations between
them, are precisely those predicted by the cannonball (CB) model of GRBs.
Correlations between prompt and afterglow observables are important in that
they test the overall consistency of a GRB model. In the CB model, the prompt
and afterglow spectra, the endtime, the complex canonical shape of the X-ray
afterglows and the correlations between GRB observables are not surprises, but
predictions.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701031 [pdf] - 254170
On the origin of the correlations between Gamma-Ray Burst observables
Submitted: 2007-01-02, last modified: 2007-03-14
Several pairs of observable properties of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are known
to be correlated. Many such correlations are straightforward predictions of the
'cannonball' model of GRBs. We extend our previous discussions of the subject
to a wealth of new data, and to correlations between 'lag-time', 'variability'
and 'minimum rise-time', with other observables. Schaefer's recent systematic
analysis of the observations of many GRBs of known red-shift gives us a good
and updated data-basis for our study.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0701294 [pdf] - 88423
Implications of the Large Polarization Measured in Gamma Ray Bursts
Submitted: 2007-01-10, last modified: 2007-01-11
The polarization of the prompt $\gamma$-ray emission has been measured in
four bright gamma ray bursts (GRBs). It was nearly maximal in all cases, as
predicted by the Cannonball (CB) model of GRBs long before the observations.
These results are inconsistent with standard models of GRBs wherein the prompt
emission is due to synchrotron radiation. A much smaller linear polarization is
predicted by the CB model for the prompt emission in X-ray flashes (XRFs) and
in extremely luminous GRBs. These measurements would provide yet another
stringent test of the CB model and its unification of GRBs and XRFs.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0611369 [pdf] - 115427
The vicissitudes of "cannonballs": a response to criticisms by A.M.
Hillas and a brief review of our claims
Submitted: 2006-11-29
A.M. Hillas, in a review of the origins of cosmic rays, has recently
criticized the "cannonball" (CB) model of cosmic rays and gamma-ray bursts. We
respond to this critique and take the occasion to discuss the crucial question
of particle acceleration in the CB model and in the generally accepted models.
We also summarize our claims concerning the CB model.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0608092 [pdf] - 115355
A solution of a hoary conundrum: the origin and properties of cosmic
rays
Submitted: 2006-08-08
I discuss a theory of non-solar cosmic rays (CRs) based on a single type of
CR source at all energies. All observed properties of CRs are predicted in
terms of very simple and completely `standard' physics. The source of CRs is
extremely `economical': it has only one parameter to be fitted to the enormous
ensemble of all of the data. All other inputs are `priors', that is theoretical
or observational items of information independent of the properties of the
source of CRs and chosen to lie in their pre-established ranges.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0512196 [pdf] - 260671
On the "canonical behaviour" of the X-ray afterglows of the Gamma Ray
Bursts observed with Swift's XRT
Submitted: 2005-12-07, last modified: 2006-07-20
The "canonical behaviour" of the early X-ray afterglows of long-duration
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) --observed by the X-Ray Telescope of the SWIFT
satellite-- is precisely the one predicted by the Cannonball model of GRBs.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0504480 [pdf] - 72577
The Magnetic Field in Galaxies, Galaxy Clusters, and the InterGalactic
Space
Submitted: 2005-04-21
Magnetic fields of debated origin appear to permeate the Universe on all
large scales. There is mounting evidence that supernovae produce not only
roughly spherical ejecta and winds, but also highly relativistic jets of
ordinary matter. These jets, which travel long distances, slow down by
accelerating the matter encountered on their path to cosmic-ray energies. We
show that, if the turbulent motions induced by the winds and the cosmic rays
generate magnetic fields in rough energy equipartition, the predicted
magnetic-field strengths coincide with the ones observed not only in galaxies
(5 $\mu$G in the Milky Way) but also in galaxy clusters (6 $\mu$G in Coma). The
prediction for the intergalactic (or inter-cluster) field is 50 nG.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0412094 [pdf] - 114909
A Cannonball Model of Cosmic Rays
Submitted: 2004-12-07
I outline a "Cannon-Ball" model of Cosmic Rays in which their distribution in
the Galaxy, their total "luminosity", the broken power-law spectra with their
observed slopes, the position of the knee(s) and ankle(s), and the alleged
variations of composition with energy are all explained in terms of simple and
"standard" physics.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0411763 [pdf] - 880795
A Unified Model of High-Energy Astrophysical phenomena
Submitted: 2004-11-29
I outline a unified model of high-energy astrophysics, in which the gamma
background radiation, cluster "cooling flows", gamma-ray bursts, X-ray flashes
and cosmic-ray electrons and nuclei of all energies -share a common origin. The
mechanism underlying these phenomena is the emission of relativistic
"cannonballs" by ordinary supernovae, analogous to the observed ejection of
plasmoids by quasars and microquasars. I concentrate on Cosmic Rays: the
longest-lasting conundrum in astrophysics. The distribution of Cosmic Rays in
the Galaxy, their total "luminosity", the broken power-law spectra with their
observed slopes, the position of the knee(s) and ankle(s), and the alleged
variations of composition with energy are all explained in terms of simple and
"standard" physics. The model is only lacking a satisfactory theoretical
understanding of the "cannon" that emits the cannonballs in catastrophic
episodes of accretion onto a compact object.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0406325 [pdf] - 65482
The Discovery of a Hyperluminal Source in the Radio Afterglow of GRB
030329
Submitted: 2004-06-14, last modified: 2004-06-24
Taylor, Frail, Berger and Kulkarni have made precise VLBI measurements of the
size and position of the source of the radio afterglow of GRB 030329. They
report a size evolution compatible with standard fireball models, proper motion
limits inconsistent with the cannonball model, and a double source, i.e. "an
additional compact component" on day 51 after the GRB, totally unexpected in
the standard models. We outline a consistent interpretation of the ensemble of
the data in the realm of the cannonball model. The observed double source is a
radio image of the two cannonballs required in this model to explain the
gamma-ray and optical light curves of this GRB; their separation agrees with
the expectation. Thus interpreted, the observation of the two sources
--separated by a "hyperluminal" distance-- is a major discovery in
astrophysics: it pins down the origin of GRBs.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0403015 [pdf] - 63206
On the Polarization of Gamma Ray Bursts and their Optical Afterglows
Submitted: 2004-02-29
The polarization of the optical afterglow (AG) of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) has
only been measured in a few instances at various times after the GRB. In all
cases except the best measured one (GRB 030329) the observed polarization and
its evolution are simple and easy to explain in the most naive version of the
"Cannonball'' model of GRBs: the "intrinsic" AG polarization is small and the
observations reflect the "foreground" effects of the host galaxy and ours. The
polarization observed in GRB 030329 behaves chaotically, its understanding
requires reasonable but ad-hoc ingredients. The polarization of the gamma rays
of a GRB has only been measured in the case of GRB 021206. The result is
debated, but similar measurements would be crucial to the determination of the
GRB-generating mechanism.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0309294 [pdf] - 59121
On the origin of X-ray Flashes
Submitted: 2003-09-10, last modified: 2004-02-24
We use the cannonball (CB) model of gamma ray bursts (GRBs) and their
afterglows (AGs) to analyze the observational data on X-ray flashes (XRFs) and
their AGs. We show that the observations support the CB-model interpretation
that XRFs, like GRBs, are produced by the explosions of core-collapse
supernovae (SNe) akin to SN1998bw, by jets of highly-relativistic CBs. The XRFs
and GRBs are intrinsically identical objects, but the XRFs are viewed from
angles (relative to the jet direction) which are typically a few times larger
than the typical viewing angles of ``classical'', long-duration GRBs. There
should be XRFs, not observed so far, with durations similar to those of short
GRBs.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0402374 [pdf] - 62888
The superluminal motion of Gamma-Ray-Burst sources and the complex
afterglow of GRB 030329
Submitted: 2004-02-16
The source of the very bright Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 030329 is close enough to
us for there to be a hope to measure or significantly constrain its putative
superluminal motion. Such a phenomenon is expected in the ``Cannonball'' (CB)
model of GRBs. Recent precise data on the optical and radio afterglow of this
GRB --which demonstrated its very complex structure-- allow us to pin down the
CB-model's prediction for the afterglow-source position as a function of time.
It has been stated that (the unpublished part of) the new radio data
``unequivocably disprove'' the CB model. We show how greatly exaggerated that
obituary announcement was, and how precise a refined analysis of the data would
have to be, to be still of interest.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:physics/0310134 [pdf] - 119024
The New Paradigm for Gamma Ray Bursts: a Case of Unethical Behaviour?
Submitted: 2003-10-27, last modified: 2003-11-02
One might have hoped that the immediacy and completeness of scientific
information provided through the internet would have made the wrongful
appropriation of someone else's ideas --now so easy to detect and document-- a
sin of the past. Not so. Here I present evidence, which the reader should
judge, of such an apparent misconduct by Sir Martin Rees, the British
Astronomer Royal, and others. Unethical behaviour is not unknown in science. My
sole intention is to call attention to the problem by way of example, in an
attempt to contribute to a more ethical atmosphere, which would in my opinion
be beneficial to the field.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0308248 [pdf] - 58527
Towards a complete theory of Gamma Ray Bursts
Submitted: 2003-08-14, last modified: 2003-09-02
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are notorious for their diversity. Yet, they have a
series of common features. The typical energy of their $\gamma$ rays is a
fraction of an MeV. The energy distributions are well described by a ``Band
spectrum'', with ``peak energies'' spanning a surprisingly narrow range. The
time structure of a GRB consists of pulses, superimposed or not, rising and
decreasing fast. The number of photons in a pulse, the pulses' widths and their
total energy vary within broad but given ranges. Within a pulse, the energy
spectrum softens with increasing time. The duration of a pulse decreases at
higher energies and its peak intensity shifts to earlier time. Many other
correlations between pairs of GRB observables have been identified. Last (and
based on one measured event!) the $\gamma$-ray polarization is very large. A
satisfactory theory of GRBs should naturally and very simply explain, among
others, all these facts. We show that the "cannonball" (CB) model does it. In
the CB model the process leading to the ejection of highly relativistic jetted
CBs in core-collapse supernova (SN) explosions is akin to the one observed in
quasars and microquasars. The prompt $\gamma$-ray emission --the GRB-- is
explained extremely well by inverse Compton scattering of light in the near
environment of the SN by the electrons in the CBs' plasma. We have previously
shown that the CB-model's description of GRB afterglows as synchrotron
radiation from ambient electrons --swept in and accelerated within the CBs-- is
also simple, universal and very successful. The only obstacle still separating
the CB model from a complete theory of GRBs is the theoretical understanding of
the CBs' ejection mechanism in SN explosions.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0306140 [pdf] - 114463
Gamma-ray bursts and the sociology of science
Submitted: 2003-06-16
I discuss what we have learned about Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) by studying
their `afterglows', and how these are interpreted in the generally-accepted
`fireball' model of GRBs, as well as in the generally-unaccepted `cannonball'
model of the same phenomena. The interpretation of GRBs is a good example
around which to frame a discussion of the different approaches to science found
in various fields, such as high-energy physics (HEP), high-energy astrophysics,
or even the deciphering of ancient languages. I use this example to draw
conclusions on `post-academic' science, and on the current status of European
HEP.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0304444 [pdf] - 56352
Cooling flows or warming rays?
Submitted: 2003-04-24
The radiative cooling time of the X-ray-emitting plasma near the center in
many clusters of galaxies is shorter than the age of the cluster, but neither
the expected large drop in central temperature --nor the expected mass flow
towards the pressure-depleted cluster centers-- are observed. We propose a
solution to these ``cooling flow'' problems wherein energy is supplied to the
plasma by hadronic cosmic rays (CRs). The solution requires an energy
deposition more intense and more distributed than in conventional CR models,
but this alternative model is also successful in describing the origin of CRs,
as well as the properties of gamma ray bursts and of the diffuse gamma
background radiation. The X-ray energy emitted by clusters is supplied, in a
quasi-steady state, by the hadronic CRs, which act as ``warming rays''. The
temperature distribution in the intracluster space is successfully predicted
from the measured plasma-density distribution. Four other puzzling features of
clusters can also be explained in simple terms: the discrepancy between their
``virial'' and ``lensing'' masses, their large magnetic fields, the correlation
between their optical and X-ray luminosities, and the non-thermal tail of their
X-ray spectrum.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0304106 [pdf] - 56014
The Supernova associated with GRB 030329
Submitted: 2003-04-06
The relative proximity of the recent gamma ray burst (GRB) 030329 resulted in
a large gamma-ray fluence and in the brightest-ever afterglow (AG), hours after
the burst, in the radio, optical and X-ray bands, permitting precise AG
measurements, sensitive tests of models and an excellent occasion to
investigate the association of GRBs with supernovae (SNe). The Cannonball (CB)
model provides a good, simple and universal description of all AGs of GRBs of
known redshift, so that it is straightforward to use it to predict what the
expected SN signatures are. In the case of GRB 030329, 10 days after burst the
AG should begin to reveal the lightcurve, spectrum and polarization of an
underlying SN --akin to SN1998bw-- which will peak in the NIR/optical band
around day 15. These effects will be easily observable if indeed SN1998bw is a
good ``standard candle'' for GRB-associated SNe and if the so far unknown
extinction in the host galaxy is not too large.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0302429 [pdf] - 55056
What we learn from the afterglow of GRB 021211
Submitted: 2003-02-20, last modified: 2003-02-22
The behaviour of the afterglow (AG) of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) directly
provides, in the cannonball (CB) model, information about the environment of
their progenitor stars. The well observed early temporal decline of the AG of
GRB 021211 is precisely the one predicted in the presence of a progenitor's
``wind'' which resulted in a density profile $\propto 1/r^2$ around the star.
The subsequent fast fading --which makes this GRB ``quasi-dark''-- is the one
anticipated if, further away, the interstellar density is roughly constant and
relatively high. The CB-model fit to the AG clearly shows the presence of an
associated supernova akin to SN1998bw, and allows even for the determination of
the broad-band spectrum of the host galaxy. GRB 990123 and GRB 021004, whose
AGs were also measured very early, are also discussed.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0211596 [pdf] - 53331
Fireballs and cannonballs confront the afterglow of GRB 991208
Submitted: 2002-11-27
Galama et al. have recently reported their follow-up measurements of the
radio afterglow (AG) of the Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) 991208, up to 293 days after
burst, and their reanalysis of the broad-band AG, in the framework of standard
fireball models. They advocate a serious revision of their prior analysis and
conclusions, based on optical data and on their earlier observations during the
first two weeks of the AG. We comment on their work and fill a lacuna: these
authors have overlooked the possibility of comparing their new data to the
available predictions of the cannonball (CB) model, based --like their
incorrect predictions-- on the first round of data. The new data are in good
agreement with these CB-model predictions. This is in spite of the fact that,
in comparison to the fireball models, the CB model is much simpler, much more
predictive, has many fewer parameters, practically no free choices... and it
describes well --on a universal basis-- all the measured AGs of GRBs of known
redshift.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0204474 [pdf] - 49019
On the radio afterglow of gamma ray bursts
Submitted: 2002-04-28, last modified: 2002-11-23
We use the cannonball (CB) model of gamma ray bursts (GRBs) to predict the
spectral and temporal behaviour of their radio afterglows (AGs). A single
simple expression describes the AGs at all times and frequencies; its
high-frequency limit reproduces the successful CB model predictions for optical
and X-ray AGs. We analyze all of the observed radio AGs of GRBs with known
redshifts, including those of the exceptionally close-by GRB 980425. We also
study in detail the time-evolution of the AGs' spectral index. The agreement
between theory and observations is excellent, even though the CB model is
extremely frugal in the number of parameters required to explain the radio
observations. We propose to use the scintillations in the radio AGs of GRBs to
verify and measure the hyperluminal speed of their jetted CBs, whose apparent
angular velocity is of the same order of magnitude as that of galactic pulsars,
consistently measured directly, or via scintillations.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0207015 [pdf] - 50158
On the X-ray lines in the afterglows of GRBs
Submitted: 2002-07-01, last modified: 2002-11-18
The observation of X-ray lines in the afterglow of GRB 011211 has been
reported, and challenged. The lines were interpreted as blue-shifted X-rays
characteristic of a set of photoionized ``metals'', located in a section of a
supernova shell illuminated by a GRB emitted a couple of days after the
supernova explosion. We show that the most prominent reported lines coincide
with the ones predicted in the ``cannonball'' model of GRBs. In this model, the
putative signatures are Hydrogen lines, boosted by the (highly relativistic)
motion of the cannonballs (CBs). The corresponding Doppler boost can be
extracted from the fit to the observed I-, R- and V-band light-curves of the
optical afterglow of GRB 011211, so that, since the redshift is also known, the
line energies are --in the CB model-- predicted. We also discuss other GRBs of
known redshift which show spectral features generally interpreted as Fe lines,
or Fe recombination edges. The ensemble of results is very encouraging from the
CB-model's point of view, but the data on each individual GRB are not good
enough to draw (any) objectively decisive conclusions. We outline a strategy
for X-ray observers to search for lines which, in the CB model, move
predictably from higher to lower energies.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0211224 [pdf] - 52959
Is the afterglow of Gamma Ray Burst 021004 unusual?
Submitted: 2002-11-11, last modified: 2002-11-17
The bumpy light-curve of the bright optical afterglow (AG) of gamma ray burst
(GRB) 021004, its spectral evolution and its radio emission have been claimed
to be unusual. In the Cannonball Model of GRBs that is not the case. The very
early AG's shape is, as for GRB 990123, a direct tracer of the expected
circumburst density profile. The unprecedented precision of the data allows for
the ``resolution'' of two cannonballs (CBs) in the AG. These two CBs correspond
to the two pulses in the GRB and to the two wide humps in the AG light curve.
The smaller wiggles in the AG are, as for GRBs 000301c and 970508, to be
expected: they trace moderate deviations from a constant density interstellar
medium. The observed evolution of the optical spectrum is that predicted in the
CB model. The X-ray and radio emissions of GRB 021004 are also normal.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0207532 [pdf] - 50675
The supernova associated with GRB 020405
Submitted: 2002-07-24, last modified: 2002-08-18
We use the very simple and successful Cannonball (CB) model of gamma ray
bursts (GRBs) and their afterglows (AGs) to analyze the observations of the
mildly extinct optical AG of the relatively nearby GRB 020405. We show that GRB
020405 was associated with a 1998bw-like supernova (SN) at the GRB's redshift
that appeared dimmer and redder than SN1998bw because of extinction in the host
and our Galaxy. The case for the SN/GRB association --advocated in the CB
model-- is becoming indubitable. We discuss the extent to which the GRB/SN
connection is model-dependent.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0207033 [pdf] - 50176
GRBs in the Cannonball model: an overview
Submitted: 2002-07-01, last modified: 2002-07-10
The cannonball model of GRBs is very overt (and, thus, falsifiable) in its
hypothesis and results: all the considerations I review are based on explicit
analytical expressions derived, in fair approximations, from first principles.
The model provides a good description of all the data on all GRBs of known
redshift, has made correct predictions, and is unprecedentedly self-consintent,
simple and successful.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0107367 [pdf] - 43738
On the optical and X-ray afterglows of gamma ray bursts
Submitted: 2001-07-19, last modified: 2002-06-05
We severely criticize the consuetudinary analysis of the afterglows of
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) in the conical-ejection fireball scenarios. We argue
that, instead, recent observations imply that the long-duration GRBs and their
afterglows are produced by highly relativistic jets of cannonballs (CBs)
emitted in supernova explosions. The CBs are heated by their collision with the
supernova shell. The GRB is the boosted surface radiation the CBs emit as they
reach the transparent outskirts of the shell. The exiting CBs further
decelerate by sweeping up interstellar matter (ISM). The early X-ray afterglow
is dominated by thermal bremsstrahlung from the cooling CBs, the optical
afterglow by synchrotron radiation from the ISM electrons swept up by the CBs.
We show that this model fits simply and remarkably well all the measured
optical afterglows of the 15 GRBs with known redshift, including that of GRB
990123, for which unusually prompt data are available. We demonstrate that GRB
980425 was a normal GRB produced by SN1998bw, with standard X-ray and optical
afterglows. We find that the very peculiar afterglow of GRB 970508 can be
explained if its CBs encountered a significant jump in density as they moved
through the ISM. The afterglows of the nearest 8 of the known-redshift GRBs
show various degrees of evidence for an association with a supernova akin to
SN1998bw. In all other cases such an association, even if present, would have
been undetectable with the best current photometric sensitivities. This gives
strong support to the proposition that most, maybe all, of the long-duration
GRBs are associated with supernovae. Though our emphasis is on optical
afterglows, we also provide an excellent description of X-ray afterglows.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0110162 [pdf] - 45220
The threat to life from Eta Carinae and gamma ray bursts
Submitted: 2001-10-08, last modified: 2002-06-03
Eta Carinae, the most massive and luminous star known in our galaxy, is
rapidly boiling matter off its surface. At any time its core could collapse
into a black hole, which may result in a gamma-ray burst (GRB) that can
devastate life on Earth. Auspiciously, recent observations indicate that the
GRBs are narrowly beamed in cones along the rotational axis of the progenitor
star. In the case of Eta Carinae the GRBs will not point to us, but will be
ravaging to life on planets in our galaxy that happen to lie within the two
beaming cones. The mean rate of massive life extinctions by jets from GRBs, per
life-supporting planet in galaxies like ours, is once in 100 million years,
comparable to the rate of major extinctions observed in the geological records
of our planet.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0203440 [pdf] - 48461
Is there a 1998bw-like supernova in the afterglow of gamma ray burst
011121?
Submitted: 2002-03-25
We use the very simple and successful Cannonball Model (CB) of gamma ray
bursts (GRBs) and their afterglows (AGs) to analyze the observations of the
strongly extinct optical AG of the relatively nearby GRB 011121, which were
made with ground-based telescopes at early times, and with the HST at later
time. We show that GRB 011121 was indeed associated with a 1998bw-like
supernova at the GRB's redshift, as we had specifically predicted for this GRB
before the supernova could be observed.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0203315 [pdf] - 48336
Is there a 1998bw-like supernova in the afterglow of gamma ray burst
010921?
Submitted: 2002-03-20, last modified: 2002-03-21
We use the very simple and successful Cannonball Model (CB) of gamma ray
bursts (GRBs) and their afterglows (AGs) to analyze the observations of the
strongly extinct optical AG of GRB 010921 with ground-based telescopes at early
times, and with the HST at later time. We show that GRB 010921 was indeed
associated with a 1998bw-like supernova at the GRB's redshift.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0201210 [pdf] - 47154
Optical and X-ray Afterglows in the Cannonball Model of GRBs
Submitted: 2002-01-14
The Cannonball Model is based on the hypothesis that GRBs and their
afterglows are made in supernova explosions by relativistic ejecta similar to
the ones observed in quasars and microquasars. Its predictions are simple, and
analytical in fair approximations. The model describes well the properties of
the $\gamma$-rays of GRBs. It gives a very simple and extremely successful
description of the optical and X-ray afterglows of {\it all} GRBs of known
redshift. The only problem the model has, so far, is that it is contrary to
staunch orthodox beliefs.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0111468 [pdf] - 46234
Supernova search in the afterglow of gamma ray burst 011121
Submitted: 2001-11-25
In order to assist in planing the search of supernova (SN) in the late time
afterglow (AG) of the gamma ray burst (GRB) 011121 we use the Cannonball Model
of GRBs and the observations of its afterglow in the R band in the first two
days to predict its late time decline and intrinsic spectrum.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0105094 [pdf] - 42323
The Cannonball Model of Gamma Ray Bursts: high-energy neutrinos and
$\gamma$-rays
Submitted: 2001-05-06
Recent observations suggest that $\gamma$-ray bursts (GRBs) and their
afterglows are produced by jets of highly relativistic cannonballs (CBs),
emitted in supernova (SN) explosions. The CBs, reheated by their collision with
the shell, emit radiation that is collimated along their direction of motion
and Doppler-boosted to the typical few-hundred keV energy of the GRB.
Accompanying the GRB, there should be an intense burst of neutrinos of a few
hundreds of GeV energy, made by the decay of charged pions produced in the
collisions of the CBs with the SN shell . The neutrino beam carries almost all
of the emitted energy, but is much narrower than the GRB beam and should only
be detected in coincidence with the small fraction of GRBs whose CBs are moving
very close to the line of sight. The neutral pions made in the transparent
outskirts of the SN shell decay into energetic $\gamma$-rays (EGRs) of energy
of ${\cal{O}}$(100) GeV. The EGR beam, whose energy fluence is comparable to
that of the companion GRB, is as wide as the GRB beam and should be observable,
in coincidence with GRBs, with existing or planned detectors. We derive in
detail these predictions of the CB model.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0102115 [pdf] - 40826
The Cannonball Model of Gamma Ray Bursts: Lines in the X-Ray Afterglow
Submitted: 2001-02-07, last modified: 2001-02-08
Recent observations suggest that gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and their afterglows
are produced by jets of highly relativistic cannonballs (CBs), emitted in
supernova explosions. The fully ionized CBs cool to a temperature below 4500 K
within a day or two, at which point electron-proton recombination produces an
intense Lyman-$\alpha$ emission. The line energy is Doppler-shifted by the CBs'
motion to X-ray energies in the observer's frame. The measured line energies,
corrected for their cosmological redshift, imply Doppler factors in the range
600 to 1000, consistent with those estimated -in the CB model- from the
characteristics of the $\gamma$-ray bursts. All other observed properties of
the lines are also well described by the CB model. Scattering and
self-absorption of the recombination lines within the CB also produce a
wide-band flare-up in the GRB afterglow, as the observations indicate. A very
specific prediction of the CB model is that the X-ray lines ought to be narrow
and move towards lower line energies as they are observed: their current
apparently large widths would be the effect of time integration, and/or of the
blending of lines from CBs with different Doppler factors.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0008474 [pdf] - 37790
A cannonball model of gamma-ray bursts: superluminal signatures
Submitted: 2000-08-30, last modified: 2000-09-12
Recent observations suggest that the long-duration gamma ray bursts (GRBs)
and their afterglows are produced by highly relativistic jets emitted in
supernova explosions. We propose that the result of the event is not just a
compact object plus the ejecta: within a day, a fraction of the parent star
falls back to produce a thick accretion disk. The subsequent accretion
generates jets and constitutes the GRB ``engine'', as in the observed ejection
of relativistic ``cannonballs'' of plasma by microquasars and active galactic
nuclei. The GRB is produced as the jetted cannonballs exit the supernova shell
reheated by the collision, re-emitting their own radiation and boosting the
light of the shell. They decelerate by sweeping up interstellar matter, which
is accelerated to cosmic-ray energies and emits synchrotron radiation: the
afterglow. We emphasize here a smoking-gun signature of this model of GRBs: the
superluminal motion of the afterglow, that can be searched for ---the sooner
the better--- in the particular case of GRB 980425.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9707087 [pdf] - 419236
A Matter-Antimatter Universe?
Submitted: 1997-07-07, last modified: 1997-11-15
We ask whether the universe can be a patchwork consisting of distinct regions
of matter and antimatter. We demonstrate that, after recombination, it is
impossible to avoid annihilation near regional boundaries. We study the
dynamics of this process to estimate two of its signatures: a contribution to
the cosmic diffuse gamma-ray background and a distortion of the cosmic
microwave background. The former signal exceeds observational limits unless the
matter domain we inhabit is virtually the entire visible universe. On general
grounds, we conclude that a matter-antimatter symmetric universe is empirically
excluded.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9709132 [pdf] - 98585
Scars on the CBR?
Submitted: 1997-09-14
We ask whether the universe can be a patchwork consisting of distinct regions
of matter and antimatter. In previous work we demonstrated that
post-recombination matter-antimatter contact near regional boundaries leads to
an observable (but unobserved) gamma-ray flux for domain sizes of less than a
few thousand Mpc, thereby excluding such domains. In this paper we consider the
pre-recombination signal from domains of larger size.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9705045 [pdf] - 97307
Avatars of a Matter-Antimatter Universe
Submitted: 1997-05-07
An elegantly symmetric Universe, consisting of large islands of matter and
antimatter, is by no means obviously out of the question. I review the
observations that lead to the usual prejudice that the Universe contains only
matter. I discuss recent work inferring that this prejudice can be converted
into an inescapable conclusion. I argue that our theoretical conviction should
not discourage direct searches for antimatter in cosmic rays.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9408099 [pdf] - 1234251
Whither do the microlensing Brown Dwarfs rove?
Submitted: 1994-08-31
The EROS and MACHO collaborations have reported observations of light curves
of stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud that are compatible with gravitational
microlensing by intervening massive objects, presumably Brown-Dwarf stars. The
OGLE and MACHO teams have also seen similar events in the direction of the
galactic Bulge. Current data are insufficient to decide whether the
Brown-Dwarfs are dark-matter constituents of the non-luminous galactic Halo, or
belong to a more conventional population, such as that of faint stars in the
galactic Spheroid, in its Thin or Thick Disks, or in their possible LMC
counterparts. We discuss in detail how further observations of microlensing
rates, and of the moments of the distribution of event durations, can help
resolve the issue of the Brown-Dwarf location, and eventually provide
information on the mass function of the dark objects.