sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Davison, T. M.

Normalized to: Davison, T.

17 article(s) in total. 419 co-authors, from 1 to 12 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 22,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.08590  [pdf] - 2124921
An EAGLE's View of Ex-situ Galaxy Growth
Comments: 16 pages, 11 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2020-06-15
Modern observational and analytic techniques now enable the direct measurement of star formation histories and the inference of galaxy assembly histories. However, current theoretical predictions of assembly are not ideally suited for direct comparison with such observational data. We therefore extend the work of prior examinations of the contribution of ex-situ stars to the stellar mass budget of simulated galaxies. Our predictions are specifically tailored for direct testing with a new generation of observational techniques by calculating ex-situ fractions as functions of galaxy mass and morphological type, for a range of surface brightnesses. These enable comparison with results from large FoV IFU spectrographs, and increasingly accurate spectral fitting, providing a look-up method for the estimated accreted fraction. We furthermore provide predictions of ex-situ mass fractions as functions of galaxy mass, galactocentric radius and environment. Using $z=0$ snapshots from the 100cMpc$^3$ and 25cMpc$^3$ EAGLE simulations we corroborate the findings of prior studies, finding that ex-situ fraction increases with stellar mass for central and satellite galaxies in a stellar mass range of 2$\times$10$^{7}$ - 1.9$\times$10$^{12}$ M$_{\odot}$. For those galaxies of mass M$_*$>5$\times$10$^{8}$M$_{\odot}$, we find that the total ex-situ mass fraction is greater for more extended galaxies at fixed mass. When categorising satellite galaxies by their parent group/cluster halo mass we find that the ex-situ fraction decreases with increasing parent halo mass at fixed galaxy mass. This apparently counter-intuitive result may be the result of high passing velocities within large cluster halos inhibiting efficient accretion onto individual galaxies.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1912.00371  [pdf] - 2042287
Enhancement of impact heating in pressure-strengthened rocks in oblique impacts
Comments: 14 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters
Submitted: 2019-12-01
Shock-induced metamorphism in meteorites informs us about the collisional environment and history of our solar system. Recently the importance of material strength in impact heating was reported from head-on impact simulations. Here, we perform three-dimensional oblique impact simulations, and confirm the additional heating due to material strength for oblique impacts. Despite a large difference in the peak pressure at the impact point at a given impact velocity, we find that the heated mass for an oblique impact is nearly the same as that for a head-on impact. Thus, our results differ from the previous finding that the heated mass decreases as the impact becomes more oblique, and show that the additional shear heating is more effective for oblique impacts than for head-on impacts. This also indicates that material ejected during oblique impact tends to experience lower shock pressures but higher temperatures.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.09124  [pdf] - 1990394
The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment
The LZ Collaboration; Akerib, D. S.; Akerlof, C. W.; Akimov, D. Yu.; Alquahtani, A.; Alsum, S. K.; Anderson, T. J.; Angelides, N.; Araújo, H. M.; Arbuckle, A.; Armstrong, J. E.; Arthurs, M.; Auyeung, H.; Bai, X.; Bailey, A. J.; Balajthy, J.; Balashov, S.; Bang, J.; Barry, M. J.; Barthel, J.; Bauer, D.; Bauer, P.; Baxter, A.; Belle, J.; Beltrame, P.; Bensinger, J.; Benson, T.; Bernard, E. P.; Bernstein, A.; Bhatti, A.; Biekert, A.; Biesiadzinski, T. P.; Birrittella, B.; Boast, K. E.; Bolozdynya, A. I.; Boulton, E. M.; Boxer, B.; Bramante, R.; Branson, S.; Brás, P.; Breidenbach, M.; Buckley, J. H.; Bugaev, V. V.; Bunker, R.; Burdin, S.; Busenitz, J. K.; Campbell, J. S.; Carels, C.; Carlsmith, D. L.; Carlson, B.; Carmona-Benitez, M. C.; Cascella, M.; Chan, C.; Cherwinka, J. J.; Chiller, A. A.; Chiller, C.; Chott, N. I.; Cole, A.; Coleman, J.; Colling, D.; Conley, R. A.; Cottle, A.; Coughlen, R.; Craddock, W. W.; Curran, D.; Currie, A.; Cutter, J. E.; da Cunha, J. P.; Dahl, C. E.; Dardin, S.; Dasu, S.; Davis, J.; Davison, T. J. R.; de Viveiros, L.; Decheine, N.; Dobi, A.; Dobson, J. E. Y.; Druszkiewicz, E.; Dushkin, A.; Edberg, T. K.; Edwards, W. R.; Edwards, B. N.; Edwards, J.; Elnimr, M. M.; Emmet, W. T.; Eriksen, S. R.; Faham, C. H.; Fan, A.; Fayer, S.; Fiorucci, S.; Flaecher, H.; Florang, I. M. Fogarty; Ford, P.; Francis, V. B.; Froborg, F.; Fruth, T.; Gaitskell, R. J.; Gantos, N. J.; Garcia, D.; Geffre, A.; Gehman, V. M.; Gelfand, R.; Genovesi, J.; Gerhard, R. M.; Ghag, C.; Gibson, E.; Gilchriese, M. G. D.; Gokhale, S.; Gomber, B.; Gonda, T. G.; Greenall, A.; Greenwood, S.; Gregerson, G.; van der Grinten, M. G. D.; Gwilliam, C. B.; Hall, C. R.; Hamilton, D.; Hans, S.; Hanzel, K.; Harrington, T.; Harrison, A.; Hasselkus, C.; Haselschwardt, S. J.; Hemer, D.; Hertel, S. A.; Heise, J.; Hillbrand, S.; Hitchcock, O.; Hjemfelt, C.; Hoff, M. D.; Holbrook, B.; Holtom, E.; Hor, J. Y-K.; Horn, M.; Huang, D. Q.; Hurteau, T. W.; Ignarra, C. M.; Irving, M. N.; Jacobsen, R. G.; Jahangir, O.; Jeffery, S. N.; Ji, W.; Johnson, M.; Johnson, J.; Johnson, P.; Jones, W. G.; Kaboth, A. C.; Kamaha, A.; Kamdin, K.; Kasey, V.; Kazkaz, K.; Keefner, J.; Khaitan, D.; Khaleeq, M.; Khazov, A.; Khromov, A. V.; Khurana, I.; Kim, Y. D.; Kim, W. T.; Kocher, C. D.; Konovalov, A. M.; Korley, L.; Korolkova, E. V.; Koyuncu, M.; Kras, J.; Kraus, H.; Kravitz, S. W.; Krebs, H. J.; Kreczko, L.; Krikler, B.; Kudryavtsev, V. A.; Kumpan, A. V.; Kyre, S.; Lambert, A. R.; Landerud, B.; Larsen, N. A.; Laundrie, A.; Leason, E. A.; Lee, H. S.; Lee, J.; Lee, C.; Lenardo, B. G.; Leonard, D. S.; Leonard, R.; Lesko, K. T.; Levy, C.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Liao, J.; Liao, F. -T.; Lin, J.; Lindote, A.; Linehan, R.; Lippincott, W. H.; Liu, R.; Liu, X.; Loniewski, C.; Lopes, M. I.; Paredes, B. López; Lorenzon, W.; Lucero, D.; Luitz, S.; Lyle, J. M.; Lynch, C.; Majewski, P. A.; Makkinje, J.; Malling, D. C.; Manalaysay, A.; Manenti, L.; Mannino, R. L.; Marangou, N.; Markley, D. J.; MarrLaundrie, P.; Martin, T. J.; Marzioni, M. F.; Maupin, C.; McConnell, C. T.; McKinsey, D. N.; McLaughlin, J.; Mei, D. -M.; Meng, Y.; Miller, E. H.; Minaker, Z. J.; Mizrachi, E.; Mock, J.; Molash, D.; Monte, A.; Monzani, M. E.; Morad, J. A.; Morrison, E.; Mount, B. J.; Murphy, A. St. J.; Naim, D.; Naylor, A.; Nedlik, C.; Nehrkorn, C.; Nelson, H. N.; Nesbit, J.; Neves, F.; Nikkel, J. A.; Nikoleyczik, J. A.; Nilima, A.; O'Dell, J.; Oh, H.; O'Neill, F. G.; O'Sullivan, K.; Olcina, I.; Olevitch, M. A.; Oliver-Mallory, K. C.; Oxborough, L.; Pagac, A.; Pagenkopf, D.; Pal, S.; Palladino, K. J.; Palmaccio, V. M.; Palmer, J.; Pangilinan, M.; Patton, S. J.; Pease, E. K.; Penning, B. P.; Pereira, G.; Pereira, C.; Peterson, I. B.; Piepke, A.; Pierson, S.; Powell, S.; Preece, R. M.; Pushkin, K.; Qie, Y.; Racine, M.; Ratcliff, B. N.; Reichenbacher, J.; Reichhart, L.; Rhyne, C. A.; Richards, A.; Riffard, Q.; Rischbieter, G. R. C.; Rodrigues, J. P.; Rose, H. J.; Rosero, R.; Rossiter, P.; Rucinski, R.; Rutherford, G.; Rynders, D.; Saba, J. S.; Sabarots, L.; Santone, D.; Sarychev, M.; Sazzad, A. B. M. R.; Schnee, R. W.; Schubnell, M.; Scovell, P. R.; Severson, M.; Seymour, D.; Shaw, S.; Shutt, G. W.; Shutt, T. A.; Silk, J. J.; Silva, C.; Skarpaas, K.; Skulski, W.; Smith, A. R.; Smith, R. J.; Smith, R. E.; So, J.; Solmaz, M.; Solovov, V. N.; Sorensen, P.; Sosnovtsev, V. V.; Stancu, I.; Stark, M. R.; Stephenson, S.; Stern, N.; Stevens, A.; Stiegler, T. M.; Stifter, K.; Studley, R.; Sumner, T. J.; Sundarnath, K.; Sutcliffe, P.; Swanson, N.; Szydagis, M.; Tan, M.; Taylor, W. C.; Taylor, R.; Taylor, D. J.; Temples, D.; Tennyson, B. P.; Terman, P. A.; Thomas, K. J.; Thomson, J. A.; Tiedt, D. R.; Timalsina, M.; To, W. H.; Tomás, A.; Tope, T. E.; Tripathi, M.; Tronstad, D. R.; Tull, C. E.; Turner, W.; Tvrznikova, L.; Utes, M.; Utku, U.; Uvarov, S.; Va'vra, J.; Vacheret, A.; Vaitkus, A.; Verbus, J. R.; Vietanen, T.; Voirin, E.; Vuosalo, C. O.; Walcott, S.; Waldron, W. L.; Walker, K.; Wang, J. J.; Wang, R.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Watson, J. R.; Migneault, J.; Weatherly, S.; Webb, R. C.; Wei, W. -Z.; While, M.; White, R. G.; White, J. T.; White, D. T.; Whitis, T. J.; Wisniewski, W. J.; Wilson, K.; Witherell, M. S.; Wolfs, F. L. H.; Wolfs, J. D.; Woodward, D.; Worm, S. D.; Xiang, X.; Xiao, Q.; Xu, J.; Yeh, M.; Yin, J.; Young, I.; Zhang, C.
Comments:
Submitted: 2019-10-20, last modified: 2019-11-03
We describe the design and assembly of the LUX-ZEPLIN experiment, a direct detection search for cosmic WIMP dark matter particles. The centerpiece of the experiment is a large liquid xenon time projection chamber sensitive to low energy nuclear recoils. Rejection of backgrounds is enhanced by a Xe skin veto detector and by a liquid scintillator Outer Detector loaded with gadolinium for efficient neutron capture and tagging. LZ is located in the Davis Cavern at the 4850' level of the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota, USA. We describe the major subsystems of the experiment and its key design features and requirements.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.11241  [pdf] - 1981692
Results of a Search for Sub-GeV Dark Matter Using 2013 LUX Data
Comments:
Submitted: 2018-11-27, last modified: 2019-10-16
The scattering of dark matter (DM) particles with sub-GeV masses off nuclei is difficult to detect using liquid xenon-based DM search instruments because the energy transfer during nuclear recoils is smaller than the typical detector threshold. However, the tree-level DM-nucleus scattering diagram can be accompanied by simultaneous emission of a Bremsstrahlung photon or a so-called "Migdal" electron. These provide an electron recoil component to the experimental signature at higher energies than the corresponding nuclear recoil. The presence of this signature allows liquid xenon detectors to use both the scintillation and the ionization signals in the analysis where the nuclear recoil signal would not be otherwise visible. We report constraints on spin-independent DM-nucleon scattering for DM particles with masses of 0.4-5 GeV/c$^2$ using 1.4$\times10^4$ kg$\cdot$day of search exposure from the 2013 data from the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment for four different classes of mediators. This analysis extends the reach of liquid xenon-based DM search instruments to lower DM masses than has been achieved previously.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1807.07113  [pdf] - 1758152
Search for annual and diurnal rate modulations in the LUX experiment
Comments: 12 pages, 9 figures
Submitted: 2018-07-18, last modified: 2018-09-27
Various dark matter models predict annual and diurnal modulations of dark matter interaction rates in Earth-based experiments as a result of the Earth's motion in the halo. Observation of such features can provide generic evidence for detection of dark matter interactions. This paper reports a search for both annual and diurnal rate modulations in the LUX dark matter experiment using over 20 calendar months of data acquired between 2013 and 2016. This search focuses on electron recoil events at low energies, where leptophilic dark matter interactions are expected to occur and where the DAMA experiment has observed a strong rate modulation for over two decades. By using the innermost volume of the LUX detector and developing robust cuts and corrections, we obtained a stable event rate of 2.3$\pm$0.2~cpd/keV$_{\text{ee}}$/tonne, which is among the lowest in all dark matter experiments. No statistically significant annual modulation was observed in energy windows up to 26~keV$_{\text{ee}}$. Between 2 and 6~keV$_{\text{ee}}$, this analysis demonstrates the most sensitive annual modulation search up to date, with 9.2$\sigma$ tension with the DAMA/LIBRA result. We also report no observation of diurnal modulations above 0.2~cpd/keV$_{\text{ee}}$/tonne amplitude between 2 and 6~keV$_{\text{ee}}$.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1709.00800  [pdf] - 1611913
Ultra-Low Energy Calibration of LUX Detector using $^{127}$Xe Electron Capture
Comments: 10 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables
Submitted: 2017-09-03
We report an absolute calibration of the ionization yields($\textit{Q$_y$})$ and fluctuations for electronic recoil events in liquid xenon at discrete energies between 186 eV and 33.2 keV. The average electric field applied across the liquid xenon target is 180 V/cm. The data are obtained using low energy $^{127}$Xe electron capture decay events from the 95.0-day first run from LUX (WS2013) in search of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). The sequence of gamma-ray and X-ray cascades associated with $^{127}$I de-excitations produces clearly identified 2-vertex events in the LUX detector. We observe the K- (binding energy, 33.2 keV), L- (5.2 keV), M- (1.1 keV), and N- (186 eV) shell cascade events and verify that the relative ratio of observed events for each shell agrees with calculations. The N-shell cascade analysis includes single extracted electron (SE) events and represents the lowest-energy electronic recoil $\textit{in situ}$ measurements that have been explored in liquid xenon.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1704.02297  [pdf] - 1582421
First Searches for Axions and Axion-Like Particles with the LUX Experiment
Comments:
Submitted: 2017-04-07, last modified: 2017-06-30
The first searches for axions and axion-like particles with the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment are presented. Under the assumption of an axio-electric interaction in xenon, the coupling constant between axions and electrons, gAe is tested, using data collected in 2013 with an exposure totalling 95 live-days $\times$ 118 kg. A double-sided, profile likelihood ratio statistic test excludes gAe larger than 3.5 $\times$ 10$^{-12}$ (90% C.L.) for solar axions. Assuming the DFSZ theoretical description, the upper limit in coupling corresponds to an upper limit on axion mass of 0.12 eV/c$^{2}$, while for the KSVZ description masses above 36.6 eV/c$^{2}$ are excluded. For galactic axion-like particles, values of gAe larger than 4.2 $\times$ 10$^{-13}$ are excluded for particle masses in the range 1-16 keV/c$^{2}$. These are the most stringent constraints to date for these interactions.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:1705.03380  [pdf] - 1583256
Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the complete LUX exposure
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures, version accepted by PRL
Submitted: 2017-05-09, last modified: 2017-06-23
We present experimental constraints on the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon elastic cross sections from the total 129.5 kg-year exposure acquired by the Large Underground Xenon experiment (LUX), operating at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota (USA). A profile likelihood ratio analysis allows 90% CL upper limits to be set on the WIMP-neutron (WIMP-proton) cross section of $\sigma_n$ = 1.6$\times 10^{-41}$ cm$^{2}$ ($\sigma_p$ = 5$\times 10^{-40}$ cm$^{2}$) at 35 GeV$c^{-2}$, almost a sixfold improvement over the previous LUX spin-dependent results. The spin-dependent WIMP-neutron limit is the most sensitive constraint to date.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:1703.09144  [pdf] - 1554108
LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Technical Design Report
Mount, B. J.; Hans, S.; Rosero, R.; Yeh, M.; Chan, C.; Gaitskell, R. J.; Huang, D. Q.; Makkinje, J.; Malling, D. C.; Pangilinan, M.; Rhyne, C. A.; Taylor, W. C.; Verbus, J. R.; Kim, Y. D.; Lee, H. S.; Lee, J.; Leonard, D. S.; Li, J.; Belle, J.; Cottle, A.; Lippincott, W. H.; Markley, D. J.; Martin, T. J.; Sarychev, M.; Tope, T. E.; Utes, M.; Wang, R.; Young, I.; Araújo, H. M.; Bailey, A. J.; Bauer, D.; Colling, D.; Currie, A.; Fayer, S.; Froborg, F.; Greenwood, S.; Jones, W. G.; Kasey, V.; Khaleeq, M.; Olcina, I.; Paredes, B. López; Richards, A.; Sumner, T. J.; Tomás, A.; Vacheret, A.; Brás, P.; Lindote, A.; Lopes, M. I.; Neves, F.; Rodrigues, J. P.; Silva, C.; Solovov, V. N.; Barry, M. J.; Cole, A.; Dobi, A.; Edwards, W. R.; Faham, C. H.; Fiorucci, S.; Gantos, N. J.; Gehman, V. M.; Gilchriese, M. G. D.; Hanzel, K.; Hoff, M. D.; Kamdin, K.; Lesko, K. T.; McConnell, C. T.; O'Sullivan, K.; Oliver-Mallory, K. C.; Patton, S. J.; Saba, J. S.; Sorensen, P.; Thomas, K. J.; Tull, C. E.; Waldron, W. L.; Witherell, M. S.; Bernstein, A.; Kazkaz, K.; Xu, J.; Akimov, D. Yu.; Bolozdynya, A. I.; Khromov, A. V.; Konovalov, A. M.; Kumpan, A. V.; Sosnovtsev, V. V.; Dahl, C. E.; Temples, D.; Carmona-Benitez, M. C.; de Viveiros, L.; Akerib, D. S.; Auyeung, H.; Biesiadzinski, T. P.; Breidenbach, M.; Bramante, R.; Conley, R.; Craddock, W. W.; Fan, A.; Hau, A.; Ignarra, C. M.; Ji, W.; Krebs, H. J.; Linehan, R.; Lee, C.; Luitz, S.; Mizrachi, E.; Monzani, M. E.; O'Neill, F. G.; Pierson, S.; Racine, M.; Ratcliff, B. N.; Shutt, G. W.; Shutt, T. A.; Skarpaas, K.; Stifter, K.; To, W. H.; Va'vra, J.; Whitis, T. J.; Wisniewski, W. J.; Bai, X.; Bunker, R.; Coughlen, R.; Hjemfelt, C.; Leonard, R.; Miller, E. H.; Morrison, E.; Reichenbacher, J.; Schnee, R. W.; Stark, M. R.; Sundarnath, K.; Tiedt, D. R.; Timalsina, M.; Bauer, P.; Carlson, B.; Horn, M.; Johnson, M.; Keefner, J.; Maupin, C.; Taylor, D. J.; Balashov, S.; Ford, P.; Francis, V.; Holtom, E.; Khazov, A.; Kaboth, A.; Majewski, P.; Nikkel, J. A.; O'Dell, J.; Preece, R. M.; van der Grinten, M. G. D.; Worm, S. D.; Mannino, R. L.; Stiegler, T. M.; Terman, P. A.; Webb, R. C.; Levy, C.; Mock, J.; Szydagis, M.; Busenitz, J. K.; Elnimr, M.; Hor, J. Y-K.; Meng, Y.; Piepke, A.; Stancu, I.; Kreczko, L.; Krikler, B.; Penning, B.; Bernard, E. P.; Jacobsen, R. G.; McKinsey, D. N.; Watson, R.; Cutter, J. E.; El-Jurf, S.; Gerhard, R. M.; Hemer, D.; Hillbrand, S.; Holbrook, B.; Lenardo, B. G.; Manalaysay, A. G.; Morad, J. A.; Stephenson, S.; Thomson, J. A.; Tripathi, M.; Uvarov, S.; Haselschwardt, S. J.; Kyre, S.; Nehrkorn, C.; Nelson, H. N.; Solmaz, M.; White, D. T.; Cascella, M.; Dobson, J. E. Y.; Ghag, C.; Liu, X.; Manenti, L.; Reichhart, L.; Shaw, S.; Utku, U.; Beltrame, P.; Davison, T. J. R.; Marzioni, M. F.; Murphy, A. St. J.; Nilima, A.; Boxer, B.; Burdin, S.; Greenall, A.; Powell, S.; Rose, H. J.; Sutcliffe, P.; Balajthy, J.; Edberg, T. K.; Hall, C. R.; Silk, J. S.; Hertel, S.; Akerlof, C. W.; Arthurs, M.; Lorenzon, W.; Pushkin, K.; Schubnell, M.; Boast, K. E.; Carels, C.; Fruth, T.; Kraus, H.; Liao, F. -T.; Lin, J.; Scovell, P. R.; Druszkiewicz, E.; Khaitan, D.; Koyuncu, M.; Skulski, W.; Wolfs, F. L. H.; Yin, J.; Korolkova, E. V.; Kudryavtsev, V. A.; Rossiter, P.; Woodward, D.; Chiller, A. A.; Chiller, C.; Mei, D. -M.; Wang, L.; Wei, W. -Z.; While, M.; Zhang, C.; Alsum, S. K.; Benson, T.; Carlsmith, D. L.; Cherwinka, J. J.; Dasu, S.; Gregerson, G.; Gomber, B.; Pagac, A.; Palladino, K. J.; Vuosalo, C. O.; Xiao, Q.; Buckley, J. H.; Bugaev, V. V.; Olevitch, M. A.; Boulton, E. M.; Emmet, W. T.; Hurteau, T. W.; Larsen, N. A.; Pease, E. K.; Tennyson, B. P.; Tvrznikova, L.
Comments: 392 pages. Submitted to the Department of Energy as part of the documentation for the Critical Decision Numbers Two and Three (CD-2 and CD-3) management processes. Report also available by chapter at <a href="http://hep.ucsb.edu/LZ/TDR/">this URL</a>
Submitted: 2017-03-27
In this Technical Design Report (TDR) we describe the LZ detector to be built at the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF). The LZ dark matter experiment is designed to achieve sensitivity to a WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross section of three times ten to the negative forty-eighth square centimeters.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:1608.07648  [pdf] - 1531370
Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure
Comments: This version includes a combined analysis with previously published LUX results, and matches the version published in PRL
Submitted: 2016-08-26, last modified: 2017-01-13
We report constraints on spin-independent weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP)-nucleon scattering using a 3.35e4 kg-day exposure of the Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment. A dual-phase xenon time projection chamber with 250 kg of active mass is operated at the Sanford Underground Research Facility under Lead, South Dakota (USA). With roughly fourfold improvement in sensitivity for high WIMP masses relative to our previous results, this search yields no evidence of WIMP nuclear recoils. At a WIMP mass of 50 GeV/c^2, WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross sections above 2.2e-46 cm^2 are excluded at the 90% confidence level. When combined with the previously reported LUX exposure, this exclusion strengthens to 1.1e-46 cm^2 at 50 GeV/c^2.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:1608.05381  [pdf] - 1503451
Low-energy (0.7-74 keV) nuclear recoil calibration of the LUX dark matter experiment using D-D neutron scattering kinematics
LUX Collaboration; Akerib, D. S.; Alsum, S.; Araújo, H. M.; Bai, X.; Bailey, A. J.; Balajthy, J.; Beltrame, P.; Bernard, E. P.; Bernstein, A.; Biesiadzinski, T. P.; Boulton, E. M.; Bradley, A.; Bramante, R.; Brás, P.; Byram, D.; Cahn, S. B.; Carmona-Benitez, M. C.; Chan, C.; Chapman, J. J.; Chiller, A. A.; Chiller, C.; Currie, A.; Cutter, J. E.; Davison, T. J. R.; de Viveiros, L.; Dobi, A.; Dobson, J. E. Y.; Druszkiewicz, E.; Edwards, B. N.; Faham, C. H.; Fiorucci, S.; Gaitskell, R. J.; Gehman, V. M.; Ghag, C.; Gibson, K. R.; Gilchriese, M. G. D.; Hall, C. R.; Hanhardt, M.; Haselschwardt, S. J.; Hertel, S. A.; Hogan, D. P.; Horn, M.; Huang, D. Q.; Ignarra, C. M.; Ihm, M.; Jacobsen, R. G.; Ji, W.; Kamdin, K.; Kazkaz, K.; Khaitan, D.; Knoche, R.; Larsen, N. A.; Lee, C.; Lenardo, B. G.; Lesko, K. T.; Lindote, A.; Lopes, M. I.; Malling, D. C.; Manalaysay, A.; Mannino, R. L.; Marzioni, M. F.; McKinsey, D. N.; Mei, D. M.; Mock, J.; Moongweluwan, M.; Morad, J. A.; Murphy, A. St. J.; Nehrkorn, C.; Nelson, H. N.; Neves, F.; O'Sullivan, K.; Oliver-Mallory, K. C.; Palladino, K. J.; Pangilinan, M.; Pease, E. K.; Phelps, P.; Reichhart, L.; Rhyne, C. A.; Shaw, S.; Shutt, T. A.; Silva, C.; Solmaz, M.; Solovov, V. N.; Sorensen, P.; Stephenson, S.; Sumner, T. J.; Szydagis, M.; Taylor, D. J.; Taylor, W. C.; Tennyson, B. P.; Terman, P. A.; Tiedt, D. R.; To, W. H.; Tripathi, M.; Tvrznikova, L.; Uvarov, S.; Verbus, J. R.; Webb, R. C.; White, J. T.; Whitis, T. J.; Witherell, M. S.; Wolfs, F. L. H.; Xu, J.; Yazdani, K.; Young, S. K.; Zhang, C.
Comments: 24 pages, 15 figures, 6 tables
Submitted: 2016-08-18, last modified: 2016-10-26
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment is a dual-phase liquid xenon time projection chamber (TPC) operating at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota. A calibration of nuclear recoils in liquid xenon was performed $\textit{in situ}$ in the LUX detector using a collimated beam of mono-energetic 2.45 MeV neutrons produced by a deuterium-deuterium (D-D) fusion source. The nuclear recoil energy from the first neutron scatter in the TPC was reconstructed using the measured scattering angle defined by double-scatter neutron events within the active xenon volume. We measured the absolute charge ($Q_{y}$) and light ($L_{y}$) yields at an average electric field of 180 V/cm for nuclear recoil energies spanning 0.7 to 74 keV and 1.1 to 74 keV, respectively. This calibration of the nuclear recoil signal yields will permit the further refinement of liquid xenon nuclear recoil signal models and, importantly for dark matter searches, clearly demonstrates measured ionization and scintillation signals in this medium at recoil energies down to $\mathcal{O}$(1 keV).
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:1512.03506  [pdf] - 1406496
Improved Limits on Scattering of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles from Reanalysis of 2013 LUX data
Comments: Accepted by Phys. Rev. Lett
Submitted: 2015-12-10, last modified: 2016-05-16
We present constraints on weakly interacting massive particles (WIMP)-nucleus scattering from the 2013 data of the Large Underground Xenon dark matter experiment, including $1.4\times10^{4}\;\mathrm{kg\; day}$ of search exposure. This new analysis incorporates several advances: single-photon calibration at the scintillation wavelength, improved event-reconstruction algorithms, a revised background model including events originating on the detector walls in an enlarged fiducial volume, and new calibrations from decays of an injected tritium $\beta$ source and from kinematically constrained nuclear recoils down to 1.1 keV. Sensitivity, especially to low-mass WIMPs, is enhanced compared to our previous results which modeled the signal only above a 3 keV minimum energy. Under standard dark matter halo assumptions and in the mass range above 4 $\mathrm{GeV}\,c^{-2}$, these new results give the most stringent direct limits on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross section. The 90% C.L. upper limit has a minimum of 0.6 zb at 33 $\mathrm{GeV}\,c^{-2}$ WIMP mass.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:1512.03133  [pdf] - 1402511
Tritium calibration of the LUX dark matter experiment
Comments:
Submitted: 2015-12-09, last modified: 2016-05-05
We present measurements of the electron-recoil (ER) response of the LUX dark matter detector based upon 170,000 highly pure and spatially-uniform tritium decays. We reconstruct the tritium energy spectrum using the combined energy model and find good agreement with expectations. We report the average charge and light yields of ER events in liquid xenon at 180 V/cm and 105 V/cm and compare the results to the NEST model. We also measure the mean charge recombination fraction and its fluctuations, and we investigate the location and width of the LUX ER band. These results provide input to a re-analysis of the LUX Run3 WIMP search.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:1603.00376  [pdf] - 1388968
Mesoscale Modeling of Impact Compaction of Primitive Solar System Solids
Comments: 18 pages, 16 figures, 4 tables. Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2016-03-01, last modified: 2016-03-03
We have developed a method for simulating the mesoscale compaction of early solar system solids in low velocity impact events, using the iSALE shock physics code. Chondrules are represented by nonporous disks, placed within a porous matrix. By simulating impacts into bimodal mixtures over a wide range of parameter space (including the chondrule-to-matrix ratio, the matrix porosity and composition and the impact velocity), we have shown how each of these parameters influences the shock processing of heterogeneous materials. The temperature after shock processing shows a strong dichotomy: matrix temperatures are elevated much higher than the chondrules, which remain largely cold. Chondrules can protect some matrix from shock compaction, with shadow regions in the lee side of chondrules exhibiting higher porosity that elsewhere in the matrix. Using the results from this mesoscale modelling, we show how the $\varepsilon-\alpha$ porous compaction model parameters depend on initial bulk porosity. We also show that the timescale for the temperature dichotomy to equilibrate is highly dependent on the porosity of the matrix after the shock, and will be on the order of seconds for matrix porosities of less than 0.1, and on the order of 10's to 100's seconds for matrix porosities of $\sim$ 0.3--0.5. Finally, we have shown that the composition of the post-shock material is able to match the bulk porosity and chondrule-to-matrix ratios of meteorite groups such as carbonaceous chondrites and unequilibrated ordinary chondrites.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:1509.02910  [pdf] - 1286987
LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Conceptual Design Report
The LZ Collaboration; Akerib, D. S.; Akerlof, C. W.; Akimov, D. Yu.; Alsum, S. K.; Araújo, H. M.; Bai, X.; Bailey, A. J.; Balajthy, J.; Balashov, S.; Barry, M. J.; Bauer, P.; Beltrame, P.; Bernard, E. P.; Bernstein, A.; Biesiadzinski, T. P.; Boast, K. E.; Bolozdynya, A. I.; Boulton, E. M.; Bramante, R.; Buckley, J. H.; Bugaev, V. V.; Bunker, R.; Burdin, S.; Busenitz, J. K.; Carels, C.; Carlsmith, D. L.; Carlson, B.; Carmona-Benitez, M. C.; Cascella, M.; Chan, C.; Cherwinka, J. J.; Chiller, A. A.; Chiller, C.; Craddock, W. W.; Currie, A.; Cutter, J. E.; da Cunha, J. P.; Dahl, C. E.; Dasu, S.; Davison, T. J. R.; de Viveiros, L.; Dobi, A.; Dobson, J. E. Y.; Druszkiewicz, E.; Edberg, T. K.; Edwards, B. N.; Edwards, W. R.; Elnimr, M. M.; Emmet, W. T.; Faham, C. H.; Fiorucci, S.; Ford, P.; Francis, V. B.; Fu, C.; Gaitskell, R. J.; Gantos, N. J.; Gehman, V. M.; Gerhard, R. M.; Ghag, C.; Gilchriese, M. G. D.; Gomber, B.; Hall, C. R.; Harris, A.; Haselschwardt, S. J.; Hertel, S. A.; Hoff, M. D.; Holbrook, B.; Holtom, E.; Huang, D. Q.; Hurteau, T. W.; Ignarra, C. M.; Jacobsen, R. G.; Ji, W.; Ji, X.; Johnson, M.; Ju, Y.; Kamdin, K.; Kazkaz, K.; Khaitan, D.; Khazov, A.; Khromov, A. V.; Konovalov, A. M.; Korolkova, E. V.; Kraus, H.; Krebs, H. J.; Kudryavtsev, V. A.; Kumpan, A. V.; Kyre, S.; Larsen, N. A.; Lee, C.; Lenardo, B. G.; Lesko, K. T.; Liao, F. -T.; Lin, J.; Lindote, A.; Lippincott, W. H.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Lopes, M. I.; Lorenzon, W.; Luitz, S.; Majewski, P.; Malling, D. C.; Manalaysay, A. G.; Manenti, L.; Mannino, R. L.; Markley, D. J.; Martin, T. J.; Marzioni, M. F.; McKinsey, D. N.; Mei, D. -M.; Meng, Y.; Miller, E. H.; Mock, J.; Monzani, M. E.; Morad, J. A.; Murphy, A. St. J.; Nelson, H. N.; Neves, F.; Nikkel, J. A.; O'Neill, F. G.; O'Dell, J.; O'Sullivan, K.; Olevitch, M. A.; Oliver-Mallory, K. C.; Palladino, K. J.; Pangilinan, M.; Patton, S. J.; Pease, E. K.; Piepke, A.; Powell, S.; Preece, R. M.; Pushkin, K.; Ratcliff, B. N.; Reichenbacher, J.; Reichhart, L.; Rhyne, C.; Rodrigues, J. P.; Rose, H. J.; Rosero, R.; Saba, J. S.; Sarychev, M.; Schnee, R. W.; Schubnell, M. S. G.; Scovell, P. R.; Shaw, S.; Shutt, T. A.; Silva, C.; Skarpaas, K.; Skulski, W.; Solovov, V. N.; Sorensen, P.; Sosnovtsev, V. V.; Stancu, I.; Stark, M. R.; Stephenson, S.; Stiegler, T. M.; Sumner, T. J.; Sundarnath, K.; Szydagis, M.; Taylor, D. J.; Taylor, W.; Tennyson, B. P.; Terman, P. A.; Thomas, K. J.; Thomson, J. A.; Tiedt, D. R.; To, W. H.; Tomás, A.; Tripathi, M.; Tull, C. E.; Tvrznikova, L.; Uvarov, S.; Va'vra, J.; van der Grinten, M. G. D.; Verbus, J. R.; Vuosalo, C. O.; Waldron, W. L.; Wang, L.; Webb, R. C.; Wei, W. -Z.; While, M.; White, D. T.; Whitis, T. J.; Wisniewski, W. J.; Witherell, M. S.; Wolfs, F. L. H.; Woods, E.; Woodward, D.; Worm, S. D.; Yeh, M.; Yin, J.; Young, S. K.; Zhang, C.
Comments: 278 pages. Submitted to the Department of Energy as part of the documentation for the Critical Decision Number One (CD-1) management process. Report also available by chapter at http://hep.ucsb.edu/LZ/CDR. This version includes corrections of minor typographic errors
Submitted: 2015-09-09, last modified: 2015-09-23
The design and performance of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) detector is described as of March 2015 in this Conceptual Design Report. LZ is a second-generation dark-matter detector with the potential for unprecedented sensitivity to weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) of masses from a few GeV/c2 to hundreds of TeV/c2. With total liquid xenon mass of about 10 tonnes, LZ will be the most sensitive experiment for WIMPs in this mass region by the end of the decade. This report describes in detail the design of the LZ technical systems. Expected backgrounds are quantified and the performance of the experiment is presented. The LZ detector will be located at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in South Dakota. The organization of the LZ Project and a summary of the expected cost and current schedule are given.
[16]  oai:arXiv.org:1307.7549  [pdf] - 717350
The early impact histories of meteorite parent bodies
Comments: 30 pages, 11 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication in Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Submitted: 2013-07-29, last modified: 2013-09-10
We have developed a statistical framework that uses collisional evolution models, shock physics modeling and scaling laws to determine the range of plausible collisional histories for individual meteorite parent bodies. It is likely that those parent bodies that were not catastrophically disrupted sustained hundreds of impacts on their surfaces - compacting, heating, and mixing the outer layers; it is highly unlikely that many parent bodies escaped without any impacts processing the outer few kilometers. The first 10 - 20 Myr were the most important time for impacts, both in terms of the number of impacts and the increase of specific internal energy due to impacts. The model has been applied to evaluate the proposed impact histories of several meteorite parent bodies: up to 10 parent bodies that were not disrupted in the first 100 Myr experienced a vaporizing collision of the type necessary to produce the metal inclusions and chondrules on the CB chondrite parent; around 1 - 5% of bodies that were catastrophically disrupted after 12 Myr sustained impacts at times that match the heating events recorded on the IAB/winonaite parent body; more than 75% of 100 km radius parent bodies which survived past 100 Myr without being disrupted sustained an impact that excavates to the depth required for mixing in the outer layers of the H chondrite parent body; and to protect the magnetic field on the CV chondrite parent body, the crust would have had to have been thick (~ 20 km) in order to prevent it being punctured by impacts.
[17]  oai:arXiv.org:1207.3101  [pdf] - 547371
Post-Impact Thermal Evolution of Porous Planetesimals
Comments: 38 pages, 9 figures, Revised for Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (Sorry, they do not accept LaTeX)
Submitted: 2012-07-12
Impacts between planetesimals have largely been ruled out as a heat source in the early Solar System, by calculations that show them to be an inefficient heat source and unlikely to cause global heating. However, the long-term, localized thermal effects of impacts on planetesimals have never been fully quantified. Here, we simulate a range of impact scenarios between planetesimals to determine the post-impact thermal histories of the parent bodies, and hence the importance of impact heating in the thermal evolution of planetesimals. We find on a local scale that heating material to petrologic type 6 is achievable for a range of impact velocities and initial porosities, and impact melting is possible in porous material at a velocity of > 4 km/s. Burial of heated impactor material beneath the impact crater is common, insulating that material and allowing the parent body to retain the heat for extended periods (~ millions of years). Cooling rates at 773 K are typically 1 - 1000 K/Ma, matching a wide range of measurements of metallographic cooling rates from chondritic materials. While the heating presented here is localized to the impact site, multiple impacts over the lifetime of a parent body are likely to have occurred. Moreover, as most meteorite samples are on the centimeter to meter scale, the localized effects of impact heating cannot be ignored.