Normalized to: D'Orfeuil, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.10829 [pdf] - 1582270
Cosmological constraints on the neutrino mass including systematic
uncertainties
Submitted: 2017-03-31, last modified: 2017-08-11
When combining cosmological and oscillations results to constrain the
neutrino sector, the question of the propagation of systematic uncertainties is
often raised. We address this issue in the context of the derivation of an
upper bound on the sum of the neutrino masses ($\Sigma m_\nu$) with recent
cosmological data. This work is performed within the
${{\mathrm{\Lambda{CDM}}}}$ model extended to $\Sigma m_\nu$, for which we
advocate the use of three mass-degenerate neutrinos. We focus on the study of
systematic uncertainties linked to the foregrounds modelling in CMB data
analysis, and on the impact of the present knowledge of the reionisation
optical depth. This is done through the use of different likelihoods built from
Planck data. Limits on $\Sigma m_\nu$ are derived with various combinations of
data, including the latest Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Type Ia
Supernovae (SN) results. We also discuss the impact of the preference for
current CMB data for amplitudes of the gravitational lensing distortions higher
than expected within the ${{\mathrm{\Lambda{CDM}}}}$ model, and add the Planck
CMB lensing. We then derive a robust upper limit: $\Sigma m_\nu< 0.17\hbox{ eV
at }95\% \hbox{CL}$, including 0.01 eV of foreground systematics. We also
discuss the neutrino mass repartition and show that today's data do not allow
one to disentangle normal from inverted hierarchy. The impact on the other
cosmological parameters is also reported, for different assumptions on the
neutrino mass repartition, and different high and low multipole CMB
likelihoods.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.09730 [pdf] - 1580303
Cosmology with the CMB temperature-polarization correlation
Submitted: 2016-09-30, last modified: 2017-02-24
We demonstrate that the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature-polarization cross-correlation provides accurate and robust
constraints on cosmological parameters. We compare them with the results from
temperature or polarization and investigate the impact of foregrounds, cosmic
variance, and instrumental noise. This analysis makes use of the Planck
high-multipole HiLLiPOP likelihood based on angular power spectra, which takes
into account systematics from the instrument and foreground residuals directly
modelled using Planck measurements. The temperature-polarization correlation
(TE) spectrum is less contaminated by astrophysical emissions than the
temperature power spectrum (TT), allowing constraints that are less sensitive
to foreground uncertainties to be derived. For {\Lambda}CDM parameters, TE
gives very competitive results compared to TT. For basic {\Lambda}CDM model
extensions (such as AL, {\Sigma}m{\nu}, or Neff ), it is still limited by the
instrumental noise level in the polarization maps.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.07600 [pdf] - 1530349
Relieving tensions related to the lensing of CMB temperature power
spectra
Submitted: 2015-10-26, last modified: 2016-10-19
The angular power spectra of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
temperature anisotropies reconstructed from Planck data seem to present too
much gravitational lensing distortion. This is quantified by the control
parameter $A_L$ that should be compatible with unity for a standard cosmology.
With the Class Boltzmann solver and the profile-likelihood method, for this
parameter we measure a 2.6$\sigma$ shift from 1 using the Planck public
likelihoods. We show that, owing to strong correlations with the reionization
optical depth $\tau$ and the primordial perturbation amplitude $A_s$, a
$\sim2\sigma$ tension on $\tau$ also appears between the results obtained with
the low ($\ell\leq 30$) and high ($30<\ell\lesssim 2500$) multipoles
likelihoods. With Hillipop, another high-$\ell$ likelihood built from Planck
data, this difference is lowered to $1.3\sigma$. In this case, the $A_L$ value
is still in disagreement with unity by $2.2\sigma$, suggesting a non-trivial
effect of the correlations between cosmological and nuisance parameters. To
better constrain the nuisance foregrounds parameters, we include the very high
$\ell$ measurements of the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and South Pole
Telescope (SPT) experiments and obtain $A_L = 1.03 \pm 0.08$. The
Hillipop+ACT+SPT likelihood estimate of the optical depth is
$\tau=0.052\pm{0.035,}$ which is now fully compatible with the low $\ell$
likelihood determination. After showing the robustness of our results with
various combinations, we investigate the reasons for this improvement that
results from a better determination of the whole set of foregrounds parameters.
We finally provide estimates of the $\Lambda$CDM parameters with our combined
CMB data likelihood.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.04561 [pdf] - 1498464
A new method to test the hypothesis of isotropy of the ultrahigh energy
cosmic ray flux
Submitted: 2016-10-14, last modified: 2016-10-17
We developed a new method in order to detect and quantify a potential
anisotropy in the ultrahigh energy cosmic ray flux. The proposed method is a
new statistical tool based upon the percolation process that is used in physics
to describe the formation of long-range connectivity in random systems.
Specifically, we investigate the dynamic of the arrangement of cosmic rays into
clusters as a function of the maximum angular separation between the arrival
directions of a pair of events. In a first step, we characterize the
percolation process and extract the most sensitive observable through
Monte-Carlo simulations. We then apply the algorithm to the data taken by the
array of surface detectors of the Pierre Auger Observatory up to January 2010.
The strongest signal appears at an energy threshold of 56.74 EeV and an angular
scale of 4 for which the hypothesis of isotropy of the arrival directions of
the highest-energy cosmic rays is rejected at a nearly 90% C.L.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.02964 [pdf] - 1435798
Agnostic cosmology in the CAMEL framework
Submitted: 2016-07-11
Cosmological parameter estimation is traditionally performed in the Bayesian
context. By adopting an "agnostic" statistical point of view, we show the
interest of confronting the Bayesian results to a frequentist approach based on
profile-likelihoods. To this purpose, we have developed the Cosmological
Analysis with a Minuit Exploration of the Likelihood ("CAMEL") software.
Written from scratch in pure C++, emphasis was put in building a clean and
carefully-designed project where new data and/or cosmological computations can
be easily included.
CAMEL incorporates the latest cosmological likelihoods and gives access from
the very same input file to several estimation methods: (i) A high quality
Maximum Likelihood Estimate (a.k.a "best fit") using MINUIT ; (ii) profile
likelihoods, (iii) a new implementation of an Adaptive Metropolis MCMC
algorithm that relieves the burden of reconstructing the proposal distribution.
We present here those various statistical techniques and roll out a full
use-case that can then used as a tutorial. We revisit the $\Lambda$CDM
parameters determination with the latest Planck data and give results with both
methodologies. Furthermore, by comparing the Bayesian and frequentist
approaches, we discuss a "likelihood volume effect" that affects the optical
reionization depth when analyzing the high multipoles part of the Planck data.
The software, used in several Planck data analyzes, is available from
http://camel.in2p3.fr. Using it does not require advanced C++ skills.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.02704 [pdf] - 1483210
Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness
of parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Gerbino, M.;
Giard, M.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Lilley, M.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Mottet, S.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Serra, P.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, F.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-07-09, last modified: 2016-06-30
This paper presents the Planck 2015 likelihoods, statistical descriptions of
the 2-point correlations of CMB data, using the hybrid approach employed
previously: pixel-based at $\ell<30$ and a Gaussian approximation to the
distribution of spectra at higher $\ell$. The main improvements are the use of
more and better processed data and of Planck polarization data, and more
detailed foreground and instrumental models, allowing further checks and
enhanced immunity to systematics. Progress in foreground modelling enables a
larger sky fraction. Improvements in processing and instrumental models further
reduce uncertainties. For temperature, we perform an analysis of end-to-end
instrumental simulations fed into the data processing pipeline; this does not
reveal biases from residual instrumental systematics. The $\Lambda$CDM
cosmological model continues to offer a very good fit to Planck data. The slope
of primordial scalar fluctuations, $n_s$, is confirmed smaller than unity at
more than 5{\sigma} from Planck alone. We further validate robustness against
specific extensions to the baseline cosmology. E.g., the effective number of
neutrino species remains compatible with the canonical value of 3.046. This
first detailed analysis of Planck polarization concentrates on E modes. At low
$\ell$ we use temperature at all frequencies and a subset of polarization. The
frequency range improves CMB-foreground separation. Within the baseline model
this requires a reionization optical depth $\tau=0.078\pm0.019$, significantly
lower than without high-frequency data for explicit dust monitoring. At high
$\ell$ we detect residual errors in E, typically O($\mu$K$^2$); we recommend
temperature alone as the high-$\ell$ baseline. Nevertheless, Planck high-$\ell$
polarization allows a separate determination of $\Lambda$CDM parameters
consistent with those from temperature alone.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01589 [pdf] - 1483195
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit, A.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Desert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Dore, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Ensslin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Farhang, M.;
Fergusson, J.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Heraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerlow, E.;
Gonzalez-Nuevo, J.;
Gorski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versille, S.;
Hernandez-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihanen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lahteenmaki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vornle, M.;
Lopez-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macias-Perez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martinez-Gonzalez, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McGehee, P.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Millea, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschenes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Norgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prezeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubino-Martin, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Turler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2016-06-17
We present results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature
and polarization anisotropies of the CMB. These data are consistent with the
six-parameter inflationary LCDM cosmology. From the Planck temperature and
lensing data, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H0= (67.8 +/- 0.9)
km/s/Mpc, a matter density parameter Omega_m = 0.308 +/- 0.012 and a scalar
spectral index with n_s = 0.968 +/- 0.006. (We quote 68% errors on measured
parameters and 95% limits on other parameters.) Combined with Planck
temperature and lensing data, Planck LFI polarization measurements lead to a
reionization optical depth of tau = 0.066 +/- 0.016. Combining Planck with
other astrophysical data we find N_ eff = 3.15 +/- 0.23 for the effective
number of relativistic degrees of freedom and the sum of neutrino masses is
constrained to < 0.23 eV. Spatial curvature is found to be |Omega_K| < 0.005.
For LCDM we find a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio of r <0.11 consistent
with the B-mode constraints from an analysis of BICEP2, Keck Array, and Planck
(BKP) data. Adding the BKP data leads to a tighter constraint of r < 0.09. We
find no evidence for isocurvature perturbations or cosmic defects. The equation
of state of dark energy is constrained to w = -1.006 +/- 0.045. Standard big
bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the Planck LCDM cosmology are in excellent
agreement with observations. We investigate annihilating dark matter and
deviations from standard recombination, finding no evidence for new physics.
The Planck results for base LCDM are in agreement with BAO data and with the
JLA SNe sample. However the amplitude of the fluctuations is found to be higher
than inferred from rich cluster counts and weak gravitational lensing. Apart
from these tensions, the base LCDM cosmology provides an excellent description
of the Planck CMB observations and many other astrophysical data sets.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01582 [pdf] - 1486774
Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Akrami, Y.;
Alves, M. I. R.;
Arnaud, M.;
Arroja, F.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Ballardini, M.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Basak, S.;
Battaglia, P.;
Battaner, E.;
Battye, R.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoît, A.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bertincourt, B.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Carvalho, P.;
Casaponsa, B.;
Castex, G.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Chluba, J.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Church, S.;
Clemens, M.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Comis, B.;
Contreras, D.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Cruz, M.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Di Valentino, E.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Eisenhardt, P. R. M.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Fantaye, Y.;
Farhang, M.;
Feeney, S.;
Fergusson, J.;
Fernandez-Cobos, R.;
Feroz, F.;
Finelli, F.;
Florido, E.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschet, C.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Frolov, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Gauthier, C.;
Génova-Santos, R. T.;
Gerbino, M.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Giusarma, E.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Grainge, K. J. B.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Gudmundsson, J. E.;
Hamann, J.;
Handley, W.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Heavens, A.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huang, Z.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Ilić, S.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jin, T.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Karakci, A.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kiiveri, K.;
Kim, J.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Langer, M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Jeune, M. Le;
Leahy, J. P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leonardi, R.;
León-Tavares, J.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Lewis, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
Lindholm, V.;
Liu, H.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Ma, Y. -Z.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maggio, G.;
Mak, D. S. Y.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Marchini, A.;
Marcos-Caballero, A.;
Marinucci, D.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martinelli, M.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
McEwen, J. D.;
McGehee, P.;
Mei, S.;
Meinhold, P. R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Melin, J. -B.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mikkelsen, K.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Molinari, D.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Moreno, R.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Mottet, S.;
Müenchmeyer, M.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Narimani, A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nastasi, A.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Negrello, M.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Olamaie, M.;
Oppermann, N.;
Orlando, E.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Paci, F.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Pandolfi, S.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Peel, M.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Pelkonen, V. -M.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrott, Y. C.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pogosyan, D.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prézeau, G.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Racine, B.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Roman, M.;
Romelli, E.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Rotti, A.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Ruiz-Granados, B.;
Rumsey, C.;
Rusholme, B.;
Said, N.;
Salvatelli, V.;
Salvati, L.;
Sandri, M.;
Sanghera, H. S.;
Santos, D.;
Saunders, R. D. E.;
Sauvé, A.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Schaefer, B. M.;
Schammel, M. P.;
Scott, D.;
Seiffert, M. D.;
Serra, P.;
Shellard, E. P. S.;
Shimwell, T. W.;
Shiraishi, M.;
Smith, K.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Stern, D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Strong, A. W.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutter, P.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Tavagnacco, D.;
Terenzi, L.;
Texier, D.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Troja, A.;
Trombetti, T.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Türler, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vassallo, T.;
Vidal, M.;
Viel, M.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Walter, B.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
Welikala, N.;
Weller, J.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Wilkinson, A.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zibin, J. P.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2015-02-05, last modified: 2015-08-09
The European Space Agency's Planck satellite, dedicated to studying the early
Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched 14~May 2009 and scanned the
microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12~August 2009 and
23~October 2013. In February~2015, ESA and the Planck Collaboration released
the second set of cosmology products based on data from the entire Planck
mission, including both temperature and polarization, along with a set of
scientific and technical papers and a web-based explanatory supplement. This
paper gives an overview of the main characteristics of the data and the data
products in the release, as well as the associated cosmological and
astrophysical science results and papers. The science products include maps of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect,
and diffuse foregrounds in temperature and polarization, catalogues of compact
Galactic and extragalactic sources (including separate catalogues of
Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters and Galactic cold clumps), and extensive simulations
of signals and noise used in assessing the performance of the analysis methods
and assessment of uncertainties. The likelihood code used to assess
cosmological models against the Planck data are described, as well as a CMB
lensing likelihood. Scientific results include cosmological parameters deriving
from CMB power spectra, gravitational lensing, and cluster counts, as well as
constraints on inflation, non-Gaussianity, primordial magnetic fields, dark
energy, and modified gravity.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.5738 [pdf] - 1354768
Planck intermediate results. XXX. The angular power spectrum of
polarized dust emission at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes
Planck Collaboration;
Adam, R.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Bartolo, N.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bonavera, L.;
Bond, J. R.;
Borrill, J.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Boulanger, F.;
Bracco, A.;
Bucher, M.;
Burigana, C.;
Butler, R. C.;
Calabrese, E.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Challinor, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chary, R. -R.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Combet, C.;
Couchot, F.;
Coulais, A.;
Crill, B. P.;
Curto, A.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davies, R. D.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Désert, F. -X.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dolag, K.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Ducout, A.;
Dunkley, J.;
Dupac, X.;
Efstathiou, G.;
Elsner, F.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Falgarone, E.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Fraisse, A. A.;
Franceschi, E.;
Frejsel, A.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Ghosh, T.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
Gjerløw, E.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gratton, S.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Guillet, V.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Hanson, D.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Helou, G.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Hurier, G.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jewell, J.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Krachmalnicoff, N.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Lattanzi, M.;
Lawrence, C. R.;
Leahy, J. P.;
Leonardi, R.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Levrier, F.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Mangilli, A.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Mortlock, D.;
Moss, A.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Netterfield, C. B.;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paladini, R.;
Paoletti, D.;
Partridge, B.;
Pasian, F.;
Patanchon, G.;
Pearson, T. J.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Ponthieu, N.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Prunet, S.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Reach, W. T.;
Rebolo, R.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Renzi, A.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Rossetti, M.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Santos, D.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Scott, D.;
Soler, J. D.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Stolyarov, V.;
Stompor, R.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sunyaev, R.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Tuovinen, J.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vibert, L.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
Watson, R.;
Wehus, I. K.;
White, M.;
White, S. D. M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2014-09-19, last modified: 2014-12-08
The polarized thermal emission from Galactic dust is the main foreground
present in measurements of the polarization of the cosmic microwave background
(CMB) at frequencies above 100GHz. We exploit the Planck HFI polarization data
from 100 to 353GHz to measure the dust angular power spectra $C_\ell^{EE,BB}$
over the range $40<\ell<600$ well away from the Galactic plane. These will
bring new insights into interstellar dust physics and a precise determination
of the level of contamination for CMB polarization experiments. We show that
statistical properties of the emission can be characterized over large
fractions of the sky using $C_\ell$. For the dust, they are well described by
power laws in $\ell$ with exponents $\alpha^{EE,BB}=-2.42\pm0.02$. The
amplitudes of the polarization $C_\ell$ vary with the average brightness in a
way similar to the intensity ones. The dust polarization frequency dependence
is consistent with modified blackbody emission with $\beta_d=1.59$ and
$T_d=19.6$K. We find a systematic ratio between the amplitudes of the Galactic
$B$- and $E$-modes of 0.5. We show that even in the faintest dust-emitting
regions there are no "clean" windows where primordial CMB $B$-mode polarization
could be measured without subtraction of dust emission. Finally, we investigate
the level of dust polarization in the BICEP2 experiment field. Extrapolation of
the Planck 353GHz data to 150GHz gives a dust power
$\ell(\ell+1)C_\ell^{BB}/(2\pi)$ of $1.32\times10^{-2}\mu$K$_{CMB}^2$ over the
$40<\ell<120$ range; the statistical uncertainty is $\pm0.29$ and there is an
additional uncertainty (+0.28,-0.24) from the extrapolation, both in the same
units. This is the same magnitude as reported by BICEP2 over this $\ell$ range,
which highlights the need for assessment of the polarized dust signal even in
the cleanest windows of the sky.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.1119 [pdf] - 862470
Anisotropy expectations for ultra-high-energy cosmic rays with future
high statistics experiments
Submitted: 2014-01-06
UHECRs have attracted a lot of attention due to their challengingly high
energies and their potential value to constrain physical processes and
astrophysical parameters in the most energetic sources of the universe. Current
detectors have failed to detect significant anisotropies which had been
expected to allow source identification. Some indications about the UHECR
composition, which may become heavier at the highest energies, has even put
into question the possibility that such a goal could be achieved soon.
We investigate the potential value of a new-generation detector, with 10
times larger exposure, to overcome the current situation and make significant
progress in the detection of anisotropies and thus in the study of UHECRs. We
take as an example the expected performances of the JEM-EUSO, assuming a
uniform full-sky coverage with a total exposure of 300,000 km2 sr yr.
We simulate realistic UHECR sky maps for a wide range of possible
astrophysical scenarios allowed by the current constraints, taking into account
the energy losses and photo-dissociation of the UHECRs, as well as their
deflections by magnetic fields. These sky maps, built for the expected
statistics of JEM-EUSO as well as for the current Auger statistics, as a
reference, are analyzed from the point of view of their intrinsic anisotropies,
using the two-point correlation function. A statistical study of the resulting
anisotropies is performed for each astrophysical scenario, varying the UHECR
source composition and spectrum as well as the source density.
We find that significant anisotropies are expected to be detected by a
next-generation UHECR detector, for essentially all the astrophysical scenarios
studied, and give precise, quantitative meaning to this statement. Our results
show that a gain of one order of magnitude in exposure would make a significant
difference compared to the existing detectors.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.1657 [pdf] - 840463
Planck intermediate results. XVI. Profile likelihoods for cosmological
parameters
Planck Collaboration;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Aghanim, N.;
Arnaud, M.;
Ashdown, M.;
Aumont, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Banday, A. J.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Bartlett, J. G.;
Battaner, E.;
Benabed, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernard, J. -P.;
Bersanelli, M.;
Bielewicz, P.;
Bobin, J.;
Bonaldi, A.;
Bond, J. R.;
Bouchet, F. R.;
Burigana, C.;
Cardoso, J. -F.;
Catalano, A.;
Chamballu, A.;
Chiang, H. C.;
Christensen, P. R.;
Clements, D. L.;
Colombi, S.;
Colombo, L. P. L.;
Couchot, F.;
Cuttaia, F.;
Danese, L.;
Davis, R. J.;
de Bernardis, P.;
de Rosa, A.;
de Zotti, G.;
Delabrouille, J.;
Dickinson, C.;
Diego, J. M.;
Dole, H.;
Donzelli, S.;
Doré, O.;
Douspis, M.;
Dupac, X.;
Enßlin, T. A.;
Eriksen, H. K.;
Finelli, F.;
Forni, O.;
Frailis, M.;
Franceschi, E.;
Galeotta, S.;
Galli, S.;
Ganga, K.;
Giard, M.;
Giraud-Héraud, Y.;
González-Nuevo, J.;
Górski, K. M.;
Gregorio, A.;
Gruppuso, A.;
Hansen, F. K.;
Harrison, D.;
Henrot-Versillé, S.;
Hernández-Monteagudo, C.;
Herranz, D.;
Hildebrandt, S. R.;
Hivon, E.;
Hobson, M.;
Holmes, W. A.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hovest, W.;
Huffenberger, K. M.;
Jaffe, A. H.;
Jaffe, T. R.;
Jones, W. C.;
Juvela, M.;
Keihänen, E.;
Keskitalo, R.;
Kisner, T. S.;
Kneissl, R.;
Knoche, J.;
Knox, L.;
Kunz, M.;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Lagache, G.;
Lähteenmäki, A.;
Lamarre, J. -M.;
Lasenby, A.;
Leonardi, R.;
Liddle, A.;
Liguori, M.;
Lilje, P. B.;
Linden-Vørnle, M.;
López-Caniego, M.;
Lubin, P. M.;
Macías-Pérez, J. F.;
Maffei, B.;
Maino, D.;
Mandolesi, N.;
Maris, M.;
Martin, P. G.;
Martínez-González, E.;
Masi, S.;
Massardi, M.;
Matarrese, S.;
Mazzotta, P.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Mendes, L.;
Mennella, A.;
Migliaccio, M.;
Mitra, S.;
Miville-Deschênes, M. -A.;
Moneti, A.;
Montier, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Munshi, D.;
Murphy, J. A.;
Naselsky, P.;
Nati, F.;
Natoli, P.;
Noviello, F.;
Novikov, D.;
Novikov, I.;
Oxborrow, C. A.;
Pagano, L.;
Pajot, F.;
Paoletti, D.;
Pasian, F.;
Perdereau, O.;
Perotto, L.;
Perrotta, F.;
Pettorino, V.;
Piacentini, F.;
Piat, M.;
Pierpaoli, E.;
Pietrobon, D.;
Plaszczynski, S.;
Pointecouteau, E.;
Polenta, G.;
Popa, L.;
Pratt, G. W.;
Puget, J. -L.;
Rachen, J. P.;
Rebolo, R.;
Reinecke, M.;
Remazeilles, M.;
Renault, C.;
Ricciardi, S.;
Riller, T.;
Ristorcelli, I.;
Rocha, G.;
Rosset, C.;
Roudier, G.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Rubiño-Martín, J. A.;
Rusholme, B.;
Sandri, M.;
Savelainen, M.;
Savini, G.;
Spencer, L. D.;
Spinelli, M.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Sureau, F.;
Sutton, D.;
Suur-Uski, A. -S.;
Sygnet, J. -F.;
Tauber, J. A.;
Terenzi, L.;
Toffolatti, L.;
Tomasi, M.;
Tristram, M.;
Tucci, M.;
Umana, G.;
Valenziano, L.;
Valiviita, J.;
Van Tent, B.;
Vielva, P.;
Villa, F.;
Wade, L. A.;
Wandelt, B. D.;
White, M.;
Yvon, D.;
Zacchei, A.;
Zonca, A.
Submitted: 2013-11-07, last modified: 2013-12-06
We explore the 2013 Planck likelihood function with a high-precision
multi-dimensional minimizer (Minuit). This allows a refinement of the
Lambda-cdm best-fit solution with respect to previously-released results, and
the construction of frequentist confidence intervals using profile likelihoods.
The agreement with the cosmological results from the Bayesian framework is
excellent, demonstrating the robustness of the Planck results to the
statistical methodology. We investigate the inclusion of neutrino masses, where
more significant differences may appear due to the non-Gaussian nature of the
posterior mass distribution. By applying the Feldman--Cousins prescription, we
again obtain results very similar to those of the Bayesian methodology.
However, the profile-likelihood analysis of the CMB combination
(Planck+WP+highL) reveals a minimum well within the unphysical negative-mass
region. We show that inclusion of the Planck CMB-lensing information
regularizes this issue, and provide a robust frequentist upper limit $M_\nu <
0.26 eV$ ($95%$ confidence) from the CMB+lensing+BAO data combination.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.6734 [pdf] - 1152436
Precise measurement of the absolute fluorescence yield of the 337 nm
band in atmospheric gases
AIRFLY Collaboration;
Ave, M.;
Bohacova, M.;
Curry, E.;
Di Carlo, P.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Luis, P. Facal San;
Gonzales, D.;
Hojvat, C.;
Hörandel, J.;
Hrabovsky, M.;
Iarlori, M.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Klages, H.;
Kleifges, M.;
Kuehn, F.;
Li, S.;
Monasor, M.;
Nozka, L.;
Palatka, M.;
Petrera, S.;
Privitera, P.;
Ridky, J.;
Rizi, V.;
D'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Salamida, F.;
Schovanek, P.;
Smida, R.;
Spinka, H.;
Ulrich, A.;
Verzi, V.;
Williams, C.
Submitted: 2012-10-24
A measurement of the absolute fluorescence yield of the 337 nm nitrogen band,
relevant to ultra-high energy cosmic ray (UHECR) detectors, is reported. Two
independent calibrations of the fluorescence emission induced by a 120 GeV
proton beam were employed: Cherenkov light from the beam particle and
calibrated light from a nitrogen laser. The fluorescence yield in air at a
pressure of 1013 hPa and temperature of 293 K was found to be $Y_{337} =
5.61\pm 0.06_{stat} \pm 0.21_{syst}$ photons/MeV. When compared to the
fluorescence yield currently used by UHECR experiments, this measurement
improves the uncertainty by a factor of three, and has a significant impact on
the determination of the energy scale of the cosmic ray spectrum.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.5785 [pdf] - 570201
Search for microwave emission from ultrahigh energy cosmic rays
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Berlin, A.;
Bogdan, M.;
Boháčová, M.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Carvalho, W. R.;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
Luis, P. Facal San;
Genat, J. F.;
Hollon, N.;
Mills, E.;
Monasor, M.;
Privitera, P.;
Reyes, L. C.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Santos, E. M.;
Wayne, S.;
Williams, C.;
Zas, E.;
Zhou, J.
Submitted: 2012-05-25, last modified: 2012-10-01
We present a search for microwave emission from air showers induced by
ultrahigh energy cosmic rays with the microwave detection of air showers
experiment. No events were found, ruling out a wide range of power flux and
coherence of the putative emission, including those suggested by recent
laboratory measurements.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.2734 [pdf] - 1150665
The MIDAS telescope for microwave detection of ultra-high energy cosmic
rays
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Soares, E. Amaral;
Berlin, A.;
Bogdan, M.;
Boháčová, M.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Carvalho, W. R.;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
Luis, P. Facal San;
Genat, J. F.;
Hollon, N.;
Mills, E.;
Monasor, M.;
Privitera, P.;
de Castro, A. Ramos;
Reyes, L. C.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Santos, E. M.;
Wayne, S.;
Williams, C.;
Zas, E.;
Zhou, J.
Submitted: 2012-08-13
We present the design, implementation and data taking performance of the
MIcrowave Detection of Air Showers (MIDAS) experiment, a large field of view
imaging telescope designed to detect microwave radiation from extensive air
showers induced by ultra-high energy cosmic rays. This novel technique may
bring a tenfold increase in detector duty cycle when compared to the standard
fluorescence technique based on detection of ultraviolet photons. The MIDAS
telescope consists of a 4.5 m diameter dish with a 53-pixel receiver camera,
instrumented with feed horns operating in the commercial extended C-Band (3.4
-- 4.2 GHz). A self-trigger capability is implemented in the digital
electronics. The main objectives of this first prototype of the MIDAS telescope
- to validate the telescope design, and to demonstrate a large detector duty
cycle - were successfully accomplished in a dedicated data taking run at the
University of Chicago campus prior to installation at the Pierre Auger
Observatory.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.6321 [pdf] - 1083733
The Microwave Air Yield Beam Experiment (MAYBE): measurement of GHz
radiation for Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays detection
Monasor, M.;
Bohacova, M.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Cataldi, G.;
Chemerisov, S.;
Neto, J. R. T. De Mello;
Luis, P. Facal San;
Fox, B.;
Gorham, P. W.;
Hojvat, C.;
Hollon, N.;
Meyhandan, R.;
Reyes, L. C.;
D'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Santos, E. M.;
Pochez, J.;
Privitera, P.;
Spinka, H.;
Verzi, V.;
Williams, C.;
Zhou, J.
Submitted: 2011-08-31
We present first measurements by MAYBE of microwave emission from an electron
beam induced air plasma, performed at the electron Van de Graaff facility of
the Argonne National Laboratory. Coherent radio Cherenkov, a major background
in a previous beam experiment, is not produced by the 3 MeV beam, which
simplifies the interpretation of the data. Radio emission is studied over a
wide range of frequencies between 3 and 12 GHz. This measurement provides
further insight on microwave emission from extensive air showers as a novel
detection technique for Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.3799 [pdf] - 368083
Precise Measurement of the Absolute Yield of Fluorescence Photons in
Atmospheric Gases
AIRFLY Collaboration;
Ave, M.;
Boháčová, M.;
Daumiller, K.;
Di Carlo, P.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Luis, P. Facal San;
Gonzales, D.;
Hojvat, C.;
Hörandel, J. R.;
Hrabovský, M.;
Iarlori, M.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Klages, H.;
Kleifges, M.;
Kuehn, F.;
Monasor, M.;
Nožka, L.;
Palatka, M.;
Petrera, S.;
Privitera, P.;
Ridky, J.;
Rizi, V.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouillé;
Salamida, F.;
Schovánek, P.;
Šmida, R.;
Spinka, H.;
Ulrich, A.;
Verzi, V.;
Williams, C.
Submitted: 2011-01-19
We have performed a measurement of the absolute yield of fluorescence photons
at the Fermilab Test Beam. A systematic uncertainty at 5% level was achieved by
the use of Cherenkov radiation as a reference calibration light source. A
cross-check was performed by an independent calibration using a laser light
source. A significant improvement on the energy scale uncertainty of Ultra-High
Energy Cosmic Rays is expected.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.5224 [pdf] - 1041514
The MIDAS experiment: A prototype for the microwave emission of
Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays
Monasor, M.;
Alekotte, I.;
Alvarez-Muniz, J.;
Berlin, A.;
Bertou, X.;
Bodgan, M.;
Bohacova, M.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Carvalho, W.;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
Genat, J. F.;
Luis, P. Facal San;
Mills, E.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Wayne, S.;
Reyes, L. C.;
Santos, E. M.;
Privitera, P.;
Williams, C.;
Zas, E.
Submitted: 2010-10-25, last modified: 2010-10-27
Recent measurements suggest that extensive air showers initiated by
ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECR) emit signals in the microwave band of the
electromagnetic spectrum caused by the collisions of the free-electrons with
the atmospheric neutral molecules in the plasma produced by the passage of the
shower. Such emission is isotropic and could allow the detection of air showers
with 100% duty cycle and a calorimetric-like energy measurement, a significant
improvement over current detection techniques. We have built MIDAS (MIcrowave
Detection of Air Showers), a prototype of microwave detector, which consists of
a 4.5 m diameter antenna with a cluster of 53 feed-horns in the 4 GHz range.
The details of the prototype and first results will be presented.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1010.2734 [pdf] - 245897
The MIDAS Experiment: A New Technique for the Detection of Extensive Air
Showers
Williams, C.;
Berlin, A.;
Bogdan, M.;
Bohacova, M.;
Facal, P.;
Genat, J. F.;
Mills, E.;
Monasor, M.;
Privitera, P.;
Reyes, L. C.;
d'Orfeuil, B. Rouille;
Wayne, S.;
Alekotte, I.;
Bertou, X.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
Santos, E. M.;
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Carvalho, W.;
Zas, E.
Submitted: 2010-10-13, last modified: 2010-10-22
Recent measurements suggest free electrons created in ultra-high energy
cosmic ray extensive air showers (EAS) can interact with neutral air molecules
producing Bremsstrahlung radiation in the microwave regime. The microwave
radiation produced is expected to scale with the number of free electrons in
the shower, which itself is a function of the energy of the primary particle
and atmospheric depth. Using these properties a calorimetric measurement of the
EAS is possible. This technique is analogous to fluorescence detection with the
added benefit of a nearly 100% duty cycle and practically no atmospheric
attenuation. The Microwave Detection of Air Showers (MIDAS) prototype is
currently being developed at the University of Chicago. MIDAS consists of a 53
feed receiver operating in the 3.4 to 4.2 GHz band. The camera is deployed on a
4.5 meter parabolic reflector and is instrumented with high speed power
detectors and autonomous FPGA trigger electronics. We present the current
status of the MIDAS instrument and an outlook for future development.