Normalized to: D'Armiento, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.2471 [pdf] - 913043
UHECR bending, clustering and decaying feeding gamma anisotropy
Submitted: 2012-08-12
Ultra High Cosmic Rays) made by He-like lightest nuclei might fit clustering
along Cen A. Moreover He like UHECR nuclei explain Virgo absence because the
light nuclei fragility and opacity above a few Mpc. We foresaw (2009) that
UHECR He from Cen-A AGN being fragile should partially fragment into
secondaries at tens EeV multiplet (D,He^{3},p) as the recent twin multiplet
discovered ones (AUGER-ICRC-2011), at 20 EeV along Cen A UHECR clustering. We
suggest that UHECR are also heavy radioactive galactic nuclei as Ni^{56},
Ni^{57} and Co^{57} widely bent (tens degree up to 100 degrees) by galactic
fields. UHECR radioactivity and decay in flight at hundreds keV is boosted (by
huge Lorentz factor (billion) leading to PeVs electrons and consequent
synchrotron TeVs gamma offering UHECR-TeV correlated sky anisotropy. Electron
and tau neutrinos secondaries at PeVs maybe the first signature of such
expected radioactive secondary tail.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.3245 [pdf] - 565625
Beaming neutrino and antineutrinos across the Earth to disentangle
neutrino mixing parameters
Submitted: 2010-12-15, last modified: 2012-08-08
A MINOS result seemed to hint a different anti-neutrino mass splitting and
mixing angle with respect to the neutrino ones, offering a hint for a CPT
violation in lepton sector. However more recent MINOS data reduced the
neutrino-antineutrino differences leading to a narrow discrepancy almost
compatible with no CPT violation, hard to be disentangled. Moreover last a few
years of OPERA activity on tau appearance is still un-probed (one unique
event). Both flavor muon-tau mixing, tau appearance and eventual CPT violation
disentanglement need more tools to be enhanced. Atmospheric muon neutrino
spectra and anisotropy in Deep Core at ten-tens GeV (yet unpublished) may test
the muon-tau conversion but they can hardly reveal such last tiny MINOS CPT
asymmetry. We show how the longest baseline neutrino oscillation available,
crossing most of the Earth diameter, within an OPERA-like experiment from CERN
(or FERMILAB) to ICECUBE-Deep Core neutrino detector at 21 GeV energy, may at
best disentangle even last tiny CPT violation (within 6 sigma a year) while
testing at highest rate tau-antitau appearance. We propose the muon neutrino
disappearance or (for any CPT violation) the partial anti-muon appearance at
the longest distances. Such a tuned detection experiment may lead to a clear
and strong signature of tau or anti-tau generation (even within its neutral
current noise background events): nearly one antitau or two tau a day. The tau
appearance signal is above (or within) 10 sigma a year, even for 1% OPERA-like
experiment. Peculiar configurations for theta_13 angle test and hierarchy
neutrino mass test may also be addressed by a Deep Core-PINGU array detector
observing electron neutrino shower at 6 GeV neutrino energy windows.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.5368 [pdf] - 524850
Inconsistence of super-luminal Cern-Opera neutrino speed with observed
SN1987A burst and neutrino mixing for any imaginary neutrino mass
Submitted: 2011-09-25, last modified: 2012-03-05
We tried to fit in any way the recent Opera-Cern claims of a neutrino
super-luminal speed with observed Supernova SN1987A neutrino burst and all (or
most) neutrino flavor oscillation. We considered three main frame-works: (1) A
tachyon imaginary neutrino mass, whose timing is nevertheless in conflict with
observed IMB-Kamiokande SN1987A burst by thousands of billion times longer. (2)
An ad hoc anti-tachyon model whose timing shrinkage may accommodate SN1987A
burst but greatly disagree with energy independent Cern-Opera super-luminal
speed. (3) A split neutrino flavor speed (among a common real mass relativistic
neutrino electron component and a super-luminal neutrino {\mu}) in an ad hoc
frozen speed scenario that is leading to the prompt neutrino de-coherence and
the rapid flavor mixing (between electron and muon ones) that are in conflict
with most oscillation records. Therefore we concluded that an error must be
hidden in Opera-Cern time calibration (as indeed recent rumors seem to
confirm). We are also reminding the relevance of the guaranteed minimal
atmospheric neutrino mass whose detection may be achieved by a milliseconds
graviton-neutrino split time delay among gravity burst and neutronization
neutrino peak in any future SN explosion in Andromeda recordable in Megaton
neutrino detector.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.2642 [pdf] - 966469
Foreseeing Neutrino spectra in Deep Core
Submitted: 2011-03-14
Atmospheric muon neutrino in Deep Core (whose rate and spectra might be soon
available) should exhibit a suppression (due to tens GeV up-going muon neutrino
converted into tau flavor) that must be imprinted in out-coming rate spectra.
We estimate here our independent muon neutrino spectra based on SK and its
projected record on Deep Core Channels. Our estimate (based on cosmic rays,
muon records and tested Super-Kamiokande (SK) data) differs both in shape and
in rate from other previous published spectra. The expected rate might exhibit
a minimum near channel 6 of Deep Core strings and it should manifest strong
signature for flavor mixing (mostly between channel 4--15)and a relevant
anomaly for eventual CPT violation (MINOS like) written at channel 3--6,whose
statistical weight (mainly at channel 5) might soon confirm or dismiss MINOS
CPT claim. At the flux minimum around channel 6, (a flux suppressed respect the
non oscillated case at least by an order of magnitude) the atmospheric neutrino
paucity offers a better windows to a twenty GeV Neutrino Astronomy. Therefore
by doubling the string array we may foresee a richer rate and a more complete
(zenith and azimuth) atmospheric neutrino distribution and an exciting first
twenty GeV Astronomy.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.1991 [pdf] - 1051311
A 20 GeVs transparent neutrino astronomy from the North Pole?
Submitted: 2011-01-10
Muon neutrino astronomy is drown within a polluted atmospheric neutrino
noise. However at 24 GeV energy atmospheric muon neutrinos, while rising
vertically along the terrestrial diameter, should disappear (or be severely
depleted) while converting into tau flavor: any rarest vertical 12 GeV muon
track at South Pole Deep Core volume, pointing back to North Pole, might be
tracing mostly a noise-free astrophysical signal. The corresponding Deep Core
6-7-8-9 channels trigger maybe point in those directions and inside that energy
range without much background. Deep Core detector at South Pole, may scan at
18-27GeV energy windows, into a narrow vertical cone for a novel neutrino
astronomy almost noise-free, pointing back toward the North Pole.Unfortunately
muon at 12 GeV trace their arrival direction mostly spread around an unique
string in a zenith-cone solid angle. To achieve also an azimuth angular
resolution a two string detection at once is needed. The doubling of the Deep
Core string number, (two new arrays of six string each, achieving an average
detection distance of 36.5 m), is desirable, leading to a larger Deep Core
detection mass (more than double) and a sharper zenith and azimuth angular
resolution by two-string vertical axis detection. Such an improvement may show
a noise free (at least factor ten) muon neutrino astronomy. This enhancement
may also be a crucial probe of a peculiar anisotropy foreseen for atmospheric
anti-muon, in CPT violated physics versus conserved one, following a hint by
recent Minos results.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.0273 [pdf] - 589134
Cen A persistence and Virgo absence versus updated maps to understand
UHECR nature
Submitted: 2010-12-31
Ultra High Cosmic Rays (UHECR) should be tracing their sources, making a new
astronomy. Their events counting are finally growing, by Auger experiment, into
cosmic sky. Their map should follow the mass distribution in a narrow cosmic
volume (the GZK cut off region, correlated with Super Galactic Plane (SPG) or
Local Group) if they were protons, as most expected. Recently the last 69 UHECR
did not longer follow the SGP map, opening the way to very different
correlations, and extreme bending connection; we reconfirm here our Lightest
Nuclei interpretation, while showing here the last event over different radio,
X, Gamma and tens TeV CR maps. The Virgo Cluster absence, the persistence of
UHECR clustering along Cen A, the first triplet along Vela seem to confirm
light nuclei UHECR understanding, implying a very narrow Universe view, even
partially of galactic origin. UHECR fragments might follow (at half, fourth of
the energy) the same UHECR map with a tail or a crown clustering around main
UHECR group. Also secondary gamma and UHE neutrino might trace partially those
maps. Tau neutrinos at EeV or PeVs may play a role in correlating UHECR map and
disentangling nucleon from nuclei nature, possibly in Auger Fluorescence
Telescopes, by night horizontal up-going tau airshowers.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1012.5271 [pdf] - 335954
Deep Core muon neutrino rate and anisotropy by mixing and CPT violation
Submitted: 2010-12-23
Neutrinos are allowed to mix and to oscillate among their flavor. Muon and
tau in particular oscillate at largest values.Last Minos experiment claimed
possible difference among their matter and anti-matter masses, leading to a
first violation of the most believed CPT symmetry.Isotropically born
atmospheric muon neutrino at 20-80 GeV, while up-going, they might be partially
suppressed by mixing in analogy to historical SuperKamiokande muon neutrino
disappearance into tau, leading to large scale anisotropy signals. Here we show
an independent muon rate foreseen in Deep Core based on observed SK signals
extrapolated to DeepCore mass and its surrounding. Our rate prediction
partially differ from previous ones. The neutrino muon disappearance into tau
is leading to an anisotropy in vertical up-going muon track: in particular
along channel 3-5 we expect a huge rate (tens of thousand of events) of neutral
current events, charged current electron and inclined crossing muons. Moreover
at channel 6-9 we expect a severe suppression of the rate due to muon
disappearance (in CPT conserved frame). Such an anisotropy might be partially
tested by more than one string detection at E> 45 GeV energy. A CPT violation
may induce a more remarkable suppression of vertical up-going tracks because of
larger anti-neutrino muon reduction for E> 35 GeV.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:0910.2273 [pdf] - 902033
An apparent GRBs evolution around us or a sampling of thin GRB beaming
jets?
Submitted: 2009-10-12, last modified: 2009-10-14
The gamma ray burst apparent average isotropic power versus their red-shift
of all known GRB (Sept.2009) is reported. It calls for an unrealistic Gamma Ray
Burst Evolution around us or it just probe the need of a very thin gamma
precession-jet model. These precessing and spinning jet are originated by
Inverse Compton and-or Synchrotron Radiation at pulsars or micro-quasars
sources, by ultra-relativistic electrons. These Jets are most powerful at
Supernova birth, blazing, once on axis, to us and flashing GRB detector. The
trembling of the thin jet (spinning, precessing, bent by magnetic fields)
explains naturally the observed erratic multi-explosive structure of different
GRBs and its rare re-brightening. The jets are precessing (by binary companion
or inner disk asymmetry) and decaying by power law on time scales to a few
hours. GRB blazing occurs inside the observer cone of view only a seconds
duration times; because relativistic synchrotron (or IC) laws the jet angle is
thinner in gamma but wider in X band. Its apparent brightening is so well
correlated with its hardness (The Amati correlation). This explain the wider
and longer X GRB afterglow duration and the (not so much) rare presence of
X-ray precursors well before the apparent main GRB explosion. The jet lepton
maybe originated by an inner primary hadron core (as well as pions and muons
secondary Jets). The EGRET, AGILE and Fermi few hardest and late GeV gamma
might be PeV neutron beta decay in flight observed in-axis under a relativistic
shrinkage.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.1517 [pdf] - 24107
Achievements and Mirages in Uhecr and Neutrino Astronomy
Submitted: 2009-05-10
Photon Astronomy ruled the last four centuries while wider photon band ruled
last radio-X-Gamma century of discovery. Present decade may see the rise and
competition of UHECR and UHE Neutrino Astronomy. Tau Neutrino may win and be
the first flavor revealed. It could soon rise at horizons in AUGER at EeV
energies, if nucleons are the main UHECR currier. If on the contrary UHECR are
Lightest nuclei (He, Li. B) UHE tau neutrino maybe suppressed at EeV and
enhanced at tens -hundred PeV. Detectable in AMIGA and HEAT denser sub-array in
AUGER. Within a few years.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:0902.3290 [pdf] - 276846
Lightest Nuclei in UHECR versus Tau Neutrino Astronomy
Submitted: 2009-02-19
UHECR may be either nucleons or nuclei; in the latter case the Lightest
Nuclei, as He, Li, Be, explains at best the absence of Virgo signals and the
crowding of events around Cen-A bent by galactic magnetic fields. This model
fit the observed nuclear mass composition discovered in AUGER. However UHECR
nucleons above GZK produce EeV neutrinos while Heavy Nuclei, as Fe UHECR do not
produce much. UHECR He nuclei at few tens EeV suffer nuclear fragmentation
(producing low energetic neutrino at tens PeVs) but it suffer anyway photo-pion
GZK suppression (leading to EeV neutrinos) once above one-few 10^{20} eV. Both
these cosmogenic UHE secondary neutrinos signals may influence usual predicted
GZK Tau Neutrino Astronomy in significant and detectable way; the role of
resonant antineutrino electron-electron leading to Tau air-shower may also
rise.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:0902.3293 [pdf] - 21545
Beaming Selection and SN-GRB-Jets Evolution
Submitted: 2009-02-18
After a decade of Fireball reign there is a hope for thin collimated Jet to
solve the Supernova-GRB mystery
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:0901.4524 [pdf] - 20787
The XRF080109-SN2008D and a decade of GRB-Jet-SN connection
Submitted: 2009-01-28
Last and nearest GRB-XRF 080109 has been an exceptional lesson on GRB nature.
After a decade (since 25 April 08) we know that Supernovae may often contain a
Jet. Its persistent activity may shine on axis as a GRBs. Such a persistent,
thin beamed gamma jet may be powered by either a BH (Black Holes) or Pulsars.
Late stages of these jets may loose the SN traces and appear as a short GRB or
a long orphan GRB (depending on jet angular velocity and view angle). XRF are
peripherical viewing of the jets. These precessing and spinning gamma jet are
originated by Inverse Compton and-or Synchrotron Radiation at pulsars or
micro-quasars sources, by ultra-relativistic electrons. These Jets are most
powerful at Supernova birth, blazing, once on axis, to us and flashing GRB
detector. The trembling of the thin jet explains naturally the observed erratic
multi-explosive structure of different GRBs. The jets are precessing (by binary
companion or inner disk asymmetry) and decaying by power on time scales of few
hours, but they keep staying inside the observer cone view only a few seconds
duration times (GRB); the jet is thinner in gamma and wider in X band. This
explain the wider and longer X GRB afterglow duration and the rare presence of
X-ray precursors.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.1548 [pdf] - 7961
Science with the new generation high energy gamma- ray experiments
Alvarez, M.;
D'Armiento, D.;
Agnetta, G.;
Alberdi, A.;
Antonelli, A.;
Argan, A.;
Assis, P.;
Baltz, E. A.;
Bambi, C.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bartko, H.;
Basset, M.;
Bastieri, D.;
Belli, P.;
Benford, G.;
Bergstrom, L.;
Bernabei, R.;
Bertone, G.;
Biland, A.;
Biondo, B.;
Bocchino, F.;
Branchini, E.;
Brigida, M.;
Bringmann, T.;
Brogueira, P.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Caballero, J. A.;
Caliandro, G. A.;
Camarri, P.;
Cappella, F.;
Caraveo, P.;
Carbone, R.;
Carvajal, M.;
Casanova, S.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Catalano, O.;
Catena, R.;
Celi, F.;
Celotti, A.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chen, A.;
Clay, R.;
Cocco, V.;
Conrad, J.;
Costa, E.;
Cuoco, A.;
Cusumano, G.;
Dai, C. J.;
Dawson, B.;
De Lotto, B.;
De Paris, G.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Del Monte, E.;
Delgado, C.;
Di Ciaccio, A.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Di Falco, S.;
Di Persio, G.;
Dingus, B. L.;
Dominguez, A.;
Donato, F.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Doro, M.;
Edsjo, J.;
Navas, J. M. Espino;
Santo, M. C. Espirito;
Evangelista, Y.;
Evoli, C.;
Fargion, D.;
Favuzzi, C.;
Feroci, M.;
Fiorini, M.;
Foggetta, L.;
Fornengo, N.;
Froysland, T.;
Frutti, M.;
Fuschino, F.;
Gomez, J. L.;
Gomez, M.;
Gaggero, D.;
Galante, N.;
Gallardo, M. I.;
Galli, M.;
Garcia, J. E.;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gargano, F.;
Gaug, M.;
Gianotti, F.;
Giarrusso, S.;
Giebels, B.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giommi, P.;
Giordano, F.;
Giuliani, A.;
Glicenstein, J.;
Goncalves, P.;
Grasso, D.;
Guerriero, M.;
He, H. L.;
Incicchitti, A.;
Kirk, J.;
Kuang, H. H.;
La Barbera, A.;
La Rosa, G.;
Labanti, C.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Liberati, S.;
Liello, F.;
Lipari, P.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lozano, M.;
De Sanctis, P. G. Lucentini;
Ma, J. M.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Maccione, L.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Mangano, A.;
Mariotti, M.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Martel, I.;
Masiero, A.;
Massaro, E.;
Mastropietro, M.;
Mattaini, E.;
Mauri, F.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Mineo, T.;
Mizobuchi, S.;
Moiseev, A.;
Moles, M.;
Monte, C.;
Montecchia, F.;
Morelli, E.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I.;
Nozzoli, F.;
Ormes, J. F.;
Peres-Torres, M. A.;
Pacciani, L.;
Pellizzoni, A.;
Perez-Bernal, F.;
Perotti, F.;
Picozza, P.;
Pieri, L.;
Pietroni, M.;
Pimenta, M.;
Pina, A.;
Pittori, C.;
Pontoni, C.;
Porrovecchio, G.;
Prada, F.;
Prest, M.;
Prosperi, D.;
Protheroe, R.;
Pucella, G.;
Quesada, J. M.;
Quintana, J. M.;
Quintero, J. R.;
Raino, S.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Rissi, M.;
Rodriguez, J.;
Rossi, E.;
Rowell, G.;
Rubini, A.;
Russo, F.;
Sanchez-Conde, M.;
Sacco, B.;
Scapin, V.;
Schelke, M.;
Segreto, A.;
Sellerholm, A.;
Sheng, X. D.;
Smith, A.;
Soffitta, P.;
Sparvoli, R.;
Spinelli, P.;
Stamatescu, V.;
Stark, L. S.;
Tavani, M.;
Thornton, G.;
Titarchuk, L. G.;
Tome, B.;
Traci, A.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Trois, A.;
Vallania, P.;
Vallazza, E.;
Vercellone, S.;
Vernetto, S.;
Vitale, V.;
Wild, N.;
Ye, Z. P.;
Zambra, A.;
Zandanel, F.;
Zanello, D.
Submitted: 2007-12-04
This Conference is the fifth of a series of Workshops on High Energy Gamma-
ray Experiments, following the Conferences held in Perugia 2003, Bari 2004,
Cividale del Friuli 2005, Elba Island 2006. This year the focus was on the use
of gamma-ray to study the Dark Matter component of the Universe, the origin and
propagation of Cosmic Rays, Extra Large Spatial Dimensions and Tests of Lorentz
Invariance.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:0708.3645 [pdf] - 4298
Why Tau First?
Submitted: 2007-08-27
Electron neutrino has been the first neutral lepton to be foreseen and
discovered last century. The un-ordered muon and its neutrino arose later by
cosmic rays. The tau discover, the heaviest, the most unstable charged lepton,
was found surprisingly on 1975. Its neutrino was hardly revealed just on 2000.
So why High Energy Neutrino Astronomy should rise first via tau neutrino, the
last, the most rare one? The reasons are based on a chain of three favorable
coincidences found last decade: the neutrino masses and their flavor mixing,
the UHECR opacity on Cosmic Black Body (GZK cut off on BBR), the amplified tau
air-shower decaying in flight. Indeed guaranteed UHE GZK tau neutrinos, feed by
muon mixing, while skimming the Earth might lead to boosted UHE tau, mostly
horizontal ones. These UHE lepton decay in flight are spread, amplified, noise
free Air-Shower: a huge event for an unique particle. To be observed soon:
within Auger sky, in present decade. Its discover may sign of the first tau
appearance.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612745 [pdf] - 88083
Splitting neutrino masses and showering into Sky
Submitted: 2006-12-27, last modified: 2007-07-10
Neutrino masses might be as light as a few time the atmospheric neutrino mass
splitting. High Energy ZeV cosmic neutrinos (in Z-Showering model) might hit
relic ones at each mass in different resonance energies in our nearby Universe.
This non-degenerated density and energy must split UHE Z-boson secondaries (in
Z-Burst model) leading to multi injection of UHECR nucleons within future
extreme AUGER energy. Secondaries of Z-Burst as neutral gamma, below a few tens
EeV are better surviving local GZK cut-off and they might explain recent Hires
BL-Lac UHECR correlations at small angles. A different high energy resonance
must lead to Glashow's anti-neutrino showers while hitting electrons in matter.
In air, Glashow's anti-neutrino showers lead to collimated and directional
air-showers offering a new Neutrino Astronomy. At greater energy around PeV,
Tau escaping mountains and Earth and decaying in flight are effectively
showering in air sky. These Horizontal showering is splitting by geomagnetic
field in forked shapes. Such air-showers secondaries release amplified and
beamed gamma bursts (like observed TGF), made also by muon and electron pair
bundles, with their accompanying rich Cherenkov flashes. Also planet' s largest
(Saturn, Jupiter) atmosphere limbs offer an ideal screen for UHE GZK and
Z-burst tau neutrino, because their largest sizes. Titan thick atmosphere and
small radius are optimal for discovering up-going resonant Glashow resonant
showers. Earth detection of Neutrino showering by twin Magic Telescopes on top
mountains, or by balloons and satellites arrays facing the limbs are the
simplest and cheapest way toward UHE Neutrino Astronomy .