sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

D'Armiento, D.

Normalized to: D'Armiento, D.

15 article(s) in total. 210 co-authors, from 1 to 15 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1208.2471  [pdf] - 913043
UHECR bending, clustering and decaying feeding gamma anisotropy
Comments: 4 pages,5 figures
Submitted: 2012-08-12
Ultra High Cosmic Rays) made by He-like lightest nuclei might fit clustering along Cen A. Moreover He like UHECR nuclei explain Virgo absence because the light nuclei fragility and opacity above a few Mpc. We foresaw (2009) that UHECR He from Cen-A AGN being fragile should partially fragment into secondaries at tens EeV multiplet (D,He^{3},p) as the recent twin multiplet discovered ones (AUGER-ICRC-2011), at 20 EeV along Cen A UHECR clustering. We suggest that UHECR are also heavy radioactive galactic nuclei as Ni^{56}, Ni^{57} and Co^{57} widely bent (tens degree up to 100 degrees) by galactic fields. UHECR radioactivity and decay in flight at hundreds keV is boosted (by huge Lorentz factor (billion) leading to PeVs electrons and consequent synchrotron TeVs gamma offering UHECR-TeV correlated sky anisotropy. Electron and tau neutrinos secondaries at PeVs maybe the first signature of such expected radioactive secondary tail.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1012.3245  [pdf] - 565625
Beaming neutrino and antineutrinos across the Earth to disentangle neutrino mixing parameters
Comments: 18 pages, 23 figures; 8 Figures had minor changes: Double Fig4-5, Fig 6-7-8-9; 3 Figures are New: Final accepted version in Ap J (2012) with an addendum of a Cabibbo photo-art composition
Submitted: 2010-12-15, last modified: 2012-08-08
A MINOS result seemed to hint a different anti-neutrino mass splitting and mixing angle with respect to the neutrino ones, offering a hint for a CPT violation in lepton sector. However more recent MINOS data reduced the neutrino-antineutrino differences leading to a narrow discrepancy almost compatible with no CPT violation, hard to be disentangled. Moreover last a few years of OPERA activity on tau appearance is still un-probed (one unique event). Both flavor muon-tau mixing, tau appearance and eventual CPT violation disentanglement need more tools to be enhanced. Atmospheric muon neutrino spectra and anisotropy in Deep Core at ten-tens GeV (yet unpublished) may test the muon-tau conversion but they can hardly reveal such last tiny MINOS CPT asymmetry. We show how the longest baseline neutrino oscillation available, crossing most of the Earth diameter, within an OPERA-like experiment from CERN (or FERMILAB) to ICECUBE-Deep Core neutrino detector at 21 GeV energy, may at best disentangle even last tiny CPT violation (within 6 sigma a year) while testing at highest rate tau-antitau appearance. We propose the muon neutrino disappearance or (for any CPT violation) the partial anti-muon appearance at the longest distances. Such a tuned detection experiment may lead to a clear and strong signature of tau or anti-tau generation (even within its neutral current noise background events): nearly one antitau or two tau a day. The tau appearance signal is above (or within) 10 sigma a year, even for 1% OPERA-like experiment. Peculiar configurations for theta_13 angle test and hierarchy neutrino mass test may also be addressed by a Deep Core-PINGU array detector observing electron neutrino shower at 6 GeV neutrino energy windows.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1109.5368  [pdf] - 524850
Inconsistence of super-luminal Cern-Opera neutrino speed with observed SN1987A burst and neutrino mixing for any imaginary neutrino mass
Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures, corrected and updated atmospheric neutrino simulation
Submitted: 2011-09-25, last modified: 2012-03-05
We tried to fit in any way the recent Opera-Cern claims of a neutrino super-luminal speed with observed Supernova SN1987A neutrino burst and all (or most) neutrino flavor oscillation. We considered three main frame-works: (1) A tachyon imaginary neutrino mass, whose timing is nevertheless in conflict with observed IMB-Kamiokande SN1987A burst by thousands of billion times longer. (2) An ad hoc anti-tachyon model whose timing shrinkage may accommodate SN1987A burst but greatly disagree with energy independent Cern-Opera super-luminal speed. (3) A split neutrino flavor speed (among a common real mass relativistic neutrino electron component and a super-luminal neutrino {\mu}) in an ad hoc frozen speed scenario that is leading to the prompt neutrino de-coherence and the rapid flavor mixing (between electron and muon ones) that are in conflict with most oscillation records. Therefore we concluded that an error must be hidden in Opera-Cern time calibration (as indeed recent rumors seem to confirm). We are also reminding the relevance of the guaranteed minimal atmospheric neutrino mass whose detection may be achieved by a milliseconds graviton-neutrino split time delay among gravity burst and neutronization neutrino peak in any future SN explosion in Andromeda recordable in Megaton neutrino detector.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1103.2642  [pdf] - 966469
Foreseeing Neutrino spectra in Deep Core
Comments: 8 pages, 8 figures
Submitted: 2011-03-14
Atmospheric muon neutrino in Deep Core (whose rate and spectra might be soon available) should exhibit a suppression (due to tens GeV up-going muon neutrino converted into tau flavor) that must be imprinted in out-coming rate spectra. We estimate here our independent muon neutrino spectra based on SK and its projected record on Deep Core Channels. Our estimate (based on cosmic rays, muon records and tested Super-Kamiokande (SK) data) differs both in shape and in rate from other previous published spectra. The expected rate might exhibit a minimum near channel 6 of Deep Core strings and it should manifest strong signature for flavor mixing (mostly between channel 4--15)and a relevant anomaly for eventual CPT violation (MINOS like) written at channel 3--6,whose statistical weight (mainly at channel 5) might soon confirm or dismiss MINOS CPT claim. At the flux minimum around channel 6, (a flux suppressed respect the non oscillated case at least by an order of magnitude) the atmospheric neutrino paucity offers a better windows to a twenty GeV Neutrino Astronomy. Therefore by doubling the string array we may foresee a richer rate and a more complete (zenith and azimuth) atmospheric neutrino distribution and an exciting first twenty GeV Astronomy.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1101.1991  [pdf] - 1051311
A 20 GeVs transparent neutrino astronomy from the North Pole?
Comments: 6 pages, 11 figures
Submitted: 2011-01-10
Muon neutrino astronomy is drown within a polluted atmospheric neutrino noise. However at 24 GeV energy atmospheric muon neutrinos, while rising vertically along the terrestrial diameter, should disappear (or be severely depleted) while converting into tau flavor: any rarest vertical 12 GeV muon track at South Pole Deep Core volume, pointing back to North Pole, might be tracing mostly a noise-free astrophysical signal. The corresponding Deep Core 6-7-8-9 channels trigger maybe point in those directions and inside that energy range without much background. Deep Core detector at South Pole, may scan at 18-27GeV energy windows, into a narrow vertical cone for a novel neutrino astronomy almost noise-free, pointing back toward the North Pole.Unfortunately muon at 12 GeV trace their arrival direction mostly spread around an unique string in a zenith-cone solid angle. To achieve also an azimuth angular resolution a two string detection at once is needed. The doubling of the Deep Core string number, (two new arrays of six string each, achieving an average detection distance of 36.5 m), is desirable, leading to a larger Deep Core detection mass (more than double) and a sharper zenith and azimuth angular resolution by two-string vertical axis detection. Such an improvement may show a noise free (at least factor ten) muon neutrino astronomy. This enhancement may also be a crucial probe of a peculiar anisotropy foreseen for atmospheric anti-muon, in CPT violated physics versus conserved one, following a hint by recent Minos results.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1101.0273  [pdf] - 589134
Cen A persistence and Virgo absence versus updated maps to understand UHECR nature
Comments: 16 pages,8 figures; 2011, Italian Physical Society, Vol. 103 Vulcano Workshop- Frontier Objects in Astrophysics and Particle Physics; F. Giovannelli and G. Mannocchi,
Submitted: 2010-12-31
Ultra High Cosmic Rays (UHECR) should be tracing their sources, making a new astronomy. Their events counting are finally growing, by Auger experiment, into cosmic sky. Their map should follow the mass distribution in a narrow cosmic volume (the GZK cut off region, correlated with Super Galactic Plane (SPG) or Local Group) if they were protons, as most expected. Recently the last 69 UHECR did not longer follow the SGP map, opening the way to very different correlations, and extreme bending connection; we reconfirm here our Lightest Nuclei interpretation, while showing here the last event over different radio, X, Gamma and tens TeV CR maps. The Virgo Cluster absence, the persistence of UHECR clustering along Cen A, the first triplet along Vela seem to confirm light nuclei UHECR understanding, implying a very narrow Universe view, even partially of galactic origin. UHECR fragments might follow (at half, fourth of the energy) the same UHECR map with a tail or a crown clustering around main UHECR group. Also secondary gamma and UHE neutrino might trace partially those maps. Tau neutrinos at EeV or PeVs may play a role in correlating UHECR map and disentangling nucleon from nuclei nature, possibly in Auger Fluorescence Telescopes, by night horizontal up-going tau airshowers.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:1012.5271  [pdf] - 335954
Deep Core muon neutrino rate and anisotropy by mixing and CPT violation
Comments: 6 pages, 14 figures
Submitted: 2010-12-23
Neutrinos are allowed to mix and to oscillate among their flavor. Muon and tau in particular oscillate at largest values.Last Minos experiment claimed possible difference among their matter and anti-matter masses, leading to a first violation of the most believed CPT symmetry.Isotropically born atmospheric muon neutrino at 20-80 GeV, while up-going, they might be partially suppressed by mixing in analogy to historical SuperKamiokande muon neutrino disappearance into tau, leading to large scale anisotropy signals. Here we show an independent muon rate foreseen in Deep Core based on observed SK signals extrapolated to DeepCore mass and its surrounding. Our rate prediction partially differ from previous ones. The neutrino muon disappearance into tau is leading to an anisotropy in vertical up-going muon track: in particular along channel 3-5 we expect a huge rate (tens of thousand of events) of neutral current events, charged current electron and inclined crossing muons. Moreover at channel 6-9 we expect a severe suppression of the rate due to muon disappearance (in CPT conserved frame). Such an anisotropy might be partially tested by more than one string detection at E> 45 GeV energy. A CPT violation may induce a more remarkable suppression of vertical up-going tracks because of larger anti-neutrino muon reduction for E> 35 GeV.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:0910.2273  [pdf] - 902033
An apparent GRBs evolution around us or a sampling of thin GRB beaming jets?
Comments: 13 pages, 11 figures, Vulcano 2009
Submitted: 2009-10-12, last modified: 2009-10-14
The gamma ray burst apparent average isotropic power versus their red-shift of all known GRB (Sept.2009) is reported. It calls for an unrealistic Gamma Ray Burst Evolution around us or it just probe the need of a very thin gamma precession-jet model. These precessing and spinning jet are originated by Inverse Compton and-or Synchrotron Radiation at pulsars or micro-quasars sources, by ultra-relativistic electrons. These Jets are most powerful at Supernova birth, blazing, once on axis, to us and flashing GRB detector. The trembling of the thin jet (spinning, precessing, bent by magnetic fields) explains naturally the observed erratic multi-explosive structure of different GRBs and its rare re-brightening. The jets are precessing (by binary companion or inner disk asymmetry) and decaying by power law on time scales to a few hours. GRB blazing occurs inside the observer cone of view only a seconds duration times; because relativistic synchrotron (or IC) laws the jet angle is thinner in gamma but wider in X band. Its apparent brightening is so well correlated with its hardness (The Amati correlation). This explain the wider and longer X GRB afterglow duration and the (not so much) rare presence of X-ray precursors well before the apparent main GRB explosion. The jet lepton maybe originated by an inner primary hadron core (as well as pions and muons secondary Jets). The EGRET, AGILE and Fermi few hardest and late GeV gamma might be PeV neutron beta decay in flight observed in-axis under a relativistic shrinkage.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:0905.1517  [pdf] - 24107
Achievements and Mirages in Uhecr and Neutrino Astronomy
Comments: 15 pages, 11 figures, Venice Neutrino Telescope March 2009
Submitted: 2009-05-10
Photon Astronomy ruled the last four centuries while wider photon band ruled last radio-X-Gamma century of discovery. Present decade may see the rise and competition of UHECR and UHE Neutrino Astronomy. Tau Neutrino may win and be the first flavor revealed. It could soon rise at horizons in AUGER at EeV energies, if nucleons are the main UHECR currier. If on the contrary UHECR are Lightest nuclei (He, Li. B) UHE tau neutrino maybe suppressed at EeV and enhanced at tens -hundred PeV. Detectable in AMIGA and HEAT denser sub-array in AUGER. Within a few years.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:0902.3290  [pdf] - 276846
Lightest Nuclei in UHECR versus Tau Neutrino Astronomy
Comments: 5 pages, 5 figures, CRIS 2008
Submitted: 2009-02-19
UHECR may be either nucleons or nuclei; in the latter case the Lightest Nuclei, as He, Li, Be, explains at best the absence of Virgo signals and the crowding of events around Cen-A bent by galactic magnetic fields. This model fit the observed nuclear mass composition discovered in AUGER. However UHECR nucleons above GZK produce EeV neutrinos while Heavy Nuclei, as Fe UHECR do not produce much. UHECR He nuclei at few tens EeV suffer nuclear fragmentation (producing low energetic neutrino at tens PeVs) but it suffer anyway photo-pion GZK suppression (leading to EeV neutrinos) once above one-few 10^{20} eV. Both these cosmogenic UHE secondary neutrinos signals may influence usual predicted GZK Tau Neutrino Astronomy in significant and detectable way; the role of resonant antineutrino electron-electron leading to Tau air-shower may also rise.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:0902.3293  [pdf] - 21545
Beaming Selection and SN-GRB-Jets Evolution
Comments: 8 pages, 10 figures; white pages 2009
Submitted: 2009-02-18
After a decade of Fireball reign there is a hope for thin collimated Jet to solve the Supernova-GRB mystery
[12]  oai:arXiv.org:0901.4524  [pdf] - 20787
The XRF080109-SN2008D and a decade of GRB-Jet-SN connection
Comments: 11 pages, 12 figures
Submitted: 2009-01-28
Last and nearest GRB-XRF 080109 has been an exceptional lesson on GRB nature. After a decade (since 25 April 08) we know that Supernovae may often contain a Jet. Its persistent activity may shine on axis as a GRBs. Such a persistent, thin beamed gamma jet may be powered by either a BH (Black Holes) or Pulsars. Late stages of these jets may loose the SN traces and appear as a short GRB or a long orphan GRB (depending on jet angular velocity and view angle). XRF are peripherical viewing of the jets. These precessing and spinning gamma jet are originated by Inverse Compton and-or Synchrotron Radiation at pulsars or micro-quasars sources, by ultra-relativistic electrons. These Jets are most powerful at Supernova birth, blazing, once on axis, to us and flashing GRB detector. The trembling of the thin jet explains naturally the observed erratic multi-explosive structure of different GRBs. The jets are precessing (by binary companion or inner disk asymmetry) and decaying by power on time scales of few hours, but they keep staying inside the observer cone view only a few seconds duration times (GRB); the jet is thinner in gamma and wider in X band. This explain the wider and longer X GRB afterglow duration and the rare presence of X-ray precursors.
[13]  oai:arXiv.org:0712.1548  [pdf] - 7961
Science with the new generation high energy gamma- ray experiments
Alvarez, M.; D'Armiento, D.; Agnetta, G.; Alberdi, A.; Antonelli, A.; Argan, A.; Assis, P.; Baltz, E. A.; Bambi, C.; Barbiellini, G.; Bartko, H.; Basset, M.; Bastieri, D.; Belli, P.; Benford, G.; Bergstrom, L.; Bernabei, R.; Bertone, G.; Biland, A.; Biondo, B.; Bocchino, F.; Branchini, E.; Brigida, M.; Bringmann, T.; Brogueira, P.; Bulgarelli, A.; Caballero, J. A.; Caliandro, G. A.; Camarri, P.; Cappella, F.; Caraveo, P.; Carbone, R.; Carvajal, M.; Casanova, S.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Catalano, O.; Catena, R.; Celi, F.; Celotti, A.; Cerulli, R.; Chen, A.; Clay, R.; Cocco, V.; Conrad, J.; Costa, E.; Cuoco, A.; Cusumano, G.; Dai, C. J.; Dawson, B.; De Lotto, B.; De Paris, G.; Postigo, A. de Ugarte; Del Monte, E.; Delgado, C.; Di Ciaccio, A.; Di Cocco, G.; Di Falco, S.; Di Persio, G.; Dingus, B. L.; Dominguez, A.; Donato, F.; Donnarumma, I.; Doro, M.; Edsjo, J.; Navas, J. M. Espino; Santo, M. C. Espirito; Evangelista, Y.; Evoli, C.; Fargion, D.; Favuzzi, C.; Feroci, M.; Fiorini, M.; Foggetta, L.; Fornengo, N.; Froysland, T.; Frutti, M.; Fuschino, F.; Gomez, J. L.; Gomez, M.; Gaggero, D.; Galante, N.; Gallardo, M. I.; Galli, M.; Garcia, J. E.; Garczarczyk, M.; Gargano, F.; Gaug, M.; Gianotti, F.; Giarrusso, S.; Giebels, B.; Giglietto, N.; Giommi, P.; Giordano, F.; Giuliani, A.; Glicenstein, J.; Goncalves, P.; Grasso, D.; Guerriero, M.; He, H. L.; Incicchitti, A.; Kirk, J.; Kuang, H. H.; La Barbera, A.; La Rosa, G.; Labanti, C.; Lamanna, G.; Lapshov, I.; Lazzarotto, F.; Liberati, S.; Liello, F.; Lipari, P.; Longo, F.; Loparco, F.; Lozano, M.; De Sanctis, P. G. Lucentini; Ma, J. M.; Maccarone, M. C.; Maccione, L.; Malvezzi, V.; Mangano, A.; Mariotti, M.; Marisaldi, M.; Martel, I.; Masiero, A.; Massaro, E.; Mastropietro, M.; Mattaini, E.; Mauri, F.; Mazziotta, M. N.; Mereghetti, S.; Mineo, T.; Mizobuchi, S.; Moiseev, A.; Moles, M.; Monte, C.; Montecchia, F.; Morelli, E.; Morselli, A.; Moskalenko, I.; Nozzoli, F.; Ormes, J. F.; Peres-Torres, M. A.; Pacciani, L.; Pellizzoni, A.; Perez-Bernal, F.; Perotti, F.; Picozza, P.; Pieri, L.; Pietroni, M.; Pimenta, M.; Pina, A.; Pittori, C.; Pontoni, C.; Porrovecchio, G.; Prada, F.; Prest, M.; Prosperi, D.; Protheroe, R.; Pucella, G.; Quesada, J. M.; Quintana, J. M.; Quintero, J. R.; Raino, S.; Rapisarda, M.; Rissi, M.; Rodriguez, J.; Rossi, E.; Rowell, G.; Rubini, A.; Russo, F.; Sanchez-Conde, M.; Sacco, B.; Scapin, V.; Schelke, M.; Segreto, A.; Sellerholm, A.; Sheng, X. D.; Smith, A.; Soffitta, P.; Sparvoli, R.; Spinelli, P.; Stamatescu, V.; Stark, L. S.; Tavani, M.; Thornton, G.; Titarchuk, L. G.; Tome, B.; Traci, A.; Trifoglio, M.; Trois, A.; Vallania, P.; Vallazza, E.; Vercellone, S.; Vernetto, S.; Vitale, V.; Wild, N.; Ye, Z. P.; Zambra, A.; Zandanel, F.; Zanello, D.
Comments: 328 pages, 7.8Mb, Proceedings of the 5th SCINEGHE Workshop, June 18-20, 2007 http://www.roma2.infn.it/SciNeGHE07/
Submitted: 2007-12-04
This Conference is the fifth of a series of Workshops on High Energy Gamma- ray Experiments, following the Conferences held in Perugia 2003, Bari 2004, Cividale del Friuli 2005, Elba Island 2006. This year the focus was on the use of gamma-ray to study the Dark Matter component of the Universe, the origin and propagation of Cosmic Rays, Extra Large Spatial Dimensions and Tests of Lorentz Invariance.
[14]  oai:arXiv.org:0708.3645  [pdf] - 4298
Why Tau First?
Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2007-08-27
Electron neutrino has been the first neutral lepton to be foreseen and discovered last century. The un-ordered muon and its neutrino arose later by cosmic rays. The tau discover, the heaviest, the most unstable charged lepton, was found surprisingly on 1975. Its neutrino was hardly revealed just on 2000. So why High Energy Neutrino Astronomy should rise first via tau neutrino, the last, the most rare one? The reasons are based on a chain of three favorable coincidences found last decade: the neutrino masses and their flavor mixing, the UHECR opacity on Cosmic Black Body (GZK cut off on BBR), the amplified tau air-shower decaying in flight. Indeed guaranteed UHE GZK tau neutrinos, feed by muon mixing, while skimming the Earth might lead to boosted UHE tau, mostly horizontal ones. These UHE lepton decay in flight are spread, amplified, noise free Air-Shower: a huge event for an unique particle. To be observed soon: within Auger sky, in present decade. Its discover may sign of the first tau appearance.
[15]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612745  [pdf] - 88083
Splitting neutrino masses and showering into Sky
Comments: 4 pages, 7 figures; an author's name correction and Journal Reference
Submitted: 2006-12-27, last modified: 2007-07-10
Neutrino masses might be as light as a few time the atmospheric neutrino mass splitting. High Energy ZeV cosmic neutrinos (in Z-Showering model) might hit relic ones at each mass in different resonance energies in our nearby Universe. This non-degenerated density and energy must split UHE Z-boson secondaries (in Z-Burst model) leading to multi injection of UHECR nucleons within future extreme AUGER energy. Secondaries of Z-Burst as neutral gamma, below a few tens EeV are better surviving local GZK cut-off and they might explain recent Hires BL-Lac UHECR correlations at small angles. A different high energy resonance must lead to Glashow's anti-neutrino showers while hitting electrons in matter. In air, Glashow's anti-neutrino showers lead to collimated and directional air-showers offering a new Neutrino Astronomy. At greater energy around PeV, Tau escaping mountains and Earth and decaying in flight are effectively showering in air sky. These Horizontal showering is splitting by geomagnetic field in forked shapes. Such air-showers secondaries release amplified and beamed gamma bursts (like observed TGF), made also by muon and electron pair bundles, with their accompanying rich Cherenkov flashes. Also planet' s largest (Saturn, Jupiter) atmosphere limbs offer an ideal screen for UHE GZK and Z-burst tau neutrino, because their largest sizes. Titan thick atmosphere and small radius are optimal for discovering up-going resonant Glashow resonant showers. Earth detection of Neutrino showering by twin Magic Telescopes on top mountains, or by balloons and satellites arrays facing the limbs are the simplest and cheapest way toward UHE Neutrino Astronomy .