Czekal, I.
Normalized to: Czekal, I.
1 article(s) in total. 48 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 19,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.3824 [pdf] - 1179938
Systematic Uncertainties Associated with the Cosmological Analysis of
the First Pan-STARRS1 Type Ia Supernova Sample
Scolnic, D.;
Rest, A.;
Riess, A.;
Huber, M. E.;
Foley, R. J.;
Brout, D.;
Chornock, R.;
Narayan, G.;
Tonry, J. L.;
Berger, E.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Rodney, S.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Schlafly, E.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Challis, P.;
Czekal, I.;
Drout, M.;
Hudson, M. J.;
Kotak, R.;
Leibler, C.;
Lunnan, R.;
Marion, G. H.;
McCrum, M.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Pastorello, A.;
Sanders, N. E.;
Smith, K.;
Stafford, E.;
Thilker, D.;
Valenti, S.;
Wood-Vasey, W. M.;
Zheng, Z.;
Burgett, W. S.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Denneau, L.;
Draper, P. W.;
Flewelling, H.;
Hodapp, K. W.;
Kaiser, N.;
Kudritzki, R. P.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Metcalfe, N.;
Price, P. A.;
Sweeney, W.;
Wainscoat, R.;
Waters, C.
Submitted: 2013-10-14, last modified: 2014-09-02
We probe the systematic uncertainties from 113 Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) in
the Pan-STARRS1 (PS1) sample along with 197 SN Ia from a combination of
low-redshift surveys. The companion paper by Rest et al. (2013) describes the
photometric measurements and cosmological inferences from the PS1 sample. The
largest systematic uncertainty stems from the photometric calibration of the
PS1 and low-z samples. We increase the sample of observed Calspec standards
from 7 to 10 used to define the PS1 calibration system. The PS1 and SDSS-II
calibration systems are compared and discrepancies up to ~0.02 mag are
recovered. We find uncertainties in the proper way to treat intrinsic colors
and reddening produce differences in the recovered value of w up to 3%. We
estimate masses of host galaxies of PS1 supernovae and detect an insignificant
difference in distance residuals of the full sample of 0.037\pm0.031 mag for
host galaxies with high and low masses. Assuming flatness in our analysis of
only SNe measurements, we find $w = {-1.120^{+0.360}_{-0.206}\textrm{(Stat)}
^{+0.269}_{-0.291}\textrm{(Sys)}}$. With additional constraints from BAO,
CMB(Planck) and H0 measurements, we find $w = -1.166^{+0.072}_{-0.069}$ and
$\Omega_M=0.280^{+0.013}_{-0.012}$ (statistical and systematic errors added in
quadrature). Significance of the inconsistency with $w=-1$ depends on whether
we use Planck or WMAP measurements of the CMB:
$w_{\textrm{BAO+H0+SN+WMAP}}=-1.124^{+0.083}_{-0.065}$.