Normalized to: Cupák, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.01069 [pdf] - 2113311
A Global Fireball Observatory
Devillepoix, H. A. R.;
Cupák, M.;
Bland, P. A.;
Sansom, E. K.;
Towner, M. C.;
Howie, R. M.;
Hartig, B. A. D.;
Jansen-Sturgeon, T.;
Shober, P. M.;
Anderson, S. L.;
Benedix, G. K.;
Busan, D.;
Sayers, R.;
Jenniskens, P.;
Albers, J.;
Herd, C. D. K.;
Hill, P. J. A.;
Brown, P. G.;
Krzeminski, Z.;
Osinski, G. R.;
Aoudjehane, H. Chennaoui;
Benkhaldoun, Z.;
Jabiri, A.;
Guennoun, M.;
Barka, A.;
Darhmaoui, H.;
Daly, L.;
Collins, G. S.;
McMullan, S.;
Suttle, M. D.;
Ireland, T.;
Bonning, G.;
Baeza, L.;
Alrefay, T. Y.;
Horner, J.;
Swindle, T. D.;
Hergenrother, C. W.;
Fries, M. D.;
Tomkins, A.;
Langendam, A.;
Rushmer, T.;
O'Neill, C.;
Janches, D.;
Hormaechea, J. L.;
Shaw, C.;
Young, J. S.;
Alexander, M.;
Mardon, A. D.;
Tate, J. R.
Submitted: 2020-04-02, last modified: 2020-06-12
The world's meteorite collections contain a very rich picture of what the
early Solar System would have been made of, however the lack of spatial context
with respect to their parent population for these samples is an issue. The
asteroid population is equally as rich in surface mineralogies, and mapping
these two populations (meteorites and asteroids) together is a major challenge
for planetary science. Directly probing asteroids achieves this at a high cost.
Observing meteorite falls and calculating their pre-atmospheric orbit on the
other hand, is a cheaper way to approach the problem. The Global Fireball
Observatory (GFO) collaboration was established in 2017 and brings together
multiple institutions (from Australia, USA, Canada, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, the
UK, and Argentina) to maximise the area for fireball observation time and
therefore meteorite recoveries. The members have a choice to operate
independently, but they can also choose to work in a fully collaborative manner
with other GFO partners. This efficient approach leverages the experience
gained from the Desert Fireball Network (DFN) pathfinder project in Australia.
The state-of-the art technology (DFN camera systems and data reduction) and
experience of the support teams is shared between all partners, freeing up time
for science investigations and meteorite searching. With all networks combined
together, the GFO collaboration already covers 0.6% of the Earth's surface for
meteorite recovery as of mid-2019, and aims to reach 2% in the early 2020s. We
estimate that after 5 years of operation, the GFO will have observed a fireball
from virtually every meteorite type. This combined effort will bring new,
fresh, extra-terrestrial material to the labs, yielding new insights about the
formation of the Solar System.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.01895 [pdf] - 2076760
Where Did They Come From, Where Did They Go. Grazing Fireballs
Submitted: 2019-12-04, last modified: 2020-03-30
For centuries extremely-long grazing fireball displays have fascinated
observers and inspired people to ponder about their origins. The Desert
Fireball Network (DFN) is the largest single fireball network in the world,
covering about one third of Australian skies. This expansive size has enabled
us to capture a majority of the atmospheric trajectory of a spectacular grazing
event that lasted over90 seconds, penetrated as deep as ~58.5km, and traveled
over 1,300 km through the atmosphere before exiting back into interplanetary
space. Based on our triangulation and dynamic analyses of the event, we have
estimated the initial mass to be at least 60 kg, which would correspond to a30
cm object given a chondritic density (3500 kg m-3). However, this initial mass
estimate is likely a lower bound, considering the minimal deceleration observed
in the luminous phase. The most intriguing quality of this close encounter is
that the meteoroid originated from an Apollo-type orbit and was inserted into a
Jupiter-family comet (JFC) orbit due to the net energy gained during the close
encounter with the Earth. Based on numerical simulations, the meteoroid will
likely spend ~200kyrs on a JFC orbit and have numerous encounters with Jupiter,
the first of which will occur in January-March 2025. Eventually the meteoroid
will likely be ejected from the Solar System or be flung into a trans-Neptunian
orbit.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.01894 [pdf] - 2009582
Identification of a Minimoon Fireball
Submitted: 2019-12-04
Objects gravitationally captured by the Earth-Moon system are commonly called
temporarily captured orbiters (TCOs), natural Earth satellites, or minimoons.
TCOs are a crucially important subpopulation of near-Earth objects (NEOs) to
understand because they are the easiest targets for future sample-return,
redirection, or asteroid mining missions. Only one TCO has ever been observed
telescopically, 2006 RH 120, and it orbited Earth for about 11 months.
Additionally, only one TCO fireball has ever been observed prior to this study.
We present our observations of an extremely slow fireball (codename
DN160822_03) with an initial velocity of around 11.0 km s-1 that was detected
by six of the high-resolution digital fireball observatories located in the
South Australian region of the Desert Fireball Network. Due to the inherent
dynamics of the system, the probability of the meteoroid being temporarily
captured before impact is extremely sensitive to its initial velocity. We
examine the sensitivity of the fireball's orbital history to the chosen
triangulation method. We use the numerical integrator REBOUND to assess
particle histories and assess the statistical origin of DN160822_03. From our
integrations we have found that the most probable capture time, velocity,
semimajor axis, NEO group, and capture mechanism vary annually for this event.
Most particles show that there is an increased capture probability during
Earth's aphelion and perihelion. In the future, events like these may be
detected ahead of time using telescopes like the Large Synoptic Survey
Telescope, and the pre-atmospheric trajectory can be verified.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.11494 [pdf] - 2025880
Determining fireball fates using the $\alpha$-$\beta$ criterion
Sansom, Eleanor K.;
Gritsevich, Maria;
Devillepoix, Hadrien A. R.;
Jansen-Sturgeon, Trent;
Shober, Patrick;
Bland, Phil A.;
Towner, Martin C.;
Cupák, Martin;
Howie, Robert M.;
Hartig, Benjamin A. D.
Submitted: 2019-09-25
As fireball networks grow, the number of events observed becomes unfeasible
to manage by manual efforts. Reducing and analysing big data requires automated
data pipelines. Triangulation of a fireball trajectory can swiftly provide
information on positions and, with timing information, velocities. However,
extending this pipeline to determine the terminal mass estimate of a meteoroid
is a complex next step. Established methods typically require assumptions to be
made of the physical meteoroid characteristics (such as shape and bulk
density). To determine which meteoroids may have survived entry there are
empirical criteria that use a fireball's final height and velocity - low and
slow final parameters are likely the best candidates. We review the more
elegant approach of the dimensionless coefficient method. Two parameters,
$\alpha$ (ballistic coefficient) and $\beta$ (mass-loss), can be calculated for
any event with some degree of deceleration, given only velocity and height
information. $\alpha$ and $\beta$ can be used to analytically describe a
trajectory with the advantage that they are not mere fitting coefficients; they
also represent the physical meteoroid properties. This approach can be applied
to any fireball network as an initial identification of key events and
determine on which to concentrate resources for more in depth analyses. We used
a set of 278 events observed by the Desert Fireball Network to show how
visualisation in an $\alpha$ - $\beta$ diagram can quickly identify which
fireballs are likely meteorite candidates.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.09195 [pdf] - 1811098
Observation of metre-scale impactors by the Desert Fireball Network
Submitted: 2018-08-28
The Earth is impacted by 35-40 metre-scale objects every year. These
meteoroids are the low mass end of impactors that can do damage on the ground.
Despite this they are very poorly surveyed and characterised, too infrequent
for ground based fireball bservation efforts, and too small to be efficiently
detected by NEO telescopic surveys whilst still in interplanetary space. We
want to evaluate the suitability of different instruments for characterising
metre-scale impactors and where they come from. We use data collected over the
first 3 years of operation of the continent-scale Desert Fireball Network, and
compare results with other published results as well as orbital sensors. We
find that although the orbital sensors have the advantage of using the entire
planet as collecting area, there are several serious problems with the accuracy
of the data, notably the reported velocity vector, which is key to getting an
accurate pre-impact orbit and calculating meteorite fall positions. We also
outline dynamic range issues that fireball networks face when observing large
meteoroid entries.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.02557 [pdf] - 1747870
The Dingle Dell meteorite: a Halloween treat from the Main Belt
Devillepoix, Hadrien A. R.;
Sansom, Eleanor K.;
Bland, Philip A.;
Towner, Martin C.;
Cupák, Martin;
Howie, Robert M.;
Jansen-Sturgeon, Trent;
Cox, Morgan A.;
Hartig, Benjamin A. D.;
Benedix, Gretchen K.;
Paxman, Jonathan P.
Submitted: 2018-03-07, last modified: 2018-04-30
We describe the fall of the Dingle Dell (L/LL 5) meteorite near Morawa in
Western Australia on October 31, 2016. The fireball was observed by six
observatories of the Desert Fireball Network (DFN), a continental scale
facility optimised to recover meteorites and calculate their pre-entry orbits.
The $30\,\mbox{cm}$ meteoroid entered at 15.44 $\mbox{km s}^{-1}$, followed a
moderately steep trajectory of $51^{\circ}$ to the horizon from 81 km down to
19 km altitude, where the luminous flight ended at a speed of 3.2 $\mbox{km
s}^{-1}$. Deceleration data indicated one large fragment had made it to the
ground. The four person search team recovered a 1.15 kg meteorite within 130 m
of the predicted fall line, after 8 hours of searching, 6 days after the fall.
Dingle Dell is the fourth meteorite recovered by the DFN in Australia, but the
first before any rain had contaminated the sample. By numerical integration
over 1 Ma, we show that Dingle Dell was most likely ejected from the main belt
by the 3:1 mean-motion resonance with Jupiter, with only a marginal chance that
it came from the $nu_6$ resonance. This makes the connection of Dingle Dell to
the Flora family (currently thought to be the origin of LL chondrites)
unlikely.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05846 [pdf] - 1608506
Follow up of GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart by
Australian-led observing programs
Andreoni, I.;
Ackley, K.;
Cooke, J.;
Acharyya, A.;
Allison, J. R.;
Anderson, G. E.;
Ashley, M. C. B.;
Baade, D.;
Bailes, M.;
Bannister, K.;
Beardsley, A.;
Bessell, M. S.;
Bian, F.;
Bland, P. A.;
Boer, M.;
Booler, T.;
Brandeker, A.;
Brown, I. S.;
Buckley, D.;
Chang, S. -W.;
Coward, D. M.;
Crawford, S.;
Crisp, H.;
Crosse, B.;
Cucchiara, A.;
Cupák, M.;
de Gois, J. S.;
Deller, A.;
Devillepoix, H. A. R.;
Dobie, D.;
Elmer, E.;
Emrich, D.;
Farah, W.;
Farrell, T. J.;
Franzen, T.;
Gaensler, B. M.;
Galloway, D. K.;
Gendre, B.;
Giblin, T.;
Goobar, A.;
Green, J.;
Hancock, P. J.;
Hartig, B. A. D.;
Howell, E. J.;
Horsley, L.;
Hotan, A.;
Howie, R. M.;
Hu, L.;
Hu, Y.;
James, C. W.;
Johnston, S.;
Johnston-Hollitt, M.;
Kaplan, D. L.;
Kasliwal, M.;
Keane, E. F.;
Kenney, D.;
Klotz, A.;
Lau, R.;
Laugier, R.;
Lenc, E.;
Li, X.;
Liang, E.;
Lidman, C.;
Luvaul, L. C.;
Lynch, C.;
Ma, B.;
Macpherson, D.;
Mao, J.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCully, C.;
Möller, A.;
Morales, M. F.;
Morris, D.;
Murphy, T.;
Noysena, K.;
Onken, C. A.;
Orange, N. B.;
Oslowski, S.;
Pallot, D.;
Paxman, J.;
Potter, S. B.;
Pritchard, T.;
Raja, W.;
Ridden-Harper, R.;
Romero-Colmenero, E.;
Sadler, E. M.;
Sansom, E. K.;
Scalzo, R. A.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seghouani, N.;
Shang, Z.;
Shannon, R. M.;
Shao, L.;
Shara, M. M.;
Sharp, R.;
Sokolowski, M.;
Sollerman, J.;
Staff, J.;
Steele, K.;
Sun, T.;
Suntzeff, N. B.;
Tao, C.;
Tingay, S.;
Towner, M. C.;
Thierry, P.;
Trott, C.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Väisänen, P.;
Krishnan, V. Venkatraman;
Walker, M.;
Wang, L.;
Wang, X.;
Wayth, R.;
Whiting, M.;
Williams, A.;
Williams, T.;
Wolf, C.;
Wu, C.;
Wu, X.;
Yang, J.;
Yuan, X.;
Zhang, H.;
Zhou, J.;
Zovaro, H.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
The discovery of the first electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational
wave signal has generated follow-up observations by over 50 facilities
world-wide, ushering in the new era of multi-messenger astronomy. In this
paper, we present follow-up observations of the gravitational wave event
GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart SSS17a/DLT17ck (IAU label
AT2017gfo) by 14 Australian telescopes and partner observatories as part of
Australian-based and Australian-led research programs. We report early- to
late-time multi-wavelength observations, including optical imaging and
spectroscopy, mid-infrared imaging, radio imaging, and searches for fast radio
bursts. Our optical spectra reveal that the transient source afterglow cooled
from approximately 6400K to 2100K over a 7-day period and produced no
significant optical emission lines. The spectral profiles, cooling rate, and
photometric light curves are consistent with the expected outburst and
subsequent processes of a binary neutron star merger. Star formation in the
host galaxy probably ceased at least a Gyr ago, although there is evidence for
a galaxy merger. Binary pulsars with short (100 Myr) decay times are therefore
unlikely progenitors, but pulsars like PSR B1534+12 with its 2.7 Gyr
coalescence time could produce such a merger. The displacement (about 2.2 kpc)
of the binary star system from the centre of the main galaxy is not unusual for
stars in the host galaxy or stars originating in the merging galaxy, and
therefore any constraints on the kick velocity imparted to the progenitor are
poor.