Normalized to: Cox, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.06683 [pdf] - 2037577
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Mission Concept Study Final
Report
Gaudi, B. Scott;
Seager, Sara;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Kiessling, Alina;
Warfield, Keith;
Cahoy, Kerri;
Clarke, John T.;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn;
Feinberg, Lee;
Guyon, Olivier;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Mawet, Dimitri;
Plavchan, Peter;
Robinson, Tyler;
Rogers, Leslie;
Scowen, Paul;
Somerville, Rachel;
Stapelfeldt, Karl;
Stark, Christopher;
Stern, Daniel;
Turnbull, Margaret;
Amini, Rashied;
Kuan, Gary;
Martin, Stefan;
Morgan, Rhonda;
Redding, David;
Stahl, H. Philip;
Webb, Ryan;
Alvarez-Salazar, Oscar;
Arnold, William L.;
Arya, Manan;
Balasubramanian, Bala;
Baysinger, Mike;
Bell, Ray;
Below, Chris;
Benson, Jonathan;
Blais, Lindsey;
Booth, Jeff;
Bourgeois, Robert;
Bradford, Case;
Brewer, Alden;
Brooks, Thomas;
Cady, Eric;
Caldwell, Mary;
Calvet, Rob;
Carr, Steven;
Chan, Derek;
Cormarkovic, Velibor;
Coste, Keith;
Cox, Charlie;
Danner, Rolf;
Davis, Jacqueline;
Dewell, Larry;
Dorsett, Lisa;
Dunn, Daniel;
East, Matthew;
Effinger, Michael;
Eng, Ron;
Freebury, Greg;
Garcia, Jay;
Gaskin, Jonathan;
Greene, Suzan;
Hennessy, John;
Hilgemann, Evan;
Hood, Brad;
Holota, Wolfgang;
Howe, Scott;
Huang, Pei;
Hull, Tony;
Hunt, Ron;
Hurd, Kevin;
Johnson, Sandra;
Kissil, Andrew;
Knight, Brent;
Kolenz, Daniel;
Kraus, Oliver;
Krist, John;
Li, Mary;
Lisman, Doug;
Mandic, Milan;
Mann, John;
Marchen, Luis;
Marrese-Reading, Colleen;
McCready, Jonathan;
McGown, Jim;
Missun, Jessica;
Miyaguchi, Andrew;
Moore, Bradley;
Nemati, Bijan;
Nikzad, Shouleh;
Nissen, Joel;
Novicki, Megan;
Perrine, Todd;
Pineda, Claudia;
Polanco, Otto;
Putnam, Dustin;
Qureshi, Atif;
Richards, Michael;
Riggs, A. J. Eldorado;
Rodgers, Michael;
Rud, Mike;
Saini, Navtej;
Scalisi, Dan;
Scharf, Dan;
Schulz, Kevin;
Serabyn, Gene;
Sigrist, Norbert;
Sikkia, Glory;
Singleton, Andrew;
Shaklan, Stuart;
Smith, Scott;
Southerd, Bart;
Stahl, Mark;
Steeves, John;
Sturges, Brian;
Sullivan, Chris;
Tang, Hao;
Taras, Neil;
Tesch, Jonathan;
Therrell, Melissa;
Tseng, Howard;
Valente, Marty;
Van Buren, David;
Villalvazo, Juan;
Warwick, Steve;
Webb, David;
Westerhoff, Thomas;
Wofford, Rush;
Wu, Gordon;
Woo, Jahning;
Wood, Milana;
Ziemer, John;
Arney, Giada;
Anderson, Jay;
Maíz-Apellániz, Jesús;
Bartlett, James;
Belikov, Ruslan;
Bendek, Eduardo;
Cenko, Brad;
Douglas, Ewan;
Dulz, Shannon;
Evans, Chris;
Faramaz, Virginie;
Feng, Y. Katherina;
Ferguson, Harry;
Follette, Kate;
Ford, Saavik;
García, Miriam;
Geha, Marla;
Gelino, Dawn;
Götberg, Ylva;
Hildebrandt, Sergi;
Hu, Renyu;
Jahnke, Knud;
Kennedy, Grant;
Kreidberg, Laura;
Isella, Andrea;
Lopez, Eric;
Marchis, Franck;
Macri, Lucas;
Marley, Mark;
Matzko, William;
Mazoyer, Johan;
McCandliss, Stephan;
Meshkat, Tiffany;
Mordasini, Christoph;
Morris, Patrick;
Nielsen, Eric;
Newman, Patrick;
Petigura, Erik;
Postman, Marc;
Reines, Amy;
Roberge, Aki;
Roederer, Ian;
Ruane, Garreth;
Schwieterman, Edouard;
Sirbu, Dan;
Spalding, Christopher;
Teplitz, Harry;
Tumlinson, Jason;
Turner, Neal;
Werk, Jessica;
Wofford, Aida;
Wyatt, Mark;
Young, Amber;
Zellem, Rob
Submitted: 2020-01-18, last modified: 2020-01-26
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory, or HabEx, has been designed to be the
Great Observatory of the 2030s. For the first time in human history,
technologies have matured sufficiently to enable an affordable space-based
telescope mission capable of discovering and characterizing Earthlike planets
orbiting nearby bright sunlike stars in order to search for signs of
habitability and biosignatures. Such a mission can also be equipped with
instrumentation that will enable broad and exciting general astrophysics and
planetary science not possible from current or planned facilities. HabEx is a
space telescope with unique imaging and multi-object spectroscopic capabilities
at wavelengths ranging from ultraviolet (UV) to near-IR. These capabilities
allow for a broad suite of compelling science that cuts across the entire NASA
astrophysics portfolio. HabEx has three primary science goals: (1) Seek out
nearby worlds and explore their habitability; (2) Map out nearby planetary
systems and understand the diversity of the worlds they contain; (3) Enable new
explorations of astrophysical systems from our own solar system to external
galaxies by extending our reach in the UV through near-IR. This Great
Observatory science will be selected through a competed GO program, and will
account for about 50% of the HabEx primary mission. The preferred HabEx
architecture is a 4m, monolithic, off-axis telescope that is
diffraction-limited at 0.4 microns and is in an L2 orbit. HabEx employs two
starlight suppression systems: a coronagraph and a starshade, each with their
own dedicated instrument.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.01459 [pdf] - 1760631
Regolith behavior under asteroid-level gravity conditions: low-velocity
impact experiments
Submitted: 2018-10-02
The dusty regolith covering the surfaces of asteroids and planetary
satellites differs in size, shape, and composition from terrestrial soil
particles and is subject to very different environmental conditions.
Experimental studies of the response of planetary regolith in the relevant
environmental conditions are thus necessary to facilitate future Solar System
exploration activities. We combined the results and provided new data analysis
elements for a series of impact experiments into simulated planetary regolith
in low-gravity conditions using two experimental setups: the Physics of
Regolith Impacts in Microgravity Experiment (PRIME) and the COLLisions Into
Dust Experiment (COLLIDE). Results of these experimental campaigns found that
there is a significant change in the regolith behavior with the gravity
environment. In a 10-2g environment (Lunar g levels), only embedding of the
impactor was observed and ejecta production was produced for most impacts at >
20 cm/s. Once at microgravity levels (<10-4g), the lowest impact energies also
produced impactor rebound. In these microgravity conditions, ejecta started to
be produced for impacts at > 10 cm/s. The measured ejecta speeds were lower
than the ones measured at reduced-gravity levels, but the ejected masses were
higher. The mean ejecta velocity shows a power-law dependence on the impact
energy with an index of ~0.7. When projectile rebound occurred, we observed
that its coefficients of restitution on the bed of regolith simulant decrease
by a factor of 10 with increasing impact speeds from ~5 cm/s up to 100 cm/s. We
could also observe an increased cohesion between the JSC-1 grains compared to
the quartz sand targets.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.09674 [pdf] - 1757320
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory (HabEx) Mission Concept Study
Interim Report
Gaudi, B. Scott;
Seager, Sara;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Kiessling, Alina;
Warfield, Keith;
Kuan, Gary;
Cahoy, Kerri;
Clarke, John T.;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn;
Feinberg, Lee;
Guyon, Olivier;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Mawet, Dimitri;
Robinson, Tyler;
Rogers, Leslie;
Scowen, Paul;
Somerville, Rachel;
Stapelfeldt, Karl;
Stark, Christopher;
Stern, Daniel;
Turnbull, Margaret;
Martin, Stefan;
Alvarez-Salazar, Oscar;
Amini, Rashied;
Arnold, William;
Balasubramanian, Bala;
Baysinger, Mike;
Blais, Lindsey;
Brooks, Thomas;
Calvet, Rob;
Cormarkovic, Velibor;
Cox, Charlie;
Danner, Rolf;
Davis, Jacqueline;
Dorsett, Lisa;
Effinger, Michael;
Eng, Ron;
Garcia, Jay;
Gaskin, Jonathan;
Harris, Joby;
Howe, Scott;
Knight, Brent;
Krist, John;
Levine, David;
Li, Mary;
Lisman, Doug;
Mandic, Milan;
Marchen, Luis;
Marrese-Reading, Colleen;
McGowen, Jim;
Miyaguchi, Andrew;
Morgan, Rhonda;
Nemati, Bijan;
Nikzad, Shouleh;
Nissen, Joel;
Novicki, Megan;
Perrine, Todd;
Redding, David;
Richards, Michael;
Rud, Mike;
Scharf, Dan;
Serabyn, Gene;
Shaklan, Stuart;
Smith, Scott;
Stahl, Mark;
Stahl, Phil;
Tang, Hao;
Van Buren, David;
Villalvazo, Juan;
Warwick, Steve;
Webb, David;
Wofford, Rush;
Woo, Jahning;
Wood, Milana;
Ziemer, John;
Douglas, Ewan;
Faramaz, Virginie;
Hildebrandt, Sergi;
Meshkat, Tiffany;
Plavchan, Peter;
Ruane, Garreth;
Turner, Neal
Submitted: 2018-09-25
For the first time in human history, technologies have matured sufficiently
to enable a mission capable of discovering and characterizing habitable planets
like Earth orbiting sunlike stars other than the Sun. At the same time, such a
platform would enable unique science not possible from ground-based facilities.
This science is broad and exciting, ranging from new investigations of our own
solar system to a full range of astrophysics disciplines.
The Habitable Exoplanet Observatory, or HabEx, is one of four studies
currently being undertaken by NASA in preparation for the 2020 Astrophysics
Decadal Survey. HabEx has been designed to be the Great Observatory of the
2030s, with community involvement through a competed and funded Guest Observer
(GO) program. This interim report describes the HabEx baseline concept, which
is a space-based 4-meter diameter telescope mission concept with ultraviolet
(UV), optical, and near-infrared (near-IR) imaging and spectroscopy
capabilities.
More information on HabEx can be found at https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/habex
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0212208 [pdf] - 53598
Calibration of Geometric Distortion in the ACS Detectors
Meurer, G. R.;
Lindler, D.;
Blakeslee, J. P.;
Cox, C.;
Martel, A. R.;
Tran, H. D.;
Bouwens, R. J.;
Ford, H. C.;
Clampin, M.;
Hartig, G. F.;
Sirianni, M.;
de Marchi, G.
Submitted: 2002-12-09
The off-axis location of the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) is the chief
(but not sole) cause of strong geometric distortion in all detectors: the Wide
Field Camera (WFC), High Resolution Camera (HRC), and Solar Blind Camera (SBC).
Dithered observations of rich star cluster fields are used to calibrate the
distortion. We describe the observations obtained, the algorithms used to
perform the calibrations and the accuracy achieved.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9802105 [pdf] - 100276
Far-Infrared Emission From E and E/S0 Galaxies
Submitted: 1998-02-09
Studies of cold material through IRAS 60um and 100um observations indicated
that half of ordinary E and E/S0 galaxies were detected above the 3 sigma
level, indicating that cold gas is common, although no correlation was found
between the optical and far- infrared fluxes. Most detections were near the
instrumental threshold, and given an improved understanding of detection
confidence, we reconsider the 60um and 100um detection rate. After excluding
active galactic nuclei, peculiar systems, and background contamination, only 15
non-peculiar E and E/S0 galaxies from the RSA catalog are detected above the
98% confidence level, about 12% of the sample. An unusually high percentage of
these 15 galaxies possess cold gas (HI, CO) and optical emission lines
(Halpha), supporting the presence of gas cooler than 10E4 K. The 60um to 100um
flux ratios imply a median dust temperature for the sample of 30 K, with a
range of 23-38 K.
These detections define the upper envelope of the optical to far-infrared
relationship, F_fir propto F_B^0.24+/-0.08, showing that optically bright
objects are also brighter in the infrared, although with considerable
dispersion. A luminosity correlation is present with L_fir propto
L_B^1.65+/-0.28, but the dust temperature is uncorrelated with luminosity.
Models that contain large dust grains composed of amorphous carbon plus
silicates come close to reproducing the typical 60um to 100um flux ratios, the
far-infrared luminosity, and the L_fir - L_B relationship.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9712171 [pdf] - 99660
Far Infrared Emission from Galaxy Clusters and Early-Type Galaxies
Submitted: 1997-12-12
Infrared emission has been detected from normal elliptical galaxies and from
clusters of galaxies at 60um and 100um with the IRAS satellite. In both cases,
the emission has the characteristics of cool dust with a temperature near 30K.
For the elliptical galaxies, there is a correlation between the optical
luminosities and the far infrared luminosities. The likely source of the dust
in these systems is mass loss from stars, which is heated by starlight and
either is distributed throughout the galaxy or falls into a central disk.
Analysis of upcoming ISO data will permit us to distinguish between these
possibilities.
The far infrared emission from clusters of galaxies is of high luminosity but
is only detected in 10% of the cases. The heating is either due to electron
impact from the hot gas (a suitable explanation for one cluster) or photon
absorption. The source of the dust is probably gas stripped from galaxies. For
clusters, ISO data will provide good mass determinations and positions, thereby
allowing us to determine the source of the heating.