sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Couture, Gilles

Normalized to: Couture, G.

2 article(s) in total.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1908.06191  [pdf] - 1945054
Kuiperian Objects and Wandering Cosmic Objects
Comments: 26 pages, 7 figures, 4 tables
Submitted: 2019-08-16
We study the effects of an encounter between a wandering cosmic object (WCO) of 0.1 solar mass and some Kuiperian Objects (KO). First, we let the WCO cross the out-skirt of ou Kuiper belt. Such encounters can produce two types of solar objects: Eccentric Kuiper Objects of type I (EKO-I) whose perihelion is comparable to, but always smaller than the aphelion of the initial KO and Eccentric Kuiper Objects of type II (EKO-II) whose perihelion can be as small as a few AU. EKO-I tend to have a fairly large range of eccentricities, but EKO-II tend to have very large eccentricities. Both tend to be produced in clusters similar to those observed in Extreme TransNeptunian Objects (ETNO). When a WCO crosses the path of an EKO-I, it will produce two main classes of objects: Far Kuiper Objects (FKO) of types I and II. The Sednitos discovered in the past years fit the FKO-I class with their large major axis and fairly large eccentricity, while the FKO-II class is different with its large major axis but smaller eccentricity and opposite spinning direction. When a WCO encounters an EKO-II, the latter can remain in the same class, spinning in either direction, it can also en up in the EKO-I class also spinning in either direction, but it can also be sent onto orbits with extremely long semi-major axis, relatively small eccentricity where both spins are allowed. This FKO-III class could be likened to the Lower Oort Cloud Objects as their major axis is a fair fraction of a light-year. These results lead us to consider the possibility that the Kuiper Belt was once substantially larger than it is now, perhaps 90 AU. We find some evidence of this scenario in current astronomical data.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1710.09455  [pdf] - 1590292
Ninth Planet or Wandering Star ?
Comments: 12 pages and 9 figures
Submitted: 2017-10-25
We study the gravitational effects of two celestrial bodies on a typical object of the Kuyper Belt. The first body is a kuyperian object itself with fairly large eccentricity and perihelion but with a large mass, about 16 times the mass of the Earth. The second body is a star whose mass is 30% - 50% of the mass of the sun that passes by our solar system at a speed between 25 km/sec and 100 km/sec and at a distance of closest approach between 0.05 and 0.5 light year. As a measure of the perturbations caused by these bodies on the light kuyperian object, we analyse its eccentricity. We find that the effects due to the passage of the wandering star are permanent in the sense that the eccentricity of the kuyperian object remains anomalous long after the passage of the star. The same is true of the heavy kuyperian object: it can perturb greatly the orbit of the lighter kuyperian object, which leads to a permanent, anomalous eccentricity.