% context heading (optional) {Thanks to the Venus Express Mission, new data on the properties of Venus could be obtained in particular concerning its rotation.} % aims heading (mandatory) {In view of these upcoming results, the purpose of this paper is to determine and compare the major physical processes influencing the rotation of Venus, and more particularly the angular rotation rate.} % methods heading (mandatory) {Applying models already used for the Earth, the effect of the triaxiality of a rigid Venus on its period of rotation are computed. Then the variations of Venus rotation caused by the elasticity, the atmosphere and the core of the planet are evaluated.} % results heading (mandatory) {Although the largest irregularities of the rotation rate of the Earth at short time scales are caused by its atmosphere and elastic deformations, we show that the Venus ones are dominated by the tidal torque exerted by the Sun on its solid body. Indeed, as Venus has a slow rotation, these effects have a large amplitude of 2 minutes of time (mn). These variations of the rotation rate are larger than the one induced by atmospheric wind variations that can reach 25-50 seconds of time (s), depending on the simulation used. The variations due to the core effects which vary with its size between 3 and 20s are smaller. Compared to these effects, the influence of the elastic deformation cause by the zonal tidal potential is negligible.} % conclusions heading (optional), leave it empty if necessary {As the variations of the rotation of Venus reported here are of the order 3mn peak to peak, they should influence past, present and future observations providing further constraints on the planet internal structure and atmosphere.}

Although the rotation of some Saturn's satellites in spin-orbit has already been studied by several authors, this is not the case of the rotation of Phoebe, which has the particularity of being non resonant. The purpose of the paper is to determine for the first time and with precision its precession-nutation motion. We adopt an Hamiltonian formalism of the motion of rotation of rigid celestial body set up by Kinoshita (1977) based on Andoyer variables and canonical equations. First we calculate Phoebe's obliquity at J2000,0 from available astronomical data as well as the gravitational perturbation due to Saturn on Phoebe rotational motion. Then we carry out a numerical integration and we compare our results for the precession rate and the nutation coefficients with pure analytical model. Our results for Phoebe obliquity (23{\deg}95) and Phoebe precession rate (5580".65/cy) are very close to the respective values for the Earth. Moreover the amplitudes of the nutations (26" peak to peak for the nutaton in longitude and 8" for the nutation in obliquity) are of the same order as the respective amplitudes for the Earth. We give complete tables of nutation, obtained from a FFT analysis starting from the numerical signals. We show that a pure analytical model of the nutation is not accurate due to the fact that Phoebe orbital elements e, M and Ls are far from having a simple linear behaviour. The precession and nutation of Phoebe have been calculated for the first time in this paper. We should keep on the study in the future by studying the additional gravitational effects of the Sun, of the large satellites as Titan, as well as Saturn dynamical ellipticity.

% context :The precise and accurate modelling of a terrestrial planet like Venus is an exciting and challenging topic, all the more interesting since it can be compared with that of the Earth for which such a modelling has already been achieved at the milliarcsecond level % aims: We want to complete a previous study (Cottereau and Souchay, 2009), by determining at the milliarcsecond level the polhody, i.e. the torque-free motion of the axis of angular momentum of a rigid Venus in a body-fixed frame, as well as the nutation of its third axis of figure in space, which is fundamental from an observational point of view. results :In a first part we have computed the polhody, i.e. the respective free rotational motion of the axis of angular momentum of Venus with respect to a body-fixed frame. We have shown that this motion is highly elliptical, with a very long period of 525 cy to be compared with 430 d for the Earth. This is due to the very small dynamical flattening of Venus in comparison with our planet. In a second part we have computed precisely the Oppolzer terms which allow to represent the motion in space of the third Venus figure axis with respect to Venus angular momentum axis, under the influence of the solar gravitational torque. We have determined the corresponding tables of coefficients of nutation of the third figure axis both in longitude and in obliquity due to the Sun, which are of the same order of amplitude as for the Earth. We have shown that the coefficients of nutation for the third figure axis are significantly different from those of the angular momentum axis on the contrary of the Earth. Our analytical results have been validated by a numerical integration which revealed the indirect planetary effects.

Context: With the increasing knowledge of the terrestrial planets due to recent space probes it is possible to model their rotation with increasing accuracy. Despite that fact, an accurate determination of Venus precession and nutation is lacking. Aims : Although Venus rotation has been studied in several aspects, a full and precise analytical model of its precession-nutation motion remains to be constructed. We propose to determine this motion with up-to-date physical parameters of the planet Methods: We adopt a theoritical framework already used for a precise precession-nutation model of the Earth, based on a Hamiltonian formulation, canonical equations and an accurate development of the perturbing function due to the Sun. Results: After integrating the disturbing function and applying the canonical equations, we can evaluate the precession constant $\dot{\Psi}$ and the coefficients of nutation, both in longitude and in obliquity. We get $\dot{\Psi}=4474".35/Jcy \pm 66.5 $, corresponding to a precession period of $28965.10 \pm 437$ years. This result, based on recent estimations of the Venus moment of inertia is significantly different from previous estimations. The largest nutation coefficient in longitude with an argument $2L_{S}$ (where $L_{S}$ is the longitude of the Sun) has a 2"19 amplitude and a 112.35 d period. We show that the coefficients of nutation of Venus due to its triaxiality are of the same order of amplitude as these values due to its dynamical flattening, unlike of the Earth, for which they are negligible.